INTRODUCTION TO PRAGMATICS. Week 1 Sessions /22 & 08/24

Similar documents
Intra-talker Variation: Audience Design Factors Affecting Lexical Selections

Derivational: Inflectional: In a fit of rage the soldiers attacked them both that week, but lost the fight.

Proof Theory for Syntacticians

English Language and Applied Linguistics. Module Descriptions 2017/18

Objectives. Chapter 2: The Representation of Knowledge. Expert Systems: Principles and Programming, Fourth Edition

ENGBG1 ENGBL1 Campus Linguistics. Meeting 2. Chapter 7 (Morphology) and chapter 9 (Syntax) Pia Sundqvist

Think A F R I C A when assessing speaking. C.E.F.R. Oral Assessment Criteria. Think A F R I C A - 1 -

A Minimalist Approach to Code-Switching. In the field of linguistics, the topic of bilingualism is a broad one. There are many

The College Board Redesigned SAT Grade 12

The Bulgarian Reportative as a Conventional Implicature Chronos 10. Dimka Atanassov University of Pennsylvania

Rule-based Expert Systems

The Effect of Discourse Markers on the Speaking Production of EFL Students. Iman Moradimanesh

Construction Grammar. University of Jena.

Critical Thinking in the Workplace. for City of Tallahassee Gabrielle K. Gabrielli, Ph.D.

Review in ICAME Journal, Volume 38, 2014, DOI: /icame

Relevance Theory and the saying/implicating distinction *

Specification and Evaluation of Machine Translation Toy Systems - Criteria for laboratory assignments

Compositional Semantics

- «Crede Experto:,,,». 2 (09) ( '36

L1 and L2 acquisition. Holger Diessel

Writing a composition

ALER Association of Literacy Educators and Researchers Charlotte, North Carolina November 5-8, 2009

Assessing speaking skills:. a workshop for teacher development. Ben Knight

Transitive meanings for intransitive verbs

Literature and the Language Arts Experiencing Literature

Possessive have and (have) got in New Zealand English Heidi Quinn, University of Canterbury, New Zealand

Instructor: Mario D. Garrett, Ph.D. Phone: Office: Hepner Hall (HH) 100

A DISSERTATION SUBMITTED TO THE FACULTY OF THE GRADUATE SCHOOL OF THE UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA BY. Kaitlin Rose Johnson

TAG QUESTIONS" Department of Language and Literature - University of Birmingham

Control and Boundedness

Anticipation Guide William Faulkner s As I Lay Dying 2000 Modern Library Edition

Mock Trial Preparation In-Class Assignment to Prepare Direct and Cross Examination Roles 25 September 2015 DIRECT EXAMINATION

Handbook for Graduate Students in TESL and Applied Linguistics Programs

LQVSumm: A Corpus of Linguistic Quality Violations in Multi-Document Summarization

AN INTRODUCTION (2 ND ED.) (LONDON, BLOOMSBURY ACADEMIC PP. VI, 282)

NAME: East Carolina University PSYC Developmental Psychology Dr. Eppler & Dr. Ironsmith

FUZZY EXPERT. Dr. Kasim M. Al-Aubidy. Philadelphia University. Computer Eng. Dept February 2002 University of Damascus-Syria

FOREWORD.. 5 THE PROPER RUSSIAN PRONUNCIATION. 8. УРОК (Unit) УРОК (Unit) УРОК (Unit) УРОК (Unit) 4 80.

Unit 8 Pronoun References

PHILOSOPHY & CULTURE Syllabus

Reading Comprehension Lesson Plan

LEXICAL COHESION ANALYSIS OF THE ARTICLE WHAT IS A GOOD RESEARCH PROJECT? BY BRIAN PALTRIDGE A JOURNAL ARTICLE

CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

Interdisciplinary Research - Challenges and Opportunities for Actuarial Profession. Aldona Skučaitė, lecturer Vilnius university

Campus Academic Resource Program An Object of a Preposition: A Prepositional Phrase: noun adjective

Replies to Greco and Turner

Evolution of Collective Commitment during Teamwork

CS 598 Natural Language Processing

What is Research? A Reconstruction from 15 Snapshots. Charlie Van Loan

A Correlation of. Grade 6, Arizona s College and Career Ready Standards English Language Arts and Literacy

Segmented Discourse Representation Theory. Dynamic Semantics with Discourse Structure

Declarative Questions

Controlled vocabulary

Assessing Entailer with a Corpus of Natural Language From an Intelligent Tutoring System

PREP S SPEAKER LISTENER TECHNIQUE COACHING MANUAL

Does Linguistic Communication Rest on Inference?

Causal Link Semantics for Narrative Planning Using Numeric Fluents

Lesson Overview: This lesson will introduce what a possessive pronoun is by reviewing

Master Program: Strategic Management. Master s Thesis a roadmap to success. Innsbruck University School of Management

Monsters and the theoretical role of context

MEASURING ORDINARY MEANING USING SURVEYS JP SEVILLA 3L and Levy Fellow George Mason University School of Law September 10, 2014

Realization of Textual Cohesion and Coherence in Business Letters through Presupposition 1

The BE + -ING form: Progressive aspect and metonymy

Informatics 2A: Language Complexity and the. Inf2A: Chomsky Hierarchy

Contents. Foreword... 5

Focusing bound pronouns

COSI Meet the Majors Fall 17. Prof. Mitch Cherniack Undergraduate Advising Head (UAH), COSI Fall '17: Instructor COSI 29a

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT If sub mission ins not a book, cite appropriate location(s))

Merbouh Zouaoui. Melouk Mohamed. Journal of Educational and Social Research MCSER Publishing, Rome-Italy. 1. Introduction

Procedural pragmatics and the study of discourse Louis de Saussure

Types and Lexical Semantics

The Short Essay: Week 6

CollaboFramework. Framework and Methodologies for Collaborative Research in Digital Humanities. DHN Workshop. Organizers:

How to Use Vocabulary Maps to Deliver Explicit Vocabulary Instruction: A Guide for Teachers

Describing Motion Events in Adult L2 Spanish Narratives

Mandarin Lexical Tone Recognition: The Gating Paradigm

Word Sense Disambiguation

Constraining X-Bar: Theta Theory

LIMITED COMMON GROUND, UNLIMITED COMMUNICATIVE SUCCESS: AN EXPERIMENTAL STUDY INTO LINGUA RECEPTIVA USING ESTONIAN AND RUSSIAN

Evaluating Statements About Probability

Developing Grammar in Context

Mental Models and the Meaning of Connectives: A Study on Children, Adolescents and Adults

Instruction: The Differences That Make A Difference. Mario Campanaro

Part I. Figuring out how English works

ANGLAIS LANGUE SECONDE

Lecture 2: Quantifiers and Approximation

What Structures Are Underlying Structures?

Oakland Unified School District English/ Language Arts Course Syllabus

Intension, Attitude, and Tense Annotation in a High-Fidelity Semantic Representation

Understanding Language

Explaining: a central discourse function in instruction. Christiane Dalton-Puffer University of Vienna

Context-Sensitive Bidirectional OT: a New Approach to Russian Aspect

Candidates must achieve a grade of at least C2 level in each examination in order to achieve the overall qualification at C2 Level.

Curriculum Design Project with Virtual Manipulatives. Gwenanne Salkind. George Mason University EDCI 856. Dr. Patricia Moyer-Packenham

Derivational and Inflectional Morphemes in Pak-Pak Language

Toward a New Theory of Metaphorical Interpretation

Reflective problem solving skills are essential for learning, but it is not my job to teach them

Teaching Task Rewrite. Teaching Task: Rewrite the Teaching Task: What is the theme of the poem Mother to Son?

What s in Your Communication Toolbox? COMMUNICATION TOOLBOX. verse clinical scenarios to bolster clinical outcomes: 1

Program Matrix - Reading English 6-12 (DOE Code 398) University of Florida. Reading

Transcription:

INTRODUCTION TO PRAGMATICS Week 1 Sessions 1.1 + 1.2 08/22 & 08/24

HOUSEKEEPING Syllabus In groups, discuss : Name, background, interest for this class, interest in general in linguistics, something special about yourself. Questions?

INTRODUCTION

WHAT IS PRAGMATICS? 2 types of meaning: literal/at-issue/proffered/lexically encoded meaning (semantics) intended/non-at-issue/inferred meaning (pragmatics) Pragmatics = the study of language use in context. Semantics = the study of meaning independent of context.

PRAGMATIC MEANING What features does pragmatic meaning have? non-literal: Can you think of an example? My day was a nightmare. context-dependent: This clause has five words. This one has four. inferential an/or not truth-conditional: It s really hot in here! (=> Open the windows/ Turn on the a/c.) Does inferential meaning counts as part of the truth of a sentence?

PRAGMATICS VS. OTHER FIELDS Language use involves a relationship between form and meaning. Pragmatics vs. Discourse Analysis? Pragmatics D.A: Uses discourse as data and seeks to draw generalizations that have predictive power concerning our linguistic competence. What happens in discourse? Focuses on the individual discourse, using the findings of pragmatic theory to shed light on how a particular set of interlocutors use and interpret language in a specific context. What's happening in this discourse?

METHODOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS What type of data is used in pragmatics research? Native-speaker intuitions (own, informant) Psycholinguistic experimentation Naturally occurring data (corpus, elicitation, natural observation) More on how to conduct empirical research at the end of the course.

BOUNDARY BETWEEN SEMANTICS & PRAGMATICS

1. THE DOMAIN OF SEMANTICS Word-level meaning Ø Synonymy, antonymy, hyponymy, homonymy, vagueness, polysemy. Ø Componential analysis (primitive features), fuzzy set theory (prototypes). Sentence-level meaning Ø Compositional semantics. Ø Redundancy, paraphrase, anomaly, ambiguity.

WORD MEANING: COMPONENTIAL SEMANTICS WITH PRIMITIVE FEATURES Give an example of some words that are easily analyzable with primitive features. Boy (+ male, - adult) Limitations? many new features needed, not easy to identify relevant features for all lexical items. Real-world example: 2006 MA judge Burrito is not a sandwich. Alternative: Fuzzy-set theory with prototypes as central member.

SENTENCE MEANING Refers to those aspects of meaning ascribed to a sentence in the abstract (i.e. independent of its realization in any concrete form) Compositional semantics: sum of its parts + rules governing the way in which the meaning of the sentence is built. Redundancy, paraphrase, anomaly, ambiguity.

FORMAL LOGIC Tautology: sentence true in all possible worlds. Contradiction: sentence false in all possible worlds. Analytic sentence: truth of sentence is independent of what the world is like. Synthetic sentence: truth of sentence is dependent on conditions of what the world is like.

BASIC NOTIONS #1: SENTENCE, UTTERANCE & PROPOSITION What is a sentence? A sequence of words. Sentence meaning = literal meaning of words. What is an utterance? A sentence produced in some actual context. (Pairing of sentence + context) Utterance/Speaker-meaning = definable as what a speaker intends to convey by making an utterance. What is a proposition? What the sentence expresses. Propositional context = that part of its meaning that can be reduced to a proposition.

BASIC NOTIONS #1: SENTENCE, UTTERANCE & PROPOSITION A declarative sentence, when uttered to make a statement, is said to convey a proposition. Propositions may be true or false, may be known, believed, denied, held constant under translations. The same proposition can be expressed by different sentences: Ben bought a car A car was bought by Ben.

BASIC NOTIONS #1: SENTENCE, UTTERANCE & PROPOSITION Natural language utterances can convey more than one proposition: Context: Carlos pocket was picked at the party he is attending with Mario. Carlos: Who stole my money? Mario: That man, my mother s friend, stole your money. What propositions are conveyed by Mario s utterance? 1. Somebody stole my money 2. The person is a man 3. Carlos had money 4. The man indicated stole Carlos money 5. Mario has a mother 6. The man indicated is Mario s mother s friend. (from Tonhauser, 2012) Propositions conveyed often differ in their primacy!

RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SENTENCE, UTTERANCE AND PROPOSITION Proposition Sentence Sentence Utterance Utterance A proposition (being the most abstract of the 3 notions) can be expressed by different sentences. A given sentence, being the next most abstract notion, can itself be instantiated by different utterances, the least abstract notion of all.

BASIC NOTIONS #2: TRUTH-CONDITIONS, TRUTH VALUE & ENTAILMENT Truth-value: context in which a proposition is true or false. Truth-condition: conditions under which a sentence is true, which is independent of what the world actually is like. Snow is white is true if and only if snow is actually white. S is true iff p. Truth-conditional meaning: any piece of meaning that affects the conditions under which a sentence would be true. 1. Only John 1 voted for John 1. 2. Only John 1 voted for himself 1. Assuming that John was not the only person who voted, do these sentences share the same truth-conditions?

BASIC NOTIONS #2: TRUTH-CONDITIONS, TRUTH VALUE & ENTAILMENT Entailment A proposition (or sentence expressing a proposition) p entails a proposition (or sentence expressing a proposition) q iff the truth of p guarantees the truth of q. Strong kind of implication, which is semantic in nature. Examples: Sue and Fred went to the party = Sue went to the party JFK was assassinated = JFK is dead.

2. THE DOMAIN OF PRAGMATICS Non-natural meaning = no automatic, natural correlation between the word/sentence and its meaning. Sense vs. referent. Unlike sense, it s possible for reference to vary in different contexts. Utterance/Speaker-meaning = defined as what a speaker intends to convey by making an utterance. I m cold è speaker can intend to convey different messages.

MUTUAL BELIEFS Needed in order for the intentions of interlocutors to be relevant and go through, leading to successful communication. Comprehenders must recognize speakers intentions for successful communication to happen. Pop quiz example p.27 (Birner) Lifeguard example p.3 (Green) Belief is what makes the difference between a lie and a mistake, or between informing and reminding.

PLANS AND ACTS Task of the discourse-interpreter/comprehender is to: understand what the speaker has said, i.e. to construct a mental model of the situation which the speaker is indicating exists, evaluate that model and use it to update his own model of the world. How does the conduit metaphor (Reddy, 1979) provide a misleading view of linguistic communication? What properties of language support the blueprint metaphor of the toolmakers paradigm?

SOME BOUNDARY PHENOMENA Anaphoric pronouns Challenges the assumption that there is no context-dependent input into truth conditions. Conventional implicatures Aspect of meaning that are context-independent but not truthconditional. Example of but in Birner p.33/34.

SUMMARY

In general, the dividing line between semantics & pragmatics can be drawn on the basis of context-dependence or truth-conditional status, but not both. Overarching question: Which definition is the most helpful definition of pragmatics?

EXERCISES

ENTAILMENTS For each pair of sentences below, please indicate whether the sentence in (A) entails that in (B): 1 A. Susan is always complaining. B. Susan is often complaining. 2 A. It s raining. B. It s cold. 3 A. Some of my friends got promoted. B. Not all of my friends got promoted. 4 A. Henry and Jane are married. B. Henry and Jane are married to each other. 5 A. Everyone likes an apple. B. Everyone likes a piece of fruit.

ENTAILMENTS For each pair of sentences below, please indicate whether the sentence in (A) entails that in (B): 1 A. Susan is always complaining. B. Susan is often complaining. 2 A. It s raining. B. It s cold. 3 A. Some of my friends got promoted. B. Not all of my friends got promoted. 4 A. Henry and Jane are married. B. Henry and Jane are married to each other. 5 A. Everyone likes an apple. B. Everyone likes a piece of fruit.

BASIC NOTIONS Answer the following questions with a partner: What are the differences, if any, between utterances and sentences? Why is context so important in pragmatics? Complete the following exercises in Birner: 5 p.36, 6 p.37, 12. & 15 p.38.