Similar documents
2010 National Survey of Student Engagement University Report

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

A Decision Tree Analysis of the Transfer Student Emma Gunu, MS Research Analyst Robert M Roe, PhD Executive Director of Institutional Research and

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

National Survey of Student Engagement Spring University of Kansas. Executive Summary

An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Mexican American Studies Participation on Student Achievement within Tucson Unified School District

10/6/2017 UNDERGRADUATE SUCCESS SCHOLARS PROGRAM. Founded in 1969 as a graduate institution.

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity


NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE)

Standard 5: The Faculty. Martha Ross James Madison University Patty Garvin

Appendix K: Survey Instrument

Facts and Figures Office of Institutional Research and Planning

National Survey on First-Year Seminars 2006

Best Colleges Main Survey

A Diverse Student Body

Demographic Survey for Focus and Discussion Groups

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

It s not me, it s you : An Analysis of Factors that Influence the Departure of First-Year Students of Color

Descriptive Summary of Beginning Postsecondary Students Two Years After Entry

2005 National Survey of Student Engagement: Freshman and Senior Students at. St. Cloud State University. Preliminary Report.

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Evaluation of Teach For America:

National Survey of Student Engagement The College Student Report

College of Education & Social Services (CESS) Advising Plan April 10, 2015

Evaluation of a College Freshman Diversity Research Program

SASKATCHEWAN MINISTRY OF ADVANCED EDUCATION

New Jersey Institute of Technology Newark College of Engineering

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

MAINE 2011 For a strong economy, the skills gap must be closed.

ACHE DATA ELEMENT DICTIONARY as of October 6, 1998

Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel

UK Institutional Research Brief: Results of the 2012 National Survey of Student Engagement: A Comparison with Carnegie Peer Institutions

12-month Enrollment

STEM Academy Workshops Evaluation

Table of Contents. Internship Requirements 3 4. Internship Checklist 5. Description of Proposed Internship Request Form 6. Student Agreement Form 7

UDW+ Student Data Dictionary Version 1.7 Program Services Office & Decision Support Group

TRANSFER APPLICATION: Sophomore Junior Senior

Access Center Assessment Report

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

Raw Data Files Instructions

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

Lesson M4. page 1 of 2

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE)

Institution-Set Standards: CTE Job Placement Resources. February 17, 2016 Danielle Pearson, Institutional Research

Junior (61-90 semester hours or quarter hours) Two-year Colleges Number of Students Tested at Each Institution July 2008 through June 2013

REGISTRATION. Enrollment Requirements. Academic Advisement for Registration. Registration. Sam Houston State University 1

University of Arizona

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

SMILE Noyce Scholars Program Application

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

OFFICE OF ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT. Annual Report

Fostering Equity and Student Success in Higher Education

Adapt and Overcome: Helping Student Veterans Transition to Academic Life

Effective Recruitment and Retention Strategies for Underrepresented Minority Students: Perspectives from Dental Students

46 Children s Defense Fund

National Survey of Student Engagement

Office of Institutional Effectiveness 2012 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) DIVERSITY ANALYSIS BY CLASS LEVEL AND GENDER VISION

Shelters Elementary School

Race, Class, and the Selective College Experience

NDPC-SD Data Probes Worksheet

2012 New England Regional Forum Boston, Massachusetts Wednesday, February 1, More Than a Test: The SAT and SAT Subject Tests

HEALTH INFORMATION ADMINISTRATION Bachelor of Science (BS) Degree (IUPUI School of Informatics) IMPORTANT:

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Temple University 2016 Results

U VA THE CHANGING FACE OF UVA STUDENTS: SSESSMENT. About The Study

Undergraduates Views of K-12 Teaching as a Career Choice

Miami-Dade County Public Schools

Meeting these requirements does not guarantee admission to the program.

Graduate Division Annual Report Key Findings

DO SOMETHING! Become a Youth Leader, Join ASAP. HAVE A VOICE MAKE A DIFFERENCE BE PART OF A GROUP WORKING TO CREATE CHANGE IN EDUCATION

Data Diskette & CD ROM

08-09 DATA REVIEW AND ACTION PLANS Candidate Reports

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

NATIONAL CENTER FOR EDUCATION STATISTICS

Master of Science (MS) in Education with a specialization in. Leadership in Educational Administration

Educational Attainment

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

EVALUATION PLAN

Online Family Chat Main Lobby Thursday, March 10, 2016

AP Statistics Summer Assignment 17-18

Annual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent

PUBLIC INFORMATION POLICY

The Diversity of STEM Majors and a Strategy for Improved STEM Retention

CAMPUS PROFILE MEET OUR STUDENTS UNDERGRADUATE ADMISSIONS. The average age of undergraduates is 21; 78% are 22 years or younger.

Augusta University MPA Program Diversity and Cultural Competency Plan. Section One: Description of the Plan

Freshman Admission Application 2016

Undergraduate Degree Requirements Regulations

Practices Worthy of Attention Step Up to High School Chicago Public Schools Chicago, Illinois

Queens University of Charlotte

Doctoral Initiative on Minority Attrition and Completion

Adver sing 2012 Graduate Survey

What Is The National Survey Of Student Engagement (NSSE)?

Transcription:

Texas A&M University-Central Texas Program Review Data Degree Program - BS CS Academic Years 2011-2012 Thru 2016-2017 Table 3. Mean Grade Point Average (GPA) shows the mean GPA of students completing the program and those completing all programs in the college for the last six academic years. The means do not include the GPAs of those who did not complete the program and those who continue to pursue their degree. The university uses a 4.0 grade scale. Program 3.81 3.56 3.12 3.16 3.20 3.17 Freshman 3.00 1.33 Sophomore 3.50-4.00 3.38 2.31 2.75 Junior 3.88 3.44 2.85 2.93 2.84 2.53 Senior 3.88 3.20 3.22 3.41 3.49 Graduate College - Undergraduate 3.01 2.87 2.91 2.95 2.99 2.94 University - Undergraduate 3.05 2.97 2.97 2.98 3.06 3.02 College - Graduate 3.48 3.24 3.22 3.57 3.47 3.44 University - Graduate 3.55 3.48 3.46 3.55 3.55 3.54 Table 5. Annual Unduplicated Headcount shows the six-year annual headcount enrollment of students attending the program in a given year. The counts represents unique students enrolled in a given year. Students enrolling in multiple semesters in a given year are counted once. Students enrolled in multiple years are counted in each year attended. The counts include a student s gender as reported to the institution. Those electing to not report their gender are proportionally distributed by those who did report. Race and ethnicity counts represent the categories indicated by students at time of enrollment. If a student identified with Hispanic ethnicity, the student was included in the Hispanic counts and not counted in the other race categories provided. Other includes all students who identified in categories not presented in the table. Total 4 13 18 35 41 45 Female 1 2 1 4 6 9 Male 3 11 17 31 35 36 White 2 8 14 19 19 14 Hispanic - 1 2 7 6 11 African-American 1 2 1 4 8 11 Other 1 2 1 5 8 9 Table 6. Annual Unduplicated Headcount by Student Classification shows the distribution of enrollments by students classification (freshman, sophomore, junior, senior, post-baccalaureate, and graduate). Classifications represent those of students at the census date of the last semester of the academic year. Total 4 13 18 35 41 45 Freshman - - - - - - Sophomore 1 1 1 4 4 5 Junior 3 6 5 13 13 16 Senior - 6 12 16 20 18 Post Bac - - - 2 4 6 Graduate - - - - - -

Table 7. Fall Number of Applied, Admitted, and Enrolled Students shows the number of applicants, admissions, and new enrollments to the program for the last six years. Applied and admitted only includes students who indicated the program was their intended program when applying to the university. Those enrolled include students who elected the major when applying or when enrolling. Difference indicates students who changed their degree between application and registration. 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 Applied 1 - - 15 24 32 Admitted 1 - - 15 23 32 Enrolled - - - 11 15 12 Difference - - - 4 5 5 Table 8. Student Retention Rates. Fall-to-fall retention rates shown in Table 8 include the percentage of students first enrolled in the fall semester who persisted to the following fall semester. The percentages do not include students who completed the program during the semesters from first enrolling in the fall semester and the following fall semester. 1-Year 5 44% 86% 71% 56% 2-Year 33% 43% 29% 3-Year 22% 4-Year Table 9. Semesters-to-Degree. The number of semesters students take to complete the program, shown in Table 9, includes the students who completed in the academic year indicated. The mean includes the semesters attended by students who completed the program divided by the number of completers in the cohort. The average excludes semesters attended by persisting students or those no longer enrolled. In some cases, a completer s first-time-in-college or first-timetransfer record will have been reported by our parent institution. Those students are excluded from these means. Semester-To-Degree 4.0 4.5 5.1 Table 10. Annual Degrees Awarded shows annual degrees awarded by the program for the last six academic years. Gender and race/ethnicity summaries are disaggregated in the same manner as enrollments. Total - - 2 4 7 - Female - - - - 1 - Male - - 2 4 6 - White - - 1 3 7 - Hispanic - - - 1 - - African-American - - - - - - Other - - 1 - - -

Table 11. Semester Credit Hours Attended by Students in the Program by Level. Semester credit hours attended by students who declared the program as their major in the given academic year are shown in Table 11 by students enrollment classification. Hours include all class enrollments by the students and not just those classes identified for the program (electives and courses required for minors). Total 31 129 325 488 727 600 Freshman - - - - 9 - Sophomore 6 6 3 42 54 51 Junior 25 72 110 142 140 165 Senior - 51 212 289 449 303 Post Bac - - - 15 75 81 Graduate - - - - - - Table 12. Semester Credit Hours Generated by Program Courses provides a list of the courses taught in the program and the total semester credit hours for student attendance. Hours include those taught to students both in and out of the program. (See next sheet for table) Table 13. Sections Held for Program Courses indicates the number of sections of program courses offered each academic year. These sections are offered to students both in and out of the program. (See third sheet in workbook for table) Table 14. University Unduplicated Headcount by Gender and Level includes the university headcount by gender and level using the same methods of disaggregation described for program headcount as a point of comparison. Total 3,336 3,309 3,335 3,440 3,524 3,613 Female 2,109 2,062 2,053 2,105 2,138 2,183 Male 1,227 1,247 1,282 1,335 1,386 1,430 Freshman 27 22 35 24 17 11 Sophomore 165 204 240 242 244 242 Junior 594 669 670 743 744 780 Senior 1,416 1,376 1,477 1,493 1,619 1,645 Post Bac 54 47 49 62 80 99 Graduate 1,079 990 864 876 820 836 PHD Research* 1 1 - - - - *Note: A&M-Central Texas does not have a PhD Research program. The associated headcount in the table were classified as PhD Research by our parent institution.

Table 15. University Semester Credit Hours by Gender and Level. The associated semester credit hours attended by the headcount in Table 14 are included in table 15. Total 44,550 47,567 48,476 49,868 52,944 53,763 Female 28,715 30,215 30,008 30,810 32,798 33,163 Male 15,835 17,352 18,468 19,058 20,146 20,600 Freshman 187 193 258 199 186 83 Sophomore 2,019 2,748 3,191 3,126 3,326 3,262 Junior 9,939 11,565 11,796 12,853 13,374 14,041 Senior 20,139 20,315 22,373 22,778 24,603 24,779 Post Bac 468 561 663 737 1,062 1,223 Graduate 11,792 12,176 10,195 10,175 10,393 10,375 PhD Research* 6 9 - - - - *Note: A&M-Central Texas does not have a PhD Research program. The associated headcount in the table were classified as PhD Research by our parent institution. Table 16. Faculty Demographics indicates unduplicated faculty counts for faculty in the program s department by academic year, rank, gender, and rank/ethnicity. These counts give reviewers an understanding of the faculty credentialed to teach in the department. Total 16 16 13 12 12 13 Professor - - - - - - Associate Professor 1 1-1 1 1 Assistant Professor 4 6 5 4 4 5 Senior Lecturer - - - - - - Lecturer - - 1 - - - Associate Lecturer - - - - - - Assistant Lecturer - - - 1 1 1 Assistant Clinical Faculty - - - - - - Adjunct Faculty 10 8 7 6 6 5 Graduate Assistant - - - - - - Visiting Faculty - - - - - 1 Faculty 1 1 - - - - Female 5 3 3 3 3 2 Male 11 13 10 9 9 11 White 10 10 7 5 6 6 Hispanic - - - - - - African-American - - - - - - Other 6 6 6 7 6 7 Younger than 20 - - - - - - 20-30 - 1 1 - - - 31-40 4 1 2 3 2 3 41-50 1 3 2 2 3 3 51-60 6 6 5 4 4 4 61-65 1 1 1 1 2 2 Greater than 65 4 4 2 2 1 1

Table 17. Demographics for Full-Time Faculty. Of the faculty counted in Table 16, Table 17 includes only those who are employed by the university as full-time employees. This includes faculty who are teaching part time and performing other university functions so long as their total percent of time is reported to the state as one full-time equivalent. Full-Time Total 6 5 4 5 6 6 Professor - - - - - - Associate Professor 1 1-1 1 1 Assistant Professor 4 4 4 3 3 4 Senior Lecturer - - - - - - Lecturer - - - - - - Associate Lecturer - - - - - - Assistant Lecturer - - - 1 1 1 Assistant Clinical Faculty - - - - - - Adjunct Faculty - - - - 1 - Graduate Assistant - - - - - - Visiting Faculty - - - - - - Faculty 1 - - - - - Female 1 1-1 1 1 Male 5 4 4 4 5 5 White 3 2 3 2 2 2 Hispanic - - - - - - African-American - - - - - - Other 3 3 1 3 4 4 Younger than 20 - - - - - - 20-30 - - - - - - 31-40 - - - - 2 2 41-50 1 1 1 2 1 2 51-60 2 1 1 1 2 1 61-65 1 1 1 1 1 1 Greater than 65 2 2 1 1 - -

Table 18 Demographics for Part-Time Faculty. Of the faculty counted in Table 16, Table 18 includes only those who are employed by the university as part-time employees. This excludes faculty who are teaching part time and performing other university functions so that their total percent of time is reported to the state as one full-time equivalent. Part-Time Total 10 11 9 7 6 7 Professor - - - - - - Associate Professor - - - - - - Assistant Professor - 2 1 1 1 1 Senior Lecturer - - - - - - Lecturer - - 1 - - - Associate Lecturer - - - - - - Assistant Lecturer - - - - - - Assistant Clinical Faculty - - - - - - Adjunct Faculty 10 8 7 6 5 5 Graduate Assistant - - - - - - Visiting Faculty - - - - - 1 Faculty - 1 - - - - Female 4 2 3 2 2 1 Male 6 9 6 5 4 6 White 7 8 4 3 4 4 Hispanic - - - - - - African-American - - - - - - Other 3 3 5 4 2 3 Younger than 20 - - - - - - 20-30 - 1 1 - - - 31-40 4 1 2 3-1 41-50 - 2 1-2 1 51-60 4 5 4 3 2 3 61-65 - - - - 1 1 Greater than 65 2 2 1 1 1 1 Table 19. Teaching Load Average Number of Fall and Spring Courses Taught includes the average number of sections taught by full-time faculty in the fall and spring semesters for the department and the university to indicate the instructional load of faculty. No adjustment was made for faculty with administrative workload credits. Program 7.7 5.8 7.4 6.6 6.9 6.4 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.8 4.2 3.3 University - Undergraduate 5.4 4.9 5.0 5.0 4.8 5.3 4.5 4.6 4.4 5.0 4.4 4.3 University - Graduate 4.4 4.5 4.8 4.6 4.6 4.9 3.8 3.4 4.1 4.0 3.8 3.7 Table 20. Student to Faculty Ratio is the ratio of full-time student equivalents to full-time faculty equivalents for students enrolled in the program and university courses for fall semesters. Program 1.3 2.1 6.6 5.1 11.3 7.1 University - Undergraduate 9.4 10.4 11.9 11.3 14.3 12.4 University - Graduate 11.2 12.4 10.4 8.6 13.0 10.4

Table 21. Upon Graduation Employment includes the percentage of those students who completed the graduation survey and indicated one of the following answers to the question: "Upon graduation, which statements are applicable to you (select the best choice)?" I found full-time employment (30 hrs or more per week) 29% I found part-time employment (less than 30 hrs per week) I found an internship after graduation I am attending TAMUCT or another university for a higher degree I am/will be serving in the U.S. Military I am unemployed, actively searching for employment 29% I am unemployed, not searching for employment self-employer/owns business I am retired Survey Respondents 7 Table 22. Marketable Skill: Teamwork includes percentage of those students who completed the graduation survey and indicated one of the following answers to the question: "Please indicate your level of proficiency on the marketable skills you chose below:" Beginner: I'm just now beginning to acquire this skill Developing: I'm improving in this area Competent: I do this skill pretty well Advanced: I'm above average at this skill Expert: Others look to me to teach them this skill Survey Respondents 7

Table 23. Marketable Skill: Writing and Editing Reports-Written Communication includes the percentage of those students who completed the graduation survey and indicated one of the following answers to the question: "Please indicate your level of proficiency on the marketable skills you chose below:" Beginner: I'm just now beginning to acquire this skill Developing: I'm improving in this area Competent: I do this skill pretty well Advanced: I'm above average at this skill Expert: Others look to me to teach them this skill Survey Respondents 0 0 0 0 0 7 Table 24. Marketable Skill: Ethical & Social Responsibility includes the percentage of those students who completed the graduation survey and indicated one of the following answers to the question: "Please indicate your level of proficiency on the marketable skills you chose below:" Beginner: I'm just now beginning to acquire this skill Developing: I'm improving in this area Competent: I do this skill pretty well Advanced: I'm above average at this skill Expert: Others look to me to teach them this skill Survey Respondents 0 0 0 0 0 7 Table 25. Marketable Skill: Quantitative Analysis includes the percentage of those students who completed the graduation survey and indicated one of the following answers to the question: "Please indicate your level of proficiency on the marketable skills you chose below:" Beginner: I'm just now beginning to acquire this skill Developing: I'm improving in this area Competent: I do this skill pretty well Advanced: I'm above average at this skill Expert: Others look to me to teach them this skill Survey Respondents 0 0 0 0 0 7

Table 26. NSSE: Course Challenge includes the percentage of those students who completed the NSSE survey and indicated one of the following answers to the question: "During the current school year, to what extent have your courses challenged you to do your best work?" 1 (Not at All) 2 3 4 5 5 6 5 7 (Very Much) 5 5 Survey Respondents 0 0 0 2 0 2 Table 27. NSSE: Faculty Interaction includes the percentage of those students who completed the NSSE survey and indicated one of the following answers to the question: "Indicate the quality of your interactions with the following people"(faculty) "at your institution." 1 (Poor) 5 2 3 4 5 5 5 6 5 7 (Excellent) (Not Applicable) Survey Respondents 0 0 0 2 0 2 Table 28. NSSE: Educational Experience includes the percentage of those students who completed the NSSE survey and indicated one of the following answers to the question: "How would you evaluate your entire educational experience at this institution?" 1 (Poor) 2 (Fair) 5 3 (Good) 5 10 4 (Excellent) Survey Respondents 0 0 0 2 0 2 Table 29. NSSE: Same Institution includes the percentage of those students who completed the NSSE survey and indicated one of the following answers to the question: "If you could start over again, would you go to the same institution you are now attending?" 1 (Definitely No) 2 (Probably No) 5 5 3 (Probably Yes) 5 5 4 (Definitely Yes) Survey Respondents 0 0 0 2 0 2

Table 30. Texas Exit Cohort Report: The Automated Student and Adult Learner Follow-Up System (ASALFS) tracks graduates, completers, and non-returners from an academic year for employment and additional education. Cohort Group Subtotal 35 21 38 45 57 0 Working Only 13 12 25 27 30 0 Working and Enrolled 11 0 2 4 6 0 All Working 24 12 27 31 36 0 Enrolled Only 3 0 1 2 3 0 All Enrolled 14 0 3 6 9 0 Not Found 8 9 10 12 18 0 Mean Annual Earnings $ 37,084 $ 47,528 $ 39,048 $ 48,188 $ 33,080 $ - Median Annual Earnings $ 36,792 $ 45,480 $ 38,740 $ 41,816 $ 34,496 $ - Employment Rate 69% 57% 71% 69% 63%