Research capacity in the Western Balkans Survey Questionnaire 3 (Q3) addressing individual researchers

Similar documents
Participant Report Form Call 2015 KA1 Mobility of Staff in higher education - Staff mobility for teaching and training activities

SME Academia cooperation in research projects in Research for the Benefit of SMEs within FP7 Capacities programme

EUROPEAN UNIVERSITIES LOOKING FORWARD WITH CONFIDENCE PRAGUE DECLARATION 2009

UNIVERSITY OF DERBY JOB DESCRIPTION. Centre for Excellence in Learning and Teaching. JOB NUMBER SALARY to per annum

EUA Annual Conference Bergen. University Autonomy in Europe NOVA University within the context of Portugal

INSTRUCTION MANUAL. Survey of Formal Education

FACULTY OF PSYCHOLOGY

HIGHER EDUCATION IN POLAND

Interview on Quality Education

Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions in H2020

International Social Science Research in Africa, Asia, and Latin America: A Multidisciplinary Seminar on Concept, Design, and Praxis

Quality in University Lifelong Learning (ULLL) and the Bologna process

The EUA and Open Access

LIVERPOOL JOHN MOORES UNIVERSITY Department of Electrical Engineering Job Description

Department of Plant and Soil Sciences

Guidelines for drafting the participant observation report

Note: Principal version Modification Amendment Modification Amendment Modification Complete version from 1 October 2014

Improving the impact of development projects in Sub-Saharan Africa through increased UK/Brazil cooperation and partnerships Held in Brasilia

AAC/BOT Page 1 of 9

OFFICE OF HUMAN RESOURCES SAMPLE WEB CONFERENCE OR ON-CAMPUS INTERVIEW QUESTIONS

Director, Intelligent Mobility Design Centre

Colorado State University Department of Construction Management. Assessment Results and Action Plans

LOOKING FOR (RE)DEFINING UNIVERSITY AUTONOMY

Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures

The following information has been adapted from A guide to using AntConc.

Senior Research Fellow, Intelligent Mobility Design Centre

Tenure Track policy. A career path for promising young academics. University Medical Center Groningen (UMCG)

RCPCH MMC Cohort Study (Part 4) March 2016

TABLE OF CONTENTS. By-Law 1: The Faculty Council...3

Swinburne University of Technology 2020 Plan

Workload Policy Department of Art and Art History Revised 5/2/2007

SGS ROADMAP

Intellectual Property

Curricular Reviews: Harvard, Yale & Princeton. DUE Meeting

University of Texas Libraries. Welcome!

1. Amend Article Departmental co-ordination and program committee as set out in Appendix A.

This survey is intended for Pitt Public Health graduates from December 2013, April 2014, June 2014, and August EOH: MPH. EOH: PhD.

Lecturer Promotion Process (November 8, 2016)

Council of the European Union Brussels, 4 November 2015 (OR. en)

Educational Leadership and Administration

How to Judge the Quality of an Objective Classroom Test

Tribal Colleges and Universities

Table of Contents. Internship Requirements 3 4. Internship Checklist 5. Description of Proposed Internship Request Form 6. Student Agreement Form 7

University of Toronto

The University of North Carolina Strategic Plan Online Survey and Public Forums Executive Summary

Application for Fellowship Theme Year Sephardic Identities, Medieval and Early Modern. Instructions and Checklist

PROVIDENCE UNIVERSITY COLLEGE

HARPER ADAMS UNIVERSITY Programme Specification

EOSC Governance Development Forum 4 May 2017 Per Öster

Tailoring i EW-MFA (Economy-Wide Material Flow Accounting/Analysis) information and indicators

Marie Skłodowska-Curie Actions (MSCA)

Abstract. Janaka Jayalath Director / Information Systems, Tertiary and Vocational Education Commission, Sri Lanka.

Referencing the Danish Qualifications Framework for Lifelong Learning to the European Qualifications Framework

Introduction to Moodle

A European inventory on validation of non-formal and informal learning

The Isett Seta Career Guide 2010

USE OF ONLINE PUBLIC ACCESS CATALOGUE IN GURU NANAK DEV UNIVERSITY LIBRARY, AMRITSAR: A STUDY

Analyzing the Usage of IT in SMEs

Research training and national innovation systems in Australia, Finland and the United States

Bachelor of Engineering in Biotechnology

Knowledge for the Future Developments in Higher Education and Research in the Netherlands

EUA Quality Culture: Implementing Bologna Reforms

SASKATCHEWAN MINISTRY OF ADVANCED EDUCATION

INCOMING [PEGASUS]² MARIE SKŁODOWSKA-CURIE FELLOWSHIPS 1

Engineers and Engineering Brand Monitor 2015

Report survey post-doctoral researchers at NTNU

SCOPUS An eye on global research. Ayesha Abed Library

Post-Master s Certificate in. Leadership for Higher Education

Universität Innsbruck Facts and Figures

James H. Williams, Ed.D. CICE, Hiroshima University George Washington University August 2, 2012

3. Examinations and final assessment of the degree programmes

Program Change Proposal:

Information session FWO: Call Fellowships. Dr. Hans Willems Director research policy. December 2013

APPENDIX A-13 PERIODIC MULTI-YEAR REVIEW OF FACULTY & LIBRARIANS (PMYR) UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL

State of play of EQF implementation in Montenegro Zora Bogicevic, Ministry of Education Rajko Kosovic, VET Center

Research Update. Educational Migration and Non-return in Northern Ireland May 2008

Promotion and Tenure Policy

Assumption University Five-Year Strategic Plan ( )

HDR Presentation of Thesis Procedures pro-030 Version: 2.01

Guidelines for Mobilitas Pluss postdoctoral grant applications

The European Higher Education Area in 2012:

MODERNISATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAMMES IN THE FRAMEWORK OF BOLOGNA: ECTS AND THE TUNING APPROACH

Australia s tertiary education sector

InTraServ. Dissemination Plan INFORMATION SOCIETY TECHNOLOGIES (IST) PROGRAMME. Intelligent Training Service for Management Training in SMEs

COLLEGE OF BUSINESS AND ECONOMICS DEPARTMENT OF MARKETING CLINICAL FACULTY POLICY AND PROCEDURES

MSE 5301, Interagency Disaster Management Course Syllabus. Course Description. Prerequisites. Course Textbook. Course Learning Objectives

USER ADAPTATION IN E-LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS

Introduction to Information System

Preprint.

TEXAS CHRISTIAN UNIVERSITY M. J. NEELEY SCHOOL OF BUSINESS CRITERIA FOR PROMOTION & TENURE AND FACULTY EVALUATION GUIDELINES 9/16/85*

PhD Competences in Food Studies

5.7 Country case study: Vietnam

Standard 5: The Faculty. Martha Ross James Madison University Patty Garvin

Self-Study Report. Markus Geissler, PhD

e-portfolios in Australian education and training 2008 National Symposium Report

GALICIAN TEACHERS PERCEPTIONS ON THE USABILITY AND USEFULNESS OF THE ODS PORTAL

Wildlife, Fisheries, & Conservation Biology

Success Factors for Creativity Workshops in RE

Report on Deliverable 5.1: Kick off Meeting & Prevention plan on obstacles

Computer Science PhD Program Evaluation Proposal Based on Domain and Non-Domain Characteristics

Transcription:

Research capacity in the Western Balkans Survey Questionnaire 3 (Q3) addressing individual researchers The objective of this survey, which is funded by the European Commission (EC), is to gather information and opinions from higher education and research institutions in the Western Balkans in order to better support research capacity in the region. Please click here to view the letter of support by the EC. The study is carried out under the SPHERE Initiative, by a consortium comprised of the European University Association (EUA) and the University of Barcelona. The study is composed as three surveys, each targeting a different institutional stakeholder. The surveys will take 5-15 minutes to complete. The first questionnaire (Q1) addresses leadership of universities / colleges / research institutions. The second questionnaire (Q2) is addressed to the management of the individual research entities at your institution, such as faculties, departments, or institutes. The current questionnaire (Q3) targets individual researchers working at your institution (different disciplines, different levels of seniority). Some terms throughout the questionnaire may need further explanation. The online version provides links to access additional explanation where required. Those terms are explained in the glossary of terms at the end of the document.

Q3 - Questionnaire Researchers Personal INFORMATION Add introductory page (see other questionnaires) 1. Are you? Please select Male Female 2. Academic degrees (if you have several, just the once that are most important for your researcher career) Degree Year of award Country of award Undergraduate degree (or equivalent) Master degree (or equivalent) Doctorate [Drop down list year] [Drop down list - country] 3. Country in which your institution is located. If your institution is not in the drop down list, please select other and specify the name below. Drop-down list

including other 4. What is the name of your current employing institution/organisation (in case of several employers, please indicate the main one)? [Drop down list universities] If not in the list, please select Other and specify here: 5. Type of institution? - Public university - Private university - Public college - Private college - Research institute - Other 6. What is your position? Please select Professor Associate Professor Lecturer Senior Research Fellow Postdoc/Research Fellow Research Assistant Teaching Assistant Dean, head of department or other senior administration position Other: 7. Which describes best your current employment situation (please, select all the appropriate responses) Permanent (tenure) contract Fixed term contract (display options): o <1year o 1-2 year o 2+ year Post-doctoral position (display options): o <2 year o 2-3 year o 3+ year Non-employment contract (e.g. fellowship/grant without social benefits) Other, please specify 8. Is your contract? Please select Full time Part time (display options): <50% >50% 9. Does your salary come from The institution s own funding Government National or international fellowship Other 10. Do you also work in any other place? No Yes, less than 8 h a month

Yes, less than 20 h a month Yes, less than 30 h a month Yes, 30h or more Yes, but irregularly other If yes, in what sector Teaching Public research institution Contract with a foreign research institution Public sector/ government Business sector/ private enterprise Contract with a foreign company Self-employed Other 11. Are you teaching? Yes/no 12. If you are teaching: What is your weekly teaching work load at your main institution and, if applicable, at other institutions? 6 hours or less At your institution At other institutions 8 hours or less 10 hours or less more than 10 hours None/ not applicable 13. On average, how much time per week do you allocate to research? None/ not applicable Less than 8h Less than 20h More than 20h Full-time 14. What is your main field of research? Sciences Mathematics, statistics & computing Engineering, manufacturing & construction Medical and Health Sciences & Services Agricultural Sciences (incl. Veterinary) Social Sciences Law Business/Economics Humanities and Arts Education Services 15. How do you usually conduct your research activities? Very commonly Sometimes Seldom Never Not applicable

Alone Within a research group/team colleagues from my institution colleagues from other institutions in my country colleagues from other institutions in the Western Balkans international colleagues domestic industry international industry Other: 16. How many PhD candidates are you currently supervising? None 4 or less 10 or less 20 or less More than 20 17. How much freedom do you have in your research: Yes, full Yes, to autonomy some extent to choose your own line of research? to manage research funds? to select and hire staff? to carry out commercial activities? to engage in interdisciplinary research? No, or very limited autonomy I do not know/ not applicable 18. Which of the following describes your situation? I have access to the necessary research infrastructure (labs, agree Agree to some extent Disagree to some extent disagree I do not know, not applicable

computers, library etc.) to do my research I have the necessary staff support to do my research I have the necessary funding to do my research In my position, I have a high level of autonomy in developing my research I am involved in interdisciplinary research collaboration within my institution I am involved in interdisciplinary research collaboration within colleagues from other institutions I am involved in spin-off activities, research incubators or similar I am/have been involved in patents I frequently attend international conferences I am very dedicated to my work I am satisfied with my career I am satisfied with my salary I am proud to work at my institution/organisation My working situation is difficult, due to a high workload My working situation is difficult, due to bureaucracy, administration 19. Do you have access to the following? If yes, how would you rate the quality? Research support services / unit Research laboratories Teaching labs (if different from the research Labs) Large research equipment that requires technicians Scientific databases (e.g. ISI Web of Knowledge) Knowledge Transfer Office Incubators No access International standard, or close to it Good national standard Insufficient Not applicable/ do not know

Research ethics committee Libraries Research publication repositories Computer equipment IT Services Accommodation for visiting scholars Buildings/premi ses in general Power supply/ electricity communication infrastructure (phone, internet etc.) 20. Have you published any of the following over the last year (2016)? Yes mostly with single authorship Yes mostly coauthored No ISI journal articles Other journal articles (non-isi) Papers presented at international conferences Papers presented at national conferences PhD. Thesis Books Book chapters Reports 20.1 If co-authored, who do you write with more often? ISI journal articles Colleagues from my institution Colleagues from other institutions International Colleagues Other journal articles (non-isi) Papers presented at international conferences Papers presented at national conferences PhD. Thesis Books

Book chapters Reports 21. Have you been involved in applications for research projects (regardless whether successful or not)? Frequently, as an applicant Frequently, as a partner Occasionally as an applicant Occasionally as a partner No National, involving colleagues from another institution Horizon 2020 / FP7 Other European project Other international project 22. Were you involved in any research activity related with local development or any other kind of societal impact over the last year? Yes No If yes, please specify 23. What are the main problems that you and fellow researchers face at your faculty/ department / institute? agree Agree Disagree There is no or insufficient research funding There are no or insufficient research facilities Some research facilities can only be accessed by some researchers There is no or insufficient administrative support (e.g. to help prepare research proposals, manage research projects etc.) Most researchers have no international research contacts Most researchers are not internationally mobile It is not possible to hire international researchers Most researchers have a high teaching workload and cannot put enough focus on their research Neither agree or disagree disagree

Most researchers have other jobs on the side and cannot put enough focus on their research Other: 24. What do you see as the main problems for research in your country? Research is not given sufficiently high priority by the state There is no national strategy, which would provide a clear framework There is no or insufficient research funding There are no or insufficient research facilities Research is too much concentrated in a few institutions Higher education institutions are focusing too much on teaching, and neglect research Research is not sufficiently applied, and ignores the needs of the industry and society There is too much focus on applied research Interdisciplinary research is not sufficiently encouraged The best researchers are leaving the country, which is a problem The best researchers are leaving the country, but they still continue to contribute to national research Young researchers are leaving the country Young talented people look for careers outside of the research and higher education sectors Other: agree Agree Neither agree or disagree Disagree disagree

25. Please name and describe one highlight regarding the research at your institution that you would like to draw attention to? This does not necessarily have to be something that is internationally recognized, but can be a process, a project, a strategy, service or research output that you think is locally or nationally relevant : 26. In your opinion, what could be done to improve the situation for research, in your country, at the level of your institution, by your government and by the EU? 27. Is there any other important information with regards to research and research capacity that you want to convey? 28. If you would like a copy of the final report of this study, please indicate: Yes No THANK YOU FOR YOUR TIME IN COMPLETING THIS QUESTIONNAIRE You have completed this survey. Your participation is highly valuable for this study. If you have any concerns about this survey, please contact us via hepu-surveys@eua.be.

Glossary of Terms: Q19. Research support services Services that support researchers and their research projects, for example in drafting proposals, preparation of applications, search for funding opportunities, general management. Knowledge Transfer Office An office facilitating the transfer of research results and outputs into economy and society Incubators A structure which supports the development of new businesses through staff, infrastructure and funding