Next Generation Science Standards and the Common Core. Susan Pimentel

Similar documents
Arizona s English Language Arts Standards th Grade ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS

This Performance Standards include four major components. They are

Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District. B or better in Algebra I, or consent of instructor

Achievement Level Descriptors for American Literature and Composition

Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts

Student Name: OSIS#: DOB: / / School: Grade:

English Language Arts Missouri Learning Standards Grade-Level Expectations

Grade 4. Common Core Adoption Process. (Unpacked Standards)

Rendezvous with Comet Halley Next Generation of Science Standards

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT If sub mission ins not a book, cite appropriate location(s))

A Correlation of. Grade 6, Arizona s College and Career Ready Standards English Language Arts and Literacy

MYP Language A Course Outline Year 3

Implementing the English Language Arts Common Core State Standards

and secondary sources, attending to such features as the date and origin of the information.

Oakland Unified School District English/ Language Arts Course Syllabus

Pennsylvania Common Core Standards English Language Arts Grade 11

STEP 1: DESIRED RESULTS

Radius STEM Readiness TM

Prentice Hall Literature Common Core Edition Grade 10, 2012

English 2, Grade 10 Regular, Honors Curriculum Map

FIGURE IT OUT! MIDDLE SCHOOL TASKS. Texas Performance Standards Project

TABE 9&10. Revised 8/2013- with reference to College and Career Readiness Standards

Degree Qualification Profiles Intellectual Skills

Statewide Framework Document for:

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes Gold 2000 Correlated to Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards, (Grade 9)

AND DESIGN STANDARDS. This document was prepared by:

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes, Platinum 2000 Correlated to Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards (Grade 10)

Disciplinary Literacy in Science

The College Board Redesigned SAT Grade 12

Literature and the Language Arts Experiencing Literature

English IV Version: Beta

Facing our Fears: Reading and Writing about Characters in Literary Text

Pearson Longman Keystone Book D 2013

Language Arts: ( ) Instructional Syllabus. Teachers: T. Beard address

Reading Grammar Section and Lesson Writing Chapter and Lesson Identify a purpose for reading W1-LO; W2- LO; W3- LO; W4- LO; W5-

WebQuest - Student Web Page

Teaching Literacy Through Videos

Create A City: An Urban Planning Exercise Students learn the process of planning a community, while reinforcing their writing and speaking skills.

ELA Grade 4 Literary Heroes Technology Integration Unit

Pearson Longman Keystone Book F 2013

South Carolina English Language Arts

Rubric for Scoring English 1 Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis

Chemistry Senior Seminar - Spring 2016

EQuIP Review Feedback

TRAITS OF GOOD WRITING

FOR TEACHERS ONLY. The University of the State of New York REGENTS HIGH SCHOOL EXAMINATION. ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS (Common Core)

Grade 5: Curriculum Map

Ruggiero, V. R. (2015). The art of thinking: A guide to critical and creative thought (11th ed.). New York, NY: Longman.

BPS Information and Digital Literacy Goals

CAAP. Content Analysis Report. Sample College. Institution Code: 9011 Institution Type: 4-Year Subgroup: none Test Date: Spring 2011

Integrating Common Core Standards and CASAS Content Standards: Improving Instruction and Adult Learner Outcomes

Oakland Unified School District English/ Language Arts Course Syllabus

Fears and Phobias Unit Plan

TU-E2090 Research Assignment in Operations Management and Services

Understanding Language

Greeley/Evans School District 6

GTPS Curriculum English Language Arts-Grade 7

Grade 7. Prentice Hall. Literature, The Penguin Edition, Grade Oregon English/Language Arts Grade-Level Standards. Grade 7

Myths, Legends, Fairytales and Novels (Writing a Letter)

Night by Elie Wiesel. Standards Link:

Common Core Curriculum- Draft

Grade 6: Module 4: Unit 3: Overview

correlated to the Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards Grades 9-12

Writing for the AP U.S. History Exam

2006 Mississippi Language Arts Framework-Revised Grade 12

Writing an Effective Research Proposal

Florida Mathematics Standards for Geometry Honors (CPalms # )

Common Core Exemplar for English Language Arts and Social Studies: GRADE 1

CDE: 1st Grade Reading, Writing, and Communicating Page 2 of 27

California Department of Education English Language Development Standards for Grade 8

Welcome to WRT 104 Writing to Inform and Explain Tues 11:00 12:15 and ONLINE Swan 305

ELA/Literacy Shifts Flip

Parent Academy. Common Core & PARCC

5 th Grade Language Arts Curriculum Map

Dickinson ISD ELAR Year at a Glance 3rd Grade- 1st Nine Weeks

Information Literacy Competency Standards for Higher Education

My Identity, Your Identity: Historical Landmarks/Famous Places

New York State P-12 Common Core Learning Standards For English Language Arts & Literacy

Teachers Guide Chair Study

success. It will place emphasis on:

Georgia Department of Education Dr. John D. Barge, State School Superintendent May 3, 2012 * Page 1 All Rights Reserved

5.1 Sound & Light Unit Overview

Update on Standards and Educator Evaluation

University of Groningen. Systemen, planning, netwerken Bosman, Aart

Content Language Objectives (CLOs) August 2012, H. Butts & G. De Anda

Grade 6: Module 2A Unit 2: Overview

Dublin City Schools Broadcast Video I Graded Course of Study GRADES 9-12

Grade 5: Module 3A: Overview

Lab Reports for Biology

Grade 12 English 4 - Intensive Reading - Collection 2 Gender Roles

RESPONSE TO LITERATURE

I N T E R P R E T H O G A N D E V E L O P HOGAN BUSINESS REASONING INVENTORY. Report for: Martina Mustermann ID: HC Date: May 02, 2017

Biome I Can Statements

What is PDE? Research Report. Paul Nichols

Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium: Brief Write Rubrics. October 2015

Scoring Notes for Secondary Social Studies CBAs (Grades 6 12)

The Political Engagement Activity Student Guide

Honors 7 th Grade Language Arts Curriculum

Extending Place Value with Whole Numbers to 1,000,000

learning collegiate assessment]

Transcription:

+ Next Generation Science Standards and the Common Core Susan Pimentel

+ Why include literacy for science in 2 the Common Core? To encourage (ensure) science study in the early grades. To ensure students are taught how to handle science texts so by high school they are able to access science information through texts (many high school teachers report they avoid texts in class) To ensure students can handle science texts so they don t face limitations upon graduation (< 50% of students can handle reading assignments in freshmen courses). To prepare students for citizenship (in addition to college and careers). NGSS effort was not yet underway!

+ Key Principle 3 The Common Core s literacy for science standards are meant to support not supplant a state s science standards they are meant to buttress the teaching and learning of science content.

+ Who is responsible for what? 4 K-5 teachers are responsible for applying the ELA/literacy Common Core standards when studying literature, history/social studies, science, and the like. In grades 6-12, there are three sets of Common Core standards: ELA teachers are responsible for the ELA standards Science teachers are responsible for the literacy standards for science (in conjunction w/state science content standards) History/social studies teachers are responsible for the literacy standards for history/social studies (in conjunction w/state history/social studies content standards)

+ Literacy for Science (Shanahans) 5 As the CCSS affirms, reading in science requires an appreciation of the norms and conventions of the discipline of science, including the nature of evidence and attention to precision and detail in what is often technical, abstract, dense, and tightly knit language the gathering, synthesis (and corroboration) of complex information the capacity to make and assess intricate arguments the ability to follow detailed procedures and make accounts of events and concepts the close connections among prose, graphs, charts, formulas Likewise, writing and presenting information orally are key means for students to assert and defend claims in science, demonstrate what they know about a concept, and convey what they have experienced, imagined, thought, and learned.

+ Using Textual Evidence and 6 Attending to Detail (Science & Engineering Practice 6: Constructing Explanations and Designing Solutions) Grades 6-8: Cite specific textual evidence to support analysis of science and technical texts. Grades 9-10: Cite specific textual evidence to support analysis of science and technical texts, attending to the precise details of explanations or descriptions. Grades 11-12: Cite specific textual evidence to support analysis of science and technical texts, attending to important distinctions the author makes and to any gaps or inconsistencies in the account.

+ Gathering Relevant Evidence (Science & Engineering Practice 8: Obtaining, Evaluating, and Communicating Information) 7 Grades 6 8: Gather relevant information from multiple print and digital sources, using search terms effectively; assess the credibility and accuracy of each source; and quote or paraphrase the data and conclusions of others while avoiding plagiarism and following a standard format for citation. Grades 9 10: Gather relevant information from multiple authoritative print and digital sources, using advanced searches effectively; assess the usefulness of each source in answering the research question; integrate information into the text selectively to maintain the flow of ideas, avoiding plagiarism and following a standard format for citation. Grades 11 12: Gather relevant information from multiple authoritative print and digital sources, using advanced searches effectively; assess the strengths and limitations of each source in terms of the specific task, purpose, and audience; integrate information into the text selectively to maintain the flow of ideas, avoiding plagiarism and overreliance on any one source and following a standard format for citation.

+ Synthesizing Complex Information (Science & Engineering Practice 6: Constructing Explanations and Designing Solutions) 8 Grades 6 8: Compare and contrast the information gained from experiments, simulations, video, or multimedia sources with that gained from reading a text on the same topic. Grades 9 10: Compare and contrast findings presented in a text to those from other sources (including their own experiments), noting when the findings support or contradict previous explanations or accounts. Grades 11 12: Synthesize information from a range of sources (e.g., texts, experiments, simulations) into a coherent understanding of a process, phenomenon, or concept resolving conflicting information when possible.

+ Making Arguments (Science & Engineering 9 Practice 7: Engaging in Argument from Evidence) Grades 6 8: Support claim(s) with logical reasoning and relevant, accurate data and evidence that demonstrate an understanding of the topic or text, using credible sources. Grades 9 10: Develop claim(s) and counterclaims fairly, supplying data and evidence for each while pointing out the strengths and limitations of both claim(s) and counterclaims in a disciplineappropriate form and in a manner that anticipates the audience s knowledge level and concerns. Grades 11 12: Develop claim(s) and counterclaims fairly and thoroughly, supplying the most relevant data and evidence for each while pointing out the strengths and limitations of both claim(s) and counterclaims in a discipline-appropriate form that anticipates the audience s knowledge level, concerns, values, and possible biases.

+ Assessing Arguments (Science & Engineering Practice 7: Engaging in Argument from Evidence) 10 Grades 6 8: Distinguish among facts, reasoned judgment based on research findings, and speculation in a text. Grades 9 10: Assess the extent to which the reasoning and evidence in a text support the author s claim or a recommendation for solving a scientific or technical problem. Grades 11 12: Evaluate the hypotheses, data, analysis, and conclusions in a science or technical text, verifying the data when possible and corroborating or challenging conclusions with other sources of information.

+ Following Complex Processes & 11 Procedures (Science & Engineering Practice 3: Planning and Carrying Out Investigations) Grades 6 8: Follow precisely a multistep procedure when carrying out experiments, taking measurements, or performing technical tasks. Grades 9 10: Follow precisely a complex multistep procedure when carrying out experiments, taking measurements, or performing technical tasks, attending to special cases or exceptions defined in the text. Grades 11 12: Follow precisely a complex multistep procedure when carrying out experiments, taking measurements, or performing technical tasks; analyze the specific results based on explanations in the text.

+ Conducting Research (Science & Engineering Practice 3: Planning and Carrying Out Investigations) 12 Grades 6 8: Conduct short research projects to answer a question (including a self-generated question), drawing on several sources and generating additional related, focused questions that allow for multiple avenues of exploration. Grades 9 10: Conduct short as well as more sustained research projects to answer a question (including a self-generated question) or solve a problem; narrow or broaden the inquiry when appropriate; synthesize multiple sources on the subject, demonstrating understanding of the subject under investigation. Grades 11 12: Conduct short as well as more sustained research projects to answer a question (including a self-generated question) or solve a problem; narrow or broaden the inquiry when appropriate; synthesize multiple sources on the subject, demonstrating understanding of the subject under investigation.

+ Translating Information from One 13 Form to Another (Science & Engineering Practice 8: Obtaining, Evaluating, and Communicating Information) Grades 6 8: Integrate quantitative or technical information expressed in words in a text with a version of that information expressed visually (e.g., in a flowchart, diagram, model, graph, or table). Grades 9 10: Translate quantitative or technical information expressed in words in a text into visual form (e.g., a table or chart) and translate information expressed visually or mathematically (e.g., in an equation) into words. Grades 11 12: Integrate and evaluate multiple sources of information presented in diverse formats and media (e.g., quantitative data, video, multimedia) in order to address a question or solve a problem.

+ Explaining concepts, processes and 14 procedures (Science & Engineering Practice 6: Constructing Explanations and Designing Solutions) Grades 6 8: Write informative/explanatory texts, including the narration of scientific procedures/experiments or technical processes... Develop the topic with relevant, well-chosen facts, definitions, concrete details, quotations, or other information and examples. Grades 9 10: Write informative/explanatory texts, including the narration of scientific procedures/experiments or technical processes... Develop the topic with well-chosen, relevant, and sufficient facts, extended definitions, concrete details, quotations, or other information and examples appropriate to the audience s knowledge of the topic. Grades 11 12: Write informative/explanatory texts, including the narration of scientific procedures/experiments or technical processes... Develop the topic thoroughly by selecting the most significant and relevant facts, extended definitions, concrete details, quotations, or other information and examples appropriate to the audience s knowledge of the topic.

+ Key Principle 15 The Common Core s literacy for science standards are meant to support not supplant the NGSS Science and Engineering Practices they are meant to buttress the teaching and learning of science content.