JMU Technology Satisfaction Survey, 2013 Faculty and Staff

Similar documents
Speak Up 2012 Grades 9 12

FAU Mobile App Goes Live

K 1 2 K 1 2. Iron Mountain Public Schools Standards (modified METS) Checklist by Grade Level Page 1 of 11

CIT Annual Update for

rience Survey rt unication

Connect, Communicate, and Collaborate: Lead the Charge! Mindy Ramon, Fulton County Schools Hoke Wilcox, iteach KSU

Midland College Syllabus MUSI 1311 Music Theory I SCH (3-3)

SYLLABUS- ACCOUNTING 5250: Advanced Auditing (SPRING 2017)

Introduction to Mobile Learning Systems and Usability Factors

Beginning to Flip/Enhance Your Classroom with Screencasting. Check out screencasting tools from (21 Things project)

2 User Guide of Blackboard Mobile Learn for CityU Students (Android) How to download / install Bb Mobile Learn? Downloaded from Google Play Store

Please find below a summary of why we feel Blackboard remains the best long term solution for the Lowell campus:

SYSTEM QUALITY CHARACTERISTICS FOR SELECTING MOBILE LEARNING APPLICATIONS

Education the telstra BLuEPRint

Best Practices in Internet Ministry Released November 7, 2008

An Introduction and Overview to Google Apps in K12 Education: A Web-based Instructional Module

New Paths to Learning with Chromebooks

The Teaching and Learning Center

An Open Letter to the Learners of This Planet

CIS 121 INTRODUCTION TO COMPUTER INFORMATION SYSTEMS - SYLLABUS

Spring 2015 Online Testing. Program Information and Registration and Technology Survey (RTS) Training Session

Student Handbook. Supporting Today s Students with the Technology of Tomorrow

Evaluation of Respondus LockDown Browser Online Training Program. Angela Wilson EDTECH August 4 th, 2013

Managing Printing Services

EdX Learner s Guide. Release

FY16 UW-Parkside Institutional IT Plan Report

AST Introduction to Solar Systems Astronomy

Meriam Library LibQUAL+ Executive Summary

Madison Online Volume I, Issue II October Tech News. Inside this Issue:

2013 Annual HEITS Survey (2011/2012 data)

Spring 2015 Achievement Grades 3 to 8 Social Studies and End of Course U.S. History Parent/Teacher Guide to Online Field Test Electronic Practice

Introduction to Moodle

Appendix L: Online Testing Highlights and Script

COURSE SYLLABUS: CPSC6142 SYSTEM SIMULATION-SPRING 2015

Academic Support Services Accelerated Learning Classes The Learning Success Center SMARTHINKING Student computer labs Adult Education

Introduction to Yearbook / Newspaper Course Syllabus

Student User s Guide to the Project Integration Management Simulation. Based on the PMBOK Guide - 5 th edition

Online ICT Training Courseware

Call Center Assessment-Technical Support (CCA-Technical Support)

ADMN-1311: MicroSoft Word I ( Online Fall 2017 )

Learning, Communication, and 21 st Century Skills: Students Speak Up For use with NetDay Speak Up Survey Grades 3-5

Collaboration: Meeting the Library User's Needs in a Digital Environment

Quick Reference for itslearning

ICT A learning and teaching tool By Sushil Upreti SOS Hermann Gmeiner School Sanothimi Sanothimi, Bhaktapur, Nepal

University of Florida ADV 3502, Section 1B21 Advertising Sales Fall 2017

Laura K. Ball. Drexel University

ATENEA UPC AND THE NEW "Activity Stream" or "WALL" FEATURE Jesus Alcober 1, Oriol Sánchez 2, Javier Otero 3, Ramon Martí 4

Tracking Learning Experiences Using the Experience API

1 Instructional Design Website: Making instruction easy for HCPS Teachers Henrico County, Virginia

OFFICE SUPPORT SPECIALIST Technical Diploma

Five Challenges for the Collaborative Classroom and How to Solve Them

Beveridge Primary School. One to one laptop computer program for 2018

1 Use complex features of a word processing application to a given brief. 2 Create a complex document. 3 Collaborate on a complex document.

Restorative Measures In Schools Survey, 2011

Enter the World of Polling, Survey &

Visual Journalism J3220 Syllabus

Education & Training Plan Civil Litigation Specialist Certificate Program with Externship

Louisiana Free Materials List

DISTANCE LEARNING OF ENGINEERING BASED SUBJECTS: A CASE STUDY. Felicia L.C. Ong (author and presenter) University of Bradford, United Kingdom

POFI 1349 Spreadsheets ONLINE COURSE SYLLABUS

Science Olympiad Competition Model This! Event Guidelines

Distributed Weather Net: Wireless Sensor Network Supported Inquiry-Based Learning

CSCI 333 Java Language Programming Fall 2017 INSTRUCTOR INFORMATION COURSE INFORMATION

Learning in the digital age

TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY-TEXARKANA COLLEGE OF EDUCATION AND LIBERAL ARTS COURSE SYLLABUS SPRING 2012

SYLLABUS: RURAL SOCIOLOGY 1500 INTRODUCTION TO RURAL SOCIOLOGY SPRING 2017

Teaching and Learning Resources

A faculty approach -learning tools. Audio Tools Tutorial and Presentation software Video Tools Authoring tools

Texas A&M University-Central Texas CISK Comprehensive Networking C_SK Computer Networks Monday/Wednesday 5.

CPMT 1347 Computer System Peripherals COURSE SYLLABUS

Imperial Avenue Holbrook High. Imperial Valley College. Political Science 102. American Government & Politics. Syllabus-Summer 2017

Strengthening assessment integrity of online exams through remote invigilation

Android App Development for Beginners

McGraw-Hill Connect and Create Built by Blackboard. Release Notes. Version 2.3 for Blackboard Learn 9.1

Contract Renewal, Tenure, and Promotion a Web Based Faculty Resource

EDIT 576 (2 credits) Mobile Learning and Applications Fall Semester 2015 August 31 October 18, 2015 Fully Online Course

EDIT 576 DL1 (2 credits) Mobile Learning and Applications Fall Semester 2014 August 25 October 12, 2014 Fully Online Course

How Satisfied Are You With Your MOOC? A Research Study About Interaction in Huge Online Courses. Hanan Khalil

Streaming Video Control Review. Who am I?

Connect Communicate Collaborate. Transform your organisation with Promethean s interactive collaboration solutions

Using Moodle in ESOL Writing Classes

Read&Write Gold is a software application and can be downloaded in Macintosh or PC version directly from

DICE - Final Report. Project Information Project Acronym DICE Project Title

ICT/IS 200: INFORMATION LITERACY & CRITICAL THINKING Online Spring 2017

MGMT 479 (Hybrid) Strategic Management

Security & Technology. Track & Tennis. Repairs. Remodeling & Interior Repairs. Exterior Wall. Repairs

An Industrial Technologist s Core Knowledge: Web-based Strategy for Defining Our Discipline

Dialogue Live Clientside

Innovation and new technologies

Course Policies and Syllabus BUL3130 The Legal, Ethical, and Social Aspects of Business Syllabus Spring A 2017 ONLINE

ITSC 2321 Integrated Software Applications II COURSE SYLLABUS

Rental Property Management: An Android Application

INTRODUCTION TO HEALTH PROFESSIONS HHS CREDITS FALL 2012 SYLLABUS

Vodcasting: A case study in adaptability to meet learners needs and preferences

SMARTboard: The SMART Way To Engage Students

Leveraging MOOCs to bring entrepreneurship and innovation to everyone on campus

ICTinSchools Report2011

Photography: Photojournalism and Digital Media Jim Lang/B , extension 3069 Course Descriptions

Syllabus: CS 377 Communication and Ethical Issues in Computing 3 Credit Hours Prerequisite: CS 251, Data Structures Fall 2015

Chamilo 2.0: A Second Generation Open Source E-learning and Collaboration Platform

Transcription:

JMU Technology Satisfaction Survey, Faculty and Staff Key Findings 1. For the ninth straight year, overall satisfaction with technology at JMU remains high with ninety-percent reporting satisfied/very satisfied. (Table 4) 2. Ninety-three percent report overall satisfaction with Microsoft Exchange. (Table 18) 3. Infrastructure improvements are making a difference. Satisfaction with and awareness of JMU Official Wireless service remained the same while campus network bandwidth increased in satisfaction from sixty seven percent to seventy three percent. (Table 15) 4. Wireless access to email from a personally owned device increased six percent from sixty-one percent to sixty-seven percent. (Table 8) 5. The survey found a ten percent increase from in faculty and staff usage of ipads (Table 35) and a fifteen percent increase in the use of smart phones moving from fifty-three percent to sixty- eight percent. (Table 36) 6. IT continues to add services to MyMadison and the Employee Self-Service functionality satisfaction increased five percent from eighty-three percent to eighty-eight percent. (Table 6) Background Since 2004, the Technology Satisfaction Survey strives to shed light on the satisfaction with technology of faculty and staff working at JMU. While the annual survey focuses on satisfaction, it also looks at the use of technology and other factors that may contribute to the ratings. The survey is a joint effort of Information Technology (IT) and Libraries and Educational Technologies (L&ET). The survey continuously evolves as the technologies impacting the University change. Gathering data annually provides IT and L&ET an opportunity to explore trends in the use of technology at JMU. Some findings remain consistent year after year. Others point to potential changes that IT and L&ET will use to inform decisions relating to technology and related services. For example, increased use of video and other bandwidth intensive applications led to a major network upgrade in and additional bandwidth increases in and. Reviewing the results of the survey provides insight into the level of satisfaction with IT initiatives including the additional services in MyMadison, increased availability of the wireless network, and additional bandwidth increases as mentioned above. L&ET uses the survey to monitor satisfaction with technology and services including the course management systems Blackboard and Canvas and classroom technology, as well as to look for trends with implications for teaching and learning. Methodology The JMU Technology Satisfaction Survey builds on the surveys from the previous years. All full and part time faculty and staff received invitational e-mails in spring to participate in the web-based quantitative survey. The report of the survey uses comments from the open-ended survey questions to illustrate discussions of the findings. The tables included in the report provide longitudinal data from, and, when available. Faculty/Staff Technology Satisfaction Survey 1

Demographics The response rate dropped to thirteen percent in from fourteen percent in. As in previous surveys, half of the 536 respondents classify themselves as staff, with administrative and professional faculty making up twenty-one percent of the respondents and instructional faculty accounting for twenty eight percent (Table 1). Findings Overall satisfaction with technology at JMU remains high with over ninety percent reporting satisfied/very satisfied. Twenty-five percent of the survey respondents report that they are very satisfied overall with technology at JMU with an additional sixty-five percent reporting they are satisfied (Table 4). Since its inception, ninety percent or more of the faculty and staff have expressed overall satisfaction with technology at JMU on the annual survey. Comments include: I've always had excellent customer service from EVERYONE in IT. Table 4 How would you rate your overall satisfaction with technology at JMU? Very No Basis to Evaluate Dissatisfied Very Dissatisfied 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 Ninety-three percent report overall satisfaction with Microsoft Exchange e-mail (Table 18). Ninety percent or more express satisfaction with spam control, anti-virus protection, speed, and reliability of JMU e-mail (Table 18). Just over sixty percent report using JMU e-mail through a client such as Outlook or Entourage; while thirty-seven percent use the web-based Outlook Web App (Table 17). Three-fourths report using Exchange calendar (Table 40). Among users, ninety percent report satisfied/very satisfied with Exchange calendar (Table 41). Faculty/Staff Technology Satisfaction Survey 2

Table 18 Antivirus protection on e-mail system Spam control on e-mail system Satisfaction with E-mail Speed of message delivery Reliability of e-mail E-mail Quota Overall Satisfaction 70 75 80 85 90 95 100 Overall satisfaction with central systems, the campus network, and IT services remain consistent with findings from previous surveys. Overall satisfaction with central administrative applications including Student Administration, Finance, remains consistent with previous years with nearly one-third reporting satisfaction and the rest responding no basis to judge (Table 7). Human Resource System shows a six percent decrease in satisfaction with a corresponding six percent increase in no basis to judge, while Central System Reporting increased three percent in satisfaction. Satisfaction with Computer Security remains high: the balance of security and ease of use (82%), confidentiality of information (83%), and the security of the campus network (87%) [Table 19]. Eighty seven percent indicates satisfied/very satisfied with the amount of information received in regards to computer security (Table 21). E- mail continues to be the way that faculty and staff would like to see information on computer security with nearly two-thirds indicating interested or very interested (Table 20). Over eighty percent indicate satisfaction with the reliability of the campus network (Table 15). Satisfaction with the network bandwidth increased from sixty-seven percent to seventy-three percent, showing that our continued efforts to increase bandwidth are noticed (Table 15). More faculty and staff report using the Official Wireless network with seventeen percent indicating No Basis, down six percent from and a total of fifteen percent from (Table 15). Faculty/Staff Technology Satisfaction Survey 3

Table 15 Infrastructure Services Bandwidth Reliability Official Wireless 0 20 40 60 80 100 The Computing HelpDesk continues to show a high level of satisfaction at eighty-four percent overall (Table 23) with eleven percent having no basis to judge. The level of satisfaction remains consistent with previous surveys for other Information Technology Services including software downloads (67%), repairs and maintenance of JMUowned computers (68%), and IT Training (69%) [Table 24]. The majority indicated satisfaction with software and operating system installation with sixty-six percent reporting satisfaction and one-fourth reporting no basis to judge (Table 24). Eighty-eight percent express satisfaction with MyMadison Employee Self-service up from eighty-three percent in with nine percent indicating no basis to judge (Table 6). Forty-percent express satisfaction with MyMadison Instructor/Advisor Self Service, with No Basis increasing to fifty-six percent (Table 5). With the increases in No Basis, the satisfaction level increases slightly from. Ninety four percent of the faculty and staff who teach report using Blackboard (Table 12). Ninety four percent of the respondents report using Blackboard. Instructional faculty made up twenty-eight percent of the survey respondents with Administrative and Professional faculty at twenty-one percent and staff at fifty-one percent (Table 1). Survey shows continued use of video, JMUtube and web video sharing sites such as YouTube as well as freely available web applications and services. One-fourth of respondents indicated they are satisfied with JMUtube, a service of the Center for Instructional Technology (CIT) to manage video and other media. (Table 27) Thirty percent report that they currently use video sharing sites such as YouTube with another thirty two percent either interested or looking to use, (Table 28). Faculty/Staff Technology Satisfaction Survey 4

The survey shows stability in the use of the following freely available web applications: Google Docs (25%), social networking (25%), MS Office Web Apps (18%), blogs (12%), wikis (13%), video conferencing (25%), and online presentation tools (10% )(Table 28). Table 28 Currently Using Freely Available Web Applications & Services Video Sharing Sites Wikis Google Docs MS Office Web Apps Blogs Social Networking Second Life Online Presentations Video Conferencing 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 Satisfaction for Classroom Technology decreased slightly while satisfaction with other Libraries and Educational Technologies (L&ET) services remain consistent with previous surveys. Seventy seven percent express overall satisfaction with the technology in the classrooms and labs (Table 34), a decrease from eighty one percent in. Most taught in classrooms equipped with technology. Fifty-seven percent indicate they teach most of their classes on the West Campus with twenty-seven percent on the East Campus (Table 33). Satisfaction remains consistent with previous surveys for L&ET services including off-campus access to on-line library resources (46%), video and audio upload and delivery services (26%), Media Resources equipment checkout (27%), and software checkout (19%), with the large percentage continuing to report No Basis (Table 27). The Center for Instructional Technology (CIT) services including faculty development training on teaching tools and systems (e.g. Blackboard) (47%), one on one consultations (e.g. House Calls) (42%), faculty development training on using technology in teaching (45%), institutes, sandboxes and immersion programs (e.g. Institute for Online or Hybrid Course Development, Classroom Technology Sandbox, etc.) (26%), as well as video production services (20%) walk-in services (33%) (Table 26) remain consistent with the levels of satisfaction and No Basis reported on previous surveys. Eighty-eight percent report satisfaction with the computer used most often at JMU (Table 44). Nearly seventy four percent report using Windows: Windows 8 (7%), Windows 7 (58%), Vista (2%), and Windows XP (7%) (Table 42). JMU has been working with departments to phase out Windows XP as Microsoft has Faculty/Staff Technology Satisfaction Survey 5

announced support for XP will end in spring 2014. Approximately seventy percent indicate that their computers are three years old or less (Table 43). Forty-two percent report using Internet Explorer most often, which is a decrease of seven percent from last year, followed by Firefox (31%), Chrome (16%), and Safari (10%) (Table 46). Table 38 Operating Systems Used Other Don't Know Linux Microsoft Macintosh 0 20 40 60 80 100 [ML-m1] Rising percentage of faculty and staff report using portable devices (e.g. smartphones, tablets). Faculty and staff report using the following phones: iphone (35%), Android (31%), Blackberry (2%), and Windows Mobile (1%). Twenty-eight percent of the faculty and staff reported having basic phones (Table 36). This year s survey shows twenty-seven percent interested in conducting University business via web browser on the cell phone, which was a significant drop from fifty-five percent two years ago (Table 39). Faculty/Staff Technology Satisfaction Survey 6

Table 36 Cell Phones Used iphone Blackberry Windows Mobile Android Phone Basic Cell Phone Do Not Have Cell Phone 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Fifty percent of the faculty and staff indicate they currently use ipads with an additional seven percent looking to purchase, a significant increase from eighteen percent two years ago (Table 35). Eighteen percent currently use an ipod Touch (Table 35). Twenty one percent report using the Kindle, an increase of twelve percent from, and eight percent use the Nook e-book reader (Table 35). The increased use of these devices may also reflect in the drop in respondents indicating No Basis concerning the Official Wireless network from thirty-two percent in to seventeen percent in (Table 15). Fifty-nine percent indicate satisfaction with the Official Wireless service (Table 15). An increased number of faculty and staff indicate using their cell phones for the following activities: texting (86%), web browser (65%), checking JMU e-mail (58%), using map software such as Google maps (47%), checking JMU Exchange calendar (42%), social networking (43%), listening to audio (36%), playing games (33%), watching video (31%) and reading books (18%) (Table 37). IT and L&ET will continue to monitor the adoption and usage patterns of mobile devices. Information Technology is evaluating ways to make the applications used by students, faculty and staff more mobile friendly. Faculty/Staff Technology Satisfaction Survey 7

Table 37 How Faculty/Staff Use Cell Phone Make and Receive Calls Web Browser Texting JMU E-mail JMU Exchange Calendar Map Software Games Social Networking Listen to Audio Watch Videos Read Books Other 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 Faculty/Staff Technology Satisfaction Survey 8

Surveys Returned 536 ( 552 656) Surveys Distributed 3,994 (3,954 3,711) Return Percentage 13% (14% 18%) and results are shown in parenthesis. Table 1 Classification Instructional Faculty 28% (30% 30%) Administrative & Professional Faculty 21% (21% 20%) Staff (classified & wage) 51% (48% 47%) Affiliate 0% ( 1% 3%) Table 2 Status Full-time 86% (85% 83%) Part-time 14% (15% 17%) Table 3 College Affiliation Arts & Letters 26% (10% 11%) Business 11% ( 5% 4%) Education 10% ( 5% 4%) Integrated Science & Technology 12% (11% 10%) Science & Mathematics 13% ( 5% 6%) Visual & Performing Arts 7% ( 2% 2%) General Education 5% ( 1% 1%) School of Engineering 1% ( 1% ) Other 21% ( 5% 4%) Table 4 How would you rate your overall satisfaction with technology at JMU? Very 25% (26% 29%) 65% (66% 62%) No Basis to Evaluate 1% ( 2% 1%) Dissatisfied 8% ( 6% 8%) Very Dissatisfied 0% ( 0% 1%) Table 5 MyMadison Instructor/Advisor Self-Service Very / No Basis Instructor/Advisor Self- Service Overall Satisfaction 40% (42% 64%) 56% (52% 31%) Table 6 My Madison Employee Self-Service Very / No Basis Employee Self-Service Overall Satisfaction 88% (83% 93%) 9% (13% 4%) Table 7 Central Administrative Applications Very / No Basis Central System Reporting 22% (19% 29%) 76% (80% 69%) Student Administration-Overall 34% (34% 34%) 61% (62% 64%) Finance System-Overall 36% (35% 36%) 59% (61% 61%) Human Resource System- Overall 48% (54% 49%) 46% (40% 47%) Manager Self-Service 36% (33% 33%) 61% (63% 65%) Table 8 Satisfaction Using JMU s Official Wireless Network Very / No Basis To access e-mail from a personally owned device (e.g. pda, cell phone, ipad) 67% (61% ) 19% (26% ) Table 9 Satisfaction From Off-Campus (Remotely) Very / No Basis To access e-mail from a personally owned device (e.g. pda, cell phone, ipad) from off-campus 80% (77% ) 13% (18% ) Table 10 Level of Need for New Access Methods from JMU s Official Wireless Network Don t Would Use I Have A No Basis to Anticipate This Access Definite/ to Evaluate Needing Method Significant Such If It Were Need Access Available Finance System 48% (46% ) 16% (15% ) 7% (6% ) 29% (33% ) Core (i.e. non self-service) features of Student Administration System 45% (44% ) 18% (16% ) 8% (7% ) 29% (32% ) Core (i.e. non self-service features of Human Resource System 40% (40% ) 26% (22% ) 8% (8% ) 26% (30% ) Table 11 Level of Need for New Access Methods from Off-Campus (Remotely) Don t Would Use I Have A No Basis to Anticipate This Access Definite/ to Evaluate Needing Method Significant Such If It Were Need Access Available Finance System 53% (52% ) 15% (15% ) 6% (4% ) 27% (29% ) Core (i.e. non self-service) features of Student Administration System 48% (48% ) 17% (16% ) 9% (6% ) 26% (30% ) Core (i.e. non self-service features of Human Resource System 44% (42% ) 25% (26% ) 8% (6% ) 24% (26% ) Table 12 Learning Management System Currently Using Blackboard 94% (88% ) Moodle 1% ( 1% ) Canvus (by Instructure) 3% ( 0% ) CourseKit 1% ( 1% ) WordPress or another blog service 8% (10% ) Wiki 2% ( 6% ) Other 7% (10% ) Table 13 Blackboard Satisfaction Note: Percentages are respondents that use Blackboard. Very / No Basis Overall, as a teaching & learning tool 70% (44% 69%) 9% (44% 19%) Assignments 57% ( ) 27% ( ) Group work & Collaboration 27% ( ) 53% ( Online readings & links to text-based materials 69% (45% 69%) 23% (50% 25%) Links to video, audio & other media (e.g. Presenter, PowerPoint) 47% (37% 59%) 37% (57% 34%) Online discussion boards 37% (30% 45%) 44% (63% 43%) Exams and quizzes 31% (19% 34%) 45% (69% 53%) Sharing material among students/faculty/staff 75% (54% 82%) 11% (39% 11%) Keeping track of grades 54% (31% 48%) 23% (58% 39%) Faculty/Staff Technology Satisfaction Survey 9

and results are shown in parenthesis. Table 14 Blackboard Support Very / No Basis Self-help and FAQ s found on the web 48% (34% 53%) 32% (56% 36%) Help via e-mail or online request form 48% (31% 49%) 43% (66% 45%) Help via phone (x8-5312) 38% (26% ) 53% (72% ) Availability of support 56% (38% ) 33% (59% ) Workshops & one on one consultations (e.g. House Calls) 30% (21% ) 66% (77% ) Table 15 Infrastructure Services Very / No Basis Campus network bandwidth 73% (67% 67%) 12% (16% 20%) Campus network reliability 83% (82% 81%) 6% ( 8% 8%) Official Wireless 59% (59% 51%) 17% (23% 32%) Table 16 Storage Space Very / No Basis Shared Drives 75% (76% 66%) 15% (15% 17%) Video & Other Streaming Needs 42% (47% 44%) 49% (46% 46%) Table 17 E-mail System Used Most JMU e-mail through Outlook Web (OWA) (exchange.jmu.edu) 37% (42% 46%) JMU e-mail through client software (such as Outlook, OS X Mail, Entourage) 61% (56% 50%) Other 2% ( 3% 2%) Table 18 E-mail Anti-Virus, Spam, Speed, Reliability, Quota Very / No Basis Anti-virus protection on e-mail system 91% (91% 90%) 6% ( 7% 7%) Spam control on e-mail system 91% (91% 90%) 2% ( 4% 3%) Speed of message delivery 94% (95% 94%) 2% ( 2% 1%) Reliability of e-mail 94% (96% 93%) 1% ( 2% 2%) E-mail Quota 82% (86% 88%) 6% ( 5% 3%) Overall Satisfaction 93% (97% 93%) 1% ( 2% 1%) Table 19 Computer Security Very / No Basis Balance between security and ease of use 82% (85% 83%) 3% ( 3% 4%) Confidentiality of information (SSN, grades) 83% (85% 80%) 16% (14% 19%) Security of JMU network 87% (88% 86%) 11% (11% 12%) Table 20 Where would you like to see JMU Computer Security Information? Very Somewhat Not Interested Interested Interested Interested Facebook 5% 10% 13% 72% ( 5% 6%) (15% 15%) (13% 12%) (67% 67%) ( 2% 2%) ( 7% 10%) (12% 10%) (79% 79%) RSS Feed 2% 8% 13% 77% ( 3% 3%) ( 9% 10%) (14% 14%) (74% 73%) Table 20 Where would you like to see JMU Computer Security Information? continued Very Somewhat Not Interested Interested Interested Interested E-mail 23% 40% 18% 19% (23% 26%) (41% 41%) (22% 20%) (14% 13%) Online Video Tutorials 13% 28% 20% 39% (11% 11%) (31% 32%) (23% 20%) (36% 37%)2 Other 2% 5% 3% 92% ( 3% 3%) ( 4% 3%) ( 3% 5%) (90% 90%) Table 21 How satisfied are you with the JMU Computer Security Information you receive? Very / No Basis Ease of understanding 91% (93% 90%) 3% (3% 5%) Timeliness 90% (91% 88%) 5% (6% 8%) Amount of information 87% (88% 87%) 4% (4% 7%) Table 22 How Frequently do you see Virus Warnings/Evidence on your Computer? Daily Weekly Occasionally Never Do Not Use Windows 2% 7% 35% 44% 12% (2% 2%) (6% 7%) (41% 43%) (41% 38%) (10% 10%) Macintosh OS 1% 1% 9% 33% 57% (<1% <1%) ( 2%<1%) ( 5% 6%) (29% 24%) (64% 69%) Linux <1% 0% 1% 12% 87% (<1%0%) (<1% 0%) (<1%<1%) (11% 8%) (90% 91%) Table 23 Computing HelpDesk Very / No Basis Promptness 81% (84% 80%) 13% (12% 15%) Professionalism of Staff 85% (85% 80%) 13% (13% 16%) Self-Help and FAQ found on Web 64% (68% 64%) 27% (25% 30%) HelpDesk Overall Satisfaction 84% (86% 81%) 11% (11% 14%) Table 24 Information Technology Services Very / No Basis Software downloads found on the Computing web site 67% (68% 67%) 26% (28% 26%) IT Training 69% (71% 72%) 26% (27% 25%) Web Manager 34% (33% 35%) 55% (55% 57%) Repair and maintenance of JMU owned computers 68% (75% 70%) 26% (22% 25%) On-Line Computing News on main computing web page 53% (58% 55%) 42% (39% 42%) Software and operating system installations 66% (70% 69%) 26% (25% 24%) Project Initiation Questionnaire 26% (24% 26%) 65% (68% 66%) System Alerts found on main Computing web page 58% (61% 55%) 34% (34% 39%) File and Printer Sharing 67% (73% 64%) 27% (21% 26%) Table 25 How do you prefer to learn new technology? In a Classroom lead by instructor 14% (16% 14%) Electronic resources such as computer-based Twitter 2% 6% 8% 84% or web-based training 24% (21% 24%) ( 2% 2%) ( 7% 6%) ( 8% 8%) (84% 84%) Blend of computer based training and Instructor-led 53% (48% 57%) Blog 3% 7% 14% 76% One-on-one ( 3% 2%) (10% 10%) (14% 14%) (73% 73%) Consultation (e.g. Podcast 1% 4% 11% 83% House Calls) 7% (11% ) Other 3% ( 4% 4%) Faculty/Staff Technology Satisfaction Survey 10

and results are shown in parenthesis. Table 26 Center for Instructional Technology Very / No Basis One-on-one Consultations (e.g. Housecalls) 42% (31% 26%) 56% (68% 73%) Faculty development training on teaching tools and systems (eg: Blackboard) 47% (34% 36%) 46% (63% 61%) Faculty development training using technology in teaching 45% (29% 32%) 50% (70% 66%) Walk-in Services 33% (23% 26%) 65% (76% 73%) Institutes for Online & Blended Course Develop. 26% ( ) 70% ( ) Sandboxes & Immersion Programs (e.g. Classroom Technology Sandbox, Digital Storytelling, Mobile, etc) 16% (19% 20%) 82% (81% 78%) Video Production Services 20% (16% ) 76% (83% ) Table 27 Libraries and Educational Technologies Services Very / No Basis Off-campus access to on-line library resources 46% (46% 52%) 44% (48% 42%) Video & Audio Upload & Delivery Services (e.g. JMUtube) 26% (25% 33%) 69% (72% 62%) Software checkout SPSS/SAS) 19% (18% 18%) 78% (80% 81%) Media Resources equipment checkout (video cameras, audio recorders) 27% (29% 29%) 70% (69% 69%) Availability of video & audio content (e.g. the Online Video Collection) 26% (26% ) 69% (70% ) Table 28 Interest in using Freely Available Web Applications and Services as Part of Teaching or Work Currently Interested Looking Not Using to Use Interested Video sharing sites (YouTube) 30% 22% 10% 39% (31% 32%) (23% 23%) (10%11%) (36% 34%) Wikis 13% 21% 6% 60% (13% 13%) (22% 22%) ( 8%10%) (57% 54%) Google Docs 25% 28% 9% 38% (28% 25%) (27% 31%) ( 7%11%) (38% 34%) MS Office Web Apps 18% 34% 8% 38% (18% 14%) (35% 33%) ( 8%11%) (39% 42%) Blogs 12% 25% 7% 57% ( 15% 13%) (21% 20%) ( 9% 9%) (55% 58%) Social Networking (Facebook, MySpace) 25% 21% 6% 49% (25% 23%) (14% 16%) (5% 7%) (56% 54%) Second Life 2% 8% 2% 89% (3% 2%) ( 9% 11%) (<1% 6%) (87% 81%) Online Presentation Tools (e.g. Prezi, VoiceThread, Popplet, etc.) 10% 29% 11% 51% ( 8% )( 32% ) (12% ) (48% ) Table 28 Interest in using Freely Available Web Applications and Services as Part of Teaching or Work continued Currently Interested Looking Not Using to Use Interested Video Conferencing (e.g. Lync, Skype, Google, Hangout, Etc.) 25% 27% 12% 36% (23% )(30% )(12% ) ( 5% ) Other 3% 8% 1% 87% (5% 5%) (3% 7%) (3% 7%) (90% 82%) Table 29 Interest in using the following Instructional Technologies Currently Interested Looking Not Using to Use Interested Elluminate 11% 35% 14% 41% (11%6%) (29% 15%) (14%10%) (46% 69%) Respondus 12% 36% 10% 43% (7% 4%) (17% 12%) ( 7% 5%) (68% 80%) Clickers/Student response systems 8% 36% 14% 42% (7% 5%) (20% 16%) ( 6% 7%) (67% 71%) Madison Digital Image Database (MDID) 9% 37% 12% 42% (5% 9%) (27% 22%) (8% 6%) (60% 63%) JMUtube 20% 30% 18% 32% (12%16%) (28% 24%) ( 9% 7%) (52% 53%) Plagiarism Detection (SafeAssign) 15% 41% 14% 30% (5% 2%) (24% 23%) (9%13%) (63% 63%) Lecture capture or recording 15% 36% 13% 36% (8% 7% ) (21% 20%) (10%10%) (61% 64%) Video production 8% 35% 12% 45% (7% 7% ) (26% 23%) (9% 9% ) (58% 61%) Social Media (e.g. blog, wiki) 16% 32% 9% 43% (12%12% ) (20% 17%) (7% 8% ) (60% 63%) Smartboards 16% 32% 9% 43% ( 5% 5% ) ( 26% 22%) ( 8%10%) (61%63%) Table 30 Satisfaction with the Following Services Very / No Basis Technology services/ support in teaching experience 40% (43% 42%) 57% (53% 52%) Technology services/support for increasing productivity and collaboration with colleagues 52% (53% 47%) 41% (41% 46%) Table 31 Computing Labs Services Very / No Basis Software installation requests for facilities west of I81 17% ( ) 81% ( ) Software installation requests Faculty/Staff Technology Satisfaction Survey 11

for facilities east of I81 12% ( ) 87% ( ) Reservation requests for facilities east of I81 13% ( ) 85% ( ) Reservation requests for facilities east of I81 11% ( ) 88% ( ) Availability for hands-on instruction west of I81 12% ( ) 87% ( ) Availability for hands-on Instruction east of I81 9% ( ) 90% ( ) and results are shown in parenthesis. Table 32 This academic year, how did you teach most of your classes? 100% face-to-face in the classroom 63% (29% 27%) Mixture with face-to-face in classroom and some online 31% (10% 13%) Online (80% or more) with little or no face-to-face time in classroom 6% ( 2% 1%) Table 33 Where did you teach most of your classes this semester? Technology classroom East of I-81 27% (25% 27%) Technology classroom West of I-81 57% (59% 61%) Classroom with no permanently installed technology East of I-81 6% ( 5% 3%) Classroom with no permanently installed technology West of I-81 8% ( 6% 4%) Computer lab East of I-81 1% ( 2% 2%) Computer Lab West of I-81 1% ( 3% 2%) Table 34 Technology in the Classroom/Lab Very / No Basis Overall Satisfaction with Technology in the Classroom/Lab 77% ( 81%81%) 4% ( 9% 9%) No 56% (59% 52%) Not Sure 31% (29% 21%) Table 39 Conducting University Business via Web Browser on Cell Phone Yes 27% (28% 55%) No 34% (33% 26%) Not Sure 38% (40% 18%) Table 40 Access to Exchange Calendar I do not use Exchange Calendar 24% (25% 33%) Outlook Web 13% (15% 19%) Outlook Desktop Client 52% (45% 41%) Entourage 1% ( 2% 3%) ical 3% ( 5% 2%) Phone 6% ( 4% ) Tablet 1% ( 1% ) Other 1% ( 2% ) Table 41 Exchange Calendar Satisfaction Very / No Basis Overall Satisfaction 90% (90% 89%) 4% ( 5% 3% ) Table 42 What operating system do you use most often at JMU? Macintosh OS 10.8 Mt Lion 8% ( ) Macintosh OS 10.7 Lion 6% ( 6% ) Macintosh OS 10.6 Snow Leopard 4% ( 8% 12%) Macintosh OS 10.5 Leopard 1% ( 2% 4%) Microsoft Windows 8 7% ( ) Microsoft Windows 7 58% (52% 38%) Microsoft Vista 2% ( 4% 7%) Microsoft Windows XP 7% (21% 34%) Linux 1% ( 1% 0%) Don t Know 6% ( 5% 4%) Other 1% ( 2% 0%) Table 35 Intent to Use the Following Devices Currently Looking Not Interested Using to Purchase in Using Desktop 86% (88% 85%) <1% (0% <1%) 10% ( 9% 11%) Laptop 77% (74% 70%) 5% ( 3% 6%) 7% (14%13%) ipod Touch 18% (19% 20%) 3% ( 2% 2%) 64% (62% 58%) ipad 50% (40% 18% ) 7%( 9%14%) 24% (38%38%) Windows 8 Tablet 2% ( ) 4% ( ) 27% ( ) Other Tablet 3% ( 4% 5% ) 1% ( 3% 4% ) 80% (74%70%) Nook Reading Device 8% ( 6% 4% ) <1% (<1% 2%) 79% (78% 74%) Kindle Reading Device 21% (19% 9% ) 1% ( 3% 3% ) 66% (63% 65%) Table 36 Which Type Cell Phone Do You Use? iphone 35% (20% 11%) BlackBerry 2% ( 3% 7% ) Windows Mobile 1% ( 2% 7% ) Android Phone 31% (28% 13%) Basic Cell Phone (can t access e-mail/web) 28% (43% 55%) Do Not Have Cell Phone 3% ( 3% 4% ) Table 37 How Do You Use Your Cell Phone? Make and receive calls 98% (99% 98%) Web browser 65% (53% 38%) Texting 86% (79% 75%) JMU e-mail 58% (47% 33%) JMU Exchange calendar 41% (35% 18%) Map software (e.g. Google Maps) 47% (44% 25%) Games 33% (27% 17%) Social Networking (e.g. Facebook/Twitter) 43% (35% 23%) Listen to Audio 36% (30% 19%) Watch Videos 31% (25% 17%) Read Books 18% (17% 7%) Other 6% ( 3% 5%) Table 43 How old is your computer? Less than a year 14% (19% 16%) 1-3 years 55% (51% 52%) More than 3 years 24% (20% 25%) Don t know 7% (10% 7%) Table 44 Overall Satisfaction with Computer Used Most Often at JMU Very / Very Dissatisfied/ Dissatisfied 88% (95% 91%) 11% (6% 8%) Table 45 How many hours a week do you spend performing work tasks on your computer? 0-5 3% ( 4% 5%) 6-10 5% ( 5% 7%) 11-15 7% ( 6% 9%) 16-20 11% (12% 12%) more than 20 74% (72% 67%) Table 46 Internet Browser Used Most Often Internet Explorer 42% (49% 53%) Firefox 31% (32% 34%) Safari 10% ( 7% 6%) Chrome 16% (12% 7%) Other 1% ( 1% 1%) Table 47 Using JMU Web to Find Information Very / No Basis Computing 77% (79% 80%) 15% (11% 12%) CIT 47% (48% 51%) 49% (47% 45%) JMU Libraries 61% (62% 61%) 34% (32% 34%) Technology classrooms 29% (31% 31%) 68% (63% 64%) Table 38 Text Messages from JMU Beyond Emergency Notifications JMU Telecommunications 39% ( ) 56% ( ) Yes 12% (12% 28%) Overall experience with Faculty/Staff Technology Satisfaction Survey 12

JMU web 83% (90% 86%) 7% ( 4% 7%) Table 48 Usefulness of Information on the JMU web? Very Useful/ Slightly Useful/ Useful Not Useful 79% (85% 86%) 20% (15% 13%) Table 49 Are you teaching or have you taught credit courses at JMU during the current academic year? Yes No 37% ( ) 63% ( ) Table 50 Overall Satisfaction with Telecommunications Services? Very l/ No Basis Voice Mail Services 78% ( ) 13% ( ) Emergency Phone Locations 45% ( ) 51% ( ) Overall Satisfaction 82% ( ) 12% ( ) Faculty/Staff Technology Satisfaction Survey 13