BOE Assessment Report November 17, 2014 Presented by Ryan Gupta Director of Curriculum and Instruction

Similar documents
Idaho Public Schools

TABLE OF CONTENTS Credit for Prior Learning... 74

Manasquan Elementary School State Proficiency Assessments. Spring 2012 Results

Junior Scheduling Assembly. February 22, 2017

Timeline. Recommendations

Standardized Assessment & Data Overview December 21, 2015

AB 167/216 Graduation. kids-alliance.org/programs/education. Alliance for Children s Rights

Welcome Parents! Class of 2021

EDINA SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL Registration Class of 2020

NORTH CAROLINA VIRTUAL PUBLIC SCHOOL IN WCPSS UPDATE FOR FALL 2007, SPRING 2008, AND SUMMER 2008

Colorado s Unified Improvement Plan for Schools for Online UIP Report

ADVANCED PLACEMENT STUDENTS IN COLLEGE: AN INVESTIGATION OF COURSE GRADES AT 21 COLLEGES. Rick Morgan Len Ramist

ONLINE COURSES. Flexibility to Meet Middle and High School Students at Their Point of Need

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS A $10.00 fee will be assessed for all computer education classes.

Course Description Guide. Table of Contents

College Entrance Testing:

Undergraduate Admissions Standards for the Massachusetts State University System and the University of Massachusetts. Reference Guide April 2016

International School of Kigali, Rwanda

2015 High School Results: Summary Data (Part I)

TREATMENT OF SMC COURSEWORK FOR STUDENTS WITHOUT AN ASSOCIATE OF ARTS

ADMISSION TO THE UNIVERSITY

Parent Academy. Common Core & PARCC

Have earned IB, AP, A-Level, French Baccalaureate or Equivalent

HIGH SCHOOL COURSE DESCRIPTION HANDBOOK

Chapter 4 Grading and Academic Standards

Welcome upcoming juniors! Course selection instructions for 11 th grade

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

EGRHS Course Fair. Science & Math AP & IB Courses

Roadmap to College: Highly Selective Schools

College and Career Ready Performance Index, High School, Grades 9-12

2012 New England Regional Forum Boston, Massachusetts Wednesday, February 1, More Than a Test: The SAT and SAT Subject Tests

Majors, Minors & Certificate Programs 34 The Majors 35 The Minors & Certificate Programs 36

Bachelor of Science. Undergraduate Program. Department of Physics

General Information. The Academic Program Guide should be reviewed carefully. As you make your course selections, it may be help-


Course Offerings SUBJECT AND COURSE REQUIREMENTS

ARTICULATION AGREEMENT

Spring Valley Academy Credit Flexibility Plan (CFP) Overview

Fashion Design Program Articulation

New Jersey Department of Education World Languages Model Program Application Guidance Document

WELCOME JUNIORS SENIOR YEAR SCHEDULING

YOUR FUTURE IN IB. Why is the International Baccalaureate a great choice for you? Mrs. Debbie Woolard IB Director Marietta High School

ACADEMIC AFFAIRS. Undergraduate Admissions. Transfer Center. Financial Aid. Veteran Services. Academic Policies. Requirements for Graduation

Testing for the Homeschooled High Schooler: SAT, ACT, AP, CLEP, PSAT, SAT II

Math Placement at Paci c Lutheran University

Annual Report to the Public. Dr. Greg Murry, Superintendent

International Advanced level examinations

INTRODUCTION ( MCPS HS Course Bulletin)

Humanitas A. San Fernando High School. Smaller Learning Community Plan. Azucena Hernandez, Redesign Team. Bob Stromoski, Redesign Team

ENGLISH LANGUAGE LEARNERS (ELL) UPDATE FOR SUNSHINE STATE TESOL 2013

Partners in education!

WINSTON CHURCHILL HIGH SCHOOL

World s Best Workforce Plan

Geneseo Senior High School Mission Statement

Geneseo Senior High School Mission Statement

Classroom Connections Examining the Intersection of the Standards for Mathematical Content and the Standards for Mathematical Practice

Miami Central Senior High School Academy of Finance

Data Diskette & CD ROM

ACADEMIC ALIGNMENT. Ongoing - Revised

PROGRAMS OF STUDY. Frankenmuth High School. 525 E. Genesee Street. Frankenmuth, Michigan 48734

Integrating Common Core Standards and CASAS Content Standards: Improving Instruction and Adult Learner Outcomes

UNITAS VERITAS CARITAS. St. Augustine High School CURRICULUM GUIDE 2018 INTERSESSION

CITY COLLEGE OF SAN FRANCISCO Transfer Credit Agreement Catalog

Course Catalog

B.S/M.A in Mathematics

Honors Mathematics. Introduction and Definition of Honors Mathematics

EAP. updates KHENG WAICHE. early proficiency programs coordinator

Introducing the New Iowa Assessments Mathematics Levels 12 14

DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY IN ARCHITECTURE

WINSTON CHURCHILL HIGH SCHOOL. 9 th Grade Registration Information

The Ohio State University. Colleges of the Arts and Sciences. Bachelor of Science Degree Requirements. The Aim of the Arts and Sciences

LOUISIANA HIGH SCHOOL RALLY ASSOCIATION

IB Diploma Subject Selection Brochure

Update on Standards and Educator Evaluation

Cooper Upper Elementary School

Queensborough Public Library (Queens, NY) CCSS Guidance for TASC Professional Development Curriculum

University of New Orleans

Saints Peter & Paul High School Master Book List

Admission and Readmission

PROGRAM GUIDE FOR 2018 GRADUATES ONLY

Writing Effective Program Learning Outcomes. Deborah Panter, J.D. Director of Educational Effectiveness & Assessment

Southern Union State Community College

The New York City Department of Education. Grade 5 Mathematics Benchmark Assessment. Teacher Guide Spring 2013

Harmony School of Advancement Harmony Public Schools Course Selection Guide

Heritage High School Home of the Coyotes. Class of 2017 Registration for Senior Classes

New Castle Area SD District Level Plan 07/01/ /30/2018

Fall Semester Year 1: 15 hours

2013 District STAR Coordinator Workshop

Special Education majors can be certified to teach grades 1-8 (MC-EA) and/or grades 6-12 (EA-AD). MC-EA and EA- AD are recommended.

Plattsburgh City School District SIP Building Goals

NC Global-Ready Schools

Audit Of Teaching Assignments. An Integrated Analysis of Teacher Educational Background and Courses Taught October 2007

Rosman High School. Course Description Guide for: Course and Career Planning Guide. 749 Pickens Hwy. Rosman, NC (828)

School Improvement Fieldbook A Guide to Support College and Career Ready Graduates School Improvement Plan

Vertical Teaming. in a small school

Dyersburg State Community College Austin Peay State University

Exemplar 6 th Grade Math Unit: Prime Factorization, Greatest Common Factor, and Least Common Multiple

Community College Equivalent

TEAM Evaluation Model Overview

Catalog Pasadena Campus 1539 East Howard Street Pasadena CA Tel: (626) Fax:(626)

Transcription:

Regional School District BOE Assessment Report November 17, 2014 Presented by Ryan Gupta Director of Curriculum and Instruction

STATE AND NATIONAL TEST DATES 2014-2015 School Year SAT ACT PARCC (PBA) PARCC (EOY) 2014: October 11, November 8, December 6 2015: January 24, March 14, May 2, June 6 2014: September 14, October 25, December 13 2015: February 7, April 18, June 13 MS: March 9-19, 2015 HS: March 2-6, 2015 MS: April 27 - May 4, 2015 HS: *May 18-21, 2015 *State recently approved district s waiver request AP May 4-15, 2015 NJBCT May 26-27, 2015 NJASK8 Science May 27, 2015 2

A LOOK BACK: 2013-2014 District Goals GOAL #1: IMPROVE STUDENT GROWTH & ACHIEVEMENT Objective Improve classroom instruction Raise academic expectations Improve AP Scores Activities - Fully implemented new teacher evaluation system (Danielson s Framework for Teaching) - Provided PD opportunities and support for teachers (workshops, conferences, summer training, etc.) - Developed, monitored, and assessed achievement of Student Growth Objectives (SGOs) - Aligned teacher-assigned grades with student knowledge and skill level - Emphasized critical thinking, analysis, and application in the classrooms and on assessments - Required cumulative and skills-based learning on major assessments - Implemented/mandated MS summer program for students who failed English and/or Math - Utilized test prep materials & strategies in AP classrooms - Required students to sign an AP Contract regarding commitment and expectations - Provided teachers up to 6 hours of out-of-school test prep sessions for their students - Provided teachers with AP training via College Board workshops 3

A LOOK BACK: 2013-2014 District Goals GOAL #1 (Cont ): IMPROVE STUDENT GROWTH & ACHIEVEMENT Objective Improve SAT scores Improve NJASK and HSPA scores Increase the communicative abilities of World Language students Activities - Offered after-school SAT practice through Study Island for Title I students - Incorporated SAT content and strategies into Math and L.A. curriculum - Incorporated SAT vocabulary into L.A. and S.S. curriculum and assessments - Organized a full online practice SAT exam for all juniors through College Board website - Offered students school/parent funded test-prep training during lunch periods though Estelle Finkel - Continued to offer Challenge and Boot Camps - Aligned lessons and assessments to CCSS - Utilized test prep materials & strategies - Emphasized communication in target language - Increased assessment of oral proficiency - Implemented STAMP assessment to properly place students - Began developing a theme-based curriculum with common benchmark assessments 4

NJASK 7 Language Arts Literacy (LAL) 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 Part. 11.8 12.5 14.4 22.3 16.7 18.6 64.5 60.0 62.0 65.8 62.1 55.1 Adv. 23.7 27.5 23.6 11.9 21.2 26.3 Prof. + Adv. Prof. % 88.2 87.5 85.6 77.7 83.3 81.4 5

ASK 7 Language Arts Results vs. DFG I Partially 19.5 22.3 +2.8 15.4 16.7 +1.3 16.3 18.6 +2.3 60.7 65.8 +5.1 60.2 62.1 +1.9 55.8 55.1-0.7 Advanced 19.7 11.9-7.8 24.5 21.2-3.3 27.9 26.3-1.6 6

ASK 7 Mathematics 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 Partially 16.0 24.6 14.1 23.7 20.8 18.6 53.7 50.0 45.4 49.0 47.4 44.6 Adv. 30.3 25.4 40.5 27.3 31.8 36.8 Prof. + Adv. Prof. % 84.0 75.4 85.9 76.3 79.2 81.4 7

ASK 7 Mathematics Results vs. DFG I Partially 19.2 23.7 +4.5 18.9 20.8 +1.9 16.1 18.6 +2.5 43.1 49.0 +5.9 39.7 47.4 +7.7 43.0 44.6 +1.6 Advanced 37.8 27.2-10.6 41.5 31.8-9.7 40.9 36.8-4.1 8

ASK 8 Language Arts Literacy 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 Partially 6.9 2.7 7.8 3.9 5.8 6.8 81.8 65.6 59.3 69.4 78.6 71.1 Adv. 11.3 31.6 32.9 26.7 15.5 22.1 Prof. + Adv. Prof. % 93.1 97.2 92.2 96.1 94.2 93.2 9

ASK 8 Language Arts Results vs. DFG I Partially 6.0 3.9-2.1 6.5 5.8-0.7 7.0 6.8-0.2 67.7 69.4 +1.7 72.6 78.6 +6.0 70.0 71.1 +1.1 Advanced 26.3 26.7 +0.4 21.0 15.5-5.5 22.9 22.1-0.8 10

ASK 8 Mathematics 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 Partially 22.3 19.2 11.3 6.8 15.6 6.1 41.2 41.9 46.5 38.0 42.2 35.7 Adv. 36.5 38.8 42.2 55.2 42.2 58.2 Prof. + Adv. Prof. % 77.7 80.7 88.7 93.2 84.4 93.9 11

ASK 8 Mathematics Results vs. DFG I Partially 12.9 6.8-6.1 15.1 15.6 +0.5 13.1 6.1-7.0 40.2 38.0-2.2 37.9 42.2 +4.3 34.5 35.7 +1.2 Advanced 46.9 55.2 +8.3 47.0 42.2-4.8 52.4 58.2 +5.8 12

ASK 8 Science 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 Partially 6.2 4.8 6.0 4.7 7.1 6.5 55.6 41.6 53.2 44.8 43.4 49.2 Adv. 38.2 53.6 40.8 50.5 49.5 44.3 Prof. + Adv. Prof. % 93.8 95.2 94.0 95.3 92.9 93.5 13

ASK 8 Science Results vs. DFG I Partially 5.6 4.7-0.9 7.0 7.1 +0.1 7.4 6.5-0.9 43.4 44.8 +1.4 41.4 43.4 +2.0 47.3 49.2 +1.9 Advanced 51.0 50.5-0.5 51.6 49.5-2.1 45.3 44.3-2.0 14

HSPA Language Arts Literacy 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 Partially 6.0 3.8 4.1 2.7 2.2 1.2 65.6 62.7 62.6 69.0 54.6 51.9 Adv. 28.4 33.5 33.3 28.3 43.2 46.9 Prof. + Adv. Prof. % 94.0 96.2 95.9 97.3 97.8 98.8 15

HSPA Language Arts Results vs. DFG I 10-11 10-11 Avg. 10-11 Avg. Avg. Avg. Partially 3.4 4.1 +0.7 2.7 2.7 +0.0 2.6 2.2-0.4 1.9 1.2 +0.7 59.4 62.6 +3.2 59.4 69.0 +9.6 52.1 54.6 +2.5 43.1 51.9 +8.8 Advanced 37.1 33.3-3.8 38.0 28.3-9.7 45.4 43.2-2.0 55.1 46.9-8.2 16

HSPA Mathematics 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 Partially 16.5 12.2 13.2 10.0 4.1 5.8 43.7 49.8 53.1 48.3 44.6 52.7 Adv. 39.8 38.0 33.7 41.7 51.3 41.5 Prof. + Adv. Prof. % 83.5 87.8 86.8 90.0 95.9 94.2 17

HSPA Mathematics Results vs. DFG I 10-11 10-11 Avg. 10-11 Avg. Avg. Avg. Partially 11.1 13.2 +2.1 8.9 10.0 +1.1 8.6 4.1-4.5 8.2 5.8 +2.7 45.5 53.1 +7.6 44.4 48.3 +3.9 44.4 44.6 +2.2 41.8 52.7 +10.9 Advanced 43.4 33.7-9.7 46.7 41.7-5.0 46.7 51.3 +4.6 50.0 41.5-8.5 18

NJBCT End of Course Biology Exam 2010-2011 2011-2012 2012-2013 2013-2014 Partially 21.2 18.0 26.4 16.8 42.4 60.5 48.8 44.7 Advanced 36.4 21.5 24.8 38.5 Prof. + Adv. 78.8 82.0 73.6 83.2 Students are NOT required to pass the NJBCT for graduation. 19

NJBCT End of Course Biology Results vs. DFG I Partially 20.3 18.0-2.3 19.0 26.4 +7.4 17.4 16.8-0.6 52.4 60.5 +8.1 47.3 48.8 +1.5 49.1 44.7-4.4 Advanced 27.3 21.5-5.8 33.7 24.8-8.9 33.5 38.5 +5.0 20

SAT Verbal, Mathematics, Writing Total Student 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 Reading 526 526 516 515 531 526 513 508 507 528 Mathematics 548 551 554 547 554 555 549 538 539 562 Reading + Mathematics 1074 1077 1070 1062 1085 1081 1062 1046 1046 1090 *Writing n/a 530 532 525 532 537 528 527 523 548 Reading + Math + Writing n/a 1607 1602 1587 1617 1618 1590 1573 1569 1638 21

Annual Participation & Performance on AP Exams 2009 *2010 2011 **2012 *2013 *2014 Total AP enrollment 374 377 419 436 491 568 # of AP Exams taken 300 355 317 341 453 545 % of Students who took the exam # of Students enrolled in 1 or more AP courses # of AP Students with Scores of 3 or better 80.2% 94.2% 75.7% 78.2% 92.3% 95.8% 153 156 142 155 198 221 116 118 126 132 167 188 % of Total AP Students with Scores of 3 or better 75.8% 75.6% 88.7% 85.2% 84.3% 85.1% 22 *Students were required to take the AP exam or received Honors weighting. **In 2012, however, seniors who did not take the exam were unaffected by the Honors weighting.

23 AP Exam Scores by Subject Scores Total # Subject Areas 5 4 3 2 1 Exams Art History 0 0 4 1 0 5 Biology 1 3 6 2 0 12 Calculus AB 10 8 5 2 0 25 Calculus BC 7 3 1 0 2 13 Chemistry 2 2 1 2 0 7 Computer Science A 0 3 1 1 1 6 English Language and Composition 12 34 17 4 0 67 English Literature and Composition 12 13 4 0 0 29 Environmental Science 4 15 7 2 3 31 European History 3 9 14 2 2 30 French Language 0 0 2 2 1 5 Italian Language and Culture 2 1 8 12 1 24 Latin: Vergil 0 1 0 0 0 1 Macroeconomics 4 13 14 8 5 44 Microeconomics (new) 3 9 19 6 5 42 Music Theory (new) 2 2 2 0 0 6 Physics B 12 3 0 0 0 15 Physics C (not offered) 2 1 0 0 0 3 Psychology (not offered) 0 2 0 1 0 3 Spanish Language 2 8 2 2 0 14 Statistics 6 13 8 6 1 34 Studio Art: Drawing Portfolio 0 4 4 1 0 9 United States Government and Politics 10 19 22 14 3 68 United States History 19 21 11 0 0 51 World History (Independent Study) 0 0 1 0 0 1 Overall Average Score: 3.55

24 Objectives Improve classroom instruction Raise academic expectations Improve SAT scores Prepare for state implementation of PARCC assessment Moving Forward: 2014-2015 CONTINUE TO IMPROVE STUDENT GROWTH & ACHIEVEMENT Suggested Activities - Provide continued training on Danielson rubric - Develop, monitor, and assess achievement of Student Growth Objectives - Provide teachers opportunity to observe their colleagues - Provide greater access to technology to facilitate teaching and learning - Align teacher-assigned grades with student knowledge and skill level - Emphasize critical thinking, analysis and application (Danielson, CCSS, PARCC) - Require cumulative and skills-based learning on major assessments - Provide teachers time for vertical and horizontal articulation - Expand after-school program for Title I eligible MS students - Expand mandatory summer school program at the MS to remediate failing students - Continue to implement an online full-length practice SAT exam for all juniors - Continue to offer an SAT Prep program during common lunch period - Increase utilization of Sadlier online vocabulary program - Emphasize SAT Math skills in students respective subject areas - Coordinate a district-wide PARCC practice exam for students in tested areas: English 7-11, Math 7, Math 8, Algebra, Geometry, Algebra II - Align lessons and assessments to PARCC (multiple correct answers, multiple sources, justify responses, cross-curricular content, online assessments ) - Utilize PARCC s online resources, tutorials, strategies and other materials - Communicate the implementation and expectations of PARCC to staff, students, and parents

Any questions? Comments? THANK YOU! 25