ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY COURSE OUTLINE FORM COLLEGE OF SCIENCE. School of Mathematical Sciences

Similar documents
Self Study Report Computer Science

Mathematics Program Assessment Plan

Practical Research. Planning and Design. Paul D. Leedy. Jeanne Ellis Ormrod. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey Columbus, Ohio

Level 6. Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) Fee for 2017/18 is 9,250*

KUTZTOWN UNIVERSITY KUTZTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA COE COURSE SYLLABUS TEMPLATE

PELLISSIPPI STATE TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE MASTER SYLLABUS APPLIED MECHANICS MET 2025

University of Massachusetts Lowell Graduate School of Education Program Evaluation Spring Online

Timeline. Recommendations

Content Teaching Methods: Social Studies. Dr. Melinda Butler

CAAP. Content Analysis Report. Sample College. Institution Code: 9011 Institution Type: 4-Year Subgroup: none Test Date: Spring 2011

DBA Program Curriculum

4. Long title: Emerging Technologies for Gaming, Animation, and Simulation

Statistics and Data Analytics Minor

STA 225: Introductory Statistics (CT)

KUTZTOWN UNIVERSITY KUTZTOWN, PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF SECONDARY EDUCATION COLLEGE OF EDUCATION

Introduction to Simulation

1. Programme title and designation International Management N/A

PELLISSIPPI STATE TECHNICAL COMMUNITY COLLEGE MASTER SYLLABUS APPLIED STATICS MET 1040

EQuIP Review Feedback

Highlighting and Annotation Tips Foundation Lesson

Document number: 2013/ Programs Committee 6/2014 (July) Agenda Item 42.0 Bachelor of Engineering with Honours in Software Engineering

This Performance Standards include four major components. They are

Graduate Program in Education

B.S/M.A in Mathematics

Professional Learning Suite Framework Edition Domain 3 Course Index

Language Arts Methods

Note: Principal version Modification Amendment Modification Amendment Modification Complete version from 1 October 2014

The Effect of Time to Know Environment on Math and English Language Arts Learning Achievements (Poster)

Shank, Matthew D. (2009). Sports marketing: A strategic perspective (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.

KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING

EGRHS Course Fair. Science & Math AP & IB Courses

Writing for the AP U.S. History Exam

WHY SOLVE PROBLEMS? INTERVIEWING COLLEGE FACULTY ABOUT THE LEARNING AND TEACHING OF PROBLEM SOLVING

Maintaining Resilience in Teaching: Navigating Common Core and More Site-based Participant Syllabus

ENVR 205 Engineering Tools for Environmental Problem Solving Spring 2017

Learning Disability Functional Capacity Evaluation. Dear Doctor,

The Use of Statistical, Computational and Modelling Tools in Higher Learning Institutions: A Case Study of the University of Dodoma

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY HANDBOOK

GRADUATE COLLEGE Dual-Listed Courses

Integrating simulation into the engineering curriculum: a case study

ARTICULATION AGREEMENT

SCNS changed to MUM 2634

LIS 681 Books and Media for Children Spring 2009

MBA 510: Critical Thinking for Managers

Unit 3. Design Activity. Overview. Purpose. Profile

Assessment for Student Learning: Institutional-level Assessment Board of Trustees Meeting, August 23, 2016

BSM 2801, Sport Marketing Course Syllabus. Course Description. Course Textbook. Course Learning Outcomes. Credits.

Ph.D. in Behavior Analysis Ph.d. i atferdsanalyse

Mathematics subject curriculum

Learn & Grow. Lead & Show

George Mason University Graduate School of Education Program: Special Education

ACTL5103 Stochastic Modelling For Actuaries. Course Outline Semester 2, 2014

Requirements for the Degree: Bachelor of Science in Education in Early Childhood Special Education (P-5)

SAM - Sensors, Actuators and Microcontrollers in Mobile Robots

Texas Woman s University Libraries

EECS 700: Computer Modeling, Simulation, and Visualization Fall 2014

ITED350.02W Spring 2016 Syllabus

EDIT 576 DL1 (2 credits) Mobile Learning and Applications Fall Semester 2014 August 25 October 12, 2014 Fully Online Course

COMMUNICATION AND JOURNALISM Introduction to Communication Spring 2010

PH.D. IN COMPUTER SCIENCE PROGRAM (POST M.S.)

ME 4495 Computational Heat Transfer and Fluid Flow M,W 4:00 5:15 (Eng 177)

Lahore University of Management Sciences. FINN 321 Econometrics Fall Semester 2017

HDR Presentation of Thesis Procedures pro-030 Version: 2.01

Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts

Master s Programme in European Studies

Writing an Effective Research Proposal

ELA Grade 4 Literary Heroes Technology Integration Unit

Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District. B or better in Algebra I, or consent of instructor

Arizona s English Language Arts Standards th Grade ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS

George Mason University Graduate School of Education Education Leadership Program. Course Syllabus Spring 2006

ACCT 100 Introduction to Accounting Course Syllabus Course # on T Th 12:30 1:45 Spring, 2016: Debra L. Schmidt-Johnson, CPA

Control Tutorials for MATLAB and Simulink

Norms How were TerraNova 3 norms derived? Does the norm sample reflect my diverse school population?

CS/SE 3341 Spring 2012

Physics 270: Experimental Physics

PROGRAMME SPECIFICATION UWE UWE. Taught course. JACS code. Ongoing

Degree Qualification Profiles Intellectual Skills

College Pricing. Ben Johnson. April 30, Abstract. Colleges in the United States price discriminate based on student characteristics

Maximizing Learning Through Course Alignment and Experience with Different Types of Knowledge

EDIT 576 (2 credits) Mobile Learning and Applications Fall Semester 2015 August 31 October 18, 2015 Fully Online Course

Texas A&M University - Central Texas PSYK PRINCIPLES OF RESEARCH FOR THE BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES. Professor: Elizabeth K.

Individual Interdisciplinary Doctoral Program Faculty/Student HANDBOOK

I. PREREQUISITE For information regarding prerequisites for this course, please refer to the Academic Course Catalog.

Course Syllabus Art History I ARTS 1303

PROGRAMME SYLLABUS International Management, Bachelor programme, 180

Biological Sciences, BS and BA

Firms and Markets Saturdays Summer I 2014

Mathematics. Mathematics

HSMP 6611 Strategic Management in Health Care (Strg Mgmt in Health Care) Fall 2012 Thursday 5:30 7:20 PM Ed 2 North, 2301

Adler Graduate School

Lab 1 - The Scientific Method

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE)

Social Media Marketing BUS COURSE OUTLINE

ACC 362 Course Syllabus

COUN 522. Career Development and Counseling

Sociology. M.A. Sociology. About the Program. Academic Regulations. M.A. Sociology with Concentration in Quantitative Methodology.

Math 181, Calculus I

Anthropology Graduate Student Handbook (revised 5/15)

Dale Carnegie Final Results Package. For. Dale Carnegie Course DC218 Graduated 6/19/13

National Survey of Student Engagement (NSSE) Temple University 2016 Results

Transcription:

! ROCHESTER INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY COURSE OUTLINE FORM COLLEGE OF SCIENCE School of Mathematical Sciences New Revised COURSE: COS-MATH-421 Mathematical Modeling 1.0 Course designations and approvals: Required Course Approvals: Approval Approval Request Date Grant Date Academic Unit Curriculum Committee 4-08-10 4-15-10 College Curriculum Committee 11-01-10 12-17-10 Optional Course Designations: Yes No General Education Writing Intensive Honors Approval Request Date Approval Grant Date 2.0 Course information: Course Title: Mathematical Modeling Credit Hours: 3 Prerequisite(s): COS-MATH-221, -231, -241, and -251 Co-requisite(s): None Course proposed by: School of Mathematical Sciences Effective date: Fall 2013 Contact Hours Maximum Students/section Classroom 3 20 Lab Workshop Other (specify) 2.1 Course conversion designation: (Please check which applies to this course) Semester Equivalent (SE) to: 1016-461 Semester Replacement (SR) to: New 2.2 Semester(s) offered: Fall Spring Summer Offered every other year only Other Page 1 of 5

2.3 Student requirements: Students required to take this course: (by program and year, as appropriate) Fourth-year Applied Mathematics and Computational Mathematics majors Students who might elect to take the course: Applied Statistics majors and Mathematics minors 3.0 Goals of the course: (including rationale for the course, when appropriate) 3.1 To survey the types of mathematical models one frequently encounters such as deterministic models, stochastic models, axiomatic models, and simulation models. 3.2 To describe the generic modeling process including a discussion of modeling assumptions, reliability of data, testing of a model against data, and the necessity of criticizing the model. 3.3 To apply the modeling process to three or four substantial examples drawn from among the physical sciences, engineering, and the social sciences. 3.4 To provide an opportunity to produce a substantial modeling project. 4.0 Course description: (as it will appear in the RIT Catalog, including pre- and co-requisites, semesters offered) COS-MATH-421 Mathematical Modeling This course explores problem solving, formulation of the mathematical model from physical considerations, solution of the mathematical problem, testing the model, and interpretation of results. Problems are selected from the physical sciences, engineering, and economics. (COS-MATH-221, -231, -241, and -251) Class 3, Credit 3 (F) 5.0 Possible resources: (texts, references, computer packages, etc.) 5.1 Richard Haberman, Mathematical Models: Mechanical Vibrations, Population Dynamics, and Traffic Flow, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. 5.2 Walter J. Meyer, Concepts of Mathematical Modeling, McGraw-Hill, Columbus, OH. 5.3 TEAM Learning Modules, Mathematical Association of America, Washington, DC. 6.0 Topics: (outline) Topics with an asterisk(*) are at the instructor s discretion, as time permits 6.1 Description of the Generic Modeling Process 6.1.1 The necessity of simplifying assumptions 6.1.2 Modeling as problem solving 6.1.3 Types of data 6.1.4 Continuous versus stochastic models 6.1.5 Testing and criticism of a model 6.2 Review of Model Types with Brief Examples 6.2.1 Deterministic models 6.2.2 Stochastic models Page 2 of 5

6.2.3 Axiomatic models 6.2.4 Simulation models 6.3 Three or four example models such as 6.3.1 Differential equations and phase plane analysis for the damped and undamped pendulum 6.3.2 Richardson s model for an arms race 6.3.3 Regular and absorbing Markov chains such as gambler s ruin 6.3.4 Leontief model for an open economy 6.4 6.4.1 Discussion of stylistic elements in a technical report 6.4.2 Selection of topic in consultation with the instructor 6.4.3 Proposal approved by instructor 6.4.4 Draft of written report 6.4.5 Final written report 7.0 Intended learning outcomes and associated assessment methods of those outcomes: Assessment Methods Learning Outcomes 7.1 Students will recognize the various types of mathematical models such as deterministic models, stochastic models, axiomatic models, and simulation models 7.2 Students will describe the generic modeling process including validation of modeling assumptions, determining the reliability of data, testing of a model against data, and the necessity of criticizing the model 7.3 Students will apply the modeling process to several examples drawn from among the physical sciences, engineering, and the social sciences, and produce a brief written analysis of the models 7.4 Students will produce a substantial mathematical model, and write a high-quality, thorough report detailing the model s scope, and analyzing the conclusions that can be drawn from it 8.0 Program goals supported by this course: 8.1 To develop an understanding of the mathematical framework that supports engineering, science, and mathematics. 8.2 To develop critical and analytical thinking. Page 3 of 5

8.3 To develop an appropriate level of mathematical literacy and competency. 8.4 To provide an acquaintance with mathematical notation used to express physical and natural laws. 8.5 To produce graduates who can effectively use mathematics and/or statistics to model, analyze, and solve problems arising in science, engineering, business, and other disciplines. 9.0 General education learning outcomes and/or goals supported by this course: Assessment Methods General Education Learning Outcomes 9.1 Communication Express themselves effectively in common college-level written forms using standard American English Revise and improve written and visual content Express themselves effectively in presentations, either in spoken standard American English or sign language (American Sign Language or English-based Signing) Comprehend information accessed through reading and discussion 9.2 Intellectual Inquiry Review, assess, and draw conclusions about hypotheses and theories Analyze arguments, in relation to their premises, assumptions, contexts, and conclusions Construct logical and reasonable arguments that include anticipation of counterarguments Use relevant evidence gathered through accepted scholarly methods and properly acknowledge sources of information 9.3 Ethical, Social and Global Awareness Analyze similarities and differences in human experiences and consequent perspectives Examine connections among the world s populations Identify contemporary ethical questions and relevant stakeholder positions 9.4 Scientific, Mathematical and Technological Literacy Explain basic principles and concepts of one of the natural sciences Page 4 of 5

Assessment Methods General Education Learning Outcomes Apply methods of scientific inquiry and problem solving to contemporary issues Comprehend and evaluate mathematical and statistical information Perform college-level mathematical operations on quantitative data Describe the potential and the limitations of technology Use appropriate technology to achieve desired outcomes 9.5 Creativity, Innovation and Artistic Literacy Demonstrate creative/innovative approaches to coursebased assignments or projects Interpret and evaluate artistic expression considering the cultural context in which it was created 10.0 Other relevant information: (such as special classroom, studio, or lab needs, special scheduling, media requirements, etc.) The in this class (see Topic 6.4) will constitute at least 20% of the overall grade (the portion of the overall grade determined by the project has varied from 30 50% in previous terms) Students will receive written feedback from the instructor regarding the rough draft of their final report (see Topic 6.4), and are expected to implement revisions accordingly. Page 5 of 5