Higher Learning Commission Accreditation Update. Monday, July 17, 2017

Similar documents
July 17, 2017 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL. John Tafaro, President Chatfield College State Route 251 St. Martin, OH Dear President Tafaro:

Michigan State University

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd. Hertfordshire International College

Marketing Committee Terms of Reference

ACCREDITATION STANDARDS

Education: Professional Experience: Personnel leadership and management

FRANKLIN D. CHAMBERS,

3/6/2009. Residence Halls & Strategic t Planning Overview. Residence Halls Overview. Residence Halls: Marapai Supai Kachina

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

Online Master of Business Administration (MBA)

VOL VISION 2020 STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION

Introduction 3. Outcomes of the Institutional audit 3. Institutional approach to quality enhancement 3

GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION

National and Regional performance and accountability: State of the Nation/Region Program Costa Rica.

Assumption University Five-Year Strategic Plan ( )

Position Statements. Index of Association Position Statements

The College of Law Mission Statement

The Ohio State University Library System Improvement Request,

Progress or action taken

Developing an Assessment Plan to Learn About Student Learning

NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Policy Manual

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

Presentation of the English Montreal School Board To Mme Michelle Courchesne, Ministre de l Éducation, du Loisir et du Sport on

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Process and Reports

School Leadership Rubrics

ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES WITHIN ACADEMIC PROGRAMS AT WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY

Program Change Proposal:

Mary Washington 2020: Excellence. Impact. Distinction.

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

Introduction: SOCIOLOGY AND PHILOSOPHY

Chapter 2. University Committee Structure

university of wisconsin MILWAUKEE Master Plan Report

Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan,

TABLE OF CONTENTS. By-Law 1: The Faculty Council...3

STUDENT EXPERIENCE a focus group guide

APPENDIX A-13 PERIODIC MULTI-YEAR REVIEW OF FACULTY & LIBRARIANS (PMYR) UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL

Guidelines for the Use of the Continuing Education Unit (CEU)

University of Michigan - Flint POLICY ON STAFF CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AND CONFLICTS OF COMMITMENT

The University of North Carolina Strategic Plan Online Survey and Public Forums Executive Summary

District Superintendent

Davidson College Library Strategic Plan

Envision Success FY2014-FY2017 Strategic Goal 1: Enhancing pathways that guide students to achieve their academic, career, and personal goals

The Teaching and Learning Center

1GOOD LEADERSHIP IS IMPORTANT. Principal Effectiveness and Leadership in an Era of Accountability: What Research Says

Self Assessment. InTech Collegiate High School. Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT

Pennsylvania Association of Councils of Trustees THE ROLE OF TRUSTEE IN PENNSYLVANIA S STATE SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION

2015 Academic Program Review. School of Natural Resources University of Nebraska Lincoln

CAREER SERVICES Career Services 2020 is the new strategic direction of the Career Development Center at Middle Tennessee State University.

FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY AT DODGE CITY

(2) "Half time basis" means teaching fifteen (15) hours per week in the intern s area of certification.

Woodhouse Primary School Sports Spending

Cultivating an Enriched Campus Community

Master of Science (MS) in Education with a specialization in. Leadership in Educational Administration

SHEEO State Authorization Inventory. Kentucky Last Updated: May 2013

CAUL Principles and Guidelines for Library Services to Onshore Students at Remote Campuses to Support Teaching and Learning

Northwest-Shoals Community College - Personnel Handbook/Policy Manual 1-1. Personnel Handbook/Policy Manual I. INTRODUCTION

Title Columbus State Community College's Master Planning Project (Phases III and IV) Status COMPLETED

Promotion and Tenure Guidelines. School of Social Work

University of Toronto

Texas Woman s University Libraries

WSU LIBRARIES DECISION MATRIX FY

Preliminary Report Initiative for Investigation of Race Matters and Underrepresented Minority Faculty at MIT Revised Version Submitted July 12, 2007

Services for Children and Young People

UNIVERSITY OF NORTH GEORGIA ADMINISTRATIVE / PROFESSIONAL PAY PLAN FISCAL YEAR 2015 BENEFITS-ELIGIBLE EXEMPT (MONTHLY) EMPLOYEES

Barstow Community College NON-INSTRUCTIONAL

The Characteristics of Programs of Information

SECTION I: Strategic Planning Background and Approach

March 28, To Zone Chairs and Zone Delegates to the USA Water Polo General Assembly:

Guidelines for Mobilitas Pluss top researcher grant applications

Strategic Plan SJI Strategic Plan 2016.indd 1 4/14/16 9:43 AM

Monitoring & Evaluation Tools for Community and Stakeholder Engagement

Comprehensive Student Services Program Review

Navitas UK Holdings Ltd Embedded College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education

Core Strategy #1: Prepare professionals for a technology-based, multicultural, complex world

THE ST. OLAF COLLEGE LIBRARIES FRAMEWORK FOR THE FUTURE

Wide Open Access: Information Literacy within Resource Sharing

GRADUATE ASSISTANTSHIP

2 Organizational. The University of Alaska System has six (6) Statewide Offices as displayed in Organizational Chart 2 1 :

MSW POLICY, PLANNING & ADMINISTRATION (PP&A) CONCENTRATION

Educational Leadership and Administration

Your Guide to. Whole-School REFORM PIVOT PLAN. Strengthening Schools, Families & Communities

Graduation Initiative 2025 Goals San Jose State

Developing a Distance Learning Curriculum for Marine Engineering Education

Title II of WIOA- Adult Education and Family Literacy Activities 463 Guidance

Dutchess Community College College Connection Program

An Introduction to LEAP

Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures

Tools to SUPPORT IMPLEMENTATION OF a monitoring system for regularly scheduled series

UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS AMHERST BOSTON DARTMOUTH LOWELL WORCESTER MINUTES OF THE MEETING OF THE COMMITTEE ON ACADEMIC AND STUDENT AFFAIRS

What does Quality Look Like?

Library & Information Services. Library Services. Academic Librarian (Maternity Cover) (Supporting the Cardiff School of Management)

EUA Annual Conference Bergen. University Autonomy in Europe NOVA University within the context of Portugal

EDUCATION AND DECENTRALIZATION

Texas Southern University FY 2014 Job Title List (By Alpha)

I set out below my response to the Report s individual recommendations.

Pattern of Administration. For the Department of Civil, Environmental and Geodetic Engineering The Ohio State University Revised: 6/15/2012

MILTON SANTIAGO, Ed.D.

School Balanced Scorecard 2.0 (Single Plan for Student Achievement)

Augusta University MPA Program Diversity and Cultural Competency Plan. Section One: Description of the Plan

Transcription:

Higher Learning Commission Accreditation Update Monday, July 17, 2017

Overall Progress Update EMU s scheduled all documents lock-in date: Friday, September 15, 2017 HLC Site Visit Dates: Monday-Tuesday, October 23-24, 2017 Overall Progress: Criterion Assurance Argument 85% complete Federal Compliance Review 75% complete Quality Initiative (academic advising) 95% complete Site Visit Logistics 10% complete

Assurance Argument for Five Criteria We argue that we have met HLC s five accreditation criteria (21 core components) Provide support evidence files All electronic-based So far, we have compiled 37,500 words of assurance argument (HLC s word count limit: 35,000), and gathered more than 270 evidence files

Criterion One. Mission CORE COMPONENT 1.A, The institution s mission is broadly understood within the institution and guides its operations. CORE COMPONENT 1.B, The mission is articulated publicly. CORE COMPONENT 1.C, The institution understands the relationship between its mission and the diversity of society. CORE COMPONENT 1.D, The institution s mission demonstrates commitment to the public good.

EMU s Mission and Vision EMU s MISSION: EMU enriches lives in a supportive, intellectually dynamic and diverse community. Our dedicated faculty balance teaching and research to prepare students with relevant skills and real world awareness. We are an institution of opportunity where students learn in and beyond the classroom to benefit the local and global communities. EMU s VISION: Eastern Michigan University will be a premier public university recognized for student-centered learning, high quality academic programs and community impact. Do we live/affirm our mission? And, if so how and where?

Assertions Criterion One In 2011, EMU reconvened the Institutional Strategic Planning Council (IPSC) to update and revise the University s Mission and Vision statement through a broad and inclusive process. (1.A.1) Our mission document clearly identifies the University s intention to be an institution of opportunity. EMU was most recently recognized by GI Jobs as one of the most military friendly institutions in the nation, one of the most LGBTQ friendly universities in the nation, and most recently launched a You are Welcome Here Campaign. (1.B.3)

Assertions Criterion One EMU has spent more than $230 million to fund improvements in academic and student-centered spaces. This includes more than $90 million for the self-funded Science Complex, the largest building project in the University s history, and $10 million for the Rackham Building, directed at improvements for health-related programs. (1.D.2)

Criterion Two. Integrity: Ethical and Responsible Conduct CORE COMPONENT 2.A, The institution operates with integrity in its financial, academic, personnel, and auxiliary functions; it establishes and follows policies and processes for fair and ethical behavior on the part of its governing board, administration, faculty, and staff. CORE COMPONENT 2.B, The institution presents itself clearly and completely to its students and to the public with regard to its programs, requirements, faculty and staff, costs to students, control, and accreditation relationships. CORE COMPONENT 2.C, The governing board of the institution is sufficiently autonomous to make decisions in the best interest of the institution and to assure its integrity.

Criterion Two. Integrity: Ethical and Responsible Conduct CORE COMPONENT 2.D, The institution is committed to freedom of expression and the pursuit of truth in teaching and learning. CORE COMPONENT 2.E, The institution s policies and procedures call for responsible acquisition, discovery and application of knowledge by its faculty, students and staff.

Criterion Two Assertions The accreditation review supports that EMU is significantly strong and successful in acting with integrity: ethically and responsibly in its conduct given the following: The transparency of EMU policies, protocols, and operational practices and the many means by which the community can engage with the integrity management of the institution. The robust systems of checks and balances EMU has in place to review and improve policy and protocol, reliance upon union contracts and agreements, avenues for receiving community feedback, and complaint processes. The significant technical and website development and improvements that support provision of information, opportunities for communication, consistency of practice, and continuity of services and programs.

Criterion Three. Teaching and Learning: Quality, Resources, and Support CORE COMPONENT 3.A, The institution s degree programs are appropriate to higher education. CORE COMPONENT 3.B, The institution demonstrates that the exercise of intellectual inquiry and the acquisition, application, and integration of broad learning and skills are integral to its educational programs. CORE COMPONENT 3.C, The institution has the faculty and staff needed for effective, high-quality programs and student services.

Criterion Three. Teaching and Learning: Quality, Resources, and Support CORE COMPONENT 3.D, The institution provides support for student learning and effective teaching. CORE COMPONENT 3.E, The institution fulfills the claims it makes for an enriched educational environment.

Criterion Three Assertions Eastern Michigan University is intentional in providing the resources, support, and processes for ensuring high quality teaching and learning. Rigorous course and program development processes, program review, strong articulation agreements, and shared governance structures provide appropriate degree programs to support student needs in the southeastern Michigan and the Great Lakes region. EMU has a strong tradition of and commitment to undergraduate research demonstrated by the oldest undergraduate research symposiums in the country. Student inquiry and intellectual acquisition are furthered by the recent investments into classroom technology and renovations to the Mark Jefferson Building/Science Complex, Pray Harrold, and Rackham Buildings. We consistently acquire and evaluate the appropriate number of and quality of faculty and staff, as well as provide professional development, to create a rich learning environment for students both within and outside the classroom.

Criterion Four. Teaching and Learning: Evaluation and Improvement CORE COMPONENT 4.A, The institution demonstrates responsibility for the quality of its educational programs. CORE COMPONENT 4.B, The institution demonstrates a commitment to educational achievement and improvement through ongoing assessment of student learning. CORE COMPONENT 4.C, The institution demonstrates a commitment to educational improvement through ongoing attention to retention, persistence, and completion rates in its degree and certificate programs.

Criterion Four Assertions The institution demonstrates responsibility for the quality of its educational programs, learning environments, and support services, and it evaluates their effectiveness for student learning through processes designed to promote continuous improvement. EMU has a robust process for assessing student learning from programmatic perspectives and using information gathered to improve programs and opportunities for students to learn. The five colleges, the General Education Program, Student Affairs and Student Services (SASS), and the University Library have assessment councils or committees, which are coordinated by the University Assessment Committee, that ensure that programs use assessment data to close the loop of assessment cycles. EMU has defined and ambitious goals for supporting student persistence toward degree completion; specific initiatives and practices are decentralized and are becoming more coordinated with the University s mission and resources.

Criterion Five. Resources, Planning, and Institutional Effectiveness CORE COMPONENT 5.A, The institution s resource base supports its current educational programs and its plans for maintaining and strengthening their quality in the future. CORE COMPONENT 5.B, The institution s governance and administrative structures promote effective leadership and support collaborative processes that enable the institution to fulfill its mission. CORE COMPONENT 5.C, The institution engages in systemic and integrated planning. CORE COMPONENT 5.D, The institution works systematically to improve its performance.

Criterion Five Assertions The institution engages in a systematic/integrated resource allocation process that prioritizes the educational mission over other areas. Largely incremental with input from the University Budget Council (UBC) and the Executive Council. The budget has focused on: 1) affordability (financial aid); 2) safety (officers/cameras/lighting); 3) student life (advisors); 4) athletics (total University experience); 5) capital (infrastructure) and 6) Academic Affairs (constant faculty staffing).

Assertions Criterion Five The institution employs policies and procedures to engage a knowledgeable governing board, administration, faculty, staff, and students. The Board of Regents meet 5-6 times annual plus workshops and retreats. Constituents take part in various committees (Faculty Affairs, Student Affairs, Ed. Policy, Athletics, Finance). The institution works systematically to improve its performance. Faculty - Rigorous hiring process, document performance, extensive annual evaluation process. Staff - Annual evaluation process linking goals/objectives to Strategic Plan. Financially - Annually audited with results publicly presented at the fall Board of Regents meeting and on EMU s homepage.

Areas Reviewed by Multiple Criteria Mission and Vision Strategic planning and investment Academic programs and quality Student success Financial challenges and EMU s responses

How you can help Continue to help criterion teams and federal compliance filing Inform your faculty and/or staff members about HLC accreditation (www.emich.edu/hlc) Help make logistic preparations for HLC s campus visit Participate in scheduled meetings and open forums during campus visit