The Area Review Process Webinar Question and Answer Session
|
|
- Melissa Kristina Joseph
- 6 years ago
- Views:
Transcription
1 The Area Review Process Webinar Question and Answer Session General questions What is the evidence base for this process? Evidence is set out in the Government s productivity plan, Fixing the Foundations creating a more prosperous nation and the overall objectives and context for the area review process are set out in the government policy document: Reviewing post-16 Education and Training Institutions. When should we expect our area review to kick off? Area reviews in Birmingham and Solihull, Greater Manchester, Sheffield City Region, Teesside, Solent and Sussex Coast have already been announced and we are in discussion with other areas which will be included alongside these areas within the early part of the programme. Further announcements about other areas will be made in due course. We expect all reviews to be completed by March You mentioned a map that is being developed of the areas for the reviews. When do you expect to have that work completed? We are currently in the process of mapping out and prioritising review areas and further information will be announced as these plans advance. When ready, the map will be available on the following website: We expect all reviews to be completed by March How will areas be defined in London? The local steering group will determine the area for the review. In respect of London, it is recognised that the number of colleges is significant and we are talking to the Greater London Authority about this and know they, together with London colleges, are already considering this issue. Is there an appeal process if colleges don t agree on their area? There will be no formal appeals process should a college not agree with the review area it has been included in, but an institution will have every opportunity to set out its concerns, and to contribute to other reviews where appropriate.
2 Why are these reviews being conducted at such a rapid pace? Surely a more measured risk based approach would be more effective and less open to error and poor decision making. The overall objectives and context for the area review process are set out in the Government policy document: 'Reviewing post-16 Education and Training Institutions '. It outlines the significant need and scope for greater efficiency in the sector, in a way that frees up resources to deliver high quality education and training which supports economic growth. The review timetable takes account of the lessons learnt from the pilots undertaken so far, which suggests that it is possible to undertake a thorough review in three or four months. Who actually initiates each area review? Reviews may either be proactively initiated by a group of institutions in a local area, or by Government where it sees a need to progress rapidly, in particular where there are concerns about some or much of the quality of the provision, capacity, or financial sustainability of individual institutions. Given the aspiration to move towards larger, more resilient and efficient providers: could you please identify the quantitative evidence base that demonstrates that larger providers are more resilient and efficient? Earlier this year we published a report from one of the further education advisers about new structures: Current Models of Collaboration. That confirmed that where the decision to change has been subject to rigorous assessment and careful implementation, larger institutions can create valuable economies of scale, protect and improve student access and progression, and address issues of poor quality. There is much good practice in the sector about how to ensure that these important features are realised, and a willing-ness by those visited and consulted during the course of this work to share their views and experiences with others. Could the following statement on page 14 of the guidance be clarified - "Separately, we are reviewing the criteria for the opening of new school sixth forms because of the risk of oversupply in various local areas." Is there another process going on? The Department for Education (DfE) is internally reviewing the criteria for the opening of new school sixth forms. We want the best schools to be able to increase choice and improve quality by opening sixth forms, and there are no plans to prevent any schools from applying to do so. 1
3 Has an Equality Impact Assessment been undertaken with regards the Government's policy on area reviews? If not, why not? A full impact assessment is being undertaken to understand the impact on students, employers, colleges and providers, local and national stakeholders and government. Each review will consider the impact on equality. The area review guidance makes clear that in considering options each local steering group should consider the impact on groups of students with protected characteristics in line with the requirements of the Equality Act Decisions on future provision will ultimately be made by individual providers and they will need to take account of the Public Sector Equality Duty as part of their deliberations. Having said the outcome is rationalisation, this is an expensive exercise to go into without targets. What is the BIS target for a smaller FE sector? The reviews are being conducted at minimal costs with both departments (BIS and DfE) and agencies (SFA and EFA) re-prioritising their existing resources to accommodate the additional work. There are no set targets. The reviews will serve a number of purposes as we set out in the guidance document in section 1. It is acknowledged that these reviews take place within a challenging financial context and, as a result, there may be a reduction in the size of the FE sector but this will not be clear until the all reviews are completed and recommendations agreed. Will there be an opportunity for a representative from colleges neighbouring the review area to attend the initial conference for governors? No. The initial conference is intended for the governors of colleges directly involved in the area review so that they have an early opportunity to hear about the purpose of the review and can help shape it. But colleges in neighbouring areas will have an opportunity to feed in their views. Why is an organisation being allowed to consult on the development of more post-16 provision PRIOR to the undertaking and completion of the post-16 area review? It is not absolutely clear what organisation is being referred to here. Area reviews are focused predominantly on FE and sixth form colleges in order to ensure there is a high quality and financially resilient set of colleges in each area. Alongside the analysis of educational and economic need, each review will conduct a comprehensive analysis of the current post-16 provision in an area. This will include the offer made by schools with sixth forms. This analysis will inform the development of options and 2
4 recommendations for the providers in scope of the review (which in the main will be colleges). However, we expect the analysis about the other providers not in scope to help in wider deliberations about the area that will be considered by the Regional Schools Commissioners and local authorities (who are both on the steering groups). Has ONS been consulted with regards its previous reclassification of colleges as private sector organisations? There is no intention to change the ONS status of colleges. Colleges are independent bodies and will make their own decisions. However, they are expected to act responsibly to consider the right structures that are financially sustainable, resilient and efficient, and deliver maximum value for public investment Has BIS calculated how much each area review will cost? The departments and their agencies will undertake this work with no additional staffing. Additional costs will be minimal. The departments and agencies have reprioritised from within existing resources to accommodate the additional work, including providing access to additional advice and support from FE advisers. In terms of implementation, we will expect colleges, LEPs and local authorities with relevant devolved skills budgets to provide funding and support to implement changes, particularly as we expect change to deliver significant net savings in the longer term. Government finance would need to be provided as a last resort. What role will DfE play in these reviews? DfE and BIS are jointly overseeing the area review process which will review the provision of post-16 education and training in England. The data analysis for reviews will cover all post-16 education and training but the focus for options analysis is primarily likely to be on FE colleges and sixth form colleges the latter for which the DfE has responsibility for funding and performance. Both departments and their agencies (SFA and EFA), alongside the FE and Sixth Form Commissioners, will sit on the National Steering Group, which is overseeing the area review process. 3
5 Who is involved in an area review Please can you justify the omission of sixth from provision in schools and UTCs in this area review process? Area reviews are focused predominantly on FE and sixth form colleges in order to ensure there is a high quality and financially resilient set of colleges in each area. Alongside the analysis of educational and economic need, each review will conduct a comprehensive analysis of the current post-16 provision in an area. This will include the offer made by schools with sixth forms. This analysis will inform the development of options and recommendations for the providers in scope of the review (which in the main will be colleges). However, we expect the analysis about the other providers not in scope to help in wider deliberations about the area that will be considered by the Regional Schools Commissioners and local authorities (who are both on the steering groups. Please can you explain the exclusion of principals in this review process and why it is felt appropriate to rely upon chairs and governing bodies to drive this initiative, all of whom are unpaid volunteers? Principals are not being excluded. They will be expected to attend steering groups and support their chair, subject to how local the steering group is organised and the size of the area. The steering group will be responsible for making strategic decisions in line with meeting the needs of the area rather than from an institutional focus and it is therefore appropriate for the formal membership to rest with the chair of the governing body recognising that it is the college corporation that is responsible for the college. Where does the student have a voice in this FE review process? The views of students are vital and understanding their views will be an essential element of every review. At our recent advisory group discussion, which involved members from colleges and the NUS, we agreed to look again at formalising the templates for ensuring this is done in a structured way. The National Union of Students has confirmed that it will support a mechanism to ensure that its members views are represented in the area review process. We will be working with them to make sure that they have the right information to enable them to secure informed feedback from their members. 4
6 How will the views of students, families and employers be sought? The reviews will actively engage with students, employers and wider communities to understand their views. The National Union of Students and the British Chamber of Commerce are members of the national area review advisory group helping to shape the process. We will be working with them to make sure that they have the right information to ensure their members can feed into the arrangements. Where the review recommends structural change such as merger or closure then the affected institutions will be required to consult with the local community upon those changes in line with existing statutory requirements. To what extent will the reviews consider the local offer for SEND in the local area? Reviews will need to take into account appropriate provision for 16 to 19-year-olds and adult students with special educational needs and disabilities (SEND). Local authorities will be represented on the local steering groups that will oversee the reviews and we expect them to be responsible for ensuring that students with additional needs are not disadvantaged by this process. What about rural areas and rural counties? The reviews will consider all levels of provision in their area and will make recommendations that reflect the needs of students to access education that meets their needs at every level and deliver the best outcomes for all students in their area. Each review will take account of the travel to learn patterns as they apply in the area, and this will be a consideration in the final recommendations. Ultimately the focus of the process is to deliver the best for students in their area, and travel patterns will form part of this. What happens in areas where there are multiple LEPs / overlapping LEPs? Which LEP takes the leading role on the steering group? Area reviews are not restricted to existing LEP boundaries. Each area review will be led by a local steering group, which will be chaired by either the FE Commissioner or the Sixth Form Commissioner or a representative from the combined or lead authority, where devolution arrangements are being put in place. It will comprise of a range of stakeholders from that area, including chairs of governors, the FE and Sixth Form Commissioners, local authorities, LEPs etc. The local steering group will oversee and 5
7 steer the review s work, and it will be for each individual steering group to decide which LEP should sit on the group and whether others need to be involved. Will colleges that cross area review boundaries become involved in a number of reviews? This could present a range of contentious options and create conflicts for such colleges and steering groups. Where a college is on the border of more than one review area, we would expect to see it formally take part in one review but its role taken into account by, and for it to be fully consulted about, other reviews that could also affect it. Institutions can and should be involved in reviews which will have an impact on local demand and supply of education and that will have an impact on their future. Many now have delivery models that span geographical boundaries and this will be taken into account, as they will be part of the solution to any review process. It is important that those institutions who recruit on a regional or national basis, but have a local presence are also considered. What happens when there is more than one tier of local authority i.e. county, borough and district and city deal area? Which has priority? We expect the relevant local authority with responsibility for strategic oversight of education to be involved in area reviews. It will be for the local steering group to decide which other bodies need to be invited to join to the group and those who will be will be consulted as part of the review process. How will specialist colleges such as land-based and art colleges be treated in these reviews. They often provide education and training for a regional and national audience? Colleges with a national recruitment profile will have an opportunity to participate in the area(s) in which they are situated, and will also have an opportunity to feed in to other reviews where they have a significant contribution to make to the solution for example where they recruit a significant number of students to further study and qualifications. What will stakeholder consultation look like? It is for each local steering group and the providers themselves to decide which providers should be in scope for the review. But all providers and stakeholders in an area will be consulted, using the existing networks that exist in many areas including those supported by AELP, Holex, the third sector national learning alliance, and HEFCE. 6
8 The joint delivery unit supporting each of the reviews will be putting place detailed stakeholder consultation arrangements. The reviews will be particularly keen to secure the views of students and employers throughout the process. How might universities, particularly those with a strong FE interest, be included in the reviews? The reviews are predominantly focused on FE and sixth form colleges in order to ensure there is a high quality and financially resilient set of colleges that will provide the future educational and economic need in each area. The review analysis will include offers made by schools with sixth forms, UTCs, independent providers and HEIs where appropriate to get the full scope of post-16 student needs for that area. There will be detailed stakeholder engagement arrangements put in place to enable all stakeholders to contribute to the reviews including universities. HEFCE is on the advisory group helping to inform the review process. What if one college in an area wants to proceed with a review and another resists engagement? All institutions have an interest and a responsibility, as publicly funded bodies, to engage with the process and take action to ensure that the offer in their area is of good quality and relevant to the needs of students and employers and that they are financially stable for the long term. Institutions will be strongly encouraged to participate in the process in their own long term interests, as well as the interests of students and employers. If institutions choose not to participate then they will miss an important opportunity to shape the future offer in their area, and the chance to contribute to that process on behalf of their students. A refusal to participate could be construed as actively obstructing the implementation of Government policy. Will the role of LEPs be looked at particularly where there appears to be significant overlap in geographies, which could potentially result in duplication of effort and inefficiencies? No. This is not in scope for the reviews. Not every area review will necessarily be based on LEP areas. It will be for the local steering group (comprised of the FE and Sixth Form Commissioners, the colleges, local authorities and LEP) to determine the appropriate area for the review, taking account of economic and educational needs and travel to learn patterns. 7
9 Area Review Process Who actually does the substantial analysis necessary and how is it funded? Each area review will be led by a local steering group, which will be chaired by either the FE Commissioner or the Sixth Form Commissioner or a representative from the combined or lead authority where there are devolved arrangements being put in place. The steering group will comprise of a range of stakeholders from within that area, including chairs of governors, the FE and Sixth Form Commissioners, local authorities, LEPs etc. The local steering group will oversee and steer the review s work, and it will be for each individual local steering group to decide whether to call on wider expertise if they feel it is required. The joint delivery unit, made up of the departments (BIS and DfE) and their agencies (SFA and EFA) will undertake this work, with support of the FE Commissioner and his expert advisers. Existing resources are being used to accommodate the additional work, including providing access to additional advice and support from FE Advisers. Colleges are autonomous institutions who will be taking their own viability into consideration to ensure they can provide a good service to students within financial constraints, so why can't a new delivery structure if needed be left to colleges themselves? We see the process running alongside the arrangements that colleges will already be making as to their future viability. All institutions have an interest and a responsibility, as publicly funded bodies, to engage with the process and take action to ensure that the offer in their area is of good quality and relevant to the needs of students and employers and that they are financially stable for the long term. Whilst it is appreciated that there is a need to improve higher level skills will there still be consideration of other skills needs e.g. anticipated growth of care sector? The reviews will look at all educational and economic skills needs of the area so every sector will be covered not just higher level skills. Can an area ask for an early review if there is an appetite for this? Yes, we are encouraging areas to be proactive in this. There is no fixed timetable for areas to start their reviews but they should all be completed by March The timing of reviews can be triggered by either the local area coming forward to propose a review or because a risk assessment by the FE Commissioner and Sixth Form College 8
10 Commissioner confirms that an early review is needed. If you and other partners in an area are interested in requesting a review for your area, it is recommended that you initially contact the area review mailbox at: Area.REVIEWS@education.gsi.gov.uk. If an area initiates its own review, who pays for the review? Whether a review is initiated locally or not, the joint delivery unit (comprised of resources from the departments and funding agencies) along with the expertise of the FE advisers will support the review. These costs are being met by government from reprioritising existing resources. We will expect colleges, LEPs and local authorities with relevant devolved skills budgets to provide funding and support to implement changes, particularly as we expect change to deliver significant net savings in the longer term. Government finance would need to be provided as a last resort. Will the area reviews take account of Ofsted ratings and judgements if the area is not covered on the college questionnaire? The area review team will collate detailed financial and quality information on each of the providers in scope in the area to establish the current position. This is normally data and information provided by the colleges as part of the routine of returns made to the funding agencies, or published data and information. This will include the latest Ofsted ratings. In addition, Ofsted has agreed to provide a summary report on all post 16 provision in an area, taking account of their inspections. The timescale to get a thorough discussion with governors is far too short and this will inevitably impact on informed decision making. Taking account of lessons learnt from the two pilot area reviews, the typical timescale we would expect would be three to four months. However, these timings could vary depending on the size and scope of each review. It is essential that this process is conducted at the right pace to achieve the best outcomes for all concerned. Will all members of local steering groups be expected to behave in accordance with Nolan Principles? Yes. We will encourage the Nolan principles to apply as with all government backed programmes. 9
11 One slide appears to imply that "other supporting organisations" will be on Local Steering Groups. Is that correct? Each area review will be led by a local steering group, which will be chaired by either the FE Commissioner or the Sixth Form Commissioner or a representative from the combined or lead authority, where devolution arrangements are being put in place. The local steering group will comprise of a range of stakeholders from within that area, including chairs of governors, the FE and Sixth Form Commissioners, local authorities, LEPs etc. It is for each local steering group and the providers themselves to decide which providers should be in scope for the review. If in scope, these providers will be considered as part of the options analysis and to consider the recommendations. But all providers in an area will be consulted, using the existing good networks that exist in many areas including those supported by AELP, Holex and the third sector national learning alliance. If there are different views within the Local Steering Group on how the boundaries should be set, how will these differences be resolved? Initially the area covered by each review will be decided by the National Steering Group at the review initiation stage. However, there is flexibility within the process, particularly once information is forthcoming from the review, and it will be up to the members of the local steering group to decide what the best option is for the students in that area. Please explain the reference to five steering groups. The five steering groups refer to the five meetings of the local steering group recommended in the model process for area review which is set out in the Area Review Guidance document. The number of meetings could however vary subject to local requirements. Will minutes of the local steering group meetings be published? If not, why not given that they will - presumably - be subject to FOI disclosure anyway. No. We will not publish minutes as they are closed meetings and members need to be free to discuss their business effectively. There will be a report published at the end of the review. 10
12 Will members of local steering groups be expected to declare any conflicts of interest? For example, local authorities in direct receipt of SFA funding for their own adult education units? Yes. Local steering groups will take in to account areas of potential conflict of interest as they are responsible for conducting the business of the area review in an appropriate way. Which stakeholder(s) has the ultimate authority if there is dispute over what should be included within an area and would there be an appeal process where there is disagreement? Individual area reviews will be overseen by a local steering group which will be led by an independent chairperson who will be the FE Commissioner, the Sixth Form Commissioner or the combined authority, where local devolution arrangements are being put in place. It will be for the steering group to resolve any disputes relating to their review and agree the best way forward to meet the current and future educational and economic needs of the area. There is no appeal process. After the review Is the government predicting that there will be fewer students? The reviews will take account of both current and future economic and educational needs including demographic changes. Options for each area will be considered taking account of this data consistently and there is no assumption that there will be fewer students in an area. If there are fewer colleges how will students be able to afford the travelling costs? Each review will take account of the travel to learn patterns as they apply in the area, and this will be a consideration in the final recommendations. Ultimately the focus of the process is to deliver the best for students in their area, and travel patterns will form part of this. 11
13 Will large colleges be broken up if it appears that the area's provision needs that to happen and what happens to the investment which will have been made in that provision at that college? Colleges are independent bodies and will make their own decisions. This will be an evidence based approach and it is impossible to confirm that this might not be a solution in some areas. Whatever happens, we expect colleges to act responsibly to consider the right structure to most effectively deliver for local areas and employers. Ultimately we would expect funding agencies and LEPs only to fund institutions that are taking action to ensure they can provide a good quality offer to students and employers, which is financially sustainable for the long term. Overall, we need to move towards fewer, larger, more resilient and efficient colleges. What is the rationale for Institutes of Technology, given the existence of extensive higher learning across FE colleges and the presence of UCTs? It seems to add another layer of provision at a time of spending constraints. As part of the area review process local areas will determine the need for an Institute of Technology. Once established we would expect Institutes of Technology will operate collaboratively and complement other providers, including FE and sixth form colleges, National Colleges and University Technical Colleges. One criteria in determining the institutional options available will be about the future needs of students and the underpinning analysis will, in each case, take account of the known demographic changes in future years. If the aim is to create prestigious Institutes of Technology what will happen to L1 and L2 students and those with special educational needs? The reviews will consider provision at all levels in an area and will make recommendations that reflect the needs of students - not just those studying at higher levels. The review analysis will consider the need for an Institute of Technology. Reviews will also take into account appropriate provision for year olds and adult students with Special Educational Needs and Disabilities (SEND) and ensure that students with additional needs are not disadvantaged by this process. Is it likely some existing colleges will become Institutes of Technology following the area review process? As part of the area review process local areas will determine the need for an institute of technology (IoT). Further information on IoTs is expected to be published shortly. Once established we would expect IoTs will operate collaboratively and complement other providers, including FE and sixth form colleges, national colleges and university technical colleges. 12
14 If a college takes steps on the basis of the review outcome and it does not work out as planned/something goes wrong, who will be liable for the consequences? We expect institutions to take the right action, in light of the findings of a review, to ensure that they are resilient and able to respond to future funding priorities. College governing bodies will be responsible for deciding whether to accept recommendations relating to their institutions and if recommendations are accepted, individual institutions will be responsible for implementing changes. They, therefore, will still remain liable (as they are now). How does this dovetail with the independence of institutions? Is there a chance that institutions may be overruled by the FE Commissioner or Area Based Review team? No. The local steering group will oversee and steer the area review process. The group will be comprise of a range of stakeholders from within that area, including chairs of governors, the FE and Sixth Form Commissioners, local authorities, LEPs etc. At the end of the review, they will put forward evidence based recommendations which each college s governing body will be responsible for deciding whether to accept or not and if recommendations are accepted, individual institutions will be responsible for implementing changes. Colleges will have the opportunity to challenge any of the recommendations before they sign up to them. Once a local outcome agreement is in place how will the period of structural change be funded? As soon as recommendations are agreed, it is important that they are implemented as soon as possible. Colleges should be aware that this may involve the need to employ a different skillset and resources in each individual review case. The funding agencies will undertake detailed monitoring of how implementation is going, and the national steering group will have oversight of progress. The local steering groups may also consider continuing to play a role in overseeing progress. Funding for the implementation work is expected to be provided by colleges, LEPs and local authorities with relevant devolved skills budgets, particularly as we expect that change will deliver significant net savings in the longer term. Government finance would need to be provided as a last resort. Rationalisation of back office functions and implementation of online systems require significant investment to achieve and set up.eg restructuring costs, software implementation costs, hardware costs, system. Where will the financial backing for merging? 13
15 We will expect colleges, LEPs and local authorities with relevant devolved skills budgets to provide funding and support to implement changes, particularly as we expect change to deliver significant net savings in the longer term. In addition the Education and Training Foundation and Jisc will support areas to learn from existing best practice including in the use of technology. Government finance would need to be provided as a last resort. Will the government look at the VAT position with regard to shared services to make it easier to share? We are aware of this issue and will be considering whether there is anything further that might be done to support shared services. How much money does Government expect will be saved as a result of the area review process? The aim of the reviews is to ensure the long term viability of the further education system, which is so essential to driving productivity. It is clear that the number of colleges facing financial issues is increasing whilst there is also significant potential for greater efficiency. The reviews provide an evidence based and structured approach to reforming the sector so that it is better able to meet the needs of students and employers and at the same time secure it long term financial viability. If a local outcome agreement determines that a course should be delivered in one location in a LEP and another college cease to deliver it, what will be done to prevent a school sixth form near to the second college from deciding to start that course? By allowing all stakeholders to have input into the process, and through the appointment of an independent chairperson, each review will be expected to arrive at evidence-based recommendations that all parties are able to sign up to. There is no intention to establish further reviews. However, it may be that the stakeholders involved in the process may see merit in reconvening in whole or part in the event of subsequent significant change in an area. We expect area reviews to provide the basis for ongoing collaboration in the area to maintain an effective post-16 offer, after the area process is complete. We also expect the Regional Schools Commissioner and the local authorities to take the findings of the review into account in their wider deliberations on schools provision. 14
16 15
PROPOSED MERGER - RESPONSE TO PUBLIC CONSULTATION
PROPOSED MERGER - RESPONSE TO PUBLIC CONSULTATION Paston Sixth Form College and City College Norwich Vision for the future of outstanding Post-16 Education in North East Norfolk Date of Issue: 22 September
More informationPost-16 transport to education and training. Statutory guidance for local authorities
Post-16 transport to education and training Statutory guidance for local authorities February 2014 Contents Summary 3 Key points 4 The policy landscape 4 Extent and coverage of the 16-18 transport duty
More informationTeacher of English. MPS/UPS Information for Applicants
Teacher of English MPS/UPS Information for Applicants Start date : Easter or September 2018 Weavers Academy Striving for success, focusing on learning Dear Applicant Thank you for showing an interest in
More informationAUTHORITATIVE SOURCES ADULT AND COMMUNITY LEARNING LEARNING PROGRAMMES
AUTHORITATIVE SOURCES ADULT AND COMMUNITY LEARNING LEARNING PROGRAMMES AUGUST 2001 Contents Sources 2 The White Paper Learning to Succeed 3 The Learning and Skills Council Prospectus 5 Post-16 Funding
More informationExclusions Policy. Policy reviewed: May 2016 Policy review date: May OAT Model Policy
Exclusions Policy Policy reviewed: May 2016 Policy review date: May 2018 OAT Model Policy 1 Contents Action to be invoked by Senior Staff in Serious Disciplinary Matters 1. When a serious incident occurs,
More informationTeaching Excellence Framework
Teaching Excellence Framework Role specification: Subject Pilot and Year Three Panel members and assessors 13 September 2017 Contents Background... 2 Introduction... 2 Application process... 3 Subject
More information5 Early years providers
5 Early years providers What this chapter covers This chapter explains the action early years providers should take to meet their duties in relation to identifying and supporting all children with special
More informationTHE QUEEN S SCHOOL Whole School Pay Policy
The Queen s Church of England Primary School Encouraging every child to reach their full potential, nurtured and supported in a Christian community which lives by the values of Love, Compassion and Respect.
More informationShort inspection of Maria Fidelis Roman Catholic Convent School FCJ
Ofsted Piccadilly Gate Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted 23 December 2016 Mrs Helen Gill Headteacher Maria Fidelis Roman Catholic Convent School FCJ 34 Phoenix Road London
More informationHigher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Kaplan International Colleges UK Ltd
Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Kaplan International Colleges UK Ltd June 2016 Contents About this review... 1 Key findings... 2 QAA's judgements about Kaplan International Colleges UK Ltd...
More informationHigher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd. Hertfordshire International College
Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd April 2016 Contents About this review... 1 Key findings... 2 QAA's judgements about... 2 Good practice... 2 Theme: Digital Literacies...
More informationHigher Education Review of University of Hertfordshire
Higher Education Review of University of Hertfordshire December 2015 Contents About this review... 1 Key findings... 2 QAA's judgements about the University of Hertfordshire... 2 Good practice... 2 Affirmation
More informationPUPIL PREMIUM POLICY
PUPIL PREMIUM POLICY 2017-2018 Reviewed September 2017 1 CONTENTS 1. OUR ACADEMY 2. THE PUPIL PREMIUM 3. PURPOSE OF THE PUPIL PREMIUM POLICY 4. HOW WE WILL MAKE DECISIONS REGARDING THE USE OF THE PUPIL
More informationGCSE English Language 2012 An investigation into the outcomes for candidates in Wales
GCSE English Language 2012 An investigation into the outcomes for candidates in Wales Qualifications and Learning Division 10 September 2012 GCSE English Language 2012 An investigation into the outcomes
More informationNavitas UK Holdings Ltd Embedded College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education
Navitas UK Holdings Ltd Embedded College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education February 2014 Annex: Birmingham City University International College Introduction
More informationInterim Review of the Public Engagement with Research Catalysts Programme 2012 to 2015
Interim Review of the Public Engagement with Research Catalysts Programme 2012 to 2015 A report for Research Councils UK March 2016 FULL REPORT Report author: Ruth Townsley, Independent Researcher Summary
More informationSt Philip Howard Catholic School
School report St Philip Howard Catholic School St Mary's Road, Glossop, SK13 8DR Inspection dates 4 November 1 December 2014 Overall effectiveness Previous inspection: Requires improvement 3 This inspection:
More information2007 No. xxxx EDUCATION, ENGLAND. The Further Education Teachers Qualifications (England) Regulations 2007
Please note: these Regulations are draft - they have been made but are still subject to Parliamentary Approval. They S T A T U T O R Y I N S T R U M E N T S 2007 No. xxxx EDUCATION, ENGLAND The Further
More informationSpecial Educational Needs and Disability (SEND) Policy
Special Educational Needs and Disability (SEND) Policy Policy Date: March 2017 Renewal Date: March 2018 Owner: Daniela Pinger, SENCO Special Educational Needs and Disability (SEND) Policy 1. Ethos and
More informationInitial teacher training in vocational subjects
Initial teacher training in vocational subjects This report looks at the quality of initial teacher training in vocational subjects. Based on visits to the 14 providers that undertake this training, it
More informationServices for Children and Young People
Services for Children and Young People Learning Difficulties and Disabilities Team TITLE: Services for Young People s Preparing for Adulthood Strategy for Young People with High Needs (14-25) PUBLICATION
More informationWoodlands Primary School. Policy for the Education of Children in Care
Woodlands Primary School Policy for the Education of Children in Care Written by Rita Tarrant-Blick Ratified by Governors Summer 2017 Date for Review Summer 2020 Signed Chair of Governors Signed Headteacher
More informationNewcastle Safeguarding Children and Adults Training Evaluation Framework April 2016
1 Newcastle Safeguarding Children and Adults Training Evaluation Framework April 2016 Context for the development and purpose of the framework The Learning and Development Committees for Newcastle Safeguarding
More informationUniversity of Essex Access Agreement
University of Essex Access Agreement Updated in August 2009 to include new tuition fee and bursary provision for 2010 entry 1. Context The University of Essex is academically a strong institution, with
More informationConsent for Further Education Colleges to Invest in Companies September 2011
Consent for Further Education Colleges to Invest in Companies September 2011 Of interest to college principals and finance directors as well as staff within the Skills Funding Agency. Summary This guidance
More informationStakeholder Engagement and Communication Plan (SECP)
Stakeholder Engagement and Communication Plan (SECP) Summary box REVIEW TITLE 3ie GRANT CODE AUTHORS (specify review team members who have completed this form) FOCAL POINT (specify primary contact for
More informationINTRODUCTION TO TEACHING GUIDE
GCSE REFORM INTRODUCTION TO TEACHING GUIDE February 2015 GCSE (9 1) History B: The Schools History Project Oxford Cambridge and RSA GCSE (9 1) HISTORY B Background GCSE History is being redeveloped for
More informationSpecial Educational Needs Policy (including Disability)
Special Educational Needs Policy (including Disability) To be reviewed annually Chair of Governors, Lyn Schlich Signed January 2017 East Preston Infant School SPECIAL EDUCATION NEEDS [SEN] POLICY CONTENTS
More informationSEN SUPPORT ACTION PLAN Page 1 of 13 Read Schools to include all settings where appropriate.
SEN SUPPORT ACTION PLAN -18 Page 1 of 13 Read Schools to include all settings where appropriate. The AIM of this action plan is that SEN children achieve their best possible outcomes. Target: to narrow
More informationI set out below my response to the Report s individual recommendations.
Written Response to the Enterprise and Business Committee s Report on Science, Technology, Engineering and Maths (STEM) Skills by the Minister for Education and Skills November 2014 I would like to set
More informationFair Measures. Newcastle University Job Grading Structure SUMMARY
Outline Level I Roles in this family are wholly or mainly focused on research and teaching. They may combine elements or research, teaching or management, but the relative emphasis on these elements and
More informationSpecial Educational Needs and Disabilities Policy Taverham and Drayton Cluster
Special Educational Needs and Disabilities Policy Taverham and Drayton Cluster Drayton Infant School Drayton CE Junior School Ghost Hill Infant School & Nursery Nightingale First School Taverham VC CE
More informationP920 Higher Nationals Recognition of Prior Learning
P920 Higher Nationals Recognition of Prior Learning 1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Peterborough Regional College is committed to ensuring the decision making process and outcomes for admitting students with prior
More informationTABLE OF CONTENTS. By-Law 1: The Faculty Council...3
FACULTY OF SOCIAL SCIENCES, University of Ottawa Faculty By-Laws (November 21, 2017) TABLE OF CONTENTS By-Law 1: The Faculty Council....3 1.1 Mandate... 3 1.2 Members... 3 1.3 Procedures for electing Faculty
More informationDICE - Final Report. Project Information Project Acronym DICE Project Title
DICE - Final Report Project Information Project Acronym DICE Project Title Digital Communication Enhancement Start Date November 2011 End Date July 2012 Lead Institution London School of Economics and
More informationMSc Education and Training for Development
MSc Education and Training for Development Awarding Institution: The University of Reading Teaching Institution: The University of Reading Faculty of Life Sciences Programme length: 6 month Postgraduate
More informationQualification Guidance
Qualification Guidance For awarding organisations Award in Education and Training (QCF) Updated May 2013 Contents Glossary... 2 Section 1 Introduction 1.1 Purpose of this document... 3 1.2 How to use this
More informationSpecial Educational Needs & Disabilities (SEND) Policy
Thamesmead School Special Educational Needs & Disabilities (SEND) Policy 2016-2017 Person Responsible Governors Committee Review Period P.Rodin Standards & Performance Annually Date of Review July 2016
More informationWOODBRIDGE HIGH SCHOOL
WOODBRIDGE HIGH SCHOOL EXAM POLICY 2017-2018 The 11-19 Exam Policy The purpose of this exam policy is: to ensure the planning and management of exams is conducted efficiently and in the best interest of
More informationPearson BTEC Level 3 Award in Education and Training
Pearson BTEC Level 3 Award in Education and Training Specification BTEC Specialist qualification First teaching September 2013 Issue 3 Edexcel, BTEC and LCCI qualifications Edexcel, BTEC and LCCI qualifications
More informationStudent Experience Strategy
2020 1 Contents Student Experience Strategy Introduction 3 Approach 5 Section 1: Valuing Our Students - our ambitions 6 Section 2: Opportunities - the catalyst for transformational change 9 Section 3:
More informationThis Access Agreement is for only, to align with the WPSA and in light of the Browne Review.
University of Essex Access Agreement 2011-12 The University of Essex Access Agreement has been updated in October 2010 to include new tuition fee and bursary provision for 2011 entry and account for the
More informationGeneral rules and guidelines for the PhD programme at the University of Copenhagen Adopted 3 November 2014
General rules and guidelines for the PhD programme at the University of Copenhagen Adopted 3 November 2014 Contents 1. Introduction 2 1.1 General rules 2 1.2 Objective and scope 2 1.3 Organisation of the
More informationProgramme Specification
Programme Specification Title: Accounting and Finance Final Award: Master of Science (MSc) With Exit Awards at: Postgraduate Certificate (PG Cert) Postgraduate Diploma (PG Dip) Master of Science (MSc)
More informationOasis Academy Coulsdon
School report Oasis Academy Coulsdon Homefield Road, Old Coulsdon, Croydon, CR5 1ES Inspection dates 4-5 March 2015 Overall effectiveness Previous inspection: Good 2 This inspection: Good 2 Leadership
More informationUniversity Library Collection Development and Management Policy
University Library Collection Development and Management Policy 2017-18 1 Executive Summary Anglia Ruskin University Library supports our University's strategic objectives by ensuring that students and
More informationArchdiocese of Birmingham
Archdiocese of Birmingham Section 48 Inspection SS MARY AND JOHN CATHOLIC PRIMARY SCHOOL Part of the Bishop Cleary Catholic Multi-Academy Company Caledonia Rd, Wolverhampton WV2 1HZ Inspection date 19
More informationNewlands Girls School
School report Newlands Girls School Farm Road, Maidenhead, Berkshire, SL6 5JB Inspection dates 02-03 October 2012 Overall effectiveness Previous inspection: Good 2 This inspection: Good 2 Achievement of
More informationBILD Physical Intervention Training Accreditation Scheme
BILD Physical Intervention Training Accreditation Scheme The BILD Physical Intervention Training Accreditation Scheme (PITAS) has long been seen as an indicator of quality and good practice for those providing
More informationLanguage learning in primary and secondary schools in England Findings from the 2012 Language Trends survey
Language learning in primary and secondary schools in England Research report Teresa Tinsley Kathryn Board OBE Welcome to CfBT Education Trust CfBT Education Trust is a top 30* UK charity providing education
More informationUniversity of Essex NOVEMBER Institutional audit
University of Essex NOVEMBER 2003 Institutional audit Published by Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education Southgate House Southgate Street Gloucester GL1 1UB Tel 01452 557000 Fax 01452 557070 Email
More informationPROGRAMME SPECIFICATION
PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION 1 Awarding Institution Newcastle University 2 Teaching Institution Newcastle University 3 Final Award M.Sc. 4 Programme Title Industrial and Commercial Biotechnology 5 UCAS/Programme
More informationQualification handbook
Qualification handbook BIIAB Level 3 Award in 601/5960/1 Version 1 April 2015 Table of Contents 1. About the BIIAB Level 3 Award in... 1 2. About this pack... 2 3. BIIAB Customer Service... 2 4. What are
More informationUSC VITERBI SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING
USC VITERBI SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING APPOINTMENTS, PROMOTIONS AND TENURE (APT) GUIDELINES Office of the Dean USC Viterbi School of Engineering OHE 200- MC 1450 Revised 2016 PREFACE This document serves as
More informationPERFORMING ARTS. Unit 2 Proposal for a commissioning brief Suite. Cambridge TECHNICALS LEVEL 3. L/507/6467 Guided learning hours: 60
2016 Suite Cambridge TECHNICALS LEVEL 3 PERFORMING ARTS Unit 2 Proposal for a commissioning brief L/507/6467 Guided learning hours: 60 Version 1 September 2015 ocr.org.uk/performingarts LEVEL 3 UNIT 2:
More informationReviewed December 2015 Next Review December 2017 SEN and Disabilities POLICY SEND
Reviewed December 2015 Next Review December 2017 SEN and Disabilities POLICY SEND Bewdley Primary School is committed to safeguarding and promoting the welfare of children and young people and expects
More informationPractice Learning Handbook
Southwest Regional Partnership 2 Step Up to Social Work University of the West of England Holistic Assessment of Practice Learning in Social Work Practice Learning Handbook Post Graduate Diploma in Social
More informationSt Matthew s RC High School
St Matthew s RC High School Teacher of Mathematics with TLR Application Pack - 1 - Appointment of Teacher of Mathematics The Governors are keen to invite applications from successful and enthusiastic qualified
More informationCURRICULUM PROCEDURES REFERENCE MANUAL. Section 3. Curriculum Program Application for Existing Program Titles (Procedures and Accountability Report)
CURRICULUM PROCEDURES REFERENCE MANUAL Section 3 Curriculum Program Application for Existing Program Titles (Procedures and Accountability Report) (Associate in Applied Science, Diploma, and Certificate
More informationChapter 2. University Committee Structure
Chapter 2 University Structure 2. UNIVERSITY COMMITTEE STRUCTURE This chapter provides details of the membership and terms of reference of Senate, the University s senior academic committee, and its Standing
More informationHARLOW COLLEGE FURTHER EDUCATION CORPORATION RESOURCES COMMITTEE. Minutes of the meeting held on Thursday 12 May 2016
HARLOW COLLEGE FURTHER EDUCATION CORPORATION RESOURCES COMMITTEE Minutes of the meeting held on Thursday 12 May 2016 Membership: * Denotes Present In attendance: *E Johnson (Chair) *J Bedford *J Breen
More informationAPPLICANT S INFORMATION PACK
APPLICANT S INFORMATION PACK C O N T E N T S 1. Letter from the Headteacher 2. Application and Selection process and timescales 3. Whalley Range 11-18 High School Profile 4. The Education and Leadership
More informationIMPACTFUL, QUANTIFIABLE AND TRANSFORMATIONAL?
IMPACTFUL, QUANTIFIABLE AND TRANSFORMATIONAL? EVALUATION OF THE IMPROVING QUALITY TOGETHER (IQT) NATIONAL LEARNING PROGRAMME Report for 1000 Lives Improvement Service, Public Health Wales Mark Llewellyn,
More informationIMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON ACCESS AGREEMENT
IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON ACCESS AGREEMENT BACKGROUND 1. This Access Agreement for Imperial College London is framed by the College s mission, our admissions requirements and our commitment to widening participation.
More informationto Club Development Guide.
Club Development Guide Welcome to the Welsh Triathlon Introduction to Club Development Guide. With the continued growth and popularity of Triathlon we wish to support your club and volunteers to ensure
More informationBusiness. Pearson BTEC Level 1 Introductory in. Specification
Pearson BTEC Level 1 Introductory in Business Specification Pearson BTEC Level 1 Introductory Certificate in Business Pearson BTEC Level 1 Introductory Diploma in Business Pearson BTEC Level 1 Introductory
More informationCARDIFF UNIVERSITY OF WALES UNITED KINGDOM. Christine Daniels 1. CONTEXT: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN WALES AND OTHER SYSTEMS
CARDIFF UNIVERSITY OF WALES UNITED KINGDOM Christine Daniels 1. CONTEXT: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN WALES AND OTHER SYSTEMS Cardiff is one of Britain s major universities, with its own Royal Charter and a history
More informationProviding Feedback to Learners. A useful aide memoire for mentors
Providing Feedback to Learners A useful aide memoire for mentors January 2013 Acknowledgments Our thanks go to academic and clinical colleagues who have helped to critique and add to this document and
More informationMINUTES OF THE GOVERNING BOARD OF SIR WILLIAM RAMSAY SCHOOL HELD AT THE SCHOOL ON WEDNESDAY 23 FEBRUARY 2017 AT 7.00 P.M.
SPRING TERM 2017 MINUTES OF THE GOVERNING BOARD OF SIR WILLIAM RAMSAY SCHOOL HELD AT THE SCHOOL ON WEDNESDAY 23 FEBRUARY 2017 AT 7.00 P.M. PRESENT: Mr Chris Carter (Acting Head) Prof James Knowles Mr Kieran
More informationProgramme Specification. BSc (Hons) RURAL LAND MANAGEMENT
Programme Specification BSc (Hons) RURAL LAND MANAGEMENT D GUIDE SEPTEMBER 2016 ROYAL AGRICULTURAL UNIVERSITY, CIRENCESTER PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION BSc (Hons) RURAL LAND MANAGEMENT NB The information contained
More informationIdsall External Examinations Policy
Idsall External Examinations Policy Sponsorship & Review 1 Sponsor Mr D Crichton, Deputy Headteacher 2 Written and Approved October 2014 3 Next Review Date October 2016 This policy should be read in conjunction
More informationPersonal Tutoring at Staffordshire University
Personal Tutoring at Staffordshire University Staff Guidelines 1 Contents Introduction 3 Staff Development for Personal Tutors 3 Roles and responsibilities of personal tutors 3 Frequency of meetings 4
More informationRCPCH MMC Cohort Study (Part 4) March 2016
RCPCH MMC Cohort Study (Part 4) March 2016 Acknowledgements Dr Simon Clark, Officer for Workforce Planning, RCPCH Dr Carol Ewing, Vice President Health Services, RCPCH Dr Daniel Lumsden, Former Chair,
More informationInstitutional review. University of Wales, Newport. November 2010
Institutional review University of Wales, Newport November 2010 The Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education 2011 ISBN 978 1 84979 260 8 All QAA's publications are available on our website www.qaa.ac.uk
More informationEastbury Primary School
Eastbury Primary School Dawson Avenue, Barking, IG11 9QQ Inspection dates 26 27 September 2012 Overall effectiveness Previous inspection: Satisfactory 3 This inspection: Requires improvement 3 Achievement
More informationThis Access Agreement covers all relevant University provision delivered on-campus or in our UK partner institutions.
UNIVERSITY OF HERTFORDSHIRE ACCESS AGREEMENT 2011/12 1 Overview The University of Hertfordshire has a strong track record of success in raising aspirations and thus in widening participation. This is amply
More informationPractice Learning Handbook
Southwest Regional Partnership 2 Step Up to Social Work University of the West of England Holistic Assessment of Practice Learning in Social Work Practice Learning Handbook Post Graduate Diploma in Social
More informationCurriculum Policy. November Independent Boarding and Day School for Boys and Girls. Royal Hospital School. ISI reference.
Curriculum Policy Independent Boarding and Day School for Boys and Girls Royal Hospital School November 2017 ISI reference Key author Reviewing body Approval body Approval frequency 2a Director of Curriculum,
More informationExam Centre Contingency and Adverse Effects Policy
Exam Centre Contingency and Adverse Effects Policy Contents 1. Aims of the Joint Contingency Plan 2. Communications 3. Background and ownership 4. Disruption of teaching time centre is closed for an extended
More informationPlanning a research project
Planning a research project Gelling L (2015) Planning a research project. Nursing Standard. 29, 28, 44-48. Date of submission: February 4 2014; date of acceptance: October 23 2014. Abstract The planning
More informationBriefing document CII Continuing Professional Development (CPD) scheme.
Briefing document CII Continuing Professional Development (CPD) scheme www.thepfs.org 2 Contents 3 What is Continuing Professional Development > 4 Who needs to complete the CII CPD scheme > 5 What does
More informationSchool Complaints Policy
Mrs Bland s Infant and Nursery School : Procedure Document Name of Policy: Status: Links to other policies: School Complaints Procedure Recommended other School Complaints Policy Content: Committee responsible
More information2015 Annual Report to the School Community
2015 Annual Report to the School Community Narre Warren South P-12 College School Number: 8839 Name of School Principal: Rob Duncan Name of School Council President: Greg Bailey Date of Endorsement: 23/03/2016
More informationÉcole Jeannine Manuel Bedford Square, Bloomsbury, London WC1B 3DN
School report École Jeannine Manuel 43 45 Bedford Square, Bloomsbury, London WC1B 3DN Inspection dates 13 15 December 2016 Overall effectiveness Effectiveness of leadership and management Quality of teaching,
More informationPAPILLON HOUSE SCHOOL Making a difference for children with autism. Job Description. Supervised by: Band 7 Speech and Language Therapist
PAPILLON HOUSE SCHOOL Making a difference for children with autism Job Description Post Title: Speech and Language Therapist Band / Grade: Band 6 equivalent Hours: Full time / Part time Location: Papillon
More informationArchdiocese of Birmingham
Archdiocese of Birmingham INSPECTION REPORT THE GIFFARD CATHOLIC PRIMARY SCHOOL WOLVERHAMPTON Inspection dates 25 th -26 th June 2013 Reporting Inspector Paul Nutt Inspection carried out under Section
More informationThis Access Agreement is for only, to align with the WPSA and in light of the Browne Review.
University of Essex Access Agreement 2011-12 The University of Essex Access Agreement has been updated in October 2010 to include new tuition fee and bursary provision for 2011 entry and account for the
More informationSOAS Student Disciplinary Procedure 2016/17
SOAS Student Disciplinary Procedure 2016/17 1 Introduction and general principles 1.1 Persons registering as students of SOAS become members of the School and as such commit themselves to abiding by its
More informationProgramme Specification
Programme Specification Awarding Body/Institution Teaching Institution Queen Mary, University of London Queen Mary, University of London Name of Final Award and Programme Title MSc Accounting and Finance
More informationJAM & JUSTICE. Co-producing Urban Governance for Social Innovation
JAM & JUSTICE Co-producing Urban Governance for Social Innovation An info-sheet introducing the Jam and Justice project and outlining how you can get involved. For more info, contact us: ontheplatform.org.uk/jam-justice
More informationDirector, Intelligent Mobility Design Centre
ROYAL COLLEGE OF ART ROLE DESCRIPTION Post: Department: Senior Research Fellow Intelligent Mobility Design Centre Grade: 10 Responsible to: Director, Intelligent Mobility Design Centre Background The Royal
More informationInformation Pack: Exams Officer. Abbey College Cambridge
Information Pack: Exams Officer 1 To be a community energized by a love of learning and the pursuit of outstanding achievement for all Each individual student achieves excellence by achieving significant
More informationPolitics and Society Curriculum Specification
Leaving Certificate Politics and Society Curriculum Specification Ordinary and Higher Level 1 September 2015 2 Contents Senior cycle 5 The experience of senior cycle 6 Politics and Society 9 Introduction
More informationAssociate Professor of Electrical Power Systems Engineering (CAE17/06RA) School of Creative Arts and Engineering / Engineering
Job Description General Details Job title: School/Department Normal Workbase: Tenure: Hours/FT: Grade/Salary: Associate Professor of lectrical Power Systems ngineering (CA17/06RA) School of Creative Arts
More informationUnit 7 Data analysis and design
2016 Suite Cambridge TECHNICALS LEVEL 3 IT Unit 7 Data analysis and design A/507/5007 Guided learning hours: 60 Version 2 - revised May 2016 *changes indicated by black vertical line ocr.org.uk/it LEVEL
More informationUsing research in your school and your teaching Research-engaged professional practice TPLF06
Using research in your school and your teaching Research-engaged professional practice TPLF06 What is research-engaged professional practice? The great educationalist Lawrence Stenhouse defined research
More informationCode of Practice on Freedom of Speech
Code of Practice on Freedom of Speech Rev Date Purpose of Issue / Description of Change Equality Impact Assessment Completed 1. October 2011 Initial Issue 2. 8 th June 2015 Revision version 2 28 th July
More informationRecognition of Prior Learning (RPL) Procedure - Higher Education
Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) Procedure - Higher Education Version: 6.4 Effective Date: 5 August 2016 Procedure Code: PR-030 Related Policy Code: ACA-001 Related Policy Name: Educational Pathways
More informationResearcher Development Assessment A: Knowledge and intellectual abilities
Researcher Development Assessment A: Knowledge and intellectual abilities Domain A: Knowledge and intellectual abilities This domain relates to the knowledge and intellectual abilities needed to be able
More information