Lexicalizing number and gender in Lunigiana
|
|
- Madlyn Dickerson
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 Lexicalizing nuber and gender in Lunigiana Knut Tarald Taraldsen CASTL, University o Trosø Abstract In this article, I present an analysis o gender and nuber arking on nouns in a group o Italian dialects. These dialects share the property that the ural orphee is in both the einine and the asculine gender in both declension classes. But there is an asyetry: in contexts where urality is arked on a deteriner, the ural arking does not appear on nouns or adjectives in the einine gender, but does appear on asculine nouns and adjectives. I argue that this asyetry can be understood once it is recognized that a vocabulary ite can lexicalize ore than a single terinal, and that lexicalization is governed by the Superset Princie, i.e. i the lexicon associates a vocabulary ite with a eature set F, it can lexicalize any constituent with the eature set F provided F is a superset o F. 1. Introduction Current late insertion accounts o the relationship between syntactic structure and vocabulary ites (orphees) tend to share the two assuptions in (1) and (2): (1) Vocabulary insertion targets only terinal nodes. (2) The Subset Princie A vocabulary ite A associated with the eature set F can reace a terinal X with the eature set F i and only i F is a subset o F. However, a growing body o conceptual and epirical considerations suggests that (1) and (2) should be reaced with (3) and (4), as argued extensively by M. Starke (CASTL research seinars); c. Abels and Muriungi (2008), Caha (2007), Caha (2009), Muriungi (2008), Taraldsen (to appear) as well as McCawley (1968), eelean and Szendröi (2007) and Weeran and Evers-Vereul (2002): (3) Vocabulary insertion targets subtrees (4) The Superset Princie I a grateul to Rita Manzini or useul observations and to Lucie Medová or oratting the paper. c 2009 Knut Tarald Taraldsen. ordlyd 36.2, special issue on anosyntax, ed. Peter Svenonius, Gillian Rachand, Michal Starke, and Knut Tarald Taraldsen, pp CASTL, Trosø.
2 Lexicalizing nuber and gender in Lunigiana A vocabulary ite A associated with the eature set F can reace a subtree X with the eature set F i and only i F is a superset o F. The eature set o a subtree will be the set o eatures associated with its terinal nodes. 1 The purpose o this reark is to provide an additional epirical arguent or oving ro (1) (2) to (3) (4). 2. Feinine ural arking in Lunigiana Manzini and Savoia (2005:III, 618) report that various Italian dialects in the Lunigiana area never use the standard Italian -e as a arker o.. Instead, one inds -ja on deteriners, nouns and adjectives which would have -a in the.sg, e.g. δona woan vs δonja woen in the Colonnata variety. Like Manzini & Savoia, I think the null hypothesis should be that -ja is decoposable as + -a, where -a is the usual einine gender arker also ound in the singular ors, 2 while is the ural aix also ound in the ural o asculine nouns, both in Lunigianese, e.g. kwanti oi how any en (Filattiera), and in Standard Italian. So, both on the standard approach and on ine, lexical insertion will target two syntactic nodes separately: (5) -a I take it that the coniguration in (5) is created by successive oveent o the to the speciier o the head through the speciier o, as shown in (8)): 1 I eatures are privative and associated one-to-one with syntactic heads ordered by a ixed hierarchy, a lexical entry will siy associate a vocabulary ite with a syntactic structure Σ, and (4) is equivalent with (i): (i) The Superset Princie A vocabulary ite A associated with the structure Σ can reace a tree X i and only i X is a subtree o Σ. 2 Harris (1991) argues that noinal endings like -a, which he calls class arkers, relect gender only indirectly. This is largely based on the observation that there are nouns in -a, e.g. artista artist and pirata pirate, which trigger asculine agreeent on deteriners and adjectives, there is a einine noun ano hand in -o (otherwise liited to asculine ors), and the e-class contains both asculine and einine nouns and adjectives. I could adopt Harris s conclusion here without any consequences or the analysis. The eatures and that appear throughout should then be thought o as whatever eatures one ight use to characterize the dierent class arkers. However, y analysis o the e-class in section 8 sees to reove the otivation this class ight provide or distinguishing class-arkers ro gender-heads, there is only one noun like ano, and the peculiarity o artista etc. is liited to the singular. Thus, I reain relatively unconvinced by Harris s arguents, and treat -a etc. as gender-heads. 114
3 Knut Tarald Taraldsen (6) That is, I assue that the heads and appear in their underlying order. One reason or assuing this is that it sees natural to assue that the gender arker, being directly selected by the, should be below uber (). I also assue that traces are ignored when the lexicalization procedure parses a syntactic structure. 3 Then, [ [ ]] is a subtree in (6), and it could be targeted by vocabulary insertion o -e with the lexical entry in (7a): (7) a. -e {,} -e This would produce the Standard Italian. ors. Lunigianese, however, doesn t have the Standard Italian -e. So, instead, and are lexicalized separately, as would, o course, be entirely possible also on standard accounts. otice that i traces are ignored by the lexicalization process, and will end up oring a constituent or the purposes o lexicalization even i has a coeent stranded by -oveent in (6). In act, Cinque s successul (2005) account o Greenberg s Universal 20 in ters o Poveent iies that the coeents o are evacuated ro a P beore the P starts raising across adjectives, nuerals or deonstratives, and the positions the coeents o are evacuated to ust obviously be above the position has raised to in (6). 3. Masculine ural arking in Lunigiana The ural ors o asculine nouns have a single aix in Lunigianese, e.g. kwanti oi how any en, instead o the two aixes seen in the einine ural. That is, there is no separate aix coparable to the -a o the einine paradig spelling out the gender arker. Yet, on the assuption that all nouns conor to the sae structural teate, one would expect that the position lexicalized by -a in the einine ors should be present in the structure o the asculine ors as well. 3 Any theory has to have a way o encoding the act that the in (6) is going to be lexicalized in its derived position rather than in the position o the trace (or copy). Saying that traces are ignored when the lexicalization procedure parses the input tree, aounts to saying that this procedure only sees syntactic eleents in the positions where they are lexicalized. 115
4 Lexicalizing nuber and gender in Lunigiana I (3) is valid, one can in act analyze a asculine ural like oi en as in (8b), positing the lexical entry in (8a): (8) a. {,} o That is, the surace discrepancy between einine urals and asculine urals would not be attributed to an underlying structural dierence, but rather to the irreducibly idiosyncratic properties o VIs (vocabulary ites). The act that associated with the eature set {, } also lexicalizes just in the einine ors, would ollow ro the Superset Princie, but is inconsistent with the Subset Princie. There are two other analytical options, both copatible with (1) (2): One could assue that the two heads hosting and -a in the einine urals use into one in the asculine paradig, or assue that the gender arker is Ø in the asculine paradigs. 4 Taking the irst o these two options one will have to block usion in the einine paradig, since the einine urals would otherwise also surace with just or just -a rather than a. 5 Thus, there will be two dierent coponents o the graar in which unpredictable properties are stipulated, the lexicon and a orphological coponent coprising usion. This appears to be an unwarranted weakening o the theory in view o the act that the alternative analysis in (8) successully relegates unpredictability to the lexicon alone. As or the second option consistent with (1) (2), there is no general arguent against null orphees as such, and, as we will see in the next section, the or o singular asculine nouns and adjectives in Lunigianese sees einently copatible with the hypothesis that the asculine gender arker is lexicalized by Ø in these varieties. 4. Masculine singular nouns in Lunigiana Most asculine nouns do not have an exponent o gender in the singular, i.e. no -o coparable to the Standard Italian.sg. -o: (9) a. o an a an radel brother a brother (Lunigianese) 4 I agree with Rachand (2008) and Fábregas (2007) that every node ust be lexicalized, but this ust still allow lexicalization by Ø. 5 Taking a as a single orphee would see to beg the question why this orphee looks exactly like the concatenation o an independently existing ural arker and a gender arker. 116
5 Knut Tarald Taraldsen As or those ew that do, I assue that the inal vocalic eleent is epenthetic, ollowing R. Manzini (p.c.). This is obviously consistent with saying that the gender arker is lexicalized by -Øon asculine nouns and adjectives, i.e. -Ø {}. But (3) (4) also allows one to assue that the asculine gender is lexicalized by the root along with, e.g. /o/ = [ [ ]], in the singular (assuing also privative, although that is not critical): 6 (10) o In the asculine ural ors (produced by -oveent without piedpiping), however, and do not or a subtree: (11) Thereore, no root can lexicalize and together in the ural ors. But can lexicalize together with i it has the entry in (8a) (repeated below): (12) a. {,} o As already pointed out in section 2, the Superset Princie akes this ully consistent with the hypothesis that lexicalizes just in. ors. Since the Superset Princie would also allow to lexicalize just in the asculine singular, as in (14), we also need to say why the.sg is in act not oi, but o: (13) o When a VI with the eature set F reaces a subtree T whose eature set is a proper subset o F, a nuber o the eatures in F ails to ind a atch in T. This is exicitly allowed by the Superset Princie, but we ay still assue that the lexicalization procedure seeks to iniize the nuber o unatched eatures when aced with a choice between two copeting lexicalization patterns. I so, the pattern in (10), in which no 6 otice that this rests on the assuption that lexical VIs are introduced exactly the sae way as unctional VIs. In particular, they are not conined to special root phrases, but reace phrases built up ro syntactic heads at the end o the syntactic coputation. 117
6 Lexicalizing nuber and gender in Lunigiana eature associated with o is unatched, is preerred over (14), in which both the eature associated with o and the eature associated with ail to be atched in the substructures targeted by lexicalization. 7 At this point, then, two analytical options reain alive or the.sg ors o Lunigianese. The gender arker ay either be lexicalized by the noinal root or by a null orphee Ø. But I will show that denying that the gender arker is Ø in asculine nouns in Lunigianese leads directly to an exanatory account o the acts we will exaine in the next section, whereas the copeting analysis doesn t. 5. Silent in Colonnata In the Colonnata dialect o Lunigianese, the ural on the einine noun sees to be in coeentary distribution with the ural arking on deteriners and quantiiers, i.e. when the noun cooccurs with an article or quantiier arked with (relected only in the palatalization o the l- o the article in (14a)), only the gender arker -a appears on the noun: (14) a. λa the.. the woen tantja so.any.. δona woan. so any woen δona woan. Otherwise, the noun has the ull. inlection a, e.g. tre d donja three woen. I take this to be an ellipsis phenoenon in the speciic sense that whenever the eleent lexicalizing is spelled out on a deteriner or a quantiier, it is not also pronounced on the noun or an attributive adjective. Siilarly, is not pronounced on a past particie agreeing with a. object clitic, as in (16a). But ro this perspective, it is surprising that is in act always spelled out on a. or (with the exceptions discussed in section 6): (15) kwanti oi how.any. an. how any en (16) a. a λ o caata S O.. have.1.sg called. I have called the einine. (Filattiera) 7 In act, Miniize unatched eatures can be shown to underlie the various blocking eects discussed in Caha (2009) and Taraldsen (to appear). 118
7 Knut Tarald Taraldsen a j o caati S O.. have.1.sg called. I have called the asculine. (Colonnata) In particular, this is surprising i is just speciied as {}, as it would have to be on an analysis o. a adhering to (2). But on an account assuing (4), the Superset Princie, rather than (2), we can assign the lexical entry in (8a), as the einine vs. asculine asyetry discussed in section 2 requires, i the asculine gender arker is not lexicalized by Ø in Lunigianese. This allows us to take advantage o the act that even with einine nouns the gender arker is always spelled out. The ollowing sections will show how this works. 6. Why ellipsis preserves the in the. Suppose now the structure in (15) is ebedded under a deteriner with its own arking. On the basis o (8), we now expect the head in (15) not to be pronounced. Yet, as (15) shows, the noun will have a inal. We know ro (14) that although the exponent o is not pronounced in the presence o an inlected deteriner, the gender arker (-a) is. The hypothesis that lexicalizes both and the asculine gender arker, i.e. {, }, enables us to use this act to exain why asculine ural nouns and adjectives retain even in the contexts where the einine ors lose it. Since ellipsis never aects the gender arker, suppose that -ellipsis relects the existence o a lexical entry Ø {} associated with a recoverability condition. Then, elliptical einine urals arise ro the lexicalization pattern in (17): (17) δon Ø -a That is, there will be no ural, because the only piece o structure that could be lexicalized by it is silent. otice that whenever the recoverability condition is et, Ø will always be preerred over or the lexicalization o in the einine or, since Ø is a perect it or, while has one eature () not atched by the target. But when the head is lexicalized in a asculine or, a syste iniizing unatched eatures will select the lexicalization pattern depicted in (18), assuing, as beore, that has the lexical entry in (8a) ( {, }): 119
8 Lexicalizing nuber and gender in Lunigiana (18) o Thus, we have the result that the o the. ors is retained under ellipsis or exactly the sae reason as the gender-arking -a o the. ors: Ø doesn t lexicalize the gender arker. 7. The case or (3) (4) at this point To assess the iport o the Lunigiana acts, it is necessary to begin by considering how analyses consistent with (1) (2) would account or the sae acts. Fro section 3, we know that an analysis respecting (1) should assue that the asculine gender eature is lexicalized by Ø in Lunigiana in order to aintain orphosyntactic parallelis between the einine urals in a and the asculine urals in. In section 4, we saw that the shape o asculine singular nouns is copatible with that assuption. But in section 5, we noticed that although the ural arker disappears ro the einine ors in certain contexts, it reains in the asculine ors in the sae environents. I the asculine ural ors are parsed as in (19b), aintaining total parallelis with the einine ors exeiied in (19a), an ellipsis rule targeting the eature should ake the disappear in the asculine ors as well: (19) a. δon -a o Ø Accordingly, upholding (1) coes at a price. Rather than orulate the ellipsis rule in the siest or copatible with the einine paradig, we ust add that is only deleted when preceding. But the analysis is unable to tie this up with any other property distinguishing asculine ro einine nouns. Abandoning (1) in avor o (3), however, we can deny that the gender arker is ever lexicalized by Ø in Lunigiana, taking to lexicalize the constituent [ [ ]] in asculine ural ors like oi. Correspondingly, the Superset Princie predicts that will appear in asculine ural ors (as a lexicalization o ) in the contexts where it disappears in the einine ors even i we aintain the siest possible stateent o the ellipsis rule. The contrast between the asculine ural and the einine in ellipsis environents siy derived ro the lexical entry or. So, the case or (3) (4) is not ade by showing that no theory consistent with (1) (2) can provide a descriptively accurate account o the Lunigiana acts considered in the preceding sections. What we have seen is rather that 120
9 Knut Tarald Taraldsen a descriptively accurate analysis consistent with (1) (2) requires a brute orce stipulation to handle the einine asculine contrast in the ural ors. A theory based on (3) (4) delivers a uch ore elegant analysis o the sae acts, relegating idiosyncracies to the one coponent where idiosyncracies cannot be avoided, i.e. the lexicon. This is a perectly valid line o arguent in y opinion, and one that has been proitably pursued in the developent o linguistic theory. And soe Lunigiana acts that reain to be discussed will strengthen y case. 8. Another declension class Manzini & Savoia s description indicates that even soe. ors ay in act lose the in Lunigianese dialects. But the only exaes given are the adjective zoven young (Standard Italian giovani) in Filattiera and the noun can dogs (Standard Italian cani) ro Bedizzano. R. Manzini (p.c.) adds brev short (Standard Italian breve). These contrast with. adjectives like bravi good, clever, belli beautiul and nouns like oi en in the sae contexts. I the exaes are representative, we have a contrast between declension classes. Adjectives like zoven and nouns like can all into the class o asculine nouns and adjectives whose sg ors end in -e rather than -o in Standard Italian. In Lunigiana, they apparently have no inal vowel in the singular. As a irst step towards an analysis, I adopt the view that the -e appearing in the singular ors o nouns and adjectives in the Standard Italian e-class is epenthetic. This leads to the urther conclusion that the gender arker ust be lexicalized by the root in the -e class o Standard Italian. Feinine nouns in this declension class lexicalize the einine gender arker, and asculine nouns lexicalize the asculine gender arker, along with the other eatures lexicalized by any noinal root. To extend this to adjectives, we ust represent one o the two genders as an aggregate o two privative eatures. Taking the einine as the arked gender, I decopose it into {,}. 8 An e-class adjective like breve short ust then have the entry breve {A,, }, and the Superset Princie will allow it to lexicalize the gender 8 When the einine is decoposed as {, }, and, correspondingly, the.sg gender arker is assigned the entry -a {, }, -a becoes a candidate or lexicalizing the gender arker in an elliptical asculine ural, as in (i): (i) o Ø -a But since one o the eatures associated with -a is unatched in its target in (i), this option is blocked in avor o (18). 121
10 Lexicalizing nuber and gender in Lunigiana arker both in the einine and the asculine ors. This orced ove will be seen to have another benign consequence later on. On this view, the derivation o a Standard Italian asculine singular like cane proceeds in the two steps shown in (20): (20) a. can (lexicalization) can cane (epenthesis) This accounts or the act that the einine and the asculine ors have the sae singular ending in the e-class. We ight also capture this by saying that the gender arker is lexicalized by Ø in both genders in the e-class. However, the einine and the asculine ors also syncretize in the ural in this class. Both the einine noce nut and the asculine cane or their urals with : noci, cani. Positing zero alloorphs or the gender arker turns out not to yield an account o this. The act that the einine nouns in the e-class or their urals with is unexpected i the structure underlying these ors are exactly like those otivated on the basis o the Lunigianese. a in section 2, i.e. [ [ [ / ]]]. To see this, consider irst what we need to say to ake the ural o donna coe out as donne rather than donnia in Standard Italian. Assuing the einine ural arker -e in Standard Italian donne woen to coe ro the entry -e {,, }, both lexicalization patterns in (21) are a priori possible: (21) a. donn -e donn -a To block (21b), we need to assue that the entry or is {, }. Then, a lexicalization procedure seeking to iniize unatched eatures in the VIs will preer (21a) over (21b), since the gender eature associated with ails to ind a atch in its target in (21b), while no eature o -e is unatched in (21a). In this light, consider the options in (22), with a einine e-class noun, assuing Ø {, }: (22) a. noc -e noc Ø Given {, }, (22a) will be preerred over (22b) or exactly the sae reason (21a) is preerred over (21b), incorrectly predicting that the 122
11 Knut Tarald Taraldsen ural or o noce should be noce rather than noci. Thereore, I suggest that the urals o e-class nouns in Standard Italian have a dierent structure ro the urals in the o/i-class and the a/e-class, which will continue to be the one arrived at in section (2), i.e. [ [ [ [ ]]]]. More precisely, I propose that the oveent o across at the second step o the derivation pied-pipes the gender arker in the e-class, leading to the roll-up derivation in (23) (where traces are ignored): (23) The derivation or nouns in other classes will not involve pied-piping: (24) Treating the e-class as special in exactly this way, we are iediately able not only to rule out urals in -e or the einine e-class nouns, but also to account or the asculine einine syncretis in the ural. otice irst that -e cannot lexicalize any o {,, } together in the rolled-up structure [[ ] ] ], since they do not or non-trivial constituents in this structure. That is, the assuption that lexicalization targets subtrees rules out the patterns in (25), aong others: (25) a. -e noc -e noc Thus, -e can lexicalize in einine e-class nouns only i it lexicalizes only the single head, as in (26): (26) noc -e 123
12 Lexicalizing nuber and gender in Lunigiana (28) shows two o the a priori possible lexicalization patterns copeting with (26), given the lexical entries in (27): (27) a. noc {,, } -a {, } c. -e {,, } d. {, } (28) a. noc noc -a The version (28b) is dispreerred relative to both (28a) and (26), since the root noce is associated with two eatures not atched in its target, while all eatures o noce are atched in (28a) and (26). Reacing -a with -e in (28b) or with -e wouldn t change this, and (28a) is thereore the only copetitor to (26). Coparing now (28a) to (26), we see that -e has two eatures not atching the target in (26) ( and ), while has only one (). Thereore, (26) in act blocks (28a), and we correctly predict that the ural or o noce is noci, relying on the decoposition o gender needed to accoodate the e-class adjectives. What we have seen, is that an analysis based on (3) (4) and assuing roll-up derivations or e-class nouns in Standard Italian accounts or the einine asculine syncretis in the ural without any appeal to contextsensitive alloorphy. Instead, we assue that nouns and adjectives in this class trigger pied-piping. Yet, within the space o analytical options copatible with (1) (2), there is one that achieves the sae desideratu: Delete in e-class nouns and adjectives. However, we will now see that there is one act which this alternative analysis can only handle at a cost, while the analysis assuing (3) (4) autoatically predicts it. 9. Back to Lunigiana Suppose we say that the Lunigiana varieties also have a separate class with the properties I have attributed to the Standard Italian e-class except there is no epenthetic -e. I an adjective like brev or a noun like can belongs to this class, the structure underlying its ural or will be the one created by the roll-up derivation, i.e. [[[[ ] ] ] ] or einine nouns/adjectives and [[[ ] ] ] or the asculine ones. This gives rise to the lexicalization patterns we have already seen or Standard Italian: 124
13 Knut Tarald Taraldsen (29) a. A can brev Since the root lexicalizes the gender arker both in the einine and the asculine ors, we have two correct predictions. The ural ending in the einine ors is rather than a, and in the contexts licensing -ellipsis, the disappears both in the einine and the asculine ors, giving /. brev and can, as desired, since atches all eatures o Ø (with the entry Ø {}), but leaves one eature o () unatched. The latter prediction cannot easily be reicated in an analysis consistent with (1) (2). As already noted, such an analysis could capture the einine asculine syncretis in the e-class urals by deleting the eature ro the gender arker. But in order to prevent the ural ro being targeted by -ellipsis in the asculine ors o the class corresponding to the Standard Italian o/i-class, e.g. oi en or belli beautiul, such an analysis needs to ake ellipsis apicable only in the context o a gender arker associated with. So the question now arises why -ellipsis is apicable at all with e-class nouns and adjectives. One could o course sidestep this proble by saying that what is deleted in the e-class is the whole gender arker, both in the einine and the asculine ors, and that -ellipsis apies except in the neighborhood o a gender arker bearing the eature. 9 But negative context speciications o this sort extend the power o distributional stateents in such a way that one can restrict the distribution o a or to a set o paradig cells not corresponding to a natural class. Consider, or exae, the ollowing distribution o the alloorphs A and B next to eleents o a category C subclassiied by two binary eatures X and Y: (30) +X -X +Y BC AC -Y AC AC The distribution o A in (30) cannot be given by a stateent deining its context as a natural class, e.g. A Z/ {C, +X}. But it can be stated as A Z except in {C, +X, +Y }. However, a distributional pattern like (30) can also be handled by blocking. One would posit A Z/ {C} and B Z/ {C, +X, +Y }, relying on soe version o the elsewhere princie to choose B over A next to a C speciied as {+X, +Y}. The act that an analysis consistent with (1) (2) needs a negative context speciication or -ellipsis in Lunigiana thereore eans that adopting such an analysis 9 Deleting just instead o would also account or the einine asculine syncretis in the e-class, and would predict -ellipsis in the asculine e-class ors with the asculine rather than the einine decoposed as {, }, but would require positing a special. alloorph or the e-class. 125
14 Lexicalizing nuber and gender in Lunigiana leads to a theory that have two dierent ways o handling paradigs like (30). But parsiony would dictate that there should only be one. The alternative analysis based on (3) (4), as developed over the preceding sections, is in act a blocking account o -ellipsis in the Lunigiana varieties. In the ellipsis contexts, appears instead o Ø just in case there is an extra eature () which can be lexicalized by, but not by Ø. 10. Suary I believe that the preceding sections have shown that adopting (3) (4) enables one to develop a coherent and relatively elegant account o the Lunigiana acts. Copeting accounts adhering to (1) (2), on the other, can achieve descriptive adequacy only by resorting to various ad hoc easures soe o which seriously reduce the appeal o the underlying general theory o the syntax lexicon connection. O course, I would view this conclusion lightly, i a theory based on (1) (2) were known to provide ore insightul analyses in other cases, or could be argued to be ore constrained. But I know o no case where an analysis copatible with (1) (2) has been shown to be superior to any analysis based on (3) (4). As or restrictiveness, I note that analyses oicially vindicating (1) (2) typically all back on orphological processes like usion to deal with acts that on the ace o it contradict the basic preise. This, o course, both underines any clai to restrictiveness and coicates the architecture o the syste by adding a orphological coponent which becoes totally redundant once (3) (4) are adopted. Reerences Abels, Klaus and Peter Muriungi The ocus particle in Kîîtharaka: Syntax and seantics. Lingua 118: Caha, Pavel Case Moveent in PPs. In ordlyd. Special issue on Space, Motion and Result, edited by Monika Bašić, Marina Pantcheva, Minjeong Son, and Peter Svenonius, vol. 32, pp Caha, Pavel The anosyntax o Case. Ph.D. thesis, CASTL Trosø. Cinque, Guglielo Deriving Greenberg s universal 20 and its exceptions. Linguistic Inquiry 36 3: Fábregas, Antonio An exhaustive lexicalization account o directional coeents. In ordlyd. Special issue on Space, Motion and Result, edited by Monika Bašić, Marina Pantcheva, Minjeong Son, and Peter Svenonius, vol. 32, pp Harris, Jaes W The exponence o gender in Spanish. Linguistic Inquiry 22 1: Manzini, Maria Rita and Leonardo M. Savoia I Dialetti Italiani e Roanci: orosintassi generativa. Edizioni dell Orso: Alessandria. 126
15 Knut Tarald Taraldsen McCawley, Jaes D Lexical insertion in a graar without deep structure. In Papers ro the ourth regional eeting o the Chicago Linguistic Society, edited by B. J. Darden, C.-J.. Bailey, and A. Davidson, pp University o Chicago, Chicago. Muriungi, Peter Phrasal oveent inside Bantu verbs. Ph.D. thesis, CASTL Trosø. eelean, Ad and Krista Szendröi Radical Pro Drop and the Morphology o Pronouns. Linguistic Inquiry 38 4: Rachand, Gillian Verb Meaning and the Lexicon: A First Phase Syntax. Cabridge University Press, ew York. Taraldsen, Knut Tarald. to appear. The nanosyntax o guni noun class preixes and concords. Lingua. Weeran, Fred and Jacqueline Evers-Vereul Pronouns and case. Lingua 112:
(3) Vocabulary insertion targets subtrees (4) The Superset Principle A vocabulary item A associated with the feature set F can replace a subtree X
Lexicalizing number and gender in Colonnata Knut Tarald Taraldsen Center for Advanced Study in Theoretical Linguistics University of Tromsø knut.taraldsen@uit.no 1. Introduction Current late insertion
More informationA Minimalist Approach to Code-Switching. In the field of linguistics, the topic of bilingualism is a broad one. There are many
Schmidt 1 Eric Schmidt Prof. Suzanne Flynn Linguistic Study of Bilingualism December 13, 2013 A Minimalist Approach to Code-Switching In the field of linguistics, the topic of bilingualism is a broad one.
More informationCitation for published version (APA): Veenstra, M. J. A. (1998). Formalizing the minimalist program Groningen: s.n.
University of Groningen Formalizing the minimalist program Veenstra, Mettina Jolanda Arnoldina IMPORTANT NOTE: You are advised to consult the publisher's version (publisher's PDF if you wish to cite from
More informationIntroduction to HPSG. Introduction. Historical Overview. The HPSG architecture. Signature. Linguistic Objects. Descriptions.
to as a linguistic theory to to a member of the family of linguistic frameworks that are called generative grammars a grammar which is formalized to a high degree and thus makes exact predictions about
More informationDecomposing Path. The Nanosyntax of Directional Expressions. Marina Blagoeva Pantcheva
Decomposing Path The Nanosyntax of Directional Expressions Marina Blagoeva Pantcheva A thesis submitted for the degree Philosophiae Doctor University of Tromsø Faculty of Humanities, Social Sciences and
More informationPhenomena of gender attraction in Polish *
Chiara Finocchiaro and Anna Cielicka Phenomena of gender attraction in Polish * 1. Introduction The selection and use of grammatical features - such as gender and number - in producing sentences involve
More informationApproaches to control phenomena handout Obligatory control and morphological case: Icelandic and Basque
Approaches to control phenomena handout 6 5.4 Obligatory control and morphological case: Icelandic and Basque Icelandinc quirky case (displaying properties of both structural and inherent case: lexically
More informationIn Udmurt (Uralic, Russia) possessors bear genitive case except in accusative DPs where they receive ablative case.
Sören E. Worbs The University of Leipzig Modul 04-046-2015 soeren.e.worbs@gmail.de November 22, 2016 Case stacking below the surface: On the possessor case alternation in Udmurt (Assmann et al. 2014) 1
More informationCase government vs Case agreement: modelling Modern Greek case attraction phenomena in LFG
Case government vs Case agreement: modelling Modern Greek case attraction phenomena in LFG Dr. Kakia Chatsiou, University of Essex achats at essex.ac.uk Explorations in Syntactic Government and Subcategorisation,
More informationConstraining X-Bar: Theta Theory
Constraining X-Bar: Theta Theory Carnie, 2013, chapter 8 Kofi K. Saah 1 Learning objectives Distinguish between thematic relation and theta role. Identify the thematic relations agent, theme, goal, source,
More informationProof Theory for Syntacticians
Department of Linguistics Ohio State University Syntax 2 (Linguistics 602.02) January 5, 2012 Logics for Linguistics Many different kinds of logic are directly applicable to formalizing theories in syntax
More informationSPEAKER IDENTIFICATION FROM SHOUTED SPEECH: ANALYSIS AND COMPENSATION
SPEAKER IDENTIFICATION FROM SHOUTED SPEECH: ANALYSIS AND COMPENSATION Ceal Hanilçi 1,2, Toi Kinnunen 2, Rahi Saeidi 3, Jouni Pohjalainen 4, Paavo Alku 4, Figen Ertaş 1 1 Departent of Electronic Engineering
More informationUnderlying and Surface Grammatical Relations in Greek consider
0 Underlying and Surface Grammatical Relations in Greek consider Sentences Brian D. Joseph The Ohio State University Abbreviated Title Grammatical Relations in Greek consider Sentences Brian D. Joseph
More informationLING 329 : MORPHOLOGY
LING 329 : MORPHOLOGY TTh 10:30 11:50 AM, Physics 121 Course Syllabus Spring 2013 Matt Pearson Office: Vollum 313 Email: pearsonm@reed.edu Phone: 7618 (off campus: 503-517-7618) Office hrs: Mon 1:30 2:30,
More informationMinimalism is the name of the predominant approach in generative linguistics today. It was first
Minimalism Minimalism is the name of the predominant approach in generative linguistics today. It was first introduced by Chomsky in his work The Minimalist Program (1995) and has seen several developments
More informationTutorial on Paradigms
Jochen Trommer jtrommer@uni-leipzig.de University of Leipzig Institute of Linguistics Workshop on the Division of Labor between Phonology & Morphology January 16, 2009 Textbook Paradigms sg pl Nom dominus
More informationFrequency and pragmatically unmarked word order *
Frequency and pragmatically unmarked word order * Matthew S. Dryer SUNY at Buffalo 1. Introduction Discussions of word order in languages with flexible word order in which different word orders are grammatical
More informationIntra-talker Variation: Audience Design Factors Affecting Lexical Selections
Tyler Perrachione LING 451-0 Proseminar in Sound Structure Prof. A. Bradlow 17 March 2006 Intra-talker Variation: Audience Design Factors Affecting Lexical Selections Abstract Although the acoustic and
More informationGrammars & Parsing, Part 1:
Grammars & Parsing, Part 1: Rules, representations, and transformations- oh my! Sentence VP The teacher Verb gave the lecture 2015-02-12 CS 562/662: Natural Language Processing Game plan for today: Review
More informationWord Stress and Intonation: Introduction
Word Stress and Intonation: Introduction WORD STRESS One or more syllables of a polysyllabic word have greater prominence than the others. Such syllables are said to be accented or stressed. Word stress
More informationAn Interactive Intelligent Language Tutor Over The Internet
An Interactive Intelligent Language Tutor Over The Internet Trude Heift Linguistics Department and Language Learning Centre Simon Fraser University, B.C. Canada V5A1S6 E-mail: heift@sfu.ca Abstract: This
More informationInformatics 2A: Language Complexity and the. Inf2A: Chomsky Hierarchy
Informatics 2A: Language Complexity and the Chomsky Hierarchy September 28, 2010 Starter 1 Is there a finite state machine that recognises all those strings s from the alphabet {a, b} where the difference
More informationInleiding Taalkunde. Docent: Paola Monachesi. Blok 4, 2001/ Syntax 2. 2 Phrases and constituent structure 2. 3 A minigrammar of Italian 3
Inleiding Taalkunde Docent: Paola Monachesi Blok 4, 2001/2002 Contents 1 Syntax 2 2 Phrases and constituent structure 2 3 A minigrammar of Italian 3 4 Trees 3 5 Developing an Italian lexicon 4 6 S(emantic)-selection
More informationWriting a composition
A good composition has three elements: Writing a composition an introduction: A topic sentence which contains the main idea of the paragraph. a body : Supporting sentences that develop the main idea. a
More informationCh VI- SENTENCE PATTERNS.
Ch VI- SENTENCE PATTERNS faizrisd@gmail.com www.pakfaizal.com It is a common fact that in the making of well-formed sentences we badly need several syntactic devices used to link together words by means
More informationThe Strong Minimalist Thesis and Bounded Optimality
The Strong Minimalist Thesis and Bounded Optimality DRAFT-IN-PROGRESS; SEND COMMENTS TO RICKL@UMICH.EDU Richard L. Lewis Department of Psychology University of Michigan 27 March 2010 1 Purpose of this
More information1/20 idea. We ll spend an extra hour on 1/21. based on assigned readings. so you ll be ready to discuss them in class
If we cancel class 1/20 idea We ll spend an extra hour on 1/21 I ll give you a brief writing problem for 1/21 based on assigned readings Jot down your thoughts based on your reading so you ll be ready
More informationKnowledge Discovery from E-Learning Activities
Knowledge Discover fro E-Learning Activities Addisson Salazar, Luis Vergara Universidad Politécnica de Valencia, Instituto de Telecounicaciones Aplicaciones Multiedia Caino de Vera s/n, 46022, Valencia,
More informationUCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations
UCLA UCLA Electronic Theses and Dissertations Title Head Movement in Narrow Syntax Permalink https://escholarship.org/uc/item/3fg4273b Author O'Flynn, Kathleen Chase Publication Date 2016-01-01 Peer reviewed
More informationImproved Effects of Word-Retrieval Treatments Subsequent to Addition of the Orthographic Form
Orthographic Form 1 Improved Effects of Word-Retrieval Treatments Subsequent to Addition of the Orthographic Form The development and testing of word-retrieval treatments for aphasia has generally focused
More informationParsing of part-of-speech tagged Assamese Texts
IJCSI International Journal of Computer Science Issues, Vol. 6, No. 1, 2009 ISSN (Online): 1694-0784 ISSN (Print): 1694-0814 28 Parsing of part-of-speech tagged Assamese Texts Mirzanur Rahman 1, Sufal
More informationProgram in Linguistics. Academic Year Assessment Report
Office of the Provost and Vice President for Academic Affairs Program in Linguistics Academic Year 2014-15 Assessment Report All areas shaded in gray are to be completed by the department/program. ISSION
More informationAn Introduction to the Minimalist Program
An Introduction to the Minimalist Program Luke Smith University of Arizona Summer 2016 Some findings of traditional syntax Human languages vary greatly, but digging deeper, they all have distinct commonalities:
More information1 st Quarter (September, October, November) August/September Strand Topic Standard Notes Reading for Literature
1 st Grade Curriculum Map Common Core Standards Language Arts 2013 2014 1 st Quarter (September, October, November) August/September Strand Topic Standard Notes Reading for Literature Key Ideas and Details
More informationENGBG1 ENGBL1 Campus Linguistics. Meeting 2. Chapter 7 (Morphology) and chapter 9 (Syntax) Pia Sundqvist
Meeting 2 Chapter 7 (Morphology) and chapter 9 (Syntax) Today s agenda Repetition of meeting 1 Mini-lecture on morphology Seminar on chapter 7, worksheet Mini-lecture on syntax Seminar on chapter 9, worksheet
More informationNotes on The Sciences of the Artificial Adapted from a shorter document written for course (Deciding What to Design) 1
Notes on The Sciences of the Artificial Adapted from a shorter document written for course 17-652 (Deciding What to Design) 1 Ali Almossawi December 29, 2005 1 Introduction The Sciences of the Artificial
More informationObjectives. Chapter 2: The Representation of Knowledge. Expert Systems: Principles and Programming, Fourth Edition
Chapter 2: The Representation of Knowledge Expert Systems: Principles and Programming, Fourth Edition Objectives Introduce the study of logic Learn the difference between formal logic and informal logic
More informationProgram Matrix - Reading English 6-12 (DOE Code 398) University of Florida. Reading
Program Requirements Competency 1: Foundations of Instruction 60 In-service Hours Teachers will develop substantive understanding of six components of reading as a process: comprehension, oral language,
More informationCS 598 Natural Language Processing
CS 598 Natural Language Processing Natural language is everywhere Natural language is everywhere Natural language is everywhere Natural language is everywhere!"#$%&'&()*+,-./012 34*5665756638/9:;< =>?@ABCDEFGHIJ5KL@
More informationhave to be modeled) or isolated words. Output of the system is a grapheme-tophoneme conversion system which takes as its input the spelling of words,
A Language-Independent, Data-Oriented Architecture for Grapheme-to-Phoneme Conversion Walter Daelemans and Antal van den Bosch Proceedings ESCA-IEEE speech synthesis conference, New York, September 1994
More informationSyntactic types of Russian expressive suffixes
Proc. 3rd Northwest Linguistics Conference, Victoria BC CDA, Feb. 17-19, 007 71 Syntactic types of Russian expressive suffixes Olga Steriopolo University of British Columbia olgasteriopolo@hotmail.com
More informationWords come in categories
Nouns Words come in categories D: A grammatical category is a class of expressions which share a common set of grammatical properties (a.k.a. word class or part of speech). Words come in categories Open
More informationSom and Optimality Theory
Som and Optimality Theory This article argues that the difference between English and Norwegian with respect to the presence of a complementizer in embedded subject questions is attributable to a larger
More informationE n v i r o n m e n t a l E d u c a t i o n
IUCN Pakistan Prograe Northern Areas Strategy for Sustainable Developent Background Paper E n v i r o n e n t a l E d u c a t i o n Ghula Abbas Planning & Developent Dept., Northern Areas E n v i r o
More informationBULATS A2 WORDLIST 2
BULATS A2 WORDLIST 2 INTRODUCTION TO THE BULATS A2 WORDLIST 2 The BULATS A2 WORDLIST 21 is a list of approximately 750 words to help candidates aiming at an A2 pass in the Cambridge BULATS exam. It is
More informationFirst Grade Curriculum Highlights: In alignment with the Common Core Standards
First Grade Curriculum Highlights: In alignment with the Common Core Standards ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS Foundational Skills Print Concepts Demonstrate understanding of the organization and basic features
More informationAN EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH TO NEW AND OLD INFORMATION IN TURKISH LOCATIVES AND EXISTENTIALS
AN EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH TO NEW AND OLD INFORMATION IN TURKISH LOCATIVES AND EXISTENTIALS Engin ARIK 1, Pınar ÖZTOP 2, and Esen BÜYÜKSÖKMEN 1 Doguş University, 2 Plymouth University enginarik@enginarik.com
More informationELA/ELD Standards Correlation Matrix for ELD Materials Grade 1 Reading
ELA/ELD Correlation Matrix for ELD Materials Grade 1 Reading The English Language Arts (ELA) required for the one hour of English-Language Development (ELD) Materials are listed in Appendix 9-A, Matrix
More informationOn the Notion Determiner
On the Notion Determiner Frank Van Eynde University of Leuven Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on Head-Driven Phrase Structure Grammar Michigan State University Stefan Müller (Editor) 2003
More informationConcept Acquisition Without Representation William Dylan Sabo
Concept Acquisition Without Representation William Dylan Sabo Abstract: Contemporary debates in concept acquisition presuppose that cognizers can only acquire concepts on the basis of concepts they already
More informationHoughton Mifflin Reading Correlation to the Common Core Standards for English Language Arts (Grade1)
Houghton Mifflin Reading Correlation to the Standards for English Language Arts (Grade1) 8.3 JOHNNY APPLESEED Biography TARGET SKILLS: 8.3 Johnny Appleseed Phonemic Awareness Phonics Comprehension Vocabulary
More informationMultiple case assignment and the English pseudo-passive *
Multiple case assignment and the English pseudo-passive * Norvin Richards Massachusetts Institute of Technology Previous literature on pseudo-passives (see van Riemsdijk 1978, Chomsky 1981, Hornstein &
More informationINTRODUCTION TO MORPHOLOGY Mark C. Baker and Jonathan David Bobaljik. Rutgers and McGill. Draft 6 INFLECTION
INTRODUCTION TO MORPHOLOGY 2002-2003 Mark C. Baker and Jonathan David Bobaljik Rutgers and McGill Draft 6 INFLECTION Many approaches to morphology, both traditional and generative, draw a distinction between
More informationChapter 4: Valence & Agreement CSLI Publications
Chapter 4: Valence & Agreement Reminder: Where We Are Simple CFG doesn t allow us to cross-classify categories, e.g., verbs can be grouped by transitivity (deny vs. disappear) or by number (deny vs. denies).
More informationOn-Line Data Analytics
International Journal of Computer Applications in Engineering Sciences [VOL I, ISSUE III, SEPTEMBER 2011] [ISSN: 2231-4946] On-Line Data Analytics Yugandhar Vemulapalli #, Devarapalli Raghu *, Raja Jacob
More informationProviding student writers with pre-text feedback
Providing student writers with pre-text feedback Ana Frankenberg-Garcia This paper argues that the best moment for responding to student writing is before any draft is completed. It analyses ways in which
More informationFlorida Reading Endorsement Alignment Matrix Competency 1
Florida Reading Endorsement Alignment Matrix Competency 1 Reading Endorsement Guiding Principle: Teachers will understand and teach reading as an ongoing strategic process resulting in students comprehending
More informationTHE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES & SOCIAL STUDIES
THE INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HUMANITIES & SOCIAL STUDIES PRO and Control in Lexical Functional Grammar: Lexical or Theory Motivated? Evidence from Kikuyu Njuguna Githitu Bernard Ph.D. Student, University
More informationA Computational Evaluation of Case-Assignment Algorithms
A Computational Evaluation of Case-Assignment Algorithms Miles Calabresi Advisors: Bob Frank and Jim Wood Submitted to the faculty of the Department of Linguistics in partial fulfillment of the requirements
More informationParallel Evaluation in Stratal OT * Adam Baker University of Arizona
Parallel Evaluation in Stratal OT * Adam Baker University of Arizona tabaker@u.arizona.edu 1.0. Introduction The model of Stratal OT presented by Kiparsky (forthcoming), has not and will not prove uncontroversial
More informationPhonological and Phonetic Representations: The Case of Neutralization
Phonological and Phonetic Representations: The Case of Neutralization Allard Jongman University of Kansas 1. Introduction The present paper focuses on the phenomenon of phonological neutralization to consider
More informationMyths, Legends, Fairytales and Novels (Writing a Letter)
Assessment Focus This task focuses on Communication through the mode of Writing at Levels 3, 4 and 5. Two linked tasks (Hot Seating and Character Study) that use the same context are available to assess
More informationA process by any other name
January 05, 2016 Roger Tregear A process by any other name thoughts on the conflicted use of process language What s in a name? That which we call a rose By any other name would smell as sweet. William
More informationMathematics Scoring Guide for Sample Test 2005
Mathematics Scoring Guide for Sample Test 2005 Grade 4 Contents Strand and Performance Indicator Map with Answer Key...................... 2 Holistic Rubrics.......................................................
More informationDIDACTIC MODEL BRIDGING A CONCEPT WITH PHENOMENA
DIDACTIC MODEL BRIDGING A CONCEPT WITH PHENOMENA Beba Shternberg, Center for Educational Technology, Israel Michal Yerushalmy University of Haifa, Israel The article focuses on a specific method of constructing
More informationPseudo-Passives as Adjectival Passives
Pseudo-Passives as Adjectival Passives Kwang-sup Kim Hankuk University of Foreign Studies English Department 81 Oedae-lo Cheoin-Gu Yongin-City 449-791 Republic of Korea kwangsup@hufs.ac.kr Abstract The
More informationA Pumpkin Grows. Written by Linda D. Bullock and illustrated by Debby Fisher
GUIDED READING REPORT A Pumpkin Grows Written by Linda D. Bullock and illustrated by Debby Fisher KEY IDEA This nonfiction text traces the stages a pumpkin goes through as it grows from a seed to become
More informationClassifying combinations: Do students distinguish between different types of combination problems?
Classifying combinations: Do students distinguish between different types of combination problems? Elise Lockwood Oregon State University Nicholas H. Wasserman Teachers College, Columbia University William
More informationON THE SYNTAX AND SEMANTICS
ON THE SYNTAX AND SEMANTICS OF NUMERALS IN ENGLISH Masaru Honda O. In his 1977 monograph, an extensive study of X syntax, Jackendoff attempts to accomplish cross-category generalizations by proposing a
More informationCAS LX 522 Syntax I. Long-distance wh-movement. Long distance wh-movement. Islands. Islands. Locality. NP Sea. NP Sea
19 CAS LX 522 Syntax I wh-movement and locality (9.1-9.3) Long-distance wh-movement What did Hurley say [ CP he was writing ]? This is a question: The highest C has a [Q] (=[clause-type:q]) feature and
More informationContext Free Grammars. Many slides from Michael Collins
Context Free Grammars Many slides from Michael Collins Overview I An introduction to the parsing problem I Context free grammars I A brief(!) sketch of the syntax of English I Examples of ambiguous structures
More informationUNDERSTANDING DECISION-MAKING IN RUGBY By. Dave Hadfield Sport Psychologist & Coaching Consultant Wellington and Hurricanes Rugby.
UNDERSTANDING DECISION-MAKING IN RUGBY By Dave Hadfield Sport Psychologist & Coaching Consultant Wellington and Hurricanes Rugby. Dave Hadfield is one of New Zealand s best known and most experienced sports
More informationDerivational and Inflectional Morphemes in Pak-Pak Language
Derivational and Inflectional Morphemes in Pak-Pak Language Agustina Situmorang and Tima Mariany Arifin ABSTRACT The objectives of this study are to find out the derivational and inflectional morphemes
More informationA Comparison of Charter Schools and Traditional Public Schools in Idaho
A Comparison of Charter Schools and Traditional Public Schools in Idaho Dale Ballou Bettie Teasley Tim Zeidner Vanderbilt University August, 2006 Abstract We investigate the effectiveness of Idaho charter
More informationA is an inde nite nominal pro-form that takes antecedents. ere have
One-Anaphora is not Ellipsis * Draft Please do not cite. University of Masschuse s Amherst September A is an inde nite nominal pro-form that takes antecedents. ere have been at least two references to
More informationThis is an author produced version of Syllabification patterns in Arabic dialects: long segments and mora sharing.
This is an author produced version of Syllabification patterns in Arabic dialects: long segents and ora sharing. White Rose Research Online URL for this paper: http://eprints.whiterose.ac.uk/75742/ Article:
More informationHindi-Urdu Phrase Structure Annotation
Hindi-Urdu Phrase Structure Annotation Rajesh Bhatt and Owen Rambow January 12, 2009 1 Design Principle: Minimal Commitments Binary Branching Representations. Mostly lexical projections (P,, AP, AdvP)
More informationThe College Board Redesigned SAT Grade 12
A Correlation of, 2017 To the Redesigned SAT Introduction This document demonstrates how myperspectives English Language Arts meets the Reading, Writing and Language and Essay Domains of Redesigned SAT.
More informationDeveloping a TT-MCTAG for German with an RCG-based Parser
Developing a TT-MCTAG for German with an RCG-based Parser Laura Kallmeyer, Timm Lichte, Wolfgang Maier, Yannick Parmentier, Johannes Dellert University of Tübingen, Germany CNRS-LORIA, France LREC 2008,
More informationUsing a Native Language Reference Grammar as a Language Learning Tool
Using a Native Language Reference Grammar as a Language Learning Tool Stacey I. Oberly University of Arizona & American Indian Language Development Institute Introduction This article is a case study in
More information"f TOPIC =T COMP COMP... OBJ
TREATMENT OF LONG DISTANCE DEPENDENCIES IN LFG AND TAG: FUNCTIONAL UNCERTAINTY IN LFG IS A COROLLARY IN TAG" Aravind K. Joshi Dept. of Computer & Information Science University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia,
More informationBasic Parsing with Context-Free Grammars. Some slides adapted from Julia Hirschberg and Dan Jurafsky 1
Basic Parsing with Context-Free Grammars Some slides adapted from Julia Hirschberg and Dan Jurafsky 1 Announcements HW 2 to go out today. Next Tuesday most important for background to assignment Sign up
More informationProcedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 154 ( 2014 )
Available online at www.sciencedirect.com ScienceDirect Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 154 ( 2014 ) 263 267 THE XXV ANNUAL INTERNATIONAL ACADEMIC CONFERENCE, LANGUAGE AND CULTURE, 20-22 October
More informationTagged for Deletion: A Typological Approach to VP Ellipsis in Tag Questions
Tagged for Deletion: A Typological Approach to VP Ellipsis in Tag Questions Craig Sailor cwsailor@ucla.edu UCLA Master s thesis 14 October 2009 Note to the reader: Apart from a few organizational and typographical
More informationOPTIMIZATINON OF TRAINING SETS FOR HEBBIAN-LEARNING- BASED CLASSIFIERS
OPTIMIZATINON OF TRAINING SETS FOR HEBBIAN-LEARNING- BASED CLASSIFIERS Václav Kocian, Eva Volná, Michal Janošek, Martin Kotyrba University of Ostrava Department of Informatics and Computers Dvořákova 7,
More informationGrade 11 Language Arts (2 Semester Course) CURRICULUM. Course Description ENGLISH 11 (2 Semester Course) Duration: 2 Semesters Prerequisite: None
Grade 11 Language Arts (2 Semester Course) CURRICULUM Course Description ENGLISH 11 (2 Semester Course) Duration: 2 Semesters Prerequisite: None Through the integrated study of literature, composition,
More informationNatural Language Processing. George Konidaris
Natural Language Processing George Konidaris gdk@cs.brown.edu Fall 2017 Natural Language Processing Understanding spoken/written sentences in a natural language. Major area of research in AI. Why? Humans
More informationDependency, licensing and the nature of grammatical relations *
UCL Working Papers in Linguistics 8 (1996) Dependency, licensing and the nature of grammatical relations * CHRISTIAN KREPS Abstract Word Grammar (Hudson 1984, 1990), in common with other dependency-based
More informationLinguistics. Undergraduate. Departmental Honors. Graduate. Faculty. Linguistics 1
Linguistics 1 Linguistics Matthew Gordon, Chair Interdepartmental Program in the College of Arts and Science 223 Tate Hall (573) 882-6421 gordonmj@missouri.edu Kibby Smith, Advisor Office of Multidisciplinary
More informationTaught Throughout the Year Foundational Skills Reading Writing Language RF.1.2 Demonstrate understanding of spoken words,
First Grade Standards These are the standards for what is taught in first grade. It is the expectation that these skills will be reinforced after they have been taught. Taught Throughout the Year Foundational
More informationUnderlying Representations
Underlying Representations The content of underlying representations. A basic issue regarding underlying forms is: what are they made of? We have so far treated them as segments represented as letters.
More informationessays personal admission college college personal admission
Personal essay for admission to college. to meet the individual essays for your paper and to adhere to personal academic standards 038; provide admission writing college. No for what the purpose of your
More informationLexical phonology. Marc van Oostendorp. December 6, Until now, we have presented phonological theory as if it is a monolithic
Lexical phonology Marc van Oostendorp December 6, 2005 Background Until now, we have presented phonological theory as if it is a monolithic unit. However, there is evidence that phonology consists of at
More informationAuthors note Chapter One Why Simpler Syntax? 1.1. Different notions of simplicity
Authors note: This document is an uncorrected prepublication version of the manuscript of Simpler Syntax, by Peter W. Culicover and Ray Jackendoff (Oxford: Oxford University Press. 2005). The actual published
More informationAn Empirical and Computational Test of Linguistic Relativity
An Empirical and Computational Test of Linguistic Relativity Kathleen M. Eberhard* (eberhard.1@nd.edu) Matthias Scheutz** (mscheutz@cse.nd.edu) Michael Heilman** (mheilman@nd.edu) *Department of Psychology,
More informationFoundations of Knowledge Representation in Cyc
Foundations of Knowledge Representation in Cyc Why use logic? CycL Syntax Collections and Individuals (#$isa and #$genls) Microtheories This is an introduction to the foundations of knowledge representation
More informationAGENDA LEARNING THEORIES LEARNING THEORIES. Advanced Learning Theories 2/22/2016
AGENDA Advanced Learning Theories Alejandra J. Magana, Ph.D. admagana@purdue.edu Introduction to Learning Theories Role of Learning Theories and Frameworks Learning Design Research Design Dual Coding Theory
More information1. Introduction. 2. The OMBI database editor
OMBI bilingual lexical resources: Arabic-Dutch / Dutch-Arabic Carole Tiberius, Anna Aalstein, Instituut voor Nederlandse Lexicologie Jan Hoogland, Nederlands Instituut in Marokko (NIMAR) In this paper
More informationLearning Methods in Multilingual Speech Recognition
Learning Methods in Multilingual Speech Recognition Hui Lin Department of Electrical Engineering University of Washington Seattle, WA 98125 linhui@u.washington.edu Li Deng, Jasha Droppo, Dong Yu, and Alex
More information