Student Impact of the College Orientation for New Students

Similar documents
READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

STEM Academy Workshops Evaluation

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

A Diverse Student Body

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

Educational Attainment

PUBLIC INFORMATION POLICY

Los Angeles City College Student Equity Plan. Signature Page

OFFICE OF ENROLLMENT MANAGEMENT. Annual Report

Access Center Assessment Report

08-09 DATA REVIEW AND ACTION PLANS Candidate Reports

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT

Office of Institutional Effectiveness 2012 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) DIVERSITY ANALYSIS BY CLASS LEVEL AND GENDER VISION

2005 National Survey of Student Engagement: Freshman and Senior Students at. St. Cloud State University. Preliminary Report.

A Decision Tree Analysis of the Transfer Student Emma Gunu, MS Research Analyst Robert M Roe, PhD Executive Director of Institutional Research and

Student attrition at a new generation university

10/6/2017 UNDERGRADUATE SUCCESS SCHOLARS PROGRAM. Founded in 1969 as a graduate institution.

SASKATCHEWAN MINISTRY OF ADVANCED EDUCATION

2012 New England Regional Forum Boston, Massachusetts Wednesday, February 1, More Than a Test: The SAT and SAT Subject Tests

It s not me, it s you : An Analysis of Factors that Influence the Departure of First-Year Students of Color

U VA THE CHANGING FACE OF UVA STUDENTS: SSESSMENT. About The Study

CAMPUS PROFILE MEET OUR STUDENTS UNDERGRADUATE ADMISSIONS. The average age of undergraduates is 21; 78% are 22 years or younger.

DUAL ENROLLMENT ADMISSIONS APPLICATION. You can get anywhere from here.

KENT STATE UNIVERSITY

IS FINANCIAL LITERACY IMPROVED BY PARTICIPATING IN A STOCK MARKET GAME?

California State University, Los Angeles TRIO Upward Bound & Upward Bound Math/Science

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Data Glossary. Summa Cum Laude: the top 2% of each college's distribution of cumulative GPAs for the graduating cohort. Academic Honors (Latin Honors)

Transportation Equity Analysis

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

Implementing Our Revised General Education Program

Evaluation of a College Freshman Diversity Research Program

What is related to student retention in STEM for STEM majors? Abstract:

2010 National Survey of Student Engagement University Report

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

National Survey of Student Engagement Spring University of Kansas. Executive Summary

National Survey of Student Engagement The College Student Report

Evaluation of Teach For America:

EXPANSION PACKET Revision: 2015

The Demographic Wave: Rethinking Hispanic AP Trends

Adapt and Overcome: Helping Student Veterans Transition to Academic Life

RAISING ACHIEVEMENT BY RAISING STANDARDS. Presenter: Erin Jones Assistant Superintendent for Student Achievement, OSPI

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE)

DO SOMETHING! Become a Youth Leader, Join ASAP. HAVE A VOICE MAKE A DIFFERENCE BE PART OF A GROUP WORKING TO CREATE CHANGE IN EDUCATION

Demographic Survey for Focus and Discussion Groups

Effective Recruitment and Retention Strategies for Underrepresented Minority Students: Perspectives from Dental Students

Practices Worthy of Attention Step Up to High School Chicago Public Schools Chicago, Illinois

Facts and Figures Office of Institutional Research and Planning

ReFresh: Retaining First Year Engineering Students and Retraining for Success

The Diversity of STEM Majors and a Strategy for Improved STEM Retention

Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient

SUNY Downstate Medical Center Brooklyn, NY

Undergraduates Views of K-12 Teaching as a Career Choice

Do multi-year scholarships increase retention? Results

ADMISSION TO THE UNIVERSITY

Supply and Demand of Instructional School Personnel

What Is The National Survey Of Student Engagement (NSSE)?

APPLICANT INFORMATION. Area Code: Phone: Area Code: Phone:

Learning Objectives by Course Matrix Objectives Course # Course Name Psyc Know ledge

File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Value of Athletics in Higher Education March Prepared by Edward J. Ray, President Oregon State University

An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Mexican American Studies Participation on Student Achievement within Tucson Unified School District

Best Colleges Main Survey

SMILE Noyce Scholars Program Application

NC Education Oversight Committee Meeting

MAINE 2011 For a strong economy, the skills gap must be closed.

TxEIS Secondary Grade Reporting Semester 2 & EOY Checklist for txgradebook

Raw Data Files Instructions

Data Diskette & CD ROM

RCPCH MMC Cohort Study (Part 4) March 2016

History. 344 History. Program Student Learning Outcomes. Faculty and Offices. Degrees Awarded. A.A. Degree: History. College Requirements

Association Between Categorical Variables

Fostering Equity and Student Success in Higher Education

Financial Aid & Merit Scholarships Workshop

Enrollment Trends. Past, Present, and. Future. Presentation Topics. NCCC enrollment down from peak levels

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

ECON 365 fall papers GEOS 330Z fall papers HUMN 300Z fall papers PHIL 370 fall papers

New Jersey Institute of Technology Newark College of Engineering

UW-Waukesha Pre-College Program. College Bound Take Charge of Your Future!

LIM College New York, NY

Creating a Culture of Transfer

Communities in Schools of Virginia

(Includes a Detailed Analysis of Responses to Overall Satisfaction and Quality of Academic Advising Items) By Steve Chatman

Arden Middle Secondary Main Report

HONORS OPTION GUIDELINES

Azusa Pacific University Azusa, CA

Freshman Admission Application 2016

Principal vacancies and appointments

USE OF ONLINE PUBLIC ACCESS CATALOGUE IN GURU NANAK DEV UNIVERSITY LIBRARY, AMRITSAR: A STUDY

John F. Kennedy Middle School

ACHE DATA ELEMENT DICTIONARY as of October 6, 1998

Upward Bound Math & Science Program

1. Faculty responsible for teaching those courses for which a test is being used as a placement tool.

Lesson M4. page 1 of 2

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

National Collegiate Retention and Persistence to Degree Rates

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity

Shyness and Technology Use in High School Students. Lynne Henderson, Ph. D., Visiting Scholar, Stanford

LaGuardia Community College Retention Committee Report June, 2006

Transcription:

Student Impact of the College Orientation for New Students Los Medanos College August 1997 Some evidence exists that College Orientations cut the attrition rate in higher education (Donk and Hinkle, 1971), provide students with a better understanding of academic expectations (Cole and Ivey, 1967), give a clearer understanding of the role of a student (Rising, 1967), and provide students with a view of the college environment (Foxley, 1969). As a student retention strategy, the primary purpose of college orientations is to ease the transition to college and to aid the student during the initial adjustment period (Titley, 1985) the purpose of this exploratory study is to examine any association of orientation participation with three educational outcomes and student self-reported benefit from orientation participation. It is important to note that this study is descriptive in nature and does not imply causation. Fall 1994 first-time freshman orientation participants are compared to non-participants with respect to the following educational outcomes: First Semester Retention, First-to-Second Semester Persistence, and First Semester College GPA. Findings from two qualitative studies in reference to LMC's orientation are also summarized (Student Experiences with College Life, Fall 1994; and Student Experiences with the Registration Process, Fall 1996). Operational Definitions: Definitions for course Retention and Success rates used in this study are those recommended and adopted by the Research and Planning Group of Community Colleges in California (June 1996). They are: Course Retention: Student is retained in the course to the end of term. A,B,C,D,F,CR,NC,I grade notations. Rate is calculated as follows: A,B,C,D,F,CR,NC,I Retention Rate = x 100 A,B,C,D,F,CR,NC,W,I Course Success: Student succeeds in the course. A,B,C,CR grade notations and its rate is calculated as follows: A,B,C,CR Success Rate = x 100 A,B,C,D,F,CR,NC,W,I Summary of Findings: 34% of first-time students attended LMC s Orientation for new students -- mostly are students with long-range goals. Those who participated in the orientation had higher first-to-second semester persistence rate than those who did not participate. A study on LMC's Students Experiences with College Life (Fall 1994), revealed that orientation is most helpful to students in selecting Math & English classes, in understanding LMC s enrollment procedures, and in understanding the college policies. In another study on Student Experiences with the Registration Process (Fall 1996), findings revealed that participating in the orientation helps students clarify their educational goals, become more aware of the courses and programs available, and select classes to meet their educational objectives. These descriptive findings suggest that college orientation seems to be an effective strategy to inform students about college services and expectations, and orientations should not be expected to be associated with long term student outcomes, such as persistence, retention and academic performance.

Results Participants: There were 1142 first-time freshmen in the fall of 1994, as identified through LMC s research files. Of these, 386 (34%) participated in the orientation, 723 (64%) did not, and 33 (3%) were exempt (Figure 1). Figure 1. Percentage of Fall 1994 First Time Students who Participated in LMC's College Orientation (n=1142) No 63% Exempt 3% Yes 34% Participation Rates by Demographics: In comparing the demographics by group (participants vs. non-participants), the data show that Filipino and Asian students participate in the orientation in slightly greater proportions than other students do. Also, females and younger students are more likely to participate in the orientation. Ethnicity Table 1. Student Orientation Participation Status: Demographics PARTICIPANTS NON-PARTICIPANTS EXEMPT ALL STUDENTS 34% 63% (n=33) 3% (n=1142) n % n % n % n % Non-Respondent 17 20% 69 79% 1 1% 87 8% Caucasian 201 34% 375 63% 22 4% 598 52% Latino 78 38% 126 61% 4 2% 208 18% Am. Indian 2 15% 11 85% 0 0% 13 1% Asian 27 42% 35 54% 3 5% 65 6% Af. American 37 31% 81 68% 2 2% 120 11% Filipino 24 47% 26 51% 1 2% 51 4% Gender Male 141 27% 365 70% 13 3% 519 45% Female 245 39% 358 57% 20 3% 623 55% Age Group 19 and Younger 228 58% 161 41% 5 1% 394 35% 20-24 62 41% 82 55% 6 4% 150 13% 25-29 21 21% 70 71% 7 7% 98 9% 30-34 27 25% 77 72% 3 3% 107 9% 35-39 20 25% 56 69% 5 6% 81 7% 40 and Older 25 16% 126 80% 7 4% 158 14% Unknown 3 2% 151 98% 0 0% 154 13% 2

Participation Rates by Educational Objective: It appears that students with long-term goals (e.g., transfer, earn a certificate or degree) are more likely to participate in the orientation than students with short-term goals (e.g., pursue personal interest) Table 2. Table 2. Student Orientation Participation Status by Degree Objective Participants Non-Participants Exempt 34% 63% (n=33) 3% n % n % n % Transfer with AA 33 54% 27 44% 1 2% Transfer without AA 136 86% 22 14% 1 1% Vocational Degree 22 36% 39 64% 0 0% G.E. Degree 27 66% 14 34% 0 0% Certificate 52 55% 40 43% 2 2% Learn New Job Skills 54 36% 88 58% 9 6% Maintain Certif. or Lic. 1 4% 21 91% 1 4% Improve Basic Skills 6 9% 61 91% 0 0% Pursue Personal Interest 3 3% 82 85% 11 11% Update Current Job Skills 2 3% 64 90% 5 7% Complete H.S. Credits 0 0% 40 100% 0 0% Undecided 48 21% 182 78% 2 1% Explore Career Interests 2 4% 43 93% 1 2% Overall Educational Outcomes: No significant group differences were found with respect to first-semester retention rates. Non-Participants had higher firstsemester academic performance than Participants. However, orientation Participants had higher first-to-second semester persistence rates than non-participants. Table 3. Educational Outcomes by Participation Status PARTICIPANTS NON-PARTICIPANTS EXEMPT (n=33) n % n % n % 1 st Sem. Retention 353 91% 648 90% 30 91% 1 st Sem. Avg. Cum. GPA 2.64 3.06 2.88 1 st to 2 nd Sem. persistence 253 66% 201 28% 12 36% Figure 2. First-to-Second Semester Persistence Rate by Orientation Participation Status 100% 50% 66% 28% 36% 41% 0% Participated Did Not Participate Exempt Overall 3

Educational Outcomes by Ethnicity and Gender: No significant differences were found for first-semester retention rates when controlling for ethnicity and gender (Tables 4 and 5). Consistent with overall findings, first-semester academic performance was found to be generally higher for Non- Participants when controlling for ethnicity (Table 6) and gender (Table 7). Semester persistence rates where higher for orientation Participants after controlling for ethnicity (Table 8) and gender (Table 9). Table 4. First-Semester Retention Rates by Ethnicity n % n % Non-Respondent 16 94% 60 87% Caucasian 185 92% 336 90% Latino 70 90% 110 87% Am. Indian 2 100% 11 100% Asian 24 89% 33 94% Af. American 33 89% 75 93% Filipino 23 96% 23 88% Overall 353 91% 648 90% Table 5. First-Semester Retention Rates by Gender n % n % Male 130 92% 325 89% Female 223 91% 323 90% Overall 353 91% 648 90% Table 6. First-Semester Average Cumulative GPA by Ethnicity Overall n GPA N GPA n GPA Non-Respondent 14 2.54 39 2.69 53 2.65 Caucasian 162 2.76 198 3.36 360 3.09 Latino 56 2.38 69 2.80 125 2.62 Am. Indian 2 2.72 8 3.00 10 2.94 Asian 22 2.87 22 2.50 44 2.69 Af. American 21 2.16 48 2.80 69 2.61 Filipino 20 2.71 14 2.93 34 2.80 Overall 297 2.64 398 3.06 695 2.88 Table 7. First-Semester Average Cumulative GPA by Gender Overall n GPA n GPA n GPA Male 109 2.54 232 3.16 341 2.96 Female 188 2.70 166 2.92 354 2.81 Overall 297 2.64 398 3.06 695 2.88 4

Table 8. First-to-Second Semester Persistence by Ethnicity N % n % Non-Respondent 13 76% 22 32% Caucasian 137 68% 92 25% Latino 52 67% 39 31% Am. Indian 1 50% 1 9% Asian 14 52% 14 40% Af. American 19 51% 22 27% Filipino 17 71% 11 42% Overall 253 66% 201 28% Table 9. First-to-Second Semester Persistence by Gender N % n % Male 93 66% 97 27% Female 160 65% 104 29% Overall 253 66% 201 28% Benefits of College Orientation: In a study about LMC's Student Experiences with College Life (Fall 1994), over 80% of the students reported that participating in LMC s orientation for new students MODERATELY or VERY much helped them in selecting their Math and English classes, and in understanding enrollment procedures; 74% reported that the Orientation helped them in understanding college policies, and in understanding college services and programs (Figure 3): Figure 3. Extent to Which the Orientation for First-Time Students was Helpful in the Following Selecting MATH and ENGLISH classes 12% 31% 53% Understanding enrollment procedures 11% 35% 49% College policies and procedures 22% 46% 28% Understanding services/programs 20% 48% 27% The amount of work required in class 30% 43% 23% Clarifying your educational goals 38% 43% 15% Slightly Moderately Very 5

College Aspects (n=475) More recently, a study on Students Experiences with the Registration Process (Fall 1996), revealed that most students who participated in the orientation felt that the orientation helped them clarify their educational goals, become more aware of the courses and programs available, and in selecting classes to meet their educational objectives (Table 10). Table 10. Extent of Helpfulness of New Student Orientation (From Student Experiences with the Registration Process study, Fall 1996) ORIENTATION HELPED VERY MODERATELY SLIGHTLY NOT AT ALL NOT COVERED Clarify Educational Goals 47% 37% 16% --- --- Understand Enrollment Procedures 47% 32% 11% 5% 5% Class Selection to Meet Ed. Obj. 50% 33% 11% 6% --- Awareness of Courses and Progs. Avail. 58% 21% 11% 11% --- Awareness of Srvcs. Offered 32% 32% 16% 10% 10% Learning How to Succeed in College 21% 26% 37% 11% 5% Become Aware of Class Work Required 27% 42% 21% 5% 5% Become Aware of College Policies/Procedures 26% 42% 11% 16% 5% Source: Student Experiences with College Life Study, Fall 1994. 6