Participating Effectively in District and College Governance The Law, Regulation and Guidelines

Similar documents
P A S A D E N A C I T Y C O L L E G E SHARED GOVERNANCE

Guidelines for the Use of the Continuing Education Unit (CEU)

Academic Affairs Policy #1

Academic Affairs Policy #1

SCICU Legislative Strategic Plan 2018

State Budget Update February 2016

Policy for Hiring, Evaluation, and Promotion of Full-time, Ranked, Non-Regular Faculty Department of Philosophy

Program Change Proposal:

The Role of Trustee. Pennsylvania State System of Higher Education Seeking student trustee candidates at Slippery Rock University

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF SCHOOLS (K 12)

Pennsylvania Association of Councils of Trustees THE ROLE OF TRUSTEE IN PENNSYLVANIA S STATE SYSTEM OF HIGHER EDUCATION

Friday, October 3, 2014 by 10: a.m. EST

Kelso School District and Kelso Education Association Teacher Evaluation Process (TPEP)

Position Statements. Index of Association Position Statements

Faculty governance especially the

ACCREDITATION STANDARDS

University of Michigan - Flint POLICY ON FACULTY CONFLICTS OF INTEREST AND CONFLICTS OF COMMITMENT

BY-LAWS THE COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING AND COMPUTER SCIENCE THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE AT CHATTANOOGA

College of Business University of South Florida St. Petersburg Governance Document As Amended by the College Faculty on February 10, 2014

House Finance Committee Unveils Substitute Budget Bill

Public Comments (2 minute limit per person) AS Executive Board Reports (15 minutes)

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

VI-1.12 Librarian Policy on Promotion and Permanent Status

Promotion and Tenure Guidelines. School of Social Work

ARKANSAS TECH UNIVERSITY

Raj Soin College of Business Bylaws

APPENDIX A-13 PERIODIC MULTI-YEAR REVIEW OF FACULTY & LIBRARIANS (PMYR) UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS LOWELL

REVIEW CYCLES: FACULTY AND LIBRARIANS** CANDIDATES HIRED ON OR AFTER JULY 14, 2014 SERVICE WHO REVIEWS WHEN CONTRACT

St. Mary Cathedral Parish & School

TITLE 23: EDUCATION AND CULTURAL RESOURCES SUBTITLE A: EDUCATION CHAPTER I: STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION SUBCHAPTER b: PERSONNEL PART 25 CERTIFICATION

REVIEW CYCLES: FACULTY AND LIBRARIANS** CANDIDATES HIRED PRIOR TO JULY 14, 2014 SERVICE WHO REVIEWS WHEN CONTRACT

TABLE OF CONTENTS. By-Law 1: The Faculty Council...3

University of Toronto

2. Related Documents (refer to policies.rutgers.edu for additional information)

CLINICAL TRAINING AGREEMENT

Program Guidebook. Endorsement Preparation Program, Educational Leadership

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

BYLAWS of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan

INDEPENDENT STATE OF PAPUA NEW GUINEA.

USC VITERBI SCHOOL OF ENGINEERING

REQUEST FOR PROPOSALS SUPERINTENDENT SEARCH CONSULTANT

European Higher Education in a Global Setting. A Strategy for the External Dimension of the Bologna Process. 1. Introduction

CONFLICT OF INTEREST CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY, CHICO. Audit Report June 11, 2014

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES AS REVISED BY THE COMMITTEE ON EDUCATION APPROPRIATIONS ANALYSIS

OAKLAND UNIVERSITY CONTRACT TO CHARTER A PUBLIC SCHOOL ACADEMY AND RELATED DOCUMENTS ISSUED TO: (A PUBLIC SCHOOL ACADEMY)

AUTHORITATIVE SOURCES ADULT AND COMMUNITY LEARNING LEARNING PROGRAMMES

Article 15 TENURE. A. Definition

PROPOSAL FOR NEW UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM. Institution Submitting Proposal. Degree Designation as on Diploma. Title of Proposed Degree Program

Pattern of Administration. For the Department of Civil, Environmental and Geodetic Engineering The Ohio State University Revised: 6/15/2012

1) AS /AA (Rev): Recognizing the Integration of Sustainability into California State University (CSU) Academic Endeavors

AGENDA ITEM VI-E October 2005 Page 1 CHAPTER 13. FINANCIAL PLANNING

Discrimination Complaints/Sexual Harassment

KSBA Staff Review of HB 520 Charter Schools Rep. Carney - (as introduced )

Faculty Voice Task Force 5: Fixed Term Faculty. November 1, 2006

INFORMATION PACKAGE FOR PRINCIPAL SAINTS CATHOLIC COLLEGE JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY

SEARCH PROSPECTUS: Dean of the College of Law

2015 Academic Program Review. School of Natural Resources University of Nebraska Lincoln

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS POLICIES AND PROCEDURES MANUAL

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

Adult Education ACCE Presentation. Neil Kelly February 2, 2017

Rules of Procedure for Approval of Law Schools

Promotion and Tenure standards for the Digital Art & Design Program 1 (DAAD) 2

Marketing Committee Terms of Reference

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN POLITICAL SCIENCE

CONSTITUTION COLLEGE OF LIBERAL ARTS

EXPANSION PROCEDURES AT THE UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA

UCB Administrative Guidelines for Endowed Chairs

Academic Program Assessment Prior to Implementation (Policy and Procedures)

Associate Professor of Electrical Power Systems Engineering (CAE17/06RA) School of Creative Arts and Engineering / Engineering

POLITECNICO DI MILANO

TITLE IX COMPLIANCE SAN DIEGO STATE UNIVERSITY. Audit Report June 14, Henry Mendoza, Chair Steven M. Glazer William Hauck Glen O.

Intervention in Struggling Schools Through Receivership New York State. May 2015

Oklahoma State University Policy and Procedures

CÉGEP HERITAGE COLLEGE POLICY #15

Curriculum for the Academy Profession Degree Programme in Energy Technology

2. Sibling of a continuing student at the school requested. 3. Child of an employee of Anaheim Union High School District.

Contract Language for Educators Evaluation. Table of Contents (1) Purpose of Educator Evaluation (2) Definitions (3) (4)

FACULTY HANDBOOK AND POLICY MANUAL

GENERAL UNIVERSITY POLICY APM REGARDING ACADEMIC APPOINTEES Limitation on Total Period of Service with Certain Academic Titles

General rules and guidelines for the PhD programme at the University of Copenhagen Adopted 3 November 2014

Bilingual Staffing Guidelines

INTER-DISTRICT OPEN ENROLLMENT

Chapter 9 The Beginning Teacher Support Program

Michigan State University

FRANKLIN D. CHAMBERS,

Accommodation for Students with Disabilities

NC Community College System: Overview

Consent for Further Education Colleges to Invest in Companies September 2011

b) Allegation means information in any form forwarded to a Dean relating to possible Misconduct in Scholarly Activity.

Procedures for Academic Program Review. Office of Institutional Effectiveness, Academic Planning and Review

College of Science Promotion & Tenure Guidelines For Use with MU-BOG AA-26 and AA-28 (April 2014) Revised 8 September 2017

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd. Hertfordshire International College


Residential Admissions Procedure Manual

Education in Armenia. Mher Melik-Baxshian I. INTRODUCTION

CERTIFIED TEACHER LICENSURE PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT PLAN

Reference to Tenure track faculty in this document includes tenured faculty, unless otherwise noted.

District Superintendent

Schenectady County Is An Equal Opportunity Employer. Open Competitive Examination

State Improvement Plan for Perkins Indicators 6S1 and 6S2

Transcription:

Participating Effectively in District and College Governance The Law, Regulation and Guidelines ACADEMIC SENATE for California Community Colleges Community College League OF CALIFORNIA

AB 1725 Timeline 1984 1985 1986 CEOs call for review; Legislation establishes Commission for Review of Master Plan; Initial study of community colleges Committees, studies, consultants, hearings Californians for Community Colleges: Towards Excellence Commission report on community colleges: Challenge of Change

AB 1725 Timeline 1987 1988 1989 1990 Legislative Committee report: Building California s Community Colleges AB 1725 signed by governor (Assembly: 74-1; Senate 38-0) $70 million base funds added $70 million more added to base 2006 SB 361 replaced AB 1725 program-based funding formula

AB1725 Concerns Mission Priorities set Common transfer core Remedial limits Fund for Instructional Improvement Governance State and local delineations Eleven point accountability Decision-making

AB1725 Concerns Funding Program based funding (later replaced in SB 361) Program improvement fund (19 areas)

AB1725 Concerns Faculty and Staff Credentials repealed (add minimum qualifications, local hiring criteria, faculty service areas) Tenure to four years Evaluation/peer review Administrator contracts Goals of 75% of credit hours taught by fulltime Staff development Diversity goals

Intent of Reform Enhance community college image Increase support for more money Move from K-12 to higher education Develop more unified system Institutional renewal

Definition Participating effectively in district and college governance is shared involvement in the decision-making process. It does not imply total agreement; The same level of involvement by all is not required; and Final decisions rest with the board or designee.

Value Expertise and analytical skills of many Understanding of objective/decisions Commitment to implementation Leadership opportunities Promotion of trust and cooperation Opportunities for conflict resolution Less dissent

Challenges Participation by individuals with limited expertise Time away from other duties Can require considerable time for decision Shared accountability Differing expectations and understanding Potential conflict if board/designee rejects recommendation

Participatory Governance not a simple process to implement goodwill, thoughtful people, a willingness to take risks and the ability to admit problems exist can go far toward establishing a positive environment The central objective should be creation of a climate where energy is devoted to solving crucial educational tasks and not to turf battles over governance. CCCT/CEOCCC Policy Paper, December 1989

The Law Board of Governors shall establish "minimum standards" and local governing boards shall "establish procedures not inconsistent" with those standards to ensure: Faculty, staff and students the right to participate effectively in district and college governance and The right of academic senates to assume primary responsibility for making recommendations in the areas of curriculum and academic standards. Education Code Sections 70901 and 70902

Regulation: Academic Senates (a) The governing board shall adopt policies for appropriate delegation of authority and responsibility to its academic senate. providing at a minimum the governing board or its designees consult collegially with the academic senate when adopting policies and procedures on academic and professional matters. Title 5 53203

Regulation: Academic Senates Academic and professional matters means the following policy development and implementation matters: Degree and certificate requirements Curriculum, including establishing prerequisites and placing courses within disciplines Grading policies Educational program development Standards or policies regarding student preparation and success District and college governance structures, as related to faculty roles Faculty roles and involvement in accreditation processes, including self study and annual reports Policies for faculty professional development activities Processes for program review Processes for institutional planning and budget development, and Other academic and professional matters as mutually agreed upon between the governing board and the academic senate. Title 5 53200

Question One of the ten areas of "academic and professional matters" is "processes for institutional planning and budget development." Does this regulation relate to the institutional plans and budgets themselves, or only to the process by which plans and budgets are developed for presentation to the board?

Regulation: Academic Senates "Consult collegially" means: Relying primarily upon the advice and judgment of the academic senate; or Reaching mutual agreement between the governing board/designee and representatives of the academic senate. Title 5 53200

Question Who decides which of the two processes in the regulations, rely primarily or mutual agreement, should be used on a given issue?

Question The regulations list ten areas defined as "academic and professional matters." The local board must adopt procedures identifying how it will "consult collegially" in these ten areas. Those procedures include either to "rely primarily upon the advice and judgment of the academic senate" or to "reach mutual agreement." Must a local board select only one procedure for addressing all ten of the identified academic and professional matters, or can there be a different approach used for the different matters?

Regulation: Academic Senates (d)(1) Governing board action: Rely Primarily recommendations of the senate will normally be accepted only in exceptional circumstances and for compelling reasons will the recommendations not be accepted If not accepted, board/designee communicate its reasons in writing, if requested Title 5 53200

Regulation: Academic Senates (d)(2) Governing board action: Mutual Agreement If agreement not reached, existing policy remains in effect unless exposure to legal liability or substantial fiscal hardship. If no policy or existing policy creates exposure to legal liability or substantial fiscal hardship board may act if agreement not reached if good faith effort first only for compelling legal, fiscal, or organizational reasons Title 5 53200

Question If the governing board chooses the option to "rely primarily" on the advice of the academic senate in any of the ten defined areas of "academic and professional matters," is the board required to accept the recommendation of the senate?

Question A district governing board which chooses the "rely primarily" procedure is normally supposed to accept recommendations of the senate in any of the ten defined areas of "academic and professional matters" unless there are "exceptional circumstances" and "compelling reasons." What do these mean?

Question A district governing board which chooses the "mutual agreement" procedure is supposed to reach written agreement with the senate in any of the ten defined areas of "academic and professional matters." When may a board act if it is not able to reach mutual agreement with the academic senate?

Other Legal Provisions Curriculum Committee: Established by mutual agreement of administration and senate Title 5 55002 Administrator Retreat Rights: Process agreed upon jointly; board to rely primarily upon the advice and judgment of the academic senate to determine that the administrator possesses minimum qualifications for employment as a faculty member Ed Code 87458

Other Legal Provisions Equivalencies to Minimum Qualifications: Process, criteria and standards agreed upon jointly by board designee and academic senate Ed Code 87359 Faculty Hiring: Criteria, policies and procedures shall be agreed upon jointly by board designee and academic senate Ed Code 87360

Other Legal Provisions Collective Bargaining Decision-making policies and implementation cannot detract from negotiated agreements on wages and working conditions Academic senate and bargaining representatives may establish agreements as to consulting, collaborating, sharing or delegating (Title 5 53204) In those districts where the following are collectively bargained, the exclusive bargaining agent shall consult with the academic senate prior to engaging in bargaining on: Faculty Evaluation (Ed Code 87663), Tenure (Ed Code 87610.6) and Faculty Service Areas (Ed Code 87743.2)

Regulation: Staff Governing boards adopt policies and procedures that provide staff opportunity to participate effectively in district and college governance. formulation and development of policies and procedures, and processes for jointly developing recommendations that have or will have a significant effect on staff. Board shall not take action on matters significantly affecting staff until the recommendations and opinions of staff are given every reasonable consideration. Title 5 51023.5

Regulation: Students Governing board adopt policies and procedures that provide students opportunity to participate effectively in district and college governance on formulation and development policies and procedures and processes for jointly developing recommendations that have or will have a significant effect on students. Board shall not take action on a matter having a significant effect on students until recommendations and positions by students are given every reasonable consideration. Title 5 51023.7

Regulation: Students Polices and procedure that have a significant effect on students include : (1) grading polices (2) codes of student conduct (3) academic disciplinary policies (4) curriculum development (5) courses or programs which should be initiated or discontinued (6) processes for institutional planning and budget development (7) standards and polices regarding student preparation and success (8) student services planning and development (9) student fees within the authority of the district to adopt (10) any other district and college policy, procedure or related matter that the district governing board determines will have a significant effect on students Title 5 51023.7

Other Legal Provisions (c) policies and procedures pertaining to the hiring and evaluation of faculty, administration, and staff.

Question Does the term rely primarily upon the advice and judgment of the academic senate mean that the governing board should not receive and consider the advice and judgment of others on issues of academic and professional matters?

Question Should the advice the judgment of the academic senate be accorded greater weight than the advice and judgment of other groups and constituencies in connection with academic and professional matters?

Question Do these regulations have the force of law?

Question What powers do the Board of Governors have to enforce Title 5 Regulations such as the ones on strengthening local senates?

Summary Faculty Students Staff Law and Regulation Level of Participation Areas of Participation Consideration of Recommendations

Thank You Michelle Pilati Academic Senate for California Community Colleges www.asccc.org Scott Lay Community College League of California www.ccleague.org