Note: Trainer notes are included in this section and are also provided in the Trainer Notes handout.

Similar documents
Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Mapping the Assets of Your Community:

Making the ELPS-TELPAS Connection Grades K 12 Overview

EQuIP Review Feedback

Copyright Corwin 2015

Learning Lesson Study Course

Integrating Blended Learning into the Classroom

PEDAGOGICAL LEARNING WALKS: MAKING THE THEORY; PRACTICE

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Arkansas Tech University Secondary Education Exit Portfolio

Assessment System for M.S. in Health Professions Education (rev. 4/2011)

Indiana Collaborative for Project Based Learning. PBL Certification Process

Final Teach For America Interim Certification Program

Language and Literacy: Exploring Examples of the Language and Literacy Foundations

Introduction to the Revised Mathematics TEKS (2012) Module 1

The ELA/ELD Framework Companion: a guide to assist in navigating the Framework

PREP S SPEAKER LISTENER TECHNIQUE COACHING MANUAL

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

SELF: CONNECTING CAREERS TO PERSONAL INTERESTS. Essential Question: How Can I Connect My Interests to M y Work?

Market Economy Lesson Plan

Further, Robert W. Lissitz, University of Maryland Huynh Huynh, University of South Carolina ADEQUATE YEARLY PROGRESS

Module 9: Performing HIV Rapid Tests (Demo and Practice)

TASK 2: INSTRUCTION COMMENTARY

Kelso School District and Kelso Education Association Teacher Evaluation Process (TPEP)

Bell Work Integrating ELLs

Grade 2: Using a Number Line to Order and Compare Numbers Place Value Horizontal Content Strand

Karla Brooks Baehr, Ed.D. Senior Advisor and Consultant The District Management Council

TEKS Resource System. Effective Planning from the IFD & Assessment. Presented by: Kristin Arterbury, ESC Region 12

- SAMPLE ONLY - PLEASE DO NOT COPY

NCSC Alternate Assessments and Instructional Materials Based on Common Core State Standards

The newly revised NCSSFL-ACTFL Can-Do Statements offer language educators a

E-3: Check for academic understanding

Designing a Rubric to Assess the Modelling Phase of Student Design Projects in Upper Year Engineering Courses

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

Rover Races Grades: 3-5 Prep Time: ~45 Minutes Lesson Time: ~105 minutes

St. Martin s Marking and Feedback Policy

Norms How were TerraNova 3 norms derived? Does the norm sample reflect my diverse school population?

Professional Learning Suite Framework Edition Domain 3 Course Index

SMALL GROUPS AND WORK STATIONS By Debbie Hunsaker 1

TEACHING QUALITY: SKILLS. Directive Teaching Quality Standard Applicable to the Provision of Basic Education in Alberta

EVERYTHING DiSC WORKPLACE LEADER S GUIDE

Sample Performance Assessment

Selling Skills. Tailored to Your Needs. Consultants & trainers in sales, presentations, negotiations and influence

SSIS SEL Edition Overview Fall 2017

Custom Program Title. Leader s Guide. Understanding Other Styles. Discovering Your DiSC Style. Building More Effective Relationships

The Oregon Literacy Framework of September 2009 as it Applies to grades K-3

Evidence-based Practice: A Workshop for Training Adult Basic Education, TANF and One Stop Practitioners and Program Administrators

School Leadership Rubrics

leading people through change

Critical Decisions within Student Learning Objectives: Target Setting Model

Lecturing Module

Facing our Fears: Reading and Writing about Characters in Literary Text

Analyzing Linguistically Appropriate IEP Goals in Dual Language Programs

NC Global-Ready Schools

PROFESSIONAL PATHWAYS. for TEACHERS. PPf T SUPPORT GUIDE

PROFESSIONAL PATHWAYS. for TEACHERS. PPf T SUPPORT GUIDE

EDIT 576 (2 credits) Mobile Learning and Applications Fall Semester 2015 August 31 October 18, 2015 Fully Online Course

Characteristics of Collaborative Network Models. ed. by Line Gry Knudsen

Secondary English-Language Arts

Florida Reading Endorsement Alignment Matrix Competency 1

Marketing Management

Teachers Guide Chair Study

5th Grade Unit Plan Social Studies Comparing the Colonies. Created by: Kylie Daniels

Leader s Guide: Dream Big and Plan for Success

EDIT 576 DL1 (2 credits) Mobile Learning and Applications Fall Semester 2014 August 25 October 12, 2014 Fully Online Course

End-of-Module Assessment Task K 2

The Site Visit: How to Prepare for It & What to Expect. STARTALK Conference Atlanta, GA May 3, 2012

Me on the Map. Standards: Objectives: Learning Activities:

Backstage preparation Igniting passion Awareness of learning Directing & planning Reflection on learning

Psychology 101(3cr): Introduction to Psychology (Summer 2016) Monday - Thursday 4:00-5:50pm - Gruening 413

New Jersey Department of Education World Languages Model Program Application Guidance Document

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS GUIDELINES

VIEW: An Assessment of Problem Solving Style

Instructional Approach(s): The teacher should introduce the essential question and the standard that aligns to the essential question

Program Alignment CARF Child and Youth Services Standards. Nonviolent Crisis Intervention Training Program

GACE Computer Science Assessment Test at a Glance

White Paper. The Art of Learning

BSP !!! Trainer s Manual. Sheldon Loman, Ph.D. Portland State University. M. Kathleen Strickland-Cohen, Ph.D. University of Oregon

Section 1: Program Design and Curriculum Planning

Queensborough Public Library (Queens, NY) CCSS Guidance for TASC Professional Development Curriculum

E C C. American Heart Association. Basic Life Support Instructor Course. Updated Written Exams. February 2016

Highlighting and Annotation Tips Foundation Lesson

RETURNING TEACHER REQUIRED TRAINING MODULE YE TRANSCRIPT

WHO PASSED? Time Frame 30 minutes. Standard Read with Understanding NRS EFL 3-4

WORK OF LEADERS GROUP REPORT

English Language Arts Summative Assessment

Table of Contents. Introduction Choral Reading How to Use This Book...5. Cloze Activities Correlation to TESOL Standards...

Practitioner s Lexicon What is meant by key terminology.

Word Segmentation of Off-line Handwritten Documents

Activities, Exercises, Assignments Copyright 2009 Cem Kaner 1

MGMT 479 (Hybrid) Strategic Management

STUDENT MOODLE ORIENTATION

Firms and Markets Saturdays Summer I 2014

Course Objectives Upon completion of this course, you will: Have a clear grasp of organic gardening techniques and methods

THE IMPORTANCE OF TEAM PROCESS

I. PREREQUISITE For information regarding prerequisites for this course, please refer to the Academic Course Catalog.

GENERAL COMPETITION INFORMATION

Implementing Response to Intervention (RTI) National Center on Response to Intervention

An Industrial Technologist s Core Knowledge: Web-based Strategy for Defining Our Discipline

g to onsultant t Learners rkshop o W tional C ces.net I Appealin eren Nancy Mikhail esour Educa Diff Curriculum Resources CurriculumR

Transcription:

1

Note: Trainer notes are included in this section and are also provided in the Trainer Notes handout. Welcome. The purpose for us meeting today is to collectively learn about the new Texas Teacher Evaluation and Support System. also known as T TESS. Our time together is intended to ensure that every one of you (teachers) has a clear understanding about the new system, the implications for teacher evaluations, and how it will support all of us in learning and growing as a school community, to ultimately impact our students performance. 2

What were you doing in 1997?? Share what you were doing and ask a few to do the same! Some may have even just been born! 1997 is when Texas enacted the PDAS system we have been using for teacher appraisal YIKES, the world has changed quite a bit since then, is it time for our practices to reflect that! 3

This is not a tweak of the old system it is a totally new way of thinking about the process of teaching and learning and how to continuously improve. As for PDAS terminology, structure, process sing with me LET IT GO! Do you have worries about the new system Again, let s all sing together LET IT GO! 4

While a new teacher evaluation system in Texas may not be the most inspiring change in the education landscape, it does provide a great opportunity to change the way we have been doing appraisal. Building in consistent conversations about teaching and learning we have a huge opportunity to focus on learning and quality practices. Since this change is coming our way, I challenge you to view the evaluation process NOT as a list of check boxes to complete, but an opportunity to refine the work you do everyday to ensure your students have the most valuable learning opportunities possible! 5

6

The goal of the new evaluation system is to formalize a growth mindset into daily practice. We want our students to learn new things all the time and we want the same for our teachers! The way T TESS is structured supports learning and growth for everyone no matter if you are a new or veteran teacher. There are things you do very well already and there is always room for improvement! How can we expect our students to learn and grow if we are not modeling the same in our work? 7

Today is about providing and overview and introduction. All administrators and teachers must go through in depth practice and training to be fluent in all of its applications and uses. This will be the beginning of many conversations and activities we will have to learn more about this new system. We must embrace the fact that we will be public learners with this process. This means that we will spend additional time studying and applying the rubric in structured professional learning forums beyond today s session to ensure that we understand it and are applying it as intended. The campus goal is that we re T TESS experts and are using the tool to learn and grow as an organization Administrators, teachers, students and other stakeholders. 8

Each of these components will be further reviewed in the coming sections. 9

Goal Setting should be based on data and individual need. Everyone is in a different place in their learning and this should be meaningful learning for you in your work. There may be district and/or campus initiatives that will be included but also individual goals based on where you are on the continuum. We will have a goal setting conversation to prepare these together and utilize data and the rubric to craft the goals and the PD plan. 10

The T TESS Rubric includes four broad categories, or Domains, and 16 Dimensions. Read each domain and the bulleted dimensions. 11

T TESS strives to capture the holistic nature of teaching the idea that a constant feedback loop exists between teachers and students, and gauging the effectiveness of teachers requires a consistent focus on how students respond to their teacher s instructional practices. For those reasons, each of the observable domains in T TESS focuses on teachers and students rather than separating them out into separate domains. The appraiser has a vital role in assessing teaching proficiency and ensuring that teachers and administrators derive reliable and meaningful information from the teacher evaluation process. By providing evidence based feedback, appraisers help teachers and administrators make decisions that support efforts to improve instructional quality and student performance. 12

Note: This slide provides an overview of the Rubric s format. Direct teachers to Teacher Handout #1, indicating that they will be seeing the Working version of the rubric which includes the same information as this stylized version. Domain: This section of the rubric is where we see the domain. In this case, it s Instruction Dimension: This section outlines the Dimensions In this case it s Differentiation. Descriptors: These sections provide the descriptors for each performance level of the Differentiation dimension. 13

This slide shows the performance levels Distinguished, Accomplished, Proficient, Developing and Improvement Needed. Very Important...(Make sure teachers understand what is below.) When appraisers use the evidence to score a lesson, they will begin in the proficient column. This performance level Proficient - signifies a Rock Solid teacher. Let me say this again, Proficient is Rock Solid. What does this mean? We will see a bell curve with T-TESS evaluations. This is a culture shift in Texas. If teachers are Proficient and Rock Solid, then we will see a bell curve which indicates there are some that fall in the accomplished and distinguished levels and others that will be developing and improvement needed. This process is not about the person it s about how the lesson scores, using the evidence collected and the rubric descriptors for each dimension. 14

Take another moment to reinforce an old word that is being used in a new way! What was exceeds expectations in PDAS is now described in the proficient level. Two additional performance levels, accomplished and distinguished, were added to allow for growth and aspiration. We live in Proficient and visit Accomplished and Distinguished. Once we dig into the descriptors you will see it is almost impossible to achieve solely accomplished and distinguished. For the next bit we will dig into the rubric and investigate evidence that will be used to determine the performance levels as indicated in the descriptors. 15

Let participants know that this will be the guiding structure for learning throughout the training and that we will be modeling good teaching and practice whenever possible. Point out that the gradual release of responsibility is widely recognized as an important part of effective teaching. You will be modeling effective teaching throughout the training. Participants will notice that the trainer will be gradually releasing responsibility to them. So, each activity will begin with a model by the trainer, followed by a paired or group table activity and then to independence through the you do individual portion. The first step is the I do. You will model for them your thought process while highlighting one standard area on the rubric. 16

Trainer will model how to highlight the Communication dimension and descriptors before participants highlight their rubrics. See Trainer Handout #1. Start with the summary statement at the top of the rubric (The teacher clearly and accurately communicates to support persistence, deeper learning and effective effort.). Share which words you would highlight as key terms in the rubric. Move to the Rock Solid Proficient Column to highlight key words in the first descriptor, since this is where we begin scoring the lesson. Scan and compare the Accomplished and Distinguished descriptors to the left as you think out loud, followed by the Developing and Improvement Needed descriptors to the right, to show how the continuum changes across performance levels for the first descriptor. Move to the Proficient level again with the second descriptor to highlight the key words and think out loud regarding what this descriptor looks like in practice. Review performance levels to the left and right, noting how they change. Follow the same process with the remainder of the rubric, while teachers take notes on their rubric. When finished, indicated that you just modeled the I do. And will now move to the We do 17

Note: See below and in trainer manual. Set the timer in three, five-minute increments to pace the group with each dimension. Teachers will read and highlight the dimension description on the left, move to the proficient column to read and highlight the first descriptor, make notes to define what this descriptor looks and sounds like in practice, then compare that descriptor across performance levels to determine how it changes. They will go back to the proficient column to look at the second descriptor and repeat the process for the entire dimension. We will now move to the We do each table will be assigned three dimensions to highlight the key terms in the dimension (summary paragraph at the top) and the descriptors. Are there questions about the process at this point? To debrief the activity, remind the staff that it will be necessary to deconstruct the T TESS rubric over time to ensure that everyone is interpreting and applying the rubric in the same manner. 18

There are three (3) different points during the evaluation process to collect evidence: Prior to the lesson, during the lesson, and after the lesson. While during the lesson is perhaps the MOST important time to collect evidence, it is not the only time. Before an announced observation there should be a pre-conference, and a review of materials, e.g., lesson plan, handouts, etc., and after all evaluations there should be a post-conference. The postconference follows a very specific format. 19

This slide shows us the key aspects of announced versus unannounced evaluations. Before an announced evaluation there should be a pre conference, and a review of materials, and after all evaluations there should be a post conference. Evidence is collected at all points. 20

Before an announced observation there will be a short pre conference with your appraiser. Let s think about the purpose of the pre conference. At your table, you will have three minutes to discuss these two questions: What do you view as the purpose for a pre conference? and What are the benefits for you, the teacher? Be prepared to share your responses. The purpose of the pre conference may include responses such as: to clarify the lesson from both perspectives (administrator and teacher) to provide the teacher time to share his/her planning and lesson design process to provide the administrator an opportunity to clarify what he/she might see/hear during the observation to help the teacher think through the lesson etc. Highlight the benefits that support the purpose and intent for T TESS which include teacher and student growth and success. 21

Let s think about the purpose of the pre-conference. At your table, you will have three minutes to discuss these two questions: What do you view as the purpose for a pre-conference? and What are the benefits for you, the teacher? Be prepared to share your responses. The purpose of the pre-conference may include responses such as: - to clarify the lesson from both perspectives (administrator and teacher) - to provide the teacher time to share his/her planning and lesson design process - to provide the administrator an opportunity to clarify what he/she might see/hear during the observation - to help the teacher think through the lesson - etc. Highlight the benefits that support the purpose and intent for T TESS which include teacher and student growth and success. Some questions that may be asked during the pre conference: How are the goals for learning aligned to state content standards? How will technology be integrated into the lesson to support mastery of the lesson s 22

goals? How do you plan for activities, materials, and assessments that are sequenced and relevant to students? How do you decide on the segmenting of a lesson in order to provide appropriate time for student work, the lesson, and lesson closure? How do you decide on activities, materials, and assessments that are appropriate for diverse learners? How does the sequence of the lesson address scaffolded learning and complex concepts as it progresses? In what ways are other disciplines integrated and supported? How do you ensure that your lessons are aligned horizontally with the team? Vertically? Many more can be found in the T TESS Appraiser Sample Conference Questions at teachfortexas.org 22

You are now ready to be in the appraiser seat! What will you focus on while observing a lesson? The teachers will view a lesson and script. Remind them that they will need the evidence to score the lesson; therefore, their task is to script. See next slide for teacher guidance on what to script. 23

Don t worry if this task seems daunting. Just do your best to write down what happens during the lesson. Appraisers spend hours over several days practicing this activity, which gets easier over time! 24

Teachers will view lesson and script lesson notes you will need to be connected to the internet to view the lesson. 25

Have staff members show thumbs up for Proficient Raise the roof hands for Above Proficient Thumbs down for Below Proficient 26

27

Materials: Teachers scripted notes, rubric dimensions, Teacher Handout #2. Teachers will now use their scripted notes (evidence) and categorize this evidence according to the rubric. See Teacher Handout #2. Assign one dimension per table, repeating, as necessary, based on the number of tables. Each table group will only be assigned one dimension. Ideally there are two tables per dimension to compare and calibrate ratings. Remind teachers that they are looking at their specific dimension in the rubric, and beginning at the Proficient level to collect and document their evidence. Their evidence should be specific and clearly connected to the descriptors. We will debrief one dimension at a time. Each table group will share one or two strong pieces of evidence and the rating assigned, based on the evidence and the rubric. As you hear the evidence from other dimensions, take notes on your handout (Teacher Handout #2). After debriefing each dimension, share the T TESS rater scores with the group. (Trainer Handout #2 Lesson Evidence and Ratings sheet.) 28

Let s think about the purpose of the pre conference. At your table, you will have three minutes to discuss these two questions: What do you view as the purpose for a pre conference? and What are the benefits for you, the teacher? Be prepared to share your responses. The purpose of the pre conference may include responses such as: to clarify the lesson from both perspectives (administrator and teacher) to provide the teacher time to share his/her planning and lesson design process to provide the administrator an opportunity to clarify what he/she might see/hear during the observation to help the teacher think through the lesson etc. Highlight the benefits that support the purpose and intent for T TESS which include teacher and student growth and success. 29

Introduce participants to the post conference format. This slide provides the Four Key Elements to the Instructional Post Conference, which follows the lesson. (Review the chart.) Ask participants why we would wait until the end of the post conference to share ratings and evidence. The responses from the participants to this question should be about how they want to encourage reflection; sharing ratings at the beginning of the conference will distract from the purpose of professional growth and reflection on the lesson observation. In order for teachers to understand the structure, it may be beneficial to show them the post conference video (available in the full day version of the training) during a subsequent staff meeting and prior to formal observations. 30

31

Review objectives with the participants. Let s review our objectives to make sure we are on target. 32

33

34

35

Did you GAIN new information that will help you understand T TESS? Do you have it ALL down already? Was this a TIDAL wave of information and you need more time to digest and reflect? Remind participants of the expectations and that we are still moving along the continuum of procedural to conceptual knowledge. This slide will give them a chance to debrief their learnings and professional needs thus far. Have them complete Teacher Handout #3 and leave their copies for next steps and followup. 36

Thank you Connect to your district/school goals and outcomes for student achievement 37

38