Woodside Primary School Marking and Feedback Policy

Similar documents
FEEDBACK & MARKING POLICY. Little Digmoor Primary School

LITERACY ACROSS THE CURRICULUM POLICY Humberston Academy

Feedback, Marking and Presentation Policy

St. Martin s Marking and Feedback Policy

Instructional Supports for Common Core and Beyond: FORMATIVE ASSESMENT

TASK 2: INSTRUCTION COMMENTARY

Creative Media Department Assessment Policy

Exemplar 6 th Grade Math Unit: Prime Factorization, Greatest Common Factor, and Least Common Multiple

Common Core Exemplar for English Language Arts and Social Studies: GRADE 1

TA Script of Student Test Directions

Myths, Legends, Fairytales and Novels (Writing a Letter)

School Experience Reflective Portfolio

J j W w. Write. Name. Max Takes the Train. Handwriting Letters Jj, Ww: Words with j, w 321

LITERACY ACROSS THE CURRICULUM POLICY

Abbey Academies Trust. Every Child Matters

Language skills to be used and worked upon : Listening / Speaking PPC-PPI / Reading / Writing

Title: George and Sam Save for a Present By: Lesson Study Group 2

Secondary English-Language Arts

EQuIP Review Feedback

Unit Lesson Plan: Native Americans 4th grade (SS and ELA)

UDL AND LANGUAGE ARTS LESSON OVERVIEW

Analyzing Linguistically Appropriate IEP Goals in Dual Language Programs

Special Educational Needs and Disabilities Policy Taverham and Drayton Cluster

Case study Norway case 1

Project Based Learning Debriefing Form Elementary School

LA1 - High School English Language Development 1 Curriculum Essentials Document

Cottesmore St Mary Catholic Primary School Pupil premium strategy

Changing User Attitudes to Reduce Spreadsheet Risk

INSTRUCTIONAL FOCUS DOCUMENT Grade 5/Science

National Literacy and Numeracy Framework for years 3/4

Grade 2: Using a Number Line to Order and Compare Numbers Place Value Horizontal Content Strand

Positive Learning Environment

Holy Family Catholic Primary School SPELLING POLICY

Assessment and Evaluation

Effective Instruction for Struggling Readers

Multi-genre Writing Assignment

Presentation 4 23 May 2017 Erasmus+ LOAF Project, Vilnius, Lithuania Dr Declan Kennedy, Department of Education, University College Cork, Ireland.

GRANT ELEMENTARY SCHOOL School Improvement Plan

Table of Contents. Introduction Choral Reading How to Use This Book...5. Cloze Activities Correlation to TESOL Standards...

This has improved to above national from 95.1 % in 2013 to 96.83% in 2016 Attainment

Special Educational Needs & Disabilities (SEND) Policy

South Carolina English Language Arts

Inspection dates Overall effectiveness Good Summary of key findings for parents and pupils This is a good school

CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

Final Teach For America Interim Certification Program

Interpretive (seeing) Interpersonal (speaking and short phrases)

End-of-Module Assessment Task

Content Language Objectives (CLOs) August 2012, H. Butts & G. De Anda

University of Cambridge: Programme Specifications POSTGRADUATE ADVANCED CERTIFICATE IN EDUCATIONAL STUDIES. June 2012

Using SAM Central With iread

Loughton School s curriculum evening. 28 th February 2017

Statistical Analysis of Climate Change, Renewable Energies, and Sustainability An Independent Investigation for Introduction to Statistics

International School of Kigali, Rwanda

1. READING ENGAGEMENT 2. ORAL READING FLUENCY

English Language Arts Summative Assessment

"Be who you are and say what you feel, because those who mind don't matter and

Queensborough Public Library (Queens, NY) CCSS Guidance for TASC Professional Development Curriculum

Story Problems with. Missing Parts. s e s s i o n 1. 8 A. Story Problems with. More Story Problems with. Missing Parts

Understanding and Supporting Dyslexia Godstone Village School. January 2017

Results In. Planning Questions. Tony Frontier Five Levers to Improve Learning 1

Danielle Dodge and Paula Barnick first

BENTLEY ST PAUL S C OF E PRIMARY SCHOOL POLICY FOR I.C.T. Growing together in faith, love and trust, we will succeed. Date of Policy: 2013

TEACH 3: Engage Students at All Levels in Rigorous Work

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Managing the Classroom for Differentiating Instruction and Collaborative Practice. Objectives for today

PEDAGOGICAL LEARNING WALKS: MAKING THE THEORY; PRACTICE

Math Pathways Task Force Recommendations February Background

Unpacking a Standard: Making Dinner with Student Differences in Mind

Developing a Language for Assessing Creativity: a taxonomy to support student learning and assessment

Basic: Question Words: Who, What, Where, When week 1

Carolina Course Evaluation Item Bank Last Revised Fall 2009

Think A F R I C A when assessing speaking. C.E.F.R. Oral Assessment Criteria. Think A F R I C A - 1 -

Thank you for encouraging your child to learn English and to take this YLE (Young Learners English) Flyers test.

Every curriculum policy starts from this policy and expands the detail in relation to the specific requirements of each policy s field.

Indicators Teacher understands the active nature of student learning and attains information about levels of development for groups of students.

Meet Modern Languages Department

Pedagogical Content Knowledge for Teaching Primary Mathematics: A Case Study of Two Teachers

WARREN COUNTY PUBLIC SCHOOLS CUMULATIVE RECORD CHANGE CHANGE DATE: JULY 8, 2014 REVISED 11/10/2014

Genevieve L. Hartman, Ph.D.

Curriculum Design Project with Virtual Manipulatives. Gwenanne Salkind. George Mason University EDCI 856. Dr. Patricia Moyer-Packenham

Let's Learn English Lesson Plan

Writing a composition

Kindergarten Lessons for Unit 7: On The Move Me on the Map By Joan Sweeney

Functional Skills Mathematics Level 2 assessment

Arizona s English Language Arts Standards th Grade ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS

The Curriculum in Primary Schools

Special Educational Needs Assessment for Learning. Phil Dexter, British Council, Teacher Development Adviser

Creating and Thinking critically

Workshop 5 Teaching Writing as a Process

Welcome to the Purdue OWL. Where do I begin? General Strategies. Personalizing Proofreading

To provide students with a formative and summative assessment about their learning behaviours. To reinforce key learning behaviours and skills that

Introducing the New Iowa Assessments Reading Levels 12 14

STUDENT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION AND PROMOTION

Elementary Campus Improvement Plan: School Based Improvement Committee Skaggs Elementary. Principal: Jamey J. Allen

RESPONSE TO LITERATURE

Unit 14 Dangerous animals

Lesson 12. Lesson 12. Suggested Lesson Structure. Round to Different Place Values (6 minutes) Fluency Practice (12 minutes)

PREP S SPEAKER LISTENER TECHNIQUE COACHING MANUAL

Handout 2.10a: 24 Operating Principles and the Verbal Behaviors That Go with Them Cultivating Classroom Discourse to Make Student Thinking Visible

Transcription:

Woodside Primary School Marking and Feedback Policy Rationale Woodside Primary School is committed to providing relevant and timely feedback to pupils, both orally and in writing. Marking intends to serve the purposes of valuing pupils learning, helping to diagnose areas for development or next steps and evaluating how well the learning task has been understood. Marking should aim to be a process of creating dialogue with the learner, through which feedback can be exchanged and questions asked; where the learner is actively involved in the process. Research shows that marking is the most important factor in pupil learning, so this policy is crucial for the school. Imagine what a difference it would make if all children knew what they were good at and knew what they needed to do to improve Aims Through the development of a rigorous Marking and Feedback Policy we aim to ensure the pupils understand what they have done well, how to improve their learning and clear, visible progress is evident. We will do this by providing the children with; Frequent, detailed and accurate written or oral feedback Positive comments highlighting what they have done well and developmental comments to show what they need to do to improve further Regular opportunities to respond to the feedback and make improvements Regular opportunities to use and apply their skills through next step tasks which deepen their learning Expectations Marking and feedback should: Relate to the learning objective, children s targets and/or success criteria Give recognition and praise achievement Inform future planning Be consistent across Key Stages Be seen by pupils as a positive approach to improve their learning

Methodology of marking pupils work in the Foundation Stage To be the most effective, children s work has to be marked and assesses within the same lesson in the foundation Stage. The children will be receiving continuous feedback throughout the lesson as appropriate and time will be given for them to make improvements or complete a next step to deepen their learning, according to flow diagram below: If task completed correctly, work marked using pink pen and stamped with learning objective achieved Children complete Teacher Directed Task and take to CT or TA for feedback If task complete incorrectly, CT or TA to give immediate verbal feedback and scaffold the child s learning on how to improve the work Think pink If there is time, and if appropriate, children to be given a next step using blue pen, to deepen thinking Children to have time to respond to feedback and have a go at improving their work If completed well, children to be rewarded If completed incorrectly, CT/TA to complete with child together If task completed well, children rewarded If task is till not completes correctly, address in planning If children have completed work independently, work to be stamped

Methodology of marking pupils work in Key Stage 1 and Key Stage 2 Summative feedback / marking This happens following a closed task where the answer is either right or wrong. Sometimes it may be appropriate for the pupils, as a class or in groups, to mark this themselves. Formative feedback / marking Not all pieces of work can be quality marked, but all marking must focus on success and improvement rather than solely on the correction of secretarial aspect of the work. Feedback must always be focused on the learning objective of the lesson. A positive pink comment should be written on most pieces of work. Some work may only need an objective met stamper. Quality marking requirement Children s written work in English and maths should be quality marked at least twice a week, and once a week in the foundation subjects. The emphasis should be on both successes against the learning objective and the next steps needs to improve learning. When quality marking, the following criteria should be applied.

Marking criteria Pink pen to be used for all successful work Comments kept brief and to the point Blue pen to be used for all next steps to further the child s learning If work has been completed independently, work to be stamped or marked with letter I If work has met the objective and does not need to be quality marked, work to be stamped Pink stars used for positive comments, linked to objective Blue arrow to give children next steps in learning or additional challenge Indicates work were children have been given or needed adult support. SS may also be used to indicate some support. To identify the different animal groups A: I can write in complete sentences M: I can use and to join my sentences S: I can use question marks Purple Pen of Power to be used for editing by the children. (Developed throughout KS1, used in KS2) Labels to be stuck in most pieces of work. Objective to be given and success criteria using All, Most, Some differentiation Used for assessment opportunities to highlight when individual target has been met. A number of spelling mistakes related to key vocabulary and age related common exception words will be underlined for children to correct.

Pupils response to marking comments Pupils should be given specific time during the week to read and respond to the written responses provided by the teacher. Pupils need opportunities to complete next steps or make improvements. Pupils should be encouraged to ask for clarification if they do not understand a comment. Children to use the Purple Pen of Power to edit and improve their work. Monitoring The senior Leadership Team, Key Stage Leaders and teachers are all responsible for ensuring the application of this policy. A monitoring cycle will be set up. As part of this, the quality and effectiveness of the marking and feedback will be assessed and recorded using the form below. Each half term, through CPD, teaching staff are to monitor and provide feedback on 3 specific children in each class (differing abilities). Specific next steps should be noted and then reassessed at the next monitoring session in the cycle. All teachers will adhere to the principles of the policy and: Provide regular written and oral feedback Provide time in lessons to review work from previous lessons Adjust planning in the light of marking Make learning objectives explicit Involve children in the process from an early stage Ensure children are clear about the teachers expectations Use children s work as exemplars

Always Sometimes Rarely Questions to ask when looking at written feedback Evidence of high quality feedback Comments Feedback focused on the learning objectives Progress within lessons evident through key word marking Feedback helps children understand what they have done well Teacher provides time to reflect and respond to written feedback responses evident on a regular basis Feedback encourages children to take the next steps in their learning Feedback provides opportunities for children to think things through themselves (Challenge tasks) Comments: (Overall application of policy, clear visible progress within lessons and over time Presentation of Work