College Procedure. 1. Introduction

Similar documents
ANNUAL CURRICULUM REVIEW PROCESS for the 2016/2017 Academic Year

Loyalist College Applied Degree Proposal. Name of Institution: Loyalist College of Applied Arts and Technology

The Characteristics of Programs of Information

DISTRICT ASSESSMENT, EVALUATION & REPORTING GUIDELINES AND PROCEDURES

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd. Hertfordshire International College

GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION

Programme Specification. MSc in International Real Estate

Academic Program Assessment Prior to Implementation (Policy and Procedures)

Position Statements. Index of Association Position Statements

Programme Specification. BSc (Hons) RURAL LAND MANAGEMENT

Qs&As Providing Financial Aid to Former Everest College Students March 11, 2015

Post-Master s Certificate in. Leadership for Higher Education

September 6-8. San Francisco, California 1

PERFORMING ARTS. Unit 2 Proposal for a commissioning brief Suite. Cambridge TECHNICALS LEVEL 3. L/507/6467 Guided learning hours: 60

Qualification handbook

OECD THEMATIC REVIEW OF TERTIARY EDUCATION GUIDELINES FOR COUNTRY PARTICIPATION IN THE REVIEW

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Mandatory Review of Social Skills Qualifications. Consultation document for Approval to List

Unit 7 Data analysis and design

Qualification Guidance

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

State of play of EQF implementation in Montenegro Zora Bogicevic, Ministry of Education Rajko Kosovic, VET Center

Specification. BTEC Specialist qualifications. Edexcel BTEC Level 1 Award/Certificate/Extended Certificate in Construction Skills (QCF)

Chapter 2. University Committee Structure

Educational Support Program Standard

2013/Q&PQ THE SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY

ONTARIO FOOD COLLABORATIVE

1. Amend Article Departmental co-ordination and program committee as set out in Appendix A.

Navitas UK Holdings Ltd Embedded College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education

CÉGEP HERITAGE COLLEGE POLICY #8

MSc Education and Training for Development

Accessibility For Ontarians With Disabilities Act 2005 (AODA) Multi-year Accessibility Plan. Prepared by: Carleton University AODA Task Force

Course Specification Executive MBA via e-learning (MBUSP)

Additional Qualification Course Guideline Computer Studies, Specialist

Accommodation for Students with Disabilities

CONSULTATION ON THE ENGLISH LANGUAGE COMPETENCY STANDARD FOR LICENSED IMMIGRATION ADVISERS

AUTHORITATIVE SOURCES ADULT AND COMMUNITY LEARNING LEARNING PROGRAMMES

Drs Rachel Patrick, Emily Gray, Nikki Moodie School of Education, School of Global, Urban and Social Studies, College of Design and Social Context

Recognition of Prior Learning (RPL) Policy

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES RECOMMENDATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

SACS Reaffirmation of Accreditation: Process and Reports

A European inventory on validation of non-formal and informal learning

What does Quality Look Like?

Diploma of Building and Construction (Building)

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF SCHOOLS (K 12)

Upward Bound Program

CONTINUUM OF SPECIAL EDUCATION SERVICES FOR SCHOOL AGE STUDENTS

Pre-Health Sciences Pathway to Advanced Diplomas and Degrees Program Standard

BSc (Hons) Banking Practice and Management (Full-time programmes of study)

TRAVEL & TOURISM CAREER GUIDE. a world of career opportunities

Initial teacher training in vocational subjects

TEACHING QUALITY: SKILLS. Directive Teaching Quality Standard Applicable to the Provision of Basic Education in Alberta

Innovating Toward a Vibrant Learning Ecosystem:

Services for Children and Young People

SHEEO State Authorization Inventory. Nevada Last Updated: October 2011

Researcher Development Assessment A: Knowledge and intellectual abilities

CORE CURRICULUM FOR REIKI

SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

Focus on. Learning THE ACCREDITATION MANUAL 2013 WASC EDITION

Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011)

Santa Fe Community College Teacher Academy Student Guide 1

An Introduction to LEAP

Educating Georgia s Future gadoe.org. Richard Woods, Georgia s School Superintendent. Richard Woods, Georgia s School Superintendent. gadoe.

University of Toronto Mississauga Degree Level Expectations. Preamble

Indiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning. PBL Certification Process

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)

Nova Scotia School Advisory Council Handbook

Strategic Planning for Retaining Women in Undergraduate Computing

Expanded Learning Time Expectations for Implementation

VOCATIONAL EDUCATION AND TRAINING THROUGH ONE S LIFETIME

Lincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal

HIGHLAND HIGH SCHOOL CREDIT FLEXIBILITY PLAN

Quality in University Lifelong Learning (ULLL) and the Bologna process

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Kaplan International Colleges UK Ltd

Definitions for KRS to Committee for Mathematics Achievement -- Membership, purposes, organization, staffing, and duties

Head of Music Job Description. TLR 2c

SHEEO State Authorization Inventory. Kentucky Last Updated: May 2013

BYLAWS of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan

A Year of Training. A Lifetime of Leadership. Adult Ministries. Master of Arts in Ministry

Exam Centre Contingency and Adverse Effects Policy

College of Business University of South Florida St. Petersburg Governance Document As Amended by the College Faculty on February 10, 2014

Core Strategy #1: Prepare professionals for a technology-based, multicultural, complex world

University of the Arts London (UAL) Diploma in Professional Studies Art and Design Date of production/revision May 2015

Systemic Improvement in the State Education Agency

Setting the Scene: ECVET and ECTS the two transfer (and accumulation) systems for education and training

Self Assessment. InTech Collegiate High School. Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT

Executive Programmes 2013

Student Assessment Policy: Education and Counselling

Assessment and national report of Poland on the existing training provisions of professionals in the Healthcare Waste Management industry REPORT: III

Bachelor of Applied Technology. Architecture Interior Design

The EQF Referencing report of the Kosovo NQF for General Education, VET and Higher Education

Bachelor of Software Engineering: Emerging sustainable partnership with industry in ODL

New Jersey Department of Education World Languages Model Program Application Guidance Document

Albemarle County Public Schools School Improvement Plan KEY CHANGES THIS YEAR

Master of Science (MS) in Education with a specialization in. Leadership in Educational Administration

Spring Valley Academy Credit Flexibility Plan (CFP) Overview

FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY AT DODGE CITY

DESIGNPRINCIPLES RUBRIC 3.0

NC Global-Ready Schools

Transcription:

College Procedure PROCEDURE TYPE: Academic PROCEDURE TITLE: Curriculum Development PROCEDURE NO.: ACAD-102.1 RESPONSIBILITY: Vice-president, Academic APPROVED BY: Durham College Leadership Team EFFECTIVE DATE: February 2016 REVISED: REVIEW DATE: December 2019 1. Introduction Curriculum provides a framework for Durham College s core business - teaching and learning. In conjunction with Durham College Curriculum Development Policy, the Curriculum Development Procedure articulates a coherent curriculum development procedure for use by the program team in developing or revising curriculum. Such a procedure assists in the integration of the various curriculum activities by identifying the elements of curriculum development and defining processes, roles and responsibilities for the development and renewal of post-secondary curriculum at Durham College. 2. Purpose A comprehensive procedure of curriculum development for the college will assist in identifying the processes, required resources, roles and responsibilities, policies and procedures, and in promoting the integration of various curriculum activities 3. Process The curriculum development process recognizes that new curriculum development and curriculum modification is initiated by several key stakeholders. These include the program team, program faculty, academic leadership, community and industry partners through program advisory committees and government bodies 4. Definitions 4.1. Course outline Course outline refers to the documentation of a course s purpose, learning outcomes, essential employability skills as well as its sequence of instruction, resources and evaluation criteria. Page 1 of 6

4.2. Curriculum Curriculum refers to vocational learning outcomes, course learning outcomes, essential employability skills outcomes, general education, content and subject matter, learning activities and experiences, and assessment and evaluation, the purpose of which is to enable the achievement of learning outcomes. Curriculum is developed with the input of government, external advisory bodies, students and faculty. 4.3. Curriculum development Curriculum development includes the creation and revision of course descriptions, pre- and co-requisites, learning outcomes, teaching and learning methods, evaluation strategies, prior learning assessment and recognition (PLAR) processes, sequences of instruction and individual lessons, and the selection of resources appropriate to the delivery of a course. It should integrate program information gathered from activities and documents such as Program Mapping, KPIs, Annual Curriculum Renewal, Program Review and Renewal, Program Health Matrix, Program Quality Performance Reports and Program Advisory recommendations, and should always be developed in the context of the program within which the course resides. Curriculum developed for new programs should include the previous aspects as well as integrate program information gathered from the program proposal documents such as the Ontario Credential Validation Services approval document, PEQAB standards, focus group data, curriculum map, and published program standards or descriptions. Courses being developed for new programs should be developed in accordance with the Durham College New Program Development Policy and Procedure (ACAD-104 and ACAD-104.1). 4.4. Program team Program team includes individuals and faculty with knowledge and expertise in the specific field, the dean, associate dean, and may include a technician/technologist. In the case of new program development, the team could include the dean and/or associate dean, Project Lead, faculty, subject matter experts, curriculum specialists, stakeholders, industry representatives, and community partners. 5. Procedure 5.1. Curriculum development of new programs will be developed with consultation with a curriculum specialist, Centre for Academic and Faculty Enrichment (C.A.F.E.). 5.2. Develop clear, measurable, performance-based learning outcomes, which are aligned to learning and learning activities and assessments. 5.3. Learning/course outcomes and assessment measures of student learning will be developed consistent with the credential granted, provincial program standards Page 2 of 6

(where they exist), the program map and the minimum expectations of the workplace. 5.4. Prior learning assessments are designed to evaluate the course learning outcomes, including the essential employability outcomes for a given course. 5.5. Program curriculum of existing programs will be reviewed annually to ensure it remains current, relevant, and to ensure it is meeting the occupational requirements of program graduates. 5.6. Changes to the program curriculum will be made when necessary, including changes to course outcomes, learning activities, and assessments of student learning. Changes must be approved by the School s Leadership and follow the prescribed timelines. See Program Change Policy ACAD-124 and Procedure ACAD-124.1 for further information. 6. Roles and responsibilities 6.1. Program team 6.1.1. The role of the program team is to meet on a regular basis to ensure continuous development and improvement of the program. The team will consult with CAFE, as required, for advice regarding such matters as: instructional design, assessment/evaluation and the incorporation of learning technologies. 6.1.2. The program team will review appropriate program information, such as: program description, MAESD program standards, PEQAB standards and external accreditation standards when applicable, course outlines/course learning outcomes, assessment/evaluation rubrics and practices. 6.1.3. The program team is responsible for the co-ordination and alignment of the program curriculum by: Ensuring the program learning outcomes are consistent with the Minister s Binding Policy Directive for Programs of Instruction, the Credentials Framework, aligned with provincial program standards, PEQAB standards, program descriptions and/or external licensing, regulatory and accreditation standards; Ensuring learning outcomes are appropriate to the level for the credential; Ensuring the program learning outcomes are reflected in the course learning outcomes and appropriate to the requirements of the program graduates; Ensuring clear statements of learning outcomes exist for the courses and are communicated effectively to students; Page 3 of 6

Analyzing curriculum for gaps and redundancies in outcomes, teaching and learning, and assessments; Providing guidelines regarding the level of learning required in a course as it relates to class time, semester of study, and course outcomes; Tracking and documenting the development and implementation of curriculum changes; Participating in program mapping and analysis, Annual Curriculum Renewal (ACR), Program Review and Renewal and the development of annual Program Quality Progress Reports (PQPR); Creating and assuring academic pathways; Updating program of studies as needed; Integrating contemporary instructional technology to meet the learning needs of a variety of learners and to ensure accessibility incompliance with AODA standards; and Analyze the program map and program curriculum to identify gaps and redundancies. 6.1.4. For the development of a new program of study, program or curriculum development teams are to ensure that the course outcomes are developed for all courses in advance of program delivery to ensure the entire curriculum addresses all the Program Learning Outcomes, and Essential Employability Skill Outcomes. 6.2. Individual faculty 6.2.1. Design curriculum that reflects current and leading edge sector requirements; 6.2.2. Design curriculum that is appropriate to the occupational requirements and assists students in understanding the scope of their chosen occupational/professional career; 6.2.3. Ensures that learning outcomes are operationally meaningful in that they provide a sound basis for curriculum development and student learning assessment and support and reflect the related program learning outcomes; 6.2.4. Ensures that student requirements and obligations are stated and are derived from, and flow coherently from, the program s stated learning outcomes. 6.2.5. Implements assessment strategies to determine the learner s level of achievement of the stated course and program learning outcomes; 6.2.6. Designs curriculum to provide students with vocationally meaningful and relevant ways of demonstrating essential employability skills and that are appropriate for the credential; Page 4 of 6

6.2.7. Designs and documents all teaching/learning activities and resources; 6.2.8. Determines eligibility for PLAR and developing assessment tools; 6.2.9. Executes curriculum changes based on program map and analysis; 6.2.10. Tracks implementation of curriculum changes; 6.2.11. Updates curriculum with respect to technology advances. 6.2.12. Designs curriculum that supports accessibility for all students through the use of universal design for learning principles. 6.3. Academic dean/associate dean The role of the academic dean/associate dean is to: ensure program alignment with the college s strategic direction, assign the responsibility for preparation and revision of course outlines/curriculum, support the program team by consulting and/or collaborating with the program team about their team activities, and to participate in decision-making. This also includes ensuring program learning outcomes/curriculum are reviewed annually to ensure learning outcomes remain relevant and changes are made when necessary. 6.4. Curriculum specialist The role of a Curriculum Specialist is to provide curriculum-related expertise to program teams as requested or required, such as course outline support, program mapping and analysis support, course and program learning outcome development and the development of authentic assessments aligned to course learning outcomes. The curriculum specialist may also include other faculty developers where appropriate. 7. Accessibility for Ontarians with Disabilities Act (AODA) considerations Durham College s commitment to accessibility and AODA standards has been considered in the development of this policy and it adheres to the principles outlined in the AODA standards and Durham College Accessibility Policy (ADMIN-203). 8. Related policies, procedures and directives Minister s Binding Policy Directive: Framework for Programs of Instruction Ministry of Advanced Education and Skills Development Program Standards Durham College Curriculum Development Policy ACAD-102 Durham College Course Outline Policy ACAD-108 and Procedure ACAD-108.1 Durham College Program Learning Outcomes Policy ACAD-120 and Procedure ACAD-120.1 Durham College Program Review and Renewal Policy ACAD-105 and Procedure ACAD-105.1 Page 5 of 6

Durham College New Program Development Policy ACAD-104 and Procedure ACAD-104.1 Durham College Program Quality Assurance Process Policy ACAD-121 and Procedure ACAD-121.1 Durham College Program Change Policy ACAD-124 and Procedure ACAD-124.1 Durham College Faculty Skills and Abilities Competency Matrix Postsecondary Education Quality Assessment Board, Handbook for Ontario Colleges Page 6 of 6