Methodology to define the eight proficiency levels

Similar documents
Declaration of competencies

5. UPPER INTERMEDIATE

Analysis: Evaluation: Knowledge: Comprehension: Synthesis: Application:

Developing a Language for Assessing Creativity: a taxonomy to support student learning and assessment

Maximizing Learning Through Course Alignment and Experience with Different Types of Knowledge

Beyond the Blend: Optimizing the Use of your Learning Technologies. Bryan Chapman, Chapman Alliance

Document number: 2013/ Programs Committee 6/2014 (July) Agenda Item 42.0 Bachelor of Engineering with Honours in Software Engineering

Developing True/False Test Sheet Generating System with Diagnosing Basic Cognitive Ability

Promoting Active Learning in University Classes

Automating Outcome Based Assessment

Taxonomy of the cognitive domain: An example of architectural education program

Language Acquisition Chart

STUDENT ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION POLICY

Referencing the Danish Qualifications Framework for Lifelong Learning to the European Qualifications Framework

Researcher Development Assessment A: Knowledge and intellectual abilities

PROJECT DESCRIPTION SLAM

MASTER S THESIS GUIDE MASTER S PROGRAMME IN COMMUNICATION SCIENCE

Mastering Team Skills and Interpersonal Communication. Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Grade 4. Common Core Adoption Process. (Unpacked Standards)

South Carolina English Language Arts

USING LEARNING THEORY IN A HYPERMEDIA-BASED PETRI NET MODELING TUTORIAL

CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

Qualification handbook

Writing for the AP U.S. History Exam

Protocol for using the Classroom Walkthrough Observation Instrument

Higher education is becoming a major driver of economic competitiveness

Analyzing Linguistically Appropriate IEP Goals in Dual Language Programs

THE QUEEN S SCHOOL Whole School Pay Policy

ELA/ELD Standards Correlation Matrix for ELD Materials Grade 1 Reading

EQuIP Review Feedback

Business. Pearson BTEC Level 1 Introductory in. Specification

Text Type Purpose Structure Language Features Article

Think A F R I C A when assessing speaking. C.E.F.R. Oral Assessment Criteria. Think A F R I C A - 1 -

Self Study Report Computer Science

PhD Competences in Food Studies

Fair Measures. Newcastle University Job Grading Structure SUMMARY

Arizona s English Language Arts Standards th Grade ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS

Khairul Hisyam Kamarudin, PhD 22 Feb 2017 / UTM Kuala Lumpur

Activities, Exercises, Assignments Copyright 2009 Cem Kaner 1

PEDAGOGICAL LEARNING WALKS: MAKING THE THEORY; PRACTICE

General study plan for third-cycle programmes in Sociology

Emma Kushtina ODL organisation system analysis. Szczecin University of Technology

Digital Media Literacy

The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages p. 58 to p. 82

PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION

Guidelines for Writing an Internship Report

TRAITS OF GOOD WRITING

Extending Place Value with Whole Numbers to 1,000,000

Setting the Scene: ECVET and ECTS the two transfer (and accumulation) systems for education and training

HARPER ADAMS UNIVERSITY Programme Specification

KIS MYP Humanities Research Journal

Stacks Teacher notes. Activity description. Suitability. Time. AMP resources. Equipment. Key mathematical language. Key processes

Outcome Based Education 15/01/2012

MASTER S COURSES FASHION START-UP

THINKING SKILLS, STUDENT ENGAGEMENT BRAIN-BASED LEARNING LOOKING THROUGH THE EYES OF THE LEARNER AND SCHEMA ACTIVATOR ENGAGEMENT POINT

Reference to Tenure track faculty in this document includes tenured faculty, unless otherwise noted.

The Task. A Guide for Tutors in the Rutgers Writing Centers Written and edited by Michael Goeller and Karen Kalteissen

November 2012 MUET (800)

Providing Feedback to Learners. A useful aide memoire for mentors

Dublin City Schools Broadcast Video I Graded Course of Study GRADES 9-12

ACTION LEARNING: AN INTRODUCTION AND SOME METHODS INTRODUCTION TO ACTION LEARNING

Instructional Supports for Common Core and Beyond: FORMATIVE ASSESMENT

General syllabus for third-cycle courses and study programmes in

Introduction to the Common European Framework (CEF)

Prentice Hall Literature Common Core Edition Grade 10, 2012

Programme Specification

Statewide Framework Document for:

MFL SPECIFICATION FOR JUNIOR CYCLE SHORT COURSE

The College Board Redesigned SAT Grade 12

LA1 - High School English Language Development 1 Curriculum Essentials Document

Assessing speaking skills:. a workshop for teacher development. Ben Knight

Quality teaching and learning in the educational context: Teacher pedagogy to support learners of a modern digital society

Show and Tell Persuasion

State of play of EQF implementation in Montenegro Zora Bogicevic, Ministry of Education Rajko Kosovic, VET Center

Learning and Teaching

This Performance Standards include four major components. They are

Language Arts: ( ) Instructional Syllabus. Teachers: T. Beard address

Characteristics of Academic Writing

English as a Second Language Unpacked Content

Strands & Standards Reference Guide for World Languages

Correspondence between the DRDP (2015) and the California Preschool Learning Foundations. Foundations (PLF) in Language and Literacy

Metadiscourse in Knowledge Building: A question about written or verbal metadiscourse

Level 6. Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) Fee for 2017/18 is 9,250*

A Characterization of Calculus I Final Exams in U.S. Colleges and Universities

Systematic reviews in theory and practice for library and information studies

Ohio s New Learning Standards: K-12 World Languages

Doctoral GUIDELINES FOR GRADUATE STUDY

First Grade Curriculum Highlights: In alignment with the Common Core Standards

English Language Arts Missouri Learning Standards Grade-Level Expectations

Opportunities for Writing Title Key Stage 1 Key Stage 2 Narrative

Loughton School s curriculum evening. 28 th February 2017

VIEW: An Assessment of Problem Solving Style

What the National Curriculum requires in reading at Y5 and Y6

How to Judge the Quality of an Objective Classroom Test

Individual Component Checklist L I S T E N I N G. for use with ONE task ENGLISH VERSION

Process to Identify Minimum Passing Criteria and Objective Evidence in Support of ABET EC2000 Criteria Fulfillment

Qualification Guidance

Author: Justyna Kowalczys Stowarzyszenie Angielski w Medycynie (PL) Feb 2015

Lecturing Module

Student Name: OSIS#: DOB: / / School: Grade:

Transcription:

Methodology to define the eight proficiency levels Translating each competence into sets of learning outcomes compatible to the 8 proficiency levels has been developed according to the methodology described below. We structured the updated 21 competences in eight levels of learning outcomes. Method followed to defined each proficiency level: o The levels were described through learning outcomes, each description contained terms of knowledge, skills and attitudes. Knowledge, skills and competences/attitudes were described in one single descriptor for each level of each competence. This equals to 168 descriptors (8 x 21 learning outcomes). o The leverage were understood as a ladder in the sense that from level 1 to level 8 the associated learning becomes more complex and makes greater demands on the learner or worker. Nevertheless, each level describes the outcomes of learning rather than stages of progression, there is no assumption that one level will be achieved before another. The descriptors are written to sufficiently distinguish between descriptors from the level below or the level above and show, from the previous level, distinct progress in dimensions of change (e.g. complexity of knowledge). In order to keep the table and the text as clear as possible, repetitions were avoided. o In order to achieve continuity and discreteness, key inspired by the European Qualification Framework (EQF) were identified and used to characterize levels each level (see Table 1). This was also a specific recommendation from external reviewers. In this sense, these key can also be understood as indicators of threshold levels. o Level 7 and 8 remained highly specialised knowledge and they are described using very abstract language.

Table 1: Key from EQF for each level Level Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Level 4 Level 5 Level 6 Level 7 Level 8 Main key Basic general Basic for simple tasks Direct supervision Basic factual Basic cognitive and practical for tasks and routine Supervision with autonomy (regular level of) knowledge Range of skills for tasks and Responsibility for tasks and adaptation to Factual and theoretical Range of skills for specific Self-management in predictable contexts, supervise routines of others and responsibility to evaluate and improve Comprehensive, specialised, factual and theoretical Comprehensive range of skills Management and supervision in unpredictable contexts Review and develop self and other Advanced and critical understanding Advanced skills Manage complexity and unpredictability; responsibility to develop others Highly specialised and critical awareness Specialised problem-solving Manage and transform in complexity and unpredictability and responsibility to review the performance of others Most advanced Most advanced and specialised Substantial authority, innovation, autonomy, scholarly, integrity and commitment Method followed to formulate descriptors: o The descriptors were deliberately written rather generic. To apply definite and concrete statements (e.g. avoiding terms like appropriate ) and at the same time to be as simple and generic as possible. o The descriptors reflected both specialisations and generalisations. o One learning outcome descriptor was included at each level encompassing the required knowledge, skills and attitudes. The main reason is to simplify the resulting framework. Currently, each level is more than the sum of the three parts that make it up creating a narrative with meaning. o We used only positive statements. o We avoided jargon.

Method followed to produce learning outcomes: o We started each learning outcome with an action verb, followed by the object of the verb followed by a phrase that gives the context: action verb + object + context. o In order to use correct action verbs, we used Bloom's Taxonomy (Bloom et al., 1956, 1964) in the version revised by Anderson et al., (2001 1 ). o We used only one verb per learning outcome. o We avoided vague terms like know, understand, learn, be familiar with, be exposed to, be acquainted with, and be aware of. o We used unambiguous action verbs as defined by Fry et al (2000) and related with outcomes and not aims o We try to include when possible learning outcomes that include or combine the three domains (cognitive, subjective and psychomotor). o We avoided complicated sentences, using when necessary more one than one sentence to ensure clarity. o We wrote observable and measurable learning outcomes, capable of being assessed. Lastly, we have matched the levels with levels of the revised Bloom taxonomy (Anderson et al., 2001) in order to identify action verbs and key for each level. The results are shown in the following grid (Table 2). This was used as a base to follow a systematic and homogeneous process to formulate the learning outcomes of each descriptor. 1 Anderson, L. W. and Krathwohl, D. R., et al (Eds..) (2001) A Taxonomy for Learning, Teaching, and Assessing: A Revision of Bloom s Taxonomy of Educational Objectives. Allyn & Bacon. Boston, MA (Pearson Education Group)

Table 2: Grid with correspondence between key inspired by EQF and Revised Blossom's Taxonomy Level Knowledge Skills Competence Main key ADJECTIVES Level 1 Basic general knowledge Remembering- Factual Basic skills required to carry out simple tasks Perception Work or study under direct supervision in a structured context Awareness and attention (Receiving) Basic general Basic for simple tasks Direct supervision Level 2 List (specific) Arrange, collect, define, describe, duplicate, enumerate, examine, find, identify, label, list, memorise, name, order, outline, present, quote, recall, recognise, recollect, record, recount, relate, repeat, reproduce, show, state, tabulate, tell. Basic factual knowledge of a field of work or study Remembering- Factual+Conceptual Choose, Describe, Detect, Differentiate, Distinguish, Identify, Isolate, Relate, select Basic cognitive and practical skills required to use relevant information in order to carry out tasks and to solve routine using simple rules and tools ask, choose, describe, follows, gives, holds, identifies, locates, names, points to, selects, shows interest, sits, erects, replies, uses Work or study under supervision with some autonomy Guided response Basic factual Basic cognitive and practical for tasks and routine Supervision with autonomy Level 3 Recognise Arrange, collect, define, describe, duplicate, enumerate, examine, find, identify, label, list, memorise, name, order, outline, present, quote, recall, recognise, recollect, record, recount, relate, repeat, reproduce, show, state, tabulate, tell. Knowledge of facts, principles, processes and general concepts, in a field of work or study Understanding - Factual + Conceptual+ Procedural A range of cognitive and practical skills required to accomplish tasks and solve by selecting and applying basic methods, tools, materials and information Copy, Trace, Follow, React, Repeat, Produce, Respond Take responsibility for completion of tasks in work or study; adapt own behaviour to circumstances in solving Active participation (responding) (regular level of) knowledge Range of skills for tasks and Responsibility for tasks and adaptation to

Level 4 Level 5 Summarise (specific) Classify (specific) Clarify (specific) Associate, change, clarify, classify, construct, contrast, convert, decode, defend, describe, differentiate, discriminate, discuss, distinguish, estimate, explain, express, extend, generalise, identify, illustrate, indicate, infer, interpret, locate, paraphrase, predict, recognise, report, restate, rewrite, review, select, solve, translate. Factual and theoretical knowledge in broad contexts within a field of work or study Understanding - Factual + Conceptual+ Procedural + Metacogn Predict (specific) Associate, change, clarify, classify, construct, contrast, convert, decode, defend, describe, differentiate, discriminate, discuss, distinguish, estimate, explain, express, extend, generalise, identify, illustrate, indicate, infer, interpret, locate, paraphrase, predict, recognise, report, restate, rewrite, review, select, solve, translate. Comprehensive, specialised, factual and theoretical knowledge within a field of work or study and an awareness of the boundaries of that knowledge Applying A range of cognitive and practical skills required to generate solutions to specific in a field of work or study A comprehensive range of cognitive and practical skills required to develop creative solutions to abstract Accept responsibility. answers, assists, aids, complies, conforms, discusses, enjoy, greets, helps, labels, obey, performs, practices, presents, reads, recites, reports, selects, tells, writes. Exercise self-management within the guidelines of work or study contexts that are usually predictable, but are subject to change; supervise the routine work of others, taking some responsibility for the evaluation and improvement of work or study activities Mechanism Assemble Construct Displays Fix Grind Heat Manipulate Measure Mend Mix organise Exercise management and supervision in contexts of work or study activities where there is unpredictable change; review and develop performance of self and others Valuing Factual and theoretical Range of skills for specific Self-management in predictable contexts, supervise routines of others and responsibility to evaluate and improve Comprehensive, specialised, factual and theoretical Comprehensive range of skills Management and supervision in unpredictable contexts Review and develop self and other

Level 6 Respond Provide Carry out Use Apply, assess, calculate, change, choose, complete, compute, construct, demonstrate, develop, discover, dramatise, employ, examine, experiment, find, illustrate, interpret, manipulate, modify, operate, organise, practice, predict, prepare, produce, relate, schedule, select, show, sketch, solve, transfer, use. Advanced knowledge of a field of work or study, involving a critical understanding of theories and principles Evaluating Advanced skills, demonstrating mastery and innovation, required to solve complex and unpredictable in a specialised field of work or study Adaptation Associate with, assume responsibility, believe in, be convinced, completes, describe, demonstrates, differentiates, explains, follows, forms, have faith in, initiates, invites, joins, justifies, participate, proposes, reads, reports, selects, shares, studies, subscribe to, works. Manage complex technical or professional activities or projects, taking responsibility for decisionmaking in unpredictable work or study contexts; take responsibility for managing professional development of individuals and groups Advanced and critical understanding Advanced skills Manage complexity and unpredictability; responsibility to develop others Level 7 [3] Check Determine Judge Reflect Appraise, ascertain, argue, assess, attach, choose, compare, conclude, contrast, convince, criticise, decide, defend, discriminate, explain, evaluate, grade, interpret, judge, justify, measure, predict, rate, recommend, relate, resolve. Highly specialised knowledge, some of which is at the forefront of knowledge in a field of work or study, as the basis for original thinking and/or research Critical awareness of knowledge issues in a field and at the interface between different fields Creating Adapt Alter Change Rearrange Reorganise Revise Varies Specialised problem-solving skills required in research and/or innovation in order to develop new knowledge and procedures and to integrate knowledge from different fields Origination Organising and prioritising Manage and transform work or study contexts that are complex, unpredictable and require new strategic approaches; take responsibility for contributing to professional knowledge and practice and/or for reviewing the strategic performance of teams Highly specialised and critical awareness Specialised problem-solving Manage and transform in complexity and unpredictability and responsibility to review the performance of others

Level 8 Generate Assemble Design Create categorizes, combines, compiles, composes, creates, devises, designs, explains, generates, modifies, organizes, plans, rearranges, reconstructs, relates, reorganizes, revises, rewrites, summarizes, tells, writes Knowledge at the most advanced frontier of a field of work or study and at the interface between fields Creating Arrange Build Combine Compose Construct Design Initiate Originate The most advanced and specialised skills and techniques, including synthesis and evaluation, required to solve critical in research and/or innovation and to extend and redefine existing knowledge or professional practice Adhere to, alter, arrange, classify, combines, compares, completes, defends, establish, explains, form judgements, formulates, generalizes, identifies with, integrates, modifies, orders, organizes, prepares, relates, synthesizes, weigh alternatives Internalising values Demonstrate substantial authority, innovation, autonomy, scholarly and professional integrity and sustained commitment to the development of new ideas or processes at the forefront of work or study contexts including research Most advanced Most advanced and specialised Substantial authority, innovation, autonomy, scholarly, integrity and commitment Generate Assemble Design Create categorizes, combines, compiles, composes, creates, devises, designs, explains, generates, modifies, organizes, plans, rearranges, reconstructs, relates, reorganizes, revises, rewrites, summarizes, tells, writes act, change behaviour, develop code of behaviour, develop philosophy, discriminate, display, influence, judge /issues, listen, modify, perform, practice, propose, qualify, question, revise, serve, show mature attitude, solve, verify.