Similar documents
TRAITS OF GOOD WRITING

Textbook: American Literature Vol. 1 William E. Cain /Pearson Ed. Inc. 2004

November 2012 MUET (800)

Facing our Fears: Reading and Writing about Characters in Literary Text

Arizona s English Language Arts Standards th Grade ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS

ASSESSMENT GUIDELINES (PRACTICAL /PERFORMANCE WORK) Grade: 85%+ Description: 'Outstanding work in all respects', ' Work of high professional standard'

BENGKEL 21ST CENTURY LEARNING DESIGN PERINGKAT DAERAH KUNAK, 2016

Rubric for Scoring English 1 Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis

Myths, Legends, Fairytales and Novels (Writing a Letter)

Reading Project. Happy reading and have an excellent summer!

Achievement Level Descriptors for American Literature and Composition

Grade 4. Common Core Adoption Process. (Unpacked Standards)

CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

Multi-genre Writing Assignment

Project Based Learning Debriefing Form Elementary School

English 491: Methods of Teaching English in Secondary School. Identify when this occurs in the program: Senior Year (capstone course), week 11

CREATE YOUR OWN INFOMERCIAL

With guidance, use images of a relevant/suggested. Research a

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT If sub mission ins not a book, cite appropriate location(s))

Welcome to the Purdue OWL. Where do I begin? General Strategies. Personalizing Proofreading

The College Board Redesigned SAT Grade 12

FOR TEACHERS ONLY. The University of the State of New York REGENTS HIGH SCHOOL EXAMINATION. ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS (Common Core)

ENGLISH. Progression Chart YEAR 8

Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts

MASTER S THESIS GUIDE MASTER S PROGRAMME IN COMMUNICATION SCIENCE

Mathematics Scoring Guide for Sample Test 2005

Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium: Brief Write Rubrics. October 2015

Statistical Analysis of Climate Change, Renewable Energies, and Sustainability An Independent Investigation for Introduction to Statistics

Introducing the New Iowa Assessments Language Arts Levels 15 17/18

Khairul Hisyam Kamarudin, PhD 22 Feb 2017 / UTM Kuala Lumpur

Epping Elementary School Plan for Writing Instruction Fourth Grade

Spanish IV Textbook Correlation Matrices Level IV Standards of Learning Publisher: Pearson Prentice Hall

Pre-AP English 1-2. Mrs. Kimberly Cloud Career Tech & Global Studies Room N-201

Student Name: OSIS#: DOB: / / School: Grade:

Improvement of Writing Across the Curriculum: Full Report. Administered Spring 2014

MYP Language A Course Outline Year 3

HISTORY COURSE WORK GUIDE 1. LECTURES, TUTORIALS AND ASSESSMENT 2. GRADES/MARKS SCHEDULE

Prentice Hall Literature Common Core Edition Grade 10, 2012

Sectionalism Prior to the Civil War

9779 PRINCIPAL COURSE FRENCH

The Writing Process. The Academic Support Centre // September 2015

Scoring Guide for Candidates For retake candidates who began the Certification process in and earlier.

1. Answer the questions below on the Lesson Planning Response Document.

CHEM 591 Seminar in Inorganic Chemistry

Grade 6: Module 3A: Unit 2: Lesson 11 Planning for Writing: Introduction and Conclusion of a Literary Analysis Essay

2006 Mississippi Language Arts Framework-Revised Grade 12

The Task. A Guide for Tutors in the Rutgers Writing Centers Written and edited by Michael Goeller and Karen Kalteissen

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes, Platinum 2000 Correlated to Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards (Grade 10)

Adolescence and Young Adulthood / English Language Arts. Component 1: Content Knowledge SAMPLE ITEMS AND SCORING RUBRICS

Graduate Program in Education

Planning a Dissertation/ Project

Candidates must achieve a grade of at least C2 level in each examination in order to achieve the overall qualification at C2 Level.

Teachers Guide Chair Study

Biome I Can Statements

WebQuest - Student Web Page

Literature and the Language Arts Experiencing Literature

Reading Grammar Section and Lesson Writing Chapter and Lesson Identify a purpose for reading W1-LO; W2- LO; W3- LO; W4- LO; W5-

Physics 270: Experimental Physics

MANCHESTER METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY

Guidelines for Writing an Internship Report

George Mason University Graduate School of Education Program: Special Education

Technical Manual Supplement

Big Fish. Big Fish The Book. Big Fish. The Shooting Script. The Movie

CARITAS PROJECT GRADING RUBRIC

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS GUIDELINES

This publication is also available for download at

Grade 6: Module 4: Unit 3: Overview

Handbook for Teachers

Graduate/Professional School Overview

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes Gold 2000 Correlated to Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards, (Grade 9)

Writing the Personal Statement

Unit Lesson Plan: Native Americans 4th grade (SS and ELA)

Tutoring First-Year Writing Students at UNM

Highlighting and Annotation Tips Foundation Lesson

St. Martin s Marking and Feedback Policy

DESIGNPRINCIPLES RUBRIC 3.0

Think A F R I C A when assessing speaking. C.E.F.R. Oral Assessment Criteria. Think A F R I C A - 1 -

Earl of March SS Physical and Health Education Grade 11 Summative Project (15%)

Grade 5: Module 3A: Overview

Grade 11 Language Arts (2 Semester Course) CURRICULUM. Course Description ENGLISH 11 (2 Semester Course) Duration: 2 Semesters Prerequisite: None

ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS - WRITING THIRD GRADE FIFTH GRADE

Oakland Unified School District English/ Language Arts Course Syllabus

Grade 6: Module 2A Unit 2: Overview

Last Editorial Change:

Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District. B or better in Algebra I, or consent of instructor

The specific Florida Educator Accomplished Practices (FEAP) addressed in this course are:

What is a number sentence example >>>CLICK HERE<<<

2 nd grade Task 5 Half and Half

Comprehension Recognize plot features of fairy tales, folk tales, fables, and myths.

A. True B. False INVENTORY OF PROCESSES IN COLLEGE COMPOSITION

Senior Project Information

MADERA SCIENCE FAIR 2013 Grades 4 th 6 th Project due date: Tuesday, April 9, 8:15 am Parent Night: Tuesday, April 16, 6:00 8:00 pm

A Correlation of. Grade 6, Arizona s College and Career Ready Standards English Language Arts and Literacy

Twenty-One Suggestions for Writing Good Scientific Papers. Michal Delong and Ken Lertzman. 1. Know your audience and write for that specific audience.

GENERAL COMPETITION INFORMATION

ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR GENERAL EDUCATION CATEGORY 1C: WRITING INTENSIVE

RUBRICS FOR M.TECH PROJECT EVALUATION Rubrics Review. Review # Agenda Assessment Review Assessment Weightage Over all Weightage Review 1

Supervised Agriculture Experience Suffield Regional 2013

MGMT 3362 Human Resource Management Course Syllabus Spring 2016 (Interactive Video) Business Administration 222D (Edinburg Campus)

English Language Arts Scoring Guide for Sample Test 2005

Transcription:

Outstanding Meritorious Substantial Adequate Moderate Elementary Not achieved - Language, punctuation - Language, punctuation - Language and punctuation - Language simplistic, - Language ordinary and - Language and punctuation - Language and punctuation ENGLISH FIRST ADDITIONAL RUBRIC effectively used. Uses figurative language appropriately. correct, and able to include figurative language correctly. mostly correct. - Choice of words suited to text. punctuation adequate. - Choice of words adequate. - Sentences, paragraphing punctuation often inaccurately used. - Choice of words basic. flawed. - Choice of words limited. - Sentences, paragraphs seriously flawed. - Choice of words inappropriate. NSC - Choice of words - Choice of words varied and - Sentences, paragraphs might be faulty in places but - Sentences, paragraphs, constructed at an - Sentences, paragraphs highly appropriate. Correctly used. well constructed. essay still makes sense. faulty but ideas can be elementary muddled, inconsistent. SECTION A: - Sentences, paragraphs - Sentences, paragraphs - Style, tone, register suited to - Style, tone, register generally understood. level. - Style, tone, register flawed ESSAY coherently constructed. logical, varied. topic in most of the essay. consistent with topic - Style, tone, register lacking - Style, tone, register in all aspects. - Style, tone, register highly - Style, tone, register - Text by and large error-free requirements. in coherence. inappropriate. - Text error-ridden and suited to appropriately suited to following proof-reading, - Text still contains errors - Text contains several errors - Text error-ridden despite confused following proof- 50 MARKS - Text virtually error-free - Text largely error-free following proof-reading, following proof-reading, proof-reading, reading, following proof-reading, following proof-reading, - Length correct. - Length too long / short - Length far too long / short -Length correct. - Length too long / short. - Length in accordance with - Length correct. requirements of CONTENT Code 7: 80 100% Code 6: 70 79% Code 5: 60 69% Code 4: 50 59% Code 3: 40 49% Code 2: 30 39% Code 1: 00 29% Outstanding - Content shows impressive insight into - Ideas: thought-provoking, mature. - Coherent development of Vivid detail. - Critical awareness of impact of language. has produced virtually flawless, presentable essay. Meritorious - Content shows thorough interpretation of - Ideas: imaginative, interesting. - Logical development of details. Coherent. - Critical awareness of impact of language. has produced a well crafted, presentable essay. Substantial - Content shows a sound interpretation of - Ideas: interesting, convincing. - Several relevant details developed. - Critical awareness of language evident. has produced a presentable and very good essay. Adequate - Content: an adequate interpretation of - Ideas: ordinary, lacking depth. - Some points, necessary details developed. - Some awareness of impact of language. has produced a satisfactorily presented essay. Moderate - Content: ordinary. Gaps in coherence. - Ideas: mostly relevant. Repetitive. - Some necessary points evident. - Limited critical language awareness. that has produced a moderately presentable and coherent essay. Elementary - Content not always clear, lacks coherence. - Ideas: few ideas, often repetitive, - Sometimes off General line of thought difficult to follow. - Inadequate evidence of planning/drafting. Essay not well presented. Code 7 80-100% Code 6 70-79% Code 5 60-69% Code 4 50-59% Code 3 40-49% Code 2 30-39% 40-50 38 42 35 39 38 42 35 39 33 37 30 34 35 39 33 37 30 34 28 32 25-29 30 34 28 32 25 29 23 27 20 24 25 29 23 27 20 24 18 22 15 19 20 24 18 22 15 19 03 17

Not Achieved - Content irrelevant. No coherence. - Ideas: repetitive, off - Non-existent planning/drafting. Poorly presented essay. Code 1 00-29% 15 19 03 17 00 14

ENGLISH FIRST ADDITIONAL RUBRIC NSC SECTION B: LONGER TRANSACTIONAL TEXTS 30 MARKS Outstanding Meritorious Substantial Adequate Moderate Elementary Not achieved - Has applied all the - Has applied the - Has applied most of the - Has applied an adequate - Has a moderate idea of - Has vaguely applied - Has not applied the necessary rules of necessary rules of necessary rules of idea of the requirements the requirements of the necessary rules of necessary rules of - Text is well constructed of format - some critical Text is poorly Text is poorly - Text is grammatically - Text is well constructed and easy to read. - Text is adequately oversights. constructed and difficult constructed and accurate and well and accurate. - Vocabulary is appropriate constructed. Errors do not - Text is basically to follow. muddled. constructed. - Vocabulary is mostly to purpose, audience and impede flow. constructed. Several - Vocabulary requires -Vocabulary requires - Vocabulary is very appropriate to purpose, context. - Vocabulary is adequate errors. remediation and not serious remediation appropriate to purpose, audience and context. - Style, tone and register for the purpose, audience - Vocabulary is limited suitable for purpose, and not suitable for audience and context. - Style, tone and register generally appropriate. and context. and not very suitable for audience and context. purpose,. - Style, tone, register very mostly appropriate. - Text mostly error-free - Style, tone and register the purpose, audience - Style, tone and - Style, register and appropriate. - Text largely error-free following proof-reading, adequately appropriate. and context. register inappropriate. tone do not - Text virtually error-free following proof-reading, - Text still contains few - Lapses in style, tone - Text error-ridden correspond with following proof-reading, - Length correct errors following proofreading, and register. despite - Text error-ridden and - Length correct. - Text contains several proof-reading, confused following - Length correct. - Length correct errors following proofreading, - Length too long / proof- reading, short - Length too long / - Length far too long short / short CONTENT Code 7: 80 100% Code 6: 70 79% Code 5: 60 69% Code 4: 50 59% Code 3:40 49% Code 2: 30 39% Code 1: 00 29% Outstanding - Specialized knowledge of requirements of - Disciplined writing - learner maintains thorough focus, no - Text fully coherent in content and ideas, and all details support the has produced a virtually flawless, Meritorious - Good knowledge of requirements of - Disciplined writing learner maintains focus, hardly any ideas, with all details supporting has produced a well crafted, Substantial - Fair knowledge of requirements of - Writing learner maintains focus with minor ideas, and details support has produced a presentable and good text. Code 7: 80-100% Code 6: 70-79% Code 5: 60-69% 24-30 23-25 21 23 23-25 21 23 20-22 18 20 21-23 20-22 18-20 17 19 15 17

Adequate - Adequate knowledge of requirements of - Writing learner digresses from topic but does not impede overall meaning. - Text adequately coherent in content and ideas and some details support has produced a satisfactorily presented text. Moderate - Moderate knowledge of requirements of Response to writing task reveals a narrow focus. meaning is vague in places. - Text moderately coherent in content and ideas and has basic details which support that has produced a moderately presentable and coherent text. Elementary -Elementary knowledge of requirements of Response to writing task reveals a limited focus. - Text not always coherent in content and ideas and has few details which support - Planning/drafting inadequate. Text not well presented. Not achieved - No knowledge of requirements of - Text not coherent in content and ideas and too few details to support - Planning and drafting non-existent. Poorly presented text. Code 4: 50-59% Code 3: 40-49% Code 2: 30-39% Code 1: 00-29% 18-20 17-19 15 17 14 16 12 14 15-17 14 16 12-14 11 13 09 11 12-14 11-1 3 09 11 02 10 09-11 02 10 00 08

ENGLISH FIRST ADDITIONAL RUBRIC NSC SECTION C: SHORTER TRANSACTIONAL TEXTS 10 MARKS SECTION D: REFERENCE / INFORMATIONAL / VISUAL AND MULTI-MEDIA-TEXTS 10 MARKS Outstanding Meritorious Substantial Adequate Moderate Elementary Not achieved - Has applied all the - Has applied the - Has applied most of the - Has applied an - Has a moderate idea of - Has vaguely applied - Has not applied the necessary rules of necessary rules of necessary rules of adequate idea of the the requirements of the necessary rules of necessary rules of requirements of format - some critical Text is poorly Text is poorly - Text is grammatically - Text is well constructed - Text is well constructed - Text is adequately oversights. constructed and difficult constructed and accurate and well and accurate. and easy to read. constructed. Errors do - Text is basically to follow. muddled. constructed. - Vocabulary is mostly - Vocabulary is not impede flow. constructed. Several - Vocabulary requires -Vocabulary requires - Vocabulary is very appropriate to purpose, appropriate to purpose, - Vocabulary is errors. remediation and not serious remediation and appropriate to purpose, audience and context. audience and context. adequate for the - Vocabulary is limited suitable for purpose, not suitable for purpose,. audience and context. - Style, tone and register - Style, tone and register purpose, audience and and not very suitable for audience and context. - Style, register and tone - Style, tone, register very mostly appropriate. generally appropriate. context. the purpose, audience - Style, tone and register do not correspond with appropriate. - Text largely error-free - Text mostly error-free - Style, tone and register and context. inappropriate. - Text virtually error-free following proof-reading, following proof-reading, adequately appropriate. - Lapses in style, tone - Text error-ridden - Text error-ridden and following proof-reading, - Text still contains few and register. despite confused following - Length correct. - Length correct errors following proofreading, - Text contains several proof-reading, proof- reading, - Length correct. errors following proof- - Length too long / - Length far too long / - Length correct reading, short short - Length too long / short CONTENT Code 7: 80 100% Code 6: 70 79% Code 5: 60 69% Code 4: 50 59% Code 3:40 49% Code 2: 30 39% Code 1: 00 29% Outstanding - Specialized knowledge of requirements of - Disciplined writing - learner maintains thorough focus, no - Text fully coherent in content and ideas, and all details support the has produced a virtually flawless, Meritorious - Good knowledge of requirements of - Disciplined writing learner maintains focus, hardly any ideas, with all details supporting has produced a well crafted, Substantial - Fair knowledge of requirements of - Writing learner maintains focus with minor ideas, and details support has produced a presentable and good text. Code 7: 80-100% Code 6: 70-79% Code 5: 60-69% 08-10 08 07 08 08 07-08 07 06-07 07-08 07 06-07 06 05 06

Adequate - Adequate knowledge of requirements of - Writing learner digresses from topic but does not impede overall meaning. - Text adequately coherent in content and ideas and some details support has produced a satisfactorily presented text. Moderate - Moderate knowledge of requirements of Response to writing task reveals a narrow focus. meaning is vague in places. - Text moderately coherent in content and ideas and has basic details which support that has produced a moderately presentable and coherent text. Elementary -Elementary knowledge of requirements of Response to writing task reveals a limited focus. - Text not always coherent in content and ideas and has few details which support - Planning/drafting inadequate. Text not well presented. Not achieved - No knowledge of requirements of - Text not coherent in content and ideas and too few details to support - Planning and drafting non-existent. Poorly presented text. Code 4: 50-59% Code 3: 40-49% Code 2: 30-39% Code 1: 00-29% 06-07 06 05-06 05 04-05 05-06 05 04-05 04 03-04 04-05 04 03-04 01-03 03-04 01-03 00-01