Appendix to The Teaching Profession

Similar documents
The European Higher Education Area in 2012:

PROGRESS TOWARDS THE LISBON OBJECTIVES IN EDUCATION AND TRAINING

ESTONIA. spotlight on VET. Education and training in figures. spotlight on VET

EQE Candidate Support Project (CSP) Frequently Asked Questions - National Offices

Educating for innovationdriven

SOCRATES PROGRAMME GUIDELINES FOR APPLICANTS

EUROPEAN-ACCREDITED ENGINEERING MASTER DEGREE PROGRAMME.

UNIVERSITY AUTONOMY IN EUROPE II

The Survey of Adult Skills (PIAAC) provides a picture of adults proficiency in three key information-processing skills:

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES RECOMMENDATION OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL

Summary and policy recommendations

EXEM ECVET Profile for the European Expert in Energy Management

PROJECT RELEASE: Towards achieving Self REgulated LEArning as a core in teachers' In-SErvice training in Cyprus

COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES. COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT Accompanying document to the

An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Mexican American Studies Participation on Student Achievement within Tucson Unified School District

Evaluation of Teach For America:

INSTRUCTION MANUAL. Survey of Formal Education

May To print or download your own copies of this document visit Name Date Eurovision Numeracy Assignment

A comparative study on cost-sharing in higher education Using the case study approach to contribute to evidence-based policy

Referencing the Danish Qualifications Framework for Lifelong Learning to the European Qualifications Framework

RCPCH MMC Cohort Study (Part 4) March 2016

The recognition, evaluation and accreditation of European Postgraduate Programmes.

UNDERSTANDING THE INITIAL CAREER DECISIONS OF HOSPITALITY MANAGEMENT GRADUATES IN SRI LANKA

Educational system gaps in Romania. Roberta Mihaela Stanef *, Alina Magdalena Manole

Impact of Educational Reforms to International Cooperation CASE: Finland

Greek Teachers Attitudes toward the Inclusion of Students with Special Educational Needs

SASKATCHEWAN MINISTRY OF ADVANCED EDUCATION

NA/2006/17 Annexe-1 Lifelong Learning Programme for Community Action in the Field of Lifelong Learning (Lifelong Learning Programme LLP)

Research Update. Educational Migration and Non-return in Northern Ireland May 2008

From Empire to Twenty-First Century Britain: Economic and Political Development of Great Britain in the 19th and 20th Centuries 5HD391

2007 No. xxxx EDUCATION, ENGLAND. The Further Education Teachers Qualifications (England) Regulations 2007

Professional Development and Training for Young Teachers in Russia

Effective Pre-school and Primary Education 3-11 Project (EPPE 3-11)

Abstract. Janaka Jayalath Director / Information Systems, Tertiary and Vocational Education Commission, Sri Lanka.

State of play of EQF implementation in Montenegro Zora Bogicevic, Ministry of Education Rajko Kosovic, VET Center

UPPER SECONDARY CURRICULUM OPTIONS AND LABOR MARKET PERFORMANCE: EVIDENCE FROM A GRADUATES SURVEY IN GREECE

Science and Technology Indicators. R&D statistics

DISCUSSION PAPER. In 2006 the population of Iceland was 308 thousand people and 62% live in the capital area.

CALL FOR PARTICIPANTS

Study on the implementation and development of an ECVET system for apprenticeship

Council of the European Union Brussels, 4 November 2015 (OR. en)

EUROPEAN UNIVERSITIES LOOKING FORWARD WITH CONFIDENCE PRAGUE DECLARATION 2009

WP 2: Project Quality Assurance. Quality Manual

Financing of Higher Education in Latin America Lessons from Chile, Brazil, and Mexico

Students with Disabilities, Learning Difficulties and Disadvantages STATISTICS AND INDICATORS

Embedded College Review for Educational Oversight by the Quality Assurance Agency for Higher Education

ehealth Governance Initiative: Joint Action JA-EHGov & Thematic Network SEHGovIA DELIVERABLE Version: 2.4 Date:

Quality in University Lifelong Learning (ULLL) and the Bologna process

TK1019 NZ DIPLOMA IN ENGINEERING (CIVIL) Programme Information

Participant Report Form Call 2015 KA1 Mobility of Staff in higher education - Staff mobility for teaching and training activities

Question 1 Does the concept of "part-time study" exist in your University and, if yes, how is it put into practice, is it possible in every Faculty?

Assessment and national report of Poland on the existing training provisions of professionals in the Healthcare Waste Management industry REPORT: III

How and Why Has Teacher Quality Changed in Australia?

PROJECT PERIODIC REPORT

Courses below are sorted by the column Field of study for your better orientation. The list is subject to change.

MODERNISATION OF HIGHER EDUCATION PROGRAMMES IN THE FRAMEWORK OF BOLOGNA: ECTS AND THE TUNING APPROACH

Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 191 ( 2015 ) WCES Why Do Students Choose To Study Information And Communications Technology?

Introduction to the European Credit system for Vocational Education and Training ECVET. EACEA Expert briefing Brussels 25 March 2010

How to Judge the Quality of an Objective Classroom Test

3 of Policy. Linking your Erasmus+ Schools project to national and European Policy

Access Center Assessment Report

Application for Postgraduate Studies (Research)

Robert Kreitz Ulrich Teichler. ERASMUS Teaching Staff Mobility. The 1990/ 91 Teachers' View. Werkstattberichte 53

Staff Management in Adult Education Institutions

EMPIRICAL RESEARCH ON THE ACCOUNTING AND FINANCE STUDENTS OPINION ABOUT THE PERSPECTIVE OF THEIR PROFESSIONAL TRAINING AND CAREER PROSPECTS

IS FINANCIAL LITERACY IMPROVED BY PARTICIPATING IN A STOCK MARKET GAME?

Analyzing the Usage of IT in SMEs

Decisions of the meeting of the Board of Governors of the European Schools

American Journal of Business Education October 2009 Volume 2, Number 7

Modern Trends in Higher Education Funding. Tilea Doina Maria a, Vasile Bleotu b

What is related to student retention in STEM for STEM majors? Abstract:

Knowledge for the Future Developments in Higher Education and Research in the Netherlands

Student attrition at a new generation university

Accessing Higher Education in Developing Countries: panel data analysis from India, Peru and Vietnam

FACULTY OF PSYCHOLOGY

Evaluation Report Output 01: Best practices analysis and exhibition

Studies on Key Skills for Jobs that On-Site. Professionals from Construction Industry Demand

The AFR PhD and Postdoc Grant Scheme for Research Training in Luxembourg

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Educational Indicators

Demographic Survey for Focus and Discussion Groups

international PROJECTS MOSCOW

Report of External Evaluation and Review

Innovative elearning Tool for Quality Training Material in VET. Dr. László Komáromi SZÁMALK / Dennis Gabor Univ.

EDEXCEL FUNCTIONAL SKILLS PILOT. Maths Level 2. Chapter 7. Working with probability

Financiación de las instituciones europeas de educación superior. Funding of European higher education institutions. Resumen

A. What is research? B. Types of research

Updated: December Educational Attainment

Youth Sector 5-YEAR ACTION PLAN ᒫᒨ ᒣᔅᑲᓈᐦᒉᑖ ᐤ. Office of the Deputy Director General

WOMEN RESEARCH RESULTS IN ARCHITECTURE AND URBANISM

Environment Josef Malach Kateřina Kostolányová Milan Chmura

Research training and national innovation systems in Australia, Finland and the United States

Engineers and Engineering Brand Monitor 2015

Department of Education and Skills. Memorandum

Study Abroad: Planning and Development, Successes and Challenges

San Ignacio-Santa Elena Municipal Profile

This Access Agreement is for only, to align with the WPSA and in light of the Browne Review.

What do Medical Students Need to Learn in Their English Classes?

NATIONAL REPORTS

ANALYSIS: LABOUR MARKET SUCCESS OF VOCATIONAL AND HIGHER EDUCATION GRADUATES

Transcription:

Appendix to The Teaching Profession in Europe Practices, Perceptions, and Policies Eurydice Report Education and Training

Appendix to The Teaching Profession in Europe: Practices, Perceptions, and Policies This appendix contains all statistical data presented in graphics or discussed in the report. Data tables are presented by chapter in the order of appearance in the report, together with the standard errors (if applicable). For TALIS statistical data, an explanatory note, located below each Table, specifies the reference in the TALIS 2013 questionnaire of the questions used for the calculation. The TALIS questionnaires are divided in two parts: principal questionnaire: the questions codes included in this part starts with 'TC' (e.g.: TC2G04A); teacher questionnaire: the reference of questions included in this part starts with 'TT' (e.g.: TT2G01). To consult the wording of a question, please see the TALIS questionnaires, which are available at: http://www.oecd.org/edu/school/questionnaires%20talis%202013.pdf. The full 2013 TALIS database is available at http://stats.oecd.org/index.aspx?datasetcode=talis_2013%20. More information on the statistical methodology (calculation of EU averages, correlations, indexes, etc.) is available in the Statistical Note of the Eurydice Report, The Teaching Profession in Europe: Practices, Perceptions, and Policies, which can be downloaded at: https://webgate.ec.europa.eu/fpfis/mwikis/eurydice/index.php/publications:the_teaching_profession_in_europe:_practices,_perception s,_and_policies. Please note that this appendix is also available in xls format at the same address. Eurydice Report Education and Training

This document is published by the Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency (EACEA, Education and Youth Policy Analysis). Please cite this publication as: European Commission/EACEA/Eurydice, 2015. Appendix to the Teaching Profession in Europe: Practices, Perceptions, and Policies. Eurydice Report. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. ISBN 978-92-9201-901-3 doi:10.2797/682522 EC-01-15-454-EN-N This document is also available on the Internet (http://ec.europa.eu/eurydice). Text completed in June 2015. Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency, 2015. Reproduction is authorized provided the source is acknowledged. Education, Audiovisual and Culture Executive Agency Education and Youth Policy Analysis Avenue du Bourget 1 (BOU2 Unit A7) B-1049 Brussels Tel. +32 2 299 50 58 Fax +32 2 292 19 71 E-mail: eacea-eurydice@ec.europa.eu Website: http://ec.europa.eu/eurydice

CONTENT DEMOGRAPHICS AND WORKING CONDITIONS 7 Table 1.1: Proportion of teachers by gender in lower secondary education (ISCED 2), 2013 7 Table 1.2: Proportion by age group of men and women teachers in lower secondary education (ISCED 2), 2013 7 Table 1.3: Proportion by age group of teachers in lower secondary education (ISCED 2), 2013 8 Table 1.4: Proportion of teachers employed in public-sector and private schools in lower secondary education (ISCED 2), 2013 8 Table 1.5: Proportion of teachers working in public schools, government-dependent private institutions, and private independent institutions in lower secondary education (ISCED 2), 2013 8 Table 1.6: Proportion of teachers working in public schools, government-dependent private institutions, and private independent institutions, according to age groups in lower secondary education (ISCED 2), 2013 9 INITIAL TEACHER EDUCATION AND TRANSITION TO THE PROFESSION 10 Table 2.1: Proportion of teachers in lower secondary (ISCED 2), by highest qualification level achieved and current age group, 2013 10 Table 2.2: Proportion of teachers in lower secondary education (ISCED 2) who have completed ITE, 2013 10 Table 2.3: Proportion of teachers in lower secondary education (ISCED 2) who have completed ITE, by age group, 2013 11 Table 2.4: Proportion of teachers in lower secondary education (ISCED 2) who have completed ITE, by subject taught, 2013 11 Table 2.5: Proportion of teachers in lower secondary education (ISCED 2) who have completed an ITE programme that includes teaching content, theory and practice, 2013 11 Table 2.6: Proportion, by age group, of teachers in lower secondary education (ISCED 2) who have completed an ITE programme that includes teaching content, theory and practice, 2013 11 Table 2.7: Proportion, by subject taught, of teachers in lower secondary education (ISCED 2) who have completed an ITE programme that includes teaching content, theory and practice, 2013 12 Table 2.8: The feeling of readiness among teachers in lower secondary education (ISCED 2) for work based on the content, theory and practice of teaching, depending on whether or not they have completed ITE, 2013 12 Table 2.9: Proportion of teachers with no more than five years of experience in lower secondary education (ISCED 2) who took part in formal induction programmes as newcomers to teaching, 2013 13 Table 2.10: The predictive value of certain selected factors in participation by teachers in lower secondary education (ISCED 2) in induction programmes, as newcomers to their profession, 2013 13 Table 2.11: Proportion of teachers in lower secondary education (ISCED 2) who can access certain types of activity within induction programmes, as reported by school heads, 2013 13 Table 2.12: Proportion, by age group, of teachers in lower secondary education (ISCED 2), who have currently been assigned a mentor, 2013 14 Table 2.13: The predictive value of certain selected factors in the current assignment of a mentor to teachers in lower secondary education (ISCED 2), 2013 14 Table 2.14: The predictive value of certain selected factors in the designation, as mentors, of teachers in lower secondary education (ISCED 2), 2013 14 CONTINUING PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT 15 Table 3.1: Scale of overall needs in professional development, as expressed by teachers in lower secondary education (ISCED 2), 2013 15 Table 3.2: Scale of overall needs in professional development, as expressed by teachers in lower secondary education (ISCED 2), according to age group, 2013 15 Table 3.3: Scale of overall needs in professional development, as expressed by teachers in lower secondary education (ISCED 2), according to years of experience, 2013 15 Table 3.4: Proportion of teachers in lower secondary education (ISCED 2) expressing moderate and high professional development need levels, in relation to 14 topics, 2013 16 3

The Teaching Profession in Europe: Practices, Perceptions, and Policies Table 3.5: Proportion of teachers by age group in lower secondary education (ISCED 2) expressing moderate and high professional development need levels, in relation to 14 topics, 2013 17 Table 3.6.a: Proportion of lower secondary (ISCED 2) teachers teaching 'READING, WRITING AND LITERATURE' expressing moderate or high professional development need levels, in relation to 14 topics, 2013 20 Table 3.6.b: Proportion of lower secondary (ISCED 2) teachers teaching 'MATHEMATICS' expressing moderate or high professional development need levels, in relmation to 14 topics, 2013 21 Table 3.6.c: Proportion of lower secondary (ISCED 2) teachers teaching 'SCIENCE' expressing moderate or high professional development need levels, in relation to 14 topics, 2013 22 Table 3.6.d: Proportion of lower secondary (ISCED 2) teachers teaching 'SOCIAL STUDIES' expressing moderate or high professional development need levels, in relation to 14 topics, 2013 23 Table 3.6.e: Proportion of lower secondary (ISCED 2) teachers teaching 'MODERN FOREIGN LANGUAGES' expressing moderate or high professional development need levels, in relation to 14 topics, 2013 24 Table 3.7: Differences between the proportions of teachers in lower secondary education (ISCED 2) who expressed moderate and high professional development need levels, and the proportions expected to do so, in relation to 14 topics, 2013 25 Table 3.8: Proportion of teachers in lower secondary education (ISCED 2) who have followed different types of professional development activities in the 12 month previous to the survey, 2013 26 Table 3.9: Average number of topics covered in professional development activities in the 12 months previous to the survey, as declared by lower secondary (ISCED 2) teachers, 2013 26 Table 3.10: Median and mean number of days devoted to structured professional development activities in the 12 months previous to the survey, as declared by lower secondary (ISCED 2) teachers, 2013 26 Table 3.11: Proportion of teachers in lower secondary education (ISCED 2) declaring that their professional development activities covered specific topics in the 12 months prior to the survey, 2013 27 Table 3.12: Proportion of teachers by age group in lower secondary education (ISCED 2) declaring that their professional development activities covered specific topics in the 12 months prior to the survey, 2013 28 Table 3.13.a Proportion of lower secondary (ISCED 2) teachers teaching 'READING. WRITING. AND LITERATURE' declaring that their professional development activities covered specific topics in the 12 months prior to the survey, 2013 31 Table 3.13.b Proportion of lower secondary (ISCED 2) teachers teaching 'MATHEMATICS' declaring that their professional development activities covered specific topics in the 12 months prior to the survey, 2013 32 Table 3.13.c Proportion of lower secondary (ISCED 2) teachers teaching 'SCIENCE' declaring that their professional development activities covered specific topics in the 12 months prior to the survey, 2013 33 Table 3.13.d Proportion of lower secondary (ISCED 2) teachers teaching 'SOCIAL STUDIES' declaring that their professional development activities covered specific topics in the 12 months prior to the survey, 2013 34 Table 3.13.e Proportion of lower secondary (ISCED 2) teachers teaching 'MODERN FOREIGN LANGUAGES' declaring that their professional development activities covered specific topics in the 12 months prior to the survey, 2013 35 Table 3.14: Differences between the proportions of teachers in lower secondary education (ISCED 2) declaring that their professional development activities covered specific topics in the 12 months prior to the survey, and the proportions expected to do so, in relation to 14 topics, 2013 36 Table 3.15: Proportion of teachers in lower secondary education (ISCED 2) who have not followed professional development activities in the 12 months prior to the survey in the topics for which they expressed moderate and high levels of need, 2013 36 Table 3.16: Regression coefficients between typology of barrier to participation in professional development activities indicated by lower secondary (ISCED 2) teachers and mean topics followed, 2013 37 Table 3.17: Proportion of lower secondary (ISCED 2) teachers declaring having received incentives for professional development activities according to its type, 2013 38 Table 3.18: Average number of topics included in professional development activities followed by lower secondary (ISCED 2) teachers in the 12 months previous to the survey, according to financial costs, 2013 38 Table 3.19: Regression coefficients for lower secondary (ISCED 2) teachers between the average number of topics covered by professional development activities in the 12 months previous to the survey and professional development characteristics, feedback, and collaborative approaches as independent variables, 2013 38 4

Appendix Table 3.20: Increased likelihood for lower secondary (ISCED 2) teachers to indicate a specific barrier to participation in professional development activities depending on their gender, experience as a teacher, and their contractual status, 2013 39 TRANSNATIONAL MOBILITY 40 Table 4.1: Proportion of teachers in lower secondary education (ISCED 2) who have been abroad for professional purposes, 2013 40 Table 4.2: Mean ages of teachers in lower secondary education (ISCED 2) who have been abroad or not for professional purposes, 2013 40 Table 4.3: Distribution of teachers in lower secondary education (ISCED 2) who have been abroad for professional purposes, during ITE or as practising teachers (or both), 2013 40 Table 4.4: Mean ages of teachers in lower secondary education (ISCED 2) who have been abroad for professional purposes during ITE or as practising teachers, 2013 40 Table 4.5: Proportion of teachers in lower secondary education (ISCED 2) who have been abroad for professional purposes, by subject taught, 2013 41 Table 4.6: Proportion of mobile teachers in lower secondary education (ISCED 2), with respect to their professional reasons for going abroad, 2013 41 Table 4.7: Proportion of teachers in lower secondary education (ISCED 2) who have gone abroad for professional purposes with the support of mobility programme, 2013 42 Table 4.8: Predictive effect of 11 selected factors on the transnational mobility for professional purposes of teachers in lower secondary education (ISCED 2), 2013 42 Table 4.9: Distribution of teachers in lower secondary education (ISCED 2), according to the three criteria of transnational mobility, teaching of modern foreign languages, and gender, 2013 43 ATTRACTIVENESS OF THE TEACHING PROFESSION 43 Table 5.1: Proportion of teachers who express job satisfaction, satisfaction with their school, and perceive the teaching profession to be valued in society, in lower secondary education (ISCED 2), 2013 43 Table 5.2: Proportion of teachers who express job satisfaction, satisfaction with their school, and perceive the teaching profession to be valued in society, according to age groups, in lower secondary education (ISCED 2), 2013 44 Table 5.4: Proportion of teachers who express job satisfaction, satisfaction with their school, and perceive the teaching profession to be valued in society, according to gender, in lower secondary education (ISCED 2), 2013 46 Table 5.5: Proportion of teachers in lower secondary (ISCED 2) education who express job satisfaction, satisfaction with their school, and consider the teaching profession to be valued in society, in relation to perceived evaluation (feedback) outcomes, 2013 46 Table 5.6: Proportion of teachers in lower secondary (ISCED 2) education who express job satisfaction, satisfaction with their school, and consider the teaching profession to be valued in society, in relation to types of collaborative practices, 2013 50 Table 5.7: Proportion of teachers in lower secondary (ISCED 2) education who express job satisfaction, satisfaction with their school, and consider the teaching profession to be valued in society, in relation to their view of teacher-student relations, 2013 51 5

The Teaching Profession in Europe: Practices, Perceptions, and Policies 6

APPENDIX DEMOGRAPHICS AND WORKING CONDITIONS Table 1.1: Proportion of teachers by gender in lower secondary education (ISCED 2), 2013 % EU BE BG CZ DK DE EE IE EL ES FR HR IT CY LV Male 32.2 37.0 19.1 26.0 29.1 34.9 17.9 : 33.8 42.2 35.5 : 21.1 29.5 16.1 Female 67.8 63.0 80.9 74.0 70.9 65.1 82.1 : 66.2 57.8 64.5 : 78.9 70.5 83.9 % LT LU HU MT NL AT PL PT RO SI SK FI SE UK Male 17.7 43.2 22.3 30.8 49.3 28.5 26.2 28.9 30.7 21.0 23.7 27.8 23.1 37.0 Female 82.3 56.8 77.7 69.2 50.7 71.5 73.8 71.1 69.3 79.0 76.3 72.2 76.9 63.0 Source: Eurydice, on the basis of Eurostat/UOE [extracted April 2015] (see Figure 1.1). Table 1.2: Proportion by age group of men and women teachers in lower secondary education (ISCED 2), 2013 % <30 years 30-39 years 40-49 years 50-59 years 60 years Men Women Men Women Men Women Men Women Men Women EU 28.8 71.2 32.3 67.7 30.6 69.4 31.8 68.2 42.3 57.7 BE 28.7 71.3 35.0 65.0 38.6 61.4 41.2 58.8 59.4 40.6 BG 25.1 74.9 15.8 84.2 15.6 84.4 18.7 81.3 47.8 52.2 CZ 34.2 65.8 38.0 62.0 17.6 82.4 18.8 81.2 52.0 48.0 DK 28.1 71.9 29.7 70.3 25.6 74.4 28.9 71.1 37.6 62.4 DE 21.6 78.4 35.9 64.1 35.8 64.2 31.3 68.7 47.3 52.7 EE 20.3 79.7 19.2 80.8 15.5 84.5 17.8 82.2 19.1 80.9 IE : : : : : : : : : : EL 24.8 75.2 26.9 73.1 30.3 69.7 39.7 60.3 60.6 39.4 ES 33.6 66.4 39.3 60.7 40.8 59.2 46.2 53.8 50.5 49.5 FR 31.1 68.9 35.1 64.9 35.3 64.7 37.9 62.1 35.7 64.3 HR : : : : : : : : : : IT 71.8 28.2 21.2 78.8 16.6 83.4 22.1 77.9 25.1 74.9 CY 19.5 80.5 23.1 76.9 40.7 59.3 29.1 70.9 51.3 48.7 LV 32.7 67.3 15.5 84.5 12.4 87.6 16.2 83.8 18.3 81.7 LT 24.5 75.5 15.2 84.8 14.8 85.2 18.5 81.5 23.9 76.1 LU 30.6 69.4 43.5 56.5 46.4 53.6 54.6 45.4 58.8 41.2 HU 28.8 71.2 23.3 76.7 20.8 79.2 21.2 78.8 33.4 66.6 MT 23.3 76.7 29.0 71.0 38.8 61.2 40.8 59.2 48.6 51.4 NL 38.2 61.8 42.4 57.6 43.9 56.1 55.9 44.1 69.9 30.1 AT 23.9 76.1 30.0 70.0 25.7 74.3 28.7 71.3 48.6 51.4 PL 29.6 70.4 26.8 73.2 25.2 74.8 24.2 75.8 35.8 64.2 PT 35.8 64.2 30.6 69.4 26.2 73.8 29.7 70.3 41.0 59.0 RO 24.8 75.2 26.4 73.6 24.7 75.3 33.5 66.5 74.3 25.7 SI 16.4 83.6 22.3 77.7 18.1 81.9 21.6 78.4 39.1 60.9 SK 24.2 75.8 26.3 73.7 22.3 77.7 18.9 81.1 36.7 63.3 FI 25.5 74.5 27.3 72.7 28.8 71.2 27.6 72.4 28.9 71.1 SE 30.1 69.9 24.1 75.9 21.4 78.6 21.9 78.1 23.6 76.4 UK 33.2 66.8 35.8 64.2 38.3 61.7 39.4 60.6 49.3 50.7 Source: Eurydice, on the basis of Eurostat/UOE [extracted April 2015] (see Figure 1.2). Country-specific notes Denmark and Estonia: Data includes ISCED level 1. Ireland: Data not available separately for ISCED 2. Hungary: Data includes school management staff. 7

The Teaching Profession in Europe: Practices, Perceptions, and Policies Table 1.3: Proportion by age group of teachers in lower secondary education (ISCED 2), 2013 % <30 years 30-39 years 40-49 years 50-59 years 60 years % <30 years 30-39 years 40-49 years 50-59 years 60 years EU 8.6 25.0 28.3 29.5 8.7 LT 7.3 20.6 29.3 32.8 10.0 BE 18.4 27.9 25.0 26.1 2.5 LU 22.3 38.9 21.9 15.3 1.6 BG 4.2 18.5 31.5 40.3 5.5 HU 5.7 23.0 32.9 36.2 2.2 CZ 8.5 24.9 34.6 27.2 4.7 MT 31.4 36.2 19.0 11.3 2.1 DK 5.2 30.1 28.6 25.3 10.8 NL 14.4 22.7 20.9 30.7 11.4 DE 7.2 19.2 23.2 35.5 14.8 AT 7.3 16.9 27.4 44.8 3.6 EE 7.9 16.8 25.6 31.1 18.5 PL 9.8 35.5 33.1 19.6 2.0 IE : : : : : PT 1.4 25.1 40.6 29.6 3.2 EL 1.5 19.8 41.0 34.4 3.3 RO 16.1 35.2 22.1 19.2 7.4 ES 3.1 25.9 37.1 29.1 4.8 SI 5.9 33.9 27.6 30.2 2.5 FR 8.7 33.3 30.7 22.5 4.7 SK 13.5 28.4 22.4 28.8 6.9 HR : : : : : FI 8.8 30.5 30.6 25.2 4.9 IT 0.1 8.0 28.6 44.1 19.1 SE 6.0 25.0 29.1 24.3 15.6 CY 6.3 41.7 27.5 23.2 1.3 UK 22.1 32.7 23.5 17.6 4.0 LV 5.9 18.0 31.5 34.4 10.2 Source: Eurydice, on the basis of Eurostat/UOE [extracted April 2015] (see Figure 1.3). Table 1.4: Proportion of teachers employed in public-sector and private schools in lower secondary education (ISCED 2), 2013 % EU BE BG CZ DK DE EE IE EL ES FR HR IT CY LV Public 82.3 38.7 97.6 : 84.8 89.0 94.5 : 95.3 71.9 80.8 99.5 94.3 81.6 97.6 Private 17.7 61.3 2.4 : 15.2 11.0 5.5 : 4.7 28.1 19.2 0.5 5.7 18.4 2.4 % LT LU HU MT NL AT PL PT RO SI SK FI SE UK Public 97.6 89.6 84.5 61.6 : 91.6 89.0 89.8 99.4 99.5 91.4 95.4 88.3 31.3 Private 2.4 10.4 15.5 38.4 : 8.4 11.0 10.2 0.6 0.5 8.6 4.6 11.7 68.7 Source: Eurydice, on the basis of Eurostat/UOE [extracted April 2015] (see Figure 1.4). Table 1.5: Proportion of teachers working in public schools, government-dependent private institutions, and private independent institutions in lower secondary education (ISCED 2), 2013 Public Government-dependent Private independent Public Government-dependent Private independent % S.E. % S.E. % S.E. % S.E. % S.E. % S.E. EU 78.2 0.75 15.5 0.7 6.30 0.5 NL 22.1 5.24 77.9 5.2 0.00 0.0 BE nl 26.5 1.30 73.5 1.3 0.00 0.0 PL 94.7 1.37 5.3 1.4 0.00 0.0 BG 99.2 0.58 0.0 0.0 0.79 0.6 PT 88.5 0.95 3.4 0.7 8.12 1.2 CZ 95.7 0.35 3.8 0.5 0.53 0.3 RO 100.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 DK 75.6 2.82 24.4 2.8 0.00 0.0 SK 91.2 1.65 8.8 1.6 0.00 0.0 EE 95.2 1.62 4.1 1.9 0.65 0.4 FI 95.3 1.58 4.0 1.2 0.74 1.0 ES 73.7 1.93 18.2 2.2 8.11 1.9 SE 86.6 1.27 13.4 1.3 0.00 0.0 FR 81.9 1.13 7.8 1.5 10.36 1.7 UK-ENG 51.4 3.93 33.1 3.7 15.48 2.1 HR 98.4 1.12 0.9 0.9 0.74 0.7 IS 98.4 0.00 1.6 0.0 0.00 0.0 IT 95.5 0.21 0.0 0.0 4.54 0.2 NO 94.6 3.12 5.4 3.1 0.00 0.0 CY 80.3 0.11 0.0 0.0 19.72 0.1 RS 100.0 0.00 0.0 0.0 0.00 0.0 LV 98.6 1.46 0.3 0.3 1.01 1.4 Source: Eurydice, on the basis of TALIS 2013. Data calculated on the basis of questionstc2g10 and TC2G11A. The response to item 1 (publicly-managed) of question TC2G10 defines the school as public. The combination of item 2 (privately-managed) of question TC2G10 with one of the options available (yes or no) in question TC2G11A defines the private institution as government-dependent or private independent (see Glossary) 8

Appendix Table 1.6: Proportion of teachers working in public schools, government-dependent private institutions, and private independent institutions, according to age groups in lower secondary education (ISCED 2), 2013 <30 30-39 40-49 50-59 >60 A B C A B C A B C A B C A B C % S.E. % S.E. % S.E. % S.E. % S.E. % S.E. % S.E. % S.E. % S.E. % S.E. % S.E. % S.E. % S.E. % S.E. % S.E. EU 66.3 1.97 27.0 1.83 6.6 0.81 76.0 1.17 16.7 0.97 7.2 1.05 80.0 0.75 13.4 0.74 6.6 0.64 81.3 0.73 13.3 0.74 5.3 0.41 83.3 1.26 12.5 1.10 4.3 0.83 BE nl 27.7 2.10 72.3 2.10 0.0 0.00 29.1 1.88 70.9 1.88 0.0 0.00 23.2 1.77 76.8 1.77 0.0 0.00 24.7 2.17 75.3 2.17 0.0 0.00 39.6 11.98 60.4 11.98 0.0 0.00 BG 97.1 2.89 0.0 0.00 2.9 2.89 99.1 0.67 0.0 0.00 0.9 0.67 98.9 0.98 0.0 0.00 1.1 0.98 99.7 0.22 0.0 0.00 0.3 0.22 99.2 0.85 0.0 0.00 0.8 0.85 CZ 93.4 1.22 6.1 1.26 0.5 0.31 94.4 0.52 4.8 0.71 0.7 0.41 95.6 0.37 3.7 0.48 0.7 0.37 97.3 0.54 2.5 0.56 0.3 0.17 98.0 0.58 1.7 0.65 0.3 0.16 DK 55.8 7.27 44.2 7.27 0.0 0.00 75.2 3.16 24.8 3.16 0.0 0.00 76.9 3.43 23.1 3.43 0.0 0.00 75.7 3.76 24.3 3.76 0.0 0.00 83.7 3.41 16.3 3.41 0.0 0.00 EE 94.3 2.54 4.9 2.81 0.8 0.53 93.7 2.03 5.4 2.37 1.0 0.67 94.6 1.52 4.6 1.71 0.8 0.46 95.4 2.01 4.1 2.28 0.5 0.29 97.9 1.17 1.7 1.11 0.4 0.39 ES 38.5 7.09 38.8 7.13 22.7 8.32 66.1 3.25 23.9 3.56 10.0 2.62 74.5 1.96 17.3 2.31 8.2 2.13 82.5 2.04 12.7 2.03 4.8 1.39 63.2 5.34 23.1 5.08 13.7 4.28 FR 83.0 3.26 6.5 1.64 10.6 3.28 85.2 1.52 6.9 1.62 7.9 1.60 81.6 1.66 7.1 1.51 11.3 2.08 76.6 2.19 10.5 2.16 12.9 2.11 82.0 4.34 8.9 3.27 9.0 3.18 HR 98.6 1.41 0.0 0.00 1.4 1.41 97.9 1.48 1.1 1.11 1.0 1.00 98.0 1.50 1.4 1.34 0.7 0.68 98.9 0.83 0.8 0.78 0.3 0.28 99.6 0.37 0.4 0.37 0.0 0.00 IT 65.7 7.82 0.0 0.00 34.3 7.82 89.0 1.38 0.0 0.00 11.0 1.38 96.1 0.36 0.0 0.00 3.9 0.36 98.0 0.25 0.0 0.00 2.0 0.25 96.3 1.35 0.0 0.00 3.7 1.35 CY 16.7 3.76 0.0 0.00 83.3 3.76 74.3 1.26 0.0 0.00 25.7 1.26 89.4 1.11 0.0 0.00 10.6 1.11 94.7 0.87 0.0 0.00 5.3 0.87 79.0 6.26 0.0 0.00 21.0 6.26 LV 95.6 4.15 1.6 1.62 2.8 3.88 98.4 1.66 0.5 0.51 1.1 1.59 98.9 1.19 0.3 0.26 0.8 1.16 98.7 1.51 0.3 0.30 1.0 1.48 99.5 0.73 0.0 0.00 0.5 0.73 NL 27.2 7.72 72.8 7.72 0.0 0.00 19.0 4.54 81.0 4.54 0.0 0.00 23.9 5.95 76.1 5.95 0.0 0.00 19.7 4.70 80.3 4.70 0.0 0.00 24.1 5.97 75.9 5.97 0.0 0.00 PL 91.0 4.52 9.0 4.52 0.0 0.00 94.5 1.20 5.5 1.20 0.0 0.00 96.1 0.72 3.9 0.72 0.0 0.00 95.5 1.92 4.5 1.92 0.0 0.00 78.2 10.53 21.8 10.53 0.0 0.00 PT 52.1 12.71 15.0 7.95 32.9 13.33 79.6 1.72 6.4 1.91 14.0 2.66 91.0 1.46 2.6 0.75 6.4 1.35 94.6 1.11 1.3 0.47 4.1 1.07 80.1 4.69 6.3 2.54 13.6 4.16 RO 100 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 100 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 100 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 100 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 100 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 SK 86.9 3.07 13.1 3.07 0.0 0.00 89.4 2.04 10.6 2.04 0.0 0.00 91.0 1.91 9.0 1.91 0.0 0.00 94.5 1.36 5.5 1.36 0.0 0.00 94.8 1.47 5.2 1.47 0.0 0.00 FI 97.2 1.55 2.8 1.55 0.0 0.00 93.7 2.56 5.3 2.13 1.0 1.46 96.4 1.29 3.1 1.09 0.5 0.68 95.3 1.84 3.8 1.32 0.9 1.28 94.4 1.72 4.7 1.07 0.9 1.30 SE 65.6 5.87 34.4 5.87 0.0 0.00 86.4 1.65 13.6 1.65 0.0 0.00 86.9 1.52 13.1 1.52 0.0 0.00 88.5 2.07 11.5 2.07 0.0 0.00 90.7 2.32 9.3 2.32 0.0 0.00 UK-ENG 56.0 4.56 35.5 4.47 8.5 1.22 52.6 4.55 31.6 3.87 15.7 4.32 49.2 4.35 33.1 4.21 17.7 2.39 46.6 3.90 32.6 3.72 20.9 1.56 50.4 8.56 39.4 8.31 10.2 6.69 IS 99.0 1.02 1.0 1.02 0.0 0.00 97.7 0.66 2.3 0.66 0.0 0.00 98.9 0.33 1.1 0.33 0.0 0.00 98.9 0.64 1.1 0.64 0.0 0.00 97.6 1.59 2.4 1.59 0.0 0.00 NO 95.2 3.40 4.8 3.40 0.0 0.00 91.8 4.80 8.2 4.80 0.0 0.00 94.2 4.19 5.8 4.19 0.0 0.00 95.7 2.55 4.3 2.55 0.0 0.00 99.0 1.05 1.0 1.05 0.0 0.00 RS 100 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 100 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 100 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 100 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 100 0.00 0.0 0.00 0.0 0.00 A Public-sector schools B Government-dependent private institutions C Private independent institutions Source: Eurydice, on the basis of TALIS 2013. Data calculated on the basis of questionstc2g10 and TC2G11A. The response to item 1 (publicly-managed) of question TC2G10 defines the school as public. The combination of item 2 (privately-managed) of question TC2G10 with one of the options available (yes or no) in question TC2G11A defines the private institution as government-dependent or private independent (see Glossary) 9

The Teaching Profession in Europe: Practices, Perceptions, and Policies INITIAL TEACHER EDUCATION AND TRANSITION TO THE PROFESSION Table 2.1: Proportion of teachers in lower secondary (ISCED 2), by highest qualification level achieved and current age group, 2013 Non-tertiary level (below ISCED 5) TOTAL 2.0 2.6 1.0 4.4 2.1 5.2 3.4 0.9 0.0 3.6 0.0 1.4 4.1 0.1 0.3 1.2 1.6 1.1 3.8 1.4 10.0 2.0 1.6 S.E. 0.09 0.31 0.23 0.44 0.45 0.50 0.31 0.18 0.00 0.37 0.00 0.30 0.77 0.04 0.12 0.30 0.31 0.20 0.37 0.30 0.91 0.42 0.26 < 30 years 2.1 1.5 2.8 10.4 10.7 13.1 2.0 0.2 0.0 8.4 0.0 1.8 9.3 0.0 0.0 2.7 0.8 2.8 11.4 0.8 8.5 4.8 1.3 S.E. 0.25 0.49 2.28 1.98 3.19 2.26 0.45 0.15 0.00 4.57 0.00 0.90 2.12 0.04 0.04 1.13 0.42 1.34 3.31 0.31 3.05 2.09 0.39 30-39 years 0.9 2.4 0.3 4.5 1.6 3.6 3.3 2.0 0.0 0.9 0.0 1.1 2.5 0.2 0.5 0.5 1.2 1.1 2.1 1.4 3.0 2.1 1.2 S.E. 0.12 0.61 0.18 0.80 0.60 0.78 0.48 0.59 0.00 0.53 0.00 0.23 0.58 0.17 0.24 0.36 0.45 0.39 0.54 0.66 0.86 0.74 0.42 40-49 years 1.5 4.1 0.7 4.7 1.5 5.5 4.3 8.1 0.0 0.4 0.0 0.5 4.4 0.2 1.9 1.2 3.7 0.9 3.5 2.9 7.5 2.5 0.7 S.E. 0.14 0.64 0.34 0.90 0.57 0.88 0.74 2.45 0.00 0.20 0.00 0.21 1.90 0.17 1.42 0.49 0.99 0.31 0.62 1.21 1.26 0.90 0.35 50-59 years 2.9 2.7 1.0 2.6 2.1 4.5 7.3 8.1 0.0 4.4 0.0 0.7 2.5 0.2 1.9 2.0 0.7 1.0 4.8 7.8 7.8 0.9 0.9 S.E. 0.25 0.65 0.36 0.66 0.54 0.80 2.39 2.45 0.00 0.64 0.00 0.70 0.76 0.17 1.42 1.03 0.48 0.37 0.83 3.24 1.56 0.24 0.60 60 years 6.5 2.1 3.3 1.2 2.1 3.8 7.3 8.1 0.0 13.8 0.0 0.7 2.8 0.2 1.9 0.5 0.7 0.5 3.3 7.8 45.2 0.4 0.9 S.E. 0.60 2.14 1.81 0.87 0.54 0.81 2.39 2.45 0.00 1.88 0.00 0.70 1.41 0.17 1.42 0.35 0.48 0.52 1.00 3.24 4.55 0.39 0.60 Occupation-oriented tertiary level (ISCED 5B) TOTAL 5.4 85.4 7.8 1.9 0.6 5.9 1.0 3.6 17.7 15.8 0.7 1.5 0.7 0.0 2.4 5.4 0.2 2.9 7.7 1.7 4.7 0.0 15.5 S.E. 0.12 0.80 0.75 0.27 0.17 0.46 0.19 0.38 0.77 0.61 0.16 0.33 0.22 0.03 0.24 0.52 0.09 0.39 0.49 0.27 0.47 0.00 0.77 < 30 years 3.6 82.8 3.3 1.4 0.9 2.5 0.2 0.5 0.9 2.0 0.4 2.5 0.4 0.2 0.9 0.2 0.4 1.7 3.3 0.3 1.3 0.0 4.6 S.E. 0.19 1.58 1.91 0.71 0.94 0.94 0.11 0.47 0.36 2.01 0.25 0.93 0.27 0.17 0.25 0.18 0.29 0.99 1.47 0.14 0.61 0.00 0.69 30-39 years 2.5 87.4 2.9 1.8 0.3 8.9 0.8 0.7 4.8 8.4 0.9 1.2 0.5 0.1 5.8 0.6 0.1 1.3 2.5 1.5 5.2 0.0 8.1 S.E. 0.13 1.34 0.87 0.51 0.25 1.24 0.29 0.27 0.90 1.20 0.46 0.43 0.32 0.06 0.70 0.31 0.08 0.41 0.70 0.55 0.88 0.00 0.93 40-49 years 4.7 85.6 6.1 2.1 0.7 7.0 1.4 2.8 35.4 16.7 0.8 1.7 1.1 0.1 18.3 4.2 0.1 3.5 4.5 5.7 9.3 0.0 27.2 S.E. 0.25 1.39 1.10 0.51 0.42 0.93 0.32 0.62 2.32 1.28 0.34 0.48 0.74 0.06 5.09 1.11 0.08 0.64 0.69 1.54 1.64 0.00 2.17 50-59 years 8.9 85.5 11.2 2.0 0.8 5.0 5.2 9.2 76.3 19.9 1.9 1.1 0.9 0.1 18.3 12.3 0.1 4.1 13.2 8.2 4.0 0.0 60.1 S.E. 0.34 1.39 1.13 0.52 0.43 0.74 2.50 1.16 2.11 1.09 1.87 0.81 0.50 0.06 5.09 1.89 0.08 0.84 1.25 3.57 1.64 0.00 2.70 60 years 10.9 85.0 11.7 1.4 0.4 4.0 5.2 9.3 76.3 10.7 1.9 1.1 0.1 0.1 18.3 22.6 0.1 4.2 16.6 8.2 4.0 0.0 60.1 S.E. 0.76 8.58 2.77 0.71 0.44 0.95 2.50 2.85 2.11 1.48 1.87 0.81 0.11 0.06 5.09 3.32 0.08 1.97 2.04 3.57 1.64 0.00 2.70 Academic tertiary level (at least ISCED 5A) TOTAL 92.5 11.9 91.2 93.7 97.3 88.9 95.6 95.5 82.3 80.5 99.3 97.1 95.2 99.9 97.2 93.4 98.2 96.0 88.5 96.9 85.3 98.0 82.8 S.E. 0.14 0.76 0.79 0.56 0.49 0.69 0.34 0.42 0.77 0.64 0.16 0.41 0.75 0.05 0.25 0.64 0.32 0.44 0.69 0.39 0.97 0.42 0.83 < 30 years 94.3 15.8 93.9 88.2 88.3 84.4 100 99.5 96.5 89.6 100 90.5 90.4 99.8 100 97.0 99.1 95.6 85.4 99.3 89.4 95.2 89.2 S.E. 0.31 1.61 2.94 2.09 3.07 2.38 0.00 0.47 0.74 4.82 0.00 3.45 2.12 0.17 0.00 1.15 0.80 1.58 3.33 0.34 3.40 2.09 1.71 30-39 years 96.6 10.3 96.8 93.7 98.1 87.5 97.8 99.3 99.1 90.7 99.6 95.8 97.1 99.9 98.9 98.9 99.2 97.6 95.5 98.9 95.7 97.9 94.1 S.E. 0.17 1.20 0.89 1.05 0.60 1.41 0.45 0.27 0.36 1.32 0.25 1.22 0.66 0.07 0.44 0.47 0.42 0.55 0.77 0.33 0.99 0.74 0.84 40-49 years 93.8 10.3 93.2 93.2 97.8 87.4 95.9 96.9 95.2 82.9 99.1 97.8 94.5 100 99.1 94.6 98.4 95.6 92.0 97.1 87.4 97.5 90.7 S.E. 0.30 1.39 1.11 1.08 0.75 1.25 0.49 0.63 0.90 1.26 0.46 0.48 2.03 0.00 0.25 1.21 0.54 0.71 0.85 0.87 1.66 0.90 1.08 50-59 years 88.2 11.8 87.8 95.4 97.0 90.5 94.2 88.8 64.6 75.6 99.2 97.8 96.6 99.8 93.7 85.7 96.2 94.9 82.0 91.4 83.0 99.1 72.1 S.E. 0.40 1.33 1.17 0.84 0.74 1.10 0.81 1.32 2.32 1.18 0.34 0.53 0.79 0.17 0.74 2.16 0.99 0.96 1.45 1.84 2.23 0.24 2.10 60 years 82.6 12.9 85.1 97.4 99.6 92.2 87.5 82.6 23.7 75.5 98.1 98.2 97.1 100 79.8 77.0 99.3 95.3 80.1 84.1 50.8 99.6 39.1 S.E. 0.87 8.45 3.43 1.13 0.44 1.20 3.15 3.07 2.11 2.16 1.87 1.08 1.41 0.00 5.35 3.34 0.48 2.04 2.19 4.98 4.46 0.39 2.81 Source: Eurydice, on the basis of TALIS 2013. s Data calculated on the basis of the answers to the questions TT2G10 and TT2G02. Data collected and presented on the basis of ISCED 1997. Table 2.2: Proportion of teachers in lower secondary education (ISCED 2) who have completed ITE, 2013 EU BE nl BG CZ DK EE ES FR HR IT CY LV NL PL PT RO SK FI SE UK-ENG IS NO RS % 91.2 98.3 97.7 76.7 93.5 94.4 97.5 90.1 94.9 79.1 89.7 90.8 91.5 99.4 82.1 97.1 89.4 92.5 89.9 91.9 92.4 92.5 71.4 S.E. 0.20 0.26 0.32 0.79 0.87 0.44 0.33 0.52 0.48 0.81 0.64 0.80 1.10 0.14 0.76 0.42 0.69 0.66 0.68 0.64 0.67 0.89 0.96 Source: Eurydice, on the basis of TALIS 2013 (see Figure 2.2). Data calculated on the basis of the answers to question TT2G11. Country-specific note Cyprus: The proportion of teachers, who have completed an ITE programme, is substantially higher 96.9 % (0.51) among those working in the public sector. 10

Appendix Table 2.3: Proportion of teachers in lower secondary education (ISCED 2) who have completed ITE, by age group, 2013 < 30 years 89.3 98.3 94.3 71.7 81.7 79.0 96.9 86.0 94.1 45.4 50.9 75.6 82.5 99.2 60.8 93.4 81.6 90.3 81.1 91.7 81.2 85.0 49.8 S.E. 0.77 0.48 2.48 2.57 3.34 3.18 1.76 2.70 1.25 8.06 4.24 4.60 2.71 0.60 9.01 1.76 2.06 2.21 3.74 1.30 3.80 3.06 2.58 30-39 years 92.1 98.4 96.7 76.9 93.9 93.1 96.6 92.5 94.4 74.0 88.6 93.5 90.9 99.3 75.9 98.4 87.1 93.5 91.7 93.0 91.0 93.5 74.8 S.E. 0.39 0.30 0.88 1.72 1.04 1.02 0.74 0.80 0.73 2.31 1.10 1.35 1.53 0.27 1.38 0.56 1.24 1.17 1.08 1.52 1.40 1.14 1.39 40-49 years 91.2 98.6 98.4 74.8 93.8 96.0 97.3 91.8 94.9 77.2 94.8 92.3 91.9 99.6 83.7 98.1 92.6 93.5 88.9 91.3 94.4 92.3 77.9 S.E. 0.38 0.50 0.52 1.48 1.57 0.78 0.50 0.91 0.82 1.35 0.95 1.11 2.00 0.18 1.09 0.65 1.18 0.93 1.19 1.19 1.05 1.31 1.89 50-59 years 90.7 98.1 97.9 80.5 94.5 96.6 98.4 86.4 95.6 80.5 95.4 89.5 95.8 99.5 85.3 96.2 90.9 91.3 89.8 90.0 91.9 95.2 73.0 S.E. 0.38 0.47 0.39 1.57 1.14 0.59 0.50 1.30 1.05 1.25 1.02 1.36 0.96 0.29 1.27 0.80 1.16 1.26 1.29 1.50 1.48 1.17 1.97 60 years 92.3 85.2 97.4 76.3 95.9 95.5 97.3 84.7 96.1 90.1 96.1 93.0 95.8 97.2 94.4 97.3 94.5 90.1 92.2 98.6 97.8 93.2 62.4 S.E. 0.71 8.91 1.29 3.28 1.63 0.90 1.52 2.84 1.00 1.77 2.87 1.64 1.38 2.98 2.32 1.08 1.63 2.51 1.47 1.39 1.28 1.85 3.00 Source: Eurydice, on the basis of TALIS 2013. Data calculated on the basis of the answers to questions TT2G02 and TT2G11. Table 2.4: Proportion of teachers in lower secondary education (ISCED 2) who have completed ITE, by subject taught, 2013 A 91.9 99.2 99.2 78.3 95.7 95.9 98.1 91.1 97.3 82.7 90.9 91.3 93.8 99.4 81.7 98.2 91.3 90.4 94.1 93.1 93.5 93.9 76.1 S.E. 0.38 0.27 0.51 1.62 1.02 0.84 0.64 1.01 0.68 1.25 1.17 1.85 1.81 0.36 1.51 0.59 1.19 1.70 0.89 1.13 1.16 1.19 2.13 B 90.6 99.1 98.4 81.5 92.7 96.4 96.9 89.9 94.8 79.7 87.1 94.1 92.7 99.8 75.8 95.6 92.2 89.3 90.9 90.9 91.2 93.5 69.0 S.E. 0.42 0.29 0.65 1.73 1.46 0.99 0.67 1.21 1.11 1.77 2.33 1.51 2.03 0.16 2.34 1.40 1.23 1.52 1.16 1.56 1.38 0.97 2.59 C 90.6 99.5 98.3 79.8 95.4 95.9 98.1 88.4 95.1 79.0 82.5 88.7 89.5 99.0 80.9 95.5 91.3 91.4 90.7 93.0 93.7 93.3 70.0 S.E. 0.43 0.32 0.71 1.34 0.98 0.80 0.52 1.50 0.75 1.78 2.59 1.97 2.31 0.56 1.55 1.10 1.00 1.20 1.32 1.53 1.64 1.20 2.00 D 91.4 99.2 98.5 77.7 93.6 96.6 98.8 89.6 97.1 78.5 87.6 89.0 89.9 100.0 88.4 98.9 90.0 90.6 92.7 95.1 93.5 92.7 74.3 S.E. 0.41 0.37 0.23 1.30 1.39 0.87 0.61 1.50 0.84 1.74 2.00 2.22 2.20 0.00 1.75 0.50 1.10 1.57 1.15 1.14 1.55 1.57 2.53 E 91.0 98.8 94.9 74.9 94.5 96.2 97.6 87.9 96.5 81.0 89.2 89.4 92.3 99.1 83.9 98.0 88.9 91.8 90.7 93.5 93.7 92.8 71.0 S.E. 0.41 0.48 1.08 1.45 1.01 0.85 0.72 1.20 0.89 1.64 1.82 1.91 1.86 0.45 1.69 0.89 1.10 1.43 1.04 2.32 1.01 1.56 1.82 Source: Eurydice, on the basis of TALIS 2013. A Reading, writing and literature B Mathematics C Science D Social studies E Modern foreign languages Data calculated on the basis of the answers to questions TT2G11 and TT2G15A to TT2G15E. Table 2.5: Proportion of teachers in lower secondary education (ISCED 2) who have completed an ITE programme that includes teaching content, theory and practice, 2013 EU BE nl BG CZ DK EE ES FR HR IT CY LV NL PL PT RO SK FI SE UK-ENG IS NO RS % 80.0 90.2 92.7 88.5 94.6 87.8 63.2 74.8 91.2 53.3 87.5 91.5 91.6 94.5 88.8 91.3 79.2 95.4 92.4 92.1 79.9 92.3 75.5 S.E. 0.32 0.68 0.65 0.79 0.66 0.57 0.91 1.00 0.64 1.12 0.92 0.71 0.67 0.50 0.63 0.68 0.98 0.38 0.69 0.59 1.01 0.49 1.07 Source: Eurydice, on the basis of TALIS 2013 (see Figure 2.3). Data calculated on the basis of the answers to questions TT2G11 and TT2G12. Only teachers having answered either 'Yes, for all subject(s) I teach' or 'Yes, for some subject(s) I teach' in question TT2G12 to the three sub-questions (TT2G12A to TT2G12C) are taken into account. Table 2.6: Proportion, by age group, of teachers in lower secondary education (ISCED 2) who have completed an ITE programme that includes teaching content, theory and practice, 2013 < 30 years 90.7 93.4 93.3 93.6 98.4 87.4 57.6 76.8 94.5 77.9 75.3 95.5 96.6 97.8 97.2 94.3 87.8 95.8 97.7 95.3 80.5 95.3 74.5 S.E. 0.79 1.07 3.23 1.77 1.62 2.22 6.03 3.28 1.26 11.23 4.94 1.36 1.04 0.72 2.87 1.58 2.22 1.43 1.63 1.17 4.92 1.18 4.08 30-39 years 87.6 90.9 91.5 92.6 94.9 89.7 66.7 83.4 93.9 88.3 88.0 92.7 95.3 95.9 92.8 92.3 80.4 96.7 95.5 92.6 78.7 91.3 77.5 S.E. 0.45 1.10 1.26 1.02 1.09 1.34 1.69 1.31 0.77 1.84 1.56 1.59 1.07 0.65 0.97 0.93 1.67 0.66 0.86 1.27 1.99 1.30 1.74 40-49 years 78.9 88.6 93.5 87.5 95.4 87.4 61.2 77.4 91.5 57.4 89.3 92.3 92.4 94.9 90.2 90.7 77.7 94.2 95.8 90.4 83.7 93.4 71.6 S.E. 0.58 1.39 1.07 1.68 1.03 1.20 1.38 1.68 1.07 2.26 1.49 1.04 1.78 0.80 0.88 1.39 1.53 0.87 0.73 1.31 1.66 1.07 1.94 50-59 years 71.6 87.6 92.5 85.0 93.0 87.5 62.9 58.9 86.6 40.5 86.8 91.3 90.6 91.2 82.8 89.3 75.9 95.3 88.9 89.8 77.9 94.1 81.3 S.E. 0.72 1.42 0.90 1.44 1.71 1.07 1.70 1.73 1.54 2.03 1.76 1.24 1.53 1.26 1.40 1.59 1.78 0.96 1.32 1.99 2.96 1.23 1.98 60 years 69.0 93.5 93.0 84.7 93.3 87.5 69.8 57.3 85.5 41.3 83.6 86.3 72.4 83.4 84.0 87.4 78.7 96.0 83.2 90.1 74.9 88.1 65.4 S.E. 1.21 4.73 1.73 2.99 1.78 1.56 4.60 4.57 1.82 3.24 6.96 2.83 4.91 6.20 4.08 2.80 3.07 1.65 2.19 4.72 4.41 1.97 3.46 Source: Eurydice, on the basis of TALIS 2013. Data calculated on the basis of the answers to question TT2G02, TT2G11, and TT2G12. Only teachers having answered either 'Yes, for all subject(s) I teach' or 'Yes, for some subject(s) I teach' in question TT2G12 to the three sub-questions (TT2G12A to TT2G12C) are taken into account. 11

The Teaching Profession in Europe: Practices, Perceptions, and Policies Table 2.7: Proportion, by subject taught, of teachers in lower secondary education (ISCED 2) who have completed an ITE programme that includes teaching content, theory and practice, 2013 A 79.6 93.5 94.6 91.8 95.1 88.6 63.3 71.6 93.9 56.1 86.2 92.2 94.1 97.1 94.1 93.7 79.7 93.3 92.2 93.8 80.4 92.8 83.6 S.E. 0.60 0.93 1.22 1.37 0.79 1.52 1.77 2.04 0.79 1.99 1.66 1.28 1.79 0.78 1.02 1.22 1.85 0.97 1.02 1.23 1.84 0.68 1.97 B 77.5 92.7 94.3 88.7 95.3 90.7 62.6 71.1 92.3 50.4 84.5 95.3 91.6 91.9 91.7 91.6 80.7 93.4 92.1 91.5 80.8 93.2 72.2 S.E. 0.70 1.35 1.16 1.74 1.25 1.69 2.10 2.29 1.47 2.12 2.79 1.17 2.31 1.83 1.39 1.70 1.63 0.91 1.11 1.33 1.81 1.07 2.70 C 79.2 94.3 96.8 88.5 94.4 89.3 58.5 74.5 90.7 50.5 87.8 92.0 91.0 94.7 90.1 89.9 81.2 95.6 95.2 94.3 83.2 92.9 74.5 S.E. 0.64 1.17 0.88 1.25 1.11 1.66 2.52 2.41 1.34 2.18 2.54 1.75 2.27 1.16 1.27 1.65 1.63 0.63 0.93 1.23 2.19 1.48 1.99 D 80.6 93.1 93.1 88.5 95.1 88.0 67.1 71.2 92.6 54.6 88.3 91.3 89.8 94.1 85.9 94.2 78.7 93.3 93.1 91.8 78.5 94.0 80.1 S.E. 0.63 1.22 1.51 1.31 1.24 1.41 2.00 2.89 1.40 2.60 2.29 1.85 2.14 1.37 1.61 1.60 1.70 1.10 1.05 1.57 2.30 0.71 2.34 E 80.9 93.5 92.3 89.3 94.7 87.1 66.4 75.4 94.5 56.8 92.4 93.3 87.1 96.8 93.4 91.6 80.9 94.0 93.1 90.9 74.0 93.2 75.3 S.E. 0.67 1.18 1.30 1.11 1.02 1.36 2.23 2.13 1.04 2.24 1.90 1.87 1.76 0.75 1.07 1.45 1.56 0.90 0.89 2.56 2.15 0.91 2.66 Source: Eurydice, on the basis of TALIS 2013. A Reading, writing and literature B Mathematics C Science D Social studies E Modern foreign languages Data calculated on the basis of the answers to questions TT2G11, TTG12, and TT2G15A to TTG15E. Only teachers having answered either 'Yes, for all subject(s) I teach' or 'Yes, for some subject(s) I teach' in question TT2G12 to the three sub-questions (TT2G12A to TT2G12C) are taken into account. Table 2.8: The feeling of readiness among teachers in lower secondary education (ISCED 2) for work based on the content, theory and practice of teaching, depending on whether or not they have completed ITE, 2013 Content Theory Practice ITE completed ITE not completed ITE completed ITE not completed ITE completed ITE not completed % S.E. S.E. S.E. S.E. S.E. S.E. S.E. S.E. S.E. S.E. S.E. S.E. EU 62.3 0.33 33.2 0.31 47.6 1.11 45.0 1.26 41.4 0.40 46.4 0.46 27.5 0.97 50.8 0.98 46.4 0.37 41.1 0.40 31.9 1.01 47.9 1.09 BE nl 55.4 1.06 40.2 0.99 49.2 7.28 43.9 6.48 37.9 1.25 54.9 1.19 22.2 5.73 58.2 7.31 38.9 1.09 51.3 0.92 42.1 8.29 40.8 7.44 BG 67.2 1.20 25.0 1.11 52.0 7.90 36.3 7.75 55.7 1.49 33.9 1.43 31.1 6.92 21.2 6.67 57.8 1.39 30.0 1.22 42.7 7.18 18.1 5.50 CZ 60.1 1.06 38.5 1.03 52.8 1.90 45.6 1.96 42.5 1.24 49.2 1.15 32.2 2.01 58.7 2.04 46.9 1.01 42.4 1.01 41.6 1.63 47.6 2.05 DK 48.8 1.61 44.0 1.60 50.0 6.14 40.9 4.84 34.6 1.44 50.5 1.58 30.8 5.96 45.4 5.25 45.7 1.35 42.4 1.35 41.4 5.98 44.8 4.87 EE 77.3 1.20 20.6 1.09 67.4 3.82 30.3 3.70 62.1 1.22 35.4 1.16 39.6 4.00 48.1 4.25 60.3 1.07 34.3 1.07 43.7 3.57 36.7 3.72 ES 75.3 1.01 23.6 0.96 61.9 7.23 36.5 7.35 36.9 1.00 54.5 0.92 26.5 5.54 57.4 6.62 45.7 1.05 46.9 1.08 42.1 6.08 51.0 6.36 FR 45.4 1.13 45.9 1.08 33.6 2.74 49.6 2.91 12.2 0.69 49.7 1.15 8.4 2.05 38.1 2.89 11.7 0.65 47.6 0.94 7.8 1.70 37.5 2.45 HR 77.6 0.81 20.7 0.78 79.3 3.47 18.1 3.40 52.6 0.91 40.3 0.86 38.6 4.09 45.1 3.75 55.8 0.96 33.9 0.85 40.6 4.31 40.1 3.79 IT 40.9 1.16 55.0 1.15 36.9 2.17 57.9 2.45 31.6 1.14 60.8 1.17 21.6 1.74 60.4 1.82 35.5 1.22 57.1 1.25 24.9 1.91 61.2 2.12 CY 85.6 0.88 13.4 0.85 85.6 2.69 12.2 2.41 65.8 1.19 31.3 1.16 51.6 3.44 41.2 3.82 73.9 1.23 23.0 1.15 55.5 3.63 39.6 3.71 LV 55.0 1.16 43.6 1.13 48.0 3.17 50.4 3.25 43.1 1.27 54.1 1.27 28.9 3.42 65.5 3.83 42.6 1.25 53.2 1.40 34.2 3.50 56.0 4.07 NL 45.0 1.43 48.2 1.40 44.7 4.94 46.3 5.76 29.0 1.17 56.9 1.61 21.4 2.98 57.8 5.19 34.8 1.36 47.6 1.28 21.9 5.45 48.6 5.28 PL 75.5 1.17 22.9 0.91 71.1 9.42 28.9 9.42 64.4 1.11 33.1 0.89 24.8 8.72 68.5 9.29 66.6 1.10 29.1 0.79 48.4 12.41 45.2 12.37 PT 70.9 0.84 27.2 0.83 65.5 2.19 32.9 2.10 48.6 1.04 46.4 1.02 44.2 1.97 50.4 1.90 51.8 1.10 43.5 1.05 44.7 2.21 49.7 2.05 RO 84.3 1.13 15.5 1.13 60.1 6.04 39.9 6.04 65.3 1.40 33.5 1.34 44.2 6.57 45.9 6.79 75.3 1.15 23.2 1.08 44.4 6.74 39.2 7.21 SK 72.5 1.07 26.7 1.05 58.9 2.94 38.7 2.90 56.3 1.10 41.5 1.06 38.0 2.97 54.6 3.34 57.7 1.24 38.3 1.26 43.7 3.25 45.4 3.56 FI 26.2 1.01 46.4 1.13 20.4 2.94 47.2 3.29 16.1 0.76 49.3 1.02 8.7 2.23 37.1 3.37 22.6 0.87 45.2 1.01 10.6 2.39 31.6 3.11 SE 64.4 1.19 32.7 1.09 57.2 3.30 37.6 3.32 46.7 1.14 44.3 1.08 30.6 3.43 49.1 3.04 55.2 1.18 35.1 1.04 48.0 3.14 41.0 2.69 UK-ENG 68.2 0.98 25.2 0.88 64.4 3.29 25.9 3.04 54.1 1.07 36.8 1.43 49.3 4.24 37.5 3.02 61.9 1.06 31.2 1.12 54.6 3.98 34.5 4.15 IS 45.5 1.28 38.1 1.31 30.9 5.32 46.6 5.50 34.4 1.23 45.5 1.49 14.0 4.34 46.6 5.11 44.9 1.25 34.9 1.27 20.9 3.80 39.1 4.93 NO 38.4 1.16 55.2 1.18 38.8 5.59 46.6 5.38 26.8 1.45 63.2 1.18 23.0 4.11 48.5 5.61 35.5 1.35 57.3 1.51 22.2 4.14 48.2 5.83 RS 83.6 0.82 15.2 0.81 77.9 1.43 21.3 1.47 65.0 1.35 32.4 1.28 60.3 1.94 35.1 1.85 69.0 1.34 28.9 1.32 65.3 1.71 31.8 1.60 Source: Eurydice, on the basis of TALIS 2013 (see Figure 2.4). Teachers' feeling of readiness: Very Well: Well: Data calculated on the basis of the answers to question TT2G11 and the answers 'well' and 'very well' to question TT2G13. 12

Appendix Table 2.9: Proportion of teachers with no more than five years of experience in lower secondary education (ISCED 2) who took part in formal induction programmes as newcomers to teaching, 2013 EU BE nl BG CZ DK EE ES FR HR IT CY LV NL PL PT RO SK FI SE UK-ENG IS NO RS % 59.9 67.8 81.1 37.2 39.9 28.1 35.5 67.5 68.0 18.6 47.7 26.2 64.5 32.7 31.6 48.0 58.7 22.2 21.9 92.9 23.2 27.5 55.6 S.E. 0.97 1.89 3.39 2.70 2.99 3.00 5.08 2.63 1.90 2.27 3.58 4.54 3.84 2.86 4.91 2.88 2.30 2.49 2.32 1.11 2.77 4.09 2.31 Source: Eurydice, on the basis of TALIS 2013 (see Figure 2.6). Data calculated on the basis of the answers to question TT2G19A and TT2G05B. Table 2.10: The predictive value of certain selected factors in participation by teachers in lower secondary education (ISCED 2) in induction programmes, as newcomers to their profession, 2013 Odds ratios EU BE nl BG CZ DK EE ES FR HR IT CY LV NL PL PT RO SK FI SE UK-ENG IS NO RS A 1.4 4.2 1.4 0.6 2.3 0.8 2.1 1.3 0.7 2.4 0.8 0.8 1.4 3.6 1.6 1.6 B 1.6 1.6 2.2 1.5 0.6 1.9 3.9 4 C 1.2 2.6 0.8 1.8 1.3 0.7 1.2 0.6 1.9 1.5 D 1.7 1.3 1.4 1.6 1.4 1.3 1.3 1.4 2.3 E 2.4 1.4 12.9 1.5 14.5 1.3 1.3 5.3 F 2 1.5 1.4 1.5 G 1.3 1.4 A Teachers aged no more than 40 years D An induction programme for new teachers is available at their school F Location in a city (over 15 000 inhabitants) B Teachers with no more than 5 years of teaching experience E Teachers have permanent employee status G High school enrolment (over 400 pupils) C Teachers with no more than 5 years of experience at their school Source: Eurydice, based on OECD, TALIS 2013 (see Figure 2.7). s Odds ratios for each of the predicting factors are considered under the control of all others. For further explanation on multiple logistic regressions, see the Statistical Note. The odds ratios associated with the predicting factors represent the increase likelihood of having participated to an induction programme as a newcomer to the profession according to the score to the question. Only significant values are indicated in the table. The analysis is based on combining the 'participation to an induction programme as a new teacher' factor (answers to questions TT2G19A) to 7 selected factors. A Answers to question TT2G02 C Answers to question TT2G05A E Answers to question TT2G06 G Answers to question TC2G14 B Answers to question TT2G05B D Answers to question TC2G33A F Answers to question TC2G09 Table 2.11: Proportion of teachers in lower secondary education (ISCED 2) who can access certain types of activity within induction programmes, as reported by school heads, 2013 A 89.6 91.4 94.6 92.7 91.1 93.5 61.1 78.9 96.6 94.3 94.4 74.4 100.0 91.8 84.9 78.2 98.7 90.9 95.2 96.5 97.4 76.0 98.2 S.E. 1.13 2.68 1.55 3.05 3.02 3.29 6.93 3.75 1.27 2.06 0.17 7.32 0.00 4.20 6.18 4.07 0.90 3.66 2.44 1.63 0.08 9.90 1.07 B 88.5 81.3 91.9 75.1 95.5 86.1 97.7 91.8 88.8 63.7 82.2 96.8 98.1 93.4 90.8 87.8 86.1 91.9 92.0 98.4 60.9 85.8 80.9 S.E. 0.85 3.06 2.49 5.61 2.36 4.74 1.66 2.49 2.31 4.09 0.20 3.11 1.11 4.01 4.72 3.27 3.08 3.56 2.56 0.91 0.22 4.86 3.77 C 60.8 50.5 54.7 70.3 35.1 50.5 57.7 28.5 68.9 71.2 83.3 63.2 52.0 70.4 32.2 55.5 35.2 27.9 18.7 86.4 36.5 47.3 53.7 S.E. 1.53 3.94 4.22 5.08 6.41 6.96 7.03 4.31 3.34 3.85 0.22 8.20 6.04 8.16 8.17 6.00 4.27 5.65 3.78 2.92 0.22 8.76 4.35 D 40.8 11.6 54.1 39.1 24.8 62.0 48.0 33.6 51.8 15.8 67.6 70.3 21.8 75.1 56.1 68.4 57.8 25.4 31.2 54.4 54.0 58.8 59.8 S.E. 1.54 3.27 4.10 5.88 5.83 6.68 7.10 4.03 3.76 2.87 0.28 8.00 5.13 7.60 9.20 5.41 4.20 5.44 4.63 4.57 0.23 8.20 4.24 E 37.5 30.9 15.7 35.4 24.8 40.9 26.4 39.8 5.6 55.4 15.1 38.4 7.5 23.4 36.4 40.8 29.3 14.0 29.3 44.3 16.4 30.1 5.7 S.E. 1.77 4.14 2.67 6.05 5.64 6.68 7.01 4.17 1.65 4.06 0.16 9.20 2.82 6.73 8.66 5.14 3.76 3.30 4.42 4.19 0.16 7.35 1.93 F 34.8 29.8 16.1 95.8 46.6 38.1 26.8 7.6 27.6 24.9 26.3 52.2 53.5 27.9 41.3 62.1 89.1 7.1 16.1 47.5 20.0 26.2 50.9 S.E. 1.77 4.26 2.89 2.11 6.10 6.84 6.71 2.49 3.44 3.86 0.23 8.28 5.96 9.49 7.22 4.99 2.78 3.37 3.59 4.45 0.16 8.95 3.90 G 29.2 41.6 25.4 15.6 4.3 38.0 23.0 11.5 28.4 7.6 40.1 42.6 14.6 34.3 18.5 70.6 24.3 13.9 16.7 56.5 9.1 17.9 32.6 S.E. 1.47 4.60 3.75 3.92 2.33 6.80 6.92 2.75 3.31 2.06 0.31 9.17 4.00 8.62 7.65 5.33 3.74 3.54 3.65 4.35 0.16 6.24 3.61 H 26.0 9.2 0.0 34.6 4.5 24.3 24.9 15.6 65.6 20.3 33.7 66.5 15.7 6.1 22.3 66.8 46.2 6.1 16.1 33.8 9.1 2.3 52.5 S.E. 1.73 2.89 0.00 5.50 3.61 5.45 6.32 3.59 3.93 3.35 0.27 8.14 4.07 3.81 7.79 5.11 4.14 3.36 3.37 5.24 0.22 1.63 4.47 A Mentoring C Courses/seminars E Networking/virtual communities G Collaboration with other schools B Scheduled meetings with the school head and/or colleagues D Team teaching F Peer review H Diaries/journals Source: Eurydice, based on OECD, TALIS 2013 (see Figure 2.8). Data calculated on the basis of the questions TC2G35A to TC2G35I for respondents having answered 'yes' to question TC2G33A. 13

The Teaching Profession in Europe: Practices, Perceptions, and Policies Table 2.12: Proportion, by age group, of teachers in lower secondary education (ISCED 2), who have currently been assigned a mentor, 2013 < 30 years 28.2 29.4 20.0 19.3 15.3 18.5 12.4 20.3 25.5 7.8 33.3 21.5 31.7 44.7 6.5 17.0 16.5 10.2 23.9 34.9 19.1 24.6 29.8 S.E. 0.96 2.25 4.73 2.78 3.67 3.38 3.89 2.99 2.16 6.02 4.02 5.39 4.14 2.80 4.49 2.37 2.20 2.52 3.82 2.01 4.08 7.77 3.13 30-39 years 9.2 6.8 9.2 3.9 5.5 3.2 3.9 3.1 4.1 10.2 6.9 3.9 14.0 17.4 4.9 7.9 4.1 3.7 3.7 16.2 8.2 5.4 10.5 S.E. 0.44 1.04 1.45 0.76 1.23 1.09 0.94 0.65 0.63 1.48 1.05 1.04 2.05 1.25 0.78 1.16 0.65 0.91 0.70 1.31 1.37 2.16 1.03 40-49 years 5.3 2.9 5.8 1.4 3.6 2.2 3.1 1.8 0.6 5.4 4.2 2.4 16.9 3.7 3.1 6.9 1.8 1.8 2.5 14.4 4.0 2.5 3.8 S.E. 0.34 0.81 1.03 0.43 1.09 0.60 0.54 0.52 0.31 0.85 0.92 0.65 2.16 0.66 0.55 1.22 0.53 0.59 0.58 2.04 0.87 0.92 0.80 50-59 years 4.1 1.9 3.9 0.9 1.8 1.9 3.7 0.5 1.6 2.1 1.3 3.6 12.5 1.8 5.9 5.0 1.7 0.7 1.4 13.4 2.9 6.7 2.2 S.E. 0.33 0.46 0.64 0.34 0.66 0.59 0.85 0.33 0.58 0.39 0.60 0.90 1.59 0.56 0.97 1.16 0.55 0.29 0.43 2.06 0.97 3.39 0.55 60 years 3.4 3.2 5.1 0.7 1.4 1.3 5.3 1.9 0.9 1.4 1.9 3.0 5.9 0.0 0.7 3.0 2.7 4.1 2.8 16.0 2.5 4.4 0.9 S.E. 0.51 2.51 1.72 0.59 0.79 0.57 1.98 1.08 0.41 0.64 1.92 1.07 2.16 0.00 0.70 1.35 1.08 1.62 1.13 5.11 1.44 4.06 0.47 Source: Eurydice, based on OECD, TALIS 2013 (see Figure 2.10). Data calculated on the basis of the answers to questions TT2G20A and TT2G02. Table 2.13: The predictive value of certain selected factors in the current assignment of a mentor to teachers in lower secondary education (ISCED 2), 2013 Odds ratios EU BE nl BG CZ DK EE ES FR HR IT CY LV NL PL PT RO SK FI SE UK-ENG IS NO RS A 3.3 1.7 3.4 6.3 2.9 9.4 12.4 2.7 2.8 2.5 2.6 2.2 4.0 4.9 3.3 3.0 6.1 3.1 B 1.6 11.5 2.4 8.2 2.8 6.6 2.9 1.8 2.1 0.4 5.3 3.3 1.3 2.3 3.5 C 1.7 1.9 2.4 3.1 2.2 0.7 6.3 3.3 D 4.6 1.9 2.5 4.0 2.3 0.1 2.5 0.2 3.2 5.2 1.8 4.1 1.9 2.1 3.9 2.0 0.5 E 1.8 2.4 1.6 3.4 3.5 1.6 7.1 F 1.4 1.9 2 2.6 G 0.5 2.7 2.3 1.5 0.7 0.4 A Teachers with no more than 5 years of teaching experience D Employment on a fixed-term contract F Location in a city (over 15 000 inhabitants) B Teachers with no more than 5 years of experience at their school E A mentoring system is available at the school G High school enrolment (over 400 pupils) C Teachers aged no more than 40 years Source: Eurydice, based on OECD, TALIS 2013 (see Figure 2.11). s Odds ratios for each of the predicting factors are considered under the control of all others. For further explanation on multiple logistic regressions, see the Statistical Note. The odds ratios associated with the predicting factors represent the increase likelihood of currently having a mentor according to the score to the question. Only significant values are indicated in the table. The analysis is based on combining the 'presently having an assigned mentor' factor (answers to questions TT2G20A) to 7 selected factors. A Answers to question TT2G05B C Answers to question TT2G02 E Answers to question TC2G36, options 1, 2 and/or 3 G Answers to question TC2G14 B Answers to question TT2G05A D Answers to question TT2G06 F Answers to question TC2G09 Table 2.14: The predictive value of certain selected factors in the designation, as mentors, of teachers in lower secondary education (ISCED 2), 2013 Odds ratios EU BE nl BG CZ DK EE ES FR HR IT CY LV NL PL PT RO SK FI SE UK-ENG IS NO RS A 1.2 1.8 2.0 2.1 2.9 1.6 2.8 3.2 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.7 B 1.5 2.1 1.6 1.6 1.6 2.6 1.8 1.5 1.6 1.6 1.9 2.1 C 0.8 1.4 2.0 1.4 1.5 D 1.6 1.9 1.8 1.8 1.6 1.9 3.6 1.9 3.6 1.6 2.1 2.3 1.7 1.4 E 2.9 5.2 3.4 2.6 6.7 3.6 0.5 2.3 3 2.4 2.0 2.5 2.7 5 3.5 15.6 F 2.0 1.9 2.0 0.4 1.7 1.8 2.7 2.1 0.3 2.0 G 1.6 2.4 1.4 1.9 1.4 1.4 H 0.6 1.5 A B Teachers with over 10 years of teaching experience Teachers with over 5 years of experience at their school C Teachers aged over 40 years E Permanent employee status G Location in a city (over 15 000 inhabitants) D Teachers have taken part in an induction programme as newcomers to teaching Source: Eurydice, based on OECD, TALIS 2013 (see Figure 2.12). s 14 F A mentoring system is available at the school H High school enrolment (over 400 pupils) Odds ratios for each of the predicting factors are considered under the control of all others. For further explanation on multiple logistic regressions, see the Statistical Note. The odds ratios associated with the predicting factors represent the increase likelihood of acting as a mentor according to the score to the question. Only significant values are indicated in the table.