Marking and Feedback Policy

Similar documents
LITERACY ACROSS THE CURRICULUM POLICY Humberston Academy

FEEDBACK & MARKING POLICY. Little Digmoor Primary School

Feedback, Marking and Presentation Policy

LITERACY ACROSS THE CURRICULUM POLICY

Cottesmore St Mary Catholic Primary School Pupil premium strategy

St. Martin s Marking and Feedback Policy

Special Educational Needs and Disabilities Policy Taverham and Drayton Cluster

Horizon Community College SEND Policy. Amended: June 2017 Ratified: July 2017

This has improved to above national from 95.1 % in 2013 to 96.83% in 2016 Attainment

Special Educational Needs Policy (including Disability)

Ferry Lane Primary School

Approval Authority: Approval Date: September Support for Children and Young People

Knowle DGE Learning Centre. PSHE Policy

SEND INFORMATION REPORT

Total amount of PPG expected for the year ,960. Objectives of spending PPG: In addition to the key principles, Oakdale Junior School:

Thameside Primary School Rationale for Assessment against the National Curriculum

Special Educational Needs & Disabilities (SEND) Policy

J j W w. Write. Name. Max Takes the Train. Handwriting Letters Jj, Ww: Words with j, w 321

Special Educational Needs and Disability (SEND) Policy

Bramcote Hills Primary School Special Educational Needs and Disability Policy (SEND) Inclusion Manager: Miss Susan Clarke

Holy Family Catholic Primary School SPELLING POLICY

Somerset Progressive School Planning, Assessment, Recording & Celebration Policy

Summary: Impact Statement

Primary School Experience Generic Handbook

5 Early years providers

Pentyrch Primary School Ysgol Gynradd Pentyrch

St Philip Howard Catholic School

St Matthew s RC High School

Loughton School s curriculum evening. 28 th February 2017

Special Educational Needs School Information Report

Special Educational Needs and Disabilities

Myths, Legends, Fairytales and Novels (Writing a Letter)

SEN INFORMATION REPORT

Short inspection of Maria Fidelis Roman Catholic Convent School FCJ

Special Educational Needs and Disability (SEND) Policy. November 2016

Charlton Kings Infants School

National Literacy and Numeracy Framework for years 3/4

SEN SUPPORT ACTION PLAN Page 1 of 13 Read Schools to include all settings where appropriate.

Upper Wharfedale School POSITIVE ATTITUDE TO LEARNING POLICY

Inspection dates Overall effectiveness Good Summary of key findings for parents and pupils This is a good school

Student Experience Strategy

29 th April Mrs Diana Dryland Headteacher Bursted Wood Primary School Swanbridge Road Bexley Heath Kent DA7 5BS

Creative Media Department Assessment Policy

Multi-sensory Language Teaching. Seamless Intervention with Quality First Teaching for Phonics, Reading and Spelling

Reviewed December 2015 Next Review December 2017 SEN and Disabilities POLICY SEND

Newlands Girls School

Code of Practice for. Disabilities. (eyfs & KS1.2)

Archdiocese of Birmingham

PUPIL PREMIUM REVIEW

Special Education Needs & Disability (SEND) Policy

Idsall External Examinations Policy

THE QUEEN S SCHOOL Whole School Pay Policy

Plans for Pupil Premium Spending

School Experience Reflective Portfolio

Mini Lesson Ideas for Expository Writing

Grade 3: Module 2B: Unit 3: Lesson 10 Reviewing Conventions and Editing Peers Work

Coast Academies Writing Framework Step 4. 1 of 7

University of Cambridge: Programme Specifications POSTGRADUATE ADVANCED CERTIFICATE IN EDUCATIONAL STUDIES. June 2012

COUNSELLING PROCESS. Definition

Lismore Comprehensive School

PREP S SPEAKER LISTENER TECHNIQUE COACHING MANUAL

Lancaster Lane CP School. The Importance of Motor Skills

Every curriculum policy starts from this policy and expands the detail in relation to the specific requirements of each policy s field.

STUDENT AND ACADEMIC SERVICES

Helping at Home ~ Supporting your child s learning!

Equality Policy Committee Responsible Human Resources Last review: 2015/2016 Next Review: 2016/2017 1

Interpreting ACER Test Results

Understanding and Supporting Dyslexia Godstone Village School. January 2017

Pupil Premium Grants. Information for Parents. April 2016

Examinations Officer Part-Time Term-Time 27.5 hours per week

PUPIL PREMIUM POLICY

ELP in whole-school use. Case study Norway. Anita Nyberg

Putnoe Primary School

Version Number 3 Date of Issue 30/06/2009 Latest Revision 11/12/2015 All Staff in NAS schools, NAS IT Dept Head of Operations - Education

Subject: Opening the American West. What are you teaching? Explorations of Lewis and Clark

THE FRYDERYK CHOPIN UNIVERSITY OF MUSIC

Evaluation Off Off On On

Note Taking Handbook Mount Aloysius College Disability Services

BENGKEL 21ST CENTURY LEARNING DESIGN PERINGKAT DAERAH KUNAK, 2016

This publication is also available for download at

The Curriculum in Primary Schools

Alma Primary School. School report. Summary of key findings for parents and pupils. Inspection dates March 2015

PGCE Secondary Education. Primary School Experience

Me on the Map. Standards: Objectives: Learning Activities:

Woodlands Primary School. Policy for the Education of Children in Care

Evaluation of pupil premium grant expenditure 2015/16 Review Date: 16th July 2016

Oasis Academy Coulsdon

Stimulating Techniques in Micro Teaching. Puan Ng Swee Teng Ketua Program Kursus Lanjutan U48 Kolej Sains Kesihatan Bersekutu, SAS, Ulu Kinta

Conversation Task: The Environment Concerns Us All

Whole School Literacy Policy 2017/18

Using research in your school and your teaching Research-engaged professional practice TPLF06

Being BEING ENTREPRENEURIAL OCR LEVEL 2 AND 3 AWARDS IN BEING ENTREPRENEURIAL DELIVERY GUIDE

Calculators in a Middle School Mathematics Classroom: Helpful or Harmful?

STUDENTS' RATINGS ON TEACHER

Proposal for an annual meeting format (quality and structure)

KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING

Eastbury Primary School

Supporting children with gaps in their mathematical understanding

West s Paralegal Today The Legal Team at Work Third Edition

DIOCESE OF PLYMOUTH VICARIATE FOR EVANGELISATION CATECHESIS AND SCHOOLS

Transcription:

Marking and Feedback Policy Courtesy, Consideration and Respect Updated: September 2017. Next Review Date: September 2018.

1. Aim The aim of this policy is to ensure clear understanding of the purposes, procedures and processes of effective marking and feedback to pupils regarding their work in order to maximise progress and support pupils in becoming affective learners. Effective marking and feedback is integral to good teaching and learning processes. By empowering pupils to be actively involved in understanding how they are making progress, it helps to embed learning swiftly and enables accelerated learning. Effective marking and feedback aims to: 1. Inform the pupil what they have done well and what they need to do to improve. 2. Support pupil confidence and self-esteem in learning, and contributes to accelerated learning. 3. Support teachers assessment knowledge of each pupil as part of thorough assessment for learning procedures, in order to plan and refine next steps in learning. 4. Develop consistent processes across the school to teach pupils to respond to feedback, self-assess and evaluate their own learning. 2. Processes There are four types of marking/feedback used at Mill Hill Primary Academy. 1. Verbal Feedback. This is used to prompt deeper thinking, and swiftly address misconceptions during lessons. It occurs through effective questioning to clarify or refocus tasks and enquiry, mini plenaries and mid-lesson adjustments. It may also be verbal feedback given during a 1:1 discussion with a pupil or a with a group. This will be observed during learning walks or lesson observations. 2. Marking with a child. This takes place in a 1:1 situation and makes use of the school marking codes and non- negotiables. During this time the teacher and pupil will identify all successes and improvements within a piece of writing, This allows instant feedback for the child who can then edit and improve their work accordingly. 3. Self/Peer Assessment. This allows children to feedback on their own or another child s work using specific instructions from the teacher. 4. Distant Marking. This is marking that takes places away from the lesson. This allows the teacher to use assessment for learning to move forward in planning next steps for learning. School marking codes are to be used and a comment may be written at the end of the work if necessary. 3.Non-negotiables for Marking. All marking is to be carried out in green and pink pen. (Year 1 are trialing coloured fans during 2017/18 and policy will be updated accordingly) Children must respond to feedback in a different colour to the original piece of work. All marking is to be done in clear legible handwriting. The marking code is to be followed in all cases. (see Appendix 1) The marking code should be accessible to all pupils in the learning environment. All children s work must have feedback from an adult. This can be marking codes or a written comment. If children have marked the work themselves, then it must still be checked and initialed by a teacher. 4.Frequency of marking All work is to be recognised by an adult. Feedback can take the form of marking codes or a written

comment. If children have marked or assessed their own or another child s work, then this must be checked and initialed by an adult. During extended writing, feedback may not be given every lesson but at appropriate times during the piece of work. 5.Prorities for marking Literacy/CLJ/RE/PHSE Feedback should focus on 3 main priorities Punctuation Spelling Sentence construction. Successes in these areas should be highlighted in green and improvements highlighted in pink- using the school marking codes ( Appendix 1). The priorities are in hierarchical order and should be targeted as such. Teachers should not try and fix everything within the piece of work but focus on the gap that needs closing first. Maths Questions that have been answered correctly are to be given a green tick and errors identified with a pink dot. Challenge questions (if needed) are to be written in pink. Science Work should be marked against the 3 writing priorities and then a comment linked to the subject specific Learning Objective made. 6.Responsibilities It is the responsibility of the class teachers to ensure that this policy is consistently carried out, including enabling pupils to respond to feedback tasks. It is the responsibility of all staff working with pupils to ensure the marking code is consistently adhered to across the school. Each subject leader has the responsibility for monitoring that the policy is being consistently carried out in their particular subject area. Likewise the SENCo has responsibility to ensure the policy is appropriately adapted and implemented for SEN pupils. This includes reference in Pupil Passports and agreements as appropriate. It is the responsibility of the DHT and Assistant heads to liaise with the Subject Leaders and to feed back to the Headteacher and Governors on the implementation of the policy, its consistency across the school and the impact it has upon progress. It is the responsibility of the Headteacher to ensure that effective marking and feedback is monitored and evaluated as part of the quality assurance of teaching and learning across the school. 7. Equality of Opportunity All pupils are entitled to have their work marked in accordance with this policy. 8. SEN and Inclusion Effective feedback and marking must be accessible to all pupils and will reflect their individual needs and abilities. This may mean writing comments for specific pupils in an accessible colour, it may mean

supporting pupils to read comments, it may mean recording verbal feedback and response. Such requirements should be identified in a pupil's Pupil passport as required. 9. Monitoring and Evaluation Monitoring of the policy will be done through work scrutiny led by the Headteacher and SLT leads as appropriate. It will be monitored for whole school consistency and evaluated for impact on pupils outcomes. The Headteacher will also monitor the impact of developmental marking through work scrutiny in both Maths and Literacy as part of lesson observations to monitor the quality of teaching and learning in the school. In Foundation Stage this will also include scrutiny of observational assessment and content of Learning Journeys. This will be triangulated with pupil interviews to ascertain how developmental marking supports them in understanding what they need to do to improve their learning and to make progress. Work Scrutiny will be used to monitor consistency across the school and impact of the policy on pupil outcomes. A work scrutiny schedule will be used to monitor and feedback will be given to individual teachers. Evaluation of Feedback and response will be done through the impact on pupil progress, including progress data but also pupil progress meetings and review of SEN provision and impact of the Pupil Premium Grant.

Appendix 1 Marking will follow the idea that green is good and pink makes us think. Marking codes are to be used to identify priorities for improvement around Punctuation, Spelling and Sentence Construction. in margin = this writing is good. P in margin = Punctuation error. Circle around word = spelling error. squiggly line under word = word needs improving. = Improve your writing here. ( ) around words = re-write this bit to make it clearer.? in margin = There is something wrong on this line. Find it and fix it.