No formal designation inspection of Park Lane Learning Trust

Similar documents
Short inspection of Maria Fidelis Roman Catholic Convent School FCJ

Oasis Academy Coulsdon

St Philip Howard Catholic School

Eastbury Primary School

Newlands Girls School

Alma Primary School. School report. Summary of key findings for parents and pupils. Inspection dates March 2015

Putnoe Primary School

St Michael s Catholic Primary School

École Jeannine Manuel Bedford Square, Bloomsbury, London WC1B 3DN

Inspection dates Overall effectiveness Good Summary of key findings for parents and pupils This is a good school

Oasis Academy South Bank

Plans for Pupil Premium Spending

Pupil Premium Grants. Information for Parents. April 2016

5 Early years providers

Exclusions Policy. Policy reviewed: May 2016 Policy review date: May OAT Model Policy

Teacher of English. MPS/UPS Information for Applicants

Approval Authority: Approval Date: September Support for Children and Young People

Total amount of PPG expected for the year ,960. Objectives of spending PPG: In addition to the key principles, Oakdale Junior School:

Archdiocese of Birmingham

St Matthew s RC High School, Nuthurst Road, Moston, Manchester, M40 0EW

Teacher of Psychology and Health and Social Care

PUPIL PREMIUM POLICY

DIOCESE OF PLYMOUTH VICARIATE FOR EVANGELISATION CATECHESIS AND SCHOOLS

Ferry Lane Primary School

Milton Keynes Schools Speech and Language Therapy Service. Central and North West London NHS Foundation Trust. Additional support for schools

Allington Primary School Inspection report - amended

St Matthew s RC High School

Archdiocese of Birmingham

Woodlands Primary School. Policy for the Education of Children in Care

Special Educational Needs and Disability (SEND) Policy. November 2016

Initial teacher training in vocational subjects

Horizon Community College SEND Policy. Amended: June 2017 Ratified: July 2017

Reviewed December 2015 Next Review December 2017 SEN and Disabilities POLICY SEND

CARDINAL NEWMAN CATHOLIC SCHOOL

SEN SUPPORT ACTION PLAN Page 1 of 13 Read Schools to include all settings where appropriate.

Special Educational Needs and Disability (SEND) Policy

The Waldegrave Trust Waldegrave School, Fifth Cross Road, Twickenham, TW2 5LH TEL: , FAX:

Special Educational Needs and Disabilities Policy Taverham and Drayton Cluster

Upper Wharfedale School POSITIVE ATTITUDE TO LEARNING POLICY

SEN INFORMATION REPORT

Idsall External Examinations Policy

Teacher of Art & Design (Maternity Cover)

PUPIL PREMIUM REVIEW

Cottesmore St Mary Catholic Primary School Pupil premium strategy

Diary Dates Half Term First Day Back Friday 4th April

The Holy Cross School Behaviour Policy & Procedure

Version Number 3 Date of Issue 30/06/2009 Latest Revision 11/12/2015 All Staff in NAS schools, NAS IT Dept Head of Operations - Education

LITERACY ACROSS THE CURRICULUM POLICY

Thameside Primary School Rationale for Assessment against the National Curriculum

Pupil Premium Impact Assessment

Evaluation of pupil premium grant expenditure 2015/16 Review Date: 16th July 2016

Special Educational Needs & Disabilities (SEND) Policy

SELF-ASSESSMENT EXTREMISM & RADICALISATION SELF-ASSESSMENT AND RISK ASSESSMENT

29 th April Mrs Diana Dryland Headteacher Bursted Wood Primary School Swanbridge Road Bexley Heath Kent DA7 5BS

AUTHORITATIVE SOURCES ADULT AND COMMUNITY LEARNING LEARNING PROGRAMMES

Principles, theories and practices of learning and development

Changes to GCSE and KS3 Grading Information Booklet for Parents

Special Educational Needs Policy (including Disability)

Curriculum Policy. November Independent Boarding and Day School for Boys and Girls. Royal Hospital School. ISI reference.

Special Education Needs & Disability (SEND) Policy

THE QUEEN S SCHOOL Whole School Pay Policy

South Dartmoor Community College Governing Body

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd. Hertfordshire International College

Casual, approximately 8 hours per week. Director, CLIPP. Employee Name Signature Date

School Experience Reflective Portfolio

INDEPENDENT SCHOOLS INSPECTORATE

This has improved to above national from 95.1 % in 2013 to 96.83% in 2016 Attainment

Job Advert. Teaching Assistant. Early Years Foundation Stage

GCSE Results: What Next? Ü Ü. Norfolk County Council. Are your results better or worse than expected?

ADULT & COMMUNITY LEARNING SERVICE

INTRODUCTION TO TEACHING GUIDE

FARLINGAYE HIGH SCHOOL

Known knowns, known unknowns and unknown unknowns The Six Dimensions Project Report 2017 Nick Allen

Local authority National Indicator Map 2009

GCSE English Language 2012 An investigation into the outcomes for candidates in Wales

BILD Physical Intervention Training Accreditation Scheme

SPEECH GRADUATION ADDRESS MS EVELYN BREUER CHAIRPERSON OF THE POLYTECHNIC COUNCIL

The Curriculum in Primary Schools

Sixth Form Admissions Procedure

MANCHESTER METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY FACULTYOF EDUCATION THE SECONDARY EDUCATION TRAINING PARTNERSHIP MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

PGCE Trainees' Handbook (With Post-16 Enhancement)

PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION

Classroom Teacher Primary Setting Job Description

Pentyrch Primary School Ysgol Gynradd Pentyrch

APPLICANT S INFORMATION PACK

N LLP IT-Comenius -CMP

Language learning in primary and secondary schools in England Findings from the 2012 Language Trends survey

East Riding of Yorkshire SACRE Report 2012/13

Special Educational Needs and Disabilities

Associate Professor of Electrical Power Systems Engineering (CAE17/06RA) School of Creative Arts and Engineering / Engineering

Assessment Pack HABC Level 3 Award in Education and Training (QCF)

DFE Number: 318/3315 URN Number: Headteacher: Mrs C. Moreland Chair of Governors: Mrs. D. Long

Local offer aspect. a) General information. Admission arrangements to schools, settings or FE Colleges

Summary: Impact Statement

Guidance on the University Health and Safety Management System

Inspection report Transylvania College Cluj-Napoca Romania

SEND INFORMATION REPORT

INDEPENDENT STATE OF PAPUA NEW GUINEA.

WOODBRIDGE HIGH SCHOOL

Newcastle Safeguarding Children and Adults Training Evaluation Framework April 2016

Transcription:

Ofsted Piccadilly Gate Store Street Manchester M1 2WD T 0300 123 4234 www.gov.uk/ofsted 20 April 2018 Miss Lisa Corrigan Principal Park Lane Learning Trust Park Lane Exley Halifax West Yorkshire HX3 9LG Dear Miss Corrigan No formal designation inspection of Park Lane Learning Trust Following my visit with Andrew Swallow and Matthew West, Ofsted Inspectors, to your school on 27 March 2018, I write on behalf of Her Majesty s Chief Inspector of Education, Children s Services and Skills to confirm the inspection findings. This monitoring inspection was conducted under section 8 of the Education Act 2005 and in accordance with Ofsted s published procedures for inspecting schools with no formal designation. The inspection was carried out because Her Majesty s Chief Inspector was concerned that the school had not converted to an academy despite the judgement that it required special measures in March 2016. The focus of the inspection was the impact of the actions taken by leaders and managers to address the areas for improvement identified in the section 5 inspection in March 2016. Evidence Inspectors visited a number of lessons covering a range of subjects. Many lesson visits were conducted jointly with members of the senior leadership team. Inspectors also looked at pupils work. The inspection team scrutinised a range of documents during the inspection, including: safeguarding and child protection documents, the record of suitability checks on staff, external reviews, governing body minutes, the school improvement plan, school self-evaluation documents, and attendance and pupil progress information. Inspectors also took into consideration the 69 responses to the Ofsted online parent survey, Parent View, e-mail correspondence from parents and a phone call from a parent.

An inspector held a telephone conversation with the chair of the governing body and a representative from the local authority. An inspector met with the chief executive officer of South Pennine Academies. Having considered the evidence, I am of the opinion that: leaders and managers are not taking effective actions towards the removal of special measures. Context Park Lane Learning Trust is a smaller-than-average-sized secondary school. The proportion of disadvantaged pupils is well above the national average. The proportion of pupils who have special educational needs (SEN) and/or disabilities is also above the national average. Increasing numbers of pupils are joining the school at times other than at the start of the school year. Since the section 5 inspection in March 2016, a number of teachers have left the school. This has led to the recruitment of temporary teachers. The principal has appointed new staff to fill the vacancies. They will take up their posts in April and September 2018. New middle leaders for English, science and modern foreign languages will join the school in April 2018. At the time of this monitoring visit, two years following the judgement of special measures, sponsor arrangements are yet to be finalised. South Pennine Academies is currently providing support for the school. This has included the appointment of a new principal from the trust in May 2017. Inspection findings Since the last inspection, the overall pace of school improvement has been too slow, to the detriment of pupils. Under the leadership of the new principal, with the support from South Pennine Academies, leaders are taking decisive action to more urgently address the areas for improvement. As a result, behaviour is beginning to improve and more effective systems are in place to evaluate the impact of the school s work on improving pupils progress. After the last inspection, governors commissioned a review of funding to support disadvantaged pupils. They also commissioned a review of governance. Governors have not sufficiently addressed the recommendations from both these reviews. Governors have not challenged school leaders effectively about the progress of pupils who benefit from pupil premium funding. As a result, in 2017 outcomes for disadvantaged pupils remained in the bottom 10% nationally. Governors minutes show that they do not challenge leaders effectively. They have not ensured that the areas for improvement identified at the previous inspection have been actioned with urgency.

The new principal has restructured the senior leadership team. Clear lines of accountability are now in place. Current leaders are very clear about the work needed to improve all aspects of the school in order to fully address the areas for improvement identified at the previous inspection. More effective quality assurance procedures are in place to check and evaluate the school s work. Middle leaders are increasingly held to account. They talk positively about the changes introduced in recent months. Middle leaders feel well-supported in their roles. Quality training, and additional support for middle leaders, is beginning to ensure that they more effectively check the quality of teaching and the progress of pupils from their different starting points. The new principal has a clear vision for improving the school. The staff spoken to by inspectors are buoyant in their attitudes. They are fully behind the principal s vision for improvement, despite the challenges faced in recent years. Staff appreciate the recent professional development, including opportunities to share effective practice with teachers from other schools in the trust. In November 2017, leaders initiated a full curriculum review. This has led to a more appropriate curriculum to meet the needs of pupils. Leaders developed the new curriculum in consultation with employers from across the region to ensure a focus on preparing pupils for life beyond school. A part of the curriculum offer is the Park Lane Pledge. This aims to give every pupil the opportunity to learn British sign language, achieve a first aid qualification and provide the opportunity for pupils to join the cadets. Some pupils and parents are unhappy with the new curriculum. Leaders are aware of the need to continue to regularly review the curriculum to ensure it meets the needs of all pupils. Leaders have recently introduced more effective plans to support disadvantaged pupils and pupils in Year 7 who need to catch up. These plans clearly identify the barriers to learning for these pupils. Leaders are aware of the need to ensure that the impact of actions is evaluated more thoroughly so that disadvantaged pupils, and those in need of catch up, make better progress. On her appointment, the principal quickly established that provision was not effective for pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities. Therefore, she commissioned a full review of special educational needs provision. Leaders are currently addressing the recommendations from this review. This includes making sure that all staff effectively plan to meet the needs of pupils who have SEN and/or disabilities by ensuring that strategies identified to support pupils, in their individual education plans, are implemented fully. Some parents express concern that staff do not consistently follow individual education plans. Since the previous inspection, there has been turbulence in staffing. Pupils and parents express concern that this is having a detrimental impact on pupils learning and progress. The new principal has tackled underperformance and has appointed new staff. Many take up their posts in April 2018. However, the quality and

consistency of teaching has not improved sufficiently since the last section 5 inspection. Expectations of what pupils should and can achieve are still not high enough. Pupils have developed poor learning habits in some subjects as a result of teachers expectations being too low. When teachers expectations are high, pupils rise to the challenge and they are fully engaged in their learning. Pupils presentation and pride in their work is too variable. Leaders are now addressing this with the introduction of non-negotiables. Ensuring consistency in the quality of teaching has been challenging due to the high turnover of staff and number of temporary teachers. However, leaders are aware that with more stability in staffing after Easter, the quality of teaching must be addressed with more urgency to ensure that pupils receive a consistent experience. Pupils told inspectors that since the appointment of the new principal, behaviour has improved. Expectations of behaviour have risen. The new behaviour policy, introduced in November 2017, is beginning to have an impact. As a result, the number of behaviour incidents and fixed-term exclusions have reduced. However, leaders acknowledge that exclusions remain too high. Pupils told inspectors that behaviour remains an issue in some lessons, particularly when they have temporary teachers. Corridor behaviour has improved. However, inspectors observed some boisterous behaviour by younger pupils. The pupils that inspectors talked to during the inspection told inspectors that bullying does not happen often. They are confident to tell an adult if they have any concerns. However, some parents, in response to the online Ofsted survey, Parent View, express concern that teachers do not always deal with bullying effectively. Some pupils told inspectors that although staff deal with bullying incidents, sometimes they do not deal with incidents quickly enough. Pupils attendance remains too low. Persistent absence is high, particularly for disadvantaged pupils. Leaders are tackling this with urgency. Actions to increase attendance are beginning to show some improvement, for example in improving the attendance of Year 7 pupils. The new principal has raised the profile of attendance across the school. However, attendance rates for Year 10 and 11 pupils, in particular, continue to remain well below the national average. The vast majority of pupils follow the school s uniform expectations. Pupils look smart in their uniforms. Pupils were polite and courteous to inspectors. They are confident to share and express their views. At the previous section 5 inspection, although safeguarding was effective, an area for improvement was to improve the quality of multi-agency work. Leaders have fully addressed this. They ensure detailed recording of events and actions. Leaders regularly review plans to support vulnerable pupils. Targets to support pupils are clear and specific. Leaders are persistent and tenacious in following up any referrals made to other agencies.

In 2017, pupils made poor progress in their GCSE examinations. The progress made by pupils was significantly below the national average in English, mathematics, science, languages and humanities. Outcomes for all groups of pupils were in the bottom 10% nationally. Disadvantaged pupils made particularly poor progress across their GCSE subjects. Leaders have introduced more effective systems to regularly check pupils progress. Moderation of assessment is now in place across the secondary schools within the trust. This is helping to improve accuracy of teachers assessments. School information shows that current Year 10 and 11 pupils are making better progress this year. However, leaders recognise the need for more accelerated progress to ensure that outcomes are more in line with national averages. External support Support for the school, before South Pennine Academies took on the day-to-day running of the school, had not been effective in halting the decline in standards after the last inspection. Since May 2017, South Pennine Academies has provided a range of support for the school, including the appointment of a new principal and the support from specialist leaders of education in English, mathematics and humanities. The chief executive officer of the trust is regularly in school supporting the work of the senior leadership team. This support is beginning to show positive impact on school improvement. Green shoots of improvement are evident. However, leaders recognise that there is still much work to do to ensure the removal of special measures. I am copying this letter to the chair of the governing body, the regional schools commissioner and the director of children s services for Calderdale. This letter will be published on the Ofsted website. Yours sincerely Michele Costello Her Majesty s Inspector