Gary School Community Corporation Mathematics Department Unit Document. Unit Number: 4 Grade: 6

Similar documents
Extending Place Value with Whole Numbers to 1,000,000

Algebra 1, Quarter 3, Unit 3.1. Line of Best Fit. Overview

AGS THE GREAT REVIEW GAME FOR PRE-ALGEBRA (CD) CORRELATED TO CALIFORNIA CONTENT STANDARDS

Statewide Framework Document for:

Montana Content Standards for Mathematics Grade 3. Montana Content Standards for Mathematical Practices and Mathematics Content Adopted November 2011

Grade 6: Correlated to AGS Basic Math Skills

Focus of the Unit: Much of this unit focuses on extending previous skills of multiplication and division to multi-digit whole numbers.

First Grade Standards

Florida Mathematics Standards for Geometry Honors (CPalms # )

Cal s Dinner Card Deals

Characteristics of Functions

CAAP. Content Analysis Report. Sample College. Institution Code: 9011 Institution Type: 4-Year Subgroup: none Test Date: Spring 2011

Arizona s College and Career Ready Standards Mathematics

Mathematics subject curriculum

Problem of the Month: Movin n Groovin

Honors Mathematics. Introduction and Definition of Honors Mathematics

Playing It By Ear The First Year of SCHEMaTC: South Carolina High Energy Mathematics Teachers Circle

Page 1 of 11. Curriculum Map: Grade 4 Math Course: Math 4 Sub-topic: General. Grade(s): None specified

Classroom Connections Examining the Intersection of the Standards for Mathematical Content and the Standards for Mathematical Practice

Dublin City Schools Mathematics Graded Course of Study GRADE 4

Math-U-See Correlation with the Common Core State Standards for Mathematical Content for Third Grade

Math 96: Intermediate Algebra in Context

Learning Disability Functional Capacity Evaluation. Dear Doctor,

Math 098 Intermediate Algebra Spring 2018

INTERMEDIATE ALGEBRA PRODUCT GUIDE

AP Calculus AB. Nevada Academic Standards that are assessable at the local level only.

LLD MATH. Student Eligibility: Grades 6-8. Credit Value: Date Approved: 8/24/15

Rendezvous with Comet Halley Next Generation of Science Standards


Mathematics. Mathematics

Unit 3 Ratios and Rates Math 6

Exemplar 6 th Grade Math Unit: Prime Factorization, Greatest Common Factor, and Least Common Multiple

Missouri Mathematics Grade-Level Expectations

BENCHMARK MA.8.A.6.1. Reporting Category

Technical Manual Supplement

OFFICE SUPPORT SPECIALIST Technical Diploma

GUIDE TO THE CUNY ASSESSMENT TESTS

Physics 270: Experimental Physics

UNIT ONE Tools of Algebra

Alignment of Australian Curriculum Year Levels to the Scope and Sequence of Math-U-See Program

This Performance Standards include four major components. They are

Common Core State Standards

South Carolina College- and Career-Ready Standards for Mathematics. Standards Unpacking Documents Grade 5

Are You Ready? Simplify Fractions

Mathematics Assessment Plan

Common Core Standards Alignment Chart Grade 5

This scope and sequence assumes 160 days for instruction, divided among 15 units.

Syllabus ENGR 190 Introductory Calculus (QR)

Content Language Objectives (CLOs) August 2012, H. Butts & G. De Anda

Grade 5 + DIGITAL. EL Strategies. DOK 1-4 RTI Tiers 1-3. Flexible Supplemental K-8 ELA & Math Online & Print

Georgia Department of Education Georgia Standards of Excellence Framework GSE Sophisticated Shapes Unit 1

Language Acquisition Chart

Standard 1: Number and Computation

SAT MATH PREP:

Ohio s Learning Standards-Clear Learning Targets

1.11 I Know What Do You Know?

Instructional Supports for Common Core and Beyond: FORMATIVE ASSESMENT

What's My Value? Using "Manipulatives" and Writing to Explain Place Value. by Amanda Donovan, 2016 CTI Fellow David Cox Road Elementary School

EQuIP Review Feedback

Math 121 Fundamentals of Mathematics I

TOPICS LEARNING OUTCOMES ACTIVITES ASSESSMENT Numbers and the number system

Math Grade 3 Assessment Anchors and Eligible Content

NCSC Alternate Assessments and Instructional Materials Based on Common Core State Standards

Foothill College Summer 2016

TABE 9&10. Revised 8/2013- with reference to College and Career Readiness Standards

Intermediate Algebra

PROGRESS MONITORING FOR STUDENTS WITH DISABILITIES Participant Materials

Introducing the New Iowa Assessments Mathematics Levels 12 14

5. UPPER INTERMEDIATE

QUICK START GUIDE. your kit BOXES 1 & 2 BRIDGES. Teachers Guides

Strategies for Solving Fraction Tasks and Their Link to Algebraic Thinking

Fourth Grade. Reporting Student Progress. Libertyville School District 70. Fourth Grade

Integrating Common Core Standards and CASAS Content Standards: Improving Instruction and Adult Learner Outcomes

Radius STEM Readiness TM

Task Types. Duration, Work and Units Prepared by

Written by Wendy Osterman

Bittinger, M. L., Ellenbogen, D. J., & Johnson, B. L. (2012). Prealgebra (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Mathematics Program Assessment Plan

Sample worksheet from

South Carolina English Language Arts

CUNY ASSESSMENT TESTS Webinar for International Students

Grade 2: Using a Number Line to Order and Compare Numbers Place Value Horizontal Content Strand

DMA CLUSTER CALCULATIONS POLICY

Update on Standards and Educator Evaluation

Stacks Teacher notes. Activity description. Suitability. Time. AMP resources. Equipment. Key mathematical language. Key processes

Helping Your Children Learn in the Middle School Years MATH

THE PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY SCHREYER HONORS COLLEGE DEPARTMENT OF MATHEMATICS ASSESSING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF MULTIPLE CHOICE MATH TESTS

KLI: Infer KCs from repeated assessment events. Do you know what you know? Ken Koedinger HCI & Psychology CMU Director of LearnLab

Algebra 1 Summer Packet

School of Innovative Technologies and Engineering

STA 225: Introductory Statistics (CT)

Let s think about how to multiply and divide fractions by fractions!

FIGURE IT OUT! MIDDLE SCHOOL TASKS. Texas Performance Standards Project

Livermore Valley Joint Unified School District. B or better in Algebra I, or consent of instructor

Grade 11 Language Arts (2 Semester Course) CURRICULUM. Course Description ENGLISH 11 (2 Semester Course) Duration: 2 Semesters Prerequisite: None

Course Syllabus for Math

Remainder Rules. 3. Ask students: How many carnations can you order and what size bunches do you make to take five carnations home?

The Algebra in the Arithmetic Finding analogous tasks and structures in arithmetic that can be used throughout algebra

1 3-5 = Subtraction - a binary operation

MAT 122 Intermediate Algebra Syllabus Summer 2016

Transcription:

Gary School Community Corporation Mathematics Department Unit Document Unit Number: 4 Grade: 6 Unit Name: Algebraic Reasoning Expressions Duration of Unit: 15-20 days UNIT FOCUS In this unit, students explore operations in terms of verbal expressions and determine that arithmetic properties hold true with expressions because nothing has changed they are still doing arithmetic with numbers. They determine that letters are used to represent specific but unknown numbers and are used to make statements or identities that are true for all numbers or a range of numbers. Students will use relationships of operations to generate equivalent expressions, ultimately extending arithmetic properties from manipulating numbers to manipulating expressions. Students read, write and evaluate expressions in order to develop and evaluate formulas. Standards for Mathematical Content 6.C.6: Apply the order of operations and properties of operations (identity, inverse, commutative properties of addition and multiplication, associative properties of addition and multiplication, and distributive property) to evaluate numerical expressions with nonnegative rational numbers, including those using grouping symbols, such as parentheses, and involving whole number exponents. Justify each step in the process. 6.AF.1: Evaluate expressions for specific values of their variables, including expressions with whole-number exponents and those that arise from formulas used in real-world problems. 6.AF.2: Apply the properties of operations (e.g., identity, inverse, commutative, associative, distributive properties) to create equivalent linear expressions and to justify whether two linear expressions are equivalent when the two expressions name the same number regardless of which value is substituted into them. Standard Emphasis Critical Important Additional ****** ****** ****** 6.C.5: Evaluate positive rational numbers with whole number exponents. ****** 6.AF.3: Define and use multiple variables when writing expressions to represent real-world and other mathematical problems, and evaluate them for given values. ****** Mathematical Process Standards: PS.1: Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them. PS.2: Reason abstractly and quantitatively PS.3: Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others PS.4: Model with mathematics PS.6: Attend to Precision PS.7: Look for and make use of structure PS.8: Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning ******** Vertical Articulation documents for K 2, 3 5, and 6 8 can be found at: http://www.doe.in.gov/standards/mathematics (scroll to bottom)

Big Ideas/Goals Essential Questions/ Learning Targets I Can Statements Arithmetic properties hold true for verbal expressions in the same way as for mathematical expressions. What is a verbal expression that shows the same relationship as the commutative property of addition? I can apply the order of operations and properties of operations to evaluate numerical expressions. Whole number exponents represent powers of ten. How is 3X different than X 3? I can evaluate positive rational numbers with while number exponents. In an expression, letters stand for and represent numbers. Mathematical identities can be used to evaluate expressions. Can more than one number in a set be used to evaluate an expression? How can the distributive property be used to evaluate an expression? I can evaluate expressions for specific values of their variables. I can apply the properties of operations to create equivalent linear expressions. An equation with one or more variable is an open sentence, and if the variable is replaced with a number, the new sentence is no longer open. How can you justify the equivalence of two linear expressions? I can justify whether two linear expressions are equivalent. Variables can be used to write expressions and those expressions can be evaluated given the value of the variable. How can an expression with multiple variables be evaluated? I can define and use multiple variables when writing and evaluating expressions to represent mathematical problems. UNIT ASSESSMENT TIME LINE Beginning of Unit Pre-Assessment 2

Assessment Name: Simple Expressions Assessment Type: Pre-Assessment Assessment Standards: 6.C.6, 6.AF.2 Assessment Description: Students use 10 square tiles to create and record expressions. They will create expressions by adding and subtracting tiles and discovering and predicting patterns for the identity properties. Throughout the Unit Formative Assessment Assessment Name: Understanding Identities Assessment Type: Exit Ticket Assessing Standards: 6.C.6, 6.AF.2 Assessment Description: A brief check for understanding about identities. A possible example and answer is shown below: Assessment Name: Using Variables to Create Expressions Assessment Type: Performance Task Assessing Standards: 6.C.6, 6.AF.2 Assessment Description: Provide students with rectangular strips to represent different variables different ones for x and for y and use square tiles for units. Ask them to represent various expressions using the manipulatives and recording their created expressions. For example: represent x plus y, represent x plus 2, represent 10 minus 3, etc. Assessment Name: Evaluating Expressions using order of operations Assessment Type: Performance Task Assessing Standards: 6.C.6, 6.AF.2 Assessment Description: Provide students with square tiles for units. Ask them to represent various expressions using the tiles and record their created expressions. For example: Represent 3 + 4 X 2 (shown below) 3

Assessment Name: Using and Understanding Exponents Assessment Type: Exit Slip Assessing Standards: 6.C.5 Assessment Description: Students will complete a chart to record and evaluate expressions with exponents. One example with solutions is shown below: Assessment Name: Evaluating Equivalent Expressions Assessment Type: Check for Understanding Assessing Standards: 6.C.6, 6.AF.1, 6.AF.2, 6.AF.3 Assessment Description: Evaluate an expression with several operations using order of operations and show the steps. Example shown below with anticipated solutions: 4

End of Unit Summative Assessments Assessment Name: Working with and Evaluating Expressions Assessment Type: Summative short answer and word problems Assessing Standards: 6.C.6, 6.AF.1, 6.AF.2, 6.C.5, 6.AF.3 Assessment Description: Create a mixture of short answer questions, open response and word problems requiring the student to use the order of operations, and the properties of numbers. Also have examples of evaluating expressions with exponents and variables given values for the variables. PLAN FOR INSTRUCTION Unit Vocabulary Key terms are those that are newly introduced and explicitly taught with expectation of student mastery by end of unit. Prerequisite terms are those with which students have previous 5

experience and are foundational terms to use for differentiation. Key Terms for Unit Expression Algebraic expression Coefficient Constant Term Equation Simplify Like Terms Distributive Property of Multiplication over Addition Distributive Property of Multiplication over Subtraction Equivalent Expressions Exponent Exponential Notation Linear Expression Simple expression Prerequisite Math Terms Commutative Property of Addition Commutative Property of Multiplication Associative Property of Addition Associative Property of Multiplication Model Number Sentence Unit Resources/Notes Include district and supplemental resources for use in weekly planning Carnegie Learning, Course 1, Chapter 7 Introduction to Expressions Carnegie Learning Course 1, Chapter 8 Algebraic Expressions Targeted Process Standards for this Unit PS.1: Make sense of problems and persevere in solving them Mathematically proficient students start by explaining to themselves the meaning of a problem and looking for entry points to its solution. They analyze givens, constraints, relationships, and goals. They make conjectures about the form and meaning of the solution and plan a solution pathway, rather than simply jumping into a solution attempt. They consider analogous problems and try special cases and simpler forms of the original problem in order to gain insight into its solution. They monitor and evaluate their progress and change course if necessary. Mathematically proficient students check their answers to problems using a different method, and they continually ask themselves, Does this make sense? and "Is my answer reasonable?" They understand the approaches of others to solving complex problems and identify correspondences between different approaches. Mathematically proficient students understand how mathematical ideas interconnect and build on one another to produce a coherent whole. 6

PS.2: Reason abstractly and quantitatively. Mathematically proficient students make sense of quantities and their relationships in problem situations. They bring two complementary abilities to bear on problems involving quantitative relationships: the ability to decontextualize to abstract a given situation and represent it symbolically and manipulate the representing symbols as if they have a life of their own, without necessarily attending to their referents and the ability to contextualize, to pause as needed during the manipulation process in order to probe into the referents for the symbols involved. Quantitative reasoning entails habits of creating a coherent representation of the problem at hand; considering the units involved; attending to the meaning of quantities, not just how to compute them; and knowing and flexibly using different properties of operations and objects. PS.3: Construct viable arguments and critique the reasoning of others Mathematically proficient students understand and use stated assumptions, definitions, and previously established results in constructing arguments. They make conjectures and build a logical progression of statements to explore the truth of their conjectures. They analyze situations by breaking them into cases and recognize and use counterexamples. They organize their mathematical thinking, justify their conclusions and communicate them to others, and respond to the arguments of others. They reason inductively about data, making plausible arguments that take into account the context from which the data arose. Mathematically proficient students are also able to compare the effectiveness of two plausible arguments, distinguish correct logic or reasoning from that which is flawed, and if there is a flaw in an argument explain what it is. They justify whether a given statement is true always, sometimes, or never. Mathematically proficient students participate and collaborate in a mathematics community. They listen to or read the arguments of others, decide whether they make sense, and ask useful questions to clarify or improve the arguments. PS.4: Model with mathematics Mathematically proficient students apply the mathematics they know to solve problems arising in everyday life, society, and the workplace using a variety of appropriate strategies. They create and use a variety of representations to solve problems and to organize and communicate mathematical ideas. Mathematically proficient students apply what they know and are comfortable making assumptions and approximations to simplify a complicated situation, realizing that these may need revision later. They are able to identify important quantities in a practical situation and map their relationships using such tools as diagrams, two-way tables, graphs, flowcharts and formulas. They analyze those relationships mathematically to draw conclusions. They routinely interpret their mathematical results in the context of the situation and reflect on whether the results make sense, possibly improving the model if it has not served its purpose. PS.6: Attend to precision Mathematically proficient students communicate precisely to others. They use clear definitions, including correct mathematical language, in discussion with others and in their own reasoning. They state the meaning of the symbols they choose, including using the equal sign consistently and appropriately. They express solutions clearly and logically by using the appropriate mathematical terms and notation. They specify units of measure and label axes to clarify the correspondence with quantities in a problem. They calculate accurately and efficiently and check the validity of their results in the context of the problem. They express numerical answers with a degree of precision appropriate for the problem context. 7

PS.7: Look for and make use of structure Mathematically proficient students look closely to discern a pattern or structure. They step back for an overview and shift perspective. They recognize and use properties of operations and equality. They organize and classify geometric shapes based on their attributes. They see expressions, equations, and geometric figures as single objects or as being composed of several objects. PS.8: Look for and express regularity in repeated reasoning Mathematically proficient students notice if calculations are repeated and look for general methods and shortcuts. They notice regularity in mathematical problems and their work to create a rule or formula. Mathematically proficient students maintain oversight of the process, while attending to the details as they solve a problem. They continually evaluate the reasonableness of their intermediate results. 8