MPPR & Leadership Evaluation

Similar documents
Writing a Basic Assessment Report. CUNY Office of Undergraduate Studies

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)

Final Teach For America Interim Certification Program

Instructional Approach(s): The teacher should introduce the essential question and the standard that aligns to the essential question

Career Checkpoint. What is Career Checkpoint? Make the most of your Marketable Skills

Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011)

NAME OF ASSESSMENT: Reading Informational Texts and Argument Writing Performance Assessment

Common Core Postsecondary Collaborative

Karla Brooks Baehr, Ed.D. Senior Advisor and Consultant The District Management Council

George Mason University Graduate School of Education Education Leadership Program. Course Syllabus Spring 2006

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

D direct? or I indirect?

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS GUIDELINES

Administrative Master Syllabus

Assessment for Student Learning: Institutional-level Assessment Board of Trustees Meeting, August 23, 2016

ACCT 3400, BUSN 3400-H01, ECON 3400, FINN COURSE SYLLABUS Internship for Academic Credit Fall 2017

Higher Education / Student Affairs Internship Manual

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

School Leadership Rubrics

Queen's Clinical Investigator Program: In- Training Evaluation Form

Providing Feedback to Learners. A useful aide memoire for mentors

OFFICE OF HUMAN RESOURCES SAMPLE WEB CONFERENCE OR ON-CAMPUS INTERVIEW QUESTIONS

HIGHLAND HIGH SCHOOL CREDIT FLEXIBILITY PLAN

West Georgia RESA 99 Brown School Drive Grantville, GA

leading people through change

1. Faculty responsible for teaching those courses for which a test is being used as a placement tool.

What does Quality Look Like?

Xenia High School Credit Flexibility Plan (CFP) Application

John Jay College of Criminal Justice, CUNY ASSESSMENT REPORT: SPRING Undergraduate Public Administration Major

Indicators Teacher understands the active nature of student learning and attains information about levels of development for groups of students.

Kelso School District and Kelso Education Association Teacher Evaluation Process (TPEP)

Taking the Lead Working With Adult Learners

Office: Bacon Hall 316B. Office Phone:

Maximizing Learning Through Course Alignment and Experience with Different Types of Knowledge

SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

Grade 6: Module 2A: Unit 2: Lesson 8 Mid-Unit 3 Assessment: Analyzing Structure and Theme in Stanza 4 of If

The D2L eportfolio for Teacher Candidates

POL EVALUATION PLAN. Created for Lucy Learned, Training Specialist Jet Blue Airways

Secondary English-Language Arts

MASTER OF ARTS IN APPLIED SOCIOLOGY. Thesis Option

eportfolio Guide Missouri State University

SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Process and Reports

ONBOARDING NEW TEACHERS: WHAT THEY NEED TO SUCCEED. MSBO Spring 2017

Odyssey Writer Online Writing Tool for Students

Assessing Children s Writing Connect with the Classroom Observation and Assessment

Indiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning. PBL Certification Process

Using Team-based learning for the Career Research Project. Francine White. LaGuardia Community College

Field Experience and Internship Handbook Master of Education in Educational Leadership Program

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT If sub mission ins not a book, cite appropriate location(s))

Residency Principal and Program Administrator Internship and Certification Handbook

The D2L eportfolio for Teacher Candidates

New Jersey Department of Education World Languages Model Program Application Guidance Document

Short Term Action Plan (STAP)

What is PDE? Research Report. Paul Nichols

NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Policy Manual

MBA6941, Managing Project Teams Course Syllabus. Course Description. Prerequisites. Course Textbook. Course Learning Objectives.

Coaching Others for Top Performance 16 Hour Workshop

Qualitative Site Review Protocol for DC Charter Schools

Assessment and Evaluation

The 21st Century Principal

Evidence for Reliability, Validity and Learning Effectiveness

Midterm Evaluation of Student Teachers

The Revised Math TEKS (Grades 9-12) with Supporting Documents

Practical Strategies for Using Guided Math to Help Your Students Meet or Exceed the

Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011: 20. Faculty member completing template: Molly Dugan (Date: 1/26/2012)

Stakeholder Debate: Wind Energy

BUS 4040, Communication Skills for Leaders Course Syllabus. Course Description. Course Textbook. Course Learning Outcomes. Credits. Academic Integrity

The newly revised NCSSFL-ACTFL Can-Do Statements offer language educators a

Chart 5: Overview of standard C

DESIGNPRINCIPLES RUBRIC 3.0

Writing Effective Program Learning Outcomes. Deborah Panter, J.D. Director of Educational Effectiveness & Assessment

Great Teachers, Great Leaders: Developing a New Teaching Framework for CCSD. Updated January 9, 2013

Susan K. Woodruff. instructional coaching scale: measuring the impact of coaching interactions

Introduction to the Revised Mathematics TEKS (2012) Module 1

Fearless Change -- Patterns for Introducing New Ideas

Instructional Supports for Common Core and Beyond: FORMATIVE ASSESMENT

ED487: Methods for Teaching EC-6 Social Studies, Language Arts and Fine Arts

The Characteristics of Programs of Information

Field Experience Management 2011 Training Guides

Tutoring First-Year Writing Students at UNM

West s Paralegal Today The Legal Team at Work Third Edition

A Guide to Student Portfolios

LITERACY-6 ESSENTIAL UNIT 1 (E01)

MENTORING. Tips, Techniques, and Best Practices

TEKS Resource System. Effective Planning from the IFD & Assessment. Presented by: Kristin Arterbury, ESC Region 12

RED 3313 Language and Literacy Development course syllabus Dr. Nancy Marshall Associate Professor Reading and Elementary Education

PROPOSAL FOR NEW UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM. Institution Submitting Proposal. Degree Designation as on Diploma. Title of Proposed Degree Program

TEACHING QUALITY: SKILLS. Directive Teaching Quality Standard Applicable to the Provision of Basic Education in Alberta

Intentional coaching and planning: Integrating practices into content instruction

IBCP Language Portfolio Core Requirement for the International Baccalaureate Career-Related Programme

RDGED 722: Reading Specialist Practicum Field Experience Handbook

Critical Decisions within Student Learning Objectives: Target Setting Model

ADDIE: A systematic methodology for instructional design that includes five phases: Analysis, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation.

FELLOWSHIP PROGRAM FELLOW APPLICATION

Grade 6: Module 2A Unit 2: Overview

First Line Manager Development. Facilitated Blended Accredited

Grade 6: Module 3A: Unit 2: Lesson 11 Planning for Writing: Introduction and Conclusion of a Literary Analysis Essay

University of the Arts London (UAL) Diploma in Professional Studies Art and Design Date of production/revision May 2015

eportfolio for Your Professional Teaching Practice

Transcription:

MPPR & Leadership Evaluation A Re-calibration Workshop for Lead Evaluators January 17, 2013 Dr. Charlene Jordan

Our Agenda for Today: Review Elements of Certification MPPR Tips & Activities Tools for Supervisors: Checklist Evidence Collection Form Planning Unannounced School Visits A couple of articles!

9 Elements for Lead Evaluator Certification NYS Teaching Standards and the ISLLC, 2008 Leadership Standards Evidence-based observation techniques Application and use of the student growth and value-added growth model Application and use of State-approved teacher/principal rubrics Application and use of any assessment tools you intend to use (e.g., portfolios, surveys, goals) Application and use of any State-approved locally developed measures of student achievement you intend to use Use of the Statewide Instructional Reporting System The scoring methodology used by the department and/or your district Specific considerations in evaluating teachers and principals of English language learners *** Other: While not listed as a training component, districts will need to ensure inter-rater reliability for both their teacher and principal evaluation systems.

MPPR TIPS Start with the goals and work back to the domains the domains are aligned and used to support goal attainment Focus on signature processes/products that unfold over time and are truly representative of multidimensional practice over course of a year (avoid a moment in time) Use defensible evidence Where possible, have Principals collaborate with colleagues to identify & agree on evidence!

Recognizing & Gathering Defensible Evidence Defensible evidence is... Objective - free of opinion & bias Quantifiable when appropriate contains numerical information and data Specific data and artifacts Low inference all summary and descriptive statements are factual, and supported by details and artifacts as appropriate

Recognizing & Gathering Defensible Evidence Defensible evidence is NOT... Subjective Judgmental Opinionated Infused with recommendations and interpretations High inference summarized and lacking details needed to defend / validate any judgment High inference evidence is an indication that you need to develop questions, and gather more objective (low inference) evidence to support an accurate interpretation of the principal s practice.

More MPPR Tips: What s Reasonable? For each domain, 3-4 pieces of evidence. P explains why this evidence is selected Evidence is tracked on MPPR rubric dates noted of supervisor review in each domain Comments section with dates used for follow up meetings

TO GET US STARTED What is one thing you ve done this year for principal evaluation that you haven t done before? How has it gone? What artifacts of evidence have you begun collecting?

Assessing & Questioning the Evidence Working with a partner: Review examples of artifacts in Part I Rate the examples of evidence for each of the domains in Part II What questions might you pose to the principal to improve the quality of evidence in the examples in Part III?

The Check-List Think about one of the Principals that you are evaluating: What items can you check off? What will you add that wasn t listed? How might a tool such as this be helpful to you? To the Principal?

Evidence Collection Form For each of the domains, we have provided a series of questions to assist you in the evidence-gathering process: Are these the right questions for your district? What might you add/remove? What is one example of a signature practice you would expect in each of the domains?

Example SLO Leadership MPPR DOMAIN 1. Shared Vision of Learning An educational leader promotes the success of every student by facilitating the development, articulation, implementation, and stewardship of a vision of learning that is shared and supported by all stakeholders. Collect and use data to identify goals, assess organizational effectiveness, and promote organizational learning (what other domain does SLO work fall into?) SIGNATURE PRACTICE/QUESTIONS Principal provides analysis of SLO scores from October & January Attaches minutes of sample SLO conferences with teachers reviewing data for struggling students and plan of action. SLO-Related Questions: How do your teachers SLOs align to the school and district vision and goals? How are your teachers and students progressing on their SLOs? How do you know?

Planning an Unannounced School Visit Who would you speak with? Will you determine the focus of the visit or will you ask the Principal to take the lead? What evidence would you hope to collect on the visit? Will you spend time in classrooms? What evidence of Common Core implementation would you expect to see? What (and when) will you tell your Principal about the visit?

Processing & Debriefing How did the discussion with your colleagues about evidence/artifacts influence your thinking? What questions do you have about the rubric? The process? What additional supports do you need?