Board of Trustees Self-Evaluation Board Self-Evaluation. 1. In Board Development and Operation, Trustees: Above. In Need of Excellent

Similar documents
UCB Administrative Guidelines for Endowed Chairs

KSBA Staff Review of HB 520 Charter Schools Rep. Carney - (as introduced )

P A S A D E N A C I T Y C O L L E G E SHARED GOVERNANCE

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AS REVISED BY THE COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION APPROPRIATIONS ANALYSIS

Program Change Proposal:

Marketing Committee Terms of Reference

Charter School Reporting and Monitoring Activity

BY-LAWS THE COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA

Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan,

Hamline University. College of Liberal Arts POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL

M.S. in Environmental Science Graduate Program Handbook. Department of Biology, Geology, and Environmental Science

St. Mary Cathedral Parish & School

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

STANISLAUS COUNTY CIVIL GRAND JURY CASE #08-04 LA GRANGE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL DISTRICT

DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND ECONOMICS

VI-1.12 Librarian Policy on Promotion and Permanent Status

Xenia Community Schools Board of Education Goals. Approved May 12, 2014

Public Comments (2 minute limit per person) AS Executive Board Reports (15 minutes)

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

Regional Bureau for Education in Africa (BREDA)

Engagement of Teaching Intensive Faculty. What does Engagement mean?

CONFLICT OF INTEREST CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, CHICO. Audit Report June 11, 2014

SECTION 1: SOLES General Information FACULTY & PERSONNEL HANDBOOK

SCICU Legislative Strategic Plan 2018

Approved Academic Titles

Faculty Athletics Committee Annual Report to the Faculty Council November 15, 2013

The Role of Trustee. Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education Seeking student trustee candidates at Slippery Rock University

LaGrange College. Faculty Handbook

EUA Annual Conference Bergen. University Autonomy in Europe NOVA University within the context of Portugal

July 17, 2017 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL. John Tafaro, President Chatfield College State Route 251 St. Martin, OH Dear President Tafaro:

Frequently Asked Questions Archdiocesan Collaborative Schools (ACS)

REVIEW CYCLES: FACULTY AND LIBRARIANS** CANDIDATES HIRED ON OR AFTER JULY 14, 2014 SERVICE WHO REVIEWS WHEN CONTRACT

DRAFT VERSION 2, 02/24/12

FRANKLIN D. CHAMBERS,

Upward Bound Program

CONSTITUTION COLLEGE OF LIBERAL ARTS

Intervention in Struggling Schools Through Receivership New York State. May 2015

MIDTERM REPORT. Solano Community College 4000 Suisun Valley Road Fairfield, California

SORORITY AND FRATERNITY AFFAIRS FLORIDA GREEK STANDARDS ACCREDITATION PROGRAM FOR SOCIAL SORORITIES AND FRATERNITIES

Associate Professor of Electrical Power Systems Engineering (CAE17/06RA) School of Creative Arts and Engineering / Engineering

Brockton Public Schools. Professional Development Plan Teacher s Guide

November 6, Re: Higher Education Provisions in H.R. 1, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act. Dear Chairman Brady and Ranking Member Neal:

A Financial Model to Support the Future of The California State University

PATTERNS OF ADMINISTRATION DEPARTMENT OF BIOMEDICAL EDUCATION & ANATOMY THE OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY

Council of the European Union Brussels, 4 November 2015 (OR. en)

Dakar Framework for Action. Education for All: Meeting our Collective Commitments. World Education Forum Dakar, Senegal, April 2000

Pennsylvania Association of Councils of Trustees THE ROLE OF TRUSTEE IN PENNSYLVANIA S STATE SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION

John F. Kennedy Middle School

First Line Manager Development. Facilitated Blended Accredited

Lakewood Board of Education 200 Ramsey Avenue, Lakewood, NJ 08701

Department of Anatomy Bylaws

Lincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal

SME Academia cooperation in research projects in Research for the Benefit of SMEs within FP7 Capacities programme

SPORTS POLICIES AND GUIDELINES

ARTICLE IV: STUDENT ACTIVITIES

Colorado State University Department of Construction Management. Assessment Results and Action Plans

Alternative education: Filling the gap in emergency and post-conflict situations

Position Statements. Index of Association Position Statements

FUNDING GUIDELINES APPLICATION FORM BANKSETA Doctoral & Post-Doctoral Research Funding

Comprehensive Student Services Program Review

ECO 2013-Principles of Macroeconomics

Guidelines for the Use of the Continuing Education Unit (CEU)

TAI TEAM ASSESSMENT INVENTORY

Comprehensive Program Review (CPR)

BYLAWS of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan

SELF-STUDY QUESTIONNAIRE FOR REVIEW of the COMPUTER SCIENCE PROGRAM and the INFORMATION SYSTEMS PROGRAM

Faculty governance especially the

AB104 Adult Education Block Grant. Performance Year:

Comprehensive Program Review (CPR)

JICA s Operation in Education Sector. - Present and Future -

Announcement of Vacancy Superintendent of Schools. Frontier Central School District. Apply by October 20, 2017 to:

KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING

STATE CAPITAL SPENDING ON PK 12 SCHOOL FACILITIES NORTH CAROLINA

THE VISION OF THE BOARD OF SCHOOL TRUSTEES

An Introduction to LEAP

The University of North Carolina Strategic Plan Online Survey and Public Forums Executive Summary

Financing Education In Minnesota

State Parental Involvement Plan

Graduation Initiative 2025 Goals San Jose State

OAKLAND UNIVERSITY CONTRACT TO CHARTER A PUBLIC SCHOOL ACADEMY AND RELATED DOCUMENTS ISSUED TO: (A PUBLIC SCHOOL ACADEMY)

Ministry Audit Form 2016

Peter N. Tabbot Phone: Summary of Qualifications. Professional Experience

Pattern of Administration, Department of Art. Pattern of Administration Department of Art Revised: Autumn 2016 OAA Approved December 11, 2016

VOL VISION 2020 STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION

Regulations for Saudi Universities Personnel Including Staff Members and the Like

Building Mutual Trust and Rapport. Navigating the Intersection of Administrators and Faculty in Short-Term Program Planning

SELF-STUDY QUESTIONNAIRE FOR REVIEW of the COMPUTER SCIENCE PROGRAM

GUIDE FOR ESTABLISHING LOCAL SCHOOL ADVISORY COUNCILS

Raj Soin College of Business Bylaws

2020 Strategic Plan for Diversity and Inclusive Excellence. Six Terrains

Review of Governance Culture and Practices: Memorial University. Harriet Lewis

Self Assessment. InTech Collegiate High School. Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT

Orange Elementary School FY15 Budget Overview. Tari N. Thomas Superintendent of Schools

The Chapter Activation Form (to submit in your application) is on page 6 of this document.

MANAGEMENT CHARTER OF THE FOUNDATION HET RIJNLANDS LYCEUM

Understanding Co operatives Through Research

Productive partnerships to promote media and information literacy for knowledge societies: IFLA and UNESCO s collaborative work

THE 2016 FORUM ON ACCREDITATION August 17-18, 2016, Toronto, ON

Professor Division of Agricultural Education College of Agriculture, Montana State University Bozeman, MT

Transcription:

Board of Trustees Self-Evaluation 2016 1. Board Self-Evaluation 1. In Board Development and Operation, Trustees: 1) Conduct Board discussion at public meetings so that all trustees have an opportunity to participate in the decision-making. 2) Receive adequate information on which to base decisions. 3) Conduct meetings in an orderly, efficient manner and encourages public comment. 4) Gather information independently, as they deem necessary, without making unilateral decisions or micro-managing. 5) Treat one another with respect and civility, in public and closed sessions. 6) Participate regularly in seminars, conferences and retreats. 7) Recognize and support the Foundation goals of both colleges. 8) Share significant information about pertinent issues at public meetings. 9) Orient newly elected trustees to their roles and responsibilities, District policies and the District Mission (new board member orientation). 10) Contribute to the Accreditation process when mandated. 11) Are appropriately involved in the bond construction program. 12) Once the Board reaches a decision, it acts as a whole. 13) Establish policies consistent with the YCCD Mission Statement to ensure the quality, integrity, and improvement of student learning programs and services and the resources necessary to support them. 14) Self-evaluation processes for assessing board performance are clearly defined, implemented and published in its policies. 15) Have a code of ethics that includes a clearly defined policy for dealing with behavior that violates its code. 16) Have a mechanism for providing for continuity of Board membership and staggered terms of office. 1

2

2. Board 2015-2016 Special Priorities Progress: 1) Increase partnerships with K-12 partners and the business community to promote and support community college outreach efforts through our chancellor, presidents and the Board. 2a) Maintain the Yosemite Community College District General Fund reserve at 10% or greater on General Fund unrestricted expenditure budgets. 2b) Develop General Fund reserve criteria to support this Board special priority which will provide stability to the District when faced with unforeseen State or Local funding shortfalls. 3) Define and develop the Board of Trustee professional development plan. 4) Complete the implementation of the revised Chancellor Evaluation process. 5) Encourage a new reporting procedure/format for faculty sabbaticals that informs the Board of Trustees. 6) Encourage participation of YCCD Faculty in college graduations. 7) Continue to support increased funding for the colleges by actively soliciting private sector and donor support. 3

3. In the Financial Management of the District, Trustees: 1) Understand the fiscal condition of the District. 2) Support long-range planning and the most efficient use of District resources. 3) Are involved in the planning for and implementation of the Facilities Master Plan through the use of bond revenue. 4) Are informed about fiscal developments at all governmental levels which might impact the District through the Chancellor and Executive Vice Chancellor. 5) Understand the fiscal components that connect the mission, vision, and strategic plan to the budget. 4

4. In Supporting the Mission of the District, Trustees: 1) Gather information about the educational and service needs of the community. 2) Understand the complex nature of the District s mission. 3) Support Excellence and Diversity within the District. 5

5. In their Relationship with the Chancellor, Trustees: 1) Communicate regularly and openly with the Chancellor. 2) Receive timely reports on District issues from the Chancellor. 3) Inform the Chancellor of significant contacts by students, community members, faculty or staff that may have a bearing on District policy decisions. 4) Maintain a climate of mutual trust and support between the Board and the Chancellor. 5) Complete a thorough and objective evaluation of the Chancellor s performance annually, indicating areas which may need improvement, as well as appropriate commendations, based on mutually agreed-on performance, goals and leadership qualities. 6

6. In Relationship with the Colleges, Trustees: 1) Understand the participatory governance concept and encourage open lines of communication between the District and the colleges. 2) Understand the role of Central Services in support of the colleges. 3) Kept informed with instructional program decisions in terms of what is best for the students. 7

7. In their Relationship with the Community, Trustees: 1) Promote a positive image of the District and its colleges in cooperation with the local media. 2) Value community attitudes and recognize the needs of special interest groups but primarily focus on the general mission of the District. 3) Acknowledge that they are only part of a seven member Board which must function in a formal public setting, even when giving individual answers or making public statements. Board of Trustees Self-Evaluation 2016 2. Board Subjective Comments The following questions are purely subjective, but your short responses will assist in the overall self-evaluation and provide guidance for the Boards future. 8

1. What are the Boards greatest strengths? 2. What are areas in which the Board could improve? 9

3. As a Trustee, what causes me the greatest satisfaction? 4. As a Trustee, what causes me the greatest concern? 10

5. As a Trustee, I would like to see the Board change in the following ways: 6. I would like to see the Board add the following goal(s): 11