Understanding Clinical Papers Second Edition

Transcription

1 Understanding Clinical Papers Second Edition David Bowers School of Medicine, University of Leeds, UK Allan House School of Medicine, University of Leeds, UK David Owens School of Medicine, University of Leeds, UK

2

3 Understanding Clinical Papers Second Edition

4

5 Understanding Clinical Papers Second Edition David Bowers School of Medicine, University of Leeds, UK Allan House School of Medicine, University of Leeds, UK David Owens School of Medicine, University of Leeds, UK

6 Copyright ß 2006 John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex PO19 8SQ, England Telephone (+44) (for orders and customer service enquiries): Visit our Home Page on or All Rights Reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording, scanning or otherwise, except under the terms of the Copyright, Designs and Patents Act 1988 or under the terms of a licence issued by the Copyright Licensing Agency Ltd, 90 Tottenham Court Road, London W1T 4LP, UK, without the permission in writing of the Publisher. Requests to the Publisher should be addressed to the Permission Department, John Wiley & Sons Ltd, The Atrium, Southern Gate, Chichester, West Sussex PO19 8SQ, England, or ed to permreq@wiley.co.uk, or faxed to (þ44) Designations used by companies to distinguish their products are often claimed as trademarks. All brand names and product names used in this book are trade names, service marks, trademarks or registered trademarks of their respective owners. The Publisher is not associated with any product or vendor mentioned in this book. This publication is designed to provide accurate and authoritative information in regard to the subject matter covered. It is sold on the understanding that the Publisher is not engaged in rendering professional services. If professional advice or other expert assistance is required, the services of a competent professional should be sought. Other Wiley Editorial Offices John Wiley & Sons Inc., 111 River Street, Hoboken, NJ 07030, USA Jossey-Bass, 989 Market Street, San Francisco, CA , USA Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH, Boschstr. 12, D Weinheim, Germany John Wiley & Sons Australia Ltd, 42 McDougall Street, Milton, Queensland 4064, Australia John Wiley & Sons (Asia) Pte Ltd, 2 Clementi Loop #02-01, Jin Xing Distripark, Singapore John Wiley & Sons Canada Ltd, 22 Worcester Road, Etobicoke, Ontario, Canada M9W 1L1 Wiley also publishes its books in a variety of electronic formats. Some content that appears in print may not be available in electronic books. Library to Congress Cataloging-in-Publication DataAbid, Mohamed M. Bowers, David, Understanding clinical papers / David Bowers, Allan House, David Owens. 2nd ed. p. ; cm. Includes bibliographical references and index. ISBN (hardback : alk. paper) ISBN (pbk. : alk. paper) 1. Medical literature. 2. Medical writing. 3. Journalism, Medical. [DNLM: 1. Journalism, Medical. 2. Reading. 3. Writing. WZ 345 B786u 2006] I. House, Allan. II. Owens, David, Dr. III. Title. R118.6.B dc British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data A catalogue record for this book is available from the British Library ISBN ISBN Typeset in 10/12pt Times Roman by Thomson Press (India) Limited, New Delhi, India Printed and bound in Great Britain by Anthony Rowe, Ltd, Chippenham, Wiltshire This book is printed on acid-free paper responsibly manufactured from sustainable forestry in which at least two trees are planted for each one used for paper production.

7 Contents Preface to the First Edition Preface to the Second Edition Acknowledgements vii ix xi VIIPART I SETTING THE SCENE: WHO DID WHAT, AND WHY 1 Some Preliminaries 3 2 The Abstract and Introduction 7 3 The Objectives 15 VIPART II DESIGN MATTERS: WHAT TYPE OF STUDY ARE YOU READING ABOUT? 4 Descriptive Studies 21 5 Analytic Studies 27 6 Intervention Studies 35 VPART III THE CAST: FINDING OUT ABOUT THE SUBJECTS OF THE RESEARCH 7 The Research Setting 45 8 Populations and Samples 49 9 Identifying and Defining Cases Controls and Comparisons 57 IIPART IV ESTABLISHING THE FACTS: STARTING WITH BASIC OBSERVATIONS 11 Identifying the Characteristics of Data Summarizing the Characteristics of Data Measuring the Characteristics of Subjects Measuring the Characteristics of Measures Measurement Scales 93 VPART V ESTABLISHING MORE OF THE FACTS: SOME COMMON WAYS OF DESCRIBING RESULTS 16 Fractions, Proportions and Rates Risk and Odds Ratios of Risk and Odds 113 v

8 vi CONTENTS IIPART VI ANALYSING THE DATA: ESTIMATION AND HYPOTHESIS TESTING 19 Confidence Intervals for Means, Proportions, and Medians Confidence Intervals for Ratios Testing Hypotheses the p-value 135 IPART VII ANALYSING THE DATA: MULTIVARIABLE METHODS 22 Measuring Association Measuring Agreement The Linear Regression Model The Logistic Regression Model Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Measuring Survival 193 PART VIII READING BETWEEN THE LINES: HOW AUTHORS USE TEXT, TABLES AND PICTURES TO TELL YOU WHAT THEY VE DONE 28 Results in Text and Tables Results in Pictures The Discussion and the Conclusions 217 References 221 Index 227

9 Preface to the First Edition Buy this book if you are a healthcare professional and you want some guidance in understanding the clinical research literature. It is designed to help you with reading research papers, by explaining their structure and the vocabulary they use. These essential first steps will make interpretation of clinical research that much easier for you. For example, the book will help with questions like: Who were the authors, what is their standing, and can they be trusted? What question or questions did they want to answer, and what was the clinical importance of doing so? Who were the subjects in the study, how were they chosen, and were the methods used the most suitable? How were the data collected? Was this the best approach? What methods did the authors use to analyse the data, and were the methods employed appropriate? What did they find? Were their conclusions consistent with their results? Were there any shortcomings in the study? Do the authors acknowledge them? What are the clinical implications of their results? Does it all make sense? This book is not an introduction to medical statistics, study design, epidemiology, systematic reviews, evidence-based medicine, or critical appraisal, although we inevitably touch on all of these things (and more). Even so, if you are not already well versed in some of these fields, you should know a lot more by the time you get to the end. We have concentrated on improving our readers understanding of quantitative research papers; and while qualitative papers contain several important elements which we have not been able to cover here, there are many other areas, particularly at the beginning and end of papers, which readers of qualitative papers will find relevant to their needs. Primarily, this book should be of interest to the following individuals: Clinicians currently practising. This includes GPs, doctors in hospitals, in the community and in public health, nurses, midwives, health visitors, health educators and promoters, physiotherapists, dietitians, chiropodists, speech therapists, radiographers, pharmacists, and other clinically-related specialists. Clinicians of all types engaged in research activities: as part of their training; as a condition of their clinical duties; for postgraduate studies and courses; or for professional qualifications. Those involved with the education and training of health professionals in colleges of health, in universities, and in inhouse training and research departments. College, undergraduate, and postgraduate students in all medical and clinical disciplines which involve any element of research methods, medical statistics, epidemiology, critical appraisal, clinical effectiveness, evidence-based medicine, and the like. vii

10 viii PREFACE TO THE FIRST EDITION In addition, this book should appeal to individuals who, although not themselves clinicians, nonetheless find themselves in a clinical setting and need some understanding of what the published clinical research in their area means: Clinical auditors and quality sensors. Clinical managers. Service managers, administrators and planners. Those working in health authorities and in local government social and health departments. Purchasers of health provision. People not actually employed in a clinical arena but who nonetheless have a professional or personal interest in the medical literature for example, members of self-help and support groups; medical journalists; research-fund providers; the educated, interested, lay public. We have structured the contents of the book into a series of chapters or units whose sequence mirrors that of papers in most of the better-quality journals. Thus we start with the preliminaries (title, authors, institution, journal type and status, and so on) and end with the epilogue (discussion, conclusions and clinical implications). Throughout the book we have used a wide variety of extracts from recently published papers to illuminate our textual comments. In these we have focussed largely, but not solely, one example of good practice in the hope that this will provide readers with some how it should be done benchmarks. Any errors remain, of course, our own. David Bowers, Allan House, David Owens Leeds, 2001

11 Preface to the Second Edition We received a great many favourable comments from those who used the first edition of this book for which, many thanks. Why, then, a second edition? The reason is the usual one in these circumstances we think we can make the book even better. When we set out to write the first edition, we had a good idea of what we wanted to include, but inevitably there was some jostling for the available space. In the end, some things that we might have included had to be left on the cutting room floor. With this second edition we have now been able to include most of that excluded material. We have also taken the opportunity to respond to some helpful suggestions from readers. In addition to these changes, we have now added a considerable amount of completely new material. Thus, this second edition includes a new chapter on measurement scales, and new or significantly expanded sections on the following: ethical considerations; abstracts; consent to randomization into trials; pragmatic and explanatory trials; intention-to-treat analysis; elements of probability; data transformation; non-parametric tests; systematic review; among others. Moreover, there is a lot of new material in the chapters on regression including more on variable selection and model building, and on Cox regression. A good deal of the material in the middle chapters of the book has been re-arranged and improved to make for a better and more lucid flow (the treatment of dummy variables has been brought forward a chapter, for example). We have all taken the opportunity to update many of the extracts from clinical papers which we use to illustrate the various ideas and procedures we describe, and also to revise much of the text in the book to improve clarity and understanding. We remain more than willing to receive any constructive comments and suggestions from readers. Otherwise we are confident that this is now an even better book than the original. SOME NOTES ON STATISTICAL SOFTWARE There are several statistical packages, of varying levels of sophistication and complexity, which can be used to analyse clinical data. Among the most widely used are the following: CIA (Confidence Interval Analysis) EPI-Info Minitab SPSS (the Statistics Package for the Social Sciences) STATA S-PLUS In our opinion, Minitab is the simplest and friendliest statistics package for the general user. SPSS is not quite as easy to use but handles cross-tabulation of two variables rather better and has a wider range of the more sophisticated types of analyses. The choice of types of analysis and their outputs are perhaps easier to understand in Minitab than in SPSS. Each application has, of course, its limitations. To the best of our knowledge, Minitab does not do the McNemar test, nor does it have a clinically-based survival analysis program, nor does it allow for a direct calculation of Spearman s correlation coefficient (the ix

12 x PREFACE TO THE SECOND EDITION data need first to be ranked). On the other hand, SPSS does not allow a chi-squared test to be done directly on a contingency table in the columns of the data sheet, nor does it Provide confidence intervals for the difference between two proportions, or with the Mann-Whitney or Wilcoxon tests, all of which Minitab does. But as we have said, SPSS has a wider range of applications. CIA, as its name implies only does confidence interval calculations (but in this respect is very useful). EPI-Info is a combination database and epidemiological tool, which originates from the Center for Disease Control (CDC) in the USA. It has the advantage of being free (it can be downloaded from the Internet along with a user s manual). Most professional clinical statisticians will probably use either STATA or S-PLUS; both more powerful and versatile than either Minitab or SPSS (but rather less easy to use). We would not recommend Excel as a statistics program since it is fundamentally a spreadsheet tool and thus has an extremely limited range of statistical functions and in any case, these are not set out in a way that is well suited to clinical research. WRITING PAPERS FOR CLINICAL JOURNALS Those of you who envisage writing up your research and submitting paper to a clinical journal may find the following web site addresses (URLs) useful. They contain detailed advice and instructions to authors on what is required prior to submission: for example, how to contact the journal, what should be in the paper (order and content of sections), information on the required style, editorial policies and guidelines, and so on. The first URL directs you to a set of instructions to authors for each of over 3500 health and lifesciences journals, worldwide. The second and third URLs relate specifically to the British Medical Journal, but contain a huge amount of detailed and splendidly informative material related to the preparation and submission of clinical papers, and collectively provide a set of desirable standards to which anyone who is contemplating the submission of such a paper to the BMJ or any other journal should aspire: David Bowers, Allan House, David Owens, School of Medicine, University of Leeds, Autumn, 2005

13 Acknowledgements The authors and publisher wish to thank the copyright holders of the material quoted in the figures of this publication for giving their permission to reproduce the items listed below from those works, full details of which may be found in the references: Am J Epidemiology, de Boer et al. (1998), Figure 23.1 p. 160, Haelterman et al. (1997), Figure 24.3 p. 171, Jernström and Olssan (1997), Figure 22.5 p. 156, McKeown-Eyssen et al. (2000), Figure15.6 p. 102, Olson et al. (1997), Figure 22.4 p. 156, reproduced by permission of Oxford University Press. Arch Intern Med, Groenewoud et al. (2000), Figure 30.1 p. 218, Lien & Chan (1985), Figure 11.7 p. 72, reproduced by permission of the American Medical Association. Arch Pediatr Adol Med, Brent et al. (1995), Figure 6.1 p. 35, reproduced by permission of the American Medical Association. BMJ, Appleby et al. (1997), Figure 7.1 p. 46 and Figure 8.2 p. 51, Basso et al. (1997), Figure 17.3 p. 110, Beral et al. (1999), Figure 28.3 p. 204, Bhagwanjee et al. (1997), Figure 2.5 p. 12 and Figure 2.6 p.13, Blatchford et al. (1997), Figure 28.2 p. 203, Brandon et al. (1984), Figure 13.3 p. 84, Bruzzi et al. (1997), Figure 18.1 p. 114, Coste et al. (1994), Figure 12.4 p. 80, Cousens et al. (1997), Figure 7.3 p. 48, Dupuy et al. (1999), Figure 28.4 p. 205, Egger & Davey Smith (1998), Figure 26.3 p. 187, English et al. (1997), Figure 19.2 p. 124, Fahey et al. (1998), Figure 26.6 p. 191, Gaist et al. (2000), Figure 30.3 p. 220, Graham et al. (2000), Figure 2.2 p. 9, Grant et al. (2000), Figure 28.5 p. 206 and Figure 28.6 p. 207, Griffin (1998), Figure 26.5 p. 190, Grun et al. (1997), Figure 19.5 p. 128 and Figure 20.1 p. 131, He et al. (1994), Figure 23.2 p. 161, Judge & Benzeval (1993), Figure 20.2 p. 132, Kremer et al. (2000), Figure 28.7 p. 208, Kroman et al. (2002), Figure 29.7 p. 215, Levene (1992), Figure 4.4 p. 23, Little et al. (1997), Figure 21.2 p. 141, Macarthur et al. (1995), Figure 5.4 p. 32, Moore et al. (1998), Figure 26.4 p. 189, Murray et al. (1997), Figure 19.4 p. 126, Naumberg et al. (2000), Figure 13.4 p. 85, Oliver et al. (1997), Figure 14.2 p. 80, Pinnock et al. (2003), Figure 6.6 p. 41, Piscane et al. (1996), Figure 18.2 p. 115, Platt et al. (1997), Figure 8.1 p. 50, Poulter et al. (1999), Figure 2.3 p. 10, Premawardhena et al. (1999), Figure 6.2 p. 37 and Figure 6.4 p. 39, Reidy et al. (1998), Figure 28.1 p. 202, Salmon et al. (1998), Figure 5.2 p. 29, Singer & Freedman (1992), Figure 4.3 p. 22, Smith et al. (1995), Figure 11.5 p. 70, Tang et al. (1998). Figure 26.1 p. 184, Wald et al. (1997), Figure 17.4 p. 111, reproduced by permission of BMJ Publishing Group. Br J General Practice, Little (1998), Figure 22.3 p. 154, Rodgers & Miller (1997), Figure 11.6 p. 71, reproduced with permission of the Royal College of General Practitioners. Br J Psychiatry, Cooper et al. (1987), Figure 4.6 p. 25, Evans et al. (1999), Figure 3.3 p. 17, Figure 8.3 p. 52 and Figure 30.2 p. 219, Hawton et al. (1997), Figure 16.1 p. 108, reproduced by permission of the Royal College of Psychiatrists. Brain, Tebartz van Elst et al. (2000), Figure 3.2 p. 16, reproduced by permission of Oxford University Press. Clinical Chemistry, Van Steirteghem et al. (1982), Figure 14.1 p. 88, Reproduced by permission of AACC. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Gibbs et al. (2005), fig 26.2, p.185, reproduced by permission of the Cochrane Library. Geriatric Nursing, Culbertson et al. (2004), Figure 4.5 p. 24, Ellenbecker et al. (2004) Figure 4.7 p. 26, reproduced by permission of Elsevier Science. International Journal of Epidemiology, Grandjean et al. (2000), Figure 24.2 p. 168, reproduced by permission of Oxford University Press. J Advanced Nursing, Hagen et al. (2003), Figure 15.4 p.100, Figure 15.5 p. 101, and Figure 15.8 p.104, Hundley et al. (2000), Figure 10.3 p. 60, Kong (2005), Figure 2.1 p. 8, Lin et al. (2005), Figure 21.5 p. 144 and Figure 25.2 p. 179, Miles et al. (2002), Figure 15.1 p. 94 and Figure 15.7 p.103, reproduced by permission of Blackwell Science. xi

14 xii ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS J Am Med Assoc, Topol et al. (1997), Figure 11.3 p. 67 and Figure 21.3 p. 142, reproduced by permission of the American Medical Association. J Clinical Nursing, Ho & Lopez (2003), Figure 15.3 p. 96, Farnell et al. (2005), Figure 23.3, p.163, reproduced by permission of Blackwell Science. J Epidemiol Commun Health, Lindelow et al. (1997), Figure 14.3 p. 91, Peabody & Gertler (1997), Figure 11.4 p. 69, reproduced by permission. J Neurol Psychiatry, Carson et al. (2000), Figure 7.2 p. 47, reproduced by permission. Lancet, Adams et al. (1999), Figure 29.9 p. 216, Adish et al. (1999), Figure 9.2 p. 55, Chosidow et al. (1994), Figure 11.2 p. 67, Cooper et al. (1999), Figure 6.5 p. 40, Criqui & Ringel (1994), Figure 5.1 p. 28, Dunne et al. (1999), Figure 27.3 p. 196, Emerson et al. (1999), Figure 29.3 p. 212, Feeney et al. (1997), Figure 5.3 p. 31, Goldhaber et al. (1999), Figure 29.8 p. 216, Hancox et al. (2003), Figure 24.5 p. 175, Kwakkel et al. (1999), Figure 29.1 p. 210, Lacy et al. (2002), Figure 21.6 p. 145 and Figure 27.4 p.198, Ledergerber et al. (1999), Figure 29.6 p. 214, Mansi et al. (1999), Figure 27.2 p. 195, Marshall et al. (1995), Figure 13.1 p. 81 and Figure 13.2 p. 82, MERIT-HF Study Group (1999), Figure 29.2 p. 211, Möttönen et al. (1999), Figure 29.5 p. 213, Nikolajsen et al. (1998), Figure 12.2 p. 78 and Figure 19.3 p. 125, Singh & Crockard (1999), Figure 29.4 p. 212, Søyseth et al. (1995), Figure 12.3 p. 79 and Figure 21.4 p. 143, Taylor et al. (1999), Figure 18.3 p. 118, Thompson et al. (2000), Figure 2.4 p. 11 and Figure 3.1 p. 15, Turnbull et al. (1996), Figure 21.7 p. 147, Unwin et al. (1999), Figure 10.2 p. 59, all copyright The Lancet Ltd, reproduced by permission of Elsevier Science. Nature Medicine, Long et al. (2000), Figure 1.1 p. 3 and Figure 1.3 p. 6, reproduced by permission. Neurology, Rogers et al. (1998), Figure 9.1 p. 54 and Figure 13.5 p. 86, copyright 1998, reproduced by permission of Lippincott, Williams & Wilkins (a Wolters Kluwer Company). New Engl J Medicine, Michelson et al. (1996), Figure 19.1 p. 123 and Figure 21.1 p. 194, Pollack et al. (2002), Figure 27.1 p Copyright Massachusetts Medical Society. All rights reserved. Reproduced by permission. Pediatrics, Nead et al. (2004), Figure 25.3 p. 180, Phipatanakul et al. (2004), Figure 25.1 p. 178, reproduced by permission of the American Association of Pediatricians. Quality in Health Care, Hearn & Higinson (1999), Figure 15.2 p. 95, McKee & Hunter (1995), Figure 22.2 p. 153, reproduced by permission. Stroke, Henderson et al. (2000), Figure 1.2 p. 4, reproduced by permission. Venereology, Ho Han et al. (1999), Figure 10.1 p. 57, reproduced by permission.

15 PART I Setting the Scene: Who Did What, and Why