Criteria for Evaluating Debate Performance

Similar documents
NAME OF ASSESSMENT: Reading Informational Texts and Argument Writing Performance Assessment

Red Flags of Conflict

BEST OFFICIAL WORLD SCHOOLS DEBATE RULES

Writing for the AP U.S. History Exam

HISTORY COURSE WORK GUIDE 1. LECTURES, TUTORIALS AND ASSESSMENT 2. GRADES/MARKS SCHEDULE

Fears and Phobias Unit Plan

Politics and Society Curriculum Specification

Exploring Children s Strategies for Equal Sharing Fraction Problems

Creating the Student Platform Fall 2008

Critical Thinking in Everyday Life: 9 Strategies

Marketing Management MBA 706 Mondays 2:00-4:50

EVERYTHING DiSC WORKPLACE LEADER S GUIDE

Firms and Markets Saturdays Summer I 2014

Handouts and Resources

Custom Program Title. Leader s Guide. Understanding Other Styles. Discovering Your DiSC Style. Building More Effective Relationships

Software Security: Integrating Secure Software Engineering in Graduate Computer Science Curriculum

STEP 1: DESIRED RESULTS

International Business BADM 455, Section 2 Spring 2008

To the Student: ABOUT THE EXAM

E-3: Check for academic understanding

CS 100: Principles of Computing

Effectively Resolving Conflict in the Workplace

The Giver Reading Questions

This curriculum is brought to you by the National Officer Team.

THE IMPLEMENTATION OF BRITISH PARLIAMENTARY DEBATE SYSTEM IN LEARNING DISCUSSION TEXT

The Success Principles How to Get from Where You Are to Where You Want to Be

INTRODUCTION TO SOCIOLOGY SOCY 1001, Spring Semester 2013

My first english teacher essay. To teacher first on research andor english, simply order an essay from us..

Writing Research Articles

Effective Team Resource Management. Danielle Marciniak, M.S. ASDA Vice President

Rubric for Scoring English 1 Unit 1, Rhetorical Analysis

UEP 251: Economics for Planning and Policy Analysis Spring 2015

Tap vs. Bottled Water

Multicultural Education: Perspectives and Theory. Multicultural Education by Dr. Chiu, Mei-Wen

Mock Trial Preparation In-Class Assignment to Prepare Direct and Cross Examination Roles 25 September 2015 DIRECT EXAMINATION

Mastering Team Skills and Interpersonal Communication. Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

Helping Graduate Students Join an Online Learning Community

Learning Disabilities and Educational Research 1

What is Research? A Reconstruction from 15 Snapshots. Charlie Van Loan

The Foundations of Interpersonal Communication

PREP S SPEAKER LISTENER TECHNIQUE COACHING MANUAL

Critical Thinking in the Workplace. for City of Tallahassee Gabrielle K. Gabrielli, Ph.D.

Introduction 1 MBTI Basics 2 Decision-Making Applications 44 How to Get the Most out of This Booklet 6

writing good objectives lesson plans writing plan objective. lesson. writings good. plan plan good lesson writing writing. plan plan objective

Getting Started with Deliberate Practice

Title:A Flexible Simulation Platform to Quantify and Manage Emergency Department Crowding

T Seminar on Internetworking

1. Professional learning communities Prelude. 4.2 Introduction

TU-E2090 Research Assignment in Operations Management and Services

Lessons on American Presidents.com

CRITICAL THINKING AND WRITING: ENG 200H-D01 - Spring 2017 TR 10:45-12:15 p.m., HH 205

SPM 5309: SPORT MARKETING Fall 2017 (SEC. 8695; 3 credits)

LIT Novel Unit. Spring Semester 2008

What can I learn from worms?

JAMALIN R. HARP. Adjunct, Texas Christian University, Department of History January 2016 May 2016 HIST 10603: United States Before 1877

Course Description: Technology:

EDIT 576 (2 credits) Mobile Learning and Applications Fall Semester 2015 August 31 October 18, 2015 Fully Online Course

A non-profit educational institution dedicated to making the world a better place to live

520 HISTORY.ORG CIVICS HOW DO PEOPLE WORK TOGETHER TO SOLVE PROBLEMS?

The Political Engagement Activity Student Guide

Guide to the Uniform mark scale (UMS) Uniform marks in A-level and GCSE exams

Academic Controversy: Increase Intellectual Conflict And Increase The. Quality Of Learning 1. David W. Johnson and Roger T.

Common Core Exemplar for English Language Arts and Social Studies: GRADE 1

FAQ: The 4Rs and Social & Emotional Learning

ERDINGTON ACADEMY PROSPECTUS 2016/17

Rover Races Grades: 3-5 Prep Time: ~45 Minutes Lesson Time: ~105 minutes

Changing User Attitudes to Reduce Spreadsheet Risk

Predatory Reading, & Some Related Hints on Writing. I. Suggestions for Reading

Statistical Analysis of Climate Change, Renewable Energies, and Sustainability An Independent Investigation for Introduction to Statistics

Foothill College Summer 2016

Alabama

EDUC-E328 Science in the Elementary Schools

Thank you letters to teachers >>>CLICK HERE<<<

Learning Resource Center COLLECTION DEVELOPMENT POLICY

The Future Of NATO [Kindle Edition] By James M. Goldgeier

CLASS EXPECTATIONS Respect yourself, the teacher & others 2. Put forth your best effort at all times Be prepared for class each day

UNITED STATES SOCIAL HISTORY: CULTURAL PLURALISM IN AMERICA El Camino College - History 32 Spring 2009 Dr. Christina Gold

HISTORY 108: United States History: The American Indian Experience Course Syllabus, Spring 2016 Section 2384

LAMS Letters. FROM the CHAIR: By Laurence Gavin. A Newsletter of NCLA s Library Administration & Management (LAMS) Section

EDIT 576 DL1 (2 credits) Mobile Learning and Applications Fall Semester 2014 August 25 October 12, 2014 Fully Online Course

Facilitating Difficult Dialogues in the Classroom. We find comfort among those who agree with us, growth among those who don t. Frank A.

Chapter 9: Conducting Interviews

HIS/IAR 627: Museum and Historic Site Interpretation

Writing an Effective Research Proposal

Planning a Dissertation/ Project

THE UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN ONTARIO. Department of Psychology

Grade 4. Common Core Adoption Process. (Unpacked Standards)

TOPICS IN PUBLIC FINANCE

Starter Packet. Always Move Forward. Preparing a Student for College. A Parent s Timeline for Success

Manual for teacher trainers

What s in Your Communication Toolbox? COMMUNICATION TOOLBOX. verse clinical scenarios to bolster clinical outcomes: 1

The Politics of Human Rights

Why Pay Attention to Race?

Faculty Meetings. From Dissemination. To Engagement. Jessica Lyons MaryBeth Scullion Rachel Wagner City of Tonawanda School District, NY

Oak Park and River Forest High School District 200 Board of Education May 22, 2014 Personnel Report

MENTORING. Tips, Techniques, and Best Practices

Selling Skills. Tailored to Your Needs. Consultants & trainers in sales, presentations, negotiations and influence

The Speaker and the Audience: The Occasion and the Subject

Administrative Services Manager Information Guide

RESOLVING CONFLICT. The Leadership Excellence Series WHERE LEADERS ARE MADE

Transcription:

Name Course AHAP History HGHS Criteria for Evaluating Debate Performance Content All of the information that you present should be accurate. You and your team should demonstrate a comprehensive understanding of all aspects of the issue and should discuss all of the points that best support your case. You should not be expected to bring up points that do damage to your case - that is the job of the opposition. Preparation Each member of the team is responsible for giving a well-constructed opening statement of a minute to a minute and a half in length. During the course of the debate you should have facts at your fingertips and counter-arguments ready to go depending on the performance of the opposition. You are permitted to bring into the debate: note cards, outlines, books and any other helpful resource. You should also be prepared to make a closing statement of approximately one minute that emphasizes your most important points. Argumentation The arguments you make during the debate should be logical and demonstrate a clear analysis of the issue. Appropriate emphasis should be given to your strongest arguments, but you shouldn t harp on only a single point for too long. Finally, you should demonstrate that you have heard and understand your opponents arguments by meeting them head on and giving your best counter-arguments. Presentation You should speak confidently and with conviction. In order to do this, you must make eye contact with the class and speak clearly. Structure for the Debate I. Opening Statements - Each team will be responsible for an opening statement which should take about two minutes per team member and no more to deliver (1-1½ typed pages, double-spaced). The purpose of these statements is to lay out the outline of your case in a persuasive manner; you should introduce each of your strongest arguments. **A copy of each opening statement also must be given to the other side two school days before the day of the debate. (If primary source documents will be used/quoted in your presentation, a copy of each of those must be given to the opposing side as well two days before!)** Make sure that each team member covers some other aspect of the team s debate position [** there should NOT be a lot of repetitive points made by several team members coordinate your presentations!! **] II. Hot Seat Round - After each opening statement, each side will have the opportunity to put the person who just delivered the opening statement in the hot seat, by asking a series of questions. First the con side will ask question after question to the person who delivered the pro side s first opening statement for a period of up to two minutes. After the con side has delivered their first opening

statement, the roles will be reversed and so on until everyone in the debate has delivered their opening statement and then been cross examined. The side asking questions should not use this time to make statements or argue; the person responding should answer the questions as directly as possible. The purpose of the questions should be to perhaps expose a weakness in the opponent s argument, or force the other side to commit to a position that you will attack later. After this round you should know exactly what your opponent is saying. In any case, if you are the questioner, this is not the time to drag out an argument or refute everything the opposition says - that will come in the next round. III. Rebuttal Round - Each team will be responsible for a three minute rebuttal. This is the time to: first, defend against any attacks made on your team s position and second, go on the offensive yourself. Don t hold anything back during this round - take advantage of all the weaknesses you have discovered in your opponent s argument during the previous rounds. DON T just rehash the points you made in your opening statements! IV. Prep Time - Before the turn of someone on your team to speak, your team may take a time out to consult and plan what to say. Each team will have a cumulative total of three minutes of this prep time. V. Closing Statements Each team member on the PRO side will begin with a one minute closing statement [this should be based on what the CON side presented in their arguments and rebuttal]. After the PRO side has completed their closing statements, then the CON side will proceed. VI. Questions from the class and the free for all round - At this point in the debate the class will be given the opportunity to ask questions of whichever side they choose. A maximum of ten minutes will be provided. Often times this part of the debate can be chaotic. I will be attempting to moderate the proceedings. Grading Policy for AHAP Debates Your grade will be based on the following items: 1. The Debate itself - according to the criteria for evaluating debate performance. 30% of the final grade. 2. The Opening Statement - according to the criteria laid out above and to be collected the day of the debate. 15% of the final grade. 3. Questions for the opposition - On the day of the debate I will collect three to five questions that you plan to ask the other side during the hot seat round. These questions will be evaluated based on how well designed they seem to gain useful information or penetrate to the weakness of the other side s argument. 5% of the final grade. 4. Four to five page paper - The paper should have three parts: a) an explanation of the arguments on one side of the issue b) an explanation of the arguments on the other side of the issue c) your opinion - which can be different from the side you were forced to take during the debate. This paper should contain a bibliography of at least five sources and end notes should be used as citations used whenever appropriate. The paper is due exactly one cycle after the debate takes place and is worth 50% of the final grade for the debate.

Hand in your packet in this order: 1. Your paper. 2. Bibliography page [with at least FIVE sources] 3. Opening Statement 4. Closing Statement 5. Questions Cross-Examination Questions Source: Breaking Down Barriers 1. Ask Questions to Clarify Arguments What was your second point? How many people are you saying died during this period? In your opinion who was most at fault for the war starting? How are you saying these policies helped the economy? 2. Ask Questions about the Quality of your Opponent s Evidence What was your source for that evidence? When was that book written? Was that the historian s opinion, or is s/he claiming this as fact? 3. Ask Questions to get your Opponent to Admit their Case has Weaknesses Are you aware of any plans at the time to fix this problem other than the plan that was attempted? Do you admit that on this occasion many people died? Do you admit that this leader/country did anything to start the war? 4. Ask Questions to Set Up Arguments (For instance, if your opponent is arguing that Cromwell was bad for England because he was intolerant of certain religious groups, you might proceed in the following manner). So, are you arguing that religious intolerance is a bad thing? Does it then follow that if one government is more tolerant than another, that it is a better government from the perspective of religious tolerance? (After getting your opponent to admit this, wait until the rebuttal round to point out that Cromwell s government was more tolerant than all of his opponents had been, or were planning to be). 5. Maintain Control of the Cross-Examination Allowing your opponent to answer your questions doesn t mean your opponent is entitled to give a full speech each time s/he answers. Just give him/her the needed time to answer. Likewise, don t make arguments yourself during your time to ask questions - you are simply wasting the time you could be using to ask more questions, letting your opponent off the hot seat and inviting them to answer your arguments in kind and score points.

Overview of How the Debates Will Be Conducted: 1. OPENING STATEMENTS 2 minutes for each person [one member from each side will alternate] 2. HOT SEAT 2 minutes for each person [you will be rapidly questioned by the members of the opposition team. 3. REBUTTAL 3 minutes PER SIDE each side presents holes in the other side and closes holes they made in the first round. 4. CLOSING STATEMENTS 1 minute per person the entire team will close before the other team does the same. 5. CLASS QUESTIONING 7 to 10 minutes [time permitting] class members should NOT pontificate, but should have a question in mind before they raise their hand. They should point to a debater and direct the short, to-the-point question to that debater, or they could throw out the question to an entire side. PREP TIME Each team will have a TOTAL of 3 minutes that they can use at any time [they don t have to use all 3 minutes at once].

Debate Topics 1. Resolved, that as President, Thomas Jefferson was faithful to his Democratic-Republican values. 2. Resolved, Reconstruction was a splendid failure. 3. Resolved, Progressivism failed because it brought about reforms that were superficial at best, and failed to seriously address issues of inequality in American society. 4. Resolved, that the New Deal was an economic failure. 5. Resolved, that Richard Nixon was a liberal Republican President. Course 2 PRO CON 1 Jesse H., Sara McE. Jordan S., James S. 2 Lily L., William G. Aparna N., Peri G. 3 Jiayi P., Benjamin G. Juliana P., Samantha M. 4 Lawayna S., Tulsi P. Sasha Z., Stefanie B. 5 Richard G., Brian S. Max F., Eileen H. Course 3 PRO CON 1 Darren C., Haley G. Bryan H., Alexandra M. 2 Ilana S., Max B., Anthony S. Arielle K., Brian B., Jacob S. 3 Willa G., Benjamin D., Sanan V. Angela L., Conor D., Ben J. 4 Jack P., Aleksa K., Caroline Q. Eliza R., Zoe L., James N. 5 Jonathan S., Harris M. Jessica T., Caroline W. Course 5 PRO CON 1 Allison C., Jordan G. Walker R., Erica G. 2 Emily B., Emma A. Rebecca N., Jonathan Ren. 3 Kayla H., Alexandra G. Amy W., Danielle B. 4 Matthew X., Rebecca F. Jackson G., Jessica C. 5 Jonathan R., Joshua P. Zachary S., Ryan L. Course 8 PRO CON 1 Sarah J., Nicole Lee F. Kathleen C., Brett G. 2 Nicholas B., Joshua K. Ethan F., Andrew M. 3 Maura G., Emma L., Nir T. Jacqueline I., Joel R., Joanna T. 4 Sabrina P., Miranda L., Marisa W. Joanna T., Claire S., Aaron L. 5 Rebecca S., Gabrielle M., Jonathan L. Emily L., Madeleine S.