School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

Similar documents
Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

George A. Buljan Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

El Toro Elementary School

Dyer-Kelly Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Bella Vista High School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

John F. Kennedy Middle School

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

Malcolm X Elementary School 1731 Prince Street Berkeley, CA (510) Grades K-5 Alexander Hunt, Principal

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

School Accountability Report Card Published During the School Year

San Luis Coastal Unified School District School Accountability Report Card Published During

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

Arthur E. Wright Middle School 1

Engage Educate Empower

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

John F. Kennedy Junior High School

Dr. Russell Johnson Middle School

Dr. Russell Johnson Middle School

Diablo Vista Middle 1

Cupertino High School Accountabiltiy Report Card. Kami Tomberlain, Principal FREMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

Iva Meairs Elementary School

Cupertino High School Accountabiltiy Report Card. Kami Tomberlain, Principal FREMONT UNION HIGH SCHOOL DISTRICT

Arthur E. Wright Middle School

Hokulani Elementary School

Val Verde Unified School District

Kahului Elementary School

Local Control and Accountability Plan and Annual Update Template

STAR Results. All Students. Percentage of Students Scoring at Proficient and Advanced Levels. El Rodeo BHUSD CA. Adequate Yearly Progress

Cooper Upper Elementary School

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Val Verde Unified School District

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

President Abraham Lincoln Elementary School

Shelters Elementary School

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Samuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate School

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

Description of Program Report Codes Used in Expenditure of State Funds

Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient

Cuero Independent School District

Summary of Selected Data Charter Schools Authorized by Alameda County Board of Education

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Alvin Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability

Orleans Central Supervisory Union

Missouri 4-H University of Missouri 4-H Center for Youth Development

UW-Waukesha Pre-College Program. College Bound Take Charge of Your Future!

Executive Summary. Walker County Board of Education. Dr. Jason Adkins, Superintendent 1710 Alabama Avenue Jasper, AL 35501

Milton Public Schools Fiscal Year 2018 Budget Presentation

Desert Valley High School SELF-STUDY REPORT

Hale`iwa. Elementary School Grades K-6. School Status and Improvement Report Content. Focus On School

12-month Enrollment

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

Charter School Reporting and Monitoring Activity

Lakewood Board of Education 200 Ramsey Avenue, Lakewood, NJ 08701

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

CDS Code

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

State Parental Involvement Plan

Lincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal

Local Educational Agency California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress Student Data File Layout

Executive Summary. Belle Terre Elementary School

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

Minnesota s Consolidated State Plan Under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

INDEPENDENT STUDY PROGRAM

Executive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY

Albemarle County Public Schools School Improvement Plan KEY CHANGES THIS YEAR

University of Arizona

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

RtI: Changing the Role of the IAT

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Personnel Administrators. Alexis Schauss. Director of School Business NC Department of Public Instruction

An Introduction to School Finance in Texas

Campus Diversity & Inclusion Strategic Plan

APPLICANT INFORMATION. Area Code: Phone: Area Code: Phone:

ESL Summer Camp: June 18 July 27, 2012 Homestay Application (Please answer all questions completely)

Educational Attainment

1.0 INTRODUCTION. The purpose of the Florida school district performance review is to identify ways that a designated school district can:

Data Diskette & CD ROM

Summary of Special Provisions & Money Report Conference Budget July 30, 2014 Updated July 31, 2014

Arlington Elementary All. *Administration observation of CCSS implementation in the classroom and NGSS in grades 4 & 5

Unequal Opportunity in Environmental Education: Environmental Education Programs and Funding at Contra Costa Secondary Schools.

Appendix K: Survey Instrument

Getting Results Continuous Improvement Plan

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

CSU East Bay EAP Breakfast. CSU Office of the Chancellor Student Academic Services Lourdes Kulju Academic Outreach and Early Assessment

Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey

Transportation Equity Analysis

Deer Valley High School WASC MID CYCLE REPORT

JOHN F. KENNEDY HIGH SCHOOL THREE-YEAR-TERM REVISIT VISITING COMMITTEE REPORT

Your Guide to. Whole-School REFORM PIVOT PLAN. Strengthening Schools, Families & Communities

Transcription:

Richfield Elementary School 23875 River Rd. Corning, CA 96021 530.824.3354 Grades K-8 Jeff Scheele, Principal jscheele@richfieldschool.org www.resd.tehama.k12.ca.us/ 2015-16 School Accountability Report Card Published During the 2016-17 School Year ---- ---- Richfield Elementary School District 23875 River Road Corning, CA 96021 (530) 824-3354 www.resd.tehama.k12.ca.us/ District Governing Board Mark Pritchard - President Courtney Daggoret - Clerk Jim Long Heather Jager Bryce Biswell District Administration Jeff Scheele Superintendent Mission Statement Richfield Elementary School's mission is to ensure a quality educational foundation for each student so that they may each realize their full potential as lifetime learners and responsible and productive members of our society. Richfield Core Values: Learning Richfield School believes that ALL STUDENTS can and will learn in a nurturing, safe, and supportive environment and will be given the tools to become life-long learners Community Richfield School believes that the school is the foundation of the community and requires a partnership among students, staff, parents, and community members which is characterized by mutual commitment and collaborative effort. Best Effort Richfield School believes that success can only be achieved through hard work, perseverance, commitment, and dedication in the classroom, during campus activities, within the community and at home. Continuous Improvement Richfield School will continually evaluate data and monitor progress and strive for continuous improvement. Ethical Behavior Richfield School believes our actions are distinguished by the highest standards of personal behavior, including trust, honesty, fairness, integrity, and mutual respect. Fiscal Responsibility The Richfield Board of Trustees shall strive to achieve an adequate reserve level of three months operating expenses for economic uncertainties while maintaining the best possible programs for students, competitive employee salaries and an attractive, safe, and secure campus. Richfield Elementary School is rurally located in Southern Tehama County. Serving approx. 240 students from Transitional Kindergarten through Eighth Grade, Richfield Elementary observes a traditional school calendar year. The entire school community along with the PTO continually works to enhance self-esteem and enrich the students life through meaningful learning activities that promote responsible behavior and academic success. Many parents can be found as classroom volunteers and sit on the School Site Council. All staff members work to provide students with rich, integrated, and well-coordinated curriculum following common core state standards. All students, staff and parents are expected to work to the best of their potential and strive for academic excellence. 2015-16 School Accountability Report Card for Richfield Elementary School Page 1 of 9

About the SARC By February 1 of each year, every school in California is required by state law to publish a School Accountability Report Card (SARC). The SARC contains information about the condition and performance of each California public school. Under the Local Control Funding Formula (LCFF) all local educational agencies (LEAs) are required to prepare a Local Control and Accountability Plan (LCAP), which describes how they intend to meet annual school-specific goals for all pupils, with specific activities to address state and local priorities. Additionally, data reported in an LCAP is to be consistent with data reported in the SARC. For more information about SARC requirements, see the California Department of Education (CDE) SARC Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/ta/ac/sa/. For more information about the LCFF or LCAP, see the CDE LCFF Web page at http://www.cde.ca.gov/fg/aa/lc/. For additional information about the school, parents/guardians and community members should contact the school principal or the district office. 2015-16 Student Enrollment by Grade Level Grade Level Number of Students Kindergarten 31 Grade 1 29 Grade 2 28 Grade 3 30 Grade 4 26 Grade 5 23 Grade 6 32 Grade 7 24 Grade 8 18 Total Enrollment 241 2015-16 Student Enrollment by Group Group Percent of Total Enrollment Black or African American 0.4 American Indian or Alaska Native 0.8 Asian 1.7 Filipino 0 Hispanic or Latino 42.3 Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander 0 White 51.9 Two or More Races 2.9 Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 57.7 English Learners 27.4 Students with Disabilities 4.6 Foster Youth 0.4 A. Conditions of Learning State Priority: Basic The SARC provides the following information relevant to the Basic State Priority (Priority 1): Degree to which teachers are appropriately assigned and fully credentialed in the subject area and for the pupils they are teaching; Pupils have access to standards-aligned instructional materials; and School facilities are maintained in good repair. Teacher Credentials Richfield Elementary School 14-15 15-16 16-17 With Full Credential 14 14 13 Without Full Credential 0 0 Teaching Outside Subject Area of Competence 0 0 Richfield Elementary School District 14-15 15-16 16-17 With Full Credential 13 Without Full Credential Teaching Outside Subject Area of Competence Teacher Misassignments and Vacant Teacher Positions at this School Richfield Elementary School 14-15 15-16 16-17 Teachers of English Learners 0 0 0 Total Teacher Misassignments 0 0 0 Vacant Teacher Positions 0 0 0 * Misassignments refers to the number of positions filled by teachers who lack legal authorization to teach that grade level, subject area, student group, etc. Total Teacher Misassignments includes the number of Misassignments of Teachers of English Learners. Core Academic Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers 2015-16 Percent of Classes In Core Academic Subjects Core Academic Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers Location of Classes Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers Not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers This School 100.0 0.0 Districtwide All Schools 100.0 0.0 High-Poverty Schools 100.0 0.0 Low-Poverty Schools 0.0 0.0 * High-poverty schools are defined as those schools with student eligibility of approximately 40 percent or more in the free and reduced price meals program. Low-poverty schools are those with student eligibility of approximately 39 percent or less in the free and reduced price meals program. 2015-16 School Accountability Report Card for Richfield Elementary School Page 2 of 9

Quality, Currency, Availability of Textbooks and Instructional Materials (School Year 2016-17) Every student has access to Common Core State Standards aligned instructional materials. Teachers make modifications to align lessons with CCSS. Core Curriculum Area Reading/Language Arts Mathematics Science History-Social Science Textbooks and Instructional Materials Year and month in which data were collected: 2017 - January Holt Rhinehart Adopted in 2004 Houghton Mifflin Adopted in 2004 Reading Mastery Textbooks and Instructional Materials/Year of Adoption The textbooks listed are from most recent adoption: Yes Eureka Math TK-8 The textbooks listed are from most recent adoption: Yes Harcourt Brace Adopted in 2004 The textbooks listed are from most recent adoption: Yes Holt Rhinehart Adopted in 2006 Scott Foresman Adopted in 2006 The textbooks listed are from most recent adoption: Yes Science Laboratory Equipment 2005-2016 School Facility Conditions and Planned Improvements (Most Recent Year) Richfield Elementary School campus has 13 classrooms, a science lab, a library, a computer lab, a gymnasium, administrative offices, and a cafeteria. Recently constructed in 2006, the facility is in excellent condition, maintained by a 3 member custodial/maintenance staff. Our campus has routine safety visits from North Valley Insurance Group. During these visits our System Inspected Systems: Gas Leaks, Mechanical/HVAC, Sewer Interior: Interior Surfaces Cleanliness: Overall Cleanliness, Pest/ Vermin Infestation Electrical: Electrical Restrooms/Fountains: Restrooms, Sinks/ Fountains Safety: Fire Safety, Hazardous Materials Structural: Structural Damage, Roofs External: Playground/School Grounds, Windows/ Doors/Gates/Fences School Facility Good Repair Status (Most Recent Year) Year and month in which data were collected: 2017 - January Repair Status Good Fair Poor Overall Rating Exemplary Good Fair Poor ---------- Repair Needed and Action Taken or Planned 2015-16 School Accountability Report Card for Richfield Elementary School Page 3 of 9

B. Pupil Outcomes State Priority: Pupil Achievement The SARC provides the following information relevant to the State priority: Pupil Achievement (Priority 4): Statewide assessments (i.e., California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress [CAASPP] System, which includes the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessments for students in the general education population and the California Alternate Assessments [CAAs] for English language arts/literacy [ELA] and mathematics given in grades three through eight and grade eleven. The CAAs have replaced the California Alternate Performance Assessment [CAPA] for ELA and mathematics, which were eliminated in 2015. Only eligible students may participate in the administration of the CAAs. CAA items are aligned with alternate achievement standards, which are linked with the Common Core State Standards [CCSS] for students with significant cognitive disabilities); and The percentage of students who have successfully completed courses that satisfy the requirements for entrance to the University of California and the California State University, or career technical education sequences or programs of study Subject 2015-16 CAASPP Results for All Students Percent of Students Meeting or Exceeding the State Standards (grades 3-8 and 11) School District State 14-15 15-16 14-15 15-16 14-15 15-16 ELA 46 55 46 55 44 48 Math 38 48 38 48 34 36 * Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Subject CAASPP Results for All Students - Three-Year Comparison Percent of Students Scoring at Proficient or Advanced (meeting or exceeding the state standards) School District State 13-14 14-15 15-16 13-14 14-15 15-16 13-14 14-15 15-16 Science 42 33 59 42 33 59 60 56 54 * Science test results include California Standards Tests (CSTs), California Modified Assessment (CMA), and California Alternate Performance Assessment (CAPA) in grades five, eight, and ten. Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Grade Level 2015-16 Percent of Students Meeting Fitness Standards 4 of 6 5 of 6 6 of 6 ---5--- 23.8 19 47.6 ---7--- 8.7 34.8 39.1 * Percentages are not calculated when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. Group 2015-16 CAASPP Results by Student Group Science (grades 5, 8, and 10) Number of Students Percent of Students Enrolled with Valid Scores w/ Valid Scores Proficient or Advanced All Students 40 39 97.5 59.0 Male 20 20 100.0 60.0 Female 20 19 95.0 57.9 Hispanic or Latino 12 11 91.7 9.1 White 26 26 100.0 80.8 Socioeconomically Disadvantaged 20 19 95.0 26.3 * Science test results include CSTs, CMA, and CAPA in grades five, eight, and ten. The Proficient or Advanced is calculated by taking the total number of students who scored at Proficient or Advanced on the science assessment divided by the total number of students with valid scores. Scores are not shown when the number of students tested is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. 2015-16 School Accountability Report Card for Richfield Elementary School Page 4 of 9

All Students Male Female Hispanic or Latino White Student Group Socioeconomically Disadvantaged English Learners School Year 2015-16 CAASPP Assessment Results - English Language Arts (ELA) Disaggregated by Student Groups, Grades Three through Eight and Eleven Grade Number of Students Enrolled Tested Tested Percent of Students Standard Met or Exceeded 3 32 31 96.9 38.7 4 25 25 100.0 36.0 5 22 21 95.5 57.1 6 33 31 93.9 63.3 7 24 23 95.8 73.9 8 18 18 100.0 66.7 3 18 18 100.0 22.2 4 14 14 100.0 35.7 6 18 17 94.4 47.1 7 11 10 90.9 60.0 8 11 11 100.0 72.7 3 14 13 92.9 61.5 4 11 11 100.0 36.4 5 13 12 92.3 58.3 6 15 14 93.3 84.6 7 13 13 100.0 84.6 3 12 11 91.7 27.3 4 11 11 100.0 45.5 6 16 14 87.5 64.3 3 18 18 100.0 50.0 4 13 13 100.0 30.8 5 12 12 100.0 83.3 6 15 15 100.0 57.1 7 11 11 100.0 90.9 8 14 14 100.0 85.7 3 20 19 95.0 36.8 4 14 14 100.0 28.6 5 11 10 90.9 20.0 6 25 23 92.0 63.6 7 12 11 91.7 54.5 6 14 12 85.7 58.3 ELA test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The Percent Met or Exceeded is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. The number of students tested includes all students who participated in the test whether they received a score or not; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using only students who received scores. 2015-16 School Accountability Report Card for Richfield Elementary School Page 5 of 9

All Students Male Female Hispanic or Latino White Student Group Socioeconomically Disadvantaged English Learners School Year 2015-16 CAASPP Assessment Results - Mathematics Disaggregated by Student Groups, Grades Three through Eight and Eleven Grade Number of Students Enrolled Tested Tested Percent of Students Standard Met or Exceeded 3 32 32 100.0 40.6 4 25 25 100.0 48.0 5 22 21 95.5 57.1 6 33 32 97.0 43.8 7 24 23 95.8 60.9 8 24 23 95.8 60.9 3 18 18 100.0 33.3 4 14 14 100.0 64.3 6 18 18 100.0 38.9 7 11 10 90.9 60.0 8 11 10 90.9 60.0 3 14 14 100.0 50.0 4 11 11 100.0 27.3 5 13 12 92.3 66.7 6 15 14 93.3 50.0 7 13 13 100.0 61.5 8 13 13 100.0 61.5 3 12 12 100.0 33.3 4 11 11 100.0 63.6 6 16 16 100.0 43.8 3 18 18 100.0 44.4 4 13 13 100.0 38.5 5 12 12 100.0 75.0 6 15 14 93.3 42.9 7 11 11 100.0 63.6 8 11 11 100.0 63.6 3 20 20 100.0 35.0 4 14 14 100.0 42.9 5 11 10 90.9 30.0 6 25 24 96.0 45.8 7 12 11 91.7 54.5 8 12 11 91.7 54.5 6 14 14 100.0 35.7 Mathematics test results include the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment and the CAA. The Percent Met or Exceeded is calculated by taking the total number of students who met or exceeded the standard on the Smarter Balanced Summative Assessment plus the total number of students who met the standard on the CAAs divided by the total number of students who participated in both assessments. Double dashes (--) appear in the table when the number of students is ten or less, either because the number of students in this category is too small for statistical accuracy or to protect student privacy. The number of students tested includes all students who participated in the test whether they received a score or not; however, the number of students tested is not the number that was used to calculate the achievement level percentages. The achievement level percentages are calculated using only students who received scores. 2015-16 School Accountability Report Card for Richfield Elementary School Page 6 of 9

C. Engagement State Priority: Parental Involvement The SARC provides the following information relevant to the Parental Involvement State Priority (Priority 3): Efforts the school district makes to seek parent input in making decisions for the school district and each schoolsite. Opportunities for Parental Involvement (School Year 2016-17) Contact Person Name: Emily Brooks Contact Person Phone Number: 530.824.3354 Richfield appreciates the involvement of parents in our school. Many parent volunteers help in the classroom, on field trips, at K and 8th grade graduation, in the snack bar as well as nearly all school events. Richfield has a dedicated and strong PTO that actively supports the students and staff. The P.T.O. raises money annually that goes directly to the benefit of all students. Teachers meet with parents before and after school, and at bi-annual conferences. Teachers also communicate electronically regularly via online grade books, email and other electronic applications. Richfield parents are encouraged to be an active force in our school. Parents hold seats on School Site Council, which also serves as the DSLT (District School Leadership Team) and the Safety Committee. Our site council and DSLT group guided the development of the LCAP. Parent surveys have been posted on our website and sent home to gain valuable feedback. We have an annual Grandparents Day Celebration, Ham Dinner, Family Science Night, Back to School Night etc. All events are very well attended by parents and the community. Richfield School also has a District English Learners Advisory Committee (DELAC). State Priority: School Climate The SARC provides the following information relevant to the School Climate State Priority (Priority 6): Pupil suspension rates; Pupil expulsion rates; and Other local measures on the sense of safety. School Safety Plan Richfield School District maintains a comprehensive school safety plan to ensure the safety of all students. Our School Site Council also serves as our Safety Commitee. Emergency drills are performed regularly throughout the year and regularly discussed with staff. Suspensions and Expulsions School 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Suspensions Rate 2.3 1.5 3.5 Expulsions Rate 0.0 0.0 0.0 District 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Suspensions Rate 2.3 1.5 3.5 Expulsions Rate 0.0 0.0 0.0 State 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 Suspensions Rate 4.4 3.8 3.7 Expulsions Rate 0.1 0.1 0.1 2015-16 School Accountability Report Card for Richfield Elementary School Page 7 of 9

D. Other SARC Information The information in this section is required to be in the SARC but is not included in the state priorities for LCFF. 2016-17 Federal Intervention Program Indicator School District Program Improvement Status In PI Not In PI First Year of Program Improvement 2013-2014 Year in Program Improvement Year 1 Number of Schools Currently in Program Improvement 1 Percent of Schools Currently in Program Improvement 100.0 Academic Counselors and Other Support Staff at this School Number of Full-Time Equivalent (FTE) Academic Counselor------- 0 Counselor (Social/Behavioral or Career Development).2 Library Media Teacher (Librarian) 0 Library Media Services Staff (Paraprofessional).4 Psychologist------- 0 Social Worker------- 0 Nurse-------.2 Speech/Language/Hearing Specialist.2 Resource Specialist------- 1 Other------- 1 Average Number of Students per Staff Member Academic Counselor------- 0 * One Full Time Equivalent (FTE) equals one staff member working full time; one FTE could also represent two staff members who each work 50 percent of full time. Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Elementary) Number of Classrooms* Average Class Size Grade 1-20 21-32 33+ 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 K 21 25 24 1 1 2 1 1 20 29 1 1.5 2 26 23 28 1.5 1 2 3 21 27 30 1 1 1 4 32 17 26 1 1 1 5 21 33 23 1 1 1 6 19 21 32 1 1 1 Average Class Size Average Class Size and Class Size Distribution (Secondary) Number of Classrooms* 1-22 23-32 33+ Subject 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 2013-14 2014-15 2015-16 English------- ---------- Mathematics ---------- Science------- ---------- Social Science *---------- Number of classes indicates how many classrooms fall into each size category (a range of total students per classroom). At the secondary school level, this information is reported by subject area rather than grade level. Professional Development provided for Teachers Richfield Elementary supports a variety of staff development opportunities to improve effectiveness of the instructional program. Staff are given opportunities to attend conferences, workshops, and seminars both within and outside the local area. Outside experts are also utilized in addition to staff lead professional development activities. Currently, our focus areas for PD include the CCSS, ELA adoption, ELD Standards, Eureka Math, CAASPP, NGSS/STEM, technology and Ren Place. 2015-16 School Accountability Report Card for Richfield Elementary School Page 8 of 9

FY 2014-15 Teacher and Administrative Salaries Category District Amount State Average for Districts In Same Category Beginning Teacher Salary $39,555 $41,085 Mid-Range Teacher Salary $52,172 $59,415 Highest Teacher Salary $72,132 $75,998 Average Principal Salary (ES) $100,438 Average Principal Salary (MS) $101,868 Average Principal Salary (HS) Superintendent Salary $96,320 $116,069 Percent of District Budget Teacher Salaries 38% 33% Administrative Salaries 5% 7% * For detailed information on salaries, see the CDE Certificated Salaries & Benefits webpage at www.cde.ca.gov/ds/fd/cs/. FY 2014-15 Expenditures Per Pupil and School Site Teacher Salaries Level Expenditures Per Pupil Total Restricted Unrestricted Average Teacher Salary School Site- 8,603.00 1,582.00 $7,021.00 56,283 District------ $7,048.00 $57,389 State------- $5,677 $60,985 Percent Difference: School Site/District -0.4-1.9 Percent Difference: School Site/ State 23.7-7.7 * Cells with do not require data. Types of Services Funded The Richfield District spent $8,603 per student for all educational service including transportation, health screening, instructional materials, curriculum, athletics and maintenance and operations. This includes funds spent for general education, special education and federal/state funded programs. DataQuest DataQuest is an online data tool located on the CDE DataQuest Web page at http://dq.cde.ca.gov/dataquest/ that contains additional information about this school and comparisons of the school to the district and the county. Specifically, DataQuest is a dynamic system that provides reports for accountability (e.g., test data, enrollment, high school graduates, dropouts, course enrollments, staffing, and data regarding English learners). Internet Access Internet access is available at public libraries and other locations that are publicly accessible (e.g., the California State Library). Access to the Internet at libraries and public locations is generally provided on a first-come, first-served basis. Other use restrictions may include the hours of operation, the length of time that a workstation may be used (depending on availability), the types of software programs available on a workstation, and the ability to print documents. 2015-16 School Accountability Report Card for Richfield Elementary School Page 9 of 9