School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Similar documents
Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

George A. Buljan Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

El Toro Elementary School

Dyer-Kelly Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Bella Vista High School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

John F. Kennedy Middle School

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

Malcolm X Elementary School 1731 Prince Street Berkeley, CA (510) Grades K-5 Alexander Hunt, Principal

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

San Luis Coastal Unified School District School Accountability Report Card Published During

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

Arthur E. Wright Middle School 1

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

Engage Educate Empower

Dr. Russell Johnson Middle School

John F. Kennedy Junior High School

Dr. Russell Johnson Middle School

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

Iva Meairs Elementary School

Cupertino High School Accountabiltiy Report Card. Kami Tomberlain, Principal FREMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

Arthur E. Wright Middle School

Diablo Vista Middle 1

Cupertino High School Accountabiltiy Report Card. Kami Tomberlain, Principal FREMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

Val Verde Unified School District

Kahului Elementary School

STAR Results. All Students. Percentage of Students Scoring at Proficient and Advanced Levels. El Rodeo BHUSD CA. Adequate Yearly Progress

Shelters Elementary School

Val Verde Unified School District

Summary of Selected Data Charter Schools Authorized by Alameda County Board of Education

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Local Control and Accountability Plan and Annual Update Template

Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

Hokulani Elementary School

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Hale`iwa. Elementary School Grades K-6. School Status and Improvement Report Content. Focus On School

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

Alvin Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

Description of Program Report Codes Used in Expenditure of State Funds

Samuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate School

President Abraham Lincoln Elementary School

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

Desert Valley High School SELF-STUDY REPORT

Arlington Elementary All. *Administration observation of CCSS implementation in the classroom and NGSS in grades 4 & 5

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

Local Educational Agency California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Student Data File Layout

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

Milton Public Schools Fiscal Year 2018 Budget Presentation

12-month Enrollment

JOHN F. KENNEDY HIGH SCHOOL THREE-YEAR-TERM REVISIT VISITING COMMITTEE REPORT

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

Cuero Independent School District

Charter School Reporting and Monitoring Activity

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

UW-Waukesha Pre-College Program. College Bound Take Charge of Your Future!

SFY 2017 American Indian Opportunities and Industrialization Center (AIOIC) Equity Direct Appropriation

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability

CSU East Bay EAP Breakfast. CSU Office of the Chancellor Student Academic Services Lourdes Kulju Academic Outreach and Early Assessment

CDS Code

APPLICANT INFORMATION. Area Code: Phone: Area Code: Phone:

1.0 INTRODUCTION. The purpose of the Florida school district performance review is to identify ways that a designated school district can:

DO SOMETHING! Become a Youth Leader, Join ASAP. HAVE A VOICE MAKE A DIFFERENCE BE PART OF A GROUP WORKING TO CREATE CHANGE IN EDUCATION

Educational Attainment

University of Arizona

STANISLAUS COUNTY CIVIL GRAND JURY CASE #08-04 LA GRANGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT

Missouri 4-H University of Missouri 4-H Center for Youth Development

NC Education Oversight Committee Meeting

Aligning and Improving Systems for Special Education Services in St Paul Public Schools. Dr. Elizabeth Keenan Assistant Superintendent

African American Male Achievement Update

An Introduction to School Finance in Texas

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

Facts and Figures Office of Institutional Research and Planning

Summary of Special Provisions & Money Report Conference Budget July 30, 2014 Updated July 31, 2014

Executive Summary. Walker County Board of Education. Dr. Jason Adkins, Superintendent 1710 Alabama Avenue Jasper, AL 35501

KENT STATE UNIVERSITY

Annual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent


RtI: Changing the Role of the IAT

Los Angeles City College Student Equity Plan. Signature Page

Orleans Central Supervisory Union

46 Children s Defense Fund

Lakewood Board of Education 200 Ramsey Avenue, Lakewood, NJ 08701

Personnel Administrators. Alexis Schauss. Director of School Business NC Department of Public Instruction

3/6/2009. Residence Halls & Strategic t Planning Overview. Residence Halls Overview. Residence Halls: Marapai Supai Kachina

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity

Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey

Deer Valley High School WASC MID CYCLE REPORT

The Achievement Gap in California: Context, Status, and Approaches for Improvement

PSYC 620, Section 001: Traineeship in School Psychology Fall 2016

Council on Postsecondary Education Funding Model for the Public Universities (Excluding KSU) Bachelor's Degrees

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

SMILE Noyce Scholars Program Application

Transcription:

School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the 2016-17 School Year Published During 2017-18 By February 1 of each year, every school in California is required by state law to publish a School Accountability Report Card (SARC). The SARC contains information about the condition and performance of each California public school. Under the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) all local educational agencies (LEAs) are required to prepare a Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP), which describes how they intend to meet annual school-specific goals for all pupils, with specific activities to address state and local priorities. Additionally, data reported in an LCAP is to be consistent with data reported in the SARC. For more information about SARC requirements, see the California Department of Education (CDE) SARC Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/. For more information about the LCFF or LCAP, see the CDE LCFF Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/aa/lc/. For additional information about the school, parents/guardians and community members should contact the school principal or the district office. DataQuest DataQuest is an online data tool located on the CDE DataQuest Web page at http://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/ that contains additional information about this school and comparisons of the school to the district and the county. Specifically, DataQuest is a dynamic system that provides reports for accountability (e.g., test data, enrollment, high school graduates, dropouts, course enrollments, staffing, and data regarding English learners). Internet Access Internet access is available at public libraries and other locations that are publicly accessible (e.g., the California State Library). Access to the Internet at libraries and public locations is generally provided on a first-come, first-served basis. Other use restrictions may include the hours of operation, the length of time that a workstation may be used (depending on availability), the types of software programs available on a workstation, and the ability to print documents. About This School Contact Information (School Year 2017-18) School Contact Information School Name------- Street------- City, State, Zip------- Phone Number------- Principal------- E-mail Address------- Web Site------- CDS Code 2016-17 School Accountability Report Card for Page 1 of 9

District Contact Information District Name------- Orange Unified School District Phone Number------- (714) 628-4000 Superintendent------ Gunn Marie Hansen, PhD E-mail Address------- superintendent@orangeusd.k12.ca.us Web Site------- www.orangeusd.k12.ca.us School Description and Mission Statement (School Year 2017-18) Student Enrollment by Grade Level (School Year 2016-17) Grade Number of Level Students Grade 7 608 Grade 8 596 Total Enrollment 1,204 Student Enrollment by Group (School Year 2016-17) Student Percent of Group Total Enrollment Black or African American 1.3 American Indian or Alaska Native 0.4 Asian 19.4 Filipino 3.4 Hispanic or Latino 17.7 Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0.2 White 52.3 Two or More Races 3.2 Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 12 English Learners 3.6 Students with Disabilities 6.4 Foster Youth 0.1 2016-17 School Accountability Report Card for Page 2 of 9

A. Conditions of Learning State Priority: Basic The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: Basic (Priority 1): Degree to which teachers are appropriately assigned and fully credentialed in the subject area and for the pupils they are teaching; Pupils have access to standards-aligned instructional materials; and School facilities are maintained in good repair. Teacher Credentials Teachers With Full Credential Without Full Credential Teaching Outside Subject Area of Competence (with full credential) School District 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 2017-18 Teacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher Positions Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners Total Teacher Misassignments * Indicator 2015-16 2016-17 2017-18 Vacant Teacher Positions Note: Misassignments refers to the number of positions filled by teachers who lack legal authorization to teach that grade level, subject area, student group, etc. * Total Teacher Misassignments includes the number of Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners. Quality, Currency, Availability of Textbooks and Instructional Materials (School Year 2017-18) Year and month in which data were collected: October 5, 2017 All K-8 textbooks are selected from the state matrix provided through the California Board of Education. Teachers peruse the materials and select by majority vote. Selected texts are then submitted to the Board of Education for final approval. Textbooks are procured in sufficient numbers for each student to receive a textbook. High School adoptions are content area based, with teachers selecting appropriate materials for the course objectives as outlined in the course description approved by the Board of Education. Selected texts are submitted to the Board for approved use in classrooms with purchase ratio of one per student. The Public Hearing and Adoption of Resolution No. 08-17-18 of the Board of Education of Orange Unified School District on the sufficiency of textbooks, instructional materials and science lab equipment (9-12) was approved on October 5, 2017. Subject Textbooks and Instructional Materials/ Year of Adoption From Most Recent Adoption? Percent of Students Lacking Own Assigned Copy Reading/Language Arts School Facility Conditions and Planned Improvements (Most Recent Year) 2016-17 School Accountability Report Card for Page 3 of 9

School Facility Good Repair Status (Most Recent Year) Using the most recently collected FIT data (or equivalent), provide the following: Determination of repair status for systems listed Description of any needed maintenance to ensure good repair The year and month in which the data were collected The overall rating System Inspected Systems: Gas Leaks, Mechanical/HVAC, Sewer School Facility Good Repair Status (Most Recent Year) Year and month of the most recent FIT report: 9/29/2017 Repair Status Good Fair Poor Repair Needed and Action Taken or Planned Interior: Interior Surfaces 100 & 400 Bldg: Some carpets need to be replaced. Some rooms need painting 200 & 300 Bldg: Some carpets need to be replaced. Some rooms need painting Rooms 700 & 702, MPR, Kitchen: MPR could use painting and some floor repairs Cleanliness: Overall Cleanliness, Pest/ Vermin Infestation Electrical: Electrical Restrooms/Fountains: Restrooms, Sinks/ Fountains Safety: Fire Safety, Hazardous Materials Structural: Structural Damage, Roofs 600 Portables: Some damage to siding and roofing of portables; signs of water intrusion External: Playground/School Grounds, Windows/ Doors/Gates/Fences Overall Facility Rating (Most Recent Year) Year and month of the most recent FIT report: 9/29/2017 Exemplary Good Fair Poor Overall Rating 2016-17 School Accountability Report Card for Page 4 of 9

B. Pupil Outcomes State Priority: Pupil Achievement The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: Pupil Achievement (Priority 4): Statewide assessments (i.e., California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress [CAASPP] System, which includes the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments for students in the general education population and the California Alternate Assessments [CAAs] for English language arts/literacy [ELA] and mathematics given in grades three through eight and grade eleven. Only eligible students may participate in the administration of the CAAs. CAAs items are aligned with alternate achievement standards, which are linked with the Common Core State Standards [CCSS] for students with the most significant cognitive disabilities); and The percentage of students who have successfully completed courses that satisfy the requirements for entrance to the University of California and the California State University, or career technical education sequences or programs of study. CAASPP Test Results in English Language Arts/Literacy (ELA) and Mathematics for All Students Grades Three through Eight and Grade Eleven Subject English Language Arts/Literacy (grades 3-8 and 11) Percent of Students Meeting or Exceeding the State Standards (grades 3-8 and 11) School District State 2015-16 2016-17 2015-16 2016-17 2015-16 2016-17 72 72 53 54 48 48 Mathematics 62 60 40 40 36 37 (grades 3-8 and 11) Note: Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. CAASPP Test Results in ELA by Student Group Grades Three through Eight and Grade Eleven (School Year 2016-17) Student Group Total Enrollment Number Tested Percent Tested Percent Met or Exceeded All Students "1,208" "1,201" 99.42 72.02 Male 612 609 99.51 65.19 Female 596 592 99.33 79.05 Black or African American 15 15 100 53.33 American Indian or Alaska Native -- -- -- -- Asian 233 231 99.14 87.01 Filipino 36 36 100 83.33 Hispanic or Latino 217 214 98.62 59.35 Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander -- -- -- -- White 631 629 99.68 70.59 Two or More Races 41 41 100 75.61 Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 153 151 98.69 47.68 English Learners 89 84 94.38 35.71 Students with Disabilities 80 80 100 22.5 Foster Youth -- -- -- -- Note: ELA test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The Percent Met or Exceeded is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard (i.e., achieved Level 3 Alternate) on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. 2016-17 School Accountability Report Card for Page 5 of 9

Note: Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes all students who participated in the test whether they received a score or not; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using only students who received scores. CAASPP Test Results in Mathematics by Student Group Grades Three through Eight and Grade Eleven (School Year 2016-17) Student Group Total Enrollment Number Tested Percent Tested Percent Met or Exceeded All Students 1,208 1,206 99.83 60.28 Male 612 611 99.84 60.39 Female 596 595 99.83 60.17 Black or African American 15 15 100 40 American Indian or Alaska Native -- -- -- -- Asian 233 233 100 87.12 Filipino 36 36 100 77.78 Hispanic or Latino 217 217 100 41.01 Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander -- -- -- -- White 631 629 99.68 56.92 Two or More Races 41 41 100 51.22 Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 153 153 100 36.6 English Learners 89 89 100 26.97 Students with Disabilities 80 80 100 11.25 Foster Youth -- -- -- -- Note: Mathematics test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The Percent Met or Exceeded is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard (i.e., achieved Level 3 Alternate) on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. Note: Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The number of students tested includes all students who participated in the test whether they received a score or not; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using only students who received scores. CAASPP Test Results in Science for All Students Grades Five, Eight, and Ten Subject Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced School District State 2014-15 2015-16 2014-15 2015-16 2014-15 2015-16 Science (grades 5, 8, and 10) 94 92 68 64 60 56 Note: Science test results include California Standards Tests (CSTs), California Modified Assessment (CMA), and California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA) in grades five, eight, and ten. Note: Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Note: The 2016-17 data are not available. The California Department of Education is developing a new science assessment based on the Next Generation Science Standards for California Public Schools (CA NGSS). The new California Science Test (CAST) was piloted in spring 2017. The CST and CMA for Science will no longer be administered. 2016-17 School Accountability Report Card for Page 6 of 9

State Priority: Other Pupil Outcomes The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: Other Pupil Outcomes (Priority 8): Pupil outcomes in the subject areas of physical education. California Physical Fitness Test Results (School Year 2016-17) Grade Level Percent of Students Meeting Fitness Standards Four of Six Standards Five of Six Standards Six of Six Standards ---7--- 8 12.8 75.9 Note: Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. C. Engagement State Priority: Parental Involvement The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: Parental Involvement (Priority 3): Efforts the school district makes to seek parent input in making decisions for the school district and each schoolsite. Opportunities for Parental Involvement (School Year 2017-18) State Priority: School Climate The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: School Climate (Priority 6): Pupil suspension rates; Pupil expulsion rates; and Other local measures on the sense of safety. Suspensions and Expulsions Rate School District State 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Suspensions------- 5.4 5.7 2.4 2.8 3.1 3.0 3.8 3.7 3.6 Expulsions------- 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.0 0.1 0.1 0.1 School Safety Plan (School Year 2017-18) Each of the district s schools develops and adopts, in accordance with Education Code 32280 32289, a Comprehensive Safe School Plan particular to their site. Each school site is required annually, by March 1st, to have reviewed, and if necessary, updated their Safe School Plan. Each school forwards its Safe School Plan to the district through the office of Child Welfare and Attendance. The office of Child Welfare and Attendance provides plan development assistance to the schools and maintains a file of individual school plans available for inspection by the public. A comprehensive disaster plan is in effect and fire and/or earthquake drills are conducted monthly. All schools in the district are linked through an emergency radio contact system, and radio drills are held periodically to be prepared in case of an actual disaster. Providing a safe environment for our students is of paramount concern at California Elementary School. California Elementary School has an extensive disaster preparedness plan. Playground supervision is provided by certificated staff and noon supervisors to ensure student safety. All gates are locked during the day and visitors report through the office to sign-in and receive a pass. A Safe School Committee was established to analyze, modify and update the Safe School Plan annually to ensure everyone's safety and well being on the campus. 2016-17 School Accountability Report Card for Page 7 of 9

D. Other SARC Information The information in this section is required to be in the SARC but is not included in the state priorities for LCFF. Federal Intervention Program (School Year 2017-18) Program Improvement Status Indicator School District First Year of Program Improvement 2009-2010 Year in Program Improvement* Year 3 Number of Schools Currently in Program Improvement 11 Percent of Schools Currently in Program Improvement 73.3 Note: Cells with values do not require data. Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Secondary) Subject Avg. Class Size 2014-15 2015-16 2016-17 Number of Classrooms Avg. Number of Classrooms Avg. Number of Classrooms Class Class 1-22 23-32 33+ Size 1-22 23-32 33+ Size 1-22 23-32 33+ English------- 28 12 16 21 29 11 13 23 29 13 10 25 Mathematics 27 14 12 22 29 6 23 17 28 13 12 23 Science------- 34 3 6 26 33 3 5 27 37 2 3 28 Social Science 35 4 2 28 34 2 7 25 35 2 3 29 Note: Number of classes indicates how many classrooms fall into each size category (a range of total students per classroom). At the secondary school level, this information is reported by subject area rather than grade level. In PI Academic Counselors and Other Support Staff (School Year 2016-17) Academic Counselor------- Title Counselor (Social/Behavioral or Career Development) Library Media Teacher (Librarian) Library Media Services Staff (Paraprofessional) Psychologist------- Social Worker------- Nurse------- Speech/Language/Hearing Specialist Resource Specialist------- Other------- Note: Cells with values do not require data. Number of FTE Assigned to School Average Number of Students per Academic Counselor *One Full Time Equivalent (FTE) equals one staff member working full time; one FTE could also represent two staff members who each work 50 percent of full time. 2016-17 School Accountability Report Card for Page 8 of 9

Expenditures per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries (Fiscal Year 2015-16) Level Total Expenditures Per Pupil Supplemental/ Restricted Basic/ Unrestricted School Site------- 3.53 3.53 $5,702 0 Average Teacher Salary District------- $6139.09 $81,070 Percent Difference: School Site and District -7.1-100.0 State------- $6,574 $79,228 Percent Difference: School Site and State -13.3-100.0 Note: Cells with values do not require data. Types of Services Funded (Fiscal Year 2016-17) Teacher and Administrative Salaries (Fiscal Year 2015-16) Category District Amount State Average for Districts In Same Category Beginning Teacher Salary $45,001 $47,808 Mid-Range Teacher Salary $77,520 $73,555 Highest Teacher Salary $104,334 $95,850 Average Principal Salary (Elementary) $124,320 $120,448 Average Principal Salary (Middle) $130,865 $125,592 Average Principal Salary (High) $150,755 $138,175 Superintendent Salary $240,000 $264,457 Percent of Budget for Teacher Salaries 35% 35% Percent of Budget for Administrative Salaries 5% 5% For detailed information on salaries, see the CDE Certificated Salaries & Benefits Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/cs/. Professional Development (Most Recent Three Years) 2016-17 School Accountability Report Card for Page 9 of 9