Plagiarism and Academic Integrity

Similar documents
How we look into complaints What happens when we investigate

International Baccalaureate Diploma Programme

Scientific Method Investigation of Plant Seed Germination

ACADEMIC EXCELLENCE REDEFINED American University of Ras Al Khaimah. Syllabus for IBFN 302 Room No: Course Class Timings:

Philosophy in Literature: Italo Calvino (Phil. 331) Fall 2014, M and W 12:00-13:50 p.m.; 103 PETR. Professor Alejandro A. Vallega.

BUS 4040, Communication Skills for Leaders Course Syllabus. Course Description. Course Textbook. Course Learning Outcomes. Credits. Academic Integrity

ACADEMIC POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

TU-E2090 Research Assignment in Operations Management and Services

HISTORY COURSE WORK GUIDE 1. LECTURES, TUTORIALS AND ASSESSMENT 2. GRADES/MARKS SCHEDULE

Academic Success at Ohio State. Caroline Omolesky Program Officer for Sponsored Programs and Academic Liaison Office of International Affairs

Ruggiero, V. R. (2015). The art of thinking: A guide to critical and creative thought (11th ed.). New York, NY: Longman.

Unit 7 Data analysis and design

Student Handbook 2016 University of Health Sciences, Lahore

Academic Integrity RN to BSN Option Student Tutorial

STUDENT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION AND PROMOTION

British International School Istanbul Academic Honesty Policy

THE UNIVERSITY OF WINNIPEG

Dowling, P. J., Festing, M., & Engle, A. (2013). International human resource management (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Cengage Learning.

Rhetoric and the Social Construction of Monsters ACWR Academic Writing Fall Semester 2013

IBCP Language Portfolio Core Requirement for the International Baccalaureate Career-Related Programme

MBA 5652, Research Methods Course Syllabus. Course Description. Course Material(s) Course Learning Outcomes. Credits.

Lower and Upper Secondary

MBA6941, Managing Project Teams Course Syllabus. Course Description. Prerequisites. Course Textbook. Course Learning Objectives.

TROY UNIVERSITY MASTER OF SCIENCE IN INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS DEGREE PROGRAM

Indigenous Thought in Latin American Philosophy (Phil 607) Graduate Seminar Fall 2016, Prof. Alejandro A. Vallega SC 250C, M-W 16:00-17:50

Anglia Ruskin University Assessment Offences

Welcome to the Purdue OWL. Where do I begin? General Strategies. Personalizing Proofreading

University of Victoria School of Exercise Science, Physical and Health Education EPHE 245 MOTOR LEARNING. Calendar Description Units: 1.

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd. Hertfordshire International College

How to organise Quality Events

BHA 4053, Financial Management in Health Care Organizations Course Syllabus. Course Description. Course Textbook. Course Learning Outcomes.

SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY. This course meets the following university learning outcomes: 1. Demonstrate an integrative knowledge of human and natural worlds

TRAITS OF GOOD WRITING

Office Hours: Day Time Location TR 12:00pm - 2:00pm Main Campus Carl DeSantis Building 5136

COURSE HANDBOOK 2016/17. Certificate of Higher Education in PSYCHOLOGY

COURSE DESCRIPTION PREREQUISITE COURSE PURPOSE

The Political Engagement Activity Student Guide

International Organizations and Global Governance: A Crisis in Global Leadership?

Be aware there will be a makeup date for missed class time on the Thanksgiving holiday. This will be discussed in class. Course Description

Class Meeting Time and Place: Section 3: MTWF10:00-10:50 TILT 221

Course Content Concepts

Purpose of internal assessment. Guidance and authenticity. Internal assessment. Assessment

Coding II: Server side web development, databases and analytics ACAD 276 (4 Units)

Institutional review. University of Wales, Newport. November 2010

Course Syllabus Solid Waste Management and Environmental Health ENVH 445 Fall Quarter 2016 (3 Credits)

RESPONSE TO LITERATURE

MANAGERIAL LEADERSHIP

Intensive English Program Southwest College

ASTRONOMY 2801A: Stars, Galaxies & Cosmology : Fall term

UNIVERSITY OF DAR-ES-SALAAM OFFICE OF VICE CHANCELLOR-ACADEMIC DIRECTORATE OF POSTGRADUATE STUDIUES

Politics and Society Curriculum Specification

NCFE - Level 3 Award in Education and Training

Writing the Personal Statement

THE UNIVERSITY OF WINNIPEG

Master of Statistics - Master Thesis

MENTORING. Tips, Techniques, and Best Practices

INFO I303 Organizational Informatics

Senior Stenographer / Senior Typist Series (including equivalent Secretary titles)

2. YOU AND YOUR ASSESSMENT PROCESS

Reading Project. Happy reading and have an excellent summer!

Khairul Hisyam Kamarudin, PhD 22 Feb 2017 / UTM Kuala Lumpur

Texas A&M University - Central Texas PSYK PRINCIPLES OF RESEARCH FOR THE BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES. Professor: Elizabeth K.

An unexamined life is not worth living -Socrates

GENERAL COMMENTS Some students performed well on the 2013 Tamil written examination. However, there were some who did not perform well.

STUDENT MISCONDUCT PROCEDURE

Navitas UK Holdings Ltd Embedded College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education

Chemistry 106 Chemistry for Health Professions Online Fall 2015

BSM 2801, Sport Marketing Course Syllabus. Course Description. Course Textbook. Course Learning Outcomes. Credits.

Course Syllabus p. 1. Introduction to Web Design AVT 217 Spring 2017 TTh 10:30-1:10, 1:30-4:10 Instructor: Shanshan Cui

MURRAY STATE UNIVERSITY DEPARTMENT: NUTRITION, DIETETICS, AND FOOD MANAGEMENT COURSE PREFIX: NTN COURSE NUMBER: 230 CREDIT HOURS: 3

St. Martin s Marking and Feedback Policy

CS 100: Principles of Computing

Assessment Pack HABC Level 3 Award in Education and Training (QCF)

a) analyse sentences, so you know what s going on and how to use that information to help you find the answer.

ELP in whole-school use. Case study Norway. Anita Nyberg

Handbook for Teachers

Master Program: Strategic Management. Master s Thesis a roadmap to success. Innsbruck University School of Management

Shank, Matthew D. (2009). Sports marketing: A strategic perspective (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson/Prentice Hall.

CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, SAN MARCOS SCHOOL OF EDUCATION

PHO 1110 Basic Photography for Photographers. Instructor Information: Materials:

ECON 484-A1 GAME THEORY AND ECONOMIC APPLICATIONS

SPM 5309: SPORT MARKETING Fall 2017 (SEC. 8695; 3 credits)

Business. Pearson BTEC Level 1 Introductory in. Specification

PERFORMING ARTS. Unit 2 Proposal for a commissioning brief Suite. Cambridge TECHNICALS LEVEL 3. L/507/6467 Guided learning hours: 60

Personal Tutoring at Staffordshire University

I275 Introduction to Human-Computer Interaction Theory

CHMB16H3 TECHNIQUES IN ANALYTICAL CHEMISTRY

PSCH 312: Social Psychology

Syllabus Fall 2014 Earth Science 130: Introduction to Oceanography

HIST 3300 HISTORIOGRAPHY & METHODS Kristine Wirts

BOS 3001, Fundamentals of Occupational Safety and Health Course Syllabus. Course Description. Course Textbook. Course Learning Outcomes.

Grade 4. Common Core Adoption Process. (Unpacked Standards)

Personal Tutor Manual

LITERACY ACROSS THE CURRICULUM POLICY

EDF 6211: Educational Psychology: Applied Foundations Classroom GC (Graham Center 287-B)

Trip to the beach essay >>>CLICK HERE<<<

flash flash player free players download.

Presentation Advice for your Professional Review

ASHMOLE ACADEMY. Admissions Appeals Booklet

TOPIC VN7 PAINTING AND DECORATING

Transcription:

Plagiarism and Academic Integrity A guide for new students Author: Associate Professor David Swain then Chairperson, Student Discipline Committee First published: 2004 Editor: Claire Guthrie, then Student Discipline Administrator Current version: 2013

Welcome Welcome to the University of Waikato. You have made an important decision to study here and we want your time here to be successful, so here is some important information and advice that will help you. Please study and remember the information and advice in this document. Studying at University When you study at university you will be in an environment where the creation of knowledge is valued for itself and where you will be stimulated to become a critical thinker, and a productive and ethical citizen (University of Waikato Charter). You, and perhaps your families, are making a major investment in your study here because you want to achieve a university qualification of which you can be proud and which others will respect and that when you graduate you can be proud of your achievements and the University can be assured that it is all your own work. The gaining of this qualification also includes learning things other than the subject matter of the discipline in which you will major. You will learn primarily to be an independent thinker, someone who is able think about important questions and who tries to answer them; someone who is not afraid to ask these questions and to search for the answers. You will learn an extensive range of skills and tools to enable you to be an accomplished learner, thinker and researcher. All these factors require academic integrity, high standards of honesty and personal conduct underpinned by respect and trust between all members of the university community. Academic Integrity Academic integrity requires that all assessment items are your own work or are properly sourced. Therefore we have strict rules about plagiarism, the acknowledgement and referencing of the sources of the content of your assignments (sources such as books, articles, lectures, readings and the internet), and your use of other students' work. The information in this document should enable you to understand what the University expects and thus will enable you to do your work properly and hopefully achieve the well-respected qualification you seek. So here is what you need to know. Plagiarism It may be that your previous teachers and educational institutions did not expect you to reference all the material from other sources in your assignments. We do! If you fail to reference everything by other people and organisations in your assignments you may well find yourself facing a formal discipline process for plagiarism, which the University regards as a serious type of misconduct. It is irrelevant whether you intended to misrepresent the work of others as your own; if you do not reference everything by other people and organisations it is plagiarism 1 and that is misconduct! 1 Section 8.2 of the University's Assessment Regulations states that plagiarism is prohibited. Section 3 defines plagiarism as: presenting as one's own work the work of another, and includes the copying or paraphrasing of another person's work in an assessment item without acknowledging it as the other person's work through full and accurate referencing... [and this] applies to assessment presented through a written, spoken, electronic, broadcasting, visual, performance or other medium (University of Waikato Calendar)

Plagiarism is using somebody else s ideas, research or written work without indicating where it comes from. To use someone else s work as though it were your own is cheating. All Your Own Work To complete your qualification and graduate you must pass a set of courses. Your assignments, tests and examination scripts are assessed to determine the quality and grade of your work. The assignments you submit must be 100% your own work: they must represent your understanding of the subject, and your understanding of the work of others. A vital element of showing that you understand the work of others is your acknowledgement of their work. You do this through proper in-text citations and use of a reference list. Sometimes you will quote the work of others directly, using quotation marks (.. ) around the quotation and giving the exact location of the words you have quoted. Sometimes you will paraphrase the work of others. Paraphrasing means summarising the work of others in your own words, emphasising what is especially relevant to your assignment, developing their work for your assignment. When you paraphrase, you must still acknowledge the source by proper referencing of the relevant work with an intext citation of the author s name and date of publication. Sometimes you may work with other students in a group, discussing the topic and the material recommended by your teacher. It is acceptable to help each other understand the topic and the material you have to study as collaborating and supporting each other is a good way to learn. But it is not acceptable to copy each other's assignments or to use other students ideas without thinking about the topic yourself. This is collusion. What you hand in must be 100% your own perspective, even though you have studied together and helped each other understand what you are studying. If you use another student's ideas you must acknowledge his or her contribution with a proper reference. It is not acceptable to borrow or use other students assignments. So, you must acknowledge (by proper referencing) the direct quotation (even if it is only a few words); the paraphrasing of the words of others; and the use of printed or electronic material to give you ideas, facts, understanding or inspiration. If your course includes group work, or you have formed an informal study group, you must acknowledge: substantial assistance by others with understanding material; ideas and views developed through group work; material developed by group work; and significant or substantive editing of your written work by others. There are a number of different styles and ways of referencing all these sources. Good academic work requires that you use an appropriate style and way of referencing. Specific guidelines and requirements for referencing will often be stated in Departmental and/or School handbooks and the Library has information leaflets on various styles and ways of setting out references. Further information can also be obtained from Student Learning or the Faculty of Management s student learning group called Language and Learning. There is online and face to face support available and it is free. To understand how to acknowledge sources you need the referencing style guide appropriate to the course for which you are writing the assignment, you can get this from your Department or Faculty.

What to Avoid What happens if you don't follow this advice? When one of your teachers thinks one of your assignments has problems with acknowledgement and referencing, he or she has to decide whether to treat it as a mistake or as misconduct - i.e. plagiarism. If they decide it is a mistake they are likely to explain the mistake to you, so you don't make it again, and they will give the assignment a mark which reflects among other things the poor acknowledgement and referencing. You are expected to learn how to acknowledge correctly by using the appropriate style of referencing, and you will be told all about this in your first classes and in hand-outs you will receive. If they decide that you have had opportunities here at the University of Waikato to learn about acknowledgement and referencing but have failed to do so they are more likely to decide to treat your deficient acknowledgement and referencing as possible misconduct. This means your assignment will be referred to the University's discipline system. How is your teacher likely to make this decision? If your assignment includes some or most of the following, your teacher may decide to treat the problem as a mistake: the acknowledgement and referencing problems are relatively minor; it is early in your academic career at the University of Waikato (it is one of your first few assignments); and there has not yet been much opportunity to practice acknowledgement, referencing and plagiarism in your classes. If few or none of these apply, your teacher may decide to treat the problem as misconduct (plagiarism). If your assignment is referred to the discipline system and it is your first referral for misconduct it is likely that you will be offered a summary jurisdiction hearing with the Chairperson of the Student Discipline Committee, who represents the Vice-Chancellor, the executive head of the University. The letter requesting that you attend this hearing will explain about summary jurisdiction and the alternative you have the right to choose, which is a formal Student Discipline Committee hearing. (If it is not your first referral for misconduct you are likely to be referred directly to the Student Discipline Committee). If the teachers or staff supervising a test or examination think a student has cheated in the test or examination, they will be referred to the same discipline system for a summary jurisdiction or Student Discipline Committee hearing. The University of Waikato and your teachers want you to be successful and to gain your chosen and respected qualification. So, please study the information and advice in this leaflet carefully, making sure that you understand the acknowledgement and referencing which is required in your work here (and at all New Zealand universities), and you should be able to avoid committing plagiarism and facing discipline proceedings, and you will be on the road to success! Exercises Note: Answer these questions using your own words, and indicate the paragraph(s) in the article where the answer can be found. 1. Why does the University have strict rules about plagiarism and acknowledgment of sources? 2. Why is it important to acknowledge other people s ideas? 3. Are students allowed to discuss assignments with each other? Explain.

4. How can you avoid plagiarism? 5. How can you find out the referencing styles for your major? 6. What is the difference between collaboration and collusion? 7. What are the consequences of plagiarism? 8. Why is it important to understand what plagiarism is? Vocabulary 9. What is the difference between - Quotation and plagiarism? - Mistake and misconduct? 10. There are several words in bold in the article. Using your own words, explain the meaning of these words. Need more information? Go to the Student Discipline webpage http://www.waikato.ac.nz/sasd/misconduct/ For further information, please contact our Academic Integrity Adviser, Rachel Fulton: Email: academic.integrity@waikato.ac.nz Or contact our Student Learning Email: slsadmin@waikato.ac.nz Location: W.G.50