Educational Leadership Doctoral Program. Doctoral Student Handbook

Similar documents
M.S. in Environmental Science Graduate Program Handbook. Department of Biology, Geology, and Environmental Science

Handbook for Graduate Students in TESL and Applied Linguistics Programs

Doctoral GUIDELINES FOR GRADUATE STUDY

Individual Interdisciplinary Doctoral Program Faculty/Student HANDBOOK

HANDBOOK. Doctoral Program in Educational Leadership. Texas A&M University Corpus Christi College of Education and Human Development

GRADUATE SCHOOL DOCTORAL DISSERTATION AWARD APPLICATION FORM

MASTER OF EDUCATION DEGREE: PHYSICAL EDUCATION GRADUATE MANUAL

Graduate Handbook Linguistics Program For Students Admitted Prior to Academic Year Academic year Last Revised March 16, 2015

DEPARTMENT OF POLITICAL SCIENCE AND INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS. GRADUATE HANDBOOK And PROGRAM POLICY STATEMENT

Anthropology Graduate Student Handbook (revised 5/15)

Journalism Graduate Students Handbook Guide to the Doctoral Program

MASTER OF ARTS IN APPLIED SOCIOLOGY. Thesis Option

DEPARTMENT OF MOLECULAR AND CELL BIOLOGY

BUSINESS INFORMATION SYSTEMS PhD PROGRAM DESCRIPTION AND DOCTORAL STUDENT MANUAL

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN POLITICAL SCIENCE

Doctor of Philosophy in Theology

GRADUATE PROGRAM Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Drexel University Graduate Advisor: Prof. Caroline Schauer, Ph.D.

SCHOOL OF ART & ART HISTORY

Educational Leadership and Policy Studies Doctoral Programs (Ed.D. and Ph.D.)

GRADUATE. Graduate Programs

Department of Political Science Kent State University. Graduate Studies Handbook (MA, MPA, PhD programs) *

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY HANDBOOK

NSU Oceanographic Center Directions for the Thesis Track Student

DEPARTMENT OF EARLY CHILDHOOD, SPECIAL EDUCATION, and REHABILITATION COUNSELING. DOCTORAL PROGRAM Ph.D.

- COURSE DESCRIPTIONS - (*From Online Graduate Catalog )

Doctoral Student Experience (DSE) Student Handbook. Version January Northcentral University

SCHOOL OF EDUCATION. DOCTOR OF EDUCATION (EdD) DISSERTATION HANDBOOK

DMA Timeline and Checklist Modified for use by DAC Chairs (based on three-year timeline)

Department of Rural Sociology Graduate Student Handbook University of Missouri College of Agriculture, Food and Natural Resources

Department of Education School of Education & Human Services Master of Education Policy Manual

GRADUATE PROGRAM IN ENGLISH

Program in Molecular Medicine

A PROCEDURAL GUIDE FOR MASTER OF SCIENCE STUDENTS DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN DEVELOPMENT AND FAMILY STUDIES AUBURN UNIVERSITY

THE M.A. DEGREE Revised 1994 Includes All Further Revisions Through May 2012

GUIDELINES FOR HUMAN GENETICS

SORORITY AND FRATERNITY AFFAIRS POLICY ON EXPANSION FOR SOCIAL SORORITIES AND FRATERNITIES

American Studies Ph.D. Timeline and Requirements

Indiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning. PBL Certification Process

GRADUATE STUDENT HANDBOOK Master of Science Programs in Biostatistics

School of Earth and Space Exploration. Graduate Program Guidebook. Arizona State University

Graduate Student Handbook: Doctoral Degree

HIGHLAND HIGH SCHOOL CREDIT FLEXIBILITY PLAN

Navigating the PhD Options in CMS

Educational Leadership and Administration

Wildlife, Fisheries, & Conservation Biology

Santa Fe Community College Teacher Academy Student Guide 1

Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011)

Policy for Hiring, Evaluation, and Promotion of Full-time, Ranked, Non-Regular Faculty Department of Philosophy

USC VITERBI SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING

Residential Admissions Procedure Manual

UNIVERSITY OF BIRMINGHAM CODE OF PRACTICE ON LEAVE OF ABSENCE PROCEDURE

MPA Internship Handbook AY

PHL Grad Handbook Department of Philosophy Michigan State University Graduate Student Handbook

Reference to Tenure track faculty in this document includes tenured faculty, unless otherwise noted.

Steps for Thesis / Thematic Paper Process (Master s Degree Program)

Florida A&M University Graduate Policies and Procedures

Distinguished Teacher Review

THESIS GUIDE FORMAL INSTRUCTION GUIDE FOR MASTER S THESIS WRITING SCHOOL OF BUSINESS

STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT

College of Engineering and Applied Science Department of Computer Science

HANDBOOK FOR HISTORY GRADUATE STUDENTS

Admission ADMISSIONS POLICIES APPLYING TO BISHOP S UNIVERSITY. Application Procedure. Application Deadlines. CEGEP Applicants

Fordham University Graduate School of Social Service

Kinesiology. Master of Science in Kinesiology. Doctor of Philosophy in Kinesiology. Admission Criteria. Admission Criteria.

Department of Neurobiology and Anatomy. Graduate Student Handbook

Doctoral Programs Faculty and Student Handbook Edition

College of Arts and Science Procedures for the Third-Year Review of Faculty in Tenure-Track Positions

School of Basic Biomedical Sciences College of Medicine. M.D./Ph.D PROGRAM ACADEMIC POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

SCHOOL PSYCHOLOGY PH.D. STUDENT HANDBOOK

Information Event Master Thesis

The Ohio State University Department Of History. Graduate Handbook

Graduate/Professional School Overview

Higher Education / Student Affairs Internship Manual

PUTRA BUSINESS SCHOOL (GRADUATE STUDIES RULES) NO. CONTENT PAGE. 1. Citation and Commencement 4 2. Definitions and Interpretations 4

MATERIALS SCIENCE AND ENGINEERING GRADUATE MANUAL

ADMISSION TO THE UNIVERSITY

Guidelines for Incorporating Publication into a Thesis. September, 2015

University of Massachusetts Lowell Graduate School of Education Program Evaluation Spring Online

Department of Plant and Soil Sciences

SAMPLE SYLLABUS. Master of Health Care Administration Academic Center 3rd Floor Des Moines, Iowa 50312

THE UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN PSYCHOLOGY STUDENT ACADEMIC AFFAIRS POLICIES & PROCEDURES MANUAL FOR GRADUATE STUDENTS

PREPARING FOR THE SITE VISIT IN YOUR FUTURE

Loyola University Maryland Center for Montessori Education

Schock Financial Aid Office 030 Kershner Student Service Center Phone: (610) University Avenue Fax: (610)

Preparing for Medical School

Northwestern University School of Communication

GRADUATE EDUCATION. Office of Graduate Education (OGE) Dean Spalding Maile Way Honolulu, HI Tel: (808)

FROM THE DEPARTMENT CHAIR

HONORS OPTION GUIDELINES

University of Exeter College of Humanities. Assessment Procedures 2010/11

Doctor of Philosophy in Intelligent Systems Engineering

P920 Higher Nationals Recognition of Prior Learning

Graduate Group in Geography

Basic Skills Plus. Legislation and Guidelines. Hope Opportunity Jobs

GRADUATE STUDENTS Academic Year

EDUCATION. Readmission. Residency Requirements and Time Limits. Transfer of Credits. Rules and Procedures. Program of Study

We are strong in research and particularly noted in software engineering, information security and privacy, and humane gaming.

Fall Semester All deadlines are at 12:00 midnight unless otherwise stated.

MGMT 479 (Hybrid) Strategic Management

TABLE OF CONTENTS. By-Law 1: The Faculty Council...3

Transcription:

Educational Leadership Doctoral Program Doctoral Student Handbook

2 College of Education Department of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies The Department of Educational Leadership and Policy Studies Educational Leadership Doctoral Program Program Overview The Educational Leadership doctoral program brings together education scholars who come from a variety of experiences and expertise, and challenges the conventional wisdom that K-12 and post-secondary education are too different to be understood by the same practice, policy, or research. The program promotes and requires rigorous scholarship that spans the educational continuum and is ideal for students seeking to enter careers in research, institutional assessment, policy analysis, instructional leadership, or the professoriate. Students of EL should anticipate the academic rigor that the university and department embrace as its mission to obtain status as a Tier 1, National Research University. The program is similar to a traditional PhD program in that it requires the completion of several research courses and the completion of a dissertation and targets students who wish to contribute to the field of knowledge and scholarship. Each year students who are accepted into the program are admitted into a cohort of students. For the first two years, students take coursework together. Because most of our students are working professionals, students take six required hours a semester. In addition to coursework, students are required to complete a dissertation. Plan of Study Once admitted into the program, students take a set rotation of courses with their cohort for three years. The courses include a core of leadership, policy, and research, an area of specialization (electives), and dissertation hours. Students complete a total of 66 hours. Research Methods Core (15 hours)

3 EDAD 6304 K-16 Quantitative Research Design & Methodology EDAD 6308 K-16 Qualitative Research Design & Methodology EDAD 6310 Statistical Methods EDAD 6315 Advanced Statistical Methods EDAD 6318 Advanced Qualitative Research Core Content Courses (15 hours) EDAD 6320 K-16 Philosophy & History Policy Research EDAD 6327 Law and Policy Research EDAD 6342 Organizational and Leadership Theory EDAD 6343 Social and Cultural Contexts of Education EDAD 6301 Introduction to K-16 Doctoral Studies Elective Courses (18 hours) EDAD 6390 Selected Topics in K-16 Educational Leadership Research EDAD 6392 Selected Topics in K-16 Educational Policy Research EDAD 6391 Independent Study All elective courses should be doctoral level and approved by the student s major professor. Dissertation (24 semester credit hours minimum) Students should refer to the course rotation to determine what classes will be offered each semester. A tentative course rotation will be submitted to students during orientation and will be available on the Department website. It is the student s responsibility to register for each class. Continuity in the Program Because of the importance of maintaining momentum in the doctoral program and the learning experiences and emotional support that accrue from studying in a cohort, students are expected to enroll each semester in the courses designated for EL doctoral students. Attendance at every class meeting is extremely important; activities and assignments will take place. If students wish to acquire an I or Incomplete in a course because of health or emergency reasons, they must provide documentation to the course professor as to why the work could not be completed. Students have one year after the end of the course to submit work and receive a favorable grade change; otherwise the grade will automatically revert to the grade assigned by the professor given the amount of work completed until that time. Choosing to enroll in a doctoral program is a lifestyle change and requires careful planning and prioritizing. Attending class and various educational activities, working on assignments, expanding knowledge, and contributing to the field are time- and thought-

4 consuming activities. Doing them well requires commitment. If students choose to stop taking courses, they are removed from the program. If they later wish to regain entry into the program, students may reapply. Re-admission is not guaranteed. Advising Graduate Advisor, Program Coordinator, Supervising Professor, and Dissertation Committee Students admission and progression through the program are guided by several people: The graduate advisor will assist in admission and course registration. The program coordinator will address general questions and organize program events. The supervising professor is appointed at the beginning of the student s program and is responsible for advising the student up to the end of organized coursework. The supervising professor is often randomly selected by the Department prior to orientation. If students wish to select another supervising professor, they may do so. The supervising professor is not the dissertation advisor. The dissertation advisor is selected by the student during the second year of study. The dissertation advisor will oversee the student s writing of the dissertation. At the same time, the student, with the assistance of the dissertation advisor, will select a committee of at least two other voting members. The Dissertation Committee will work in collaboration with the dissertation advisor and the student toward the successful completion of a quality dissertation. Paperwork, indicating the choice of the dissertation advisor and the dissertation committee, is due before the student can begin dissertation hours and should be submitted according to Office of Graduate Studies and Department deadlines. Qualifying Examination The qualifying examination is the successful defense of a dissertation proposal. Students enter into doctoral candidacy following the successful defense of their dissertation proposal. Dissertation Requirements All doctoral students must be aware of requirements and deadlines associated with the dissertation, final defense, and submission of the final copies of the dissertation to the Office of Graduate Studies. The deadline dates for each semester are published in the Graduate School Calendar at http://grad.pci.uta.edu/about/catalog/current/calendar/. Students should be familiar with the current calendar. The dissertation represents the culmination of the student's academic efforts and is

5 expected to demonstrate original and independent research activity and be a significant contribution to knowledge. Once the student is enrolled in dissertation courses, continuous enrollment is required. (This includes fall and spring terms only. Dissertation students are not required to enroll in the summer unless they are planning to defend during the summer term.) A student receiving advice and assistance from a faculty member in the preparation of a dissertation must register for the appropriate course even if the student is not on campus. The student will defend the dissertation to a committee of at least three committee members. The defense is an open meeting. Steps to Dissertation Completion Once students have completed their program coursework and passed the qualifying examination by successfully defending their dissertation proposals, they must enroll in dissertation hours until the dissertation is completed and approved by their committee and the Office of Graduate Studies or until the student is unable to continue in the program. It is in the best interest of students to finish the dissertation before accumulating 99 credit hours; upon reaching 99 hours, students will be charged non-resident tuition and may not be eligible for assistantships. Working with an Advisor Students should take care when selecting their dissertation advisor and should cultivate a professional relationship with that advisor. The dissertation advisor serves as a guide for the student through the process of dissertation writing. The dissertation advisor will not approve the student to engage in either the proposal or the dissertation hearing until the advisor believes that both are defendable and of high quality. To lessen the number of drafts, it is in the students best interest to ensure that each draft and chapter is proofread before submission to the advisor. Introductory paragraphs and transition sentences must be in place. Students must follow standard grammar and mechanics and the American Psychological Association s (APA) Publication Manual (most current edition). Students are encouraged to buy an English grammar/mechanics handbook, an APA Style Manual, a writing-the-literature-review guide, constructing-data collection-tools books, and a dissertation-how-to book. Students are responsible for cultivating a positive experience with advisors. The Dissertation Committee The dissertation committee is comprised of the student s dissertation advisor (chair of the committee), and two other faculty members from EL. Students may choose additional dissertation committee members from the College or the University or external to the University with the approval of the dissertation advisor. Only faculty from the University will have an official vote on the acceptance or rejection of the dissertation. Writing Process Preparing the Dissertation Proposal Students, in collaboration with their dissertation advisors, should select topics for AY 2015-2016

6 dissertation research that are clearly within the expressed mission and interests of the departmental faculty and that focus on K-16 educational research or policy. Continuous discussion with the dissertation advisor should take place to arrive at a feasible topic for the dissertation. Advisors must approve both the proposal and dissertation before the student may distribute copies to committee members. The dissertation proposal format is determined in consultation with the dissertation advisor. The ELPS department requires a formal dissertation proposal hearing. After receiving approval from dissertation advisor for the completed proposal, a student will provide the proposal to the dissertation committee members at least two weeks before the date of the proposal hearing. This is a closed meeting, attended by the student and the committee only. At the hearing, students should discuss and defend topic selection, research methodology, theoretical frameworks, the review of pertinent literature, and other procedural details. The doctoral committee must approve the proposal before IRB application and data collection. It is very common that the doctoral committee will recommend revisions and changes to the proposal. If the changes are minor, the advisor will make a contract between the student and the doctoral committee outlining the required changes; the student will be granted permission to conduct the research on the condition that the required changes will be made by the time of the final defense. If changes are major, the committee may require another full proposal defense or individual approval. In either case, it is the student s responsibility to make the necessary changes and, if required, resubmit the revised proposal to the committee, again providing two weeks for review. The student may only distribute revised proposals to his or her committee members with the permission of the dissertation advisor. Students must be enrolled in the term in which they plan to defend their proposal. Writing Process Institutional Review Board While waiting on the proposal defense, students should take and pass the human participant research training and acquire a certification for conducting human research. This is an online process and can be found on the UTA Research Training website. Students should print out and save a copy of their certificate verifying a pass on the online examination. A copy of this certificate may be requested with the student s completed IRB application for research approval. Students may begin the IRB human participant training before the proposal has been approved by the dissertation committee but IRB application should not be submitted before proposal approval by the committee. Once the dissertation committee has approved the dissertation proposal, the student should begin work on completing UTA s Institutional Review Board s (IRB) research application forms. Students may be drafting all necessary IRB application forms and be ready to submit after the dissertation committee has approved the proposal. The UTA Research/IRB approval process can take as little as two weeks, or as long as a month or more, depending on the volume of research approvals the Office has received and the

7 level of revisions required. The student cannot begin collecting data until both the doctoral committee has approved his or her dissertation proposal and the UTA Research/IRB has approved the student s application to do research with human subjects. Writing Process Data Collection After receiving approval from both the dissertation committee and IRB, students may begin gathering data. As mentioned above, it is very common to revise dissertation chapters many times before the doctoral advisors certify that students are ready for final defense. Students should arrange a timeline with advisors and be committed to meeting these self (and sometimes advisor) imposed deadlines. While collecting data, students should continue writing on other parts of the dissertation and keep in contact with advisors. Dissertations Students prepare their dissertation in a traditional monograph format. The monograph dissertation The monograph format is a traditional dissertation. A traditional dissertation includes a minimum of five chapters plus references: An introduction, literature review (which may include the theoretical/conceptual framework), methodology and methods, findings and discussion, conclusion and implications, and references, and appendices. In some cases, the theoretical framework and findings and discussion chapters may be separated into separate chapters. The final structure is determined by the student in consultation with the dissertation advisor. Dissertation Defense Students must be enrolled in the term in which they plan to defend their dissertation. Students must apply for graduation at the beginning of the semester in which they plan to schedule their dissertation defense. The graduation application can be found in MyMav and must be completed near the beginning of the final semester (consult Graduate Calendar for specific deadlines). Similar to the proposal defense experience, the dissertation advisor must approve the dissertation before students may submit to committee members. Students must send all committee members the final dissertation no later than two weeks before the final defense. Students are responsible for contacting committee members and scheduling the defense time and location. Students must file a request for the dissertation defense with the departmental Graduate Advisor by the posted deadline. The dissertation defense is a public oral examination open to all members (i.e., faculty, students, and invited guests) of the University community. The dissertation committee will direct the questioning of candidates. All committee members must be present at the defense. Although the defense is concerned primarily with the dissertation research and its interpretation, the examining committee may explore the student's knowledge of areas relevant to the core of the dissertation problem.

8 During the defense, students present an overview of their study and then converse with committee members about their research procedures, findings, and implications. Dissertation members often require additional changes to the dissertation. All of these changes must be made and verified by the dissertation advisor before students can submit the final dissertation to the Library. Occasionally, dissertation committee members may ask to see the revisions before signing approval. Throughout the entire dissertation process, while the advisor does everything possible to ensure the success of the student, the quality of the dissertation and adherence to all guidelines are student responsibilities. The student should comply with the dissertation revision and procedures requirements set forth by the advisor and committee for a successful dissertation defense. Committee members indicate their approval by signing the Dissertation Defense Report, and students then submit the Dissertation Defense Report to the Office of Records. The dissertation defense may result in a decision that the candidate has 1) passed unconditionally; 2) passed conditionally with remedial work specified by the committee; 3) failed, with permission to be re-examined after a specified period; or 4) failed and dismissed from the program. The dissertation must be approved unanimously by the student's dissertation supervising committee. Dissertation Manuscript Preparation 1 The final step in the dissertation process is submitting the manuscript to the Library. For specific guidelines about dissertation manuscript preparation and requirements, students should refer to Library guidelines (http://www.uta.edu/library/etd/). The dissertation must be formatted either in APA style or according to UTA dissertation guidelines. Once finalized, students must upload the dissertation to the UMI/ETD system and continue the process until your document receives final acceptance from the ETD Coordinator. Reasonable Progress toward the Degree Reasonable progress can be measured by these guidelines (as indicated by the OGS website): Coursework normally should be completed no later than 24 months after admission into the doctoral program, following the coursework outlined for the cohort members. A dissertation proposal should be submitted to and approved by the student s doctoral committee no later than 24 months after program admission. Completion of dissertation and oral defense should be completed no later than 36 to 48 months (or three to four years) after program admission. Failure to Make Adequate Progress If a student fails to make adequate progress toward a degree, the advisor will issue a

9 letter indicating such lack of progress and may begin to implement a dissertation contract agreement with the student. If the student does not meet the dissertation contract agreement, then the student may be dropped from the program without completion of the degree. The student must complete the degree requirements (including the completion of an approved dissertation) within four years of the dissertation proposal. 1 The University dissertation submission process is currently under review and may have changed by the time you reach this stage. Confirm the final steps by checking the Office of Graduate Studies website prior to the filing of your dissertation. The student must complete the degree requirements (including the completion of an approved dissertation) within four years of the dissertation proposal.