Table of Contents. 1.0 INTRODUCTION Background Scope of this Draft EIR Report Organization

Similar documents
SimCity 4 Deluxe Tutorial. Future City Competition

The LAUSD is regulated by the California Education Code and governed by the State Board of Education. SCH No July 2011

Course Description Course Textbook Course Learning Outcomes Credits Course Structure Unit Learning Outcomes: Unit Lessons: Reading Assignments:

Stakeholder Debate: Wind Energy

MEE 6501, Advanced Air Quality Control Course Syllabus. Course Description. Course Textbook. Course Learning Outcomes. Credits.

University of Central Florida Board of Trustees Finance and Facilities Committee

ABI11111 ABIOSH Level 5 International Diploma in Environmental Sustainability Management

Appendix A Cost Estimates

Towards sustainability audits in Finnish schools Development of criteria for social and cultural sustainability

ACHIEVING SUSTAINABILITY THROUGH GREEN OFFICES PRACTICES

Statistical Analysis of Climate Change, Renewable Energies, and Sustainability An Independent Investigation for Introduction to Statistics

2 Participatory Learning and Action Research (PLAR) curriculum

Fruitvale Station Shopping Center > Retail

United states panel on climate change. memorandum

Coimisiún na Scrúduithe Stáit State Examinations Commission LEAVING CERTIFICATE 2008 MARKING SCHEME GEOGRAPHY HIGHER LEVEL

ENVR 205 Engineering Tools for Environmental Problem Solving Spring 2017

COMMUNITY VITALITY DIRECTOR

SCORING KEY AND RATING GUIDE

Our Hazardous Environment

Lesson 1 Taking chances with the Sun

UNITED NATIONS ENVIRONMENT PROGRAMME EVALUATION AND OVERSIGHT UNIT. January, By T. Ngara CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 5

College of Agriculture and Life Sciences Catalog Submitted November 12, 2012 to FSCC

Airplane Rescue: Social Studies. LEGO, the LEGO logo, and WEDO are trademarks of the LEGO Group The LEGO Group.

Mie University Graduate School of Bioresources Graduate School code:25

City of Roseville 2040 Comprehensive Plan Scope of Services

Environmental Subject Working Group. July 15, 2009 Dominguez Community Center, Carson MEETING SUMMARY

2008 TRAFFIC VOLUME COUNTS REPORT

Create A City: An Urban Planning Exercise Students learn the process of planning a community, while reinforcing their writing and speaking skills.

Graduate Studies School of Engineering

Biology and Microbiology

university of wisconsin MILWAUKEE Master Plan Report

TRANSPORTATION TECHNICAL COMMITTEE

Sweetwater Center Collegetown District

LESSON TITLE: The Road to Writing Perfect Paragraphs: Follow The Old Red Trail

MINUTES VILLAGE OF LA GRANGE BOARD OF TRUSTEES REGULAR MEETING. Town Meeting Spring Avenue School (Gymnasium) 1001 Spring Avenue La Grange, IL 60525

FIVE-YEAR CAPITAL PLAN. Approved by the Collierville Board of Education January 27, 2015

DIGITAL GAMING & INTERACTIVE MEDIA BACHELOR S DEGREE. Junior Year. Summer (Bridge Quarter) Fall Winter Spring GAME Credits.

POLICE COMMISSIONER. New Rochelle, NY

Welcome to the University of Hertfordshire and the MSc Environmental Management programme, which includes the following pathways:

HAVE YOU ever heard of someone

Office Address: c/o Hennepin County Medical Center, 701 Park Avenue, Minneapolis, MN 55415

Demographic Analysis for Alameda Unified School District

Director, Ohio State Agricultural Technical Institute

Texas A&M University-Corpus Christi. Environmental Advisory Council Initial Meeting Thursday, November 8, :30 am PP Conference Room.

Read the passage above. What does Chief Seattle believe about owning land?

History of Public Art on Gold Line

This Performance Standards include four major components. They are

BOS 3001, Fundamentals of Occupational Safety and Health Course Syllabus. Course Description. Course Textbook. Course Learning Outcomes.

Milton Public Schools Fiscal Year 2018 Budget Presentation

How can climate change be considered in Vulnerability and Capacity Assessments? - A summary for practitioners April 2011

SOCIAL STUDIES GRADE 1. Clear Learning Targets Office of Teaching and Learning Curriculum Division FAMILIES NOW AND LONG AGO, NEAR AND FAR

Draft Preliminary Master Plan April 18, 2012

What can I learn from worms?

BALTIMORE CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS EDUCATIONAL SPECIFICATIONS PART 1: GENERAL REQUIREMENTS

Keystone Opportunity Zone

Frequently Asked Questions about Music Education at IU

Form A DO NOT OPEN THIS BOOKLET UNTIL THE TEST BEGINS

FOR TEACHERS ONLY RATING GUIDE BOOKLET 1 OBJECTIVE AND CONSTRUCTED RESPONSE JUNE 1 2, 2005

FRAMINGHAM SCHOOL COMMITTEE MEETING MINUTES Superintendent s Conference Room July 15, 2014

TEM. Tribal Energy Management Degree Program San Juan Community College School of Energy

Designing a case study

Like much of the country, Detroit suffered significant job losses during the Great Recession.

Community engagement toolkit for planning

Practical Learning Tools (Communication Tools for the Trainer)

FOREST ECOLOGY FOR 404 FALL SEMESTER 2013

Service and Repair Pneumatic Systems and Components for Land-based Equipment

ENV , ENV rev 8/10 Environmental Soil Science Syllabus

Participation Rates: Fall 2012

The Boston Zoning Variance Database

Description of Program Report Codes Used in Expenditure of State Funds

Transportation Equity Analysis

Organization Profile

STUDENT INFORMATION GUIDE MASTER'S DEGREE PROGRAMME ENERGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES (EES) 2016/2017. Faculty of Mathematics and Natural Sciences

Environmental Sustainability

This document has been produced by:

Financing Education In Minnesota

MAR Environmental Problems & Solutions. Stony Brook University School of Marine & Atmospheric Sciences (SoMAS)

South Dakota Board of Regents Intent to Plan for a Master of Engineering (M.Eng)

Evaluation of the Cocoa Beach Green Business Program

Education. Veterinary Medical Degree, University of Pennsylvania Studies focus on Public Health from a One Health, Place based perspective

Southwood Design Proposal. Eric Berry, Carolyn Monke, & Marie Zimmerman

APRIL 11, 2016 OLATHE PLANNING COMMISSION

4.0 CAPACITY AND UTILIZATION

NET LEASE INVESTMENT OFFERING. ATI Physical Therapy 4765 Jackson Road Ann Arbor, MI 48103

Bachelor of Science in Civil Engineering

Yizao Liu

TK1019 NZ DIPLOMA IN ENGINEERING (CIVIL) Programme Information

For the Ohio Board of Regents Second Report on the Condition of Higher Education in Ohio

30 Jahre Kooperation zwischen TU Darmstadt & Tongji University Shanghai

ANTHROPOLOGY 7/EL CAMINO COLLEGE Rodolfo A. Otero, Ph.D. Section # 2073/ MW 9:30-10:55; ARTB 307 Office Hours: MTWTH 8:30-9:15; Extension: 3578

MISSISSIPPI STATE UNIVERSITY SUG FACULTY SALARY DATA BY COLLEGE BY DISCIPLINE

HOLY CROSS CATHOLIC SCHOOL SCHOOL INFORMATION PROFILE 2015/2016 SCHOOL YEAR

Civil Engineering Undergraduate Degrees 2017

Building Extension s Public Value

MSE 5301, Interagency Disaster Management Course Syllabus. Course Description. Prerequisites. Course Textbook. Course Learning Objectives

Mechanical and Structural Engineering and Materials Science- Master's Degree Programme

Chapter 9 Banked gap-filling

Educational Management Corp Chef s Academy

AGRICULTURAL AND EXTENSION EDUCATION

2014 SYNOPSYS-SONOMA COUNTY SCIENCE FAIR HANDBOOK

Transcription:

1.0 INTRODUCTION... 1-1 1.1 Background... 1-2 1.2 Scope of this... 1-3 1.3 Report Organization... 1-4 2.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY... 2-1 2.1 Purpose... 2-1 2.2 Project Location... 2-1 2.3 Project Description... 2-2 2.4 Project Objectives... 2-7 2.5 Interested Agenices... 2-7 2.6 Summary of Environmental Impacts... 2-7 2.7 Areas of Controversy... 2-8 2.8 Project Alternatives... 2-9 3.0 PROJECT DESCRIPTION... 3-1 3.1 Background... 3-1 3.2 Project Location... 3-1 3.3 Project Objectives... 3-4 3.4 Project Components... 3-5 3.5 Project Characteristics... 3-6 3.6 Intended Uses of this EIR... 3-27 3.7 Scoping... 3-28 4.0 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING, IMPACTS, AND MITIGATION MEASURES 4.1 Aesthetics... 4.1-1 4.2 Agriculture and Forest Resources... 4.2-1 4.3 Air Quality... 4.3-1 4.4 Biological Resources... 4.4-1 4.5 Cultural Resources... 4.5-1 4.6 Geology and Soils... 4.6-1 4.7 Hazards and Hazardous Materials... 4.7-1 4.8 Hydrology and Water Quality... 4.8-1 4.9 Land Use and Planning... 4.9-1 i

4.10 Noise and Vibration... 4.10-1 4.11 Population and Housing... 4.11-1 4.12 Public Services... 4.12-1 4.13 Recreation, Parks, and Open Space... 4.13-1 4.14 Transportation... 4.14-1 4.15 Utilities... 4.15-1 4.16 Greenhouse Gas Emissions... 4.16-1 4.17 Energy... 4.17-1 5.0 ALTERNATIVES... 5-1 5.1 Alternatives Analysis... 5-1 5.2 Summary of Comparative Impacts... 5-34 5.3 Environmentally Superior Alternative... 5-35 5.4 Alternatives Considered and Rejected... 5-36 6.0 CUMULATIVE IMPACTS... 6-1 6.1 Cumulative Methodology... 6-1 6.2 Analysis of Cumulative Impacts... 6-4 7.0 OTHER CEQA REQUIRED DISCUSSIONS... 7-1 7.1 Growth Inducement... 7-1 7.2 Unavoidable Significant Effects... 7-3 7.3 Environmental Effects Found not to be Significant... 7-4 8.0 REFERENCES... 8-1 9.0 REPORT PREPARATION... 9-1 ii

List of Figures Figure 2-1 Project Location Map... 2-3 Figure 2-2 Plan Area and Neighborhoods Map... 2-4 Figure 2-3 New General Plan Land Use Map... 2-5 Figure 3-1 Project Location... 3-2 Figure 3-2 Plan Area and Neighborhoods... 3-3 Figure 3-3 New General Plan Land Use Map... 3-7 Figure 3-4 Existing General Plan Land Use Map... 3-9 Figure 3-5 Focus Areas... 3-16 Figure 3-6 Transportation and Infrastructure Improvements... 3-19 Figure 3-7 Streetcar Network... 3-23 Figure 4.1-1 Plan Area and Neighborhood Map... 4.1-2 Figure 4.1-2 Typical Views Downtown (Historic Courthouse Square and Streetscape)... 4.1-3 Figure 4.1-3 Existing Conditions Downtown (City Hall and Parking Lots)... 4.1-4 Figure 4.1-4a Neighborhoods Stambaugh-Heller/Redwood Village, Centennial, Central, and Palm... 4.1-6 Figure 4.1-4b Neighborhoods Arlington and Sequoia... 4.1-9 Figure 4.1-4c Neighborhoods Canyon, Roosevelt, Friendly Acres, and Oakwood... 4.1-10 Figure 4.1-4d Neighborhoods Woodside Plaza and Farm Hill... 4.1-13 Figure 4.1-5 Typical Views Bayfront Area... 4.1-14 Figure 4.1-6 Typical Views Bayfront and Redwood Shores... 4.1-15 Figure 4.1-7 Unincorporated Neighborhoods Emerald Hills, Selby, and North Fair Oaks... 4.1-17 Figure 4.1-8 Major Gateway and Corridor Location Map... 4.1-19 Figure 4.1-9 Transportation Corridors Woodside Road, El Camino Real, Middlefield Road, and Whipple Avenue... 4.1-20 Figure 4.1-10 Transportation Corridors Broadway, Veterans, Alameda de las Pulgas, Farm Hill Boulevard/Jefferson Avenue... 4.1-24 Figure 4.2-1 Redwood City Important Farmlands and Williamson Act Lands... 4.2-4 Figure 4.3-1 Bay Area Air Quality Trends... 4.3-9 Figure 4.3-2 CARE Communities... 4.3-21 Figure 4.4-1 Hydrologic Features... 4.4-2 Figure 4.4-2 Vegetation Communities... 4.4-6 Figure 4.5-1 Pre-European Settlement and Meseville... 4.5-2 Figure 4.5-2 Early Redwood City Development... 4.5-4 Figure 4.5-3 Early Industries and Development of Redwood City... 4.5-6 Figure 4.5-4 AMPEX Corporate Offices and Farm Hills Subdivision (1995)... 4.5-8 iii

Figure 4.5-5 Farm Hills Subdividion (1958) and Redwood Shores (2000)... 4.5-11 Figure 4.5-6 Residential Building Periods: Redwood City... 4.5-13 Figure 4.5-7 Sequoia High School, Union Cemetery, and County Courthouse... 4.5-15 Figure 4.5-8 Historic Districts... 4.5-16 Figure 4.6-1 Regional Faults... 4.6-4 Figure 4.6-2 Local Fault Locations... 4.6-5 Figure 4.6-3 Seismic Hazards Zones... 4.6-13 Figure 4.7-1 Fire Protection Responsibility Area and Fire Hazard Severity Zones... 4.7-6 Figure 4.7-2 San Carlos Airport Influence Area Zones... 4.7-10 Figure 4.8-1 San Mateo Plain Groundwater Sub-Basin... 4.8-4 Figure 4.8-2 Flood Hazards... 4.8-8 Figure 4.9-1 Existing Land Use... 4.9-5 Figure 4.9-2 Existing Precise Plan Planning Areas... 4.9-11 Figure 4.9-3 Redevelopment Project Area Map... 4.9-13 Figure 4.10-1 Noise Measurement Locations... 4.10-8 Figure 4.10-2 Existing Noise Contours in Plan Area for Major Roadways and Railroads... 4.10-9 Figure 4.10-3 San Carlos Airport Noise Contours (1995)... 4.10-11 Figure 4.10-4 Redwood City Noise Guidelines for Land Use Planning... 4.10-14 Figure 4.10-5 2030 Noise Contours in Plan Area for Major Roadways and Railroads... 4.10-17 Figure 4.11-1 General Population Trends... 4.11-2 Figure 4.12-1 Redwood City Public Services... 4.12-2 Figure 4.12-2 Redwood City Public Facilities... 4.12-8 Figure 4.13-1 Public Parks in Plan Area... 4.13-3 Figure 4.14-1 Roadway Network... 4.14-2 Figure 4.14-2 Existing Conditions AM Peak Hour Segment LOS Summary... 4.14-5 Figure 4.14-3 Existing Conditions PM Peak Hour Segment LOS Summary... 4.14-7 Figure 4.14-4 Existing Bicycle Facilities... 4.14-17 Figure 4.14-5 Existing Transit Service Routes... 4.14-21 Figure 4.14-6 Future (2030) Project Conditions AM Peak Hour Segment LOS Summary... 4.14-37 Figure 4.14-7 Future (2030) Project Conditions PM Peak Hour Segment LOS Summary... 4.14-39 Figure 4.15-1 Redwood City Recycled Water System... 4.15-11 Figure 4.16-1 Sea Level Rise Vulnerability... 4.16-11 Figure 5-1 Alternative 1 Alternative 1 Land Use Map... 5-3 Figure 5-2 Alternative 2 Reduced Buildout Alternative Land Use Map... 5-15 Figure 5-3 Alternative 3 Land Use Map... 5-25 Figure 6-1 Views From Southwestern Hillsides Looking Northeasterly... 6-5 Figure 6-2 Cumulative Conditions AM Peak Hour Segment LOS Summary... 6-25 Figure 6-3 Cumulative Conditions PM Peak Hour Segment LOS Summary... 6-27 iv

List of Tables Table 2-1 Summary of Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures... 2-10 Table 3-1 Locations of Required Elements within New General Plan... 3-6 Table 3-2 New General Plan Land Use Designation Development Standards... 3-10 Table 3-3 New General Plan 2030 Anticipated Development...3-26 Table 4.3-1 Major Criteria Pollutants...4.3-2 Table 4.3-2 California and National Ambient Air Quality Standards (NAAQS)... 4.3-4 Table 4.3-3 Summary of Measured Air Quality Exceedances... 4.3-6 Table 4.3-4 Toxic Air Contaminants in the Plan Area... 4.3-8 Table 4.3-5 Trends in San Francisco Bay Area Air Basin Emissions... 4.3-10 Table 4.3-6 2005 Air Pollutant Emissions Inventory for Ozone Precursors and Particulate Matter for San Mateo County and the Bay Area... 4.3-11 Table 4.3-7 CARB Recommended Setback Distance for Sensitive Uses from Common Sources of Toxic Air Contaminants... 4.3-14 Table 4.3-8 Predicted Roadside 8-Hour Carbon Monoxide Concentrations... 4.3-32 Table 4.4-1 Vegetation Communities in Redwood City... 4.4-5 Table 4.5-1 Redwood City Historic Districts... 4.5-14 Table 4.6-1 Modified Mercalli Intensity (MMI) Scale... 4.6-7 Table 4.9-1 Estimated Development Summary, 2008... 4.9-2 Table 4.9-2 Existing Land Use... 4.9-3 Table 4.9-3 Permitted/Existing Residential Density... 4.9-4 Table 4.9-4 Zoning Districts... 4.9-12 Table 4.9-5 Zoning Code Development Standards... 4.9-14 Table 4.10-1 Common Sound Levels and their Noise Sources... 4.10-2 Table 4.10-2 Definitions of Acoustical Terms... 4.10-3 Table 4.10-3 Typical Levels of Groundborne Vibration... 4.10-4 Table 4.10-4 Long-Term Noise Measurement Results... 4.10-6 Table 4.10-5 Short-term Noise Measurement Locations... 4.10-7 Table 4.10-6 Existing and Future Noise Levels Along Roadways... 4.10-18 Table 4.11-1 Population Trends, 1990-2008... 4.11-1 Table 4.11-2 Population Projections, 2010-2030... 4.11-3 Table 4.11-3 Housing Units, 1990-2008... 4.11-3 Table 4.11-4 Housing Characteristics and Trends... 4.11-4 Table 4.11-5 Households, 2000-2010... 4.11-4 Table 4.11-6 Housing Projections, 2010-2030... 4.11-5 Table 4.11-7 Employment Rates 1990-2009... 4.11-6 Table 4.11-8 Employment Projections, 2010-2030... 4.11-6 Table 4.11-9 Anticipated Development Under New General Plan... 4.11-10 v

Table 4.12-1 Fire Stations Within Plan Area... 4.12-3 Table 4.12-2 Fire Department Calls from January to December 2008... 4.12-4 Table 4.12-3 Redwood City Fire Department Average Response Times/Station.. 4.12-4 Table 4.12-4 Redwood City School District Facilities... 4.12-7 Table 4.12-5 Belmont-Redwood Shores School District Facilities... 4.12-9 Table 4.12-6 Sequoia Union High School District Facilities... 4.12-10 Table 4.12-7 Public/Private Preschools and Child Care Centers in Redwood City... 4.12-11 Table 4.12-8 Child Care Need Estimate... 4.12-12 Table 4.13-1 Public Park and Recreation Lands within the Plan Area... 4.13-2 Table 4.13-2 Redwood City Mini Parks... 4.13-5 Table 4.13-3 Redwood City Neighborhood Parks... 4.13-6 Table 4.13-4 Redwood City Community Parks... 4.13-6 Table 4.13-5 Redwood City Special Use Facilities... 4.13-7 Table 4.13-6 Redwood City School Parks... 4.13-8 Table 4.13-7 Other Plan Area Parklands... 4.13-8 Table 4.13-8 Redwood City Community Centers... 4.13-9 Table 4.13-9 Redwood City Open Space Areas... 4.13-11 Table 4.13-10 Redwood City Park Maintenance and Improvement Activities... 4.13-16 Table 4.14-1 Roadway Segment LOS Thresholds (Bi-Directional) 1, 2... 4.14-9 Table 4.14-2 Existing (2008) Roadway Segment Levels of Service Summary... 4.14-10 Table 4.14-3 Redwood City Traffic Collisions and Rankings, 2008... 4.14-14 Table 4.14-4 Pedestrian-Vehicle Collision Locations in Redwood City (January 1997 to April 2008)... 4.14-16 Table 4.14-5 Future (2030) Project Roadway Segment Levels of Service Summary... 4.14-32 Table 4.14-6 Roadway Segments Considered for Pedestrian Enhanced Design (PED) Level of Service Summary... 4.14-63 Table 4-15.1 Current and Planned Water Supplies in acre-feet per year (afy)... 4.15-2 Table 4.15-2 Redwood City Potable Water Purchase History (afy)... 4.15-5 Table 4.15-3 Wastewater Collected, Treated, and Discharged in Redwood City (afy)... 4.15-7 Table 4.15-4 Projected Recycled Water Demand in Redwood City (afy)... 4.15-7 Table 4.15-5 Solid Waste Disposal Facilities Used by Redwood City... 4.15-14 Table 4.15-6 Redwood City 2030 Potable Water Demand (afy)... 4.15-23 Table 4.15-7 Solid Waste Generated from the New General Plan... 4.15-28 Table 4.16-1 Global Warming Potential for Greenhouse Gases... 4.16-5 Table 4.16-2 Estimated Greenhouse Gas Emissions for Plan Area, 2008... 4.16-8 Table 4.16-3 GHG Emissions Reduction Strategy Consistency... 4.16-19 Table 4.16-4 Estimated CO2 Emissions 2008, 2020, and 2030 and Per Capita Emissions Calculations... 4.16-31 Table 4.16-5 Estimated VMT: Base Year, 2020 and 2030 Scenarios... 4.16-33 Table 4.16-6 Comparison of Project and Project Alternatives... 4.16-34 vi

Table 4.16-7 Estimated CO2 Emissions and Per Capita Emissions Calculations, Project and Alternative 2... 4.16-35 Table 4.16-8 Estimated CO2 Emissions and Per Capita Emissions Calculations, Project and Cumulative Scenarios... 4.16-36 Table 4.17-1 Estimated Average Annual Energy Use... 4.17-7 Table 5-1 Alternative 1 2030 Development Comparison... 5-5 Table 5-2 Alternative 2 2030 Development Comparison... 5-17 Table 5-3 Alternative 3 2030 Development Comparison... 5-26 Table 5-4 Comparison of Impact Severity of Alternatives to the New General Plan... 5-34 Table 6-1 Existing and Future Noise Levels Along Roadways... 6-18 Table 6-2 New General Plan and Cumulative Roadway Segment Levels of Service Summary... 6-30 Table 7-1 Plan Area Development Changes... 7-2 vii

List of Appendices Appendix A Appendix B Appendix C Appendix D Appendix E Appendix F Appendix G Appendix H Goals, Policies, and Programs of New General Plan Justification of Assumptions for Assumed Development Notice of Preparation Scoping Comments Greenhouse Gas/Air Quality Background Potential Plant and Animal Species Occurring in the Plan Area Redwood City Known Historic Resources Hazardous Materials Sites Redwood City General Plan Noise and Vibration Background Report viii