We selected the following instruments to collect data regarding Student Achievement:

Similar documents
Geographic Area - Englewood

ISD 2184, Luverne Public Schools. xcvbnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcv. Local Literacy Plan bnmqwertyuiopasdfghjklzxcvbn

Kannapolis Charter Academy

Mooresville Charter Academy

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

Colorado s Unified Improvement Plan for Schools for Online UIP Report

Aimsweb Fluency Norms Chart

School Performance Plan Middle Schools

The Oregon Literacy Framework of September 2009 as it Applies to grades K-3

Rhyne Elementary School Improvement Plan Rhyne Elementary School Contact Information

Strategic Improvement Plan

Linking the Ohio State Assessments to NWEA MAP Growth Tests *

and secondary sources, attending to such features as the date and origin of the information.

4.0 CAPACITY AND UTILIZATION

Rhyne Elementary School Improvement Plan

How To: Structure Classroom Data Collection for Individual Students

Content Language Objectives (CLOs) August 2012, H. Butts & G. De Anda

Effectiveness of McGraw-Hill s Treasures Reading Program in Grades 3 5. October 21, Research Conducted by Empirical Education Inc.

Executive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY

Robert Bennis Elementary School

National Standards for Foreign Language Education

PSYC 620, Section 001: Traineeship in School Psychology Fall 2016

SAT Results December, 2002 Authors: Chuck Dulaney and Roger Regan WCPSS SAT Scores Reach Historic High

Cuero Independent School District

Description of Program Report Codes Used in Expenditure of State Funds

SY School Performance Plan

Alpha provides an overall measure of the internal reliability of the test. The Coefficient Alphas for the STEP are:

STUDENT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION AND PROMOTION

Test Blueprint. Grade 3 Reading English Standards of Learning

World s Best Workforce Plan

Sidney Sawyer Elementary School

School Action Plan: Template Overview

Geographic Area - Englewood

Number of Items and Test Administration Times IDEA English Language Proficiency Tests/ North Carolina Testing Program.

AIS/RTI Mathematics. Plainview-Old Bethpage

Alvin Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

Omak School District WAVA K-5 Learning Improvement Plan

DAS-REMI District Accountability System Reporting, Evaluating, and Monitoring Instrument for the P2E2020SBP

TEKS Resource System. Effective Planning from the IFD & Assessment. Presented by: Kristin Arterbury, ESC Region 12

Cooper Upper Elementary School

1110 Main Street, East Hartford, CT Tel: (860) Fax: (860)

INSTRUCTIONAL FOCUS DOCUMENT Grade 5/Science

International School of Kigali, Rwanda

Kindergarten Foundations of America

Learning Microsoft Office Excel

Implementing an Early Warning Intervention and Monitoring System to Keep Students On Track in the Middle Grades and High School

Positive Learning Environment

Scholastic Leveled Bookroom

2016 Annual Report 1

Georgia Department of Education

Newburgh Enlarged City School District Academic. Academic Intervention Services Plan

Algebra 1, Quarter 3, Unit 3.1. Line of Best Fit. Overview

Juvenile Detention Alternatives Initiative Inter-site Conference. Improving Conditions in Detention Centers: Recent Innovations New Incentive System

Special Education Services Program/Service Descriptions

Criterion Met? Primary Supporting Y N Reading Street Comprehensive. Publisher Citations

Port Jervis City School District Academic Intervention Services (AIS) Plan

OVERVIEW OF CURRICULUM-BASED MEASUREMENT AS A GENERAL OUTCOME MEASURE

Ready Common Core Ccls Answer Key

Kahului Elementary School

Diploma in Library and Information Science (Part-Time) - SH220

EFFECTS OF MATHEMATICS ACCELERATION ON ACHIEVEMENT, PERCEPTION, AND BEHAVIOR IN LOW- PERFORMING SECONDARY STUDENTS

Port Jefferson Union Free School District. Response to Intervention (RtI) and Academic Intervention Services (AIS) PLAN

State of New Jersey

Elementary Campus Improvement Plan: School Based Improvement Committee Skaggs Elementary. Principal: Jamey J. Allen

Alief Independent School District Liestman Elementary Goals/Performance Objectives

Fieldwork Practice Manual- AHSC 435

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

Manchester Essex Regional Schools District Improvement Plan Three Year Plan

Manasquan Elementary School State Proficiency Assessments. Spring 2012 Results

Statistical Peers for Benchmarking 2010 Supplement Grade 11 Including Charter Schools NMSBA Performance 2010

Charles de Gaulle European High School, setting its sights firmly on Europe.

CLASSIFICATION OF PROGRAM Critical Elements Analysis 1. High Priority Items Phonemic Awareness Instruction

Harriet Beecher Stowe Elementary School

Getting Results Continuous Improvement Plan

JOB OUTLOOK 2018 NOVEMBER 2017 FREE TO NACE MEMBERS $52.00 NONMEMBER PRICE NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES AND EMPLOYERS

success. It will place emphasis on:

ROSETTA STONE PRODUCT OVERVIEW

Fourth Grade. Reporting Student Progress. Libertyville School District 70. Fourth Grade

School Year 2017/18. DDS MySped Application SPECIAL EDUCATION. Training Guide

Writing a Basic Assessment Report. CUNY Office of Undergraduate Studies

Anxiety Social Emotional Goals For Iep

The Effects of Super Speed 100 on Reading Fluency. Jennifer Thorne. University of New England

DELAWARE CHARTER SCHOOL ANNUAL REPORT

Review of Student Assessment Data

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School, Grades 9-12

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity

Sight Word Assessment

School Performance Plan Middle/High Schools

TIMSS Highlights from the Primary Grades

Whole School Literacy Policy 2017/18

GRANT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL School Improvement Plan

Second Step Suite and the Whole School, Whole Community, Whole Child (WSCC) Model

EAL Train the Trainer Course New dates: 31 st January 1 st February 2018

LEAP Gifted and Talented Pilot at Highland Elementary School. Principal Michele Dewitt Director of Teaching and Learning Zena Stenvik

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

PROGRESS MONITORING FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES Participant Materials

John F. Kennedy Middle School

Unit: Human Impact Differentiated (Tiered) Task How Does Human Activity Impact Soil Erosion?

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

Transcription:

Existing School Data: Student Data Data collection Instruments We selected the following instruments to collect data regarding Student Achievement: Text Level mclass Reading 3D (TRC) NWEA (K-2 nd Grades) Local Assessments: STAR Reading Assessment (1 st 2 nd Grades) STAR Early Literacy for Kindergarten Attendance Rate Triangulation of Data Goal #1 Data Point 1 Text Levels Amplify mclass Reading 3D (TRC) Goal #1 All students will improve their reading comprehension Data Point 2 Data Point 3 NWEA (K-2) STAR Reading Test from Accelerated Reader

Analysis of Data Standardized Tests (STAR and NWEA) In grades K-2 NWEA standardized test results indicate that in the areas of reading comprehension and vocabulary, students are achieving at or above the targeted RIT score. However, our corporation goal is that 80% of our students, in grades K-2, will meet or exceed the expected RIT score given for NWEA by the end of grade 2. Our data indicates that we are meeting this goal in K and 1 st grade. Second grade is a little below the expected level. The data leads us to believe that our focus for improvement should be in the areas of vocabulary development and informational text comprehension. New high stakes testing will be stressing the understanding of informational text and we will emphasize that more in our professional development for our Goal 1. Analysis of Data: In 2013, upon the review of the test data, concern was registered in the areas of vocabulary and reading comprehension with emphasis on informational text. Students are consistently scoring lower in these language areas than math, leading us to choose reading comprehension as our targeted goal. Analysis involved comparing students scores with the scores of students achieving a median or above RIT score with the expected achievement score on the NWEA test. We also reviewed our local STAR reading assessment. This assessment for comprehension places high emphasis on vocabulary knowledge. The scores indicated that less than 80% of the students, grades 1 & 2, are reading at or above grade level in the spring. Our 2013-2015 comprehension goal is based on increasing the number of students scoring at expected or above RIT scores and text levels. In regards to attendance, our data shows that we have been slightly below the state average for last 3 years and do not see that attendance is adversely affecting standardized test scores. This indicates that test scores should be valid indicators because most students attend school regularly. When the text level data was disaggregrated by SES and Special Education, our findings showed that Kindergarten and First Grade scored below the expect level. Second Grade showed that interventions used are successfully helping our students close the gap and become more proficienct in reading. The gender graph showed that there was not a significant difference in text level proficiency.

Name and Description of Assessments (Graphs following) STAR Reading Assessment - Computer-based tests given throughout the year to measure reading comprehension and to determine the student s reading level in First and Second Grade. STAR Early Literacy Assessment is used in Kindergarten and First Grade in the fall. STAR Early Literacy Assesses students early literacy skills in preparation for reading. NWEA - Standardized diagnostic tool given at the beginning, middle and end of the year. This information is used to differentiate instruction to meet students academic needs, corporation goals, and state goals as well as measure growth and achievement. Text Level Amplify - mclass Reading 3D (TRC)

Presentation of Data: Existing School Data Using STAR The STAR reading test is given to the first and second grade students. The data from the STAR test shows that our students at Rose Hamilton are meeting or exceeding the expected reading level. The expected level in first grade at the end of the year is 1.8 and our students in 2013-2015 were at 1.8 or higher in the spring. The expected level in second grade at the end of the year is 2.8 and our students in 2013-2015 were at 3.2 or higher. However, there is some indication that students had summer regression in 2012-2013 for both first and second grade, and 2013-2014 for second grade, when they scored lower than expected on the Pre-Test of STAR.

Presentation of Data: Existing School Data Using STAR Early Literacy Beginning in the fall of 2012 Kindergarten students were given the STAR Early Literacy Test (SEL). The reading test is given at the beginning, middle and end of the year. The data from the SEL test shows that our students at Rose Hamilton are exceeding the expected skill level. The expected level at the end of the year is 600 and our students were at 618 or above in the spring each year.

Testing using NWEA Reading Assessment reveals that Kindergarten (which takes the test in the winter and spring) was above the expected RIT level for 2012-2015. First grade was above the expected level for both pre and post test scores in 2012-2015. Second grade was below the expected level for pre-test scores in years 2012. However, in 2012-2015, they were above the expected level for post test. The post test scores were above the expected level each year.

Key: Grade KG Grade 1 Grade 2 Expected Text Level for Pre Test N/A C J Expected Text Level for Post Test C I M The students text level is determined by using Amplify mclass Reading TRC. Each student in grades K 2 has text level assessments in the Fall, Winter and Spring. The exception is Kindergarten, who only record the results in Winter and Spring. There is not an expected text level for students entering Kindergarten. The data from this graph shows the average student text level for each grade was lower than the expected level for the years 2012-2015. Even though the data from the graph shows that the percentage of students meeting the expected text levels on pre and post test are lower than the 80% expected, students are showing growth between pre and post testing.

Each grade level at Rose Hamilton Elementary School chooses and teaches content area vocabulary words. Strategies for increasing student vocabulary are from Building Academic Vocabulary: Teacher s Manual, by Marzano and Pickering. Our data indicates that the average student score for grades K 2 is at expected or above above average growth between pre and post testing, with the exception of second grade in 2015. Rose Hamilton Elementary charts the average monthly attendance for the entire school year. The data shows that the average attendance for the school years from 2013 to 2015 ranged from at expected to slightly below the state average.

Disaggregated Data using SES, Gender and Special Eucation

Analysis of disaggregated data: The three graphs above show the breakdown of mclass TRC (Text Reading Levels) according to SES (Social Economic Status), Gender and Special Education students. In the first graph showing SES, it shows that we are closing the gap between expected text level from Kindergarten to Second Grade. In Gender, girls score slightly higher than boys in first and second grade and slightly below in Kindergarten. Our data shows that Gender does not make much difference as far as students reading at expected text level. Data shows that students in Kindergarten and First Grade scored well below the expected text level in Special Education. Students in the Second Grade made a significant gain in text level proficiency. The data shows a stead growth and closing of the gap from Kindergarten to Second Grade. We attribute this growth to the many interventions that are in place to improve their literacy skills while here at Rose Hamiliton.