Student Learning Assessment Accreditation

Similar documents
GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION

Mandatory Review of Social Skills Qualifications. Consultation document for Approval to List

Texas Woman s University Libraries

SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Process and Reports

Program Assessment and Alignment

Position Statements. Index of Association Position Statements

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

School Leadership Rubrics

University of Toronto Mississauga Degree Level Expectations. Preamble

Standards and Criteria for Demonstrating Excellence in BACCALAUREATE/GRADUATE DEGREE PROGRAMS

Quality in University Lifelong Learning (ULLL) and the Bologna process

Master of Science (MS) in Education with a specialization in. Leadership in Educational Administration

State of play of EQF implementation in Montenegro Zora Bogicevic, Ministry of Education Rajko Kosovic, VET Center

Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan,

ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES WITHIN ACADEMIC PROGRAMS AT WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY

Additional Qualification Course Guideline Computer Studies, Specialist

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

Document number: 2013/ Programs Committee 6/2014 (July) Agenda Item 42.0 Bachelor of Engineering with Honours in Software Engineering

Program Change Proposal:

ACCREDITATION STANDARDS

July 17, 2017 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL. John Tafaro, President Chatfield College State Route 251 St. Martin, OH Dear President Tafaro:

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF SCHOOLS (K 12)

Barstow Community College NON-INSTRUCTIONAL

Focus on. Learning THE ACCREDITATION MANUAL 2013 WASC EDITION

PEDAGOGY AND PROFESSIONAL RESPONSIBILITIES STANDARDS (EC-GRADE 12)

Purpose of internal assessment. Guidance and authenticity. Internal assessment. Assessment

SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

MODERNISATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAMMES IN THE FRAMEWORK OF BOLOGNA: ECTS AND THE TUNING APPROACH

ANNUAL CURRICULUM REVIEW PROCESS for the 2016/2017 Academic Year

NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Policy Manual

The Characteristics of Programs of Information

Referencing the Danish Qualifications Framework for Lifelong Learning to the European Qualifications Framework

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

Procedures for Academic Program Review. Office of Institutional Effectiveness, Academic Planning and Review

The University of North Carolina Strategic Plan Online Survey and Public Forums Executive Summary

What does Quality Look Like?

Kentucky s Standards for Teaching and Learning. Kentucky s Learning Goals and Academic Expectations

Self Assessment. InTech Collegiate High School. Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT

Developing an Assessment Plan to Learn About Student Learning

SURVEY RESEARCH POLICY TABLE OF CONTENTS STATEMENT OF POLICY REASON FOR THIS POLICY

Case of the Department of Biomedical Engineering at the Lebanese. International University

The ELA/ELD Framework Companion: a guide to assist in navigating the Framework

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS GUIDELINES

AIS KUWAIT. School Improvement Plan (SIP)

Orientation Workshop on Outcome Based Accreditation. May 21st, 2016

UNIVERSIDAD DEL ESTE Vicerrectoría Académica Vicerrectoría Asociada de Assessment Escuela de Ciencias y Tecnología

Greetings, Ed Morris Executive Director Division of Adult and Career Education Los Angeles Unified School District

PROPOSAL FOR NEW UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM. Institution Submitting Proposal. Degree Designation as on Diploma. Title of Proposed Degree Program

Indiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning. PBL Certification Process

Engaging Faculty in Reform:

University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences Programmatic Evaluation Plan

ABET Criteria for Accrediting Computer Science Programs

Revision and Assessment Plan for the Neumann University Core Experience

Davidson College Library Strategic Plan

INTERNATIONAL BACCALAUREATE AT IVANHOE GRAMMAR SCHOOL. An Introduction to the International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme For Students and Families

Results In. Planning Questions. Tony Frontier Five Levers to Improve Learning 1

Multidisciplinary Engineering Systems 2 nd and 3rd Year College-Wide Courses

Presentation of the English Montreal School Board To Mme Michelle Courchesne, Ministre de l Éducation, du Loisir et du Sport on

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd. Hertfordshire International College

Baku Regional Seminar in a nutshell

TEACHING QUALITY: SKILLS. Directive Teaching Quality Standard Applicable to the Provision of Basic Education in Alberta

A Strategic Plan for the Law Library. Washington and Lee University School of Law Introduction

DRAFT Strategic Plan INTERNAL CONSULTATION DOCUMENT. University of Waterloo. Faculty of Mathematics

eportfolio Guide Missouri State University

Curricular Reviews: Harvard, Yale & Princeton. DUE Meeting

Lincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal

PERFORMING ARTS. Unit 2 Proposal for a commissioning brief Suite. Cambridge TECHNICALS LEVEL 3. L/507/6467 Guided learning hours: 60

Curriculum Assessment Employing the Continuous Quality Improvement Model in Post-Certification Graduate Athletic Training Education Programs

Introduction: SOCIOLOGY AND PHILOSOPHY

Assessment of Student Academic Achievement

Personal Project. IB Guide: Project Aims and Objectives 2 Project Components... 3 Assessment Criteria.. 4 External Moderation.. 5

Digital Media Literacy

Guidelines for the Use of the Continuing Education Unit (CEU)

Goal #1 Promote Excellence and Expand Current Graduate and Undergraduate Programs within CHHS

PROGRAM PRESENTATION

Physics/Astronomy/Physical Science. Program Review

San Diego State University Division of Undergraduate Studies Sustainability Center Sustainability Center Assistant Position Description

Developing a Comprehensive Assessment Plan: Lessons Learned

EDUCATION AND DECENTRALIZATION

Core Values Engagement and Recommendations October 20, 2016

College of Business University of South Florida St. Petersburg Governance Document As Amended by the College Faculty on February 10, 2014

VOL VISION 2020 STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION

Use the Canvas mail to contact me for class matters so correspondence is consistent and documented.

Assumption University Five-Year Strategic Plan ( )

VTCT Level 3 Award in Education and Training

Arts, Literature and Communication (500.A1)

APPENDIX A-13 PERIODIC MULTI-YEAR REVIEW OF FACULTY & LIBRARIANS (PMYR) UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL

Minutes of the one hundred and thirty-eighth meeting of the Accreditation Committee held on Tuesday 2 December 2014.

Title Columbus State Community College's Master Planning Project (Phases III and IV) Status COMPLETED

Strategic Plan Revised November 2012 Reviewed and Updated July 2014

Michigan State University

Analyzing Linguistically Appropriate IEP Goals in Dual Language Programs

NC Global-Ready Schools

Post-Master s Certificate in. Leadership for Higher Education

ELA Grade 4 Literary Heroes Technology Integration Unit

Standard IV: Students

LAW ON HIGH SCHOOL. C o n t e n t s

School Inspection in Hesse/Germany

General study plan for third-cycle programmes in Sociology

Transcription:

Student Learning Assessment Accreditation Among the public s many expectations of higher education, the most basic is THAT STUDENTS WILL LEARN, And in particular that they will learn WHAT THEY NEED TO KNOW TO ATTAIN PERSONAL SUCCESS AND FULFILL THEIR PUBLIC RESPONSIBILITIES IN A GLOBAL AND DIVERSE SOCIETY.* * Higher Learning Commission draft document: Assessment Student LearningMarch07 http://hlcommission.org/index.php?option=com_docman&task=cat_view&gid=79&itemid=236

Student learning is CENTRAL to all higher education organizations

Continuous Quality Improvement CQM FORD Q-1 CQI CCQI QS-9000 DEMING CYCLE ISO-9000 SIX SIGMA ASSESSMENT TQM

Six Fundamental Questions Based On: Mission Evidence Analysis Responsibility Improvement Informing

How are your stated student learning outcomes appropriate to your mission, programs, degrees, and students?

What evidence do you have that students achieve your stated learning outcomes?

In what ways do you analyze and use evidence of student learning?

How do you ensure shared responsibility for student learning and for assessment of student learning?

How do you evaluate and improve the effectiveness of your efforts to assess and improve student learning?

In what ways do you inform the public and other stakeholders about what and how well your students are learning?

Effective assessment of student learning is a matter of commitment, not a matter of compliance. We assess student learning in meaningful, useful, and workable ways to evaluate how students are achieving their commitments and to act on the results in ways that advance student learning and improve educational quality.

Evaluate efforts to assess and improve student learning------- Criteria And Core Components

Criteria for accreditation Criterion One: MISSION and INTEGRITY. The organization operates with integrity to ensure the fulfillment of its mission through structures and processes that involve the board, administration, faculty, staff, and students.

Core components of Criterion One 1.a The organization s mission documents are clear and articulate publicly the organization s commitments. 1.b In its mission documents, the organization recognizes the diversity of its learners, other constituencies, and the greater society it serves. 1.c Understanding of and support for the mission pervade the organization. 1.d The organization s governance and administrative structures promote effective leadership and support collaborative processes that enable the organization to fulfill its mission. 1.e The organization upholds and protects its integrity.

Criteria for accreditation Criterion Two: PREPARING FOR THE FUTURE. The organization s allocation of resources and its processes for evaluation and planning demonstrate its capacity to fulfill its mission, improve the quality of its education, and respond to future challenges and opportunities.

Core Components of Criterion Two: 2a. The organization realistically prepares for a future shaped by multiple societal and economic trends. 2b. The organization s resource base supports its educational programs and its plans for maintaining and strengthening their quality in the future. 2c. The organization s ongoing evaluation and assessment processes provide reliable evidence of institutional effectiveness that clearly inform strategies for continuous improvement. 2d. All levels of planning align with the organization s mission, thereby enhancing its capacity to fulfill that mission.

Criterion for accreditation Criterion Three: STUDENT LEARNING and EFFECTIVE TEACHING. The organization provides evidence of student learning and teaching effectiveness that demonstrates it is fulfilling its educational mission.

Core Components of Criterion Three: 3a. The organization s goals for student learning outcomes are clearly stated for each educational program and make effective assessment possible. 3b. The organization values and supports effective teaching. 3c. The organization creates effective learning environments. 3d. The organization s learning resources support student learning and effective teaching.

Criteria for accreditation: Criterion Four: ACQUISITION, DISCOVERY, and APPLICATION OF KNOWLEDGE. The organization promotes a life of learning for its faculty, administration, staff, and students by fostering and supporting inquiry, creativity, practice, and social responsibility in ways consistent with its mission.

Core Components of Criterion Four: 4a. The organization demonstrates, through the actions of its board, administrators, students, faculty, and staff, that it values a life of learning. 4b. The organization demonstrates that acquisition of a breadth of knowledge and skills and the exercise of intellectual inquiry are integral to its educational programs. 4c. The organization assesses the usefulness of its curricula to students who will live and work in a global, diverse, and technological society. 4d. The organization provides support to ensure that faculty, students, and staff acquire, discover, and apply knowledge responsibly.

Criteria for accreditation Criterion Five: ENGAGEMENT and SERVICE. As called for by its mission, the organization identifies its constituencies and serves them in ways both value.

Core Components of Criterion Five: 5a. The organization learns from the constituencies it serves and analyzes its capacity to serve their needs and expectations. 5b. The organization has the capacity and the commitment to engage with its identified constituencies and communities. 5c. The organization demonstrates its responsiveness to those constituencies that depend on it for service. 5d. Internal and external constituencies value the services the organization provides.

Closing the Loop Mission Programs Degrees Students Evaluate Analyze Plan Teach Acquire Evidence Teach ANNOUNCE RESULTS AND IMPROVEMENTS Acquire Evidence Evaluate Make Changes (Plan) Analyze Use Findings