Chapter 7. More on Words. Universal Stages of Growth. Really Universal? Current Questions. Lexical Development across languages LDER

Similar documents
Correspondence between the DRDP (2015) and the California Preschool Learning Foundations. Foundations (PLF) in Language and Literacy

Early vocabulary and gestures in Estonian children*

Writing a composition

English for Life. B e g i n n e r. Lessons 1 4 Checklist Getting Started. Student s Book 3 Date. Workbook. MultiROM. Test 1 4

NAME: East Carolina University PSYC Developmental Psychology Dr. Eppler & Dr. Ironsmith

ELA/ELD Standards Correlation Matrix for ELD Materials Grade 1 Reading

I. INTRODUCTION. for conducting the research, the problems in teaching vocabulary, and the suitable

YMCA SCHOOL AGE CHILD CARE PROGRAM PLAN

IMPLEMENTING THE EARLY YEARS LEARNING FRAMEWORK

Language Acquisition Chart

Sample Goals and Benchmarks

Age Effects on Syntactic Control in. Second Language Learning

Tracy Dudek & Jenifer Russell Trinity Services, Inc. *Copyright 2008, Mark L. Sundberg

CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

Elizabeth R. Crais, Ph.D., CCC-SLP

Course Outline for Honors Spanish II Mrs. Sharon Koller

West Windsor-Plainsboro Regional School District Spanish 2

Subject: Opening the American West. What are you teaching? Explorations of Lewis and Clark

Teachers: Use this checklist periodically to keep track of the progress indicators that your learners have displayed.

Full text of O L O W Science As Inquiry conference. Science as Inquiry

Opportunities for Writing Title Key Stage 1 Key Stage 2 Narrative

The College Board Redesigned SAT Grade 12

5 th Grade Language Arts Curriculum Map

Aspectual Classes of Verb Phrases

FOREWORD.. 5 THE PROPER RUSSIAN PRONUNCIATION. 8. УРОК (Unit) УРОК (Unit) УРОК (Unit) УРОК (Unit) 4 80.

Literacy THE KEYS TO SUCCESS. Tips for Elementary School Parents (grades K-2)

Organizing Comprehensive Literacy Assessment: How to Get Started

Student Name: OSIS#: DOB: / / School: Grade:

1 st Quarter (September, October, November) August/September Strand Topic Standard Notes Reading for Literature

1.2 Interpretive Communication: Students will demonstrate comprehension of content from authentic audio and visual resources.

Formulaic Language and Fluency: ESL Teaching Applications

Monticello Community School District K 12th Grade. Spanish Standards and Benchmarks

The Effect of Extensive Reading on Developing the Grammatical. Accuracy of the EFL Freshmen at Al Al-Bayt University

The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages p. 58 to p. 82

Cambridgeshire Community Services NHS Trust: delivering excellence in children and young people s health services

ROSETTA STONE PRODUCT OVERVIEW

Author: Fatima Lemtouni, Wayzata High School, Wayzata, MN

Myths, Legends, Fairytales and Novels (Writing a Letter)

Approaches to control phenomena handout Obligatory control and morphological case: Icelandic and Basque

Daily Language Review Grade 5 Answers

Intermediate Academic Writing

Dyslexia/dyslexic, 3, 9, 24, 97, 187, 189, 206, 217, , , 367, , , 397,

Text: envisionmath by Scott Foresman Addison Wesley. Course Description

Language Acquisition Fall 2010/Winter Lexical Categories. Afra Alishahi, Heiner Drenhaus

DETERMINING AND NUMERATING IN CHILDREN'S SPEECH1 JOHN B. CARROLL

5. UPPER INTERMEDIATE

Listening and Speaking Skills of English Language of Adolescents of Government and Private Schools

lgarfield Public Schools Italian One 5 Credits Course Description

a) analyse sentences, so you know what s going on and how to use that information to help you find the answer.

Participate in expanded conversations and respond appropriately to a variety of conversational prompts

GERM 3040 GERMAN GRAMMAR AND COMPOSITION SPRING 2017

Heritage Korean Stage 6 Syllabus Preliminary and HSC Courses

ELD CELDT 5 EDGE Level C Curriculum Guide LANGUAGE DEVELOPMENT VOCABULARY COMMON WRITING PROJECT. ToolKit

What the National Curriculum requires in reading at Y5 and Y6

Developing Grammar in Context

National Literacy and Numeracy Framework for years 3/4

Intra-talker Variation: Audience Design Factors Affecting Lexical Selections

Philosophy of Literacy Education. Becoming literate is a complex step by step process that begins at birth. The National

BULATS A2 WORDLIST 2

Downloaded on T18:40:04Z. Title. Using parent report to assess early lexical production in children exposed to more than one language

First Grade Curriculum Highlights: In alignment with the Common Core Standards

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 154 ( 2014 )

Intensive English Program Southwest College

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT If sub mission ins not a book, cite appropriate location(s))

One Stop Shop For Educators

Programma di Inglese

Assessment and Evaluation

California Department of Education English Language Development Standards for Grade 8

Think A F R I C A when assessing speaking. C.E.F.R. Oral Assessment Criteria. Think A F R I C A - 1 -

To appear in The TESOL encyclopedia of ELT (Wiley-Blackwell) 1 RECASTING. Kazuya Saito. Birkbeck, University of London

Literature and the Language Arts Experiencing Literature

Pronunciation: Student self-assessment: Based on the Standards, Topics and Key Concepts and Structures listed here, students should ask themselves...

Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts

AN ANALYSIS OF GRAMMTICAL ERRORS MADE BY THE SECOND YEAR STUDENTS OF SMAN 5 PADANG IN WRITING PAST EXPERIENCES

November 2012 MUET (800)

Proof Theory for Syntacticians

TRAITS OF GOOD WRITING

Author: Justyna Kowalczys Stowarzyszenie Angielski w Medycynie (PL) Feb 2015

Taught Throughout the Year Foundational Skills Reading Writing Language RF.1.2 Demonstrate understanding of spoken words,

CORPUS ANALYSIS CORPUS ANALYSIS QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS

More ESL Teaching Ideas

Accessing Higher Education in Developing Countries: panel data analysis from India, Peru and Vietnam

Grade 11 Language Arts (2 Semester Course) CURRICULUM. Course Description ENGLISH 11 (2 Semester Course) Duration: 2 Semesters Prerequisite: None

Language Acquisition by Identical vs. Fraternal SLI Twins * Karin Stromswold & Jay I. Rifkin

Inleiding Taalkunde. Docent: Paola Monachesi. Blok 4, 2001/ Syntax 2. 2 Phrases and constituent structure 2. 3 A minigrammar of Italian 3

Analyzing Linguistically Appropriate IEP Goals in Dual Language Programs

Comprehension Recognize plot features of fairy tales, folk tales, fables, and myths.

and secondary sources, attending to such features as the date and origin of the information.

The Evaluation of Students Perceptions of Distance Education

WORK OF LEADERS GROUP REPORT

Houghton Mifflin Reading Correlation to the Common Core Standards for English Language Arts (Grade1)

Welcome to MyOutcomes Online, the online course for students using Outcomes Elementary, in the classroom.

TABE 9&10. Revised 8/2013- with reference to College and Career Readiness Standards

Emmaus Lutheran School English Language Arts Curriculum

Using a Native Language Reference Grammar as a Language Learning Tool

Words come in categories

Greeley-Evans School District 6 French 1, French 1A Curriculum Guide

Transcription:

LIGN171: Child Language Acquisition http://ling.ucsd.edu/courses/lign171 More on Words Chapter 7 LDER Lexical Development across languages Is lexical development the same for all languages? Language specific vs language universal patterns Compare English vs Italian, from 8-308 Universal Stages of Growth Routines and Word Games Expressive vocabulary of 0-100 Categories like noun/verb not useful Speech acts (performatives( performatives): vocal conventions used to achieve a social function bye ; uh-oh ; hi Reference Expressive vocabulary of 50-200 Most are nominals; ; that establish reference Predication Verbs and adjectives Reflect ability to encode relational meanings Begin to increase in number after about 100 Grammar Grammatical function Growth after about 300-500 Early use may reflect memorized routines After 400 may reflect emergence of grammar Really Universal? Changes in composition of vocabulary hypothesized to reflect universal developments in logical and conceptual substrates of meaning One argument: nouns must precede verbs in development because nouns are easy to grasp; verbs are more difficult to perceive Some studies of Korean and Chinese suggest that verbs may develop earlier than nouns in these languages Current Questions Do verbs necessarily start to develop relatively late? In all languages? What about a language for which verbs may be more salient than in English? For example, Italian. What is the relationship between vocabulary size and grammatical function? How to address these questions?

The CDI MacArthur Communicative Development Inventory Parental report checklist Developed for English; adapted for Italian Two scales: Words and Gestures (infant scale; 8-168 ) Part I: Checklist of 396 Parents indicate if the child understands the word; understands and produces the word Part II: checklist of 63 communicative gestures gestures for communication, play, imitation of parents and other adults, and activities with objects Words and Phrases scale (toddler scale; 16-30 ) Part I: Assesses productive vocabulary (content and function ) 680 (English); 670 (Italian) Part II: Grammatical Development use of possessives, plurals, and tenses, etc. Word Categories Nominals (generally) Common nouns, proper nouns, places to go, sound effects (used to refer to animals, etc.) Common nouns (specifically) Words that adults use to refer to concrete objects (i.e., exclude e names for people, sound effects, places to go) Proper nouns (specifically) Proper nouns and terms for people Sound effects (vroom, meow) Routines hi bye referrring to events: breakfast nap Familiar commands ( don( don t ) Verbs Action (uninflected) Adjectives Descriptive Grammatical Function Words Who participated? English 659 infants from 8-168 of age 1001 toddlers from 18-30 of age Italian 195 infants from 8-168 of age 386 toddlers from 16-30 of age Equal numbers of boys and girls in each sample Across a spectrum of socio-economic levels Children were excluded if they had: medical/neurological problems Substantial exposure to a second language Infants from 8-168 Comprehension: No differences between infants Production: Italian- group lagged behind English- group Overall, production lower than comprehension Huge individual differences (comprehension: mean 105, range 0-396) 0 Toddlers from 16-30 Expressive vocabulary English- slightly ahead of Italian- Large individual differences (at 24, mean of 300, range of 50-600) Making a fair comparison Due to differences in growth across Huge variability in vocabulary size at any given age Looking at vocabulary growth by age may be unfair Look at vocabulary growth by size of child s vocabulary not age of child

Italian Verb Advantage? Italian is a good test case to try to find out about early onset of verbs Allows extensive word order variation Variation in position helps identify Pro-drop language; ~70% subjects omitted Verbs often found in salient sentence initial or final positions Rich verbal morphology Italian sensitive to verb agreement at an early age Cross-linguistic differences in types of produced Divide into groups based on vocabulary size Italians seem to have an advantage for nominals (broadly defined), but not verbs Developmental Changes: Nouns and Verbs How much variation is there? 45% is proportion of entire checklist that is common nouns; 14% for verbs If acquisition of nouns (or verbs) were constant or random proportion should be flat line Common nouns increased in importance with vocabulary growth from 8-168 Verbs stayed flat Referential Style use of nouns Similar developmental and stylistic factors at work for both languages Really no Italian verb advantage? CDI list contains fewer verbs (14%) than nouns (45%) so a difference between nouns and verbs for total vocabulary not surprising Compute Noun opportunity score (nouns reported / 182) Verb opportunity score (verbs reported / 55) Nouns still grow faster than verbs in both languages! Production summary Nouns and verbs grow (occupy greater proportion of vocabulary as vocabulary size increases) What shrinks? Proper nouns Sound effects Routines Proper nouns, routines shrink more in English (cultural differences?) In both groups, early growth of nouns, consistent with developmental sequence from reference stage to predication stage

Receptive Vocabulary: 8-168 No verb advantage in production What about in comprehension? For common nouns: Proportion larger for comprehension than production Italian- ahead of English- For verbs: Italian- ahead of English- (by a little bit) Receptive Vocabulary: 8-168 Nouns outnumber verbs even in comprehension for both languages Supports developmental sequence from nouns to verbs in both languages Small advantage for verbs in Italian due to just a few specific? First produced in (percentage of in sample who produced a word, rank-ordered) Non-nominals nominals: : * Verbs capitalized English No verbs in top 50 Italian One verb in top 50 If all non-nominals nominals treated as verbs, then Italian actually has fewer verbs in top 10 First comprehended in (percentage of in sample who comprehended a word, rank- ordered) Non-nominals nominals: : * Verbs capitalized English Some verbs in top 50 Italian Some verbs in top 50 If all non-nominals nominals treated as verbs, then Italian actually has fewer verbs in top 10 For young (8-16 ) Both languages develop similarly Despite cross-linguistic differences in input and salience of verbs First are sound effects, nouns, routines, names for people Nouns predominate and grow fast, in comprehension and production, in both languages Verbs emerge earlier and grow faster in comprehension than production but are consistently outnumbered by nouns Grammatical function are very rare among first Toddlers (16-30 ) Examined four word categories Common nouns (~40% of list) Animals, toys, food and drink, clothing, body parts, household objects, furniture, rooms Predicates (~24% of list) Verbs and adjectives Closed-class (~14% of list) Social terms (~10% of list) Sound, routines

English- Preponderance of common nouns Slow growth of predicates Rarity of closed-class class Sharp, non-linear drop in social Italian- Preponderance of common nouns Slow growth of predicates Rarity of closed-class class Sharp, non-linear drop in social are similar Common Nouns Similar shape of growth curve in English and Italian Develop for English- faster Italian- catch up, and even slightly overtake the English speakers English- enjoy early advantage Italian- catch up No differences after about 100 Predicates What about just verbs? Slight advantage for English- Contrary to predictions of a verb advantage in Italian

Italian- have advantage in social terms (for 7 of 8 age categories) Could reflect cultural difference Italian- may be closer to extended family More relatives to name More opportunities for routines Social Terms Closed-class Items Italian- ahead of English- at most vocabulary sizes English- catch up at about 600 Summary for Toddlers Nouns and verbs Small differences favoring English- Does not support prediction of a verb advantage in Italian! Social Italian- have larger repertoire Closed-class Small advantage for Italian- Conclusions Nouns vs verbs No evidence for earlier emergence of verbs or predicates in Italian compared to English Slight advantage in English for nouns and verbs may reflect cultural differences Function Rare in both languages early (<200 ) Growth correlated with overall vocabulary size Linear growth in Italian Non-linear growth in English Differences between English/Italian (CDI) and Korean/Chinese (free production) may reflect methods; testing Korean with CDI revealed similar pattern as for Free speech vs. parental checklist may reflect what prefer to use, not what they are able to use Advice for paper