FUTURE INTERNET PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP
|
|
- Phebe Singleton
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 FUTURE INTERNET PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP CONCORD DELIVERABLE D4.5 FI PPP PROGRAMME SUPPORT Author(s): Petra Turkama, Mikko Riepula Date of Delivery: March 31 st, 2011 Version: See revision history on p. 2 Contract nro.:
2 2 DOCUMENT REFERENCE Project Acronym CONCORD ICT Project Number Project URL EU Project Officer Mr. Georgios Tselentis Coordinator Petra Turkama, Aalto University tel Deliverable Name Programme Support Deliverable No. 4.5 Nature Other Author(s) Petra Turkama, Mikko Riepula Abstract CONCORD Support for the FI PPP Projects and individual partners is a continuous, daily activity. The main new support activities during the reporting period were: - FI PPP Satisfaction Survey - FI PPP wiki at Wikispaces - Facilitation and driving of the vision, objectives and KPI discussion - Facilitation of FI PPP Programme Review report response and of implementation of the changes This deliverable summarises the main new support elements that CONCORD provided for the FI PPP Programme in the reporting period M12 of the Programme. This document includes also the CONCORD Project Quality Plan. Keywords CONCORD, FI PPP, Programme facilitation Date of Delivery March 31, 2012 Proof Reader for Quality Assurance Mikko Riepula, Jukka Mattila REVISION HISTORY Version No: Date: Description of Changes: Author(s): First Version Petra Turkama Minor changes Petra Turkama Added Section 7 Project Quality Plan Jukka Mattila Worked the plan to make it more practicable. Made the document less verbose overall. Revised grammar. Mikko Riepula
3 3 CONCORD DELIVERABLE ABOUT DELIVERABLE D4.5 As a complex and multi-faceted Programme FI PPP requires active coordination and supporting tools and processes for the Programme beneficiaries and other stakeholders to effectively share knowledge and co-innovate. Supporting tools include ICT tools, conceptual frameworks and facilitated events. The tools are chosen and/or developed in a demand-driven process in collaboration with other FI PPP partners. The present version now also incorporates the Project Quality Plan. 2. DESCRIPTION OF THE DELIVERABLE 4.5 The CONCORD support for the FI PPP Projects and individual partners is a continuous, daily activity. Support that initiated in the early stages of the Programme still continues through various channels: - Personal exchange - FI PPP mailing lists (SB@fi-ppp.eu; ab@fi-ppp.eu; dwg@fi-ppp.eu; standards@fi-ppp.eu, exploit-business@fi-ppp.eu, concord@fi-ppp.eu; all@fippp.eu) - Project portal member area: - FI PPP wiki at wikispaces - ARKADIN teleconference system - Facilitation of joint events The main new support activities introduced during the reporting period were: - FI PPP Satisfaction Survey - FI PPP wiki at Wikispaces ( - Facilitation and driving of the vision, objectives and KPI discussion
4 4 - Facilitation of FI PPP Programme Review report response and of implementation of the changes This deliverable summarises the main support elements that CONCORD implemented and provided for the FI PPP Programme in the reporting period. The present version now also incorporates the Project Quality Plan. 3. FI PPP SUPPORT AND FACILITATION PROCESSES SERVICE QUALITY SURVEY In line with the aim for continuous improvement and in order to be able to improve upon its facilitation processes aimed at other FI PPP projects, CONCORD conducted a survey of its service quality. The data was collected as an internet survey between December 12, 2011 and January 3, The respondents were divided into two groups: Active partners and Non-active partners. The Active partners consisted of those, who were active in co-working organs, such as Boards and Working Groups. The Non-active partners consisted of those, who were members of participants of the FI PPP Programme, but not actively involved in the management, administration or coordination duties. The results showed that the Programme has succeeded in creating the right atmosphere for mutual cooperation and has boosted the knowledge of the possibilities within the Programme. It also showed that co-working organs (like Architecture and Steering Boards, Working Groups etc.) were perceived essential for the success of the projects. On the development side the following were mentioned: focus of the internal communication; the need for more information about the supporting tools and coordination provided for the use of the Programme. As a result of the survey and the preceding M6 review, CONCORD has taken numerous actions to improve the coordination and support mechanisms for the Programme. CONCORD coordinator, Aalto University, has recently assigned an additional full-time project manager for the project in order to ensure strong project management and improved reporting. Cross-project collaboration has been improved through online
5 5 platforms for interaction as well as through facilitated face-to-face Use Case workshops gathering business development and project managers from all Use Case projects. Supporting evidence includes more details on this survey. It should be interpreted against its setting: the respondents were other programme participants. WORKING GROUPS Furthermore, three more Working Groups have been proposed by CONCORD in detailed proposals to the Steering Board, by now approved by the Steering Board, and they are gradually starting their operations. At the end of M12 the overall situation with the Working Groups is as follows. Dissemination Working Group (was running already before the current reporting period). Refer to the respective deliverable for the progress. (Work led by ENoLL.) Standardisation Working Group has had its first meeting in March 2012 and will continue with a second meeting in April Refer to the respective deliverable. (Work led by Aalto.) Exploitation and Business Modelling Working Group has been formally approved and will in part carry on the work started in the so-called Use Case Meetings. The March 26 th -27 th, 2012, Use Case Meeting gathered many of its initial members and introduced the scope and focus of the Working Group. First official meeting under that working group name will be in FIA Aalborg in May (Respective deliverables D3.3 and D3.5 were not due in M12. Work led by IBBT.) Policy and Regulatory Working Group has been formally approved in the March 27 th, 2012, Steering Board. Refer to the respective deliverable D3.6. (Work led by EIIR.) Security and Privacy Working Group is still in the preparatory phase. (Work led by TiViT.) In terms of external dissemination, CONCORD has made a prioritisation for the coming year in order to increase focus and impact. The Dissemination Working Group has made proposals for the main events and activities in an effort to better support the Programmelevel dissemination objectives. CONCORD has also improved its use of social media.
6 6 4. TOOLS TO FACILITATE ONLINE DISCUSSIONS AND MEETINGS CONCORD set up a wiki for FI PPP at to facilitate online discussions and work in between the meetings. The decision to use Wikispaces as the platform for collaborations was made in the Dec 15, 2011, Steering Board meeting (Meeting Minutes refer). Wikispaces is used for cross-project sharing in general and for preparations of the Steering Board meetings in particular. It has also been leveraged for the Use Case Meetings and Working Groups. The materials are stored in Wikispaces, where they are accessible for all members to edit, comment and discuss. In addition to being ed two weeks prior to each meeting, The Steering Board meeting invitation, agenda, and related materials are made available to Steering Board members in Wikispaces and can be updated when needed and commented by any Steering Board member. After each Steering Board meeting Aalto makes the draft meeting minutes available for any possible comments or remarks in the same place, again in addition to ing them to Steering Board members. (The Architecture Board facilitated by TiViT has chosen a different approach and is currently recording their minutes collaboratively in Google documents, which is mainly managed by the Chairman of the Architecture Board and thus not CONCORD. For better transparency, access to the above Wikispaces has been granted to all willing Architecture Board members.) Wikispaces has also been used in facilitating sharing between the Use Cases, as well as facilitating discussion on topical items, such as e.g. the FI PPP Programme-level KPIs and objectives; and the Collaboration Agreement and copies of the accession forms. Any account holder can add new pages or discussion topics. Currently restricting the access rights has not been deemed necessary any interested FI PPP participant has been able to register since the challenge is rather in the activation of Steering Board members and members of other working organs to prepare materials before the meetings and to share those with others. If and when the online discussion starts in earnest, it may become necessary to limit the write access so that the forums serve their original purposes.
7 7 In line with Programme review recommendation #9, TiViT has been tasked with a document collecting a short list of recommended tools for different purposes, along with the necessary justification that one can expect in such a document. As a concrete example of CONCORD s aim at reducing the number of different tools in use and at consolidating the numerous different functionalities, TiViT is investigating the possibility of moving the Wikis and related discussions on Wikispaces onto the web site, which runs on the Wordpress platform and is as such capable of hosting wikis also with appropriate access rights. CONCORD further continues to facilitate virtual meetings through the ARKADIN teleconference system. The system includes both the audio conferencing facility and a web portal, through which documents and comments can be shared during the meeting, and which keeps track of those who have dialled in. 5. FACILITATION OF FI PPP S PLAN OF ACTION AND RESPONSE TO THE M6 PROGRAMME REVIEW CONCORD facilitated the creation of an action plan to address the FI PPP Programmelevel evaluation at M6. The review report was received on January 26, 2012 and immediately shared with all FI PPP Partners, and discussed in the Steering Board the same day. CONCORD/Aalto facilitated and documented the discussion that took place after the January 26, 2012, Use Case Meeting and compiled a report of action points and clarifying commentaries that was submitted to the Commission as requested by the Steering Board in the end of February 2012 (Meeting Minutes refer). The said review report as well as FI PPP s Response to the review report can be found as separate documents among the review materials. The review report included numerous action points for the FI PPP Community. CONCORD has taken the first steps to implement the recommended changes, and will oversee that the recommended improvements will be implemented where feasible according to the plan. Furthermore, the Commission had invited a group of external reviewers to assess the progress and implementation of the Programme on March 19, Aalto as the Coordinator in CONCORD participated in this review meeting in a capacity of an informant and elaborated on the status of the Programme beyond the view that the evaluators obtained from the supplied documents. CONCORD further provided
8 8 recommendations for the upcoming Programme Phases based on their experience as facilitators. 6. FACILITATION OF CROSS-PROJECT KNOWLEDGE SHARING CONCORD strengthened Cross-Project Knowledge Sharing in October 2011 and followed up with physical Use Case meetings in January and March The main motivation for the cross-project sharing was better understanding of the shared assets for the preparations for Phase 2, as well as identification and sharing of benchmark practices among the projects. In these meetings the objectives and working methods were established among the group. The work on exploring commonalities and opportunities for cross-case work will continue online as well as bilaterally between the Use Case projects. After these first meetings the work will be institutionalised under the Exploitation and Business Model Working Group that was accepted by the Steering Board on February 21, 2012 (Meeting Minutes refer). The transition to a formal Exploitation and Business Model Working Group started in the second Use Case meeting in Brussels on March 26-27, This activity is documented in more detail in Deliverable D2.2 Methodologies and Tools for Use Case validation. 7. CONCORD QUALITY PLAN The Quality Plan presented herein has been prepared towards the end of the first year of the project but not yet fully implemented in all its details by M12. It may still undergo changes in the process of implementation, until a practicable way of balancing the quality objectives with the scarce resources and everyday project realities is found. BACKGROUND AND CONTEXT CONCORD is committed to working according to the rules laid out by the European Commission and in the Collaboration Agreement. The CONCORD Quality Plan will be implemented to improve upon the quality of its project management, activities and outcomes (including deliverables). In this context, quality refers to proper processes, accuracy, timeliness and content of the work and the deliverables. The Quality Plan identifies the preventive activities that promote the development of quality components
9 9 and the appraisal activities that ensure the components produced meet the explicit CONCORD quality requirements and general quality standards. Achieving high quality in the CONCORD project rests on the Project meeting (CONCORD meetings usually held once every two weeks by teleconference, with all active collaborators of all CONCORD partner organizations), the Project Manager, and the Work Package Leaders. Each work package (WP) is led by a Work Package Leader (WPL), who as an organisation is responsible for the work carried out within the work package. It is up to the said organization to appoint and empower its employee to take on this WPL responsibility on behalf of its organization. Such a person needs not only be formally qualified, but also interested in the results and available to commit a sufficient share of his/her time to taking care of the task. (Part-time arrangements are not necessarily sufficient.) The WPL provides reports to the CONCORD meeting detailing the evolution of the work and the achieved results, as well as any problems or risks identified. The coordination between work packages is handled by the Project Manager. Ultimately the quality of the work and resulting deliverables rests with all Parties to the CONCORD Consortium Agreement and assumes every Party not only to lead their designated tasks and to contribute to others by default as stipulated in the Description of Work, save for any other agreement but also to be proactive and come up with results. Therefore managing the evolution of the consortium is a key quality control measure available to the Coordinator and the General Assembly. The responses and recommendations from the yearly Project Review by the European Commission will serve in part for this purpose. Since the project is contractually and money-wise first and foremost made up of different organizations as legal entities (the Parties), the quality control measures must fairly soon act upon these, if quality is not resulting from the more immediate and day-to-day measures. The Project Handbook details quality control measures for both work processes and the deliverables. It describes the initial creation and evaluation of efficient work processes for the work packages as well as a general work process for the project that ensures the synchronized work package processes. The handling of project reports related to project deliverables and/or milestones is also be described. The Project Handbook includes a general description of the procedure for the acceptance of reports as well as for technical implementations. That also includes a description of how work results, deliverables and review reports are managed and stored. For all this to have the
10 1 0 expected value, the Project Handbook should be frequently updated and disseminated by the Coordinator and its contents discussed by and between the project members. SCHEDULE MANAGEMENT For keeping the time schedules CONCORD applies coordinated planning and follow-up in CONCORD project meetings. The overall project, tasks and subtasks schedule is presented in the work plan and will be monitored by the Project Manager on a bi-weekly (once in two weeks) basis by assessing the project deliverables, goals and the progress towards agreed targets. CONCORD meeting holds bi-weekly schedule updates/reviews, and determines impacts of schedule variances; submits schedule change requests; and reports schedule status in accordance with the Programme s internal and external communications plan. The CONCORD project will deliver periodic reports to the Commission as described in the review schedule. CONTRACT MANAGEMENT The activities performed in connection with the project are evaluated in weekly meetings of the CONCORD coordination team at Aalto University CKIR. Plans and schedules are updated and evaluated with all consortium members in the bi-weekly CONCORD meetings, described above. CONCORD reports of the advancement of the coordination and support activities to the FI PPP Steering Board on a monthly basis not as a separate agenda point but usually embedded and linked to several agenda points. In addition to the commitments towards the European Commission, CONCORD has obligations also towards the other FI PPP Projects, as stated in the FI PPP Collaboration Agreement. The agreement details the responsibilities and liabilities of each complementary beneficiary in the FI PPP Programme stipulated in the EC-developed Special Clause No. 41 to the Grant Agreement. This Special Clause aims at cooperation between FI PPP projects and provides for a minimum of access rights to all parties. All CONCORD deliverables are Public to all FI PPP Beneficiaries. DELIVERABLE REVIEW PROCESS The Work Package Leader (WPL) is responsible for the timely completion of deliverables and for its own resource usage therein. Details of the planning and progress within the work package shall be passed on to the Project Steering Group by the WPL manager for consideration and support as needed. The Work Package Leader shall assign work
11 1 1 groups for different tasks, plan and control activities within their work package, prepare deliverables; collect contribution from partners participating in the work package, check results of different partners working on their tasks, identifying any possible problems or deviations from plans, and control its own costs in the scope of the work package budget. The WPL is also responsible for quality control of deliverables within the work package, following this Quality Plan. The main instrument of ensuring the quality of the deliverables is the Deliverable Review Process, described below. From M18 on, all deliverables produced as part of the project shall undergo the below quality management and review process every 6 months, even if no yearly project review was due for that half-year cycle. 1. The author responsible for drafting the documents (WPL if not otherwise specified), is also responsible for having them proof-read for the English language by a capable individual not involved in the drafting. If necessary (if e.g. language skills in the organisation are scarce or deficient), the responsible organisation shall use the services of a professional proofreader or language editor. 2. The author of the deliverable submits the final drafts of deliverable documents to the WPL at least 14 working days prior to the deadline indicated in the Work Plan. The Work Package Leader assigns a person involved in CONCORD to review the document for the subject matter. 3. The reviewer shall review the draft deliverable within 7 working days after receiving the draft deliverable and send an notification to the author of the deliverable and the WPL recommending the WPL to either a) approve the deliverable (possibly with minor corrections as the reviewer may suggest) or to b) require major changes. The WPL shall then take this recommendation into account and with the other information on the deliverable as may be available to the WPL, the WPL shall then either a) approve a specified version of the deliverable or b) specify changes the author should perform, and in both cases notify the author of the same. The WPL shall leave no less than 7 calendar days for the author to complete those corrections before final submission within the original deadline. The corrections made shall be clearly and explicitly made visible by such revision marks that the WPL and the reviewer can verify they are carried out accordingly. 4. The WPL will record the approval of the specific document version, and the assigned reviewers, as well as the change history will be recorded in the
12 1 2 deliverables tracking sheet visible to all Parties concerned and editable by the WPL and Project Manager. NB: the act of approving a specific version thus does not change that deliverable document or file itself, as the status information is recorded in the deliverables tracking sheet and not the document itself. All written documents (interim reports, progress reports, etc.) as well as data generated during the Project will be stored electronically in the Project Knowledge Centre. Paper copies of all official documents are filed in the Aalto University archives. A part of the deliverable quality is the maintenance of a project library containing all project documents, deliverables, and background material. OVERALL QUALITY ASSURANCE IN THE PROGRAMME Between M12 and M24 CONCORD will further align this Quality Plan with the objectives and mechanisms of the yearly project review by the EC-appointed independent reviewers as well as the FI PPP programme evaluations.
WP 2: Project Quality Assurance. Quality Manual
Ask Dad and/or Mum Parents as Key Facilitators: an Inclusive Approach to Sexual and Relationship Education on the Home Environment WP 2: Project Quality Assurance Quality Manual Country: Denmark Author:
More informationHigher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd. Hertfordshire International College
Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd April 2016 Contents About this review... 1 Key findings... 2 QAA's judgements about... 2 Good practice... 2 Theme: Digital Literacies...
More informationPROJECT PERIODIC REPORT
D1.3: 2 nd Annual Report Project Number: 212879 Reporting period: 1/11/2008-31/10/2009 PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT Grant Agreement number: 212879 Project acronym: EURORIS-NET Project title: European Research
More informationH2020 Marie Skłodowska Curie Innovative Training Networks Informal guidelines for the Mid-Term Meeting
H2020 Marie Skłodowska Curie Innovative Training Networks Informal guidelines for the Mid-Term Meeting These guidelines are not an official document of the Research Executive Agency services. June 2016
More informationNavitas UK Holdings Ltd Embedded College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education
Navitas UK Holdings Ltd Embedded College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education February 2014 Annex: Birmingham City University International College Introduction
More informationSchool Leadership Rubrics
School Leadership Rubrics The School Leadership Rubrics define a range of observable leadership and instructional practices that characterize more and less effective schools. These rubrics provide a metric
More informationD.10.7 Dissemination Conference - Conference Minutes
Project No. 540346-LLP-1-2013-1-GR-LEONARDO-LNW D.10.7 Dissemination Conference - Conference Minutes Effective Writers & Communicators Project September 2015 This project has been funded with support from
More informationDOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BOARD PhD PROGRAM REVIEW PROTOCOL
DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY BOARD PhD PROGRAM REVIEW PROTOCOL Overview of the Doctor of Philosophy Board The Doctor of Philosophy Board (DPB) is a standing committee of the Johns Hopkins University that reports
More informationMarie Skłodowska-Curie Actions in H2020
Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions in H2020 Paris 23 May 2014 Oscar Barreiro Research Executive Agency European Commission Date: in 12 pts Horizon 2020 Why a People programme? Industry? Academia? Who produces
More informationOklahoma State University Policy and Procedures
Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures REAPPOINTMENT, PROMOTION AND TENURE PROCESS FOR RANKED FACULTY 2-0902 ACADEMIC AFFAIRS September 2015 PURPOSE The purpose of this policy and procedures letter
More informationBachelor of Software Engineering: Emerging sustainable partnership with industry in ODL
Bachelor of Software Engineering: Emerging sustainable partnership with industry in ODL L.S.K. UDUGAMA, JANAKA LIYANAGAMA Faculty of Engineering Technology The Open University of Sri Lanka POBox 21, Nawala,
More informationCouncil of the European Union Brussels, 4 November 2015 (OR. en)
Council of the European Union Brussels, 4 November 2015 (OR. en) 13631/15 NOTE From: To: General Secretariat of the Council JEUN 96 EDUC 285 SOC 633 EMPL 416 CULT 73 SAN 356 Permanent Representatives Committee/Council
More informationehealth Governance Initiative: Joint Action JA-EHGov & Thematic Network SEHGovIA DELIVERABLE Version: 2.4 Date:
ehealth Governance Initiative: Joint Action JA-EHGov & Thematic Network SEHGovIA DELIVERABLE JA D4.1.1 Strategy & Policy Alignment Documents I WP4 (JA) - Policy Development and Strategy Alignment Version:
More informationStakeholder Engagement and Communication Plan (SECP)
Stakeholder Engagement and Communication Plan (SECP) Summary box REVIEW TITLE 3ie GRANT CODE AUTHORS (specify review team members who have completed this form) FOCAL POINT (specify primary contact for
More informationEOSC Governance Development Forum 4 May 2017 Per Öster
EOSC Governance Development Forum 4 May 2017 Per Öster per.oster@csc.fi Governance Development Forum Enable stakeholders to contribute to the governance development A platform for information, dialogue,
More informationDelaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators
Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators DPAS-II Guide for Administrators (Assistant Principals) Guide for Evaluating Assistant Principals Revised August
More informationFreshman On-Track Toolkit
The Network for College Success Freshman On-Track Toolkit 2nd Edition: July 2017 I Table of Contents About the Network for College Success NCS Core Values and Beliefs About the Toolkit Toolkit Organization
More informationREVIEW CYCLES: FACULTY AND LIBRARIANS** CANDIDATES HIRED ON OR AFTER JULY 14, 2014 SERVICE WHO REVIEWS WHEN CONTRACT
REVIEW CYCLES: FACULTY AND LIBRARIANS** CANDIDATES HIRED ON OR AFTER JULY 14, 2014 YEAR OF FOR WHAT SERVICE WHO REVIEWS WHEN CONTRACT FIRST DEPARTMENT SPRING 2 nd * DEAN SECOND DEPARTMENT FALL 3 rd & 4
More informationSchool Inspection in Hesse/Germany
Hessisches Kultusministerium School Inspection in Hesse/Germany Contents 1. Introduction...2 2. School inspection as a Procedure for Quality Assurance and Quality Enhancement...2 3. The Hessian framework
More informationProgramme Specification. MSc in International Real Estate
Programme Specification MSc in International Real Estate IRE GUIDE OCTOBER 2014 ROYAL AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY, CIRENCESTER PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION MSc International Real Estate NB The information contained
More informationDelaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators
Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators DPAS-II Guide (Revised) for Teachers Updated August 2017 Table of Contents I. Introduction to DPAS II Purpose of
More informationContents. (1) Activities Units of learning outcomes and expert interviews... 2
Contents (1) Activities... 2 Units of learning outcomes and expert interviews... 2 Allocation of ECVET-points and assessment of learning outcomes... 2 Meeting of EASYMetal advisory committee... 2 Meeting
More informationDRAFT - Meeting Agenda Schwerin 13 th of Novembre till 14 th of Novembre 2014
DRAFT - Meeting Agenda Schwerin 13 th of Novembre till 14 th of Novembre 2014 PROJECT STAY IN PROJECT NUMBER LLP-LDV-TOI-13-AT-0010 Location of accommodation: All partners are hosted at the InterCity Hotel
More informationChapter 2. University Committee Structure
Chapter 2 University Structure 2. UNIVERSITY COMMITTEE STRUCTURE This chapter provides details of the membership and terms of reference of Senate, the University s senior academic committee, and its Standing
More informationStatewide Strategic Plan for e-learning in California s Child Welfare Training System
Statewide Strategic Plan for e-learning in California s Child Welfare Training System Decision Point Outline December 14, 2009 Vision CalSWEC, the schools of social work, the regional training academies,
More informationREVIEW CYCLES: FACULTY AND LIBRARIANS** CANDIDATES HIRED PRIOR TO JULY 14, 2014 SERVICE WHO REVIEWS WHEN CONTRACT
REVIEW CYCLES: FACULTY AND LIBRARIANS** CANDIDATES HIRED PRIOR TO JULY 14, 2014 YEAR OF FOR WHAT SERVICE WHO REVIEWS WHEN CONTRACT FIFTH DEPARTMENT FALL 6 th & Tenure SENATE DEAN PROVOST, PRESIDENT NOTES:
More informationDiploma in Library and Information Science (Part-Time) - SH220
Diploma in Library and Information Science (Part-Time) - SH220 1. Objectives The Diploma in Library and Information Science programme aims to prepare students for professional work in librarianship. The
More informationLismore Comprehensive School
Lismore Comprehensive School Caring and Learning Together Examinations Policy Policy for External Examinations As a school we in Lismore want our pupils to leave with relevant qualifications in preparation
More informationFUNDING GUIDELINES APPLICATION FORM BANKSETA Doctoral & Post-Doctoral Research Funding
FUNDING GUIDELINES Doctoral & Post-Doctoral Research Funding Project: Phd and Post-Doctoral Grant Funding Funding Opens on: 18 April 2016 Funding Window Closes on: 16 May 2016 FUNDING GUIDELINES APPLICATION
More informationUniversity of Toronto
University of Toronto OFFICE OF THE VICE PRESIDENT AND PROVOST Governance and Administration of Extra-Departmental Units Interdisciplinarity Committee Working Group Report Following approval by Governing
More informationEducation: Professional Experience: Personnel leadership and management
Cathie Cline, Ed.D. Education: Ed.D., Higher Education, University of Arkansas at Little Rock, December 2006. Dissertation: The Influence of Faculty-Student Interaction on Graduation Rates at Rural Two-Year
More informationIntroduction to Moodle
Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning Mr. Philip Daoud Introduction to Moodle Beginner s guide Center for Excellence in Teaching and Learning / Teaching Resource This manual is part of a serious
More informationHigher education is becoming a major driver of economic competitiveness
Executive Summary Higher education is becoming a major driver of economic competitiveness in an increasingly knowledge-driven global economy. The imperative for countries to improve employment skills calls
More informationANNUAL CURRICULUM REVIEW PROCESS for the 2016/2017 Academic Year
ANNUAL CURRICULUM REVIEW PROCESS for the 2016/2017 Academic Year Annual Curriculum review is a process undertaken in advance of each new academic year to renew, revise and update curriculum. Faculty members,
More informationThe AFR PhD and Postdoc Grant Scheme for Research Training in Luxembourg
The AFR PhD and Postdoc Grant Scheme for Research Training in Luxembourg 0 ENRC 18 May 2011, Brussels Presentation by Marie-Claude Marx (PhD) Contact: marie-claude.marx@fnr.lu The FNR s activities in brief
More informationReferencing the Danish Qualifications Framework for Lifelong Learning to the European Qualifications Framework
Referencing the Danish Qualifications for Lifelong Learning to the European Qualifications Referencing the Danish Qualifications for Lifelong Learning to the European Qualifications 2011 Referencing the
More informationBY-LAWS THE COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA
BY-LAWS THE COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA BY-LAWS THE COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA Table
More informationState Parental Involvement Plan
A Toolkit for Title I Parental Involvement Section 3 Tools Page 41 Tool 3.1: State Parental Involvement Plan Description This tool serves as an example of one SEA s plan for supporting LEAs and schools
More informationPresentation Advice for your Professional Review
Presentation Advice for your Professional Review This document contains useful tips for both aspiring engineers and technicians on: managing your professional development from the start planning your Review
More informationRegional Bureau for Education in Africa (BREDA)
United Nations Education, Scientific and Cultural Organization Regional Bureau for Education in Africa (BREDA) Regional Conference on Higher Education in Africa (CRESA) 10-13 November 2008 Preparatory
More informationParticipant Report Form Call 2015 KA1 Mobility of Staff in higher education - Staff mobility for teaching and training activities
Participant Report Form Call 2015 KA1 Mobility of Staff in higher education - Staff mobility for teaching and training activities Fields marked with are mandatory. 1 Purpose of the participant report This
More informationNSU Oceanographic Center Directions for the Thesis Track Student
NSU Oceanographic Center Directions for the Thesis Track Student This publication is designed to help students through the various stages of their Ph.D. degree. For full requirements, please consult the
More informationIrtiqa a Programme: Guide for the inspection of schools in The Emirate of Abu Dhabi
Irtiqa a Programme: Guide for the inspection of schools in The Emirate of Abu Dhabi August 2015 Table of Contents Page Irtiqa a programme vision, mission, core values and objectives 4 1. Why are schools
More informationInterim Review of the Public Engagement with Research Catalysts Programme 2012 to 2015
Interim Review of the Public Engagement with Research Catalysts Programme 2012 to 2015 A report for Research Councils UK March 2016 FULL REPORT Report author: Ruth Townsley, Independent Researcher Summary
More informationMANAGEMENT CHARTER OF THE FOUNDATION HET RIJNLANDS LYCEUM
MANAGEMENT CHARTER OF THE FOUNDATION HET RIJNLANDS LYCEUM Article 1. Definitions. 1.1 This management charter uses the following definitions: (a) the Executive Board : the Executive Board of the Foundation,
More informationOCR LEVEL 3 CAMBRIDGE TECHNICAL
Cambridge TECHNICALS OCR LEVEL 3 CAMBRIDGE TECHNICAL CERTIFICATE/DIPLOMA IN IT SYSTEMS ANALYSIS K/505/5481 LEVEL 3 UNIT 34 GUIDED LEARNING HOURS: 60 UNIT CREDIT VALUE: 10 SYSTEMS ANALYSIS K/505/5481 LEVEL
More informationDeliverable n. 6 Report on Financing and Co- Finacing of Internships
TRANSNATIONAL PLACEMENT SCHEME FOR TRANSLATION STUDENTS Agreement Number: 2012-3831/001-001 - Project Number: 526642- LLP- 1-2012- 1- IT- ERASMUS- ECUE Deliverable n. 6 Report on Financing and Co- Finacing
More informationREGULATIONS FOR POSTGRADUATE RESEARCH STUDY. September i -
REGULATIONS FOR POSTGRADUATE RESEARCH STUDY September 2013 - i - REGULATIONS FOR POSTGRADUATE RESEARCH STUDY Approved by CIT Academic Council, April 2013 - ii - TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION: THE RESEARCH
More informationPartnership Agreement
Bestyrelsesmøde nr. 41, 15. september 2009 Pkt. 07 Bilag 1.2. Draft August 21, 2009 Partnership Agreement Between Graduate University of Chinese Academy of Sciences (GUCAS) and University of Copenhagen
More informationCOMMUNICATION PLAN. We believe that all individuals are valuable and worthy of respect.
COMMUNICATION PLAN MISSION STATEMENT The mission of the Tipp City Exempted Village Schools is to provide an exemplary education so that all students become responsible participants in society. VISION The
More informationGuidelines for Mobilitas Pluss postdoctoral grant applications
Annex 1 APPROVED by the Management Board of the Estonian Research Council on 23 March 2016, Directive No. 1-1.4/16/63 Guidelines for Mobilitas Pluss postdoctoral grant applications 1. Scope The guidelines
More informationGuidelines for Mobilitas Pluss top researcher grant applications
Annex 1 APPROVED by the Management Board of the Estonian Research Council on 23 March 2016, Directive No. 1-1.4/16/63 Guidelines for Mobilitas Pluss top researcher grant applications 1. Scope The guidelines
More informationUniversity of Toronto
University of Toronto OFFICE OF THE VICE PRESIDENT AND PROVOST Framework for the Divisional Appeals Processes The purpose of the Framework is to provide guidance and advice for the establishment of appropriate
More informationConceptual Framework: Presentation
Meeting: Meeting Location: International Public Sector Accounting Standards Board New York, USA Meeting Date: December 3 6, 2012 Agenda Item 2B For: Approval Discussion Information Objective(s) of Agenda
More informationDICE - Final Report. Project Information Project Acronym DICE Project Title
DICE - Final Report Project Information Project Acronym DICE Project Title Digital Communication Enhancement Start Date November 2011 End Date July 2012 Lead Institution London School of Economics and
More informationTRI-STATE CONSORTIUM Wappingers CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
TRI-STATE CONSORTIUM Wappingers CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT Consultancy Special Education: January 11-12, 2016 Table of Contents District Visit Information 3 Narrative 4 Thoughts in Response to the Questions
More informationEvaluation Report Output 01: Best practices analysis and exhibition
Evaluation Report Output 01: Best practices analysis and exhibition Report: SEN Employment Links Output 01: Best practices analysis and exhibition The report describes the progress of work and outcomes
More informationExaminations Officer Part-Time Term-Time 27.5 hours per week
SULLIVAN UPPER SCHOOL, HOLYWOOD Examinations Officer Part-Time Term-Time 27.5 hours per week 1. INTRODUCTION AND TITLE OF THE POST Sullivan Upper School wishes to recruit an enthusiastic individual who
More informationExecution Plan for Software Engineering Education in Taiwan
2012 19th Asia-Pacific Software Engineering Conference Execution Plan for Software Engineering Education in Taiwan Jonathan Lee 1, Alan Liu 2, Yu Chin Cheng 3, Shang-Pin Ma 4, and Shin-Jie Lee 1 1 Department
More informationINSTRUCTOR USER MANUAL/HELP SECTION
Criterion INSTRUCTOR USER MANUAL/HELP SECTION ngcriterion Criterion Online Writing Evaluation June 2013 Chrystal Anderson REVISED SEPTEMBER 2014 ANNA LITZ Criterion User Manual TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 INTRODUCTION...3
More informationRules and Regulations of Doctoral Studies
Annex to the SGH Senate Resolution no.590 of 22 February 2012 Rules and Regulations of Doctoral Studies at the Warsaw School of Economics Preliminary provisions 1 1. Rules and Regulations of doctoral studies
More informationInstitutional review. University of Wales, Newport. November 2010
Institutional review University of Wales, Newport November 2010 The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education 2011 ISBN 978 1 84979 260 8 All QAA's publications are available on our website www.qaa.ac.uk
More informationDocument number: 2013/ Programs Committee 6/2014 (July) Agenda Item 42.0 Bachelor of Engineering with Honours in Software Engineering
Document number: 2013/0006139 Programs Committee 6/2014 (July) Agenda Item 42.0 Bachelor of Engineering with Honours in Software Engineering Program Learning Outcomes Threshold Learning Outcomes for Engineering
More informationQuality assurance of Authority-registered subjects and short courses
Quality assurance of Authority-registered subjects and short courses 170133 The State of Queensland () 2017 PO Box 307 Spring Hill QLD 4004 Australia 154 Melbourne Street, South Brisbane Phone: (07) 3864
More informationKelso School District and Kelso Education Association Teacher Evaluation Process (TPEP)
Kelso School District and Kelso Education Association 2015-2017 Teacher Evaluation Process (TPEP) Kelso School District and Kelso Education Association 2015-2017 Teacher Evaluation Process (TPEP) TABLE
More informationMandatory Review of Social Skills Qualifications. Consultation document for Approval to List
Mandatory Review of Social Skills Qualifications Consultation document for Approval to List February 2015 Prepared by: National Qualifications Services on behalf of the Social Skills Governance Group 1
More informationEDUCATION AND DECENTRALIZATION
EDUCATION AND DECENTRALIZATION Skopje, 2006 Education and Decentralization: User-friendly Manual Author: Jovan Ananiev, MSc. Project management: OSCE Spillover Monitor Mission to Skopje/Confidence Building
More informationAppendix IX. Resume of Financial Aid Director. Professional Development Training
Appendix IX Resume of Financial Aid Director Professional Development Training ALBERT TEZENO 6815 Chapelfield Houston Texas 77049 Tezeno_aj@yahoo.com 281-459-4114 cell 832-642-6937 Director of Financial
More informationSOCRATES PROGRAMME GUIDELINES FOR APPLICANTS
SOCRATES PROGRAMME GUIDELINES FOR APPLICANTS The present document contains a description of the financial support available under all parts of the Community action programme in the field of education,
More informationPROGRAMME SPECIFICATION
PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION 1 Awarding Institution Newcastle University 2 Teaching Institution Newcastle University 3 Final Award M.Sc. 4 Programme Title Industrial and Commercial Biotechnology 5 UCAS/Programme
More informationLIFELONG LEARNING PROGRAMME ERASMUS Academic Network
SOCRATES THEMATIC NETWORK AQUACULTURE, FISHERIES AND AQUATIC RESOURCE MANAGEMENT 2008-11 LIFELONG LEARNING PROGRAMME ERASMUS Academic Network Minutes of the WP 1 Core Group Meeting (year 2) May 31 st June
More informationMeeting of the Senatus Researcher Experience Committee to be held on Thursday, 27 May 2010 at 2.15 p.m. in the Lord Provost Elder Room, Old College
H/02/26/02 REC: 27.5.10. Meeting of the Senatus Researcher Experience Committee to be held on Thursday, 27 May 2010 at 2.15 p.m. in the Lord Provost Elder Room, Old College A G E N D A 1. The University
More informationEUROPEAN UNIVERSITIES LOOKING FORWARD WITH CONFIDENCE PRAGUE DECLARATION 2009
EUROPEAN UNIVERSITIES LOOKING FORWARD WITH CONFIDENCE PRAGUE DECLARATION 2009 Copyright 2009 by the European University Association All rights reserved. This information may be freely used and copied for
More informationGuidelines for Project I Delivery and Assessment Department of Industrial and Mechanical Engineering Lebanese American University
Guidelines for Project I Delivery and Assessment Department of Industrial and Mechanical Engineering Lebanese American University Approved: July 6, 2009 Amended: July 28, 2009 Amended: October 30, 2009
More informatione-portfolios in Australian education and training 2008 National Symposium Report
e-portfolios in Australian education and training 2008 National Symposium Report Contents Understanding e-portfolios: Education.au National Symposium 2 Summary of key issues 2 e-portfolios 2 e-portfolio
More informationMathematics Program Assessment Plan
Mathematics Program Assessment Plan Introduction This assessment plan is tentative and will continue to be refined as needed to best fit the requirements of the Board of Regent s and UAS Program Review
More informationPROGRAMME SPECIFICATION
PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION 1 Awarding Institution Newcastle University 2 Teaching Institution Newcastle University 3 Final Award MSc 4 Programme Title Digital Architecture 5 UCAS/Programme Code 5112 6 Programme
More informationThe Referencing of the Irish National Framework of Qualifications to EQF
The Referencing of the Irish National Framework of Qualifications to EQF National Qualifications Frameworks in an International perspective Brussels 30 November 2009 Dr Jim Murray National Qualifications
More informationResearcher Development Assessment A: Knowledge and intellectual abilities
Researcher Development Assessment A: Knowledge and intellectual abilities Domain A: Knowledge and intellectual abilities This domain relates to the knowledge and intellectual abilities needed to be able
More informationSt. Mary Cathedral Parish & School
Parish School Governance St. Mary Cathedral Parish & School School Advisory Council Constitution Approved by Parish Pastoral Council April 25, 2014 -i- Constitution of the St. Mary Cathedral School Advisory
More informationWildlife, Fisheries, & Conservation Biology
Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, & Conservation Biology The Department of Wildlife, Fisheries, & Conservation Biology in the College of Natural Sciences, Forestry and Agriculture offers graduate study
More informationRaj Soin College of Business Bylaws
Raj Soin College of Business Bylaws Approved October 8, 2002 Amended June 8, 2010 Amended January 30, 2013 These bylaws establish policies and procedures required by the Collective Bargaining Agreement.
More informationStudent Assessment Policy: Education and Counselling
Student Assessment Policy: Education and Counselling Title: Student Assessment Policy: Education and Counselling Author: Academic Dean Approved by: Academic Board Date: February 2014 Review date: February
More informationGALICIAN TEACHERS PERCEPTIONS ON THE USABILITY AND USEFULNESS OF THE ODS PORTAL
The Fifth International Conference on e-learning (elearning-2014), 22-23 September 2014, Belgrade, Serbia GALICIAN TEACHERS PERCEPTIONS ON THE USABILITY AND USEFULNESS OF THE ODS PORTAL SONIA VALLADARES-RODRIGUEZ
More informationEvaluation of Learning Management System software. Part II of LMS Evaluation
Version DRAFT 1.0 Evaluation of Learning Management System software Author: Richard Wyles Date: 1 August 2003 Part II of LMS Evaluation Open Source e-learning Environment and Community Platform Project
More informationGuidelines for Completion of an Application for Temporary Licence under Section 24 of the Architects Act R.S.O. 1990
Guidelines for Completion of an Application for Temporary Licence under Section 24 of the Architects Act R.S.O. 1990 OAA-12-16 1 INDEX Page Number General... 3 Fees for Temporary Licence... 4 Appendix
More informationDeveloping ICT-rich lifelong learning opportunities through EU-projects DECTUG case study
Developing ICT-rich lifelong learning opportunities through EU-projects DECTUG case study 1997-2003 Anna Grabowska Head of Distance Education Centre at Gdansk University of Technology, G. Narutowicza 11/12,
More informationStandards and Criteria for Demonstrating Excellence in BACCALAUREATE/GRADUATE DEGREE PROGRAMS
Standards and Criteria for Demonstrating Excellence in BACCALAUREATE/GRADUATE DEGREE PROGRAMS World Headquarters 11520 West 119th Street Overland Park, KS 66213 USA USA Belgium Perú acbsp.org info@acbsp.org
More informationBusiness. Pearson BTEC Level 1 Introductory in. Specification
Pearson BTEC Level 1 Introductory in Business Specification Pearson BTEC Level 1 Introductory Certificate in Business Pearson BTEC Level 1 Introductory Diploma in Business Pearson BTEC Level 1 Introductory
More informationOrientation Workshop on Outcome Based Accreditation. May 21st, 2016
Orientation Workshop on Outcome Based Accreditation May 21st, 2016 ABOUT NBA Established in the year 1994 under Section 10 (u) of AICTE Act. NBA became Autonomous in January 2010 and in April 2013 the
More informationProgramme Specification. MSc in Palliative Care: Global Perspectives (Distance Learning) Valid from: September 2012 Faculty of Health & Life Sciences
Programme Specification MSc in Palliative Care: Global Perspectives (Distance Learning) Valid from: September 2012 Faculty of Health & Life Sciences SECTION 1: GENERAL INFORMATION Awarding body: Teaching
More informationChamilo 2.0: A Second Generation Open Source E-learning and Collaboration Platform
Chamilo 2.0: A Second Generation Open Source E-learning and Collaboration Platform doi:10.3991/ijac.v3i3.1364 Jean-Marie Maes University College Ghent, Ghent, Belgium Abstract Dokeos used to be one of
More informationConditions of study and examination regulations of the. European Master of Science in Midwifery
Conditions of study and examination regulations of the European Master of Science in Midwifery Midwifery Research and Education Unit Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology Hannover Medical School September
More informationConventions. Declarations. Communicates
Conventions Declarations Communicates European Treaty Series - No. 165 CONVENTION ON THE RECOGNITION OF QUALIFICATIONS CONCERNING HIGHER EDUCATION IN THE EUROPEAN REGION Lisbon, 11.IV.1997 2 ETS 165 Recognition
More informationIEP AMENDMENTS AND IEP CHANGES
You supply the passion & dedication. IEP AMENDMENTS AND IEP CHANGES We ll support your daily practice. Who s here? ~ Something you want to learn more about 10 Basic Steps in Special Education Child is
More informationb) Allegation means information in any form forwarded to a Dean relating to possible Misconduct in Scholarly Activity.
University Policy University Procedure Instructions/Forms Integrity in Scholarly Activity Policy Classification Research Approval Authority General Faculties Council Implementation Authority Provost and
More informationPosition Statements. Index of Association Position Statements
ts Association position statements address key issues for Pre-K-12 education and describe the shared beliefs that direct united action by boards of education/conseil scolaire fransaskois and their Association.
More informationHigher Education Review of University of Hertfordshire
Higher Education Review of University of Hertfordshire December 2015 Contents About this review... 1 Key findings... 2 QAA's judgements about the University of Hertfordshire... 2 Good practice... 2 Affirmation
More informationPROJECT DESCRIPTION SLAM
PROJECT DESCRIPTION SLAM STUDENT LEADERSHIP ADVANCEMENT MOBILITY 1 Introduction The SLAM project, or Student Leadership Advancement Mobility project, started as collaboration between ENAS (European Network
More informationProgramme Specification
Programme Specification Title: Accounting and Finance Final Award: Master of Science (MSc) With Exit Awards at: Postgraduate Certificate (PG Cert) Postgraduate Diploma (PG Dip) Master of Science (MSc)
More information