Hoover Elementary School

Similar documents
Cooper Upper Elementary School

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Shelters Elementary School

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

John F. Kennedy Middle School

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

Newburgh Enlarged City School District Academic. Academic Intervention Services Plan

Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Annual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent

Data Diskette & CD ROM

Hokulani Elementary School

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

Kahului Elementary School

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

Getting Results Continuous Improvement Plan

TRANSFER APPLICATION: Sophomore Junior Senior

World s Best Workforce Plan

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

Port Jefferson Union Free School District. Response to Intervention (RtI) and Academic Intervention Services (AIS) PLAN

Institution of Higher Education Demographic Survey

The Condition of College & Career Readiness 2016

School Data Profile/Analysis

Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel

Bellevue University Admission Application

George A. Buljan Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Missouri 4-H University of Missouri 4-H Center for Youth Development

CONTINUUM OF SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES FOR SCHOOL AGE STUDENTS

Manasquan Elementary School State Proficiency Assessments. Spring 2012 Results

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

APPLICANT INFORMATION. Area Code: Phone: Area Code: Phone:

Educational Attainment

RAISING ACHIEVEMENT BY RAISING STANDARDS. Presenter: Erin Jones Assistant Superintendent for Student Achievement, OSPI

Bureau of Teaching and Learning Support Division of School District Planning and Continuous Improvement GETTING RESULTS

New Student Application. Name High School. Date Received (official use only)

Samuel Enoka Kalama Intermediate School

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

El Toro Elementary School

K-12 Academic Intervention Plan. Academic Intervention Services (AIS) & Response to Intervention (RtI)

Executive Summary. Walker County Board of Education. Dr. Jason Adkins, Superintendent 1710 Alabama Avenue Jasper, AL 35501

DATE ISSUED: 11/2/ of 12 UPDATE 103 EHBE(LEGAL)-P

Description of Program Report Codes Used in Expenditure of State Funds

TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES SUBTITLE A: EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION SUBCHAPTER b: PERSONNEL PART 25 CERTIFICATION

Executive Summary. Belle Terre Elementary School

Minnesota s Consolidated State Plan Under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)

Bella Vista High School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Arlington Elementary All. *Administration observation of CCSS implementation in the classroom and NGSS in grades 4 & 5

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

Testimony to the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions. John White, Louisiana State Superintendent of Education

President Abraham Lincoln Elementary School

UW-Waukesha Pre-College Program. College Bound Take Charge of Your Future!

Wisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

DIRECT CERTIFICATION AND THE COMMUNITY ELIGIBILITY PROVISION (CEP) HOW DO THEY WORK?

Executive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY


Orleans Central Supervisory Union

Demographic Survey for Focus and Discussion Groups

Updated: December Educational Attainment

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

PUBLIC INFORMATION POLICY

PROCEDURES FOR SELECTION OF INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS FOR THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF LODI

Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient

University of Arizona

BUILDING CAPACITY FOR COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS: LESSONS LEARNED FROM NAEP ITEM ANALYSES. Council of the Great City Schools

Rural Education in Oregon

Interview Contact Information Please complete the following to be used to contact you to schedule your child s interview.

SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Salem High School

Please complete these two forms, sign them, and return them to us in the enclosed pre paid envelope.

2012 ACT RESULTS BACKGROUND

Dyer-Kelly Elementary 1

Facts and Figures Office of Institutional Research and Planning

Dyer-Kelly Elementary School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

46 Children s Defense Fund

California State University, Los Angeles TRIO Upward Bound & Upward Bound Math/Science

State of New Jersey

Summary of Selected Data Charter Schools Authorized by Alameda County Board of Education

64% :Trenton High School. School Grade A; AYP-No. *FCAT Level 3 and Above: Reading-80%; Math-

OFFICE SUPPORT SPECIALIST Technical Diploma

Hale`iwa. Elementary School Grades K-6. School Status and Improvement Report Content. Focus On School

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

Executive Summary. Lincoln Middle Academy of Excellence

Miami-Dade County Public Schools

Trends & Issues Report

12-month Enrollment

Financing Education In Minnesota

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

CERTIFIED TEACHER LICENSURE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Arthur E. Wright Middle School 1

Bellehaven Elementary

Transportation Equity Analysis

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

Long Beach Unified School District

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

INTER-DISTRICT OPEN ENROLLMENT

Transcription:

LIVONIA PUBLIC SCHOOLS http://hoover.livoniapublicschools.org 214-215 BOARD OF EDUCATION 214-15 Colleen Burton, President Dianne Laura, Vice President Tammy Bonifield, Secretary Dan Centers, Trustee Liz Jarvis, Trustee Mark Johnson, Trustee Eileen McDonnell, Trustee Dr. Randy Liepa, Superintendent 159 Levan Livonia, MI 48154 734-744-273 Julie Linn, Principal

15125 Farmington Road Livonia MI 48154 Phone (734) 744-25 April 15, 216 Dear Parents and Community Members: I am pleased to present you with the (AER) which provides key information on the 214-215 educational progress for. The AER addresses the complex reporting information required by federal and state laws. The school s report contains information about student assessment, accountability and teacher quality. If you have any questions about the AER, please contact me, Julie Linn, Principal of, for assistance. The AER is available for you to review electronically by visiting the following web site http://hoover.livoniapublicschools.org or you may obtain a copy by contacting the Hoover Elementary School office. The AER has two major sections to it that are required by state law. The information contained in the first section was compiled by district staff. It presents relevant information about our district, our academic programs, school improvement efforts, two years of results on district developed assessments and nationally norm referenced assessments. It also includes the district s parent involvement policy and specialized programs. The second section of the report contains information provided by the Michigan Department of Education. Based on this data, our challenges are in the areas of science and math. Our school has identified underperforming subgroups of students, including: students with disabilities and economically disadvantaged students for whom additional intervention and support is needed in order to increase their proficiency and to close the achievement gap in the targeted areas. In place is a multi-tiered system of support, including the use of the research-based interventions, such as a reading program entitled Leveled Literacy Intervention. In addition, ongoing professional development and dialogue focusing on strategies to support struggling learners takes place regularly. Ongoing analysis of formative assessment to determine the needs of all students, followed by the provision of targeted learning intervention to students in need. We will purchase i-ready Math instruction licenses for our fourth grade students who are performing two or more years below grade level. These initiatives are intended to accelerate the student achievement of subgroups, including the state s Bottom 3%, that are not meeting our school s proficiency targets. Our collaborative efforts positively impact our school s success and student achievement. Sincerely, Julie Linn Principal 2

The Livonia Public Schools School prohibits unlawful discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, national origin, age, height, weight, marital status, handicap or disability in any of its educational programs or activities. The following person has been designated to handle inquiries regarding the nondiscrimination policies: Director of Human Resources, 15125 Farmington Road, Livonia, MI 48154 (734)744-25. SHARED VISION Climate and Environment We envision Hoover Elementary as a school where... the care, safety and well being of the members of our school community is of the utmost concern children are eager to attend, excited to learn and motivated to reach their greatest potential we value and respect the children entrusted in our care. Engaged Learners We envision Hoover Elementary as a school where... joy in learning abounds children are encouraged to give their personal best each day we work diligently to meet the unique learning and social emotional needs of our students high expectations for academic achievement and behavioral standards are evident Organizational Capability We envision Hoover Elementary as a school where... we value effective communication, positive relationships and collaborative efforts between parents, staff and students staff members are committed to individual and collective professional growth Outcomes for We envision Hoover elementary as a school where... the building blocks which are developed here serve as the foundation on which all future learning will be built amazing students, exceptional staff and dedicated parents work together to cultivate confidence and a belief in one s self We invite everyone in our school community to take an active role in bringing this vision to life. 3

MISSION STATEMENT Each day, Our mission at will provide a joyful & engaging environment, which inspires a love of learning. SCHOOL PROFILE serves 443 students in grades K-4. The principal of Hoover Elementary is Julie Linn, and there were 2 professional teaching staff members and a media specialist. In addition, there were the following professional support staff: school psychologist, school social worker, Elementary Support Teacher (E.S.T.), speech and language therapist, resource classroom teacher, teacher consultant outreach, occupational and physical therapist, and homebound or hospitalized services. Assisting all of us in keeping the building operating in an organized manner, keeping the building clean, serving nutritious food, and helping teachers and students are: custodians, secretaries, paraprofessionals, and lunchroom personnel. State law requires that we report the following additional information. ASSIGNING PUPILS TO THE SCHOOL All students were assigned to Hoover Elementary based upon attendance within the geographic boundaries of the school as well as students who transfer in based upon seats available. SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT School improvement is a process in which stakeholders in a school work cooperatively to improve student achievement. The process relies on staff, parents, and students participating in collaborative decision making in formulating and implementing achievement goals. The goals are determined through analysis of student achievement data and survey information. Action plans using proven interventions are developed for each improvement goal and progress toward achievement of the goals is documented annually. 4

Our school improvement goal for 214-215 and 213-214 was: All students at Hoover Elementary will be proficient in math, reading, writing and science. We are very encouraged by the student achievement results from the school-wide literacy initiative and our school writing assessments. The Livonia Public Schools School has had its Level accreditation through AdvanceEd. Through the district accreditation process, also received AdvancED accreditation. The AdvancED accreditation process supports and validates district and school level improvement efforts. SPECIALIZED SCHOOLS OR PROGRAMS At the elementary level, students may be enrolled in Alternative Classrooms for the Academically Talented (ACAT) at Webster Elementary School and special education centers at Buchanan, Cass, Coolidge, Riley, Cooper and Johnson. Preschool special education programs were located at Perrinville Early Childhood Center. Other special education programs are available in western Wayne County for our students with disabilities, based upon their individual needs. Niji-Iro Japanese Immersion Elementary School was open this year at the former Taylor Elementary School. A preschool is operated at the Jackson Center. Specific information about these programs is available on the district Web site at www.livoniapublicschools.org. CORE CURRICULUM The core curriculum at Hoover Elementary provides learning experiences in reading, writing, speaking, listening, spelling, handwriting, mathematics, social studies, science, technology, health, physical education, art, vocal music, and enrichment activities. The core curriculum is based on the grade level content expectations (GLCEs) from the Michigan Department of Education and the Common Core State Standards for and English Language Arts. The goal of education is to provide all learners with a solid foundation of skills, knowledge, and understandings that are necessary for their continual growth and success as students within the school setting and as adults in society. As a result of sound K-12 education based on well defined educational outcomes, a Livonia Public School graduate will: Respect self, others, and the environment. Communicate effectively. Know how to learn and work productively. Acquire and process information. Use critical and creative thinking to make decisions and solve problems. Work and participate independently and cooperatively. Acquire a core of understanding and competencies within the content areas. A copy of the core curriculum may be obtained from the district s Academic Services Department. 5

STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT ON DISTRICT DEVELOPED AND NATIONAL ASSESSMENTS DISTRICT LITERACY ASSESSMENTS in kindergarten are assessed on a one-on-one basis regularly during the school year to measure progress toward grade-level literacy skills. The following table, Early Literacy Benchmark Assessment - Kindergarten, shows the results of this testing by school and district. EARLY LITERACY BENCHMARK ASSESSMENT - KINDERGARTEN 214-215 Letter Identification Letter Sounds Rhyme Hoover 1% 98.6% 98.6% 93.5% 85.7% 94.9% 213-214 Hoover 1% 1% 98.9% 96.6% 98.3% 95.6% in grades 1-4 are assessed using the Fountas and Pinnell Benchmark Assessment System. Teachers administer running records with comprehension to students one-on-one. Kindergarten teachers administer reading records with comprehension at the end of the school year. in grades 1-2 are assessed a minimum of four times each year. in grades 3-4 are assessed a minimum of two times each year. The following table shows the percent of students at each grade level that performed at or above grade level on this assessment. FOUNTAS AND PINNELL BENCHMARK ASSESSMENTS GRADES K-4 of that Performed At or Above Grade Level Spring 215 Kindergarten Grade 1 Grade 2 Grade 3 Grade 4 Hoover 97.3% 96% 87% 89% 92% 89.5% 78% 8% 83% 88% Spring 214 Hoover 94.6% 93% 85% 88% 95% 85.6% 8% 83% 83% 88% 6

DISTRICT MATHEMATICS ASSESSMENTS - ELEMENTARY were assessed in mathematics knowledge twice during the 214-15 school year. Kindergarten students were assessed with a Pre/Post assessment created by the district and students in grades 1-5 were assessed using a Pre/Post online assessment. In September and March, students in Kindergarten were tested in September and March on Common Core State Standards for (CCSS) strands taught within the Everyday program. in grades 1-5 were tested on Common Core State Standards for (CCSS) and reported using Grade Level Expectations (GLCEs) strands taught within the Everyday program. The following data show the percentage of students who were proficient at each grade level on the Pre/Post mathematics benchmark assessment. MATHEMATICS BENCHMARK: ELEMENTARY ASSESSMENTS GRADE Kindergarten of KINDERGARTEN 214-215 Counting & Cardinality Geometry Measurement & Data Number & Operations in Base Ten Operations & Algebraic Thinking Totals* Pre-Test Hoover 12% 36% 69% % 23% 14% 11% 35% 51% 5% 25% 11% Post-Test Hoover 97% 99% 1% N/A** 91% 99% 87% 91% 94% N/A** 83% 9% 213-214 Pre-Test Hoover 14% 21% 59% 2% 19% 5% 1% 21% 61% 4% 2% 7% Post-Test Hoover 99% 1% 99% 89% 98% 99% 87% 93% 94% 7% 9% 91% *Total score indicates percentage of students scoring 7% or higher. **Due to the fact the Post-Test was administered earlier in the school year than in previous years, test items reflecting content not taught were eliminated. 7

MATHEMATICS BENCHMARK: ELEMENTARY ASSESSMENTS GRADES 1-4 of GRADE 1 Numbers & Numeration Operations & Computations Measurement Reference Frames Patterns, Functions, Algebra Data & Chance 214-215 Geometry Pre-Test Hoover 62% 68% 37% 78% 61% 51% 57% 56% 6% 33% 66% 5% 44% 51% Post-Test Hoover 94% 99% 78% 94% 95% 9% 91% 85% 91% 63% 86% 86% 82% 82% 213-214 Pre-Test Hoover 48% 6% 1% 69% 29% 23% 62% 57% 63% 35% 63% 51% 48% 52% Post-Test Hoover 92% 97% 64% 83% 89% 74% 88% 88% 93% 59% 87% 83% 71% 86% GRADE 2 Numbers & Numeration Operations & Computations Measurement Reference Frames Patterns, Functions, Algebra Data & Chance Totals* 214-215 Geometry Pre-Test Hoover 7% 57% 77% 88% 65% 88% 7% 62% 47% 68% 82% 56% 78% 62% Post-Test Hoover 82% 75% 9% 95% 71% 95% 83% 78% 65% 83% 92% 69% 91% 77% 213-214 Pre-Test Hoover 33% 12% 56% 65% 19% 75% 64% 6% 45% 69% 8% 56% 77% 61% Post-Test Hoover 7% 49% 9% 86% 26% 89% 83% 82% 71% 88% 95% 71% 94% 82% GRADE 3 Numbers & Numeration Operations & Computations Measurement Reference Frames Patterns, Functions, Algebra Data & Chance Totals* 214-215 Geometry Pre-Test Hoover 75% 6% 66% 57% 73% 84% 67% 74% 54% 66% 56% 71% 8% 65% Post-Test Hoover 9% 77% 88% 86% 91% 95% 89% 86% 86% 81% 77% 85% 89% 82% 213-214 Pre-Test Hoover 59% 25% 5% 34% 57% 58% 7% 75% 54% 69% 57% 71% 8% 66% Post-Test Hoover 9% 77% 84% 7% 86% 8% 89% 86% 78% 83% 74% 84% 89% 82% 8 Totals*

Numbers & Numeration Operations & Computations Measurement Reference Frames GRADE 4 Patterns, Functions, Algebra Data & Chance 214-215 Geometry Totals* Pre-Test Hoover 41% 51% 39% 62% 45% 66% 48% 4% 45% 39% 66% 44% 59% 46% Post-Test Hoover 78% 76% 72% 92% 74% 84% 78% 68% 64% 58% 88% 67% 74% 68% 213-214 Pre-Test Hoover 4% 2% 1% 37% 6% 12% 46% 39% 45% 39% 7% 42% 61% 46% Post-Test Hoover 66% 59% 48% 98% 67% 42% 8% 71% 69% 66% 88% 7% 76% 72% *Total score indicates proficiency in all 6 strands. NORM REFERENCED ASSESSMENT The Cognitive Ability Test (CogAT) from Riverside Publishing is administered to third grade students. CogAT GRADE 3 Age iles 214-15 Verbal Quantitative Nonverbal Composite Hoover 59 65 65 64 53 63 6 59 213-214 Hoover 53 63 62 6 51 62 58 58 PARENT TEACHER CONFERENCES One of the most important factors of a child s success in school is the involvement of parents or guardians in the educational process. Hoover Elementary has a high degree of parental involvement as 98% of our parents (representing 434 students) attending parent-teacher conferences in 214-215 and 89% of our parents (representing 457 students) attended parent-teacher conferences in 213-214. During 214-215, 91% of students families (representing 44 students) were represented at Open House. 9

PARENT INVOLVEMENT The district s Parent Involvement Plan is available on the district s website, which is linked to each school s website. BOARD POLICY IDD(1) PARENT INVOLVEMENT JUNE 2, 211 The Board strongly encourages and welcomes the involvement of parent(s)/guardian(s) in all of the s educational programs. It is recognized and appreciated that parents/guardians are the first teachers of their children, and that their interest and involvement in the education of their children should not diminish once their child enters the schools of the. Accordingly, the Board directs, by the adoption of this policy, that the administration shall design a program/plan that will encourage parent(s)/guardian(s) participation that may include, but not be limited to: The development and review of instructional materials; input on the ways that the may better provide parent(s)/guardian(s) with information concerning current laws, regulations, and instructional programs; and offerings of training programs to instruct parent(s)/guardian(s) how to become more involved in their child s educational programs. Pursuant to state law, the Superintendent shall provide a copy of the s Parental Involvement plan to all parents. Reference: 2 USCA 6316, 2 USCA 6318 (No Child Left Behind Act) 1

DATA FROM MICHIGAN DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION The explanation below is provided by Livonia Public Schools to assist you in understanding the data on the following pages provided by the Michigan Department of Education (MDE). Student Assessment Data State assessment results at the elementary, middle and high school levels for all four tested subjects (mathematics, ELA, science and social studies) for all students as well as subgroups of students on the: M-STEP and MI-Access for 214-15 and MEAP, MME, MEAP-Access and MI-Access for 213-14. Accountability Details Subject Data provides the percent of students tested and the percent proficient for each subject area tested (mathematics, ELA, science and social studies) at the state and district levels for all students and applicable student subgroups. Graduation Data provides high school graduation rates at the state and district levels for all students and applicable subgroups. Attendance Data provides average daily attendance rate at the state and district levels. Accountability Status and School Data The MDE did not provide any data for these categories. Teacher Quality identifies teacher qualifications, reports percentage of core academic classes taught by teachers not considered highly qualified to teach such classes, and lists the percentage of teachers with emerging certifications in the district. NAEP Data (National Assessment of Education Progress) Provides state results of the national assessment in mathematics and reading in grades 4, 8 and 12. The following pages are provided by the Michigan Department of Education and cannot be amended, modified or adjusted. They must be included as provided by the state. 11

3/23/216 M-STEP Grades 3-8 Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State School Advanced Partially Not All 213-14 61.3% 7.8% 75% 14.8% 6.2% 21.6% 3.4% African 213-14 37.3% 38.6% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Asian 213-14 76.2% 8% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Hispanic of Any Race Two or More Races 213-14 46.9% 65.1% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 213-14 61.8% 72.7% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 White 213-14 68.8% 74.5% 76.3% 15.8% 6.5% 21.1% 2.6% Female 213-14 64.1% 77.6% 93.9% 18.2% 75.8% 3% 3% Male 213-14 58.6% 64.4% 63.6% 12.7% 5.9% 32.7% 3.6% Economically Disadvantaged 213-14 47.9% 55.9% 72.7% % 72.7% 27.3% % A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 1 of 3

3/23/216 M-STEP Grades 3-8 Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State School Advanced Partially Not English Language Learners With Disabilities 213-14 37.2% 5% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 213-14 35.1% 41.1% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 All 214-15 5% 54.7% 73.9% 43.5% 3.4% 17.4% 8.7% All 213-14 7% 78.1% 87.4% 14.6% 72.8% 1.7% 1.9% African African 214-15 23.2% 15.7% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 213-14 47.6% 56.5% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Asian 214-15 69.7% 7% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Asian 213-14 81.1% 93.9% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Hispanic of Any Race 214-15 37.2% 5% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 2 of 3

3/23/216 M-STEP Grades 3-8 Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State School Advanced Partially Not Two or More Races Two or More Races 214-15 47.7% 45.7% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 213-14 71.2% 82.4% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 White 214-15 58.2% 59% 75% 43.8% 31.3% 17.5% 7.5% White 213-14 76.5% 79.3% 88.3% 16% 72.3% 9.6% 2.1% Female 214-15 54.7% 58.1% 76.7% 55.8% 2.9% 18.6% 4.7% Female 213-14 73% 83.1% 93.3% 15.6% 77.8% 6.7% % Male 214-15 45.5% 51.1% 71.4% 32.7% 38.8% 16.3% 12.2% Male 213-14 67% 73.5% 82.8% 13.8% 69% 13.8% 3.4% Economically Disadvantaged 214-15 35.3% 35.6% 5% 21.4% 28.6% 21.4% 28.6% A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 3 of 3

3/23/216 M-STEP Grades 3-8 Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State School Advanced Partially Not Economically Disadvantaged 213-14 57.3% 65.4% 76.9% 7.7% 69.2% 23.1% % English Language Learners English Language Learners With Disabilities With Disabilities 214-15 34.7% 29% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 213-14 42.9% 45.5% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 214-15 23.3% 27.9% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 213-14 41.6% 44.7% 72.2% % 72.2% 16.7% 11.1% All 214-15 46.6% 48.2% 6.2% 33% 27.3% 22.7% 17% African 214-15 21.2% 15.9% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Asian 214-15 7.5% 62.1% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Hispanic of Any Race 214-15 33.2% 51.1% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 4 of 3

3/23/216 M-STEP Grades 3-8 Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State School Advanced Partially Not Two or More Races 214-15 45.5% 48.8% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 White 214-15 53.9% 51.8% 62.7% 34.7% 28% 22.7% 14.7% Female 214-15 51.5% 56.8% 7.3% 43.2% 27% 16.2% 13.5% Male 214-15 41.8% 4.3% 52.9% 25.5% 27.5% 27.5% 19.6% Economically Disadvantaged 214-15 3.9% 3.3% 4% 13.3% 26.7% 26.7% 33.3% English Language Learners With Disabilities 214-15 23.7% 35.9% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 214-15 17.2% 19.2% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 All 213-14 4.1% 55.1% 55.1% 16.9% 38.2% 23.6% 21.3% African 213-14 18.2% 2.2% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Asian 213-14 66% 64% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 5 of 3

3/23/216 M-STEP Grades 3-8 Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State School Advanced Partially Not Hispanic of Any Race 213-14 26.3% 46.5% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Two or More Races 213-14 38.1% 42.4% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 White 213-14 46.6% 6.2% 58.4% 16.9% 41.6% 2.8% 2.8% Female 213-14 39.7% 56.2% 7.6% 17.6% 52.9% 14.7% 14.7% Male 213-14 4.6% 54.1% 45.5% 16.4% 29.1% 29.1% 25.5% Economically Disadvantaged 213-14 26.9% 38.6% 41.7% % 41.7% 16.7% 41.7% English Language Learners 213-14 26.4% 37.1% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 With Disabilities 213-14 22.2% 27.3% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 All 214-15 48.8% 61.3% 72.8% 3.4% 42.4% 2.7% 6.5% All 213-14 45.3% 62.5% 69.9% 17.5% 52.4% 16.5% 13.6% African 214-15 2.3% 22.7% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 African 213-14 18.2% 23.5% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 6 of 3

3/23/216 M-STEP Grades 3-8 Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State School Advanced Partially Not Asian 214-15 73.6% 82% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Asian 213-14 69.2% 87.9% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Hispanic of Any Race 214-15 35.7% 53.8% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Two or More Races 214-15 43.6% 48.6% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Two or More Races 213-14 43.8% 55.9% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 White 214-15 57.3% 65.6% 75% 27.5% 47.5% 18.8% 6.3% White 213-14 52.9% 65% 7.2% 18.1% 52.1% 18.1% 11.7% Female 214-15 48.1% 6.3% 69.8% 3.2% 39.5% 25.6% 4.7% Female 213-14 43.4% 6.3% 71.1% 2% 51.1% 17.8% 11.1% Male 214-15 49.5% 62.3% 75.5% 3.6% 44.9% 16.3% 8.2% Male 213-14 47.2% 64.5% 69% 15.5% 53.4% 15.5% 15.5% Economically Disadvantaged Economically Disadvantaged 214-15 33.5% 4.3% 35.7% 7.1% 28.6% 5% 14.3% 213-14 29.5% 39.8% 61.5% % 61.5% 23.1% 15.4% A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 7 of 3

3/23/216 M-STEP Grades 3-8 Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State School Advanced Partially Not English Language Learners 214-15 37% 54% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 English Language Learners 213-14 23.1% 29.2% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 With Disabilities 214-15 24.5% 32.9% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 With Disabilities 213-14 23.2% 37.8% 38.9% % 38.9% 27.8% 33.3% All 214-15 41.4% 5.7% 56.8% 26.1% 3.7% 35.2% 8% African 214-15 13.2% 11.4% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Asian 214-15 69.7% 64.5% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Hispanic of Any Race 214-15 27.1% 41.3% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Two or More Races 214-15 38.2% 5% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 White 214-15 49.3% 55.8% 56% 29.3% 26.7% 36% 8% Female 214-15 4.3% 52.2% 62.2% 35.1% 27% 32.4% 5.4% Male 214-15 42.4% 49.3% 52.9% 19.6% 33.3% 37.3% 9.8% A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 8 of 3

3/23/216 M-STEP Grades 3-8 Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State School Advanced Partially Not Economically Disadvantaged 214-15 25.4% 32.3% 26.7% % 26.7% 6% 13.3% English Language Learners 214-15 22.1% 36.6% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 With Disabilities 214-15 17.2% 22.5% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Science All 214-15 12.4% 16.2% 22.7% 5.7% 17% 42% 35.2% Science African 214-15 2% 2.3% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Science Asian 214-15 23.9% 29% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Science Hispanic of Any Race 214-15 5.5% 12.8% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Science Two or More Races 214-15 11.8% 12.2% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Science Science Science Science White 214-15 15.4% 17.9% 22.7% 5.3% 17.3% 44% 33.3% Female 214-15 1.4% 14.7% 21.6% 5.4% 16.2% 51.4% 27% Male 214-15 14.3% 17.5% 23.5% 5.9% 17.6% 35.3% 41.2% Economically Disadvantaged 214-15 5.5% 5.6% 13.3% % 13.3% 26.7% 6% A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 9 of 3

3/23/216 M-STEP Grades 3-8 Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State School Advanced Partially Not Science English Language Learners 214-15 2.2% 4.9% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Science With Disabilities 214-15 4.6% 4.1% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 1 of 3

3/23/216 M-STEP Grade 11 Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State School Advanced Partially Not No Data to Display A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 11 of 3

3/23/216 Michigan Educational Assessment Program Access (MEAP - Access) Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State School Exceeded Met Progressing 4th All 213-14 55.3% 57.9% <1 <1 <1 <1 4th White 213-14 59.8% 52.9% <1 <1 <1 <1 4th Female 213-14 53.7% 4% <1 <1 <1 <1 4th English Language Learners 213-14 46.2% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 Reading 4th All 213-14 45.6% 38.1% <1 <1 <1 <1 Reading 4th White 213-14 5.1% 36.8% <1 <1 <1 <1 Reading 4th Female 213-14 46.2% 42.9% <1 <1 <1 <1 Reading 4th English Language Learners 213-14 32.4% <1 <1 <1 <1 <1 A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 12 of 3

3/23/216 MI-Access Functional Independence Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State School Surpassed Attained Emerging No Data to Display A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 13 of 3

3/23/216 MI-Access Supported Independence Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State School Surpassed Attained Emerging No Data to Display A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 14 of 3

3/23/216 MI-Access Participation Subject Grade Testing Group School Year State School Surpassed Attained Emerging No Data to Display A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 15 of 3

3/23/216 Accountability Details Subject Data Testing Group Subject State Tested Total State Tested Total * School Tested Total School ** All 98.1% 36.5% 99.1% N/A 98.9% N/A All ELA 98.1% 48.5% 99.2% N/A 98.9% N/A All Science 97.5% 22.2% 98.9% N/A 1% N/A All Social Studies 97.4% 31.8% 99.1% N/A N/A N/A Indian Indian Indian Indian African African African African 98.2% 27.8% <3 N/A N/A N/A ELA 98% 41.5% <3 N/A N/A N/A Science 97.8% 17.7% <3 N/A N/A N/A Social Studies 97.2% 25.2% <3 N/A N/A N/A 96.5% 13.5% 99.4% N/A <3 N/A ELA 96.5% 24.5% 99.4% N/A <3 N/A Science 95.4% 6.1% 98.6% N/A <3 N/A Social Studies 95.2% 11% 98.9% N/A N/A N/A Asian 99.1% 66.3% 99% N/A <3 N/A Asian ELA 98.7% 7.2% 98.7% N/A <3 N/A Asian Science 99% 38% 98.2% N/A <3 N/A Asian Social Studies 98.8% 49.6% 99.2% N/A N/A N/A Hispanic of Any Race Hispanic of Any Race Hispanic of Any Race Hispanic of Any Race Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 98.3% 23.7% 98.3% N/A <3 N/A ELA 98.3% 36.1% 99.7% N/A <3 N/A Science 97.9% 11.7% 98.7% N/A <3 N/A Social Studies 97.5% 2.2% 98.1% N/A N/A N/A 99.8% 4.8% N/A N/A N/A N/A A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 16 of 3

3/23/216 Accountability Details Subject Data Testing Group Subject State Tested Total State Tested Total * School Tested Total School ** Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander Two or More Races Two or More Races Two or More Races Two or More Races ELA 99.3% 53.3% N/A N/A N/A N/A Science 99.6% 21.9% N/A N/A N/A N/A Social Studies 99.3% 33% N/A N/A N/A N/A 98.5% 33.6% 1% N/A <3 N/A ELA 98.5% 46.9% 1% N/A <3 N/A Science 98.5% 2.1% 1% N/A <3 N/A Social Studies 98.1% 28.3% 1% N/A N/A N/A White 98.5% 42.5% 99.1% N/A 99.4% N/A White ELA 98.5% 55% 99.2% N/A 99.4% N/A White Science 98.1% 26.6% 98.9% N/A 1% N/A White Social Studies 98% 37.3% 99.1% N/A N/A N/A Economically Disadvantaged Economically Disadvantaged Economically Disadvantaged Economically Disadvantaged English Language Learners English Language Learners English Language Learners 97.6% 22.5% 99.2% N/A <3 N/A ELA 97.6% 33.7% 99.4% N/A <3 N/A Science 96.8% 11.7% 98.9% N/A <3 N/A Social Studies 96.5% 17.8% 98.8% N/A N/A N/A 98.6% 2.3% 97.2% N/A <3 N/A ELA 98.2% 24% 99.2% N/A <3 N/A Science 98.2% 3.9% 97.9% N/A <3 N/A A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 17 of 3

3/23/216 Accountability Details Subject Data Testing Group Subject State Tested Total State Tested Total * School Tested Total School ** English Language Learners With Disabilities With Disabilities With Disabilities With Disabilities Social Studies 97.9% 8.1% 97.4% N/A N/A N/A 97.2% 21.8% 98.6% N/A <3 N/A ELA 96.6% 24.7% 98.4% N/A <3 N/A Science 96.5% 15.4% 98.3% N/A <3 N/A Social Studies 95% 13.9% 98.9% N/A N/A N/A A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 18 of 3

3/23/216 Accountability Details Graduation Data Testing Group Statewide School All 78.6% 92.7% N/A Indian 64.8% N/A N/A African 64.5% 82.7% N/A Asian 89.1% 91.7% N/A Hispanic of Any Race 68.8% 89.7% N/A Migrant 63.2% N/A N/A Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander 78.9% N/A N/A Two or More Races 74.2% 93.3% N/A White 82.9% 93.8% N/A Female 82.9% N/A N/A Male 74.4% N/A N/A Economically Disadvantaged 65.6% 82.9% N/A English Language Learners 68.2% N/A N/A With Disabilities 55.1% 59.% N/A Homeless 54.% N/A N/A * All data based on students enrolled for a full academic year. A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 19 of 3

3/23/216 Accountability Details Attendance Data Testing Group Statewide School All 94.7% 96.6% 97.% * All data based on students enrolled for a full academic year. A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 2 of 3

3/23/216 Accountability Status Data Name Reading Status Reading Score Writing Status Writing Score Math Status Math Score Science Status Science Score Social Studies Status Social Studies Score Overall Status Overall Score No Data to Display A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 21 of 3

3/23/216 Accountability Status School Data Name School Name Title 1 Status Reading Status Reading Score Writing Status Writing Score Math Status Math Score Science Status Science Score Social Studies Status Social Studies Score Overall Status Overall Score No Data to Display A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 22 of 3

3/23/216 Teacher Quality - Qualification Professional Qualifications of All Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers in the School Other B.A. M.A. P.H.D. 4 22 Professional Qualifications are defined by the State and may include information such as the degrees of public school teachers (e.g., percentage of teachers with Bachelors Degrees or Masters Degrees) or the percentage of fully certified teachers Teacher Quality - Class School Aggregate High-Poverty Schools Low-Poverty Schools age of Core Academic Subject Elementary and Secondary School Classes not Taught by Highly Qualified Teachers.%.%.% Teacher Quality - Provisional Certification age of Public Elementary and Secondary School Teachers in the School with Emergency Certification % A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 23 of 3

3/23/216 NAEP Grade 4 Math of below Basic Basic Advanced All 1 23 77 34 5 Male Female 51 49 22 23 78 77 36 32 6 4 National Lunch Program Eligibility Eligible Not Eligible Info not available 47 53 # 36 1 64 9 17 49 1 9 Race/Ethnicity White Black Hispanic Asian Indian/Alaska Native Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander Two or More Races 72 15 6 4 1 # 3 15 53 38 11 85 47 62 89 39 1 21 58 5 &#35 3 19 &#8225 Student classified as having a disability SD Not SD 12 88 47 19 53 81 14 37 1 5 Student is an English Language Learner ELL Not ELL 5 95 42 22 58 78 16 35 1 5 Reporting Standards not met. Note: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant. Detail may not sum to total because of rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education. Institute for Education Sciences. National Center for Education Statistics. National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) 215 Achievement. A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 24 of 3

3/23/216 NAEP Grade 8 Math of below Basic Basic Advanced All 1 32 39 22 7 Male Female 51 49 31 34 39 39 23 21 7 6 National Lunch Program Eligibility Eligible Not Eligible Info not available 45 55 # 48 19 39 4 12 3 2 11 Race/Ethnicity White Black Hispanic Asian Indian/Alaska Native Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander Two or More Races 69 2 4 3 1 # 2 23 66 38 11 43 29 44 18 26 5 15 39 7 # 4 32 Student classified as having a disability SD Not SD 11 89 77 27 19 41 3 24 # 7 Student is an English Language Learner ELL Not ELL 3 97 54 32 33 39 11 22 2 7 Reporting Standards not met. NOTE: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant. Detail may not sum to total because of rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education. Institute for Education Sciences. National Center for Education Statistics. National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) 215 Achievement. A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 25 of 3

3/23/216 NAEP Grade 12 Math of below Basic Basic Advanced All 1 34 41 23 2 Male Female 51 49 32 35 41 42 26 22 1 1 National Lunch Program Eligibility Eligible Not Eligible Info not available 35 64 54 22 37 44 9 32 2 Race/Ethnicity White Black Hispanic Asian Indian Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander Two or More Races 76 14 5 3 1 1 26 68 58 26 42 27 33 32 3 5 9 35 2 7 Student classified as having a disability SD Not SD 9 91 78 3 19 43 3 25 2 Student is an English Language Learner ELL Not ELL 2 98 33 41 24 2 Reporting Standards not met. NOTE: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant. Detail may not sum to total because of rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education. Institute for Education Sciences. National Center for Education Statistics. National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) 215 Achievement. A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 26 of 3

3/23/216 NAEP Grade 4 Reading of below Basic Basic Advanced All 1 37 63 29 5 Male Female 5 5 39 34 61 66 26 31 5 6 National Lunch Program Eligibility Eligible Not Eligible Info not available 48 52 # 5 24 5 76 16 4 1 8 Race/Ethnicity White Black Hispanic Asian Indian/Alaska Native Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander Two or More Races 72 14 6 4 1 # 3 32 66 49 16 3 68 34 51 84 7 32 9 17 49 37 6 1 1 15 8 Student classified as having a disability SD Not SD 12 88 76 32 24 68 7 31 # 6 Student is an English Language Learner ELL Not ELL 4 96 52 36 48 64 16 29 2 5 # Rounds to zero Reporting Standards not met. NOTE: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant. Detail may not sum to total because of rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 215 Reading Assessment. A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 27 of 3

3/23/216 NAEP Grade 8 Reading of below Basic Basic Advanced All 1 24 44 29 3 Male Female 51 49 29 2 45 42 25 34 2 4 National Lunch Program Eligibility Eligible Not Eligible Info not available 45 55 # 37 14 45 43 17 39 1 4 Race/Ethnicity White Black Hispanic Asian/Pacific Islander Indian/Alaska Native Two or More Races 69 2 4 3 1 2 18 47 27 13 44 44 41 35 34 9 29 41 3 &#35 3 1 Student classified as having a disability SD Not SD 1 9 64 2 3 45 5 32 # 3 Student is an English Language Learner ELL Not ELL 3 97 57 23 37 44 6 3 # 3 # Rounds to zero Reporting Standards not met. NOTE: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant. Detail may not sum to total because of rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 215 Reading Assessment. A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 28 of 3

3/23/216 NAEP Grade 12 Reading of below Basic Basic Advanced All 1 26 5 27 5 Male Female 5 5 31 2 37 37 28 37 4 6 National Lunch Program Eligibility Eligible Not Eligible Info not available 35 64 1 37 19 39 36 22 38 2 7 Race/Ethnicity White Black Hispanic Asian Indian Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander Two or More Races 76 14 5 3 1 2 52 34 21 38 36 44 26 36 12 21 41 6 1 12 Student classified as having a disability SD Not SD 7 93 66 23 25 38 8 34 1 5 Student is an English Language Learner ELL Not ELL 2 98 25 37 33 5 # Rounds to zero Reporting Standards not met. NOTE: Observed differences are not necessarily statistically significant. Detail may not sum to total because of rounding. SOURCE: U.S. Department of Education, Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics, National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), 215 Reading Assessment. A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 29 of 3

3/23/216 NAEP Participation Data Grade Subject Participation Rate for with Disabilities Standard Error Participation Rate for Limited English Standard Error 4 Math Reading 87 73 1.9 3.7 95 9 2. 2.5 8 Math Reading 84 76 3.6 3.3 84 83 5.2 4. A service of the Center for Educational Performance and Information (CEPI) Page 3 of 3