Annual TSI High School Summary Report. Student Performance on Texas Success Initiative (TSI) Readiness Measures

Similar documents
File Print Created 11/17/2017 6:16 PM 1 of 10

Frank Phillips College. Accountability Report

Data Diskette & CD ROM

TSI Operational Plan for Serving Lower Skilled Learners

TESTING. Who Must Take the TSI Assessment Exam? Who Does Not Have to Take the TSI Assessment Exam? When Must a Student Take the TSI Assessment Exam?

Moving the Needle: Creating Better Career Opportunities and Workforce Readiness. Austin ISD Progress Report

EDUCATIONAL ATTAINMENT

Evaluation of Teach For America:

ADMISSION TO THE UNIVERSITY

A Guide to Adequate Yearly Progress Analyses in Nevada 2007 Nevada Department of Education

Educational Attainment

5 Programmatic. The second component area of the equity audit is programmatic. Equity

An Introduction to School Finance in Texas

Best Colleges Main Survey

Miami-Dade County Public Schools

Enrollment Trends. Past, Present, and. Future. Presentation Topics. NCCC enrollment down from peak levels

READY OR NOT? CALIFORNIA'S EARLY ASSESSMENT PROGRAM AND THE TRANSITION TO COLLEGE

Port Graham El/High. Report Card for

Raw Data Files Instructions

Shelters Elementary School

DATE ISSUED: 11/2/ of 12 UPDATE 103 EHBE(LEGAL)-P

AGENDA ITEM VI-E October 2005 Page 1 CHAPTER 13. FINANCIAL PLANNING

National Collegiate Retention and Persistence to Degree Rates

University of Utah. 1. Graduation-Rates Data a. All Students. b. Student-Athletes

African American Success Initiative

Kansas Adequate Yearly Progress (AYP) Revised Guidance

2012 New England Regional Forum Boston, Massachusetts Wednesday, February 1, More Than a Test: The SAT and SAT Subject Tests

Race, Class, and the Selective College Experience

SAT Results December, 2002 Authors: Chuck Dulaney and Roger Regan WCPSS SAT Scores Reach Historic High

Multiple Measures Assessment Project - FAQs

Cooper Upper Elementary School

PEIMS Submission 1 list

Student Mobility Rates in Massachusetts Public Schools

Undergraduate Admissions Standards for the Massachusetts State University System and the University of Massachusetts. Reference Guide April 2016

Meeting the Challenges of No Child Left Behind in U.S. Immersion Education

State of New Jersey

John F. Kennedy Middle School

Strategic Plan Dashboard Results. Office of Institutional Research and Assessment

10/6/2017 UNDERGRADUATE SUCCESS SCHOLARS PROGRAM. Founded in 1969 as a graduate institution.

Coming in. Coming in. Coming in

Massachusetts Department of Elementary and Secondary Education. Title I Comparability

African American Male Achievement Update

FRANK PHILLIPS COLLEGE

Graduate Division Annual Report Key Findings

Katy Independent School District Davidson Elementary Campus Improvement Plan

Senior Parent Meeting What s next?

DELIVERING A DEMAND LED SYSTEM IN THE U.S. THE ALAMO COMMUNITY COLLEGES APPROACH

REGISTRATION. Enrollment Requirements. Academic Advisement for Registration. Registration. Sam Houston State University 1

National Collegiate Retention and. Persistence-to-Degree Rates

Student Support Services Evaluation Readiness Report. By Mandalyn R. Swanson, Ph.D., Program Evaluation Specialist. and Evaluation

NORTH CAROLINA VIRTUAL PUBLIC SCHOOL IN WCPSS UPDATE FOR FALL 2007, SPRING 2008, AND SUMMER 2008

2005 National Survey of Student Engagement: Freshman and Senior Students at. St. Cloud State University. Preliminary Report.

Psychometric Research Brief Office of Shared Accountability

Basic Skills Plus. Legislation and Guidelines. Hope Opportunity Jobs

Texas Bioscience Institute Educating Scientists For The Future. Nelda Howton

Iowa School District Profiles. Le Mars

The Demographic Wave: Rethinking Hispanic AP Trends

Practices Worthy of Attention Step Up to High School Chicago Public Schools Chicago, Illinois

Testing Schedule. Explained

Section V Reclassification of English Learners to Fluent English Proficient

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

ILLINOIS DISTRICT REPORT CARD

Status of Women of Color in Science, Engineering, and Medicine

Apply Texas. Tracking Student Progress

PROGRAM REVIEW REPORT. Radiation Therapy Technology

Los Angeles City College Student Equity Plan. Signature Page

Katy Independent School District Paetow High School Campus Improvement Plan

An Empirical Analysis of the Effects of Mexican American Studies Participation on Student Achievement within Tucson Unified School District

National Survey of Student Engagement Spring University of Kansas. Executive Summary

SAN JACINTO COLLEGE JOB DESCRIPTION

CATALOG. Additional general information available at.

UK Institutional Research Brief: Results of the 2012 National Survey of Student Engagement: A Comparison with Carnegie Peer Institutions

Basic Skills Initiative Project Proposal Date Submitted: March 14, Budget Control Number: (if project is continuing)

COURSE CATALOG & EDUCATIONAL PLANNING GUIDE SAN ANGELO INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT LAKE VIEW HIGH SCHOOL CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL

Appendix K: Survey Instrument

State Parental Involvement Plan

Bethune-Cookman University

Sunnyvale Middle School School Accountability Report Card Reported Using Data from the School Year Published During

Association Between Categorical Variables

Evaluation of a College Freshman Diversity Research Program

Harmony School of Advancement Harmony Public Schools Course Selection Guide

New Jersey Institute of Technology Newark College of Engineering

46 Children s Defense Fund

Longitudinal Analysis of the Effectiveness of DCPS Teachers

NBER WORKING PAPER SERIES WOULD THE ELIMINATION OF AFFIRMATIVE ACTION AFFECT HIGHLY QUALIFIED MINORITY APPLICANTS? EVIDENCE FROM CALIFORNIA AND TEXAS

Greetings, Ed Morris Executive Director Division of Adult and Career Education Los Angeles Unified School District

Descriptive Summary of Beginning Postsecondary Students Two Years After Entry

DUAL ENROLLMENT ADMISSIONS APPLICATION. You can get anywhere from here.

TEXAS HIGHER EDUCATION COORDINATING BOARD

Bellevue University Admission Application

Fostering Equity and Student Success in Higher Education

Every Student Succeeds Act: Building on Success in Tennessee. ESSA State Plan. Tennessee Department of Education December 19, 2016 Draft

2012 ACT RESULTS BACKGROUND

NCEO Technical Report 27

Office of Institutional Effectiveness 2012 NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT (NSSE) DIVERSITY ANALYSIS BY CLASS LEVEL AND GENDER VISION

Governor s Office of Budget, Planning and Policy and the Legislative Budget Board. Texas A&M University - Corpus Christi

U VA THE CHANGING FACE OF UVA STUDENTS: SSESSMENT. About The Study

A Diverse Student Body

Apps4VA at JMU. Student Projects Featuring VLDS Data. Dr. Chris Mayfield. Department of Computer Science James Madison University

Conroe Independent School District

Transcription:

Annual TSI High School Summary Report Student Performance on Texas Success Initiative (TSI) Readiness Measures 2015-2016 High School Graduates Enrolled in Texas Public Higher Education in Fall 2016 Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Austin, TX September 2017

Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board Annual Texas Success Initiative (TSI) Report of Student Readiness Status 2015-2016 High School Graduates Enrolled in Texas Public Higher Education in Fall 2016 Statewide Summary Report Link to 2015-2016 Individual School District Report Link to Statewide Summary Data As mandated by state statute, the Texas Success Initiative (TSI) includes standards for minimum test scores or performance in the areas of mathematics, writing, and reading that indicate students readiness to enroll in freshman-level academic college coursework. Public higher education institutions must have a developmental education plan for students who do not meet minimum passing standards. Every semester, Texas public higher education institutions report information to the Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board (THECB) about their students TSI status at the time of initial enrollment. The data collected is used to produce this report about the TSI status of recent public high school graduates who enroll in Texas public higher education and a number of other reports. Between the 2013-2014 report and the 2014-2015 report, the percentage of high school graduates entering college for the first time who were not TSI-met increased substantially. This increase likely was related to changes in the high school graduation testing requirements that began in Fall 2014. The passage of HB 5 in the 84 th legislative session removed the requirement that current and future high school students be required to take the STAAR English III and Algebra II End-of-Course (EOC) exams. Receiving a TAKS Exit Level or STAAR EOC score that meets the TSI college readiness standard in a section (Math, Reading, or Writing) is one of the allowable exemptions for meeting the college readiness standard specified in the Texas Administrative Code (TAC) 4.54. Prior to the 2014-2015 graduating cohort, almost all high school students were required to take the TAKS Exit-Level assessments. As such, for the 2014-2015 graduating cohort, the percentage of first-time-in-college (FTIC) students having automatic access to an allowable means of testing for TSI college readiness declined, and when students who enrolled took available tests to meet or exempt the TSI testing requirements (TSIA, ACT, SAT), the percentage who tested as ready dropped. The methodology for determining TSI college readiness status remained the same over this period. The TSI reporting process was modified in spring 2009. As a result, the methodology for the 2008 TSI high school report was transitional and several years of comparison data were provided. In years prior to 2009, college readiness was reported at the end of the student s first fall semester or the end of the first academic year, rather than college readiness status at initial enrollment. For this reason, comparisons should not be made with the data in the annual TSI high school reports prior to 2009. Please see prior year reports for specific information on this reporting change. As with prior TSI high school reports, this TSI report contains state-level data summaries disaggregated by student ethnicity, gender, high school curriculum, and economic status. Additionally, the report includes public school district results for each county, and district(s) within each county, listed alphabetically, but without further disaggregation. The data for very small districts (those with

fewer than five graduates or five students enrolled or for which no students passed any one of the TSI Standards categories) are combined into a single row at the top of the district-specific section of the report. State-level data for the current report is available below and can be accessed through a link on the top of page 2. Public school district data can be accessed in the ISD report using the link here or at the top of page 2. Once again, no direct comparisons should be made with the data in reports prior to 2009. The definitions below provide descriptions of the data in the report: Total High School Graduates... Number of students who graduated from a Texas public high school in academic year 2015-2016 Enrolled In Texas Public Higher Education.Number of graduates who enrolled in a public higher education institution the following fall (Fall 2016) Percent Enrolled Percent of high school graduates who enrolled in a public higher education institution the following fall 2015-2016 high school graduates who enrolled in Texas public higher education the following fall and who met TSI minimum passing standards* All Three Parts Number and percent of high school graduates enrolled in Texas public higher education who met TSI standards in all three areas prior to the Fall 2016 semester via (1) an approved test for TSI exemption (SAT, ACT, TAKS, or STAAR EOC), (2) the Texas Success Initiative Assessment (TSIA) and/or (3) other allowable means. Effective with an institution s first class day of the Fall 2013 semester, Board rule (TAC 4.56) specifies that institutions shall use the TSIA provided by the College Board exclusively as the Board-approved test for TSI purposes and can no longer use previous assessments (ACCUPLACER, Compass, THEA, Asset, Compass ESL, ACCUPLACER ESL). Math...Number and percent of high school graduates who met the TSI standard in math prior to the Fall 2016 semester via (1) the related section of a STAAR Algebra II EOC, TAKS, SAT, or ACT test, (2) the related section of the TSIA, or (3) other allowable means. Writing...Number and percent of high school graduates who met the TSI standard in writing prior to the Fall 2016 semester via (1) the related section of a STAAR English III EOC, TAKS, SAT, or ACT test, (2) the related section of the TSIA, or (3) other allowable means.

Reading Number and percent of high school graduates who met the TSI standard in reading prior to the Fall 2016 semester via (1) the related section of a STAAR English III EOC, TAKS, SAT, or ACT test, (2) the related section of the TSIA, or (3) other allowable means. Percentage Calculation: The percentage of students who met TSI is calculated by dividing the number who met the standard in one or all the TSI sections by the total number of students who enrolled in Texas Public Higher Education, which is shown in column 2. * Not included in the Met TSI Standards categories are enrollees for whom TSI minimum passing standards do not apply, are waived, or are exempted through means other than an approved test. Examples include students with military service, students enrolled in non-credit or non-degree programs, and students enrolled in a Level-One certificate program. Current dual credit students are not included.

Annual TSI Test Report of Student Performance 2015-2016 High School Graduates Enrolled in Texas Higher Education, Fall 2016 Statewide Summary by Ethnicity Met TSI Standards Enrolled All Areas Math Writing Reading Ethnicity (TEA) HS Grads N % Grads N % Enrs N % Enrs N % Enrs N % Enrs Asian 13,481 9,592 71.2 7,974 83.1 8,508 88.7 8,761 91.3 8,442 88.0 Afr. Amer. 41,084 17,218 41.9 6,844 39.7 7,767 45.1 10,978 63.8 10,517 61.1 Hispanic 157,633 68,070 43.2 34,098 50.1 38,367 56.4 50,207 73.8 47,579 69.9 Amer. Indian 1,280 540 42.2 289 53.5 324 60.0 397 73.5 399 73.9 Hawaiian/Pac.Islander 449 159 35.4 92 57.9 103 64.8 118 74.2 116 73.0 Two or More Races 5,833 2,680 45.9 1,774 66.2 1,880 70.1 2,233 83.3 2,229 83.2 White 104,551 50,026 47.8 34,865 69.7 36,625 73.2 42,728 85.4 43,123 86.2 Total 324,311 148,285 45.7 85,936 58.0 93,574 63.1 115,422 77.8 112,405 75.8 *Texas Education Agency (TEA) categorizations of race and ethnicity have been used for this analysis. Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board

Annual TSI Test Report of Student Performance 2015-2016 High School Graduates Enrolled in Texas Higher Education, Fall 2016 Statewide Summary by Gender Met TSI Standards Enrolled All Areas Math Writing Reading Gender HS Grads N % Grads N % Enrs N % Enrs N % Enrs N % Enrs Male 162,414 68,441 42.1 40,322 58.9 44,105 64.4 51,681 75.5 52,049 76.0 Female 161,897 79,844 49.3 45,614 57.1 49,469 62.0 63,741 79.8 60,356 75.6 Total 324,311 148,285 45.7 85,936 58.0 93,574 63.1 115,422 77.8 112,405 75.8 Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board

Annual TSI Test Report of Student Performance 2015-2016 High School Graduates Enrolled in Texas Higher Education, Fall 2016 Statewide Summary by Economically Disadvantaged Status Met TSI Standards Enrolled All Areas Math Writing Reading Economic HS Grads N % Grads N % Enrs N % Enrs N % Enrs N % Enrs N/A 173,389 87,010 50.2 57,750 66.4 61,281 70.4 72,657 83.5 72,139 82.9 Free Meal 105,961 40,763 38.5 17,764 43.6 20,633 50.6 27,781 68.2 25,996 63.8 Red. Price 19,090 9,217 48.3 5,013 54.4 5,590 60.6 7,014 76.1 6,836 74.2 Other 25,871 11,295 43.7 5,409 47.9 6,070 53.7 7,970 70.6 7,434 65.8 Total 324,311 148,285 45.7 85,936 58.0 93,574 63.1 115,422 77.8 112,405 75.8 Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board

Annual TSI Test Report of Student Performance 2015-2016 High School Graduates Enrolled in Texas Higher Education, Fall 2016 Statewide Summary by Diploma Type Met TSI Standards Enrolled All Areas Math Writing Reading Grad Type HS Grads N % Grads N % Enrs N % Enrs N % Enrs N % Enrs Distinguished 44,339 30,358 68.5 26,667 87.8 27,122 89.3 28,794 94.8 28,668 94.4 Individual Ed Plan 5,874 682 11.6 15 2.2 33 4.8 107 15.7 66 9.7 Minimum 37,123 5,841 15.7 742 12.7 979 16.8 2,316 39.7 2,203 37.7 Recommended 210,199 101,405 48.2 53,799 53.1 60,176 59.3 77,092 76.0 74,519 73.5 Foundation 26,776 9,999 37.3 4,713 47.1 5,264 52.6 7,113 71.1 6,949 69.5 Total 324,311 148,285 45.7 85,936 58.0 93,574 63.1 115,422 77.8 112,405 75.8 Note: Students entering high school before the 2014-2015 school year (including the cohort highlighted in this report) have the option to graduate under the new Foundation High School Program or the existing Minimum High School Program, Recommended High School Program, or Distinguished Achievement Program. The first cohort that will graduate using only the new Foundation Program began high school in 2014-2015, and will graduate in 2017-2018. Source: Texas Higher Education Coordinating Board