MEI STRUCTURED MATHEMATICS 4771

Similar documents
GCSE Mathematics B (Linear) Mark Scheme for November Component J567/04: Mathematics Paper 4 (Higher) General Certificate of Secondary Education

Mathematics Scoring Guide for Sample Test 2005

Tuesday 13 May 2014 Afternoon

GCSE. Mathematics A. Mark Scheme for January General Certificate of Secondary Education Unit A503/01: Mathematics C (Foundation Tier)

Digital Fabrication and Aunt Sarah: Enabling Quadratic Explorations via Technology. Michael L. Connell University of Houston - Downtown

2 nd grade Task 5 Half and Half

Edexcel GCSE. Statistics 1389 Paper 1H. June Mark Scheme. Statistics Edexcel GCSE

Guide to the Uniform mark scale (UMS) Uniform marks in A-level and GCSE exams

Extending Place Value with Whole Numbers to 1,000,000

Interpreting ACER Test Results

Mathematics process categories

INTERMEDIATE ALGEBRA PRODUCT GUIDE

Julia Smith. Effective Classroom Approaches to.

Average Number of Letters

PHYSICS 40S - COURSE OUTLINE AND REQUIREMENTS Welcome to Physics 40S for !! Mr. Bryan Doiron

OPTIMIZATINON OF TRAINING SETS FOR HEBBIAN-LEARNING- BASED CLASSIFIERS

Functional Skills Mathematics Level 2 assessment

Major Milestones, Team Activities, and Individual Deliverables

Activity 2 Multiplying Fractions Math 33. Is it important to have common denominators when we multiply fraction? Why or why not?

ACCOMMODATIONS FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES

University of Groningen. Systemen, planning, netwerken Bosman, Aart

Multimedia Application Effective Support of Education

Cal s Dinner Card Deals

Exemplar 6 th Grade Math Unit: Prime Factorization, Greatest Common Factor, and Least Common Multiple

Foothill College Summer 2016

PERFORMING ARTS. Unit 2 Proposal for a commissioning brief Suite. Cambridge TECHNICALS LEVEL 3. L/507/6467 Guided learning hours: 60

Think A F R I C A when assessing speaking. C.E.F.R. Oral Assessment Criteria. Think A F R I C A - 1 -

The lab is designed to remind you how to work with scientific data (including dealing with uncertainty) and to review experimental design.

GCE. Mathematics (MEI) Mark Scheme for June Advanced Subsidiary GCE Unit 4766: Statistics 1. Oxford Cambridge and RSA Examinations

Radius STEM Readiness TM

Generating Test Cases From Use Cases

Redeployment Arrangements at Primary Level for Surplus Permanent & CID Holding Teachers

Math 96: Intermediate Algebra in Context

Math Grade 3 Assessment Anchors and Eligible Content

Physics 270: Experimental Physics

Characteristics of Functions

Statewide Framework Document for:

Ohio s Learning Standards-Clear Learning Targets

Analysis of Enzyme Kinetic Data

Unit 7 Data analysis and design

FIGURE IT OUT! MIDDLE SCHOOL TASKS. Texas Performance Standards Project

AGS THE GREAT REVIEW GAME FOR PRE-ALGEBRA (CD) CORRELATED TO CALIFORNIA CONTENT STANDARDS

GACE Computer Science Assessment Test at a Glance

Functional Skills. Maths. OCR Report to Centres Level 1 Maths Oxford Cambridge and RSA Examinations

AN EXAMPLE OF THE GOMORY CUTTING PLANE ALGORITHM. max z = 3x 1 + 4x 2. 3x 1 x x x x N 2

Graduation Initiative 2025 Goals San Jose State

Mathematics Success Level E

Given a directed graph G =(N A), where N is a set of m nodes and A. destination node, implying a direction for ow to follow. Arcs have limitations

Statistical Analysis of Climate Change, Renewable Energies, and Sustainability An Independent Investigation for Introduction to Statistics

English Language Arts Summative Assessment

Firms and Markets Saturdays Summer I 2014

LEARNING AGREEMENT FOR STUDIES

Diploma in Library and Information Science (Part-Time) - SH220

Holy Family Catholic Primary School SPELLING POLICY

Measurement. When Smaller Is Better. Activity:

Creating a Test in Eduphoria! Aware

Visit us at:

Many instructors use a weighted total to calculate their grades. This lesson explains how to set up a weighted total using categories.

MADERA SCIENCE FAIR 2013 Grades 4 th 6 th Project due date: Tuesday, April 9, 8:15 am Parent Night: Tuesday, April 16, 6:00 8:00 pm

Introduction to Simulation

Office of Planning and Budgets. Provost Market for Fiscal Year Resource Guide

Department of Statistics. STAT399 Statistical Consulting. Semester 2, Unit Outline. Unit Convener: Dr Ayse Bilgin

K 1 2 K 1 2. Iron Mountain Public Schools Standards (modified METS) Checklist by Grade Level Page 1 of 11

How to Judge the Quality of an Objective Classroom Test

DIBELS Next BENCHMARK ASSESSMENTS

Investigating Ahuja-Orlin s Large Neighbourhood Search Approach for Examination Timetabling

Algebra 1, Quarter 3, Unit 3.1. Line of Best Fit. Overview

ECE-492 SENIOR ADVANCED DESIGN PROJECT

Mathematics subject curriculum

M55205-Mastering Microsoft Project 2016

Reinforcement Learning by Comparing Immediate Reward

MULTIPLE CHOICE. Choose the one alternative that best completes the statement or answers the question.

TOPIC VN7 PAINTING AND DECORATING

Green Belt Curriculum (This workshop can also be conducted on-site, subject to price change and number of participants)

South Carolina College- and Career-Ready Standards for Mathematics. Standards Unpacking Documents Grade 5

Study Group Handbook

MATH 205: Mathematics for K 8 Teachers: Number and Operations Western Kentucky University Spring 2017

Reducing Abstraction When Learning Graph Theory

Pre-AP Geometry Course Syllabus Page 1

South Carolina English Language Arts

PowerCampus Self-Service Student Guide. Release 8.4

Measures of the Location of the Data

Mathematics Assessment Plan

Functional Skills Mathematics Level 2 sample assessment

A GENERIC SPLIT PROCESS MODEL FOR ASSET MANAGEMENT DECISION-MAKING

Science Fair Project Handbook

I N T E R P R E T H O G A N D E V E L O P HOGAN BUSINESS REASONING INVENTORY. Report for: Martina Mustermann ID: HC Date: May 02, 2017

Diagnostic Test. Middle School Mathematics

Schoology Getting Started Guide for Teachers

Decision Analysis. Decision-Making Problem. Decision Analysis. Part 1 Decision Analysis and Decision Tables. Decision Analysis, Part 1

CS 1103 Computer Science I Honors. Fall Instructor Muller. Syllabus

Office Hours: Mon & Fri 10:00-12:00. Course Description

Mining Association Rules in Student s Assessment Data

Maximizing Learning Through Course Alignment and Experience with Different Types of Knowledge

IV. Other children (including late applicants) who achieve the automatic qualifying score or above.

Curriculum Design Project with Virtual Manipulatives. Gwenanne Salkind. George Mason University EDCI 856. Dr. Patricia Moyer-Packenham

Software Maintenance

Paper 2. Mathematics test. Calculator allowed. First name. Last name. School KEY STAGE TIER

Math 121 Fundamentals of Mathematics I

Transcription:

OXFORD CAMBRIDGE AND RSA EXAMINATIONS Advanced Subsidiary General Certificate of Education Advanced General Certificate of Education MEI STRUCTURED MATHEMATICS 477 Decision Mathematics Thursday 5 JUNE 2006 Afternoon hour 30 minutes Additional materials: 8 page answer booklet Graph paper MEI Examination Formulae and Tables (MF2) TIME hour 30 minutes INSTRUCTIONS TO CANDIDATES Write your name, centre number and candidate number in the spaces provided on the answer booklet. Answer all the questions. There is an insert for use in Questions and 6. You are permitted to use a graphical calculator in this paper. Final answers should be given to a degree of accuracy appropriate to the context. INFORMATION FOR CANDIDATES The number of marks is given in brackets [ ] at the end of each question or part question. You are advised that an answer may receive no marks unless you show sufficient detail of the working to indicate that a correct method is being used. The total number of marks for this paper is 72. This question paper consists of 7 printed pages, blank page and an insert. HN/4 OCR 2005 [K/02/265] Registered Charity 066969 [Turn over

2 Section A (24 marks) Answer this question on the insert provided. A 5 B 2 2 3 7 F 2 G C 8 3 6 6 E Fig. D (i) Apply Dijkstra s algorithm to the copy of Fig. in the insert to find the least weight route from A to D. Give your route and its weight. [6] (ii) Arc DE is now deleted. Write down the weight of the new least weight route from A to D, and explain how your working in part (i) shows that it is the least weight. [2] 477 June 2006

3 2 Fig. 2. represents the two floors of a house. There are 5 rooms shown, plus a hall and a landing, which are to be regarded as separate rooms. Each represents an internal doorway connecting two rooms. The ƒ represents the staircase, connecting the hall and the landing. Fig. 2. (i) Draw a graph representing this information, with vertices representing rooms, and arcs representing internal connections (doorways and the stairs). What is the name of the type of graph of which this is an example? [3] (ii) A larger house has 2 rooms on two floors, plus a hall and a landing. Each ground floor room has a single door, which leads to the hall. Each first floor room has a single door, which leads to the landing. There is a single staircase connecting the hall and the landing. How many arcs are there in the graph of this house? [] (iii) Another house has 2 rooms on three floors, plus a hall, a first floor landing and a second floor landing. Again, each room has a single door on to the hall or a landing. There is one staircase from the hall to the first floor landing, and another staircase joining the two landings. How many arcs are there in the graph of this house? [] (iv) Fig. 2.2 shows the graph of another two-floor house. It has 8 rooms plus a hall and a landing. There is a single staircase. Fig. 2.2 Draw a possible floor plan, showing internal connections. [3] 477 June 2006 [Turn over

3 An incomplete algorithm is specified in Fig. 3. 4 f(x) x 2 2 Initial values: L 0, R 2. Step Compute M L R. 2 Step 2 Compute f(m). Step 3 If f(m) 0 change the value of L to that of M. Otherwise change the value of R to that of M. Step 4 Go to Step. Fig. 3 (i) Apply two iterations of the algorithm. [6] (ii) After 0 iterations L.44063, R.4606, M.4606 and f(m) 0.00500. Say what the algorithm achieves. [] (iii) Say what is needed to complete the algorithm. [] 477 June 2006

5 Section B (48 marks) 4 Table 4. shows some of the activities involved in preparing for a meeting. Activity Duration (hours) Immediate predecessors A Agree date B Construct agenda 0.5 C Book venue 0.25 A D Order refreshments 0.25 C E Inform participants 0.5 B, C Table 4. (i) Draw an activity-on-arc network to represent the precedences. [4] (ii) Find the early event time and the late event time for each vertex of your network, and list the critical activities. [3] (iii) Assuming that each activity requires one person and that each activity starts at its earliest start time, draw a resource histogram. [2] (iv) In fact although activity A has duration hour, it actually involves only 0.5 hours work, since 0.5 hours involves waiting for replies. Given this information, and the fact that there is only one person available to do the work, what is the shortest time needed to prepare for the meeting? [2] Fig. 4.2 shows an activity network for the tasks which have to be completed after the meeting. P 5 T Dummy Q 3 S 6 V 7 R Dummy Dummy W 2 U 4 P: Clean room Q: Prepare draft minutes R: Allocate action tasks S: Circulate draft minutes T: Approve task allocations U: Obtain budgets for tasks V: Post minutes W: Pay refreshments bill Fig. 4.2 (v) Draw a precedence table for these activities. [5] 477 June 2006 [Turn over

6 5 John is reviewing his lifestyle, and in particular his leisure commitments. He enjoys badminton and squash, but is not sure whether he should persist with one or both. Both cost money and both take time. Playing badminton costs 3 per hour and playing squash costs 4 per hour. John has per week to spend on these activities. John takes 0.5 hours to recover from every hour of badminton and 0.75 hours to recover from every hour of squash. He has 5 hours in total available per week to play and recover. (i) Define appropriate variables and formulate two inequalities to model John s constraints. [3] (ii) Draw a graph to represent your inequalities. Give the coordinates of the vertices of your feasible region. [6] (iii) John is not sure how to define an objective function for his problem, but he says that he likes squash twice as much as badminton. Letting every hour of badminton be worth one satisfaction point define an objective function for John s problem, taking into account his twice as much statement. [] (iv) Solve the resulting LP problem. [2] (v) Given that badminton and squash courts are charged by the hour, explain why the solution to the LP is not a feasible solution to John s practical problem. Give the best feasible solution. [2] (vi) If instead John had said that he liked badminton more than squash, what would have been his best feasible solution? [2] 477 June 2006

6 Answer parts (ii)(a) and (iii)(b) of this question on the insert provided. 7 A particular component of a machine sometimes fails. The probability of failure depends on the age of the component, as shown in Table 6. Year of life first second third fourth fifth sixth Probability of failure during year, given no earlier failure 0.0 0.05 0.02 0.20 0.20 0.30 Table 6 You are to simulate six years of machine operation to estimate the probability of the component failing during that time. This will involve you using six 2-digit random numbers, one for each year. (i) Give a rule for using a 2-digit random number to simulate failure of the component in its first year of life. Similarly give rules for simulating failure during each of years 2 to 6. [3] (ii) (A) Use your rules, together with the random numbers given in the insert, to complete the simulation table in the insert. This simulates 0 repetitions of six years operation of the machine. Start in the first column working down cell-by-cell. In each cell enter a tick if there is no simulated failure and a cross if there is a simulated failure. Stop and move on to the next column if a failure occurs. [5] (B) Use your results to estimate the probability of a failure occurring. [] It is suggested that any component that has not failed during the first three years of its life should automatically be replaced. (iii) (A) Describe how to simulate the operation of this policy. [2] (B) Use the table in the insert to simulate 0 repetitions of the application of this policy. Re-use the same random numbers that are given in the insert. [3] (C) Use your results to estimate the probability of a failure occurring. [] (iv) How might the reliability of your estimates in parts (ii) and (iii) be improved? [] 477 June 2006

Candidate Candidate Name Centre Number Number OXFORD CAMBRIDGE AND RSA EXAMINATIONS Advanced Subsidiary General Certificate of Education Advanced General Certificate of Education MEI STRUCTURED MATHEMATICS 477 Decision Mathematics INSERT Thursday 5 JUNE 2006 Afternoon hour 30 minutes INSTRUCTIONS TO CANDIDATES This insert should be used in Questions and 6. Write your name, centre number and candidate number in the spaces provided at the top of this page and attach it to your answer booklet. This insert consists of 4 printed pages. HN/3 OCR 2006 [K/02/265] Registered Charity 066969 [Turn over

2 (i) key: order of labelling label working values A 5 B 2 2 3 7 F 2 G C 8 3 6 6 E D Least weight route: Weight (ii) - 477 Insert June 2006

3 6 (ii) (A) and (iii)(b) Random numbers Run Run 2 Run 3 Run 4 Run 5 Run 6 Run 7 Run 8 Run 9 Run 0 60 6 59 00 77 46 02 77 59 95 4 89 82 25 9 43 62 08 3 9 5 76 22 65 8 06 86 69 84 25 8 32 3 5 7 57 20 08 23 06 65 23 37 25 69 97 82 52 60 82 32 03 45 22 50 87 72 08 84 (ii) (A) Year Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Run Run 2 Run 3 Run 4 Run 5 Run 6 Run 7 Run 8 Run 9 Run 0 [Question 6 (iii)(b) is printed overleaf.] - 477 Insert June 2006

4 Random numbers Run Run 2 Run 3 Run 4 Run 5 Run 6 Run 7 Run 8 Run 9 Run 0 60 6 59 00 77 46 02 77 59 95 4 89 82 25 9 43 62 08 3 9 5 76 22 65 8 06 86 69 84 25 8 32 3 5 7 57 20 08 23 06 65 23 37 25 69 97 82 52 60 82 32 03 45 22 50 87 72 08 84 (iii) (B) Year Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 Run Run 2 Run 3 Run 4 Run 5 Run 6 Run 7 Run 8 Run 9 Run 0-477 Insert June 2006

Mark Scheme 477 June 2006

477 Mark Scheme June 2006 (i) 0 3 3 A 5 B 5 3 2 2 2 F 2 7 G 2 8 3 3 5 6 7 6 6 2 6 4 5 5 C M sca Dijkstra A labels A order of labelling A working values 6 9 2 0 E D 7 0 0 Least weight route: A F B G E D Weight = 0 (ii) From working value. Can't be bettered since new least weight must be bigger than 0. 2. (i) e.g. M A a tree (ii) 3 (iii) 4 (iv) e.g. M A A

477 Mark Scheme June 2006 3. (i) M = f(m) = L = M =.5 f(m) = 0.25 R =.5 (ii) Solves equations (Allow "Finds root 2".) (iii) A termination condition 4. (i) & (ii) 0 0 A B 0.5 C 0.25.25.25.25.25 D 0.25 E 0.5.75.75 M sca activity-on-arc A A, B, C A D A E forward pass (.25 at end of B/dummy) backward pass (.25 at start of dummy/d) Critical activities: A, C, E (iii) people B A 0.5 A (iv) 2 hours (resource smoothing on A/B, but extra time needed for D/E). (v) P Q R S Q, R T Q, R U R V S, T, U W U C D E E hours M A M A

477 Mark Scheme June 2006 5. (i) Let x be the number of hours spent at badminton Let y be the number of hours spent at squash 3x + 4y.5x +.75y 5 (ii) y 20/7 /4 (, 2) axes labelled and scaled line line shading 0/3 /3 x intercepts (, 2) (iii) x + 2y (iv) 22/4 > 5 > 0/3, so 5.5 at (0, /4) M A (v) Squash courts sold in whole hours hour badminton and 2 hours squash per week (vi) 3 hours of badminton and no squash

477 Mark Scheme June 2006 6. (i) year : 00 09 failure, otherwise no failure year 2: 00 04 year 3: 00 0 year 4: 00 9 year 5: 00 9 year 6: 00 29 M A A (ii)(a) year year 2 year 3 year 4 (B) 0.6 Run Run Run Run Run Run Run Run Run Run 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 x x x x M ticks and crosses A run A runs 2 4 A runs 5 7 runs 8 0 (iii) (A) if no failure then continue after year 3 but using rules for yrs to 3 (B) year year 2 year 3 year 4 (C) 0.3 Run Run Run Run Run Run Run Run Run Run 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 x x x M A runs 5 A runs 6 0 (iv) more repetitions

D June 06 6(ii) (A) Run Run 2 Run 3 Run 4 Run 5 Run 6 Run 7 Run 8 Run 9 Run 0 Year Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6 6(iii) (B) Run Run 2 Run 3 Run 4 Run 5 Run 6 Run 7 Run 8 Run 9 Run 0 Year Year 2 Year 3 Year 4 Year 5 Year 6

Report on the Units taken in June 2006 General Comments 477 - Decision Mathematics Performances on parts of this paper were disappointing. In particular many candidates were unable successfully to execute the algorithm in question 3 and many were unable to deal with the simulation in question 6. Conversely the graph question (question 2) and the CPA question (question 4) were both done well. Comments on Individual Questions Q Q 2 Q 3 Networks (i) A straightforward application of Dijkstra. As always there were some candidates, rather too many on this presentation, who either did not know the algorithm or could not convince the examiners that they knew it. (ii) The instruction " explain how your working " caused difficulties. All that was required was a reference to working values, or to shortest paths to neighbouring vertices. Graphs Candidates scored well on this question. It was pleasing to see this modelling dealt with so successfully. Algorithms This was very badly done. (i) At step most candidates correctly computed (ii) (iii) ( 0+2) M = 2 =. At step 2 most correctly had f( M ) = 2 2=. At step 3 the vast majority incorrectly put L equal to (i.e. f(m)) instead of the correct value of (i.e. M). It is difficult to see why this should have been the case, and it was costly. Many candidates seemed to think that an adequate objective for the algorithm was "to make L equal to R". Some others, who had much more idea, thought that it was finding the square root of R. All that was required was the observation that the algorithm was missing a stopping condition candidates did not need to provide such a condition. Q 4 CPA (i) & (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) These parts were well done. Again, it was pleasing to see an aspect of modelling being tackled so well. Not many candidates knew what a resource histogram is. The question was constructed so that candidates would be able to use their answer to part (iii) to help them in part (iv). Some were able to argue through to the correct answer having not succeeded with part (iii). Many candidates gratefully accepted the 5 marks which were on offer here. Q 5 LP (i) (ii) (iii) How do we persuade candidates to define their variables properly? It was anticipated that the time constraint would create problems for some candidates, and indeed many gave 0.5b+0.75s<5 instead of.5b+.75s<5. Some very tiny graphs were seen. Many candidates either overlooked or ignored the instruction to give the coordinates of their feasible region. This revealed modelling weaknesses. Many gave "b=2s" or equivalent. 47

Report on the Units taken in June 2006 (iv) Too many candidates did not show how they were solving the LP. The instruction in part (ii), that they give the coordinates of their feasible region, was intended to help with this. (v)&(vi) Many candidates showed weaknesses in interpretation in these parts. Good candidates answered them quickly and efficiently. Q 6 Simulation (i) The vast majority of candidates clearly did not read the question. They saw a set of probabilities and set off in a knee-jerk routine, simulating a supposed probability distribution with 6 outcomes, despite the fact that the probabilities did not add up to, and despite the fact that nothing much made sense thereafter. (ii) It might have been thought that the provided tables would have helped candidates to understand this question, but that seemed not to be the case. This is well illustrated by the number of candidates who filled every cell with either a tick or a cross, and then gave an "out of 60" probability. (iii) Very few candidates were able, in their comments, to distinguish between "reality" and the simulation model. Most comments parroted the question in referring to replacing the component, rather than to continuing the simulation. (iv) A substantial minority of candidates thought that the reliability could be improved by using 3-digit random numbers. 48