Response Option Weight Frequency Percent Percent Responses Means Strongly agree (5) %

Similar documents
COUNSELLING PROCESS. Definition

Enhancing Learning with a Poster Session in Engineering Economy

To tell the TRUTH: Dealing with Negativity in the Workplace

Illinois WIC Program Nutrition Practice Standards (NPS) Effective Secondary Education May 2013

Greek Teachers Attitudes toward the Inclusion of Students with Special Educational Needs

TAI TEAM ASSESSMENT INVENTORY

LITERACY ACROSS THE CURRICULUM POLICY

THE 2016 FORUM ON ACCREDITATION August 17-18, 2016, Toronto, ON

Academic Dean Evaluation by Faculty & Unclassified Professionals

Mastering Team Skills and Interpersonal Communication. Copyright 2012 Pearson Education, Inc. publishing as Prentice Hall.

THE CONSENSUS PROCESS

RESPONSE TO LITERATURE

Success Factors for Creativity Workshops in RE

ACTION LEARNING: AN INTRODUCTION AND SOME METHODS INTRODUCTION TO ACTION LEARNING

Aalya School. Parent Survey Results

Abu Dhabi Indian. Parent Survey Results

PROFESSIONAL TREATMENT OF TEACHERS AND STUDENT ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT. James B. Chapman. Dissertation submitted to the Faculty of the Virginia

Red Flags of Conflict

Abu Dhabi Grammar School - Canada

Joe Public ABC Company

Agree to volunteer at least six days in each calendar year ( (a)(8));

Experience Corps. Mentor Toolkit

PEDAGOGICAL LEARNING WALKS: MAKING THE THEORY; PRACTICE

Laporan Penelitian Unggulan Prodi

AC : DEVELOPMENT OF AN INTRODUCTION TO INFRAS- TRUCTURE COURSE

B. Outcome Reporting Include the following information for each outcome assessed this year:

Author: Justyna Kowalczys Stowarzyszenie Angielski w Medycynie (PL) Feb 2015

IMPLEMENTING THE EARLY YEARS LEARNING FRAMEWORK

STEPS TO EFFECTIVE ADVOCACY

Text Type Purpose Structure Language Features Article

Creating Travel Advice

Disability Resource Center St. Philip's College ensures Access. YOU create Success. Frequently Asked Questions

MENTORING. Tips, Techniques, and Best Practices

Study Group Handbook

THE WEB 2.0 AS A PLATFORM FOR THE ACQUISITION OF SKILLS, IMPROVE ACADEMIC PERFORMANCE AND DESIGNER CAREER PROMOTION IN THE UNIVERSITY

Observing Teachers: The Mathematics Pedagogy of Quebec Francophone and Anglophone Teachers

BENTLEY ST PAUL S C OF E PRIMARY SCHOOL POLICY FOR I.C.T. Growing together in faith, love and trust, we will succeed. Date of Policy: 2013

Seven Keys to a Positive Learning Environment in Your Classroom. Study Guide

E-learning Strategies to Support Databases Courses: a Case Study

leading people through change

Harvesting the Wisdom of Coalitions

The Common European Framework of Reference for Languages p. 58 to p. 82

NATIONAL SURVEY OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT

Full text of O L O W Science As Inquiry conference. Science as Inquiry

Table of Contents. Introduction Choral Reading How to Use This Book...5. Cloze Activities Correlation to TESOL Standards...

TRAINING MANUAL FOR FACILITATORS OF RADIO LISTENING GROUPS

Day 1 Note Catcher. Use this page to capture anything you d like to remember. May Public Consulting Group. All rights reserved.

Community Based Participatory Action Research Partnership Protocol

What Am I Getting Into?

Selling Skills. Tailored to Your Needs. Consultants & trainers in sales, presentations, negotiations and influence

Prepared by: Tim Boileau

Library Reference Services textbook Chapter 7

Young Enterprise Tenner Challenge

Effectively Resolving Conflict in the Workplace

Summary results (year 1-3)

Facilitating Difficult Dialogues in the Classroom. We find comfort among those who agree with us, growth among those who don t. Frank A.

TEACHER'S TRAINING IN A STATISTICS TEACHING EXPERIMENT 1

- SAMPLE ONLY - PLEASE DO NOT COPY

Carolina Course Evaluation Item Bank Last Revised Fall 2009

UDL AND LANGUAGE ARTS LESSON OVERVIEW

OPAC and User Perception in Law University Libraries in the Karnataka: A Study

Students will be able to describe how it feels to be part of a group of similar peers.

MULTIDISCIPLINARY TEAM COMMUNICATION THROUGH VISUAL REPRESENTATIONS

Me on the Map. Standards: Objectives: Learning Activities:

Rio Connection: Gallipolis Focus on Science Education

Demographic Survey for Focus and Discussion Groups

RESOLVING CONFLICT. The Leadership Excellence Series WHERE LEADERS ARE MADE

INTRODUCTION TO TEAM & TEAM DYNAMIC

A Retrospective Study

USE OF ONLINE PUBLIC ACCESS CATALOGUE IN GURU NANAK DEV UNIVERSITY LIBRARY, AMRITSAR: A STUDY

Increasing Student Engagement

Texas Woman s University Libraries

Colorado State University Department of Construction Management. Assessment Results and Action Plans

The Introvert s Guide to Building Rapport With Anyone, Anywhere

Creating a Working Alliance: Generic Interpersonal Skills and Concepts

Dentist Under 40 Quality Assurance Program Webinar

CONSISTENCY OF TRAINING AND THE LEARNING EXPERIENCE

National Survey of Student Engagement

PART C: ENERGIZERS & TEAM-BUILDING ACTIVITIES TO SUPPORT YOUTH-ADULT PARTNERSHIPS

STUDENT LEARNING ASSESSMENT REPORT

LMIS430: Administration of the School Library Media Center

Summer Assignment AP Literature and Composition Mrs. Schwartz

Delaware Performance Appraisal System Building greater skills and knowledge for educators

Tutor s Guide TARGET AUDIENCES. "Qualitative survey methods applied to natural resource management"

BEST OFFICIAL WORLD SCHOOLS DEBATE RULES

Why Pay Attention to Race?

Case of the Department of Biomedical Engineering at the Lebanese. International University

Some Basic Active Learning Strategies

Team Dispersal. Some shaping ideas

The One Minute Preceptor: 5 Microskills for One-On-One Teaching

Laura A. Riffel

The Rise and Fall of the

MANA 7A97 - STRESS AND WORK. Fall 2016: 6:00-9:00pm Th. 113 Melcher Hall

SULLIVAN & CROMWELL LLP

Student Handbook 2016 University of Health Sciences, Lahore

IMPACTFUL, QUANTIFIABLE AND TRANSFORMATIONAL?

Critical Incident Debriefing in a Group Setting Process Debriefing

Internship Department. Sigma + Internship. Supervisor Internship Guide

What Teachers Are Saying

Multi-Disciplinary Teams and Collaborative Peer Learning in an Introductory Nuclear Engineering Course

Transcription:

The instructor clearly communicated important course topics. Strongly agree (5) 2416 53.87% 4.34 Agree (4) 1467 32.71% Neutral (3) 392 8.74% Disagree (2) 123 2.74% Strongly disagree (1) 87 1.94% 4485/11588 (38.7%) 4.34 0.89 5.00 The instructor clearly communicated important course goals. Strongly agree (5) 2449 54.97% 4.37 Agree (4) 1458 32.73% Neutral (3) 385 8.64% Disagree (2) 95 2.13% Strongly disagree (1) 68 1.53% 4455/11588 (38.44%) 4.37 0.85 5.00 The instructor provided clear instructions on how to participate in course learning activities. Strongly agree (5) 2383 53.56% 4.32 Agree (4) 1441 32.39% Neutral (3) 382 8.59% Disagree (2) 152 3.42% Strongly disagree (1) 91 2.05% 4449/11588 (38.39%) 4.32 0.92 5.00 The instructor clearly communicated important due dates/time frames for learning activities. Strongly agree (5) 2581 58.03% 4.42 Agree (4) 1387 31.18% Neutral (3) 304 6.83% Disagree (2) 106 2.38% Strongly disagree (1) 70 1.57% 4448/11588 (38.38%) 4.42 0.84 5.00 Page 1 of 50

The instructor was helpful in identifying areas of agreement and disagreement on course topics that helped me to learn. Strongly agree (5) 2187 49.06% 4.18 Agree (4) 1350 30.28% Neutral (3) 606 13.59% Disagree (2) 182 4.08% Strongly disagree (1) 133 2.98% 4458/11588 (38.47%) 4.18 1.01 4.00 The instructor was helpful in guiding the class towards understanding course topics in a way that helped me clarify my thinking. Strongly agree (5) 2214 49.67% 4.18 Agree (4) 1351 30.31% Neutral (3) 533 11.96% Disagree (2) 201 4.51% Strongly disagree (1) 158 3.54% 4457/11588 (38.46%) 4.18 1.04 4.00 The instructor helped to keep course participants engaged and participating in productive dialogue. Strongly agree (5) 2280 51.16% 4.26 Agree (4) 1420 31.86% Neutral (3) 493 11.06% Disagree (2) 148 3.32% Strongly disagree (1) 116 2.6% 4457/11588 (38.46%) 4.26 0.96 5.00 The instructor helped keep the course participants on task in a way that helped me to learn. Strongly agree (5) 2202 49.49% 4.21 Agree (4) 1383 31.09% Neutral (3) 601 13.51% Disagree (2) 140 3.15% Strongly disagree (1) 123 2.76% 4449/11588 (38.39%) 4.21 0.98 4.00 Page 2 of 50

The instructor encouraged course participants to explore new concepts in this course. Strongly agree (5) 2342 52.5% 4.30 Agree (4) 1431 32.08% Neutral (3) 484 10.85% Disagree (2) 96 2.15% Strongly disagree (1) 108 2.42% 4461/11588 (38.5%) 4.30 0.92 5.00 Instructor actions reinforced the development of a sense of community among course participants. Strongly agree (5) 2187 49.23% 4.21 Agree (4) 1383 31.13% Neutral (3) 607 13.67% Disagree (2) 157 3.53% Strongly disagree (1) 108 2.43% 4442/11588 (38.33%) 4.21 0.97 4.00 The instructor helped to focus discussion on relevant issues in a way that helped me to learn. Strongly agree (5) 2281 51.42% 4.26 Agree (4) 1417 31.94% Neutral (3) 487 10.98% Disagree (2) 133 3% Strongly disagree (1) 118 2.66% 4436/11588 (38.28%) 4.26 0.96 5.00 The instructor provided feedback that helped me understand my strengths and weaknesses. Strongly agree (5) 2266 51.07% 4.18 Agree (4) 1262 28.44% Neutral (3) 527 11.88% Disagree (2) 200 4.51% Strongly disagree (1) 182 4.1% 4437/11588 (38.29%) 4.18 1.07 5.00 Page 3 of 50

The instructor provided feedback in a timely fashion. Strongly agree (5) 2390 54.23% 4.29 Agree (4) 1310 29.73% Neutral (3) 441 10.01% Disagree (2) 133 3.02% Strongly disagree (1) 133 3.02% 4407/11588 (38.03%) 4.29 0.97 5.00 Getting to know other course participants gave me a sense of belonging in the course. Strongly agree (5) 1394 31.45% 3.83 Agree (4) 1430 32.26% Neutral (3) 1216 27.43% Disagree (2) 259 5.84% Strongly disagree (1) 134 3.02% 4433/11588 (38.26%) 3.83 1.03 4.00 I was able to form distinct impressions of some course participants. Strongly agree (5) 1405 31.77% 3.88 Agree (4) 1580 35.73% Neutral (3) 1040 23.52% Disagree (2) 276 6.24% Strongly disagree (1) 121 2.74% 4422/11588 (38.16%) 3.88 1.02 4.00 Online or web-based communication is an excellent medium for social interaction. Strongly agree (5) 1435 32.45% 3.82 Agree (4) 1435 32.45% Neutral (3) 1049 23.72% Disagree (2) 345 7.8% Strongly disagree (1) 158 3.57% 4422/11588 (38.16%) 3.82 1.08 4.00 Page 4 of 50

I felt comfortable conversing through the online medium. Strongly agree (5) 1855 41.88% 4.17 Agree (4) 1724 38.93% Neutral (3) 647 14.61% Disagree (2) 132 2.98% Strongly disagree (1) 71 1.6% 4429/11588 (38.22%) 4.17 0.90 4.00 I felt comfortable participating in the course discussions. Strongly agree (5) 1943 43.91% 4.21 Agree (4) 1753 39.62% Neutral (3) 520 11.75% Disagree (2) 125 2.82% Strongly disagree (1) 84 1.9% 4425/11588 (38.19%) 4.21 0.89 4.00 I felt comfortable interacting with other course participants. Strongly agree (5) 1897 43.05% 4.21 Agree (4) 1762 39.98% Neutral (3) 572 12.98% Disagree (2) 111 2.52% Strongly disagree (1) 65 1.47% 4407/11588 (38.03%) 4.21 0.87 4.00 I felt comfortable disagreeing with other course participants while still maintaining a sense of trust. Strongly agree (5) 1735 39.25% 4.11 Agree (4) 1698 38.42% Neutral (3) 794 17.96% Disagree (2) 123 2.78% Strongly disagree (1) 70 1.58% 4420/11588 (38.14%) 4.11 0.90 4.00 Page 5 of 50

I felt that my point of view was acknowledged by other course participants. Strongly agree (5) 1821 41.27% 4.18 Agree (4) 1763 39.96% Neutral (3) 681 15.44% Disagree (2) 88 1.99% Strongly disagree (1) 59 1.34% 4412/11588 (38.07%) 4.18 0.86 4.00 Online discussions help me to develop a sense of collaboration. Strongly agree (5) 1621 36.83% 3.96 Agree (4) 1517 34.47% Neutral (3) 864 19.63% Disagree (2) 242 5.5% Strongly disagree (1) 157 3.57% 4401/11588 (37.98%) 3.96 1.05 4.00 Problems posed increased my interest in course issues. Strongly agree (5) 1611 36.3% 3.99 Agree (4) 1601 36.07% Neutral (3) 915 20.62% Disagree (2) 209 4.71% Strongly disagree (1) 102 2.3% 4438/11588 (38.3%) 3.99 0.98 4.00 Course activities piqued my curiosity. Strongly agree (5) 1738 39.26% 4.09 Agree (4) 1722 38.9% Neutral (3) 667 15.07% Disagree (2) 209 4.72% Strongly disagree (1) 91 2.06% 4427/11588 (38.2%) 4.09 0.95 4.00 Page 6 of 50

I felt motivated to explore content related questions. Strongly agree (5) 1793 40.69% 4.09 Agree (4) 1643 37.28% Neutral (3) 650 14.75% Disagree (2) 223 5.06% Strongly disagree (1) 98 2.22% 4407/11588 (38.03%) 4.09 0.97 4.00 I utilized a variety of information sources to explore problems posed in this course. Strongly agree (5) 1920 43.45% 4.22 Agree (4) 1788 40.46% Neutral (3) 540 12.22% Disagree (2) 113 2.56% Strongly disagree (1) 58 1.31% 4419/11588 (38.13%) 4.22 0.85 4.00 Brainstorming and finding relevant information helped me resolve content related questions. Strongly agree (5) 1817 40.96% 4.16 Agree (4) 1770 39.9% Neutral (3) 645 14.54% Disagree (2) 136 3.07% Strongly disagree (1) 68 1.53% 4436/11588 (38.28%) 4.16 0.89 4.00 Discussing course content with my classmates was valuable in helping me appreciate different perspectives. Strongly agree (5) 1742 39.25% 4.03 Agree (4) 1575 35.49% Neutral (3) 774 17.44% Disagree (2) 212 4.78% Strongly disagree (1) 135 3.04% 4438/11588 (38.3%) 4.03 1.02 4.00 Page 7 of 50

Combining new information helped me answer questions raised in course activities. Strongly agree (5) 1805 40.7% 4.15 Agree (4) 1783 40.2% Neutral (3) 643 14.5% Disagree (2) 128 2.89% Strongly disagree (1) 76 1.71% 4435/11588 (38.27%) 4.15 0.89 4.00 Learning activities helped me construct explanations/solutions. Strongly agree (5) 1814 40.83% 4.15 Agree (4) 1786 40.2% Neutral (3) 609 13.71% Disagree (2) 151 3.4% Strongly disagree (1) 83 1.87% 4443/11588 (38.34%) 4.15 0.91 4.00 Reflection on course content and discussions helped me understand fundamental concepts in this class. Strongly agree (5) 1819 41.03% 4.14 Agree (4) 1755 39.59% Neutral (3) 600 13.53% Disagree (2) 159 3.59% Strongly disagree (1) 100 2.26% 4433/11588 (38.26%) 4.14 0.93 4.00 I can describe ways to test and apply the knowledge created in this course. Strongly agree (5) 1806 40.71% 4.14 Agree (4) 1770 39.9% Neutral (3) 624 14.07% Disagree (2) 143 3.22% Strongly disagree (1) 93 2.1% 4436/11588 (38.28%) 4.14 0.92 4.00 Page 8 of 50

I have developed solutions to course problems that can be applied in practice. Strongly agree (5) 1807 40.88% 4.14 Agree (4) 1724 39% Neutral (3) 654 14.8% Disagree (2) 149 3.37% Strongly disagree (1) 86 1.95% 4420/11588 (38.14%) 4.14 0.92 4.00 I can apply the knowledge created in this course to my work or other non-class related activities. Strongly agree (5) 1905 43.17% 4.16 Agree (4) 1694 38.39% Neutral (3) 555 12.58% Disagree (2) 148 3.35% Strongly disagree (1) 111 2.52% 4413/11588 (38.08%) 4.16 0.94 4.00 Page 9 of 50