Data Alert February 17, 2012

Similar documents
Average Loan or Lease Term. Average

46 Children s Defense Fund

medicaid and the How will the Medicaid Expansion for Adults Impact Eligibility and Coverage? Key Findings in Brief

2017 National Clean Water Law Seminar and Water Enforcement Workshop Continuing Legal Education (CLE) Credits. States

Wilma Rudolph Student Athlete Achievement Award

STATE CAPITAL SPENDING ON PK 12 SCHOOL FACILITIES NORTH CAROLINA

BUILDING CAPACITY FOR COLLEGE AND CAREER READINESS: LESSONS LEARNED FROM NAEP ITEM ANALYSES. Council of the Great City Schools

FY year and 3-year Cohort Default Rates by State and Level and Control of Institution

Two Million K-12 Teachers Are Now Corralled Into Unions. And 1.3 Million Are Forced to Pay Union Dues, as Well as Accept Union Monopoly Bargaining

Disciplinary action: special education and autism IDEA laws, zero tolerance in schools, and disciplinary action

Housekeeping. Questions

A Profile of Top Performers on the Uniform CPA Exam

cover Private Public Schools America s Michael J. Petrilli and Janie Scull

CLE/MCLE Information by State

NASWA SURVEY ON PELL GRANTS AND APPROVED TRAINING FOR UI SUMMARY AND STATE-BY-STATE RESULTS

State Limits on Contributions to Candidates Election Cycle Updated June 27, PAC Candidate Contributions

Discussion Papers. Assessing the New Federalism. State General Assistance Programs An Urban Institute Program to Assess Changing Social Policies

The following tables contain data that are derived mainly

Free Fall. By: John Rogers, Melanie Bertrand, Rhoda Freelon, Sophie Fanelli. March 2011

The Effect of Income on Educational Attainment: Evidence from State Earned Income Tax Credit Expansions

2014 Comprehensive Survey of Lawyer Assistance Programs

Understanding University Funding

Fisk University FACT BOOK. Office of Institutional Assessment and Research

Proficiency Illusion

Set t i n g Sa i l on a N e w Cou rse

2016 Match List. Residency Program Distribution by Specialty. Anesthesiology. Barnes-Jewish Hospital, St. Louis MO

ObamaCare Expansion Enrollment is Shattering Projections

Trends in Tuition at Idaho s Public Colleges and Universities: Critical Context for the State s Education Goals

2013 donorcentrics Annual Report on Higher Education Alumni Giving

A Comparison of the ERP Offerings of AACSB Accredited Universities Belonging to SAPUA

Stetson University College of Law Class of 2012 Summary Report

STATE-BY-STATE ANALYSIS OF CONTINUING EDUCATION REQUIREMENTS FOR LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTS

Imagine this: Sylvia and Steve are seventh-graders

Student Admissions, Outcomes, and Other Data

NCSC Alternate Assessments and Instructional Materials Based on Common Core State Standards

The College of New Jersey Department of Chemistry. Overview- 2009

top of report Note: Survey result percentages are always out of the total number of people who participated in the survey.

The Value of English Proficiency to the. By Amber Schwartz and Don Soifer December 2012

NBCC NEWSNOTES. Guidelines for the New. World of WebCounseling. Been There, Done That: Multicultural Training Can. Always be productively revisted

2007 NIRSA Salary Census Compiled by the National Intramural-Recreational Sports Association NIRSA National Center, Corvallis, Oregon

VOL VISION 2020 STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION

History of CTB in Adult Education Assessment

San Francisco County Weekly Wages

The number of involuntary part-time workers,

Financial Education and the Credit Behavior of Young Adults

Teacher Supply and Demand in the State of Wyoming

TRENDS IN. College Pricing

National Survey of Student Engagement Spring University of Kansas. Executive Summary

About the College Board. College Board Advocacy & Policy Center

2009 National Survey of Student Engagement. Oklahoma State University

Trends in Higher Education Series. Trends in College Pricing 2016

EDUCATION POLICY ANALYSIS ARCHIVES A peer-reviewed scholarly journal

Peer Comparison of Graduate Data

The Ohio State University Library System Improvement Request,

Strategic Plan Update, Physics Department May 2010

Why Science Standards are Important to a Strong Science Curriculum and How States Measure Up

LEWIS M. SIMES AS TEACHER Bertel M. Sparks*

2014 Journalism Graduate Skills for the Professional Workplace: Expectations from Journalism Professionals and Educators

Use of CIM in AEP Enterprise Architecture. Randy Lowe Director, Enterprise Architecture October 24, 2012

Emergency Safety Interventions Kansas Regulations and Comparisons to Other States. April 16, 2013

2017 Police Field Guide

CC Baccalaureate. Kevin Ballinger Dean Consumer & Health Sciences. Joe Poshek Dean Visual & Performing Arts/Library

The Demographic Wave: Rethinking Hispanic AP Trends

Welcome. Paulo Goes Dean, Eller College of Management Welcome Our region

Produced by the Feminist Majority Foundation s Campus Leadership Program East Coast: 1600 Wilson Blvd Suite 801, Arlington, VA

Junior (61-90 semester hours or quarter hours) Two-year Colleges Number of Students Tested at Each Institution July 2008 through June 2013

THE ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL IMPACT OF APPRENTICESHIP PROGRAMS

Susanna M Donaldson Curriculum Vitae

PHYSICIAN PRACTICE MANAGEMENT BOOT CAMP DIRECTORY

Teach For America alumni 37,000+ Alumni working full-time in education or with low-income communities 86%

National FFA Collegiate Scholarships Catalog

OSU Access Week at Puebla, Mexico

Innovation Village: Building Tradition

Teaching Colorado s Heritage with Digital Sources Case Overview

Albert (Yan) Wang. Flow-induced Trading Pressure and Corporate Investment (with Xiaoxia Lou), Forthcoming at

Pathways to Health Professions of the Future

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Arkansas Private Option Medicaid expansion is putting state taxpayers on the hook for millions in cost overruns

Building a Grad Nation

2012 ACT RESULTS BACKGROUND

Ken Cyree, Ph.D. Dean of the Business School Frank R. Day/Mississippi Bankers Association Chair Professor of Finance

Graduate Division Annual Report Key Findings

2014 JOURNALISM GRADUATE SKILLS FOR THE PROFESSIONAL WORKPLACE: EXPECTATIONS FROM JOURNALISM PROFESSIONALS AND EDUCATORS

Higher Education. Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education. November 3, 2017

WASHINGTON Does your school know where you are? In class? On the bus? Paying for lunch in the cafeteria?

December 1966 Edition. The Birth of the Program

Suggested Citation: Institute for Research on Higher Education. (2016). College Affordability Diagnosis: Maine. Philadelphia, PA: Institute for

Like much of the country, Detroit suffered significant job losses during the Great Recession.

The Implementation of a Consecutive Giving Recognition Program at the University of Florida

Wisconsin 4 th Grade Reading Results on the 2015 National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP)

The Social Network of US Academic Anthropology Nicholas C. Kawa (co-authors: Chris McCarty, José A. Clavijo Michelangeli, and Jessica Clark)

EITAN GOLDMAN Associate Professor of Finance FedEx Faculty Fellow Indiana University

1.0 INTRODUCTION. The purpose of the Florida school district performance review is to identify ways that a designated school district can:

UTILITY POLE ATTACHMENTS Understanding New FCC Regulations and Industry Trends

Enrollment Trends. Past, Present, and. Future. Presentation Topics. NCCC enrollment down from peak levels

Higher Education Six-Year Plans

Reaching the Hispanic Market The Arbonne Hispanic Initiative

Texas Healthcare & Bioscience Institute

JOB OUTLOOK 2018 NOVEMBER 2017 FREE TO NACE MEMBERS $52.00 NONMEMBER PRICE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES AND EMPLOYERS

NCTE Early Career Educator of Color Leadership Awards. NCTE Advancement of People of Color Leadership Award. NCTE Distinguished Service Award

Transcription:

Data Alert February 17, 2012 For Immediate Release Contact: Heather Trela (518) 443-5831 State & Local Government Jobs Continue to Decline in Most States By Lucy Dadayan ALBANY, N.Y. ---- Recent data from the Bureau of Labor Statistics continue to show broad declines in state and local government employment in a majority of states, although public-sector jobs have increased elsewhere. This Data Alert examines recent changes in state and local government employment at the individual state level, as well as the national level, using several recent periods for comparison. Using three-month employment averages to smooth short-term variations, total U.S. nonfarm employment rose by 1.4 percent over the year ending in January 2012. The growth was driven by a 2.0 increase in the private sector (+2.1 million jobs). By contrast, all the subsectors of government reported declines in employment over the year. As shown on Table 1, federal government employment declined by 1.2 percent (-35,000 jobs), state government employment by 1.5 percent (-76,000 jobs) and local government employment by 1.1 percent (-163,000 jobs). Employment Sector Table 1: Change in Employment By Sector November-January moving average Employment (thousands) Nov 2010 to Jan 2011 Nov 2011 to Jan 2012 Period ending Jan 2012 vs. period ending Jan 2011 Change %change Total nonfarm 130,343 132,179 1,837 1.4% Total private 108,081 110,191 2,110 2.0% Government 22,262 21,988 (274) -1.2% Federal 2,870 2,834 (35) -1.2% State and local government 19,392 19,153 (238) -1.2% State government 5,129 5,054 (76) -1.5% State government education 2,386 2,381 (5) -0.2% State government, excluding education 2,744 2,673 (71) -2.6% Local government 14,263 14,100 (163) -1.1% Local government education 7,953 7,852 (102) -1.3% Local government, excluding education 6,309 6,248 (61) -1.0% Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics, Current Employment Statistics Figure 1 compares recent employment trends in the private sector with those in state and local governments. (Except where otherwise noted, references to local government employment in this report include school districts.) Private employment fell far more sharply than government employment during and immediately after the recession, reaching a trough of 7.6 percent below its recent peak roughly two years after the downturn officially began in December 2007. The decline in private sector employment remains nearly twice as large as that in the combined total for state and local governments. Overall private employment is now 4.5 percent below its level at the start of recession, while state-local government employment is down 2.4 percent over the same period. Private sector employment has been recovering steadily but slowly over

the last two years, while state and local governments have been shedding jobs almost continuously for the last three years. The gap between reductions in private versus public sector employment is narrower if we compare current employment levels to peak levels. As of January 2012, for the nation as a whole, private sector employment is down 4.5 percent or 5.2 million jobs from the peak level recorded in January of 2008. By contrast, public sector employment is down 3.4 percent or 668,000 jobs from the peak level recorded in August of 2008. Figure 2 shows trends in state-local government employment in the past five recessions. In three of those ---- the downturns starting in 1973, 1990, and 2001 ---- public employment continued to increase while private-sector jobs were declining. Only the 1980 downturn rivals the Great Recession for the length of public employment losses. However, over the last nine months, the depth of such decline has surpassed losses associated with any other modern recession.

To examine individual states, we use three-month averages for October through December 2011 because January data are not yet available. Table 2 shows the percent change in public and private employment over the year ending in October-December 2011. Combined state and local government employment declined in 37 states and rose in 11 others, relative to year-earlier levels. State government employment is down in 33 states and higher in 17 over the year, while local government employment declined in 37 and rose in 13 states.[1]the table also shows private-sector employment, which is down for the period in only two states. The state and local government declines are widespread, while private sector employment continues to improve in most states. For the nation as a whole, state government employment is down 2.9 percent from its postrecession peak recorded in August of 2008, and local government employment is down 3.5 percent from the post-recession peak recorded in September of 2008.

Table 2: State and Local Government Employment is Down in 38 States vs. a Year Earlier Private, state and local government employment October-December moving average, 2010 vs. 2011, Percent change State Private State Local State-Local Nevada 1.6 (3.6) (4.0) (3.9) Georgia (0.1) (6.3) (2.7) (3.7) Texas 3.2 (3.2) (3.5) (3.5) Maine 0.8 (4.4) (2.5) (3.1) Pennsylvania 1.5 (6.2) (1.7) (2.8) Alabama 0.8 (3.8) (1.8) (2.5) Wisconsin 0.7 (2.9) (2.3) (2.5) Indiana 0.5 (5.1) (1.3) (2.4) Delaware (0.3) (4.9) 1.3 (2.2) Rhode Island 0.5 (0.2) (3.0) (2.1) Minnesota 1.2 (2.6) (1.7) (1.9) Oregon 2.0 1.2 (3.2) (1.9) Washington 2.6 (2.5) (1.6) (1.9) Michigan 2.2 (1.0) (2.1) (1.8) North Carolina 0.9 (2.9) (1.2) (1.7) South Carolina 1.6 (1.2) (1.8) (1.6) New Mexico 1.6 (2.0) (1.3) (1.5) Iowa 1.4 (2.5) (0.7) (1.2) Kentucky 1.9 (1.7) (0.7) (1.1) West Virginia 1.5 (1.0) (1.1) (1.0) Hawaii 1.5 (1.1) (0.9) (1.0) South Dakota 1.4 0.4 (1.5) (1.0) Ohio 1.8 2.0 (1.8) (0.9) Alaska 0.6 0.1 (1.5) (0.9) New Jersey 1.1 (8.2) 1.8 (0.8) Florida 1.9 (2.2) (0.4) (0.8) Illinois 1.3 (2.3) (0.4) (0.8) Massachusetts 1.9 0.4 (1.3) (0.7) Maryland 0.9 0.5 (1.2) (0.7) Idaho 1.5 (1.7) (0.3) (0.6) Vermont 2.1 5.3 (3.9) (0.6) North Dakota 6.8 (0.8) (0.4) (0.5) Nebraska 2.1 (0.3) (0.5) (0.5) New York 1.2 0.2 (0.4) (0.3) Kansas 1.0 (0.1) (0.1) (0.1) Louisiana 3.1 (2.9) 1.4 (0.1) New Hampshire 1.5 (2.5) 0.9 (0.1) Connecticut 0.6 0.3 (0.2) (0.0) Colorado 1.5 1.8 (0.7) 0.0 Missouri 0.1 1.2 (0.4) 0.1 Mississippi 0.9 (2.0) 1.1 0.2 Utah 3.5 (0.4) 0.5 0.2 Arizona 2.1 (0.7) 1.2 0.8 Oklahoma 3.4 1.4 1.1 1.2 Montana 1.2 7.8 (2.0) 1.3 Virginia 0.6 0.6 1.7 1.4 Tennessee 0.9 1.3 2.2 2.0 Arkansas 0.1 0.5 3.4 2.3 California 1.9 (0.2) 3.1 2.4 Wyoming 2.0 2.9 4.2 3.9 United States 1.6 (1.6) (0.5) (0.8) Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (CES, seasonally unadjusted).

Table 3 takes a longer perspective, showing the change in state and local government as well as private sector employment since the end of 2007, right before the start of the Great Recession.[2] In the months of October-December of 2011, private sector employment remained below the 2007 levels in 47 states. The only three states reporting gains in private employment over this period are North Dakota, Alaska and Texas at 13, 3.1 and 0.9 percent respectively. While a majority of states have reduced combined state-local government employment over this period, 20 show noticeable increases.

Table 3: Compared to Pre-Recession, Public Employment Picture is Mixed Private, state and local government employment October-December moving average, 2010 vs. 2011, Percent change State Private State Local State-Local Nevada (13.9) (5.7) (10.2) (9.0) Rhode Island (6.0) (6.7) (8.5) (7.9) Georgia (9.1) (8.5) (6.0) (6.7) Maine (3.8) (6.6) (6.1) (6.3) Michigan (7.7) 5.2 (10.1) (5.7) South Carolina (6.9) (5.3) (4.4) (4.7) Arizona (11.2) (8.7) (3.3) (4.6) California (7.3) (0.0) (4.6) (3.6) Ohio (6.2) (0.2) (4.5) (3.5) New Jersey (5.3) (9.7) (1.3) (3.5) Indiana (7.0) (3.3) (3.5) (3.5) Florida (9.6) (1.3) (4.0) (3.5) Connecticut (4.8) (2.0) (3.2) (2.8) Alabama (8.5) (1.0) (3.4) (2.6) North Carolina (8.1) (3.5) (1.3) (2.0) Minnesota (4.3) (1.1) (2.2) (1.9) Pennsylvania (2.1) (5.4) (0.6) (1.8) Washington (5.2) (3.9) (0.7) (1.7) Wisconsin (5.3) (10.8) 1.7 (1.7) Hawaii (6.4) (2.2) 1.9 (1.4) New Mexico (6.6) (2.7) (0.5) (1.3) Vermont (1.7) 0.7 (2.1) (1.1) Kansas (4.9) (3.1) (0.3) (0.9) New York (1.6) (2.3) (0.5) (0.9) Illinois (5.8) (3.1) 0.3 (0.3) Massachusetts (1.8) 4.7 (2.2) (0.1) Missouri (6.6) 0.7 (0.4) (0.1) Iowa (2.9) (2.5) 0.9 (0.1) Oregon (7.7) 8.5 (3.3) 0.0 Louisiana (0.1) (5.6) 3.1 0.0 Kentucky (4.5) 1.1 (0.2) 0.3 Delaware (7.9) (3.3) 5.0 0.3 Maryland (4.4) 4.7 (1.4) 0.5 Mississippi (6.5) 0.7 1.0 0.9 Idaho (8.4) (6.2) 4.4 1.4 Virginia (4.3) 3.6 0.6 1.4 Texas 0.9 1.1 2.7 2.3 Oklahoma (1.5) 0.9 3.2 2.5 Montana (4.3) 6.1 0.7 2.6 South Dakota (0.7) 3.8 2.5 2.9 New Hampshire (3.3) 0.3 4.3 3.1 West Virginia (1.5) 4.1 2.7 3.2 Tennessee (7.0) 1.1 4.2 3.4 Nebraska (1.3) 5.8 2.5 3.4 Colorado (5.7) 12.3 0.7 3.8 Utah (4.9) 2.0 5.0 3.9 Arkansas (3.9) 4.6 4.3 4.4 Alaska 3.1 4.6 4.3 4.4 North Dakota 13.0 6.0 4.8 5.2 Wyoming (4.1) 11.8 11.2 11.3 United States (5.2) (1.0) (1.5) (1.3) Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (CES, seasonally unadjusted). Figure 3 compares the change in state government and local government employment compared to three years ago, by state. Nearly half of the states, including Georgia,

Nevada, and South Carolina, showed declines in both sectors over the period. State employment has fallen in 30 states, and local government employment in 34. Public employment cutbacks began earlier in some states than in others, so that an illustration of overall reductions from peak levels would show a somewhat different picture. Figure 4 shows the change in state-local government and private sector employment compared to three years ago, by state. Only three states ---- Alaska, North Dakota and Texas--- experienced gains in both state-local government and private employment, while 34 states showed declines in both sectors over the year. Wyoming increased government employment by more than 6 percent while private-sector jobs were declining. Nevada had the harshest experience in the terms of employment drops in both private and public employment over the period.

Local government employment is at least two to three times as large as state government employment in most states, and it accounts by far for the largest number of government jobs lost in the current recession. Elementary and secondary education tends to dominate local government employment, although non-education employment is down as well. Figure 5 shows that the decline in local government education employment is far greater in this recession than in other recent recessions, and is far deeper compared to declines in the 1980 double-dip recession, when local government employment was influenced significantly by property tax revolts and limitations. For the nation as a whole, local government education employment has fallen by 270,300 jobs since the July 2008 peak, a 3.3 percent decline.

Table 4 shows the latest data on local government education employment, in the 36 states for which BLS reported such data on a monthly basis. At least 22 states (among those for which we have data) have seen declines in local education positions over the past year, ranging from 0.3 percent to 6.8 percent. The largest reductions appear in Vermont and Oregon at 6.8 and 4.5 percent respectively. Fourteen states added jobs in this sector, with particularly large increases in California and Tennessee.

Table 4: Local Government Educational Services Employment October-December moving average, 2010 vs. 2011, Percent change State 2010 2011 Percent change Vermont 25.1 23.4 (6.8) Oregon 104.0 99.4 (4.5) Washington 158.7 152.0 (4.2) South Carolina 107.2 102.8 (4.1) Texas 872.4 836.5 (4.1) Maryland 161.0 155.1 (3.7) Alabama 103.7 100.4 (3.2) Pennsylvania 314.5 305.7 (2.8) Wisconsin 166.2 161.6 (2.7) North Carolina 226.7 221.0 (2.5) Minnesota 142.3 138.8 (2.4) Georgia 254.0 248.2 (2.3) Idaho 42.6 41.7 (2.2) Kentucky 117.8 115.5 (2.0) Michigan 228.4 224.2 (1.8) Montana 30.1 29.6 (1.8) New Mexico 58.8 57.8 (1.8) Ohio 299.9 294.9 (1.7) Mississippi 87.6 86.9 (0.9) Indiana 157.5 156.1 (0.8) Massachusetts 174.6 173.6 (0.6) Utah 67.0 66.8 (0.3) Iowa 103.0 103.3 0.3 Alaska 25.2 25.2 0.3 Nebraska 64.2 64.6 0.6 North Dakota 23.2 23.4 1.0 Colorado 129.9 132.0 1.6 Delaware 19.0 19.3 1.9 Connecticut 97.0 99.0 2.1 Illinois 372.2 380.1 2.1 Wyoming 26.2 26.9 2.5 New Jersey 268.9 277.1 3.0 South Dakota 26.9 27.8 3.6 Arizona 153.8 159.5 3.7 Tennessee 151.5 162.9 7.5 California 892.4 962.3 7.8 United States 7,957.7 7,859.0 (1.2) Source: U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics (CES, seasonally unadjusted). Note: Not all states report detailed local educational employment data to BLS. [1] This table is based on seasonally unadjusted data. We use the unadjusted data because they are available from the Bureau of Labor Statistics for more states than are seasonally adjusted data, but because they are not adjusted for seasonal fluctuations we compare to the same period from a year earlier rather than to recent months. [2] To reduce "bounciness" in the data, we average state-by-state data for October through December.