Program Learning Outcomes. Curriculum Mapping Assessment Methods Use of Assessment Data

Similar documents
Saint Louis University Program Assessment Plan. Program Learning Outcomes Curriculum Mapping Assessment Methods Use of Assessment Data

Learning Objectives by Course Matrix Objectives Course # Course Name Psyc Know ledge

- COURSE DESCRIPTIONS - (*From Online Graduate Catalog )

ABET Criteria for Accrediting Computer Science Programs

ACTIVITY INSIGHT FOR COLLEGE OF ARTS & SCIENCES FACULTY

DEPARTMENT OF EARLY CHILDHOOD, SPECIAL EDUCATION, and REHABILITATION COUNSELING. DOCTORAL PROGRAM Ph.D.

Interdisciplinary Ph.D. in Education Sciences College of Education, University of Kentucky

Kinesiology. Master of Science in Kinesiology. Doctor of Philosophy in Kinesiology. Admission Criteria. Admission Criteria.

The College of Law Mission Statement

PSYC 620, Section 001: Traineeship in School Psychology Fall 2016

ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES WITHIN ACADEMIC PROGRAMS AT WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY

Procedures for Academic Program Review. Office of Institutional Effectiveness, Academic Planning and Review

Standards and Criteria for Demonstrating Excellence in BACCALAUREATE/GRADUATE DEGREE PROGRAMS

School of Education and Health Sciences

Barstow Community College NON-INSTRUCTIONAL

eportfolio Guide Missouri State University

I. Proposal presentations should follow Degree Quality Assessment Board (DQAB) format.

Policy for Hiring, Evaluation, and Promotion of Full-time, Ranked, Non-Regular Faculty Department of Philosophy

National Survey of Student Engagement Executive Snapshot 2010

GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION

B. Outcome Reporting Include the following information for each outcome assessed this year:

ANNUAL CURRICULUM REVIEW PROCESS for the 2016/2017 Academic Year

STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT

The completed proposal should be forwarded to the Chief Instructional Officer and the Academic Senate.

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT

TABLE OF CONTENTS. By-Law 1: The Faculty Council...3

8. Prerequisites, corequisites (If applicable) Prerequisites: ACCTG 1 (Financial Accounting) ACCTG 168 (Tax Accounting)

Student Learning Outcomes: A new model of assessment

Curricular Reviews: Harvard, Yale & Princeton. DUE Meeting

TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES SUBTITLE A: EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION SUBCHAPTER b: PERSONNEL PART 25 CERTIFICATION

2010 National Survey of Student Engagement University Report

Master of Science (MS) in Education with a specialization in. Leadership in Educational Administration

GRADUATE STUDENT HANDBOOK Master of Science Programs in Biostatistics

Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011)

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN POLITICAL SCIENCE

Introduction: SOCIOLOGY AND PHILOSOPHY

ITM2500 Spreadsheet & Database Productivity. Spreadsheet & Database Productivity

ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY PROPOSAL TO ESTABLISH A NEW GRADUATE DEGREE

European Association of Establishments for Veterinary Education. and the Federation of Veterinarians of Europe

Revision and Assessment Plan for the Neumann University Core Experience

University of Oregon College of Education School Psychology Program Internship Handbook

San Diego State University Division of Undergraduate Studies Sustainability Center Sustainability Center Assistant Position Description

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE)

Tentative School Practicum/Internship Guide Subject to Change

Mathematics Program Assessment Plan

World s Best Workforce Plan

Requirements for the Degree: Bachelor of Science in Education in Early Childhood Special Education (P-5)

PROGRAM REQUIREMENTS FOR RESIDENCY EDUCATION IN DEVELOPMENTAL-BEHAVIORAL PEDIATRICS

Strategic Planning for Retaining Women in Undergraduate Computing

Developing an Assessment Plan to Learn About Student Learning

University Assessment Council Minutes Erickson Board Room September 12, 2016 Louis Slimak

John Jay College of Criminal Justice, CUNY ASSESSMENT REPORT: SPRING Undergraduate Public Administration Major

HIGHLAND HIGH SCHOOL CREDIT FLEXIBILITY PLAN

December 1966 Edition. The Birth of the Program

MASTER OF EDUCATION (M.ED), MAJOR IN PHYSICAL EDUCATION

Colorado State University Department of Construction Management. Assessment Results and Action Plans

Midterm Evaluation of Student Teachers

Comprehensive Program Review Report (Narrative) College of the Sequoias

Case of the Department of Biomedical Engineering at the Lebanese. International University

Programme Specification. BSc (Hons) RURAL LAND MANAGEMENT

Cultivating an Enriched Campus Community

NIH Ruth L. Kirschstein National Research Service Awards for Individual Predoctoral Fellows (Parent F31)

ACCREDITATION STANDARDS

The Characteristics of Programs of Information

CÉGEP HERITAGE COLLEGE POLICY #15

SECTION 1: SOLES General Information FACULTY & PERSONNEL HANDBOOK

Arlington Public Schools

Department of Social Work Master of Social Work Program

Student Assessment Policy: Education and Counselling

American Studies Ph.D. Timeline and Requirements

College of Science Promotion & Tenure Guidelines For Use with MU-BOG AA-26 and AA-28 (April 2014) Revised 8 September 2017

Evaluation Off Off On On

M.S. in Environmental Science Graduate Program Handbook. Department of Biology, Geology, and Environmental Science

USF Course Change Proposal Global Citizens Project

PREPARING FOR THE SITE VISIT IN YOUR FUTURE

HANDBOOK. Doctoral Program in Educational Leadership. Texas A&M University Corpus Christi College of Education and Human Development

National Survey of Student Engagement The College Student Report

Goal #1 Promote Excellence and Expand Current Graduate and Undergraduate Programs within CHHS

*Questions related to the program s accredited status should be directed to the Commission on Accreditation.

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

UNIVERSIDAD DEL ESTE Vicerrectoría Académica Vicerrectoría Asociada de Assessment Escuela de Ciencias y Tecnología

Linguistics Program Outcomes Assessment 2012

Office of Institutional Effectiveness 2012 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) DIVERSITY ANALYSIS BY CLASS LEVEL AND GENDER VISION

Graduate Student Grievance Procedures

Curriculum Assessment Employing the Continuous Quality Improvement Model in Post-Certification Graduate Athletic Training Education Programs

Assessment for Student Learning: Institutional-level Assessment Board of Trustees Meeting, August 23, 2016

Appendix. Journal Title Times Peer Review Qualitative Referenced Authority* Quantitative Studies

Department of Geography Bachelor of Arts in Geography Plan for Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes The University of New Mexico

A Systems Approach to Principal and Teacher Effectiveness From Pivot Learning Partners

CI at a Glance. ttp://

Ministry Audit Form 2016

University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences Programmatic Evaluation Plan

Mayo School of Health Sciences. Clinical Pastoral Education Internship. Rochester, Minnesota.

University of Toronto

SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Process and Reports

BYLAWS of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan

Followed by a 30 minute session for those interested in school social work placements and specialization

Strategic Plan SJI Strategic Plan 2016.indd 1 4/14/16 9:43 AM

Loyola University Maryland Center for Montessori Education

MASTER OF ARTS IN APPLIED SOCIOLOGY. Thesis Option

Transcription:

Saint Louis University Program Assessment Plan Program (Major, Minor, Core): Masters LD, ID, BD, Special Education Department: Educational Studies College/School: School of Education Person(s) Responsible for Implementing the Plan: Nikki Murdick, Ph.D.; Joseph Nichols, Ph.D. Date Submitted: February 26, 2016 Program Learning Outcomes What do you expect all students who complete the program to know, or be able to do? Students will explain special education learning and curriculum theories. Curriculum Mapping Assessment Methods Use of Assessment Data Where is the outcome learned/assessed (courses, internships, student teaching, clinical, etc.)? EDF 6100 Studies in Educational Philosophy. EDI 6450 Curriculum Development. EDI 6230 Seminar in Instruction. EDF 5300 Advanced Educational Psychology. How do students demonstrate their performance of the program learning outcomes? How does the program measure student performance? Distinguish your direct measures from indirect measures. Direct questions about special education learning and curriculum theories. Indirect questions that require the student to use special education learning and curriculum theories to as part of their answer. an issue in special How does the program use assessment results to recognize success and "close the loop" to inform additional program improvement? How/when is this data shared, and with whom? Students will research questions in the field of special EDR 5600 General Research Methods for Educators. EDR 5100 Introduction to Inferential Statistics: Students are required to answer questions about the research in and thinking behind their theme paper. 1

EDR 5400 Introduction to Qualitative Research. an issue in special education. Students will analyze social justice issues in EDSP 4600 Medical Implications in Special EDSP 5530 Fundamentals in Neurology EDSP 5600 Seminar: Special Education EDSP 5610, 5620, or 5630 Seminar: Intellectual Disability, Learning Disabilities, or Behavioral Disorders Students are required to use their knowledge of special education learning and curriculum theories to answer analysis questions about social justice related issues in an issue in special Students will explain how special education learning and curriculum theories are used to develop education programs. EDSP 526 Practicum in Special Education At least 3 hours of coursework related to their field (e.g. EDSP 5450 Adv counseling in Special Ed; EDSP 5610, 5620, or 5630 Seminar: Intellectual Disability, Learning Disabilities, or Behavioral Disorders; EDSP 5550 Adv Assessment Procedures in Special Ed). Students are required to answer questions about how special education learning and curriculum theories are used to develop education programs. an issue in special education curriculum and instruction. Students will use oral and written communication. and oral exam. EDSP 5950 Special Study for Exams. EDSP 5CR Master s Degree Study. Program faculty evaluate how effectively students communicate their knowledge about special education curriculum, instruction, and learning. an issue in special 2

1. It is not recommended to try and assess (in depth) all of the program learning outcomes every semester. It is best practice to plan out when each outcome will be assessed and focus on 1 or 2 each semester/academic year. Describe the responsibilities, timeline, and the process for implementing this assessment plan. The School of Education collects and analyzes data on its graduate teacher education learning outcomes every year. The data from these assessment measures are collected from September 1-August 31. This data is summarized and uploaded into the School of Education s data dashboard on a semester or yearly basis The faculty review the data on these outcomes on a yearly basis in the fall semester. The review and reporting process for this assessment plan is monitored by the School of Education s assessment committee. Specifically, the Director of Graduate Teacher Education and the Director of Assessment are responsible for making sure this plan is implemented and that data-based program improvement decisions are made and used by faculty. 2. Please explain how these assessment efforts are coordinated with Madrid (courses and/or program)? This question is not applicable to this assessment plan. 3. The program assessment plan should be developed and approved by all faculty in the department. In addition, the program assessment plan should be developed to include student input and external sources (e.g., national standards, advisory boards, employers, alumni, etc.). Describe the process through which your academic unit created this assessment plan. Include the following: a. Timeline regarding when or how often this plan will be reviewed and revised. (This could be aligned with program review.) This assessment plan is reviewed in accordance with the School of Education s accreditation and program review cycle. The School of Education s assessment committee is responsible for reviewing and making changes to this assessment plan. The Director of Assessment is responsible for making sure the assessment committee monitors and reviews this plan at the appropriate time. b. How students were included in the process and/or how student input was gathered and incorporated into the assessment plan. The Director of Graduate Teacher Education consults and facilitates discussions with students about the programs in graduate teacher education and manages program changes as necessary. 3

c. What external sources were consulted in the development of this assessment plan? The following external sources were consulted when making this plan: Saint Louis University s assessment planning materials and learning outcomes. d. Assessment of the manageability of the plan in relation to departmental resources and personnel. The School of Education has the departmental resources and personnel to manage this plan. We have a full-time Director of Assessment as well as an assessment governing committee. 4

Saint Louis University Program Assessment Plan Program (Major, Minor, Core): Masters Early childhood special education Department: Educational Studies College/School: School of Education Person(s) Responsible for Implementing the Plan: Nikki Murdick, Ph.D.; Joseph Nichols, Ph.D. Date Submitted: February 26, 2016 Program Learning Outcomes What do you expect all students who complete the program to know, or be able to do? Students will explain early childhood special education learning and curriculum theories. Curriculum Mapping Assessment Methods Use of Assessment Data Where is the outcome learned/assessed (courses, internships, student teaching, clinical, etc.)? EDF 6100 Studies in Educational Philosophy. EDI 6450 Curriculum Development. EDI 6230 Seminar in Instruction. EDF 5300 Advanced Ed Psychology. How do students demonstrate their performance of the program learning outcomes? How does the program measure student performance? Distinguish your direct measures from indirect measures. Direct questions about early childhood special education learning and curriculum theories. Indirect questions that require the student to use early childhood special education learning and curriculum theories to as part of their answer. How does the program use assessment results to recognize success and "close the loop" to inform additional program improvement? How/when is this data shared, and with whom? Students will research questions in the field of curriculum and instruction. EDR 5600 General Research Methods for Educators. Students are required to answer questions about the research in and thinking behind their theme paper. 1

EDR 5100 Introduction to Inferential Statistics: EDR 5400 Introduction to Qualitative Research. Students will analyze social justice issues in Students will explain how learning and curriculum theories are used to develop education programs. EDSP 5640 Seminar: Early Childhood Special EDSP 4600 Medical Implications in Special EDSP 5530 Fundamentals of Neurology. At least 8 hours of coursework related to their field (e.g. EDSP 5450 Adv counseling in Special Ed; EDSP 5610, 5620, or 5630 Seminar: Intellectual Disability, Learning Disabilities, or Behavioral Disorders; EDSP 5550 Adv Assessment Procedures in Special Ed). Students are required to use their knowledge of early childhood special education learning and curriculum theories to answer analysis questions about social justice related issues in Students are required to answer questions about how early childhood special education learning and curriculum theories are used to develop education programs. Students will use oral and written communication. and oral exam. EDSP 5950 Special Study for Exams. EDSP 5CR Master s Degree Study. Program faculty evaluate how effectively students communicate their knowledge about curriculum, instruction, and learning. 2

1. It is not recommended to try and assess (in depth) all of the program learning outcomes every semester. It is best practice to plan out when each outcome will be assessed and focus on 1 or 2 each semester/academic year. Describe the responsibilities, timeline, and the process for implementing this assessment plan. The School of Education collects and analyzes data on its graduate teacher education learning outcomes every year. The data from these assessment measures are collected from September 1-August 31. This data is summarized and uploaded into the School of Education s data dashboard on a semester or yearly basis The faculty review the data on these outcomes on a yearly basis in the fall semester. The review and reporting process for this assessment plan is monitored by the School of Education s assessment committee. Specifically, the Director of Graduate Teacher Education and the Director of Assessment are responsible for making sure this plan is implemented and that data-based program improvement decisions are made and used by faculty. 2. Please explain how these assessment efforts are coordinated with Madrid (courses and/or program)? This question is not applicable to this assessment plan. 3. The program assessment plan should be developed and approved by all faculty in the department. In addition, the program assessment plan should be developed to include student input and external sources (e.g., national standards, advisory boards, employers, alumni, etc.). Describe the process through which your academic unit created this assessment plan. Include the following: a. Timeline regarding when or how often this plan will be reviewed and revised. (This could be aligned with program review.) This assessment plan is reviewed in accordance with the School of Education s accreditation and program review cycle. The School of Education s assessment committee is responsible for reviewing and making changes to this assessment plan. The Director of Assessment is responsible for making sure the assessment committee monitors and reviews this plan at the appropriate time. b. How students were included in the process and/or how student input was gathered and incorporated into the assessment plan. The Director of Graduate Teacher Education consults and facilitates discussions with students about the programs in graduate teacher education and manages program changes as necessary. 3

c. What external sources were consulted in the development of this assessment plan? The following external sources were consulted when making this plan: Saint Louis University s assessment planning materials and learning outcomes. d. Assessment of the manageability of the plan in relation to departmental resources and personnel. The School of Education has the departmental resources and personnel to manage this plan. We have a full-time Director of Assessment as well as an assessment governing committee. 4