Writing Student Learning Outcomes

Similar documents
Analysis: Evaluation: Knowledge: Comprehension: Synthesis: Application:

Maximizing Learning Through Course Alignment and Experience with Different Types of Knowledge

Taxonomy of the cognitive domain: An example of architectural education program

Grade 4. Common Core Adoption Process. (Unpacked Standards)

Florida Reading for College Success

Secondary English-Language Arts

Classroom Connections Examining the Intersection of the Standards for Mathematical Content and the Standards for Mathematical Practice

ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES WITHIN ACADEMIC PROGRAMS AT WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY

Professional Learning Suite Framework Edition Domain 3 Course Index

Outcome Based Education 15/01/2012

PEDAGOGICAL LEARNING WALKS: MAKING THE THEORY; PRACTICE

5. UPPER INTERMEDIATE

The Political Engagement Activity Student Guide

SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Process and Reports

Lecturing Module

Researcher Development Assessment A: Knowledge and intellectual abilities

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT If sub mission ins not a book, cite appropriate location(s))

Copyright Corwin 2015

Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education

Designing a Rubric to Assess the Modelling Phase of Student Design Projects in Upper Year Engineering Courses

Ohio s New Learning Standards: K-12 World Languages

Scoring Guide for Candidates For retake candidates who began the Certification process in and earlier.

Disciplinary Literacy in Science

San Diego State University Division of Undergraduate Studies Sustainability Center Sustainability Center Assistant Position Description

EQuIP Review Feedback

Indicators Teacher understands the active nature of student learning and attains information about levels of development for groups of students.

Proposing New CSU Degree Programs Bachelor s and Master s Levels. Offered through Self-Support and State-Support Modes

Grade 11 Language Arts (2 Semester Course) CURRICULUM. Course Description ENGLISH 11 (2 Semester Course) Duration: 2 Semesters Prerequisite: None

Full text of O L O W Science As Inquiry conference. Science as Inquiry

Strands & Standards Reference Guide for World Languages

The College Board Redesigned SAT Grade 12

Rendezvous with Comet Halley Next Generation of Science Standards

Arizona s English Language Arts Standards th Grade ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

Writing Effective Program Learning Outcomes. Deborah Panter, J.D. Director of Educational Effectiveness & Assessment

Dublin City Schools Broadcast Video I Graded Course of Study GRADES 9-12

THINKING SKILLS, STUDENT ENGAGEMENT BRAIN-BASED LEARNING LOOKING THROUGH THE EYES OF THE LEARNER AND SCHEMA ACTIVATOR ENGAGEMENT POINT

CORRELATION FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS CORRELATION COURSE STANDARDS / BENCHMARKS. 1 of 16

Developing an Assessment Plan to Learn About Student Learning

This Performance Standards include four major components. They are

Language Acquisition Chart

Kentucky s Standards for Teaching and Learning. Kentucky s Learning Goals and Academic Expectations

Additional Qualification Course Guideline Computer Studies, Specialist

Developing a Language for Assessing Creativity: a taxonomy to support student learning and assessment

An Analysis of the Early Assessment Program (EAP) Assessment for English

English Language Arts Missouri Learning Standards Grade-Level Expectations

Syllabus Education Department Lincoln University EDU 311 Social Studies Methods

Developing Students Research Proposal Design through Group Investigation Method

Document number: 2013/ Programs Committee 6/2014 (July) Agenda Item 42.0 Bachelor of Engineering with Honours in Software Engineering

Analyzing Linguistically Appropriate IEP Goals in Dual Language Programs

Purpose of internal assessment. Guidance and authenticity. Internal assessment. Assessment

Biome I Can Statements

Beyond the Blend: Optimizing the Use of your Learning Technologies. Bryan Chapman, Chapman Alliance

Rubric for Scoring English 1 Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis

AGS THE GREAT REVIEW GAME FOR PRE-ALGEBRA (CD) CORRELATED TO CALIFORNIA CONTENT STANDARDS

Facing our Fears: Reading and Writing about Characters in Literary Text

Oakland Unified School District English/ Language Arts Course Syllabus

APPLICATION PROCEDURES

A Systematic Approach to Programmatic Assessment

MBA 510: Critical Thinking for Managers

Automating Outcome Based Assessment

1/25/2012. Common Core Georgia Performance Standards Grade 4 English Language Arts. Andria Bunner Sallie Mills ELA Program Specialists

Note: Principal version Modification Amendment Modification Amendment Modification Complete version from 1 October 2014

Protocol for using the Classroom Walkthrough Observation Instrument

George Mason University Graduate School of Education Education Leadership Program. Course Syllabus Spring 2006

CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

Exemplar Grade 9 Reading Test Questions

Promoting Active Learning in University Classes

Reading Grammar Section and Lesson Writing Chapter and Lesson Identify a purpose for reading W1-LO; W2- LO; W3- LO; W4- LO; W5-

Update on Standards and Educator Evaluation

Course Syllabus Art History I ARTS 1303

Program Matrix - Reading English 6-12 (DOE Code 398) University of Florida. Reading

Sample Performance Assessment

Aligning learning, teaching and assessment using the web: an evaluation of pedagogic approaches

Correspondence between the DRDP (2015) and the California Preschool Learning Foundations. Foundations (PLF) in Language and Literacy

Learning Disability Functional Capacity Evaluation. Dear Doctor,

STUDENT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION AND PROMOTION

Candidates must achieve a grade of at least C2 level in each examination in order to achieve the overall qualification at C2 Level.

Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011: 20. Faculty member completing template: Molly Dugan (Date: 1/26/2012)

Sample from: 'State Studies' Product code: STP550 The entire product is available for purchase at STORYPATH.

FIGURE IT OUT! MIDDLE SCHOOL TASKS. Texas Performance Standards Project

Course INTRODUCTION TO DEGREE PROGRAM EXPECTATIONS: WHAT FACULTY NEED TO KNOW NOW

ABET Criteria for Accrediting Computer Science Programs

Florida Reading Endorsement Alignment Matrix Competency 1

Assessment for Student Learning: Institutional-level Assessment Board of Trustees Meeting, August 23, 2016

Statewide Framework Document for:

CREATING SAFE AND INCLUSIVE SCHOOLS: A FRAMEWORK FOR SELF-ASSESSMENT. Created by: Great Lakes Equity Center

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS GUIDELINES

NC Global-Ready Schools

Maths Games Resource Kit - Sample Teaching Problem Solving

USING LEARNING THEORY IN A HYPERMEDIA-BASED PETRI NET MODELING TUTORIAL

Common Core Exemplar for English Language Arts and Social Studies: GRADE 1

Guest Editorial Motivating Growth of Mathematics Knowledge for Teaching: A Case for Secondary Mathematics Teacher Education

Observing Teachers: The Mathematics Pedagogy of Quebec Francophone and Anglophone Teachers

Master s Programme in European Studies

Program in Linguistics. Academic Year Assessment Report

ELS LanguagE CEntrES CurriCuLum OvErviEw & PEDagOgiCaL PhiLOSOPhy

Prentice Hall Literature Common Core Edition Grade 10, 2012

Oakland Unified School District English/ Language Arts Course Syllabus

eportfolio Guide Missouri State University

Transcription:

Writing Student Learning Outcomes

What are PLOs, SLOs, and EEOs? PLO The Palestinian Liberation Organization? Program Leaning Outcomes! SLO The Symbionese Liberation Organization? Student Learning Outcomes! EEO Equal Employment Opportunity? Exemplary Educational Objectives!

Alignment of Outcomes Institutional Mission & Strategic Initiatives Programmatic Outcomes Student Learning Outcomes

What are Student Learning Outcomes? Formal statements that articulate: The knowledge, skills/abilities, and attributes we want our students to be able to demonstrate. From their learning experiences both curricular and co-curricular activities. Objectives vs. Outcomes Process/Fluid

Characteristics of SLOs They should be: Based on PLOs Collaborative Learner centered Specific Action oriented Cognitively appropriate Behavioral Measurable Observable Understandable Achievable Realistic

Learning Outcomes Formula Verb Or Action Phrase + In Order To Why? = Great Learning Outcomes OR What students need to know? Student identifies, consults and evaluates reference books appropriate to the topic In Order To Why do they need to know this? locate background information and statistics.

Importance of Verbs Bloom s Taxonomy Affective Domain This domain includes the manner in which we deal with things emotionally, such as feelings, values, appreciation, enthusiasms, motivations, and attitudes. Psychomotor Domain The psychomotor domain includes physical movement, coordination, and use of the motor-skill areas. Development of these skills requires practice and is measured in terms of speed, precision, distance, procedures, or techniques in execution. Cognitive Domain The cognitive domain involves knowledge and the development of intellectual skills. This includes the recall or recognition of specific facts, procedural patterns, and concepts that serve in the development of intellectual abilities and skills. There are six major categories, which are listed in order below, starting from the simplest behavior to the most complex. The categories can be thought of as degrees of difficulties.

Cognitive Domain Involves knowledge and the development of intellectual skills Hierarchy of objectives according to cognitive complexity Higher-level objectives include, and are dependant on lower level cognitive skills

Bloom s Taxonomy

Bloom s Lower Levels Knowledge Recalling previously learned information such as facts, terminology, rules, etc. Answers may be memorized or closely paraphrased from assigned material. Define, list, name, recall

Bloom s Lower Levels Comprehension Ability to comprehend the meaning of material. Answers must be in the student s own words while still using terminology appropriate to the course material. Explain, summarize, distinguish between, restate

Bloom s Lower Levels Demonstrate rote or surface learning Declarative or Procedural Knowledge Answers found in the assigned materials 80% of HS teachers test at these levels

Bloom s Higher Levels Application Requires recognizing, identifying, or applying a concept or principle in a new situation or solving a new problem. May require identifying or generating examples not found in assigned materials. Demonstrate, arrange, relate, adapt

Bloom s Higher Levels Analysis Ability to break material down into its component parts and to understand its underlying structure May require students to compare and contrast or explain how an example illustrates a given concept or principle. Require students to identify logical errors or to differentiate among facts, opinions, assumptions, hypotheses and conclusions Expected to draw relationships between ideas Differentiate, estimate, infer, diagram

Bloom s Higher Levels Synthesis Opposite of Analysis Ability to combine parts to form a new whole; to synthesize a variety of elements into an original and significant whole. Produce something unique or original Solve some unfamiliar problem in a unique way Combine, create, formulate, construct

Bloom s Higher Levels Evaluation Ability to evaluate a total situation, to judge the value of material for a certain purpose, combining elements of all the other categories and also value judgments based on defined, fixed criteria. The most important part of the answer is the justification and rationale for the conclusion Judge, critique, justify, discriminate

Bloom s Higher Levels Meaningful or deep learning Go beyond textual material in that they must be inferred or extrapolated from the material in the assigned material. Students creativity, originality and critical thinking is required at higher levels More authentic than lower levels Thinking at this level is more likely to represent types of performances required in the real world

Questions for Assessment 1. What do you want the student to be able to do? (Outcome) 2. What does the student need to know in order to do this well? (Curriculum) 3. What activity will facilitate the learning? (Pedagogy) 4. How will the student demonstrate the learning? (Assessment) 5. How will I know the student has done this well? (Criteria)

What do you want the student to be able to do? This question asks you to develop the outcome. For Example: Student identifies, consults and evaluates reference books appropriate to the topic in order to locate background information and statistics.

Example 1 Students will name the three types of rock in order to differentiate among the three. Students will compare and contrast the characteristics of the three types of rocks in order to differentiate among the three.

Example 2 Students will be able to use Excel. Given a sample dataset, students will use Excel to create a spreadsheet that incorporates simple mathematical formulas.

Example 3 Students will analyze global political systems. Students will analyze 20th century western democracies and responsibilities of citizens in those democracies.

Example 4 Students will construct bibliographies and in-text references using discipline appropriate styles in order to contribute to academic discourse in their discipline. Construct bibliographies and in-text references using discipline appropriate styles in order to correctly attribute others' work and ideas.

Write an SLO What does the student need to know? Why do they need to know this?

What Do I Do With SLOs? Put them in your Syllabus. Assessment them as part of your course. Report the assessment if necessary. Use the information to improve your class.

The Assessment Process: Plan-Do-Review 1. Establish goals and missions For courses and programs 6. Use results to refine instruction (close the feedback loop) Student Learning 2. Write intended Student Learning Outcomes (SLO s) 5. Evaluate assessment results 4. Incorporate SLO s and assessment tasks into instruction 3. Develop means of assessment and criteria for success for evaluating SLO s

Why Assess? Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Principles of Accreditation Core Requirement 2.5 The institution engages in ongoing, integrated, and institution-wide research-based planning and evaluation processes that incorporate a systematic review of programs and services that (a) results in continuing improvement, and (b) demonstrates that the institution is effectively accomplishing its mission. Comprehensive Standard 3.3.1 The institution identifies expected outcomes for its educational programs and its administrative and educational support services; assesses whether it achieves these outcomes; and provides evidence of improvement based on analysis of those results.

Why Assess? Improves students learning. Identifies instructional, course, or assignment challenges. Improves instruction by identifying what instructional adjustments might be needed. Ensures grading is reflective of students learning towards course objectives. Makes grading more systematic and objective.