Pradhan Mantri Awaas Yojana - Gramin. Performance Review Committee 17th November, 2017

Transcription

1 Pradhan Mantri Awaas Yojana - Gramin Performance Review Committee 17th November, 2017

2 Pradhan Mantri Awaas Yojana- Gramin (PMAY-G)

3 Expectation from States/UTs Timeline By November 2017 Target Milestones (Houses in Lakhs) Sanction 60 Completion 10 By December 2017 Sanction 75 Completion 15 By January 2018 Completion 25 By February 2018 Completion 35 By March 2018 Completion 51 Rural Mason Training Target - 95,000 Trained Rural Masons by March, 2018

4 15.70% 99.29% 98.85% 98.02% 94.30% 92.51% 91.30% 91.18% 90.98% 83.54% 78.27% 74.64% 67.03% 62.15% 60.92% 55.95% 55.02% 52.11% 48.22% 47.50% 45.53% 38.33% 33.83% 33.40% 28.29% 26.53% Physical Progress-Sanction of Houses Against Target* *Status as on Nov 15, 2017

5 Sanction of Houses Against Target- Performance of States/UTs North East States Manipur, Tripura, Sikkim, Assam are performing satisfactorily with respect to sanctioning of houses. Mizoram, Arunachal Pradesh, and Nagaland are required to speed up the process of sanctioning. Union Territories Dadra and Nagar Haveli has picked up. Other UTs such as Andaman and Nicobar, Lakshadweep, Daman and Diu are required to expedite the process of registration and sanctioning. Other States Chhattisgarh, West Bengal, Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Uttar Pradesh, Gujarat are the top performing states Performance of states such as Jammu and Kashmir, Haryana, Kerala, Bihar, Punjab, Goa has remained poor with regard to sanctioning of houses.

6 MADHYA PRADESH C H H ATTISGARH H IMACHAL PRADESH ODISHA WEST B ENGAL JHARKHAND MAHARASHTRA K ERALA K A R N A T AKA R AJASTHAN A N DHRA PRADESH H ARYANA UTTARAKHAND ASSAM G UJARAT MIZORAM SIKKIM T AMIL N ADU UTTAR PRADESH T R IPURA B IHAR A R UNACHAL PRADESH G OA JAMMU AND K A SHMIR MANIPUR MEGHALAYA N A G A LAND PUNJAB A N DAMAN AND N ICOBAR DADRA & NAGAR H A V E LI DAMAN AND DIU L AKSHADWEEP T E LANGANA 28.97% 21.22% 19.69% 12.28% 10.42% 10.33% 9.09% 8.43% 5.42% 4.93% 4.10% 1.58% 0.70% 0.46% 0.32% 0.31% 0.31% 0.28% 0.23% 0.02% 41.82% Physical Progress-Completion of Houses Against Target* North East States and Union Territories: Poor performance with regard to completion Other States: Madhya Pradesh and Chhattisgarh are the top performing states. Uttar Pradesh, Gujarat, Tamil Nadu, Bihar, Uttarakhand, Punjab, Jammu & Kashmir, Goa have to catch up. *Status as on Nov 15, 2017

7 Financial Progress Central Releases Release of State Matching Share Second Installment for FY 16-17: Released to Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Orissa, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal, Madhya Pradesh First Installment for FY 17-18: Released to Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh, Rajasthan and West Bengal States are required to submit proposals for availing 2nd installment for FY and Fully Released: Gujarat, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Maharashtra, Sikkim, Uttarakhand, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka Partially Released Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Madhya Pradesh, Meghalaya, Odisha, Rajasthan, Tripura, Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal Not released - Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Bihar, Goa, Jammu & Kashmir, Kerala, Manipur, Mizoram, Nagaland, Punjab, Tamil Nadu, Telangana

8 DADRA & NAGAR HAVELI ASSAM RAJASTHAN MADHYA PRADESH CHHATTISGARH TAMIL NADU BIHAR WEST BENGAL SIKKIM KERALA KARNATAKA TRIPURA JHARKHAND UTTAR PRADESH ODISHA MAHARASHTRA GUJARAT MEGHALAYA JAMMU AND KASHMIR NAGALAND HARYANA HIMACHAL PRADESH MIZORAM PUNJAB MANIPUR ANDHRA PRADESH UTTARAKHAND ARUNACHAL PRADESH GOA ANDAMAN AND NICOBAR DAMAN & DIU LAKSHADWEEP TELANGANA Finalisation and Uploading of PWL on AwaasSoft..1/ Less than 60% % of GPs where PWL has been uploaded

9 Finalisation and Uploading of PWL on AwaasSoft..2/2 States/UTs lagging behind in finalisation and uploading of PWL on AwaaasSoft* Himachal Pradesh Uttarakhand Goa Manipur Mizoram Punjab Andaman & Nicobar Lakshadweep Arunachal Pradesh Daman & Diu Telangana States to upload list of households recommended for inclusion in PWL by Appellate Committee on AwaasSoft. As on 30 th October, 2017, 16,54,462 more households have been recommended for inclusion in the PWL *States where out of the total number of GPs, PWL has been finalized and uploaded on AwaasSoft for less than 60% GPs only.

10 Status: Policy Matters PMU Set Up Setting up of PMU Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Bihar, Chhattisgarh, Haryana, Jharkhand, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Punjab, Odisha, Sikkim, Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand, Andhra Pradesh, Telangana PMU Set Up Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Jammu and Kashmir, Rajasthan, West Bengal, Dadra and Nagar Haveli, Daman and Diu House Design Typologies Demonstration houses have been constructed in Tripura, Sikkim and Maharashtra Additional design typologies have been developed by Gujarat, Arunachal Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Punjab & Tamil Nadu.

11 Demonstration Houses in Tripura

12 Rural Mason Training Rural Mason Training Status Chhattisgarh (Top Performing) 1744 trainees Certified West Bengal 330 trainees certified Jharkhand 103 Certified Madhya Pradesh Extensive ToT undergoing Gujarat & Dadra & Nagar Haveli TPs empanelled, Target decided & Training to be started Remaining States are requested to start Rural Mason Training on priority Benefits of Rural Mason Training: Availability of Skilled Masons Five trainees construct one House House completed in 45 Days Good quality of construction of Houses Way Forward Rural Mason Training needs to be started on priority basis by States/Uts Identification of houses and candidates for training Training Providers to be engaged Training to be given as per the Rural Mason Training Guideline of MoRD

13 Validation of Qualification Pack (QP)- Rural Mason Training Difficult to achieve the competencies of NSQF level 4 in rural context Development of QPs for RMT at lower levels of NSQF Assistant Rural Mason NSQF Level 2 Helper Rural Mason NSQF Level 1 The lower level QPs will be helpful for States/UTs in training & RPL QPs have been shared with States/UTs earlier (Hyperlink) Validation of the QPs by States/UTs is needed Validation letter is circulated for the approval of States/UTs

14 Photographs of Rural Mason Training Brick Masonry Leveling of Shuttering Placing of reinforcement steel Assessment

15 Weekly Verification of Photos uploaded on AwaasSoft 20 States Checked 74 Districts Checked 2326 Houses Checked 384 Cases where incomplete houses considered as completed Major Issues identified Incomplete houses Missing building elements viz. doors, windows, roof, lintel band, plaster, paint No Toilet No PMAY-G logo on completed house

16 Some of the identified cases where incomplete house is considered as completed..1/2 Beneficiary ID: OR District: Baleshwar, Odisha Beneficiary ID: UP District: Azamgarh, Uttar Pradesh Beneficiary ID: TN District: Ariyular, Tamil Nadu Beneficiary ID: WB District: Siliguri, West Bengal

17 Some of the identified cases where incomplete house is considered as completed..2/2 Beneficiary ID: CH District: Bijapur, Chhattisgarh Beneficiary ID: GJ District: Batod, Gujarat Beneficiary ID: MP District: Alirajpur, M. P. Beneficiary ID: RJ District: Jalore, Rajasthan

18 Status on Mission Antyodaya Items Figure As on September 24, 2017 No. of GPs under Mission Antyodaya 50,108* No. of GPS for which PWL has not been uploaded on AwaasSoft Total no. of eligible beneficiaries under Mission Antyodaya (A) Total no. of sanctions to the beneficiaries of GPs under Mission Antyodaya (B) GAP = Eligible Beneficiaries - Sanctions (A-B) * Data not available for 450 GPs 9,400 55,03,197 11,38,987 43,64,210 States are advised to saturate the Mission Antyodaya Gram Panchayats on priority basis

19 Performance Index For ranking of states/uts based on performance against predefined parameters Proposed Parameters Gram Sabha resolutions uploaded against total number of GPs PWL uploaded on AwaasSoft against total number of GPs No. of 1 st installments paid against MoRD Target No. of 2 nd installments paid against MoRD Target Aadhar Seeding out of MoRD Target Houses Sanctioned against Target Houses Completed against Target

20 Way Forward PM s Awards for Excellence in Public Administration 422 districts have registered themselves under PMAY States/UTs to ensure that the districts with good performance records participate in the competition Celebration of Awaas Diwas To be celebrated every year on 20 th November States/UTs to take up activities to sensitize the beneficiaries about PMAY-G and issue suitable directions to the districts and furnish a report on activities undertaken to MoRD Submission of Best Practices/Success Stories States to provide HD photos, success stories and best practices about PMAY-G on regular basis

21 Indira Awaas Yojana (IAY)

22 Status of Physical and Financial Progress- IAY Status of Completion of IAY Houses sanctioned prior to and updation on AwaasSoft North East States Union Territories Other States Assam, Tripura, Meghalaya, Mizoram, have shown good performance in completing the IAY houses which were sanctioned prior to All Union Territories need to upload physical completion on AwaasSoft Chhattisgarh, Kerala, West Bengal, Uttar Pradesh, Tamil Nadu, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Odisha, Uttarakhand, Andhra Pradesh, Karnataka, Telangana are among the top performing states Financial Status: Special Projects Proposal for release of second installments / settlements of accounts for Special Projects awaited from following States: Jammu and Kashmir, Madhya Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Odisha, Andhra Pradesh and Tamil Nadu

23 THANK YOU