The Mediation Process:

Similar documents
PREP S SPEAKER LISTENER TECHNIQUE COACHING MANUAL

Red Flags of Conflict

Presented by The Solutions Group

Mastering Team Skills and Interpersonal Communication. Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

RESOLVING CONFLICT. The Leadership Excellence Series WHERE LEADERS ARE MADE

MENTORING. Tips, Techniques, and Best Practices

RESOLVING CONFLICTS IN THE OFFICE

Behaviors: team learns more about its assigned task and each other; individual roles are not known; guidelines and ground rules are established

What s in Your Communication Toolbox? COMMUNICATION TOOLBOX. verse clinical scenarios to bolster clinical outcomes: 1

WELCOME PATIENT CHAMPIONS!

Author: Justyna Kowalczys Stowarzyszenie Angielski w Medycynie (PL) Feb 2015

How to Take Accurate Meeting Minutes

EFFECTIVE CLASSROOM MANAGEMENT UNDER COMPETENCE BASED EDUCATION SCHEME

Identify strategies to use with a difficult customer.

What to Do When Conflict Happens

School Complaints Policy

Effectively Resolving Conflict in the Workplace

Instructional Supports for Common Core and Beyond: FORMATIVE ASSESMENT

CLASS EXPECTATIONS Respect yourself, the teacher & others 2. Put forth your best effort at all times Be prepared for class each day

By Merrill Harmin, Ph.D.

Agree to volunteer at least six days in each calendar year ( (a)(8));

BUS 4040, Communication Skills for Leaders Course Syllabus. Course Description. Course Textbook. Course Learning Outcomes. Credits. Academic Integrity

Creating a Working Alliance: Generic Interpersonal Skills and Concepts

Common Core Exemplar for English Language Arts and Social Studies: GRADE 1

Behavior List. Ref. No. Behavior. Grade. Std. Domain/Category. Social/ Emotional will notify the teacher when angry (words, signal)

The Foundations of Interpersonal Communication

BEST OFFICIAL WORLD SCHOOLS DEBATE RULES

COUNSELLING PROCESS. Definition

BISHOP BAVIN SCHOOL POLICY ON LEARNER DISCIPLINE AND DISCIPLINARY PROCEDURES. (Created January 2015)

Quiz for Teachers. by Paul D. Slocumb, Ed.D. Hear Our Cry: Boys in Crisis

Why Pay Attention to Race?

Biome I Can Statements

E C C. American Heart Association. Basic Life Support Instructor Course. Updated Written Exams. February 2016

Chapter 9: Conducting Interviews

Graduate Student Grievance Procedures

Critical Incident Debriefing in a Group Setting Process Debriefing

Course Law Enforcement II. Unit I Careers in Law Enforcement

Teaching Literacy Through Videos

PREVIEW LEADER S GUIDE IT S ABOUT RESPECT CONTENTS. Recognizing Harassment in a Diverse Workplace

Ohio s New Learning Standards: K-12 World Languages

PART C: ENERGIZERS & TEAM-BUILDING ACTIVITIES TO SUPPORT YOUTH-ADULT PARTNERSHIPS

Coping with Crisis Helping Children With Special Needs

see that few students made As or Bs on the test from C to F, that the median grade was an F and the top grade was a C

BSW Student Performance Review Process

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)

1 Copyright Texas Education Agency, All rights reserved.

Client Psychology and Motivation for Personal Trainers

How to organise Quality Events

Creating Travel Advice

GOLDEN AREAS: classroom management

OUCH! That Stereotype Hurts Cultural Competence & Linguistic Training Summary of Evaluation Results June 30, 2014

The Stress Pages contain written summaries of areas of stress and appropriate actions to prevent stress.

The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages p. 58 to p. 82

Classroom Management that Works: Researched-Based Strategies for Every Teacher By Robert J. Marzano

VIEW: An Assessment of Problem Solving Style

Eliciting Language in the Classroom. Presented by: Dionne Ramey, SBCUSD SLP Amanda Drake, SBCUSD Special Ed. Program Specialist

T2Ts, revised. Foundations

Marketing Management MBA 706 Mondays 2:00-4:50

IUPUI Office of Student Conduct Disciplinary Procedures for Alleged Violations of Personal Misconduct

Sacramento State Degree Revocation Policy and Procedure

WHAT DOES IT REALLY MEAN TO PAY ATTENTION?

Running head: THE INTERACTIVITY EFFECT IN MULTIMEDIA LEARNING 1

Public Speaking Rubric

Handout 2.10a: 24 Operating Principles and the Verbal Behaviors That Go with Them Cultivating Classroom Discourse to Make Student Thinking Visible

University of Waterloo School of Accountancy. AFM 102: Introductory Management Accounting. Fall Term 2004: Section 4

Explorer Promoter. Controller Inspector. The Margerison-McCann Team Management Wheel. Andre Anonymous

Guidelines for Writing an Internship Report

INTRODUCTION TO TEAM & TEAM DYNAMIC

GOLD Objectives for Development & Learning: Birth Through Third Grade

PUBLIC SPEAKING: Some Thoughts

Identifying Students with Specific Learning Disabilities Part 3: Referral & Evaluation Process; Documentation Requirements

Stakeholder Debate: Wind Energy

Evidence-based Practice: A Workshop for Training Adult Basic Education, TANF and One Stop Practitioners and Program Administrators

The EDI contains five core domains which are described in Table 1. These domains are further divided into sub-domains.

RESEARCH INTEGRITY AND SCHOLARSHIP POLICY

Critical Thinking in the Workplace. for City of Tallahassee Gabrielle K. Gabrielli, Ph.D.

The Introvert s Guide to Building Rapport With Anyone, Anywhere

Unit 7 Data analysis and design

Student Assessment and Evaluation: The Alberta Teaching Profession s View

Higher education is becoming a major driver of economic competitiveness

Tutoring First-Year Writing Students at UNM

CLASSROOM PROCEDURES FOR MRS.

Earl of March SS Physical and Health Education Grade 11 Summative Project (15%)

PROCEDURES FOR SELECTION OF INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS FOR THE SCHOOL DISTRICT OF LODI

MAILCOM Las Vegas. October 2-4, Senior Director, Proposal Management BrightKey, Inc.

ACTION LEARNING: AN INTRODUCTION AND SOME METHODS INTRODUCTION TO ACTION LEARNING

2017 FALL PROFESSIONAL TRAINING CALENDAR

How to Repair Damaged Professional Relationships

Assessing speaking skills:. a workshop for teacher development. Ben Knight

Triple P Ontario Network Peaks and Valleys of Implementation HFCC Feb. 4, 2016

STEPS TO EFFECTIVE ADVOCACY

10.2. Behavior models

Administrative Services Manager Information Guide

TEKS Comments Louisiana GLE

Getting a Sound Bite Across. Heather Long, MD ACMT Annual Scientific Meeting Clearwater, FL March 28, 2015

Section 1: Basic Principles and Framework of Behaviour

Interpretive (seeing) Interpersonal (speaking and short phrases)

Reading Project. Happy reading and have an excellent summer!

What Am I Getting Into?

Introduction TO CONFLICT Management

Transcription:

Chapter 6 The Mediation Process: STAGE II Understanding the Parties and Issues Goals To understand each party s interests To identify common ground To hear from each party and the parties to hear each other In this stage the mediator s primary task is to listen. The parties who have come to this session have a lot to say, have strong feelings about the importance of why they are here, and may have very different views of what has happened and why. Often, at this point, there is strong distrust and a demonstrated inability to communicate. People may be focused on assigning blame and determining who is at fault. The mediator, listening to the parties, plays a vital role in redirecting this energy into from what has happened in the past to how to move forward into the future. Parties do not come into this session with neatly identified lists of concerns, interests, or issues to be resolved. Our task as mediators is to help them to translate their views and descriptions into an understanding of issues that can be negotiated. We do this by listening and by demonstrating understanding and respect for who they are, what they know, and where they have been whether or not we agree with actions they have taken or proposals they may make. We check with each party to confirm that we understand what they are saying. We summarize, sorting through a lot of information to determine the key areas of concern, what their causes are, and what concerns are embedded in what they are saying. Our job as mediators is not to decide who is right or wrong. Our job is not to get all of the facts and details so that we can make a decision. The parties, given the opportunity, will tell us what is important to them and why. In addition, as they educate the mediator about the situation from their view, parties are also educating each other about their perspectives and the depth of feeling they have about the situation. People may never agree about the past and individual interpretations of what has happened and why. However, to get to a point of willingness to work together to find a mutually acceptable solution, it is important that they develop a level of respect for the other person and their views. The mediator, through paraphrasing, walking as much as possible in each party s N V M S 2 0 1 1 53

shoes, respecting each of them as they talk while the mediator listens is vital in the process of demonstrating and building this respect. Preparing To Hear From the Parties Change the Direction of Information Flow Until now the parties have been primarily listening to the mediator explain the mediation process and respond to their questions. Now the mediator must reverse that flow by asking the parties to explain their individual perspectives on the problem. Explain Uninterrupted Time to the Parties Tell the parties that each will have an opportunity to speak, uninterrupted, in turn. Do not let talking times get too long. The mediator will move back and forth between the parties. Decide Who Will Speak First Select the party to speak first, either by asking them to agree on who will speak first or by selecting one (usually the complainant, if there is one). Assure each party that, regardless who begins, each will be given the time they need to be heard. Provide Pen and Paper Provide the first non-speaking party with paper and pencil and advise he or she to write down any important points that are heard while listening to the other speak and any perspectives and ideas they wish to talk about regarding the subject under discussion. Repeat this procedure with each party as they prepare to speak. While there are advantages in providing pencil and paper as each party prepares to speak the mediator may provide pencil and paper at the outset to each of the parties at the same time as Uninterrupted Time is introduced. Secure the parties intent and willingness to proceed in this way. Mediator Activities and Techniques Employ a Firm Response to Early Interruptions Be firm about not interrupting each other. You may wish to respond to early interruptions and ignore later ones if they are not especially disruptive. Remind the person interrupting to use the paper you have supplied. Create a Separation between the Presentations of Each Party When shifting between the first and second speaker, create a clear separation between what the first has said and what the second will talk about. Rather than responding or reacting to what the first person has said ask the second person to explain the situation from his or her perspective. Failure to make this clear break can result in the nature of the disagreement being solely defined by the statements and perspectives of the first person to speak. N V M S 2 0 1 1 54

Summarize after Each Person Has Spoken As the mediator moves back and forth between the parties, a summary is always provided before inviting the other party to speak. This provides each party the assurance that he or she has been heard and that their issues are on the table. At the conclusion of both parties speaking time, summarize what you understand are the issues to be addressed in mediation and any commonalities you heard. Do Not Lapse Into Cross-Examination It is easy to begin cross-examining disputants in an attempt to find out what the reality is. However, there is no place for this in mediation. What is important is that each party s perspective is heard and understood. Ask Open Questions Ask open questions to encourage elaboration and to hear what each party believes to be important and significant. Be careful in the use of closed questions. Closed questions can result in the mediator imposing his or her own agenda upon the party. Understanding the Parties & Identifying the Issues Some Useful Questions Please tell me what has brought you here. How is this important to you? How does that affect you? Tell me what your concerns are. Please explain Tell me more Paraphrase Frequently Restate in a sentence, in your own words, what you have heard the party say. This is a perception check. Don t worry if the party corrects your statement. Rather, view corrections as positive. Paraphrasing gives the parties an opportunity to clarify for everyone what was intended. N V M S 2 0 1 1 55

Build Rapport Maintain and enhance rapport with both parties. For example, use emotion labels ( Sounds like you feel frustrated... ), accept statements without agreeing or disagreeing, without judgment, and give equal attention to both parties. Launder Strong Language (see Reframing in Communication Skills) When paraphrasing or using other reflective listening techniques, clean up harsh, barbed, emotionally loaded language while preserving the speaker s intent. Capture the intention without the negative language. Allow the Parties Opportunity to Discuss What Has Been Said. After this uninterrupted time continue to listen to the parties as they discuss what they have heard, to add what they need, and what else needs to be considered. Allow Parties to Vent Allow the parties time to vent to express strong feelings about what has happened and why it is important to them. This will provide the mediator with significant information about what is important to them and why it matters. When people are consumed with strong feelings, they are not able to allow any other views in until they feel that they have been heard in an open and accepting manner. The mediator seeks to normalize strong emotions. Venting also gives the other party an opportunity to understand the depth of feeling the other is expressing. During venting, encourage the parties to describe specific events rather than accusations, generalizations, and labeling the other. Personal attacks on each other can alienate them from hearing and they may miss the content of the concern as they begin looking for ways to defend themselves. Guidelines and Cautions Be Aware Of Non-Verbal Communication Maintain awareness of your body language and facial expressions. Both should reflect a non-judgmental, accepting attitude. Use a Non-Confrontational Tone of Voice Use of an even tone that invites information and encourages participation will enhance the parties confidence in your impartiality. Use of accusatory language or tone of voice and closedended questions can destroy your credibility. N V M S 2 0 1 1 56

Demonstrate Respect for Each of the Parties Be careful that your tone of voice, body language, and the words you choose shows respect for who they are, what they know, and where they have been, regardless of the positions they may be holding in this exchange. CONCLUDING THIS STAGE OF THE MEDIATION Conclude this stage of mediation only after you have fully summarized all of the issues, commonalities, and interests identified by the parties to their satisfaction. Issue: An issue is a problem to be resolved, a subject or topic that can be negotiated. Commonalities: When the mediator can point out things that the parties have in common, they can begin to hear each other in a different way, and respect each other despite their differences. Interests: Interests have to do with the parties goals, concerns, desires, motivations, and possibly things they are trying to avoid. Why resolve this? Parties often need to understand to hear it verbalized why it is in their interest to find a resolution. Create a Mutual Problem-Solving Statement The mediator creates a mutual problem-solving statement that summarizes the issues to be resolved in terms that are acceptable to the parties. N V M S 2 0 1 1 57