Secondary School Pupil Premium Funding Report

Similar documents
Plans for Pupil Premium Spending

Ferry Lane Primary School

Approval Authority: Approval Date: September Support for Children and Young People

Total amount of PPG expected for the year ,960. Objectives of spending PPG: In addition to the key principles, Oakdale Junior School:

This has improved to above national from 95.1 % in 2013 to 96.83% in 2016 Attainment

Pupil Premium Impact Assessment

PUPIL PREMIUM POLICY

PUPIL PREMIUM REVIEW

St Philip Howard Catholic School

Pupil Premium Grants. Information for Parents. April 2016

Oasis Academy Coulsdon

Evaluation of pupil premium grant expenditure 2015/16 Review Date: 16th July 2016

Head of Maths Application Pack

Teacher of English. MPS/UPS Information for Applicants

Putnoe Primary School

SEN INFORMATION REPORT

Teacher of Art & Design (Maternity Cover)

Cottesmore St Mary Catholic Primary School Pupil premium strategy

Archdiocese of Birmingham

Tutor Trust Secondary

Newlands Girls School

SEND INFORMATION REPORT

Sixth Form Admissions Procedure

Inspection dates Overall effectiveness Good Summary of key findings for parents and pupils This is a good school

Alma Primary School. School report. Summary of key findings for parents and pupils. Inspection dates March 2015

Special Educational Needs and Disability (SEND) Policy

Oasis Academy South Bank

DIOCESE OF PLYMOUTH VICARIATE FOR EVANGELISATION CATECHESIS AND SCHOOLS

29 th April Mrs Diana Dryland Headteacher Bursted Wood Primary School Swanbridge Road Bexley Heath Kent DA7 5BS

Guide for primary schools

Summary: Impact Statement

Short inspection of Maria Fidelis Roman Catholic Convent School FCJ

Pentyrch Primary School Ysgol Gynradd Pentyrch

Effective Pre-school and Primary Education 3-11 Project (EPPE 3-11)

Special Educational Needs & Disabilities (SEND) Policy

Special Educational Needs School Information Report

CARDINAL NEWMAN CATHOLIC SCHOOL

5 Early years providers

Changes to GCSE and KS3 Grading Information Booklet for Parents

Woodlands Primary School. Policy for the Education of Children in Care

St Michael s Catholic Primary School

Research Update. Educational Migration and Non-return in Northern Ireland May 2008

FARLINGAYE HIGH SCHOOL

The Waldegrave Trust Waldegrave School, Fifth Cross Road, Twickenham, TW2 5LH TEL: , FAX:

SEN SUPPORT ACTION PLAN Page 1 of 13 Read Schools to include all settings where appropriate.

Special Educational Needs and Disability (SEND) Policy. November 2016

Reviewed December 2015 Next Review December 2017 SEN and Disabilities POLICY SEND

Archdiocese of Birmingham

LITERACY ACROSS THE CURRICULUM POLICY Humberston Academy

ERDINGTON ACADEMY PROSPECTUS 2016/17

St Matthew s RC High School

Thameside Primary School Rationale for Assessment against the National Curriculum

Eastbury Primary School

Pupil premium strategy statement

WOODBRIDGE HIGH SCHOOL

A LIBRARY STRATEGY FOR SUTTON 2015 TO 2019

I set out below my response to the Report s individual recommendations.

Preparing for the School Census Autumn 2017 Return preparation guide. English Primary, Nursery and Special Phase Schools Applicable to 7.

Special Education Needs & Disability (SEND) Policy

The Curriculum in Primary Schools

Local offer aspect. a) General information. Admission arrangements to schools, settings or FE Colleges

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability

School Improvement Plan

This Access Agreement covers all relevant University provision delivered on-campus or in our UK partner institutions.

2015 Annual Report to the School Community

Curriculum Policy. November Independent Boarding and Day School for Boys and Girls. Royal Hospital School. ISI reference.

Special Educational Needs Policy (including Disability)

St Matthew s RC High School, Nuthurst Road, Moston, Manchester, M40 0EW

A journey to medicine: Routes into medicine

Teacher of Psychology and Health and Social Care

Exclusions Policy. Policy reviewed: May 2016 Policy review date: May OAT Model Policy

LITERACY ACROSS THE CURRICULUM POLICY

Bramcote Hills Primary School Special Educational Needs and Disability Policy (SEND) Inclusion Manager: Miss Susan Clarke

Diary Dates Half Term First Day Back Friday 4th April

HUNTINGTON SCHOOL, YORK. School Development Plan STATUS: Ratified at the Full Governing Body meeting 14 June 2017

Language learning in primary and secondary schools in England Findings from the 2012 Language Trends survey

About our academy. Joining our community

Information Pack: Exams Officer. Abbey College Cambridge

Local authority National Indicator Map 2009

Classroom Teacher Primary Setting Job Description

Assessment booklet Assessment without levels and new GCSE s

Measuring Efficiency in English Schools, Techniques, Policy Implications and Practicalities

APPLICANT S INFORMATION PACK

Initial teacher training in vocational subjects

Young people s educational attainment in London s Turkish, Turkish Kurdish and Turkish Cypriot Communities. A report for the Mayor of London s Office

Charging and Remissions Policy. The Axholme Academy. October 2016

IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON ACCESS AGREEMENT

PROPOSED MERGER - RESPONSE TO PUBLIC CONSULTATION

Allington Primary School Inspection report - amended

2016 School Performance Information

Executive Summary. Laurel County School District. Dr. Doug Bennett, Superintendent 718 N Main St London, KY

This Access Agreement is for only, to align with the WPSA and in light of the Browne Review.

Inspection report British International School

QIs 3.4, 4.4. Student Support. discussions. staff team. Reports in place. participating in. self evaluation procedures. All students.

Abbey Academies Trust. Every Child Matters

Annual School Report 2014 [school code] 1682

Aurora College Annual Report

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Practice Learning Handbook

PLEASE SCROLL DOWN FOR ARTICLE. Full terms and conditions of use:

Transcription:

Secondary School Pupil Premium Funding Report 2016/17 and 2017/18 Name of School Eden Boys School, Birmingham The pupil premium is additional funding for publicly funded schools in England to raise the attainment of disadvantaged pupils of all abilities and to close the gaps between them and their peers. How much pupil premium funding did the school receive in 2016/17 and how many pupils were eligible for support through this fund? Eden Boys School Birmingham received 58,905 for the academic year 2016/17 for 63 pupils. What did the school spend it on? Area of spend 2016/17 Pupil Premium Guarantee 6300 Extra English teacher (0.5) 14365 Extra Maths Teacher (0.5) 14365 Performance Review Meetings- Year 7 3324 Performance Review Meetings- Year 8 3493 Performance Review Meetings- Year 9 2211 Rewards System 4000 Aston Villa Social Enterprise 300 Library books for pupils with low reading ages 5717.44 Intervention resources 4829.56 Total Spend 58905 What were the reasons for these spending decisions? Enable parents to have a Pupil Premium Guarantee which allows all disadvantaged pupils to receive: Free books, stationery, revision resources Free educational visits and trips A free breakfast 100 towards the cost of uniform Free access to all intervention and enrichment activities

Enable disadvantaged pupils to close the gap in their performance in English and Maths through: Small group intervention, delivered by teachers Smaller class sizes, through additional teachers in English and Maths Support in lessons, through the deployment of support staff in English and Maths Regular performance review meetings with parents if their son is underperforming Raise aspirations and ambition in disadvantaged pupils through: -Access to careers marketing event, guidance and mentors. -Mentoring and nurturing via senior leaders and peer mentors. What strategies have been used to monitor and evaluate the impact of pupil premium funding? To monitor and evaluate the impact of pupil premium funding, the school: Formally assesses pupils in each subject at least once every half-term Closely tracks and analyses the progress of pupils on a half-termly basis Reports to the Trust Central Office and the Local Governing Body Regularly on the performance of disadvantaged pupils What difference did the use of pupil premium funding make to outcomes for supported pupils in 2016/17? The Pupil Premium allows us to focus our resources more effectively on those pupils who are most likely to fail to achieve due to their socio-economic background. In particular this has led to the school achieving outstanding progress for its pupils who come from disadvantaged backgrounds. Eden Boys School Birmingham has been forecasted Outstanding in the DfE monitoring visits and QA visits In 2017, 95.8% of Y9 pupils from disadvantaged backgrounds were forecasted 9-4, and 75% forecasted 9-5, in English and Maths. Nationally, around a third of pupils from disadvantaged backgrounds achieve 9-4 in English and Maths and around a quarter of such pupils achieve 9-5 in English and Maths. In 2017, the Attainment 8 score, which reflects the average grade across eight academically challenging subjects, was 57.21 for Y9, forecasting the school to be ranked highly amongst non-selective schools. In 2017, the Attainment 8 forecasts score for disadvantaged pupils in Y9 was 58.25. In 2017, the Progress 8 score, which reflects progress achieved across eight academically challenging subjects, was 0.77 for Y9. In 2017, the Progress 8 forecasts score for disadvantaged pupils in Y9 was 0.66. Attendance Nationally disadvantaged children are heavily over-represented in absence statistics and exclusions from school. For example children eligible for Free School Meals are almost twice as likely to be absent and 4 times more likely to be excluded than those who are not eligible.

The overall absence rate for pupils who have been eligible for free school meals in the last 6 years (FSM Ever 6) was 6.4 per cent, a slightly lower rate than those currently eligible and claiming FSM. The equivalent rate for those that are not eligible for free school meals in the last 6 years was 3.8 At Eden Boys School, Birmingham the overall attendance for 2016-2017 was 98.5% compared to the national average for secondary schools of 94.9%. The average attendance for children from disadvantaged backgrounds at Eden was 98.7% Forecast outcomes Non-disadvantaged pupils: national headlines in 2016 School level forecast outcomes 2021 for disadvantaged pupils (Y7) School level forecast outcomes 2020 for disadvantaged pupils (Y8) School level forecast outcomes 2019 for disadvantaged pupils (Y9) Pupils achieving English and mathematics at grade 4 or above Disadvantaged pupils entered for English Baccalaureate Disadvantaged pupils achieving English Baccalaureate 70.6% 97% 88% 96% 45.2% 100% 100% 100% 29.7% 95% 73% 92% Summary comments on the impact of pupil premium funding The Pupil Premium allows us to focus our resources more effectively on those students who are most likely to fail to achieve due to their socio-economic background. In particular, this has led to the school achieving outstanding progress for its students who come from disadvantaged backgrounds. The Eden Boys School, Birmingham GCSE forecasts, based on end of year exam results, show that disadvantaged students at the school are set to outperform even the non-disadvantaged pupils figure nationally. 96% of students from disadvantaged backgrounds are predicted to achieve 9-4, and 75% predicted to achieve 9-5, in English and Maths in 2019. 88% of Year 8 students from a disadvantaged background are predicted to achieve 9-4, 85% predicted to achieve 9-5, in English and Maths in 2020. 97% of students from disadvantaged backgrounds are predicted to achieve 9-4, and 78% predicted to achieve 9-5, in English and Maths in 2021. Eden Boys School assessment data for all cohorts indicates that both disadvantaged and nondisadvantaged pupils are making significantly better progress in English and mathematics than is the case nationally.

How much pupil premium funding has the school received for 2017/18? Eden Boys is due to receive 98,175 for the academic year 2017/18 for 105 pupils. The funding will focus on addressing the inequalities between disadvantaged pupils and their peers and help close the gap. What are the main barriers to future success for pupils in school who are eligible for pupil premium funding (including for those pupils who are most able)? In-school barriers Low level reading skills for Years 8-10 compared to the National All. Particularly for Year 10, due to sit their GCSE, but with KS2 reading scores that are 6% below (81% expected standard) the National Average for boys (87% expected standard) and 8% below the National All (89% expected standard). Extended writing: including spelling, punctuation and grammar, is less well developed. Cursive writing has been identified as an issue for all year groups. Low level mathematics for Years 8-10. Particularly for Year 10, due to sit their GCSE, but with KS2 Maths scores that are 5% below (81% expected standard) the National Average for boys, and the National All (both at 86% expected standard). External barriers EAL: All pupils are classed as coming from an ethnic minority background. 41.2% of the new Y7 cohort have English as an Additional Language (National Average 15.7%), from these, over half (63%) are also eligible for Pupil Premium. Deprivation: The school s LSOA is ranked in the 3rd decile for the IMD (where 1st is the most deprived) i.e. geographically in the bottom 30% nationally for deprivation indicator. 81% of households in the area are deprived in up to and including 4 dimensions including: unemployment, lack of higher education, disability and overcrowding (Aston, UK 2011 Census). SEND: A high incidence of double disadvantage i.e. students who have both SEND and are eligible for Pupil Premium. Of the 46 SEND students in the school, nearly 50% have a double disadvantage of also being eligible for Pupil Premium. Quality of Primary Education: Only 18.9% of the primary schools in Birmingham have been judged Outstanding. One of our main feeder primary schools (22% of pupils) has been judged by Ofsted to be Inadequate for some time. The remaining pupils come from approximately 100 different primary schools. What are the key objectives of the Pupil Premium strategy at the school? Quality First Teaching- Outstanding performance comes out of high quality teaching and learning on a day to day basis, consequently our major focus, is to continue to develop the capacity and skills of all our staff. The growth model of staffing requires a high focus on quality and continual professional development for all teaching and associate staff. Our specific objectives are as follows: Outstanding progress: to ensure disadvantaged pupils make similar progress as all pupils nationally. Full curriculum access: to ensure disadvantaged pupils are sufficiently literate and numerate to access and succeed in all curriculum areas. Breadth of experience: to ensure the well-being of disadvantaged pupils and encourage their engagement in a wide range of sporting and cultural extra curriculum activities.

Pupil premium spending plan 2017/18 Objective: Improvement in the tracking, identification, intervention and outcomes relating to the achievement, attendance and well-being of disadvantaged pupils Action Cost Success criteria 1.1 Further embedding of the use of Capita SIMs to monitor and analyse progress of disadvantaged pupils 895.00 Improvement in the accuracy of tracking and the speed in which analysis and identification of all underachieving pupils is achieved The development of progression maps in all subjects to monitor Levels of Progress ensuring expected progress is clearly identified for ALL pupils. 1.2 Continued development of middle leaders in analysis and evaluation of data and construction of Individual Learning Plans. 1.3 Training and development of Pastoral Team 1.4 Sustain exceptional attendance 1.5 Staffing and resourcing of a Nurture Group for KS3 1495.00 Improved T&L and curriculum provision within faculties Improved accuracy and quality assurance of teacher assessment Timely identification of those pupils who are underachieving and the specific barriers/factors which contribute. Targeted, specific and timely interventions for both individual pupils and small groups No in school Gap in achievement of those pupils who are disadvantaged 1000.00 Focus on Restorative Practices to resolve conflict Nil Reduction in condoned absence including parental requests for holidays in term time 1000.00 All pupils needs assessed and comprehensive Pupil Support Plans compiled to ensure appropriate ongoing provision Pupils in group making expected progress from KS2 in

Objective: reading, writing, communication and mathematics Social and emotional literacy levels improve Enjoyment in learning voiced by pupils and their parents/carers Improvement in standards of Teaching and Learning across the school which will disproportionately advantage those pupils who are disadvantaged Action Cost Success criteria 2.1 Appointment of additional teacher in English and Maths. Focus CPD on differentiated approaches 2.2 Appointment of HLTA 2.3 Focus on the improvement of teacher feedback and pupil response 2.4 Improvements in teacher appraisal and review Objective: 57746.00 Expected progress in both English and Maths by disadvantaged pupils in line with non-disadvantaged pupils nationally by end of 2018. This includes those disadvantaged pupils who are more able. 22369.00 Expected progress in both English and Maths by disadvantaged pupils in line with non-disadvantaged pupils nationally by end of 2018. Nil Nil Specific Initiatives to raise achievement of disadvantaged pupils QA process shows quality of marking and feedback is exemplary across the school resulting in outstanding progress across the curriculum Lesson observations provide evidence that attitudes to learning of all pupils is exemplary Reports from external Inspectors confirm that attitudes to learning of all pupils is exceptional Robust PM for all teaching staff based upon SMART, career stage targets and regular interim reviews Robust action plans for all NQT s based upon SMART targets to ensure improvement 100% of teaching across school is Good or better Action Cost Success criteria

3.1 Group sizes in English/Maths smaller than average for school 3.2 Performance Review Meetings 3.3 Improve Literacy levels in KS3 Improve literacy resources and facilities 3.4 Pupil Premium Guarantee 57746.00 (as 2.1) Progress for pupils in receipt of pupil premium is judged as Good with all pupils making expected progress towards their target grades or are rapidly diminishing the difference xpp pupils make similar progress to their peers, reflecting good use of the Pupil Premium Funding. English progress for disadvantaged pupils is well above that of nondisadvantaged pupils nationally Maths progress for disadvantaged pupils is well above that of nondisadvantaged pupils nationally 3456.00 The development of reading, writing and communication across the curriculum is rapidly improving Systems of tracking chronological reading age to actual reading age at KS3 show that 80% of identified PP pupils are on track to achieve targets 10500.00 No gap in student progress and attainment between disadvantaged pupils and nondisadvantaged pupils nationally How will the impact of pupil premium spending be measured? To monitor and evaluate the impact of pupil premium funding, the school: Formally assesses students in each subject at least once every half-term. Closely tracks and analyses the progress of students on a half-termly basis. Reports to the Trust Central Office and the Local Governing Body regularly on the performance of disadvantaged students. When will the impact of the 2017/18 funding be reviewed? A review of the 2017/18 funding will be posted on the school s website at http://www.edenboysbirmingham.com/inclusion/pupil-premium/ on 1st September 2018