Minnesota State University-Mankato. College of Science, Engineering & Technology. Construction Management Department

Similar documents
Colorado State University Department of Construction Management. Assessment Results and Action Plans

Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan,

PROPOSAL FOR NEW UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM. Institution Submitting Proposal. Degree Designation as on Diploma. Title of Proposed Degree Program

SURVEY RESEARCH POLICY TABLE OF CONTENTS STATEMENT OF POLICY REASON FOR THIS POLICY

Proposal for Learning Community Program

Department of Geography Bachelor of Arts in Geography Plan for Assessment of Student Learning Outcomes The University of New Mexico

GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION

Standards and Criteria for Demonstrating Excellence in BACCALAUREATE/GRADUATE DEGREE PROGRAMS

Department of Communication Promotion and Tenure Criteria Guidelines. Teaching

Position Statements. Index of Association Position Statements

2015 Academic Program Review. School of Natural Resources University of Nebraska Lincoln

MINNESOTA STATE UNIVERSITY, MANKATO IPESL (Initiative to Promote Excellence in Student Learning) PROSPECTUS

Procedures for Academic Program Review. Office of Institutional Effectiveness, Academic Planning and Review

Revision and Assessment Plan for the Neumann University Core Experience

Policy for Hiring, Evaluation, and Promotion of Full-time, Ranked, Non-Regular Faculty Department of Philosophy

I. Proposal presentations should follow Degree Quality Assessment Board (DQAB) format.

University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences Programmatic Evaluation Plan

Program Change Proposal:

Saint Louis University Program Assessment Plan. Program Learning Outcomes Curriculum Mapping Assessment Methods Use of Assessment Data

Developing an Assessment Plan to Learn About Student Learning

Statewide Strategic Plan for e-learning in California s Child Welfare Training System

College of Engineering and Applied Science Department of Computer Science

July 17, 2017 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL. John Tafaro, President Chatfield College State Route 251 St. Martin, OH Dear President Tafaro:

LATTC Program Review Instructional -Department Level

University of Toronto

Program Assessment and Alignment

Master of Science (MS) in Education with a specialization in. Leadership in Educational Administration

Oregon Institute of Technology Computer Systems Engineering Technology Department Embedded Systems Engineering Technology Program Assessment

MAINTAINING CURRICULUM CONSISTENCY OF TECHNICAL AND VOCATIONAL EDUCATIONAL PROGRAMS THROUGH TEACHER DESIGN TEAMS

College of Science Promotion & Tenure Guidelines For Use with MU-BOG AA-26 and AA-28 (April 2014) Revised 8 September 2017

BYLAWS of the Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Michigan State University East Lansing, Michigan

D direct? or I indirect?

World s Best Workforce Plan

The Characteristics of Programs of Information

College of Education & Social Services (CESS) Advising Plan April 10, 2015

Chaffey College Program Review Report

Examining the Structure of a Multidisciplinary Engineering Capstone Design Program

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

Lincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal

PROGRAM PRESENTATION

ABET Criteria for Accrediting Computer Science Programs

Mary Washington 2020: Excellence. Impact. Distinction.

Core Strategy #1: Prepare professionals for a technology-based, multicultural, complex world

Request for Proposal UNDERGRADUATE ARABIC FLAGSHIP PROGRAM

Abstract. Janaka Jayalath Director / Information Systems, Tertiary and Vocational Education Commission, Sri Lanka.

South Dakota Board of Regents Intent to Plan for a Master of Engineering (M.Eng)

Student Learning Outcomes: A new model of assessment

Volunteer State Community College Budget and Planning Priorities

Linguistics Program Outcomes Assessment 2012

CAUL Principles and Guidelines for Library Services to Onshore Students at Remote Campuses to Support Teaching and Learning

California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

Strategic Planning for Retaining Women in Undergraduate Computing

Meek School of Journalism and New Media Will Norton, Jr., Professor and Dean Mission. Core Values

ACCREDITATION STANDARDS

Marketing Committee Terms of Reference

STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT

UNIVERSIDAD DEL ESTE Vicerrectoría Académica Vicerrectoría Asociada de Assessment Escuela de Ciencias y Tecnología

Pakistan Engineering Council. PEVs Guidelines

ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES WITHIN ACADEMIC PROGRAMS AT WEST CHESTER UNIVERSITY

University Senate CHARGE

Michigan State University

ANNUAL CURRICULUM REVIEW PROCESS for the 2016/2017 Academic Year

FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY AT DODGE CITY

New Jersey Institute of Technology Newark College of Engineering

VOL VISION 2020 STRATEGIC PLAN IMPLEMENTATION

Individual Interdisciplinary Doctoral Program Faculty/Student HANDBOOK

Managing Sustainable Operations MGMT 410 Bachelor of Business Administration (Sustainable Business Practices) Business Administration Program

SHEEO State Authorization Inventory. Kentucky Last Updated: May 2013

M.S. in Environmental Science Graduate Program Handbook. Department of Biology, Geology, and Environmental Science

FACULTY OF ENGINEERING. Alberto J Tsamba Faculty of Engineering, UEM

Comprehensive Program Review Report (Narrative) College of the Sequoias

Full-time MBA Program Distinguish Yourself.

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

Quality in University Lifelong Learning (ULLL) and the Bologna process

High Performance Computing Club Constitution

NC Global-Ready Schools

ASSESSMENT REPORT FOR GENERAL EDUCATION CATEGORY 1C: WRITING INTENSIVE

4. Long title: Emerging Technologies for Gaming, Animation, and Simulation

Strategic Plan SJI Strategic Plan 2016.indd 1 4/14/16 9:43 AM

Contract Renewal, Tenure, and Promotion a Web Based Faculty Resource

ESTABLISHING A TRAINING ACADEMY. Betsy Redfern MWH Americas, Inc. 380 Interlocken Crescent, Suite 200 Broomfield, CO

Augusta University MPA Program Diversity and Cultural Competency Plan. Section One: Description of the Plan

Degree Qualification Profiles Intellectual Skills

What Is The National Survey Of Student Engagement (NSSE)?

Differential Tuition Budget Proposal FY

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

Developing Highly Effective Industry Partnerships: Co-op to Capstone Courses

Programme Specification. BSc (Hons) RURAL LAND MANAGEMENT

John Jay College of Criminal Justice, CUNY ASSESSMENT REPORT: SPRING Undergraduate Public Administration Major

SHEEO State Authorization Inventory. Indiana Last Updated: October 2011

Governors State University Student Affairs and Enrollment Management: Reaching Vision 2020

Wildlife, Fisheries, & Conservation Biology

Fall Semester Year 1: 15 hours

Ministry of Education, Republic of Palau Executive Summary

South Dakota State University and South Dakota School of Mines and Technology Proposed Graduate Program:

Mathematics Program Assessment Plan

Albemarle County Public Schools School Improvement Plan KEY CHANGES THIS YEAR

Orientation Workshop on Outcome Based Accreditation. May 21st, 2016

The following faculty openings are managed by our traditional hiring process:

Curricular Reviews: Harvard, Yale & Princeton. DUE Meeting

Transcription:

Minnesota State University-Mankato College of Science, Engineering & Technology Construction Management Department QUALITY IMPROVEMENT PLAN (QIP) FOR THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT DEGREE PROGRAM Page 1 of 13

Organization The Quality Improvement Plan (QIP) consists of Strategic Plan for the educational unit, the degree program assessment plan, and the assessment implementation plan for the degree program. The educational unit is the Department of Construction Management. The degree program is Construction Management. Construction Management is the only degree program in the department. Page 2 of 13

ASSESSMENT PLAN FOR THE CONSTRUCTION MANAGEMENT DEGREE PROGRAM Page 3 of 13

Scope The program assessment plan is the degree program comprehensive assessment of effective procedures to determine if the program s goals and learning outcomes are being met. It explains the required assessment data to be collected, the frequency and evaluation methods to be used to examine the performance criteria are met. Program Mission Statement The mission of the Construction Management program is to advance world-class project management for the built environment through effective teaching, research, and service. Program Goals The Construction Management program will provide quality undergraduate and graduate programs that foster student learning through a wide variety of instructional applications. This will be accomplished by the following goals: 1. Curriculum: Offer globally competitive, technologically current programs that are recognized and respected for preparing students to enter the workforce. A. Execution; o Providing a blend of management and technical classes in the program of study which align with the industry needs o Offering the classes in different instructional delivery methods which include face to face, hybrid, and online format o Utilizing opportunities to learn and use the current advanced technology in the construction industry o Providing international opportunities to explore the required knowledge and skills in the global construction industry o Partnering with other educational and professional entities to offer competitive learning opportunities B. Resources Needed; o Availability of faculty positions to hire qualified knowledgeable full and part time faculty members o Availability of funding and capacity to support the required level of technology o Availability of study abroad and/or exchanged students program opportunities C. Performance Criteria; o The ability to offer the expected number and types of required classes will be assessed; the program will follow recommendations from the Advisory Committee as to which new courses to implement. The program will follow the guidelines provided by MnSCU as to the type of courses provided. Page 4 of 13

o The number and the quality of software packages including the hardware units available to students will be assessed; at least a computer lab with 24 seats should be maintained for the different construction classes with the appropriate software packages that serve students in construction drawings, cost estimating, scheduling, and project management o Number of students who would benefit from the international opportunities will be assessed; at least one study abroad program will be available to students in the CM program o The ability to have different partnership agreements with educational and professional entities will be assessed; at least one partnership agreement shall be maintained to offer competitive learning opportunities D. Assessment Method; o Students, alumni, employers and/or IAB surveys, and the assessment of the reported qualitative and quantitative data will be collected and analyzed E. Assessment Period; Fall 2016 2. Advising: Provide effective academic and career advising to foster a commitment to lifelong learning. A. Execution; o Collaborating with the college advising center to support student needs o Assigning the appropriate number of advisees to the different full time faculty in the program o Creating the effective and efficient tools to facilitate the advising effort at the program level B. Resources Needed; o The college advising center support o Faculty time commitment to students advising effort in the program C. Performance Criteria; o The ability to have the appropriate faculty advising load to achieve a successful learning experience for students will be assessed; the advising load will be equally assigned among all full time tenured and tenure-track faculty. o The students satisfaction rate of their advising experience will be assessed; satisfaction rate will be maintained at 80% and above from survey feedback. F. Assessment Method; o Students survey, and the assessment of the reported qualitative and quantitative data will be collected and analyzed D. Assessment Period; Fall 2017 3. Student Activity: Involve students in industry-sponsored events to facilitate students' professional development prior to graduation. A. Execution; o Enhancing the student chapter Construction Management Student Association (CMSA) activities that would create networking opportunities and develop the professional and managerial soft skills in the construction industry Page 5 of 13

o Participating in construction related student competitions o Enhancing the extra-curricular activities B. Resources Needed; o A faculty advisor to support the students chapter o The industry professional and financial support to provide these opportunities o An active student chapter organization C. Performance Criteria; o The ability to have at least one event each semester for students to support their professional development will be assessed; two events will be maintained annually o The appropriate number of students in teams to participate in competitions will be assessed; the CMSA officers with the program faculty agreed that at least one student competition and one team to participate should be maintained every year. o The availability of the appropriate funding capacity will be assessed; the CMSA officers with the program faculty agreed that at least ten thousand dollars should be raised every year to maintain students activities and networking opportunities D. Assessment Method; o Assessment report of at least two event every year, which includes the number of participated students with the available financial data E. Assessment Period; Fall 2015 4. Faculty Development: Provide opportunities that enhance professional growth, provide expertise to industry and government partners and promote active learning for faculty and students. A. Execution; o Encouraging and providing opportunities to faculty to acquire the appropriate continuing & professional training and certification o Providing continuing & professional education opportunities to professionals in the industry to improve their skills. B. Resources Needed; o Allocating time and grants to faculty C. Performance Criteria; o Number of professional training events will be assessed; at least one professional/ training event each full time faculty shall participate in. o Total amount of funding allocated to these training events will be assessed; at least $1,300 will be assigned by the university for each full time faculty to be used for professional development activities and any extra required funding will be evaluated annually by the program D. Assessment Method; o The number and the description of the training events, total expenditure amount on training and professional development activities will be assessed and analyzed Page 6 of 13

E. Assessment Period; Fall 2017 5. External Support: Maintain a stable and effective Advisory Board to provide industry perspective and financial support to faculty and to grant students scholarships and job opportunities. A. Execution; o Hosting and promoting industry advisory board (IAB) meetings o Collaborating with the IAB members in the different committees to provide the appropriate curriculum, program development, sponsorship, and financial support opportunities B. Resources Needed; o An adequate number of advisory board members o Professional and Funding capacity by the IAB members C. Performance Criteria; o The ability to have more than one collaboration event with IAB members each academic year will be assessed; two IAB meetings with faculty will be maintained annually o Total amount of financial support to faculty development activities will be assessed; one thousand dollars will be maintained to fund each full time faculty development activities o Total number of awarded scholarships and the dollar amount of funding awarded will be assessed; at least $10,000 dollars will be maintained for scholarships for at least 10 awarded scholarships D. Assessment Method; o Assessment report of at least two meetings every year including the reported financial data E. Assessment Period; Fall 2015 6. Assessment & Planning: Implement planning and assessment methods that anticipate program needs to maximize available resources in support of our mission and goals. A. Execution; o Developing a Program Quality Strategic Plan o Developing Program Assessment Plan o Developing Quality Assessment Implementation Plan B. Resources Needed; o Program and faculty commitment to the continues improvement efforts and reports o Availability of the tools and mechanism to collect the supporting data from the different stakeholders C. Performance Criteria; Page 7 of 13

o Developing performance assessment implementation report that align with the program strategic plan, university policies and the accreditation requirements; the report will be analyzed D. Assessment Method; o The renewal of ACCE accreditation and assess the final report as needed with the follow up action items E. Assessment Period; Fall 2016 Program Learning Outcomes: The ACCE SLO s have been adopted as the program learning outcomes which are included in the following table; Mapping the Construction Management Program Learning Outcomes with the Institutional Undergraduate Students Learning Outcomes Program LO s 1. Create written communications appropriate to the construction discipline 2. Create oral presentations appropriate to the construction discipline Institution LO s Academic Achievement - Students will demonstrate competence in specific areas of academic disciplines that will directly impact their career endeavors. Communication - Students will demonstrate the ability to effectively communicate verbally, in writing, and through digital and/or visual media. Academic Achievement - Students will demonstrate competence in specific areas of academic disciplines that will directly impact their career endeavors. Communication - Students will demonstrate the ability to effectively communicate verbally, in writing, and through digital and/or visual media. 3. Create a construction project safety plan Academic Achievement - Students will demonstrate competence in specific areas of academic disciplines that will directly impact their career endeavors. Critical Thinking - Students will demonstrate the ability to analyze situations and problems in order to identify and test solutions. 4. Create construction project cost estimates Academic Achievement - Students will demonstrate competence in specific areas of academic disciplines that will directly impact their career endeavors. Page 8 of 13

Critical Thinking - Students will demonstrate the ability to analyze situations and problems in order to identify and test solutions. 5. Create construction project schedules Academic Achievement - Students will demonstrate competence in specific areas of academic disciplines that will directly impact their career endeavors. 6. Analyze professional decisions based on ethical principles 7. Analyze construction documents for planning and management of construction processes Critical Thinking - Students will demonstrate the ability to analyze situations and problems in order to identify and test solutions. Civic Engagement - Students will demonstrate the awareness, knowledge, and skills to actively participate individually or collectively on issues of societal concern. 8. Analyze methods, materials, and equipment used to construct projects 9. Apply construction management skills as a member of a multi-disciplinary team 10. Apply electronic-based technology to manage the construction process 11. Apply basic surveying techniques for construction layout and control 12. Understand different methods of project delivery and the roles and responsibilities of all constituencies involved in the design and construction process 13. Understand construction risk management 14. Understand construction accounting and cost control 15. Understand construction quality assurance and control 16. Understand construction project control processes 17. Understand the legal implications of contract, common, and regulatory law to manage a construction project 18. Understand the basic principles of sustainable construction Page 9 of 13

19. Understand the basic principles of structural behavior 20. Understand the basic principles of mechanical, electrical and piping systems Assessment Tools for Program Goals The main assessment tools for program goals are: 1. Students, alumni and employer surveys. Surveys are conducted manually and/or electronically for indirect assessment (IA) of progress on program goals. The new developed survey is based on the new ACCE outcomes which measure each group of stockholder perceptions regarding the achievement of program goals. 2. Some program objectives can be assessed based on specific achievements whether qualitative or quantitative targets. These are described in the program strategic plan. Performance Criteria for Program Goals The performance criteria for each program goal is found under item C for each measurable item under the degree program goals Evaluation Methodology for Program Goals Using the specified tools to assure that assessments will be performed and analyzed according to the defined cycle. The assessment procedure is the responsibility of the department chair. The results and the any actions taken will be shared with the different stockholders and published on the department website. Suggestions from improvement will be solicited from the IAB members and faculty. Frequency of Assessment for Program Goals The program goals will be assessed, analyzed and reported over three year cycle as identified in the first part of this assessment plan. Page 10 of 13

Mapping the ACCE Students Learning Outcomes with Program Goals including the assessment cycle year Year of ACCE LO s Assessment 1. Create written communications 2015 appropriate to the construction discipline. 2. Create oral presentations appropriate to 2016 the construction discipline. 3. Create a construction project safety plan. 2016 4. Create construction project cost estimates. 2016 5. Create construction project schedules. 2015 6. Analyze professional decisions based on 2017 ethical principles. 7. Analyze construction documents for 2017 planning and management of construction processes. 8. Analyze methods, materials, and 2018 equipment used to construct projects. 9. Apply construction management skills as 2017 a member of a multi-disciplinary team. 10. Apply electronic-based technology to 2015 manage the construction process. 11. Apply basic surveying techniques for 2016 construction layout and control. 12. Understand different methods of project 2015 delivery and the roles and responsibilities of all constituencies involved in the design and construction process. 13. Understand construction risk 2018 management. 14. Understand construction accounting and 2019 cost control. 15. Understand construction quality assurance 2018 and control. 16. Understand construction project control 2019 processes. 17. Understand the legal implications of 2017 contract, common, and regulatory law to manage a construction project. 18. Understand the basic principles of 2019 sustainable construction. 19. Understand the basic principles of 2018 structural behavior. 20. Understand the basic principles of mechanical, electrical and piping systems. 2019 Program Goals Curriculum: Offer globally competitive, technologically current programs that are recognized and respected for preparing students to enter the workforce. This program goal is the only goal that mapped against ACCE LO s Year of Assessment Fall 2016 Page 11 of 13

Assessment Tools for Program Learning Outcomes (PLO s) The main assessment tools for PLO s are: 1. Students, alumni and employer surveys will be utilized. Surveys are indirect assessment (IA) and conducted manually and/or electronically of progress on PLO s. The new developed surveys is based on the new ACCE outcomes which measure each group of stockholder perceptions regarding the achievement of PLO s. 2. Embedded course assessments will be utilized. Course assessments are direct assessments (DA), they include but not limited to; exams, assignments, quizzes, and projects. They are performed by the instructor of the course to support the PLO. Performance Criteria for Program Learning Outcomes (PLO s) Direct assessment (DA): the performance criteria of DA is that if 70% of the students score at least 70% on the assessment, the PLO is met. A score below 70% calls for explanation and may require corrective action. Indirect assessment (IA): the performance criteria of IA is 70%. If the average rank on a Likert scale is 70% or above, the PLO is met. A score below 70% calls for explanation and may require corrective action. However, the subjective nature of surveys will be recognized. Responses of Not Applicable will be discounted. Evaluation Methodology for Program Learning Outcomes (PLO s) Using the specified tools to assure that assessments will be performed and analyzed according to the defined cycle. The assessment procedure is the responsibility of the department chair. The results and the actions taken will be shared with the different stockholders and published on the department website. Suggestions from improvement will be solicited from the IAB members and faculty. An assessment table that shows the program major courses and assessment methods is included below. At least two assessments will be used for each PLO, which include at least one DA and another that can be DA or IA. Each PLO will be assessed in at least one construction management course. Frequency of Assessment for Program Learning Outcomes (PLO s) The program learning outcomes will be assessed and analyzed over five year cycle. The year of assessment is identified previously. Page 12 of 13

MSU-Mankato Construction Management Degree PLOs/ SLOs Assessment Map Construction Work Exp. Intro to Construction Management Construction Graphics Construction Documents Construction Materials and Methods I Construction Materials and Methods II Introduction to Statics and Mechanics of Materials Civil Engineering Measurement Construction Professional Practice Construction Safety Estimating I Planning and Scheduling Construction Project Management Mechanical and Electrical Systems for Construction Construction Equipment Management Estimating II Construction Capstone Project Construction Seminar Internship Construction and Design Law Graduating Senior Survey Cycle Year Legend Direct Assessment (DA) -evidence of student learning is in the form of a student product or performance that can be evaluated Indirect Assessment (IA)- evidence is the perception, opinion, or attitude of students (or others). **Two direct assessment will be used CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM CM BL 108 111 120 130 210 220 222 271 297 300 310 330 340 350 380 410 450 492 497 476 1 2 Program/ Student Learning Outcomes PLOs/SLOs Create written communications appropriate to the constuction discipline DA DA IA 1 Create oral presentations appropriate to the construction discipline DA DA IA IA 2 3 Create a construction project safety plan DA IA IA 2 4 Create construction project cost estimates DA DA IA IA 2 5 Create construction project schedules DA IA IA 1 6 Analyze professional decisions based on ethical principles DA IA 3 7 8 9 10 11 12 Analyze construction documents for planning and management of construction processes DA IA IA 3 Analyze methods, materials, and equipment used to construct projects DA DA IA 4 Apply construction management skills as a member of a multidisciplinary team DA IA IA 3 Apply electronic-based technology to manage the construction process DA IA IA 1 Apply basic survey techniques for construction layout and control DA** IA 2 Understand different methods of project delivery and the roles and responsibilities of all constituencies involved in the design and construction process DA DA IA 1 13 Understand construction risk management DA IA IA 4 14 Understand construction accounting and cost control DA IA 5 15 Understand construction quality assurance and control DA IA IA 4 16 Understand construction project control and processes DA DA IA 5 Understand the legal implications of contract, common, and 17 regulatory law to manage a construction project DA DA IA 3 18 Understand the basic principles of sustainable construction DA DA IA 5 19 Understand the basic principles of structual behavior DA DA IA 4 Understand the basic principles of mechanical, electrical, and 20 piping systems DA DA IA 5 Page 13 of 13