Glenridge Middle School IB World School Middle Years Programme Assessment Policy

Similar documents
EQuIP Review Feedback

What does Quality Look Like?

Chart 5: Overview of standard C

and secondary sources, attending to such features as the date and origin of the information.

Indicators Teacher understands the active nature of student learning and attains information about levels of development for groups of students.

Personal Project. IB Guide: Project Aims and Objectives 2 Project Components... 3 Assessment Criteria.. 4 External Moderation.. 5

New Jersey Department of Education World Languages Model Program Application Guidance Document

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

Indiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning. PBL Certification Process

NC Global-Ready Schools

Plattsburgh City School District SIP Building Goals

Analyzing Linguistically Appropriate IEP Goals in Dual Language Programs

Classroom Connections Examining the Intersection of the Standards for Mathematical Content and the Standards for Mathematical Practice

MYP Language A Course Outline Year 3

Table of Contents PROCEDURES

Midterm Evaluation of Student Teachers

Developing an Assessment Plan to Learn About Student Learning

MYP personal project guide 2011 overview of objectives

Department of Geography Bachelor of Arts in Geography Plan for Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes The University of New Mexico

The ELA/ELD Framework Companion: a guide to assist in navigating the Framework

Geographical Location School, Schedules, Classmates, Activities,

Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011)

ISD 2184, Luverne Public Schools. xcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcv. Local Literacy Plan bnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbn

PROGRESS MONITORING FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES Participant Materials

ED : Methods for Teaching EC-6 Social Studies, Language Arts and Fine Arts

MBA 5652, Research Methods Course Syllabus. Course Description. Course Material(s) Course Learning Outcomes. Credits.

Instructional Supports for Common Core and Beyond: FORMATIVE ASSESMENT

eportfolio Guide Missouri State University

Honors Mathematics. Introduction and Definition of Honors Mathematics

San Diego State University Division of Undergraduate Studies Sustainability Center Sustainability Center Assistant Position Description

Queensborough Public Library (Queens, NY) CCSS Guidance for TASC Professional Development Curriculum

PEDAGOGY AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES STANDARDS (EC-GRADE 12)

Florida Reading Endorsement Alignment Matrix Competency 1

ED487: Methods for Teaching EC-6 Social Studies, Language Arts and Fine Arts

Final Teach For America Interim Certification Program

Sample from: 'State Studies' Product code: STP550 The entire product is available for purchase at STORYPATH.

C a l i f o r n i a N o n c r e d i t a n d A d u l t E d u c a t i o n. E n g l i s h a s a S e c o n d L a n g u a g e M o d e l

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Ohio s New Learning Standards: K-12 World Languages

EDUC-E328 Science in the Elementary Schools

UASCS Summer Planning Committee

Making the ELPS-TELPAS Connection Grades K 12 Overview

UC San Diego - WASC Exhibit 7.1 Inventory of Educational Effectiveness Indicators

Program Report for the Preparation of Journalism Teachers

INTERNATIONAL BACCALAUREATE AT IVANHOE GRAMMAR SCHOOL. An Introduction to the International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme For Students and Families

A Survey of Authentic Assessment in the Teaching of Social Sciences

SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN Salem High School

CWSEI Teaching Practices Inventory

Georgia Department of Education

IB Diploma Program Language Policy San Jose High School

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Program Matrix - Reading English 6-12 (DOE Code 398) University of Florida. Reading

Politics and Society Curriculum Specification

Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011: 20. Faculty member completing template: Molly Dugan (Date: 1/26/2012)

Albemarle County Public Schools School Improvement Plan KEY CHANGES THIS YEAR

Secondary English-Language Arts

College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School, Grades 9-12

STUDENT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION AND PROMOTION

30 Day Unit Plan: Greetings & Self-intro.

Content Teaching Methods: Social Studies. Dr. Melinda Butler

Engaging Faculty in Reform:

The Oregon Literacy Framework of September 2009 as it Applies to grades K-3

BSM 2801, Sport Marketing Course Syllabus. Course Description. Course Textbook. Course Learning Outcomes. Credits.

KENTUCKY COGNIT IVE LIT ERACY MODEL UNIT PLANNING TEMPLATE

TEAM Evaluation Model Overview

John Jay College of Criminal Justice, CUNY ASSESSMENT REPORT: SPRING Undergraduate Public Administration Major

TEKS Resource System. Effective Planning from the IFD & Assessment. Presented by: Kristin Arterbury, ESC Region 12

Self Assessment. InTech Collegiate High School. Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT

School Action Plan: Template Overview

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

The Curriculum in Primary Schools

Purpose of internal assessment. Guidance and authenticity. Internal assessment. Assessment

Dowling, P. J., Festing, M., & Engle, A. (2013). International human resource management (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.

Interdisciplinary Ph.D. in Education Sciences College of Education, University of Kentucky

Getting Results Continuous Improvement Plan

2013/Q&PQ THE SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY

Developing Students Research Proposal Design through Group Investigation Method

Youth Sector 5-YEAR ACTION PLAN ᒫᒨ ᒣᔅᑲᓈᐦᒉᑖ ᐤ. Office of the Deputy Director General

Distinguished Teacher Review

Focus on. Learning THE ACCREDITATION MANUAL 2013 WASC EDITION

Presentation 4 23 May 2017 Erasmus+ LOAF Project, Vilnius, Lithuania Dr Declan Kennedy, Department of Education, University College Cork, Ireland.

DATE ISSUED: 11/2/ of 12 UPDATE 103 EHBE(LEGAL)-P

Arkansas Tech University Secondary Education Exit Portfolio

Xenia High School Credit Flexibility Plan (CFP) Application

Principles, theories and practices of learning and development

BSc (Hons) Banking Practice and Management (Full-time programmes of study)

WHI Voorhees SOL Unit WHI.3 Date

Requirements for the Degree: Bachelor of Science in Education in Early Childhood Special Education (P-5)

ESL Curriculum and Assessment

ONBOARDING NEW TEACHERS: WHAT THEY NEED TO SUCCEED. MSBO Spring 2017

Teaching Task Rewrite. Teaching Task: Rewrite the Teaching Task: What is the theme of the poem Mother to Son?

Unit 7 Data analysis and design

IBCP Language Portfolio Core Requirement for the International Baccalaureate Career-Related Programme

PEDAGOGICAL LEARNING WALKS: MAKING THE THEORY; PRACTICE

International School of Kigali, Rwanda

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)

Exemplar Grade 9 Reading Test Questions

RED 3313 Language and Literacy Development course syllabus Dr. Nancy Marshall Associate Professor Reading and Elementary Education

Copyright Corwin 2014

PELLISSIPPI STATE TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE MASTER SYLLABUS APPLIED MECHANICS MET 2025

Transcription:

Glenridge Middle School IB World School Middle Years Programme Assessment Policy Glenridge Middle School believes in and values students ability to be inquirers, risk-takers and thinkers; to communicate knowledge and in real world contexts as open-minded, reflective, principled and caring learners. To this end, our assessments are designed to measure student growth during the teaching and learning process and report student s achievement in each of the eight MYP subjects. I. Assessment is student centered: Assessment practices take into account different learning styles and abilities, student s prior knowledge, and cultural diversity. Assessment is authentic and provides opportunities for students to demonstrate their knowledge,, skills and attitudes. Assessment is designed to promote student development of critical thinking, verbal reasoning, and reflection. Inquiry and real world application will guide the teaching and learning process. Assessment occurs at the beginning of teaching to influence the teachers planning, during teaching to provide students feedback on their learning and identify areas for improvement and after teaching to evaluate student s level of achievement. II. Assessment is a shared process: Assessment allows for collaboration between students, parents and teachers. Each group plays a key role in the assessment process. Students are aware of the objectives and criteria for assessment at all stages of the learning process. Students consistently engage in self-evaluation and reflection. Parents are aware of the assessment criteria and tasks as well as their child s achievement through Progress Book, the online reporting system. Students, parents and teachers discuss student learning and achievement through comments on assessments, daily/weekly monitoring reports, Progress Book, emails, telephone conversations and electronic or face-to-face conferences. III. Assessment provides meaningful feedback: Assessment provides students feedback on their level of achievement on the MYP objectives or the Florida Standards.

Assessment provides students timely quantitative and/or qualitative feedback before, during and after teaching and learning identifying the current level of achievement, including areas and ways to improve. Assessment provides teachers with information to reflect upon and use within planning, teaching and learning process. IV. Planning for Assessment: Assessment drives the instructional planning process in all classrooms. Assessment is aligned with MYP objectives and Florida Standards to allow students to achieve the required objectives and standards in each subject. Teachers plan common assessment tasks collaboratively within grade levels. Assessment tasks increase in complexity of content and thinking skills in each year of the programme. V. Assessment Strategies: Formative assessments allow students to demonstrate their knowledge and during the teaching and learning process. Students receive feedback on how/what they need to improve. Teachers collect and analyze data to inform teaching activities and learning experiences. Teachers may decide to remediate, accelerate, extend or differentiate based on the student data. Teachers use a variety of formative assessment strategies including, but not limited to exit slips, Kahoot, quizzes, short writing assignments, Socratic seminars, classroom presentations, Cornell notes, Venn-diagrams and think-pair-share. Summative assessments measure student s knowledge and at the end of the teaching and learning process. Students receive a mark using the MYP criteria evaluating their demonstration of mastery on the real-world application of content. Teachers collect and analyze current summative assessment data to inform teaching and learning experiences in the next unit of instruction. Teachers use a variety of summative assessments, including but not limited to short and extended response questions, oral and visual presentations, portfolios, research projects, process journals, lab reports, debates and performances. Teachers participate in standardization of assessment, vertically and horizontally in subjects, to develop quality assessments that effectively measure student knowledge and of the criteria and to consistently apply the criteria to student assessments.

All teachers of the grade level student team administer the same summative assessments. VI. Assessment is criterion related Each subject has four criteria: Criterion A, Criterion B, Criterion C and Criterion D that will be used to assess growth and achievement. Criterion A Criterion B Criterion C Criterion D Language and Literature Analyzing Organizing Producing Text Using Language Language acquisition Comprehending spoken and/or visual text Comprehending written and/or visual text Communicating Using language Individuals and societies Investigating Communicating Thinking Critically Sciences Inquiring and designing Processing and evaluating Reflecting an the impacts of science Mathematics Arts Investigating patterns Communicating Applying mathematics in realworld contexts Developing skills Thinking creatively Responding Physical and health education Planning for performance Applying and performing Reflecting and improving performance Design Inquiring and analyzing Developing ideas Creating the solution Evaluating Community Project Investigating Planning Taking Action Reflecting Interdisciplinary Disciplinary grounding Synthesizing Communicating Reflecting Each criterion is assessed using a rubric that is divided into five bands. Each band has a specific description of the level of achievement on the learning expectation or strand. Below is a chart with general descriptions used to measure student achievement.

Level of Achievement Descriptor 0 No demonstrated 1-2 Limited 3-4 Basic 5-6 Meets expectations 7-8 Exceeds expectations Each criteria strand (learning expectation) will be assessed at least a minimum two times over the course of a school year. Criteria strands increase in complexity from year 1-3 in the criteria rubrics. a. 6 th Grade- Year 1 Criteria Rubrics b. 7 th Grade- Year 1 Criteria Rubrics c. 8 th Grade- Year 3 Criteria Rubrics Copies of the criteria rubrics in each subject are provided to students and are also available on the Glenridge Middle School IB webpage. Assessment tasks may include task-specific clarifications. VII. Recording and reporting student achievement Teachers will record student achievement on the criteria into Progress Book using the following weights in the eight middle school MYP subjects: a. Criterion A- 20% weight b. Criterion B- 20% weight c. Criterion C- 20% weight d. Criterion D- 20% weight e. Self-Management- 20% weight (organization, affective skills, reflection)

Teachers will record student achievement on the criteria into Progress Book using the following weights in high school courses MYP subjects: a. Criterion A- 25% weight b. Criterion B- 25% weight c. Criterion C- 25% weight d. Criterion D- 25% weight Learning Strategies teachers will use the following criteria and weights to record student achievement in Progress Book: a. Criterion A- Knowledge and Understanding 25% weight b. Criterion B- Investigating 25% weight c. Criterion C- Using Language 25% weight d. Criterion D- Self-Management- 25% weight Teachers will record and report assessment using ProgressBook for at least two formative assessments per week and at least one summative assessment per unit of instruction. Students assessments will be marked with a 0-8 mark aligned to the appropriate IB MYP criterion. 0-8 mark on each assessment. Scores are reported in ProgressBook 0-100 percentage score using the following conversion. IB MYP Achievement Level OCPS Percentage Score OCPS Grade Missing 50 F 0 55 F 1 60 D 2 65 D 3 70 C 4 75 C 5 80 B 6 90 A 7 95 A 8 100 A

Student grades of A-F are reported quarterly on report cards and progress reports. These reports are available through Progress Book. VIII. Analysis of Assessment: Assessment data is analyzed individually by teachers and collaboratively with subject teams, coaches and administration. Data analysis is recorded and reported by the subject team on Sharepoint. Assessment data influences planning, teaching and learning as well as teacher professional development. Assessment data is used to set teaching and learning goals in the School Improvement Plan (SIP). Policy Revised 11/2017