Kansas Licensure Program Standards for Building Level Leadership

Similar documents
California Professional Standards for Education Leaders (CPSELs)

Field Experience and Internship Handbook Master of Education in Educational Leadership Program

STANDARDS AND RUBRICS FOR SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT 2005 REVISED EDITION

Position Statements. Index of Association Position Statements

NORTH CAROLINA STATE BOARD OF EDUCATION Policy Manual

The Mission of Teacher Education in a Center of Pedagogy Geared to the Mission of Schooling in a Democratic Society.

Davidson College Library Strategic Plan

The 21st Century Principal

School Leadership Rubrics

Lincoln School Kathmandu, Nepal

KENTUCKY FRAMEWORK FOR TEACHING

Social Emotional Learning in High School: How Three Urban High Schools Engage, Educate, and Empower Youth

Volunteer State Community College Strategic Plan,

2 Organizational. The University of Alaska System has six (6) Statewide Offices as displayed in Organizational Chart 2 1 :

Governors and State Legislatures Plan to Reauthorize the Elementary and Secondary Education Act

July 17, 2017 VIA CERTIFIED MAIL. John Tafaro, President Chatfield College State Route 251 St. Martin, OH Dear President Tafaro:

Additional Qualification Course Guideline Computer Studies, Specialist

Residency Principal and Program Administrator Internship and Certification Handbook

Innovating Toward a Vibrant Learning Ecosystem:

Lied Scottsbluff Public Library Strategic Plan

University of Delaware Library STRATEGIC PLAN

Strategic Planning for Retaining Women in Undergraduate Computing

ASSISTANT DIRECTOR OF SCHOOLS (K 12)

Statewide Strategic Plan for e-learning in California s Child Welfare Training System

Mary Washington 2020: Excellence. Impact. Distinction.

Focus on. Learning THE ACCREDITATION MANUAL 2013 WASC EDITION

State Parental Involvement Plan

Classroom Teacher Primary Setting Job Description

Head of Music Job Description. TLR 2c

SPECIALIST PERFORMANCE AND EVALUATION SYSTEM

Assistant Director of African American/Black Student Support & Success Posting Details

GUIDE TO EVALUATING DISTANCE EDUCATION AND CORRESPONDENCE EDUCATION

Superintendent s 100 Day Entry Plan Review

UoS - College of Business Administration. Master of Business Administration (MBA)

Title II of WIOA- Adult Education and Family Literacy Activities 463 Guidance

Dakar Framework for Action. Education for All: Meeting our Collective Commitments. World Education Forum Dakar, Senegal, April 2000

eportfolio Guide Missouri State University

Assumption University Five-Year Strategic Plan ( )

Program Guidebook. Endorsement Preparation Program, Educational Leadership

INFORMATION PACKAGE FOR PRINCIPAL SAINTS CATHOLIC COLLEGE JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY

Swinburne University of Technology 2020 Plan

Marketing Committee Terms of Reference

CORRELATION FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION INSTRUCTIONAL MATERIALS CORRELATION COURSE STANDARDS / BENCHMARKS. 1 of 16

Wide Open Access: Information Literacy within Resource Sharing

ESTABLISHING A TRAINING ACADEMY. Betsy Redfern MWH Americas, Inc. 380 Interlocken Crescent, Suite 200 Broomfield, CO

2013/Q&PQ THE SOUTH AFRICAN QUALIFICATIONS AUTHORITY

Scoring Guide for Candidates For retake candidates who began the Certification process in and earlier.

LEAD AGENCY MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING

2020 Strategic Plan for Diversity and Inclusive Excellence. Six Terrains

1GOOD LEADERSHIP IS IMPORTANT. Principal Effectiveness and Leadership in an Era of Accountability: What Research Says

Program Change Proposal:

Strategic Plan SJI Strategic Plan 2016.indd 1 4/14/16 9:43 AM

An Introduction to LEAP

ADDENDUM 2016 Template - Turnaround Option Plan (TOP) - Phases 1 and 2 St. Lucie Public Schools

A Systems Approach to Principal and Teacher Effectiveness From Pivot Learning Partners

Self Assessment. InTech Collegiate High School. Jason Stanger, Director 1787 Research Park Way North Logan, UT

Understanding Co operatives Through Research

TEACHING QUALITY: SKILLS. Directive Teaching Quality Standard Applicable to the Provision of Basic Education in Alberta

National and Regional performance and accountability: State of the Nation/Region Program Costa Rica.

Academic Dean Evaluation by Faculty & Unclassified Professionals

Alvin Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

Minnesota s Consolidated State Plan Under the Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA)

Document number: 2013/ Programs Committee 6/2014 (July) Agenda Item 42.0 Bachelor of Engineering with Honours in Software Engineering

CONNECTICUT GUIDELINES FOR EDUCATOR EVALUATION. Connecticut State Department of Education

La Grange Park Public Library District Strategic Plan of Service FY 2014/ /16. Our Vision: Enriching Lives

$0/5&/5 '"$*-*5"503 %"5" "/"-:45 */4536$5*0/"- 5&$)/0-0(: 41&$*"-*45 EVALUATION INSTRUMENT. &valuation *nstrument adopted +VOF

Multicultural Education: Perspectives and Theory. Multicultural Education by Dr. Chiu, Mei-Wen

FORT HAYS STATE UNIVERSITY AT DODGE CITY

Strategic Plan Dashboard

Regional Bureau for Education in Africa (BREDA)

PROPOSAL FOR NEW UNDERGRADUATE PROGRAM. Institution Submitting Proposal. Degree Designation as on Diploma. Title of Proposed Degree Program

Priorities for CBHS Draft 8/22/17

SSTATE SYSIP STEMIC IMPROVEMENT PL A N APRIL 2016

Workload Policy Department of Art and Art History Revised 5/2/2007

A Strategic Plan for the Law Library. Washington and Lee University School of Law Introduction

SCRANTONONESTRATEGIC PLAN Working Together for a Brighter Future

Committee to explore issues related to accreditation of professional doctorates in social work

San Diego State University Division of Undergraduate Studies Sustainability Center Sustainability Center Assistant Position Description

A Framework for Safe and Successful Schools

Promotion and Tenure Guidelines. School of Social Work

University of Colorado Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences Programmatic Evaluation Plan

Higher Education Review (Embedded Colleges) of Navitas UK Holdings Ltd. Hertfordshire International College

Productive partnerships to promote media and information literacy for knowledge societies: IFLA and UNESCO s collaborative work

Constant Contact Survey Results

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

SECTION I: Strategic Planning Background and Approach

FOM Dean's Office. A look inside

DAS-REMI District Accountability System Reporting, Evaluating, and Monitoring Instrument for the P2E2020SBP

Santa Fe Community College Teacher Academy Student Guide 1

CREATING SAFE AND INCLUSIVE SCHOOLS: A FRAMEWORK FOR SELF-ASSESSMENT. Created by: Great Lakes Equity Center

MSW POLICY, PLANNING & ADMINISTRATION (PP&A) CONCENTRATION

Manchester Essex Regional Schools District Improvement Plan Three Year Plan

COMMUNICATION PLAN. We believe that all individuals are valuable and worthy of respect.

Final Teach For America Interim Certification Program

Frequently Asked Questions Archdiocesan Collaborative Schools (ACS)

The University of North Carolina Strategic Plan Online Survey and Public Forums Executive Summary

DEPARTMENT OF PHILOSOPHY: PER COURSE TEACHING POSITIONS Spring, 2017

SECTION 1: SOLES General Information FACULTY & PERSONNEL HANDBOOK

SHARED LEADERSHIP. Building Student Success within a Strong School Community

How Might the Common Core Standards Impact Education in the Future?

Transcription:

Kansas Licensure Program Standards for Building Level Leadership Note. Stakeholder refers hereafter to those groups or individuals who can affect, or are affected by, the achievement of the Kansas public schools (Freeman, 1984) including key members from home, school and community circles/spheres. Standard 1: Shared School Vision of Learning: An education leader at the building level applies knowledge that promotes the success of every student by facilitating the development, articulation, implementation, and stewardship of a vision for high expectations of learning that is shared and supported by all stakeholders. Function 1: Collaborate: Candidates understand and can collaboratively develop, articulate, implement, and steward a shared vision of learning for a school. 1.1.1 processes for guiding collaborative school visioning using a variety of resources theories relevant to building, articulating, implementing, and stewarding a school vision methods for involving diverse school stakeholders in the visioning process aligning school vision, mission, and goals to, district, state, and federal policies such as content standards and achievement targets 1.1.2 support a collaborative process for developing and implementing a school vision articulate a school vision of learning characterized by a respect for students and their families and community partnerships develop a comprehensive plan for communicating the school vision to appropriate school constituencies formulate plans to steward school vision statements Function 2: Data Analysis: Candidates understand and can collect and use data to identify school goals, assess organizational effectiveness, and create and implement plans to achieve school goals. 1.2.1 the design and use of assessment data for learning 1.2.2 develop and use evidence-centered research strategies and strategic organizational effectiveness and learning strategies planning processes create school-based strategic and tactical and strategic program planning tactical goals implementation and evaluation of school improvement processes collaboratively develop implementation plans to achieve those goals variables that affect student achievement lead process for developing a school improvement plan that aligns to district improvement plans Building Leadership 1

Function 3: Sustainability: Candidates understand and can promote continual and sustainable school improvement. 1.3.1 continual and sustained improvement models and processes 1.3.2 identify strategies or practices to build organizational capacity that promote school change processes for continual and sustainable improvement continuous and sustainable school improvement role of professional learning in continual and sustainable school improvement design processes for transformational change plan at the school-building-level when needed oversee a comprehensive, building-level professional development program Function 4: Evaluation: Candidates understand and can evaluate school progress and revise school plans supported by school stakeholders. 1.4.1 effective strategies for engaging diverse staff and community in monitoring the implementation, revision of plans to achieve school improvement goals, and program evaluation models 1.4.2 develop a school plan to monitor program development and implementation of school goals construct an evaluation process to assess the effectiveness of school plans and programs interpret information and communicate progress toward achievement of school vision and goals for educators in the community and other stakeholders Building Leadership 2

Standard 2: School Learning Culture: An education leader at the building level applies knowledge that promotes the success of every student by advocating, nurturing, and sustaining a school culture and instructional program conducive to student learning and staff professional growth. Function 1: Culture building: Candidates understand and can sustain a school culture and instructional program conducive to student learning through collaboration, trust, and a personalized learning environment with high expectations for students. 2.1.1 2.1.2 theories on human development behavior, personalized learning environment, and motivation collaborate with others to accomplish school improvement goals incorporate cultural competence in school culture and ways it can be influenced to ensure student success development of programs, curriculum, and instructional practices methods for providing ongoing feedback on using data, assessments, and evaluation strategies to improve practice monitor school programs and activities to ensure personalized learning opportunities recognize, celebrate, and incorporate diversity in programs, curriculum, and instructional practices facilitate the use of appropriate content based learning materials and learning strategies promote trust, equity, fairness, and respect Function 2: Instructional Evaluation: Candidates understand and can create and evaluate a comprehensive, rigorous, and coherent curricular and instructional school program. 2.2.1 curriculum development and use of differentiated instructional delivery theories, materials, and other resources to address diverse learner populations measures of teacher performance high quality research and data-based multiple methods of evaluation, accountability systems, data collection, and analysis of evidence school technology and information systems to support and monitor student learning for all 2.2.2 collaborate with faculty to plan, implement, and evaluate a coordinated, aligned, and articulated curriculum use evidence-centered research in making curricular and instructional decisions interpret information and communicate progress toward achievement design a process for ensuring evaluation systems and school plans are based on multiple measures of teacher performance and student outcomes, and provide feedback based on evidence regular analysis and disaggregation of data about all students to improve Building Leadership 3

learning Function 3: Manage Capacity: Candidates understand and can develop and supervise the instructional and leadership capacity of school community. 2.3.1 2.3.2 high-quality professional development for school staff and leaders work collaboratively with school community to improve teaching and instructional leadership practices learning leadership theory, change processes, and evaluation ensure processes that emphasize the use of differentiated instructional standards for high-quality teacher, principal, and district practice strategies, curriculum materials, and technologies to maximize high-quality instruction design professional growth plans to increase the capacity of school staff and leaders that reflect national professional development standards Function 4: Promote Technology: Candidates understand and can promote the most effective and appropriate technologies to support teaching and learning in a school-level environment. 2.4.1 technology and its uses for instruction within the school infrastructures for the ongoing support, review, and planning of instructional technology 2.4.2 use technologies for improved classroom instruction, student achievement, and continuous school improvement monitor instructional practices within the school and provide assistance to teachers use technology and performance management systems to monitor, analyze, and evaluate school assessment data results for accountability reporting Building Leadership 4

Standard 3: Management: An education leader at the building level applies knowledge that promotes the success of every student by ensuring management of the organization, operation, and resources for a safe, efficient, and effective learning environment. Function 1: Evaluation: Candidates understand and can monitor and evaluate school management and operational systems. 3.1.1 school management of organizational, operational, and legal resources 3.1.2 analyze school processes and operations to identify and prioritize strategic and acquisition and maintenance of tactical challenges for the school equipment and materials to support teaching and learning develop school operational policies and procedures school management of marketing and public relations functions develop plans to implement and manage long-range plans for the school Function 2: Efficiency: Candidates understand and can efficiently use human, fiscal, and technological resources to manage school operations. 3.2.1 3.2.2 methods and procedures for acquiring and managing school resources, including the strategic management of human capital school operations, and school facilities develop multi-year fiscal plans and annual budgets aligned to the school s priorities and goals analyze a school s budget and financial status alignment of resources to building priorities and forecasting resource requirements for the school develop facility and space utilization plans for a school project long-term resource needs of a acquisition and maintenance of technology and appropriate management systems school use technology to manage school operational systems Function 3: Policy Management: Candidates understand and can promote school-based policies and procedures that protect the welfare and safety of students and staff. 3.3.1 school strategies supporting safe and secure learning environments including prevention, crisis management, and public relations school strategies supporting student development of self-management, civic literacy, and positive leadership skills school-based discipline management policies and plans 3.3.2 develop a comprehensive plan for providing school staff, students, and visitors with a safe and secure school building environment plan an aligned building discipline management policies and plan evaluate and implement discipline management plans Building Leadership 5

Function 4: Develop Capacity: Candidates understand and can develop school capacity for distributed leadership. 3.4.1 the meaning of distributed leadership in 3.4.2 identify leadership capabilities of staff a school environment and how to create and sustain it recruiting and retaining highly qualified personnel model distributed leadership skills and assign personnel to address diverse student needs and equity goals involve school staff in decision making processes Function 5: Prioritize: Candidates understand and can ensure that teacher and organizational time focuses on supporting high-quality school instruction and student learning. 3.5.1 supervision strategies that ensure that teachers maximize time spent on highquality instruction and student learning management theories on effective school time, priorities, and schedules 3.5.2 develop school policies that protect time and schedules to maximize teacher instructional time and student learning develop a school master schedule Building Leadership 6

Standard 4: Collaboration: An education leader at the building level applies knowledge that promotes the success of every student by collaborating with faculty and school, home and community members, responding to diverse stakeholder interests and needs, and mobilizing external resources. Function 1: Collaboration: Candidates understand and can collaborate with faculty and school, home and community members by collecting and analyzing information pertinent to the improvement of the school s educational environment. 4.1.1 collaboration and communication techniques to improve the school s educational environment information pertinent to the school s educational environment 4.1.2 use collaboration strategies to collect, analyze, and interpret school, student, faculty, and community information communicate information about the school within the community develop family and community partnerships Function 2: Resource Management: Candidates understand and can mobilize community resources by promoting an understanding, appreciation, and use of the diverse cultural, social, and intellectual resources within the school community. 4.2.1 identify and mobilize effective community resources 4.2.2 identify and use diverse stakeholder resources to improve school programs school-based cultural competence diverse cultural, social, and intellectual resources among district stakeholders Function 3: Relationship Building: Candidates understand and can respond to stakeholder interests and needs by building and sustaining positive school relationships with families and caregivers. 4.3.1 the needs of students, parents or caregivers school organizational culture that promotes open communication with families and caregivers school strategies for effective oral and written communication with families and caregivers approaches to collaboration with families and caregivers 4.3.2 conduct needs assessments of families and caregivers develop collaboration strategies for effective relationships with families and caregivers involve families and caregivers in the decision-making processes at the school Building Leadership 7

Function 4: Relationship Building: Candidates understand and can respond to stakeholder interests and needs by building and sustaining productive school relationships with community partners. 4.4.1 the needs of school community partners 4.4.2 conduct needs assessment of school organizational culture that community partners promotes open communication with community partners develop effective relationships with a variety of community partners school strategies for effective oral and written communication with community partners involve community partners in the decision-making processes at the school collaboration methods to develop and sustain productive relationships with community partners Building Leadership 8

Standard 5: Professional Ethics: An education leader at the building level applies knowledge that promotes the success of every student by acting with integrity, fairness, and in an ethical manner. Function 1: Ethical Behavior: Candidates understand and can act with integrity and fairness to ensure that schools are accountable for every student s academic and social success. 5.1.1 5.1.2 practices demonstrating principles of integrity and fairness act with integrity and fairness in supporting school policies and staff federal, state, and local legal and policy guidelines that creates operational practices that ensure every student s academic and social success definitions of accountability, equity, and social justice create an infrastructure that helps to monitor and ensure equitable practices Function 2: Model Ethical Behavior: Candidates understand and can model principles of selfawareness, reflective practice, transparency, and ethical behavior as related to their roles within the school. 5.2.1 the basic principles of ethical behavior established by legal and professional organizations the relationship between ethical behavior, school culture, and student achievement the effect of ethical behavior on one s own leadership 5.2.2 formulate a school-level leadership platform grounded in ethical standards and practices analyze leadership decisions in terms of established ethical practices Function 3: Professional Values: Candidates understand and can safeguard the values of democracy, equity, and diversity. 5.3.1 democratic values, equity, and diversity protection of rights and appropriate confidentiality of students and staff 5.3.2 develop, implement, and evaluate school policies and procedures that support democratic values, equity, and diversity issues develop appropriate communication skills to advocate for democracy, equity, and diversity Function 4: Evaluation: Candidates understand and can evaluate the potential moral and legal consequences of decision making in the school. 5.4.1 moral and legal consequences of decision making in schools strategies to prevent difficulties related to moral and legal issues 5.4.2 formulate sound school strategies to educational dilemmas evaluate school strategies to prevent difficulties related to moral and legal Building Leadership 9

issues Function 5: Professional Behavior: Candidates understand and can promote social justice within a school to ensure that individual student needs inform all aspects of schooling. 5.5.1 the relationship between social justice, school culture, and student achievement theories of efficacy 5.5.2 review and critique school procedures, programs, and practices to ensure that student needs inform all aspects of schooling, including social justice, equity, confidentiality, acceptance, and respect between and among students and faculty within the school develop the resiliency to uphold core values and persist in the face of adversity Building Leadership 10

Standard 6: Advocacy: An education leader at the building level applies knowledge that promotes the success of every student by understanding, responding to, and influencing the political, social, economic, legal, and cultural context. Function 1: Advocacy: Candidates understand and can advocate for school students, families, and caregivers, as well as empower families to self-advocate. 6.1.1 6.1.2 policies, laws, and regulations enacted by state, local, and federal authorities that affect schools analyze how law and policy is applied consistently, fairly and ethically within the school the effect that poverty, disadvantages, and resources have on families, caregivers, communities, students, and learning advocate based on an analysis of the complex causes of poverty and other disadvantages serve as a respectful spokesperson for students and families within the school Function 2: Decision Maker: Candidates understand and can act to influence local, district, state, and national decisions affecting student learning in a school environment. 6.2.1 the larger political, social, economic, legal, and cultural context ways that power and political skills can influence local, state, or federal decisions 6.2.2 advocate for school policies and programs that promote equitable learning opportunities and student success communicate policies, laws, regulations, and procedures to school community Function 3: Visionary: Candidates understand and can anticipate and assess emerging trends and initiatives in order to adapt school-based leadership strategies. 6.3.1 future issues and trends that can affect schools (e.g., entrepreneurial approaches) contemporary and emerging leadership strategies to address trends 6.3.2 identify and anticipate emerging trends and issues likely to affect the school adapt leadership strategies and practice to address emerging school issues Building Leadership 11