Evaluación Reunión Anual Conjunta 2011 de las Redes de Acción por el Ozono de América Latina y el Caribe Puerto España, Trinidad y Tobago Del 4 al 7 de octubre de 2011 Programa de Naciones Unidas para el Medio Ambiente
Cómo lo hicimos? Q u e s t i o n s 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 How did we do this meeting? 1 2 3 4 5 Ranks Distribution of information Planning and development of the meeting (logistics)
Aspectos positivos de la Reunión Please provide the three more positive aspects of the meeting Visit and presentation by Marco Gonzales Debate on HPMP implementation and alternative Eye-opener on financing possibilities Overal Trinidad experience Information about donors Presence of Implementing Agencies Presentations online, tour and cocktail reception allowed Strengthening and technological advances update of Sharing of information between regions Good food Adequate Accomodation Regional Interaction Nice Atmosphere Networking with experts Meeting Participants Logistics and Planning of the meeting Good information and Presentations 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 Numbers
Aspectos que necesitan mejorarse Please mention three aspects to be improved or corrected Venue for Lunch on the 1st day Meeting could have been two days Include techicians and policy makers to meeting Not enough variety of food choices Include time for working sessions To few country presentations Limited access to food and entertainment at hotel Some un-useful presentations Translation of Spanish to English was sometimes difficult Changes to Agenda - tired participants Invite more Civil Society IT Access DSA amount and distribution More case studies in presentations Shorter presentations Have the meeting venue and hotel in the same place 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Numbers
Uso de la información provista en la Reunión Please inform us on how you will be using the information provided from this meeting on your return home Info will be use in implementation and compliance Using information with stakeholders in their countries Information Relevent to current HCFC projects Financial info will be useful for future projects Intergrating information in their countries Incorporate the ozone unit into all future plans & prog Prepare project document & evaluate proposals Info of export bet US and the Caribbean Intergating info will take some time Networking and Sharing information 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 Numbers
La comunicación e el intercambio de experiencias entre las Unidades de Ozono ha mejorado? Has it contributed to improved the communication and exchange of experiences between the Ozone Units Greater Knowledge and Experience was Acquired 5% Not Really 24% Successful 71%
Barreras que limitan la implementación del Protocolo de Montreal para e 2013 y 2015 has sido identificadas? Has it contributed to identify barriers limiting the compliance with the Montreal Protocol for Jan 1st 2013? and 2015 Yes, it appears so but assistance needed for infrastructure, compliance and alternative tech 68% Not this meeting but previous ones 32%
Contribución a la planificación y el desarrollo de actividades conjuntas Has it contributed to the planning and development of joint actions? Not Sure 5% No 5% To some extent 25% Yes - by sharing of information between officers 65%
Evaluación del Foro Yahoo en la Región How do you evaluate the operation of the Yahoo e- forum of your region? Reasonable 21%? 22% It has proven very useful 57%
Información que debe incluirse en el Website de UNEP regional What type of information would you like to be included in the website of UNEP's Regional Office? Links to regional,international and Links to national ozone unit websites Info about co-financing and guidelines Updated training manuals for alternatives Press release about this meeting Not effective communication tool Not enough info on the website to make a Info on manufactures or suppliers of Articles about new technologies NA Successful experiences & synergies with 0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 Numbers