Listening Mark Scheme

Similar documents
Candidates must achieve a grade of at least C2 level in each examination in order to achieve the overall qualification at C2 Level.

5. UPPER INTERMEDIATE

CEFR Overall Illustrative English Proficiency Scales

Think A F R I C A when assessing speaking. C.E.F.R. Oral Assessment Criteria. Think A F R I C A - 1 -

Myths, Legends, Fairytales and Novels (Writing a Letter)

Opportunities for Writing Title Key Stage 1 Key Stage 2 Narrative

November 2012 MUET (800)

TRAITS OF GOOD WRITING

Loughton School s curriculum evening. 28 th February 2017

What the National Curriculum requires in reading at Y5 and Y6

CELTA. Syllabus and Assessment Guidelines. Third Edition. University of Cambridge ESOL Examinations 1 Hills Road Cambridge CB1 2EU United Kingdom

The College Board Redesigned SAT Grade 12

PAGE(S) WHERE TAUGHT If sub mission ins not a book, cite appropriate location(s))

ENGLISH. Progression Chart YEAR 8

Teachers Guide Chair Study

Facing our Fears: Reading and Writing about Characters in Literary Text

Lower and Upper Secondary

Arizona s English Language Arts Standards th Grade ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION HIGH ACADEMIC STANDARDS FOR STUDENTS

Rubric for Scoring English 1 Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis

Coast Academies Writing Framework Step 4. 1 of 7

This publication is also available for download at

Oakland Unified School District English/ Language Arts Course Syllabus

LITERACY ACROSS THE CURRICULUM POLICY

Achievement Level Descriptors for American Literature and Composition

Reading Project. Happy reading and have an excellent summer!

Reading Grammar Section and Lesson Writing Chapter and Lesson Identify a purpose for reading W1-LO; W2- LO; W3- LO; W4- LO; W5-

MYP Language A Course Outline Year 3

Primary English Curriculum Framework

Language Acquisition Chart

National Literacy and Numeracy Framework for years 3/4

English 491: Methods of Teaching English in Secondary School. Identify when this occurs in the program: Senior Year (capstone course), week 11

ANGLAIS LANGUE SECONDE

EXAMPLES OF SPEAKING PERFORMANCES AT CEF LEVELS A2 TO C2. (Taken from Cambridge ESOL s Main Suite exams)

The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages p. 58 to p. 82

Student Name: OSIS#: DOB: / / School: Grade:

Handbook for Teachers

Sign languages and the Common European Framework of References for Languages

BENGKEL 21ST CENTURY LEARNING DESIGN PERINGKAT DAERAH KUNAK, 2016

California Department of Education English Language Development Standards for Grade 8

Assessing speaking skills:. a workshop for teacher development. Ben Knight

One Stop Shop For Educators

CREATE YOUR OWN INFOMERCIAL

5 th Grade Language Arts Curriculum Map

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes Gold 2000 Correlated to Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards, (Grade 9)

Introduction to the Common European Framework (CEF)

The Effect of Extensive Reading on Developing the Grammatical. Accuracy of the EFL Freshmen at Al Al-Bayt University

Grade 11 Language Arts (2 Semester Course) CURRICULUM. Course Description ENGLISH 11 (2 Semester Course) Duration: 2 Semesters Prerequisite: None

Text Type Purpose Structure Language Features Article

Spanish IV Textbook Correlation Matrices Level IV Standards of Learning Publisher: Pearson Prentice Hall

FOR TEACHERS ONLY. The University of the State of New York REGENTS HIGH SCHOOL EXAMINATION. ENGLISH LANGUAGE ARTS (Common Core)

TABE 9&10. Revised 8/2013- with reference to College and Career Readiness Standards

Comprehension Recognize plot features of fairy tales, folk tales, fables, and myths.

Statistical Analysis of Climate Change, Renewable Energies, and Sustainability An Independent Investigation for Introduction to Statistics

Prentice Hall Literature: Timeless Voices, Timeless Themes, Platinum 2000 Correlated to Nebraska Reading/Writing Standards (Grade 10)

English Language Arts Missouri Learning Standards Grade-Level Expectations

Number of students enrolled in the program in Fall, 2011: 20. Faculty member completing template: Molly Dugan (Date: 1/26/2012)

Dublin City Schools Broadcast Video I Graded Course of Study GRADES 9-12

Oakland Unified School District English/ Language Arts Course Syllabus

Grade 4. Common Core Adoption Process. (Unpacked Standards)

C a l i f o r n i a N o n c r e d i t a n d A d u l t E d u c a t i o n. E n g l i s h a s a S e c o n d L a n g u a g e M o d e l

Intensive English Program Southwest College

Subject: Opening the American West. What are you teaching? Explorations of Lewis and Clark

ELPAC. Practice Test. Kindergarten. English Language Proficiency Assessments for California

Common Core State Standards for English Language Arts

PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF EDISON TOWNSHIP DIVISION OF CURRICULUM AND INSTRUCTION LLD LANGUAGE ARTS

Supervised Agriculture Experience Suffield Regional 2013

5 Star Writing Persuasive Essay

A Correlation of. Grade 6, Arizona s College and Career Ready Standards English Language Arts and Literacy

4 Almost always mention the topic and the overall idea of simple. 3 Oftentimes mention the topic and the overall idea of simple

Nancy Hennessy M.Ed. 1

Pearson Longman Keystone Book D 2013

Paraprofessional Evaluation: School Year:

Florida Reading Endorsement Alignment Matrix Competency 1

Prentice Hall Literature Common Core Edition Grade 10, 2012

Literature and the Language Arts Experiencing Literature

Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium: Brief Write Rubrics. October 2015

ELA/ELD Standards Correlation Matrix for ELD Materials Grade 1 Reading

The Eaquals Self-help Guide for Curriculum and Syllabus Design Maria Matheidesz and Frank Heyworth

DRA Correlated to Connecticut English Language Arts Curriculum Standards Grade-Level Expectations Grade 4

Writing a composition

Grade 5: Module 3A: Overview

GENERAL COMMENTS Some students performed well on the 2013 Tamil written examination. However, there were some who did not perform well.

South Carolina English Language Arts

CARITAS PROJECT GRADING RUBRIC

Correspondence between the DRDP (2015) and the California Preschool Learning Foundations. Foundations (PLF) in Language and Literacy

Program Matrix - Reading English 6-12 (DOE Code 398) University of Florida. Reading

How long did... Who did... Where was... When did... How did... Which did...

Analyzing Linguistically Appropriate IEP Goals in Dual Language Programs

Guidelines for Writing an Internship Report

Monticello Community School District K 12th Grade. Spanish Standards and Benchmarks

Evidence-Centered Design: The TOEIC Speaking and Writing Tests

Dickinson ISD ELAR Year at a Glance 3rd Grade- 1st Nine Weeks

Mercer County Schools

Intensive Writing Class

Abbey Academies Trust. Every Child Matters

Big Fish. Big Fish The Book. Big Fish. The Shooting Script. The Movie

Scoring Guide for Candidates For retake candidates who began the Certification process in and earlier.

Taught Throughout the Year Foundational Skills Reading Writing Language RF.1.2 Demonstrate understanding of spoken words,

Transcription:

NOCN ESOL International Listening Level C2 Proficient User LIVE 2017 Examination Mark Scheme Listening Mark Scheme PART Question Answer PART Question Answer 1 1 a 3.1 1 a 1 2 c 3.1 2 c 1 3 b 3.1 3 b 1 4 c 3.1 4 c 1 5 a 3.1 5 a 1 6 c 3.1 6 a 1 7 a 3.2 1 b 1 8 b 3.2 2 c 1 9 a 3.2 3 a 1 10 b 3.2 4 c 2.1 1 a 3.2 5 a 2.1 2 b 2.1 3 b 2.1 4 c 2.1 5 c 2.2 1 b 2.2 2 a 2.2 3 b 2.2 4 a 2.2 5 c Total 31 ESOL International Listening Level C2 Proficient User Mark Scheme LIVE 2017 Version 1.0 Page 1 of 1

NOCN ESOL International Reading Examination Mark Scheme Level C2 Proficient User LIVE 2017 Reading Mark Scheme Part Question Answer Part Question Answer 1 1 a 3 21 a 1 2 c 3 22 c 1 3 b 3 23 b 1 4 a 3 24 c 1 5 c 3 25 b 1 6 a 4 26 c 1 7 a 4 27 a 1 8 b 4 28 b 1 9 b 4 29 a 1 10 b 4 30 c 2 11 a 4 31 b 2 12 b 2 13 c 2 14 a 2 15 a 2 16 c 2 17 b 2 18 a 2 19 c 2 20 b Total 31 ESOL International Level C1 Advanced User Reading Mark Scheme LIVE 2017 Version 1.0 Page 1 of 1

TASK 1: 200 250 WORDS AND TASK 2: 250 300 WORDS Points range from 0-12 Marks 3 2 1 0 Range of Vocabulary and Spelling Learner uses a variety of vocabulary to communicate ideas, impressions, feelings and opinions clearly. Vocabulary meets purpose and idioms are used naturally throughout. Specialised vocabulary is used correctly with 80% accuracy of spelling unfamiliar words Learner demonstrates some use of vocabulary to communicate ideas, impressions, feelings and opinions but not always clearly. Some use of idioms is used but not always naturally. Spelling basic vocabulary is correct, although spelling errors do occur in complex structures but these do not exceed 30%. Learner demonstrates limited use of appropriate vocabulary to communicate ideas, impressions, feelings and opinions. Choice of vocabulary is limited and many errors in spelling complex words (40%). Accuracy and Grammar Format Learner produces text using appropriate tenses and word order, complex structures, subordinate clauses and a variety of tenses in active and passive forms. 1-2 errors in sentence structures and grammar, but comprehension not impeded. Learner demonstrates high awareness of the task and ability to use a wide range of formats covering a range of functions. Effective use of paragraphing shows logical cohesion and organisation of ideas. Well punctuated and overall consistent style. Learner produces text where occasional structural errors occur and punctuation and tenses are not always accurate, however comprehension is not impeded. 30% of errors occur with more complex grammatical forms. Learner demonstrates awareness of the task and can uses appropriate language for different functions and a range of formats, though this may not be consistent throughout the text. 30% of errors occur. Paragraphs show logical cohesion and organisation of ideas most of the time. Well punctuated. Learner demonstrates an Learner demonstrates some Content understanding and awareness understanding and awareness of the of task and content is relevant task. Some evidence of presenting with coherently linked ideas. an argument, although key points Uses well rounded cogent may not be fully elaborated. Learner expanding on key points for understands the question but complex and abstract subjects. response limited in depth and ideas Linguistic markers used to give not written at length. Able to opinions and elaborated maintain expression and argument, answers. Writing is tidy and but key points may not be fully legible. emphasised or expanded. The learner will be required to complete TWO TASKS at C2 Learner produces text with errors in tense forms, punctuation and word order. Comprehension is impeded in some instances. 40% of errors occur in more complex grammatical forms. Learner demonstrates a limited awareness of the task, its function and text type. Argument is not coherently expressed and lacking detail. 40% of errors occur. Paragraphs do not always show logical cohesion and organisation of ideas but are fairly well punctuated. Learner demonstrates limited understanding and awareness of the task yet understands the question. Unable to execute an effective answer and arguments are not coherently expressed as insufficient detail is presented. However, an answer is attempted on some aspects of the task Untidy, illegible writing. Illegible text and incorrect use of vocabulary throughout for expressing and communicating ideas, impressions, feelings and opinions. Spelling is weak; 50% misspellings in unfamiliar vocabulary. C2 writing is unaccomplished. Final product is insufficient. Learner does not produce a comprehensible text. Several errors in punctuation. Little or no understanding of grammatical forms and tenses are inaccurate throughout 50% and above. Learner does not produce text relevant to the context of the task. No demonstration of the awareness of language function and range of formats. No evidence of paragraphing to show logical organisation of ideas. Format is inappropriate to the context. Learner does not produce text relevant to the context of the task. No understanding or awareness of the task requirements. Attempted answer does not fully meet the word count required and is incomplete. Untidy and illegible writing.

NOCN ESOL International Speaking Level C2 Proficient LIVE WINTER 2017 Mark Scheme Part 1 - Personal information A learner should be awarded one mark for every accurate response. Grammar and pronunciation are not assessed at this stage. One or two errors are permitted which could be self-corrected or do not impede comprehension. Total marks for Part 1 is 9. Question Number of marks Learner Score 1. 1 2. 3 3. 1 4. 3 5. 1 Total Marks /9 ESOL International Level C2 Proficient Speaking Mark Scheme LIVE WINTER 2017 Version 1.0 Page 1 of 3

NOCN ESOL International Speaking Level C2 Proficient LIVE WINTER 2017 Mark Scheme Part 2 - Responding to the situation / general use of English in formal and informal environments The purpose is to differentiate between formal/informal register, to assess accuracy and grammar appropriate for Level C2 and assess learner s pronunciation. Skills 3 marks 2 marks 1 mark 0 marks Register Accuracy Pronunciation Effective communication Clear distinction between formal and informal situations is made throughout. Learner shows confidence throughout. A high degree of accuracy in the use of complex grammatical structures is maintained throughout. One or two errors are made which are selfcorrected or do not impede comprehension. Stress, pronunciation and intonation are used naturally in connected speech to convey finer shades of meaning, highlighting, emphasising and modifying meaning. Clarity of interaction with natural use of discourse organisation, connectors and cohesive devices. Confident in management of turn taking. Distinction between formal and informal situations is mainly maintained throughout. Mainly confident. Occasional errors are made but most are selfcorrected. Meaning is not impeded. Some evidence of the use of stress, pronunciation and intonation is demonstrated lapses to convey finer points of meaning. Mainly controlled use of discourse organisation, connectors and cohesive devices errors. Able to backtrack when encountering difficulty. Distinction between formal/informal situations is not fully made throughout. Some degree of confidence shown. Lack of accuracy occasionally impedes the meaning. Most errors are selfcorrected but not all. Largely connected speech where stress, pronunciation and intonation is used but does not convey shades of meaning. Limited evidence of discourse organisation and use of connectors and cohesive devices. Limited evidence of using appropriate turn taking conventions. Learner does not maintain a clear distinction between formal and informal situations throughout. Lacks confidence. A significant number of errors which are not corrected. Learner s speech is monotonous, and some errors in pronunciation. Minimal discourse organisation and appropriate turn taking management. ESOL International Level C2 Proficient Speaking Mark Scheme LIVE WINTER 2017 Version 1.0 Page 2 of 3

NOCN ESOL International Speaking Level C2 Proficient LIVE WINTER 2017 Mark Scheme Part 3 - Discussion The purpose of Part 3 is to demonstrate comprehension and fluency of speaking with an application of accurate grammar and pronunciation. Skill 3 marks 2 marks 1 mark 0 marks Use of vocabulary Accuracy and grammar Pronunciation Listening and responding Uses complex sentences, idiomatic expressions and colloquialisms naturally. Able to provide sophisticated explanations, narratives, ideas and opinions and come to a conclusion. A high degree of accuracy in the use of complex grammatical structures is maintained throughout. One or two errors are made which are selfcorrected or do not impede comprehension. Stress, pronunciation and intonation are used naturally in connected speech to convey finer shades of meaning, highlighting, emphasising and modifying meaning. Engages in discussion to express and elicit opinion, defend and justify arguments when challenged. Able to persuade someone to a point of view. Some use of complex sentences, idiomatic expressions and colloquialisms. Able to qualify opinions and statements but not always without hesitation. Occasional errors are made but most are selfcorrected. Meaning is not impeded. Some evidence of the use of stress, pronunciation and intonation is demonstrated lapses to convey finer points of meaning. Clear interaction errors in understanding or giving responses. Arguments and opinions not always clearly made or justified. Minimal use of complex sentences. Occasional errors in the use of vocabulary. Occasionally has to search to find the right word. Lack of accuracy occasionally impedes the meaning. Most errors are selfcorrected but not all. Largely connected speech where stress, pronunciation and intonation is used but does not convey shades of meaning. Some evidence of detailed and clear responses to others. Limited evidence of detailed arguments and opinions. Very limited use of complex sentences. Repetitive and limited vocabulary. A significant number of errors which are not corrected. Learner s speech is monotonous and some errors in pronunciation. Very limited interaction to show any evidence of being able to give and defend arguments and opinions. ESOL International Level C2 Proficient Speaking Mark Scheme LIVE WINTER 2017 Version 1.0 Page 3 of 3