Student Opinion of Teaching Questionnaire Results

Similar documents
Survey Evaluation Results

A Study of the Effectiveness of Using PER-Based Reforms in a Summer Setting

UNIT ONE Tools of Algebra

STUDENT PERCEPTION SURVEYS ACTIONABLE STUDENT FEEDBACK PROMOTING EXCELLENCE IN TEACHING AND LEARNING

AC : DEVELOPMENT OF AN INTRODUCTION TO INFRAS- TRUCTURE COURSE

CHEMISTRY 400 Senior Seminar in Chemistry Spring 2013

STUDENTS' RATINGS ON TEACHER

Me on the Map. Standards: Objectives: Learning Activities:

Evidence-based Practice: A Workshop for Training Adult Basic Education, TANF and One Stop Practitioners and Program Administrators

COMMUNITY RESOURCES, INC.

Loudoun Scholarship Application

a) analyse sentences, so you know what s going on and how to use that information to help you find the answer.

Tutor Guidelines Fall 2016

E-3: Check for academic understanding

Outline for Session III

University of Waterloo School of Accountancy. AFM 102: Introductory Management Accounting. Fall Term 2004: Section 4

College of Arts and Science Procedures for the Third-Year Review of Faculty in Tenure-Track Positions

STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT

EXPANSION PACKET Revision: 2015

SAN DIEGO JUNIOR THEATRE TUITION ASSISTANCE APPLICATION

Project title: Ecological, what else? Sustainable schools on the fast lane in Europe! Final evaluation report. 2nd Dicember 2014.

Developing creativity in a company whose business is creativity By Andy Wilkins

and secondary sources, attending to such features as the date and origin of the information.

Learning Lesson Study Course

A non-profit educational institution dedicated to making the world a better place to live

Visit us at:

Mathematics Success Level E

Accuplacer Implementation Report Submitted by: Randy Brown, Ph.D. Director Office of Institutional Research Gavilan College May 2012

The lab is designed to remind you how to work with scientific data (including dealing with uncertainty) and to review experimental design.

Let s think about how to multiply and divide fractions by fractions!

Evaluation of a College Freshman Diversity Research Program

Stochastic Calculus for Finance I (46-944) Spring 2008 Syllabus

MINUTE TO WIN IT: NAMING THE PRESIDENTS OF THE UNITED STATES

Are You Ready? Simplify Fractions

Using Proportions to Solve Percentage Problems I

COSI Meet the Majors Fall 17. Prof. Mitch Cherniack Undergraduate Advising Head (UAH), COSI Fall '17: Instructor COSI 29a

Many instructors use a weighted total to calculate their grades. This lesson explains how to set up a weighted total using categories.

Cal s Dinner Card Deals

Community Power Simulation

Best Practices in Internet Ministry Released November 7, 2008

Standards-Based Bulletin Boards. Tuesday, January 17, 2012 Principals Meeting

Why Pay Attention to Race?

Penn State University - University Park MATH 140 Instructor Syllabus, Calculus with Analytic Geometry I Fall 2010

Do students benefit from drawing productive diagrams themselves while solving introductory physics problems? The case of two electrostatic problems

MATH 1A: Calculus I Sec 01 Winter 2017 Room E31 MTWThF 8:30-9:20AM

PART C: ENERGIZERS & TEAM-BUILDING ACTIVITIES TO SUPPORT YOUTH-ADULT PARTNERSHIPS

Grade 3: Module 1: Unit 3: Lesson 5 Jigsaw Groups and Planning for Paragraph Writing about Waiting for the Biblioburro

Science Fair Project Handbook

Briefing for Parents on SBB, DSA & PSLE

RETURNING TEACHER REQUIRED TRAINING MODULE YE TRANSCRIPT

Grade 3: Module 2B: Unit 3: Lesson 10 Reviewing Conventions and Editing Peers Work

Classroom Connections Examining the Intersection of the Standards for Mathematical Content and the Standards for Mathematical Practice

School Size and the Quality of Teaching and Learning

The Task. A Guide for Tutors in the Rutgers Writing Centers Written and edited by Michael Goeller and Karen Kalteissen

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability

Mathematics Program Assessment Plan

TCC Jim Bolen Math Competition Rules and Facts. Rules:

95723 Managing Disruptive Technologies

Lesson Plan. Preliminary Planning

Linking the Common European Framework of Reference and the Michigan English Language Assessment Battery Technical Report

MATH Study Skills Workshop

Sight Word Assessment

Algebra 1, Quarter 3, Unit 3.1. Line of Best Fit. Overview

WORK OF LEADERS GROUP REPORT

Mathematics Success Grade 7

Planning a Dissertation/ Project

Syllabus: INF382D Introduction to Information Resources & Services Spring 2013

Standardized Assessment & Data Overview December 21, 2015

Exams: Accommodations Guidelines. English Language Learners

Course Content Concepts

Diagnostic Test. Middle School Mathematics

Guide Decentralised selection procedure for the Bachelor s degree programme in Architecture, Urbanism and Building Sciences

Principal Survey FAQs

The Writing Process. The Academic Support Centre // September 2015

Curriculum Design Project with Virtual Manipulatives. Gwenanne Salkind. George Mason University EDCI 856. Dr. Patricia Moyer-Packenham

LS 406: Classroom Experience

Bitstrips for Schools: A How-To Guide

Aalya School. Parent Survey Results

Office Hours: Mon & Fri 10:00-12:00. Course Description

E C C. American Heart Association. Basic Life Support Instructor Course. Updated Written Exams. February 2016

Spring 2014 SYLLABUS Michigan State University STT 430: Probability and Statistics for Engineering

HUBBARD COMMUNICATIONS OFFICE Saint Hill Manor, East Grinstead, Sussex. HCO BULLETIN OF 11 AUGUST 1978 Issue I RUDIMENTS DEFINITIONS AND PATTER

Abu Dhabi Indian. Parent Survey Results

ESSENTIAL SKILLS PROFILE BINGO CALLER/CHECKER

P-4: Differentiate your plans to fit your students

Abu Dhabi Grammar School - Canada

Executive summary (in English)

CWSEI Teaching Practices Inventory

Enhancing Students Understanding Statistics with TinkerPlots: Problem-Based Learning Approach

Kendra Kilmer Texas A&M University - Department of Mathematics, Mailstop 3368 College Station, TX

State University of New York at Buffalo INTRODUCTION TO STATISTICS PSC 408 Fall 2015 M,W,F 1-1:50 NSC 210

IMPROVING ICT SKILLS OF STUDENTS VIA ONLINE COURSES. Rozita Tsoni, Jenny Pange University of Ioannina Greece

Course Name: Elementary Calculus Course Number: Math 2103 Semester: Fall Phone:

MTH 141 Calculus 1 Syllabus Spring 2017

Inquiry Learning Methodologies and the Disposition to Energy Systems Problem Solving

Consequences of Your Good Behavior Free & Frequent Praise

Listening to your members: The member satisfaction survey. Presenter: Mary Beth Watt. Outline

Unit 2. A whole-school approach to numeracy across the curriculum

Backwards Numbers: A Study of Place Value. Catherine Perez

AP Statistics Summer Assignment 17-18

Transcription:

University of Pittsburgh Office of Measurement and Evaluation of Teaching Dear Professor Cezar Lupu: Student Opinion of Teaching Questionnaire Results This form contains survey results for ADVANCED CALCULUS (MATH-0)-070. Attached is a report in PDF format containing your Student Opinion of Teaching Survey results from last term. The report is best viewed and/or printed in color. The evaluation results are broken down into three distinct categories. The first part of the report shows a breakdown of student responses to the quantitative questions. For each item, the number of students (n) who responded, the average or mean (av.) and standard deviation (dev.) are displayed next to a chart or histogram that shows the percentage of the class who responded to each option for that question. The percentages are above the number on the rating scale which increases from left to right, i.e. the number equals the least favorable rating and the number or (depending on the scale) equals the most favorable rating. The sum of percentages will equal 0. A red mark is displayed on the chart where the average or mean is located. To calculate how many students responded to each option, multiply the number of students who answered the question by the percentage for that option. For example, if students answered the question and responded to option then 7 students marked option for that item ( x.0 = 7). The standard deviation is a common measure of dispersion around the mean that may be useful in interpreting the results. If your school had previously calculated norms, they will be on OMET s website (omet.pitt.edu). The second part displays individual comments to each question in the open-ended section of the evaluation. All the responses to the first question will be listed together after the first question and then the responses to the next question will be listed together after the next question, and so on. The final part gives you a profile of the student responses to the quantitative section of the evaluation. This is a chart listing all of the means for the scaled items with a dashed red line connecting the means. If the number of respondents for any of the scaled items is fewer than seven, please be cautious in interpreting the quantitative results. Office of Measurement and Evaluation of Teaching (OMET)

Professor Cezar Lupu ADVANCED CALCULUS (MATH-0)-0706_UPITT_MATH_0_SEC070 Fall 0 9 RESPONDENTS = 6.9% OF NUMBER REGISTERED Professor Cezar Lupu, ADVANCED CALCULUS (MATH-0)-070. SELF RATINGS.) Did the recitations contribute to your learning in this course? Not at all.% av.=.89 dev.=0..) What grade do you expect in the course? A.6% B.% C.% D F Other Credit/No Entry Audit.) What grade do you expect in this recitation? A.6% B C D F Other Credit/No Entry Audit No Grade Given.%.) What percent of the recitations did you attend? Less than % 6- -7%.% 76-0 77.8%. COURSE AND RECITATION.) The material covered in recitation is well connected to the lectures. 0 av.= dev.=0 //0 Class Climate evaluation Page

Professor Cezar Lupu, ADVANCED CALCULUS (MATH-0)-070. RECITATION INSTRUCTOR TEACHING EVALUATION.) The recitation instructor was well-prepared for the recitations..% av.=.78 dev.=0.67.) The recitation instructor appeared knowledgeable about course subject matter..% av.=.89 dev.=0..) The recitation instructor clarified material covered in course lectures..% 77.8% av.=.78 dev.=0..) The recitation instructor showed interest in helping students understand the material..% av.=.89 dev.=0..) The recitation instructor returned assignments within a reasonable amount of time..% 77.8% av.=.78 dev.=0..6) The recitation instructor was concerned about students' progress in the course..% av.=.78 dev.=0.67.7) The recitation instructor provided helpful answers to students' questions..% av.=.89 dev.=0..8) The recitation instructor treated students with respect..% av.=.89 dev.=0..9) The recitation instructor provided constructive feedback on assignments..%.%.6% av.=. dev.=0.87.0) The recitation instructor maintained an environment in which students felt comfortable asking questions. 0 av.= dev.=0.) The recitation instructor was available for help outside of the labs. Mark (NA) if you did not seek outside help..% 8.7% n=7 av.=.7 dev.=0.76 ab.=.) The recitation instructor communicates effectively..% av.=.89 dev.=0. //0 Class Climate evaluation Page

Professor Cezar Lupu, ADVANCED CALCULUS (MATH-0)-070.) The recitation instructor comprehends students' communication..% av.=.89 dev.=0..) The recitation instructor led this recitation effectively..% av.=.89 dev.=0..) Would you recommend this recitation instructor to other students who are going to take this course? No n=7 Probably not Probably yes Yes 0. RECITATION COMMENTS.) Your recitation instructor would like to know if there is something you believe he/she has done especially well in teaching this recitation section. Cezar consistently goes above and beyond what is expected of him as a teaching assistant. He is extremely knowledgable and is able to communicate his thoughts effectively. I find the recitations very useful for the course work as well as preparation for the preliminary exams. In addition to recitations, Cezar also holds review sessions for our tests, which is not required, but very much appreciated. Furthermore, Cezar has taken the time to get to know the students and I truly appreciate it. I would recommend Cezar to anyone as a teaching assistant. Thank you Cezar for your help! You are an amazing instructor I really wish you would have taught the course entirely. The Best TA I've ever had! First, he really care if we understand the material well, if not, he will explain the question very carefully in detail! Second, He knows many useful tricks for doing analysis problems! And he always loves to share those tricks with us! Third, he volunteered to hold a - hours long review session for us before every exam! (Since we have midterms and one final, he really spends lots of time to prepare and do the review with us). His review session covers useful and important theorems and hard homework problems and lots of other interesting analysis problems which are all representative questions and usually with beautiful proofs. And his recitations and review sessions are very interactive! Finally, please let him be the next semester's TA! And thanks so much Cezar! The exam review sessions were a godsend. everything was great and so professional. dedicated man..) Your recitation instructor would also like to know what specific things you believe might be done to improve the teaching of this recitation section. Nothing really. Hope he could be this course's lecturer also! Lol Nothing! You care a lot about your students and it shows The only thing I could possibly comment on is sometimes our recitations will begin up to 0 minutes later than scheduled and with only having 0 minutes, the lateness cuts the recitations quite short. But, other than that small detail, I cannot think of anything else that could be improved. //0 Class Climate evaluation Page

Professor Cezar Lupu, ADVANCED CALCULUS (MATH-0)-070 Profile Subunit: Name of the instructor: Name of the course: (Name of the survey) A&S-MATH UPPER LEVEL Professor Cezar Lupu, ADVANCED CALCULUS (MATH-0)-070 (6_UPITT_MATH_0_SEC070) Values used in the profile line: Mean. SELF RATINGS.) Did the recitations contribute to your learning in this course? Not at all degree av.=.89 md=.00dev.=0.. COURSE AND RECITATION.) The material covered in recitation is well connected to the lectures. degree av.=.00 md=.00dev.=0.00. RECITATION INSTRUCTOR TEACHING EVALUATION.) The recitation instructor was well-prepared for the recitations..) The recitation instructor appeared knowledgeable about course subject matter..) The recitation instructor clarified material covered in course lectures..) The recitation instructor showed interest in helping students understand the material..) The recitation instructor returned assignments within a reasonable amount of time..6) The recitation instructor was concerned about students' progress in the course..7) The recitation instructor provided helpful answers to students' questions..8) The recitation instructor treated students with respect..9) The recitation instructor provided constructive feedback on assignments..0) The recitation instructor maintained an environment in which students felt comfortable asking questions..) The recitation instructor was available for help outside of the labs. Mark (NA) if you did not seek outside help..) The recitation instructor communicates effectively..) The recitation instructor comprehends students' communication..) The recitation instructor led this recitation effectively. degree av.=.78 md=.00dev.=0.67 degree av.=.89 md=.00dev.=0. degree av.=.78 md=.00dev.=0. degree av.=.89 md=.00dev.=0. degree av.=.78 md=.00dev.=0. degree av.=.78 md=.00dev.=0.67 degree av.=.89 md=.00dev.=0. degree av.=.89 md=.00dev.=0. degree av.=. md=.00dev.=0.87 degree av.=.00 md=.00dev.=0.00 degree n=7 av.=.7 md=.00dev.=0.76 degree av.=.89 md=.00dev.=0. degree av.=.89 md=.00dev.=0. degree av.=.89 md=.00dev.=0. //0 Class Climate evaluation Page